ugc major research project proposal format doc

Welcome, Login to your account.

Recover your password.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Research Funding in Context of University Grants Commission: Opportunities and Challenges

Research funding plays a critical role in the development and progress of higher education institutions. It provides resources necessary for conducting research projects, supporting researchers, and fostering innovation. The University Grants Commission (UGC) is a prominent organization responsible for allocating funds to universities across India. In this article, we will explore the opportunities and challenges associated with research funding in the context of the UGC.

To illustrate the significance of research funding, let us consider a hypothetical scenario: Imagine a university that has recently discovered a potential breakthrough in renewable energy technology. With adequate financial support, this university could further investigate this discovery and potentially revolutionize the field of sustainable energy. However, without proper research funding from organizations like the UGC, such groundbreaking studies may remain stagnant due to lack of resources.

In order to fully comprehend the implications of research funding within the purview of the UGC, it is essential to examine both its opportunities and challenges. This article aims to shed light on the diverse avenues through which universities can access grants provided by UGC for their research initiatives. Additionally, it will also delve into various obstacles faced by institutions when seeking these funds and propose strategies to overcome them effectively. By understanding these dynamics, stakeholders involved in academia can work towards enhancing research capabilities and facilitating meaningful contributions to the field of knowledge.

Opportunities for research funding through the UGC are abundant. The organization offers various schemes and programs that cater to different disciplines and research areas. One such scheme is the Major Research Project (MRP), which provides financial support for research projects with significant societal impact. Universities can submit proposals outlining their research objectives, methodologies, and expected outcomes to secure funding under this scheme.

Another opportunity lies in collaborative research projects supported by the UGC. Through initiatives like the Special Assistance Program (SAP) and Networking Resource Centers (NRCs), universities can collaborate with other institutions or experts within India or abroad. These collaborations help foster interdisciplinary research, exchange of knowledge, and access to additional resources.

Furthermore, the UGC encourages young researchers through its schemes like the Start-Up Grant for Young Scientists (SGY). This grant aims to provide financial assistance to early-career researchers who demonstrate potential for making significant contributions to their respective fields.

However, despite these opportunities, there are challenges associated with obtaining research funding from the UGC. One major challenge is the highly competitive nature of grant applications. The UGC receives numerous proposals each year, making it tough for every project to receive funding. It requires careful planning, strong justifications, and compelling evidence of feasibility and impact to increase chances of success.

Moreover, bureaucratic processes involved in securing funds can be time-consuming and complex. Institutions need to navigate through multiple stages of application submission, review committees, and documentation before receiving approval. This administrative burden can sometimes deter researchers from applying or delay timely disbursement of funds.

To overcome these challenges effectively, universities must adopt strategies that enhance their chances of securing research funding from the UGC. Firstly, it is crucial for institutions to build strong research capabilities by investing in infrastructure facilities and fostering a culture of innovation among faculty members and students.

Additionally, collaboration plays a vital role in accessing more substantial grants. By partnering with other universities, industries, or government agencies, institutions can pool resources and expertise to undertake larger-scale research projects that align with the UGC’s priorities.

Developing strong research proposals is also essential. Institutions must invest time and effort in designing well-structured and compelling grant applications that clearly articulate the significance of their research, methodology, expected outcomes, and potential societal impact. Seeking guidance from experienced researchers or consultants can be beneficial in this regard.

Finally, streamlining administrative processes within universities can help expedite the application and disbursement process. Establishing dedicated research support offices or committees that assist faculty members in navigating through grant procedures can significantly reduce bureaucratic hurdles.

In conclusion, research funding facilitated by the UGC plays a pivotal role in advancing higher education institutions’ research capabilities. By leveraging opportunities provided by the UGC and effectively addressing challenges associated with securing funds, universities can maximize their potential for groundbreaking discoveries and contribute meaningfully to society’s progress.

Current funding landscape

The current funding landscape for research in the context of University Grants Commission (UGC) presents both opportunities and challenges. To illustrate this, let us consider a hypothetical case study: Dr. Smith, a promising young researcher, has recently obtained her Ph.D. degree and is eager to embark on an ambitious research project exploring climate change impacts on biodiversity conservation.

In examining the current funding scenario, several key points emerge:

• Limited availability: Funding for research projects remains highly competitive, with limited resources allocated by the UGC. This scarcity often leads to intense competition among researchers seeking financial support for their projects.
• Stringent evaluation process: The allocation of funds involves a rigorous evaluation process based on various criteria such as novelty, feasibility, potential impact, and alignment with national priorities. Researchers must present compelling proposals that meet these requirements to secure funding.
• Unequal distribution: There exists a significant disparity in the distribution of funds across different disciplines within academia. Some fields receive more attention and resources than others due to perceived societal importance or economic implications.
• Regional variations: Funding patterns can also vary across regions within a country, reflecting regional priorities and disparities in infrastructure development or institutional capacity.

This complex funding landscape calls for careful consideration when applying for research grants from the UGC. Researchers must navigate through these challenges while ensuring their proposals align with national objectives and demonstrate innovation and potential impact.

Moving forward into the subsequent section about “Types of funding available,” it is crucial to explore the diverse avenues researchers can pursue to secure financial support for their research endeavors without compromising quality or integrity.

Types of funding available

The current funding landscape has a significant impact on the research activities carried out by universities. To illustrate this, let us consider the case of University X, which is renowned for its groundbreaking research in the field of biotechnology. Despite its exceptional achievements, University X faces numerous challenges due to the existing funding scenario.

Firstly, limited funding opportunities restrict the scope and scale of research projects undertaken by University X. With constrained resources, researchers are often compelled to narrow down their focus or abandon potentially transformative studies altogether. This not only hampers scientific progress but also limits the university’s ability to attract top-notch talent and retain experienced faculty members.

Furthermore, the competitive nature of securing grants adds another layer of complexity to the funding landscape. Universities like University X have to contend with an overwhelming number of applications for a limited pool of funds. The rigorously evaluated grant application process can be disheartening for researchers who invest considerable time and effort into developing proposals that may ultimately go unfunded.

These challenges faced by University X exemplify broader issues within the academic community across various disciplines. In order to grasp a deeper understanding of these impacts, it is essential to examine key points related to funding:

• Financial constraints hinder innovation and limit breakthrough discoveries.
• Limited resources lead to increased competition among researchers.
• High rejection rates demotivate scientists and impede career progression.
• Disparities in available funds create inequality among institutions.

Table: Comparison of Fund Availability Across Institutions

As depicted in the table above, there exists a clear disparity in available funds between different institutions. Such discrepancies contribute to an unequal distribution of research opportunities and hinder the progress of institutions operating with limited financial resources.

In light of these challenges, it is imperative to explore the criteria for receiving grants. By understanding the requirements set by funding agencies, universities can better position themselves to secure necessary funds for their research endeavors.

Criteria for receiving grants

Section 2: Types of Funding Available

To effectively navigate the research funding landscape, it is crucial to understand the various types of funding opportunities available through the University Grants Commission (UGC). This section will explore different avenues for securing research grants and highlight their significance in promoting academic excellence. To provide a practical illustration, we will consider the case study of Dr. Sharma, an early career researcher in the field of environmental science.

Funding Opportunities:

Government-funded Research Projects: These projects are initiated by governmental bodies such as UGC, aiming to address specific societal challenges or contribute to national development goals. They often involve interdisciplinary collaborations and encourage researchers to propose innovative solutions. For instance, Dr. Sharma could seek funding from UGC’s National Mission on Himalayan Studies to investigate the impact of climate change on high-altitude ecosystems.

• Awe-inspiring potential: The opportunity to work on government-sponsored research projects brings immense pride and recognition within academia.
• Financial stability: Securing such grants ensures financial support for research activities, allowing researchers like Dr. Sharma to focus solely on their investigations rather than worrying about resource constraints.
• Collaborative learning: Interdisciplinary nature of these projects fosters collaboration between experts across diverse fields, leading to valuable knowledge exchange and holistic problem-solving approaches.
• Long-lasting impact: Findings from government-funded research projects have the potential to influence policy decisions and bring positive changes at a larger scale.

Institutional Grants: Universities themselves offer internal funding mechanisms that aim to promote research excellence among faculty members. These grants may be awarded based on individual merit or institutional priorities outlined in strategic plans. For example, Dr. Sharma could apply for an institutional grant aimed at supporting young scientists exploring sustainable development practices in urban areas.

• Emotional Response Table :

Industry Collaborations: Engaging in collaborative projects with industry partners can provide researchers with financial support, access to cutting-edge technologies and expertise, as well as potential avenues for commercializing their findings. Dr. Sharma could explore partnerships with environmental organizations or companies specializing in sustainable development initiatives.

By understanding the various types of funding available through UGC, researchers like Dr. Sharma can strategically pursue grants that align with their research goals and contribute to societal progress. The next section will delve into the role of research projects in securing such funding, shedding light on how they serve as catalysts for academic growth and innovation.

Role of research projects in funding

While understanding the criteria for receiving grants is crucial, it is equally important to comprehend the impact that these grants have on research projects. This section focuses on exploring how funding opportunities provided by the University Grants Commission (UGC) play a significant role in supporting and shaping research endeavors.

The Impact of Grants

To illustrate the significance of research grants, let us consider a hypothetical case study involving Dr. Smith, an early-career researcher specializing in environmental sciences. Driven by a passion for sustainable development, Dr. Smith proposes a project investigating the impact of climate change on coastal ecosystems. Without external funding, this ambitious undertaking would be challenging to carry out comprehensively. However, with financial support from UGC grants, Dr. Smith can secure necessary resources such as laboratory equipment, fieldwork expenses, and hiring skilled researchers or assistants.

Grants Help Foster Innovation and Collaboration Furthermore, research grants create avenues for innovation and collaboration among scholars across institutions and disciplines. By providing financial assistance to multiple projects simultaneously, UGC encourages universities to foster collaborative efforts between different departments or even institutions nationwide. This cross-disciplinary approach enables researchers to bring diverse perspectives together and address complex scientific challenges more effectively.

Research grants offered by UGC evoke various emotions among academic communities:

• Excitement: The opportunity to secure funds instills enthusiasm among researchers who strive to explore new frontiers.
• Relief: Researchers often face resource constraints; therefore, obtaining funding provides relief from financial burdens.
• Motivation: The availability of grants motivates researchers to propose novel ideas and undertake innovative projects.
• Commitment: Funding serves as recognition for past achievements while inspiring recipients to continue contributing significantly to their respective fields.

Table showcasing examples of successful research projects funded by UGC:

These projects exemplify the diverse research areas that UGC grants support, emphasizing the organization’s commitment to promoting knowledge creation across various disciplines and institutions.

The Impact of Grants on Research Development

In conclusion, research grants provided by the UGC play a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of academic research projects. By offering financial assistance, these grants enable researchers to carry out their work more comprehensively, fostering innovation and collaboration among institutions and scholars alike. The emotional response generated within the academic community further highlights the significance of such funding opportunities. In the subsequent section, we will explore the process of securing competitive funding and its implications for researchers seeking financial support from the UGC.

Transition sentence into next section:

With an understanding of how grants influence research projects, it is essential to delve into the process of securing competitive funding without overlooking key steps or requirements.

Process of securing competitive funding

Section Title: Role of research projects in funding and its impact on academic institutions

Research projects play a crucial role in securing funding for academic institutions, such as universities, through programs like the University Grants Commission (UGC). This section examines how research projects contribute to obtaining competitive funding and highlights their significance in supporting the overall academic mission.

One example that illustrates the importance of research projects in funding is the case study of XYZ University. Through their dedicated research endeavors, XYZ University successfully secured a grant from the UGC to conduct an interdisciplinary study on climate change and its socio-economic impacts. This project not only provided financial support but also facilitated collaborations among different departments within the university and fostered relationships with external stakeholders.

Research projects offer several benefits when it comes to securing competitive funding:

• Enhancing institutional reputation: Engaging in cutting-edge research allows academic institutions to establish themselves as leaders in specific fields, attracting attention from both national and international funders.
• Promoting collaboration: Research projects often require multidisciplinary approaches, leading to increased collaboration between faculty members across various disciplines within an institution or even with other organizations.
• Providing opportunities for student involvement: Students can actively participate in funded research projects, gaining hands-on experience while contributing valuable insights to ongoing studies.
• Addressing societal challenges: Many research grants focus on pressing social issues, allowing academic institutions to address these challenges directly by conducting impactful studies that inform policy-making processes.

Table: Benefits of Research Projects in Funding

Research projects not only secure funding but also contribute to the overall academic development of institutions. By engaging in transformative research, universities can enhance their reputation and foster collaboration among faculty members and students from diverse backgrounds. This collaborative environment creates a synergy that promotes innovation and impactful contributions towards addressing societal challenges.

Transitioning into the subsequent section on “Challenges in accessing grants,” it is essential to acknowledge that while research projects play a pivotal role in securing funding, there are various obstacles faced by academic institutions when pursuing competitive grants. These challenges will be explored further to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved in obtaining financial support for research endeavors.

Challenges in accessing grants

Securing competitive funding: A complex process with multifaceted considerations

The process of securing competitive research funding is a crucial aspect for researchers and institutions seeking financial support from the University Grants Commission (UGC). Understanding the intricacies involved in this process can help researchers navigate through its challenges and optimize their chances of success.

To illustrate, let us consider the case of Dr. X, an early-career researcher who aims to investigate the impact of climate change on coastal ecosystems. Driven by a desire to contribute towards sustainable environmental management, Dr. X seeks UGC funding that will enable them to conduct comprehensive fieldwork and gather essential data. However, acquiring such funding requires thorough preparation and adherence to certain guidelines set forth by the UGC.

One significant factor that plays a pivotal role in obtaining research grants is crafting a compelling proposal. Researchers must articulate the significance of their work clearly while aligning it with UGC’s priorities and objectives. Additionally, they should showcase their expertise and track record through previous publications or successful projects. The proposal needs to demonstrate both innovation and feasibility, emphasizing how it addresses critical gaps in knowledge or contributes to policy development.

Despite these requirements, accessing grants remains challenging due to various reasons:

• Intense competition: The limited availability of funds often leads to intense competition among researchers vying for similar resources. This situation necessitates developing proposals that stand out amidst numerous applications.
• Stringent evaluation criteria: The UGC employs rigorous evaluation processes involving peer-review panels comprising experts from diverse disciplines. These evaluations assess not only scientific merit but also potential societal impact and alignment with national priorities.
• Administrative complexities: Navigating bureaucratic procedures within universities can be time-consuming and demanding for researchers unfamiliar with grant application protocols.
• Changing landscape: Research priorities evolve over time as new challenges emerge globally or nationally, requiring applicants to remain up-to-date regarding shifting areas of focus.

These challenges emphasize the need for careful attention to detail and strategic planning when pursuing UGC research funding. Researchers must be proactive in seeking guidance from experienced mentors, collaborating with interdisciplinary teams, and engaging with potential stakeholders to enhance the quality of their proposals.

In light of these considerations, it becomes evident that Securing competitive funding is a multifaceted task requiring researchers’ dedication and perseverance. The next section will explore how such funding influences research outcomes and contributes to knowledge advancement in various fields.

Transition: Understanding the complexities involved in securing competitive funding sets the stage for comprehending its subsequent impact on research outcomes.

Impact of funding on research outcomes

Despite the challenges in accessing grants, securing research funding through the University Grants Commission (UGC) can have a significant impact on research outcomes. This section explores the various ways in which funding influences the quality and productivity of academic research.

Research funding plays a pivotal role in facilitating innovative studies and advancing scientific knowledge. For instance, let us consider a hypothetical case study where Dr. Smith, an early-career researcher, receives a substantial grant from UGC to investigate sustainable solutions for renewable energy. With this financial support, Dr. Smith is able to assemble a team of experts, acquire state-of-the-art laboratory equipment, and conduct extensive field experiments over an extended period. The availability of resources allows Dr. Smith’s project to produce groundbreaking findings that contribute to addressing urgent environmental concerns.

The impact of research funding goes beyond individual projects; it extends to broader institutional development as well. Investment in research infrastructure enables universities to attract top-tier faculty members who are leading experts in their respective fields. As these renowned researchers join the institution, they bring with them fresh perspectives and novel methodologies that enrich the overall intellectual climate within academia. Consequently, this creates opportunities for interdisciplinary collaborations and fosters innovation across different disciplines.

To further illustrate the transformative potential of research funding, consider the following emotional appeal:

• Increased access to cutting-edge technologies
• Enhanced collaboration among researchers
• Accelerated progress towards societal goals
• Improved global competitiveness

These factors highlight how adequate financial support has far-reaching implications for both individual researchers and society at large.

Table: Examples of Research Funding Impacts

In summary, research funding provided by the UGC has a profound impact on research outcomes. Not only does it empower individual researchers to conduct high-quality studies, but it also facilitates broader institutional development by attracting top talent and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations. Beyond these immediate effects, research funding contributes to the advancement of knowledge, enhances academic reputation, promotes technological innovation, and addresses social and economic challenges.

Transition into subsequent section about “Innovation and entrepreneurship grants”: Furthermore, exploring additional avenues for funding such as innovation and entrepreneurship grants opens up new possibilities for transformative research endeavors.

Innovation and entrepreneurship grants

The availability and allocation of adequate funding play a crucial role in determining the success and impact of research projects. In examining the impact of funding on research outcomes, it is essential to consider various factors that contribute to this relationship. For instance, let us consider a hypothetical case study involving two researchers who have similar expertise and access to resources but differ in terms of funding received.

Firstly, researchers with higher levels of funding often have greater access to state-of-the-art facilities and equipment necessary for conducting cutting-edge research. This enables them to carry out experiments more efficiently and produce high-quality data, thus enhancing the robustness of their results. Additionally, increased funding allows researchers to hire competent research assistants or collaborate with experts from other institutions, thereby promoting interdisciplinary approaches and enriching the overall quality of their work.

Secondly, adequate funding provides researchers with opportunities for attending conferences, workshops, and seminars where they can present their findings and receive valuable feedback from peers in their respective fields. Such interactions foster intellectual exchange and facilitate knowledge sharing among scholars working on similar topics. Consequently, well-funded researchers are better positioned to stay updated with the latest developments in their field, which can positively influence the direction and relevance of their own research endeavors.

Moreover, financial support plays an instrumental role in enabling long-term research projects by providing stability throughout different phases. Researchers require sustained funding for recurring expenses such as maintenance costs for laboratory equipment or salaries for project staff members. Without consistent financial backing, projects may face interruptions or delays that impede progress towards achieving desired outcomes.

To further emphasize these points about the Impact of funding on research outcomes :

• Adequate funds allow researchers to focus more on their studies rather than worrying about financial constraints.
• Insufficient funding hampers innovative ideas by limiting access to necessary resources.
• A lack of monetary support discourages early-career researchers from pursuing ambitious projects.
• Funding disparities can lead to inequities in research opportunities and outcomes.

In conclusion, funding plays a pivotal role in determining the success of research projects by enabling researchers to carry out high-quality experiments, fostering intellectual exchange through participation in conferences, workshops, and seminars, as well as providing stability throughout various phases of long-term projects. However, it is crucial to address disparities in funding allocation to ensure equitable opportunities and maximize the potential impact of research outcomes.

Transitioning into the subsequent section about “Future prospects and recommendations,” it is worth considering how improving funding mechanisms can pave the way for enhanced research endeavors.

Future prospects and recommendations

In the realm of research funding, universities often rely on grants provided by organizations like the University Grants Commission (UGC). These grants play a crucial role in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship within academic institutions. However, along with opportunities, there are also several challenges that need to be addressed for effective utilization of these funds.

One example illustrating the significance of UGC grants is the case study of XYZ University. With the help of an innovation grant from UGC, this university established a state-of-the-art research center dedicated to developing sustainable energy solutions. The grant not only facilitated cutting-edge research but also encouraged collaboration between academia and industry partners. This exemplifies how such funding can drive progress in critical areas and contribute to societal development.

Despite their importance, accessing UGC grants poses various challenges for universities. Firstly, the application process can be highly competitive and time-consuming. Institutions must prepare comprehensive proposals highlighting the potential impact of their projects while conforming to stringent guidelines set by the UGC. Moreover, once awarded, managing and allocating funds effectively becomes paramount; ensuring transparency and accountability throughout the project’s lifecycle requires meticulous planning and execution.

To better understand the complexities associated with securing UGC grants, consider the following emotional responses:

• Frustration: Applicants may feel overwhelmed due to intense competition.
• Relief: Successful candidates experience relief upon receiving confirmation.
• Empowerment: Universities benefitting from grants gain confidence in pursuing ambitious research goals.
• Disappointment: Rejected applicants might feel discouraged or disheartened.

Unraveling future prospects and offering recommendations concerning research funding is essential for continuous improvement. By enhancing communication channels between granting agencies and universities, both parties can align their objectives more effectively. Additionally, simplifying application procedures without compromising quality can increase participation and diversify research projects. Lastly, investing in training programs that educate researchers on grant writing and financial management would empower universities to maximize the potential of UGC grants.

In conclusion, UGC grants provide valuable opportunities for innovation and entrepreneurship within universities. However, overcoming challenges related to competition, guidelines, and accountability is crucial for successful utilization of these funds. By addressing these obstacles head-on and implementing effective strategies, institutions can harness the transformative power of research funding to drive societal progress.

Related posts:

Competitive Funding: University Grants Commission’s Impact on Research Funding

Grants Unveiled: University Grants Commission Research Funding Revealed

• University Grants Commission: Research Funding and Projects

Need-Based Scholarships for Higher Education: UGC Scholarships

Financial Aid for Students: University Grants Commission Perspective

Research Funding in Context of University Grants Commission: Opportunities and…

Comments are closed.

• --> Try Free Downloads
• Computer Science & Applications
• General Paper 1
• Human Resource Management
• Library And Information Science
• Political Science
• Biotechnology (BT)
• Biological Sciences (BL)
• Mathematical Statistics (MS)
• Mathematics (MA)
• Physics (PH)
• Geology (GG)
• Chemistry (CY)
• Economics (EN)
• Chemical Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Life Sciences
• Mathematical Sciences
• Physical Sciences
• General Aptitude
• JEE Advanced
• Computer Science And IT
• Electronics And Communication
• RRB Group D
• SSC GD Constable
• Choose Exam Goal
• About Eduncle
• Announcements

Speak With a Friendly Mentor.

• My Wishlist
• Subscribe Exams
• Try Free Downloads

•   Articles (93)
•   Products (166)
•   Reviews

   Top Resources

•    Why UGC NET?
•    Tips by Toppers
•    Syllabus
•    Eligibility
•    Question Papers
•    Answer Keys
•    Mock Test Download
•    Our Results & Toppers
•    Why Choose Eduncle?

Eduncle posted an Article

Ugc research project 2023 - general guidelines & grants.

Keeping the aspiration to become a University Teacher or an Assistant Professor and making every possible effort to actualize this dream, is the new career trend of millions of aspirants in India.

Every year, almost 10-11 lakhs applicants register for UGC NET . On the other hand, the CSIR NET Exam   authorities witness the registration of almost 3-4 lakh science students.

Apart from these major exams, there are many such competitive tests through which the teaching enthusiasts can meet their career goals.

Thanks to the University Grants Commission who holds the maintenance of higher education by providing recognition to Universities & a huge amount of fund to ease out their operations & functionalities.

Moreover, the UGC provides outstanding career benefits to University Teachers and motivate them to enhance their knowledge base by providing the funds and grants for the major researches.

If you’ve already qualified UGC NET/CSIR NET or aspiring to qualify any of these exams, you should be aware of the UGC grants for teachers as well as the guidelines to avail these grants for UGC Major Research Projects 2023.

Here in this blog, we’ll provide you an authentic information about the UGC Major Research Project & UGC Minor Research Project Eligibility Guidelines, Applying Procedures & Grants offered by the commission.

Available Grants for Faculties

Non-Recurring Grants

Recurring grants.

Who is Eligible for UGC Research Projects?

How to Apply for UGC Research Projects (Major & Minor)

General Instruction & Guidelines

Start your UGC NET Exam preparation with free study kit designed by Eduncle Experts. Download Now

Which Grants are Available for Faculties to Handle UGC Research Projects 2023?

Do you know what kind of grants are available to you after becoming a college or university faculty? If not! Then read the following information carefully.

All grants are given to the teachers would be based on the numerous requirements.

For the needs of teachers and their support, the commission will provide financial assistance for the items like books and journals, equipment, contingency, hiring services, chemical and consumables, fieldwork and travels.

The allowable grants to the university teachers are subdivided into two categories

Non – Recurring Grants

  Recurring Grants

These grants are the fixed expenses of university teachers. Let’s discuss in brief!

Also know about the Career Benefits after UGC NET Lectureship Exam .      

These are the expenses which are required by the teachers on daily basis and the grants can also be repeated again and again.

Following are the Non-Recurring Grants allowed by the commission

1. Equipment, Books & Journals –

  For a proposed research work, it's essential to have the equipment, books and Grants are provided to obtain these necessary journals, books and equipment.

  If there any necessity of increment in the cost of approved equipment that will be only met out of saving/re-appropriation from the Non-recurring head which will be approved by Principal/Registrar of the college/University under intimation to the commission.

  After the completion of Project, the books & journals and equipment should be submitted to University/College/Institution or in the departmental library or in central

Procedure to Apply for UGC Research Project for Teachers –

The teachers who are eligible for UGC Major Research Project Online Submission will have to fill the prescribed format of UGC Major Research Project which will be available on the official website of UGC .

The concerned institute should get the proposal assessed by their research bodies with a certificate and should mention that the proposed research work is in conformity with the MRP guidelines. This process should be done before submitting the application form for MRP.

  The downloaded three copies of the same duly forwarded by the Principal/Registrar of the concerned University/College/Institution need to be bought at the time of interface meeting.

  UGC Minor Projects will be allocated by the concerned University out of the development grants.

  College teachers, who wish to avail financial assistance for their minor research project have to submit their MRP applications in the prescribed proforma at UGC concerned regional office which is located in the following cities – Bhopal, Guwahati, Kolkata, Bangalore, Hyderabad and in Pune.

  Teachers who are from the colleges of Northern Region including Delhi may apply to the Northern Region Colleges Bureau which is situated at 35, Feroz Shah Road, New Delhi – 110001.

Procedure for Approval of UGC Research Project for Teachers

If the proposal found to be completed in all the respect of the Principal Investigators, the applicants will be invited for making presentations before the committee.

  The Participants will not be paid for any TA/DA.

  The decision will be taken by the University Grants Commission on the basis of all the recommendations made by the committee and on the availability of funds under the scheme.

All those are the special key points that you should know well before applying for research projects.

Below we are going to tell some more general instructions which are very important to be known by you.

Know what type of questions are asked in the exam by solving UGC NET Last 5 Exams Question Papers. Download Here

UGC Major Research Project 2023 General Instructions and Guidelines

The University Grants Commission has set some general instructions and guidelines, which are compulsory to be known by all the teachers. These instructions will help you to clear all your doubts regarding the Projects for Teachers.

When the selection procedure of the UGC Major Research Projects will get finalized, the names of all the selected PI will be announced on the official website of UGC.

  To get the approval/sanction letters, the Principal Investigators have to check their names and also required to send the acceptance certificate duly forwarded by the Registrar/Principal of the institutions immediately.

Principal Investigator who need to go outside the country for an assignment should not exceed more than three months. In the absence of Principal Investigator, Co-Investigator will have to act as Principal Investigator.

The project will not be transferable in any case.

  If the PI gets transferred from the original place of work to another institution, there is no requirement for furnished objection certificate from both the institutions. All the facilities will be provided as per the necessity.

  Principal Investigator may publish the results of the study on the project acknowledging the contribution made by the staff appointed for the project and the support received from the UGC.

  Fellows who are engaged in project may enrol for Ph.D. The generated data and results out of the project can be used by the Fellow in his/her proposal ideas by consulting the Principal Investigator.

  If a PI fails to complete the project, the entire amount sanctioned has to be refunded by the Principal Investigator with the interest.

  There will be no extension in tenure in any circumstances.

The candidates who perform well in the research field may also receive UGC Awards or CSIR Awards based on their performances.

So, the above-mentioned guidelines are the base for providing grants to university/college teacher for UGC Research Project.

We hope that the information given by us is beneficial for you.

If you have any queries regarding this article, you can share them with us in the comments box given below. Our expert team will help you with the best guidance.

Thank You!!

• ugc major research project
• ugc minor research project
• ugc research project for teachers
• ugc research project guidelines
• ugc research project 2022
• ugc research project 2023

You Might Also Like

I am an Assistant Professor of HR Management stream in Amity University Kolkata. I am interested to know about the types of minor projects that are funded by UGC. If some sample project titles are shared that would be highly appreciatable

• Likes ( 0 )

Dr.vinutha m

Myself DR.VINUTHA M ASSISTANT PROFESSOR in B.ed institution mysore I want more information about minor research project.

I am an assistant professor in Ranchi Women's College (autonomous unit) under Ranchi University on contractual basis. I want to know whether I am eligible for PI or not.

The format for online submission of a major project is of 2014-15, not 2018-19.So very confused please help me to clear my doubt.

sir/mam please let me know what is the last date of proposal submission .whether major research project have been closed for college teachers

Dear sir, Could you please tell me when is the last date for the submission of UGC major/minor project for 2018? I didn't find any announcement in this regard. Looking forward to hearing from you. with best regards vijay

When the project release please inform me

Do You Want Better RANK in Your Exam?

Start Your Preparations with Eduncle’s FREE Study Material

• Updated Syllabus, Paper Pattern & Full Exam Details
• Sample Theory of Most Important Topic
• Model Test Paper with Detailed Solutions
• Last 5 Years Question Papers & Answers

Sign Up to Download FREE Study Material Worth Rs. 500/-

I agree to the Terms and Conditions

I agree to receive exam notifications via WhatsApp.

Wait Wait Wait... !

We Have Something Special for YOU

Download FREE Study Material Designed by Subject Experts & Qualifiers

Want Enhanced Learning Experience For Exam Preparation?

• Ask Your Doubts and Get Them Answered by Exam Experts & Students' Community Members Across India
• Regular Guidance, Mentorship & Study Tips by Eduncle Experts
• Quality Content with More Than 300 Courses in Multiple Exams Curated by Experts

Enter your mobile number to get the download link.

Learning & Teaching App

Skyrocket Your Chances to RANK HIGHER in the Exam

 Time management is very much important in IIT JAM. The eduncle test series for IIT JAM Mathematical Statistics helped me a lot in this portion. I am very thankful to the test series I bought from eduncle.

 Eduncle served as my guiding light. It has a responsive doubt solving team which solves & provides good solutions for your queries within 24 hours. Eduncle Mentorship Services guides you step by step regarding your syllabus, books to be used to study a subject, weightage, important stuff, etc.

 The General Aptitude part of Eduncle study materials were very good and helpful. Chapters of the Earth Science were also very satisfactory.

 The study material of Eduncle helps me a lot. The unit wise questions and test series were helpful. It helped me to clear my doubts. When I could not understand a topic, the faculty support too was good. Thanks Eduncle.

 I recommend Eduncle study material & services are best to crack UGC-NET exam because the material is developed by subject experts. Eduncle material consists a good no. of ques with online test series & mock test papers.

 I am truly Statisfied with study material of Eduncle.com for English their practise test paper was really awsome because it helped me to crack GSET before NET. Thanks Team of eduncle.

Request a Call back

Let Our Mentors Help You With the Best Guidance

We have Received Your Query

Are you sure you want to Unfollow ?

How can we assist you?

Oops! You Can’t Unfollow Your Default Category.

Your profile has been successfully submitted

Kindly give us 1 - 3 week to review your profile. In case of any query, write to us at [email protected]

• Login for Applicant
• Login for ICSSR Officials
• Research Projects (Major and Minor)
• Google Plus

You are here

Guidelines for research projects (major and minor), 1. introduction.

1.1 Promotion of social science research is one of the major objectives of the ICSSR. Research grant is financial support to research projects undertaken by the Indian Social Scientists. ICSSR provides funding to Indian scholars to conduct cutting edge research in various fields of social sciences that have theoretical, conceptual, methodological and policy implications. The Research Projects may belong to any of the social science disciplines or may be multi-disciplinary in nature.

The broad disciplines of study, within the domain of social sciences, are:

1. Economics/ Development Studies 2. Management 3. Commerce 4. Sociology 5. Social Work 6. Social Anthropology 7. Cultural Studies 8. Sanskrit Studies 9. Socio-Philosophical Studies 10. Sociolinguistics 11. Gender Studies 12. Health Studies 13. Political Science 14. International Studies 15. Public Administration 16. Diaspora Studies 17. National Security and Strategic Studies 18. Education 19. Social Psychology 20. Legal Studies 21. Social Geography 22. Environmental Studies 23. Social History 24. Media Studies 25. Library Science 26. Language Studies

Note: Support may also be provided to researchers/scholars belonging to disciplines other than the ones mentioned above provided he/she is interested in and has in the opinion of the ICSSR the necessary competence to conduct research in social sciences or social aspects of other sciences. Projects that span across disciplinary boundaries also fall within the areas of the Council’s interests.

1.2 Categories of Research Projects

The ICSSR awards two types of research projects on the basis of the scope, duration of the study and budget: (a) Minor Projects will be awarded for a duration of 12 months with a budget up to Rs.10.00 lakh. (b) (b) Major Projects will be awarded for a duration of 24 months with a budget up to Rs.25.00 lakh.

2. Eligibility

2.1 ICSSR Regional Centres, ICSSR Research Institutes, ICSSR Recognised Institutes, Institutes of National Importance as defined by the Ministry of Education (MoE), UGC Recognized Indian Universities/Deemed Universities/ Affiliated Colleges/Institutions under (2)F / 12(B) etc., are eligible to apply. However, other registered organisations with established research and academic standing may collaborate with any of the above-mentioned institutions for implementation of the study and may form a joint team consisting of Project Director, Co-Project Director(s) etc. Such collaborations have to be clearly stated in application itself.

2.2 Professional social scientists who are permanently employed or retired as faculty in a UGC (University Grants Commission) recognized Indian university/ deemed University / Colleges with requisite research infrastructure / institute of national importance / ICSSR Regional Centres, ICSSR Research Institutes, ICSSR Recognised Institutes and possessing a Ph.D. and demonstrable research experience through publications of books / research papers / reports are eligible to apply. Both the Project Director and Co- Director must possess a Ph.D. degree and a proven track record of high-quality research as evidenced by past studies, publications and their academic background.

2.3 Senior government and defence officers (not less than 25 years of regular service) and persons with proven Social Science expertise possessing a Ph. D. degree or equivalent research work in any social science disciplines and demonstrable research experience through publications of books/research papers/reports can also apply, preferably in collaboration with a faculty in a social science discipline from institutions given in 2.1 above.

2.4 Retired faculty/teachers and government/defence officers are required to affiliate to ICSSR Regional Centers / ICSSR Research Institutes /  ICSSR Recognised Institutes / Institute of national importance / UGC recognized Indian University / Deemed University of his / her choice with the prior approval of the ICSSR.

3. How to Apply

3.1 The applications will be invited through an advertisement on ICSSR website, social media platforms of ICSSR and if required, in print media.

3.2. The applicants shall submit an online application which includes the research proposal in the given prescribed format. They are also required to submit the hard copies of their application and annexures, duly forwarded by the Competent Authorities of the affiliating university/college/institute, within 10 days of the prescribed last date of online submission.

3.3 In case, the hard copy of application is not received within 10 days of asking, the candidature of applicants shall be treated as withdrawn/cancelled.

3.4 Research proposals and final reports should either be in English or Hindi. (Use Devanagari to fill Application form in Hindi).

3.5. Scholars can only apply for one project at a time. In case of any ongoing or completed project with the ICSSR, the cooling-off period for applying to another project will be two years, with the duration calculated from the date of acceptance of the final report.

4. Procedure for Awards

4.1 Applications are scrutinised by the ICSSR Secretariat/and or by a Screening Committee in respect of eligibility.  Eligible applications are then examined and evaluated by the Expert Committee(s). Shortlisted candidates are then called for presentation and interaction at ICSSR (in person or online) before another expert committee. The expert committee(s) make(s) recommendation for award of studies and also suggest(s) budget for the recommended studies.

4.2 The number of candidates called for presentations / interaction will be twice the number of projects to be awarded.

5. Budget and Heads of Expenditure

5.1 The amount will be disbursed in number of instalments, depending on the phases and duration of the study, as indicated in the Sanction Letter. ICSSR reserves the right, based on Expert opinion, to convert a proposal for Major Research Project into Minor Research Project or vice versa.

5.2 The detailed budget estimates along with the proportionate Heads of Expenditure for these proposals are to be prepared by the Institute / Project Director / group of scholars. Those Project Director(s) would like to work without Research Personnel, especially under Minor Research Project would make the proportionate Heads of Expenditure for the proposed Budget.

5.3 Allocation of Heads of Expenditure

• The remuneration for the Research Staff must be according to the ICSSR guidelines.
• The proportionate allocation of expenditure for the budget heads such as Fieldwork (Travel / Logistics / Boarding, Survey Preparation or Consultancy etc.); Equipment and Study material (Computer, Printer, Source Material, Books, Journals, Software, Data Sets, workshop etc.); and Contingency charges etc., to be decided by the Project Director in consultation with the affiliating institution.
• Affiliating Institutional Overhead Charges @ 7.5% over and above on the awarded grant of the project, subject to a maximum limit of Rs.1, 00,000/- will be released by the ICSSR after successful completion of the project.

5.4 Remuneration and Emoluments of Project Staff shall be engaged/appointed as per the rules by the Project Director on a full/ part-time basis during the research work. The duration may be decided by the project director. The consolidated monthly emoluments of the project staff must be according to the following:

5.5 Selection of Research Staff should be done through an advertisement publishing on respective institute’s website and a selection committee consisting of (1) Project Director; (2) One outside Expert (other than the institute where the project is located); (3) a nominee of the Vice Chancellor/Head of the Institution and (4) Dean of the faculty or Head of the Department of the Project Director duly approved by the competent authority.

5.6 For all field work related expenses of Project Director, Co-Project Director(s) and project personnel, rules of affiliating institutes/universities shall be followed.

5.7 All equipment and books purchased out of the project fund shall be the property of the affiliating institution, and a certificate duly signed by the Head of the Institute / Registrar / Principal has to submit to the ICSSR. However, ICSSR may ask for books or/and equipment if it so requires

6. Joining and Release of Grants

6.1 The Project Director has to join the project within one month of the award letter.  For this the scholar has to submit an ‘undertaking’ on an Rs.100 stamp paper, declaration on an Rs.100 stamp paper, date of commencement of the study and grant-in-aid bill towards the first instalment. This period can be extended only in exceptional circumstances up to a maximum of three months by the ICSSR.

6.2 The total awarded grant for the Major Research Project will be released in instalments as indicated in the Sanction Order.

• The first instalment (50% from the total awarded grant) is released after completing the necessary formalities of joining by the Project Director.
• The second instalment (20% from the total awarded grant) is released after receiving a satisfactory twelve months Progress Report, Simple Statement of Accounts with 60% and above utilisation of the first instalment amount, one published research paper in the peer reviewed journal along with grant-in-aid bill towards the second instalment.
• The third instalment (20% from the total awarded grant) will be released after receiving book length Final Report, Executive Summary of Final Report, 500 words abstract of the Final Report (both MS word and PDF formats), second  published research paper (total 2 papers during the project period) in the peer reviewed journal, similarity index score sheet of final report, simple statement of accounts for the expenditure of the so far spent amount along with grant-in-aid bill towards the third instalment.
• Final instalment (remaining 10% from the total awarded grant) will be issued after receipt of recommendation of the expert for acceptance of the Final Report, Audited statement of accounts (AC) in prescribed format with utilization certificate (UC) in GFR-12A form for the entire approved project amount duly signed by the Finance Officer/Registrar/Director of the affiliating Institution, verification of all documents and decision on retaining of equipment and books etc. The institutions of which the accounts are not audited by CAG/AG, their utilisation certificate will be signed by the Finance Officer and a chartered accountant.

6.3 The total awarded grant for the Minor Research Project will be released in instalments as indicated below or in the Sanction Order.

• Scholar needs to submit a satisfactory six months Progress Report during the project period.
• The second instalment (40% from the total awarded grant) will be released after receiving book length Final Report, Executive Summary of Final Report, 500 words abstract of the Final Report (both MS word and PDF formats), one published research paper in the peer reviewed journal, similarity index score sheet of final report, simple statement of accounts for the expenditure of the so for spent amount along with grant-in-aid bill towards the second instalment.

6.4 The Overhead Charges to the affiliating institution will be released after the acceptance of Final Report along with the receipt of the final audited Statement of Accounts and Utilisation Certificate in prescribed formats which are verified by the ICSSR.

6.5 The Project Director will ensure that the expenditure incurred by him conforms to the approved budget heads and relevant rules.  Audited Statement of accounts with Utilization Certificate in GFR of 12A form is for the entire project amount approved for the project.

7. Monitoring of Research Projects

7.1 Research undertaken by a Project Director will be reviewed through the submission of periodic progress reports in the prescribed format and the project may be discontinued/terminated if research progress is found unsatisfactory or any ICSSR rules are violated.

7.2 The scholar/awardee must acknowledge the support of ICSSR in all their publications resulting from the project output such as Research Paper, Journal Articles, Articles in edited Books etc., and must submit a copy of the same to the ICSSR during the course or after completion of the project. If, in case of no acknowledgements by the scholars, they will be block listed and will not be able to apply for any schemes of ICSSR in the future. Papers published in Conference/Seminar proceedings will not be considered as they are not peer reviewed. However, proceedings published by Scopus indexed / UGC care listed journals can be considered.

7.3 All project related queries will be addressed to the Project Director/ Affiliating Institution for their timely reply. 

7.4 The ICSSR may, at any time ask for verification of accounts and other relevant documents related to the Project. 

7.5 The ICSSR reserves the right to change the affiliation if it is found that the affiliating institute is not co-operating with the scholar and it is not facilitating timely completion of the study.

7.6 Final report submitted by the Project Director is mandatorily evaluated by an Expert appointed by the ICSSR before considering the release of the final instalment.

7.7 The Project Director shall be personally responsible for timely completion of the Project. The Project proposal/final report cannot be submitted for the award of any University degree/diploma or funding by any Institution by any member of the project staff, including the Project Director. The ICSSR however, will have no objection if any member of the project staff utilizes the project data for this purpose.

7.8 If the scholars are not submitting the requisite documents and the final report in timely or not completing the project in a stipulated period, the scholars will be block listed and the legal recourse will be initiated.

7.9 As per the directions of the Ministry of Education (MoE) the amount of grant sanctioned is to be utilized within the duration of the project. Any amount of the grant remaining unspent shall be refunded to the ICSSR immediately after the expiry of the duration of the project. If the grantee fails to utilize the grant for the purpose for which the same has been sanctioned/or fails to submit the audited statement of expenditure within the stipulated period, the grantee will be required to refund the amount of the grant with interest thereon @ 10% per annum.

8.  Completion of the Study 

8.1 On completion of the study, the Project Director should submit:

• Final report in a publishable form (Softcopies in both PDF and word format);
• Abstract in 500 words (Softcopies in both PDF and word format);
• Executive Summary of the final report in 5000 words (Softcopies in both PDF and word format);
• Similarity index sheet (Plagiarism check) for the final report.

8.2 After acceptance of the report by the ICSSR, upon incorporating the suggested changes if any, the Project Director should submit:

• Soft copy of modified final report (in both PDF and word format) along with two hard copies;
• Five copies of executive summary;
• Softcopies of (if any) Data Sets, along with well-defined definition of data and other important information for documentation.

8.3 ICSSR gets every report checked for plagiarism and the similarity report is also generated.  As a policy, ICSSR does not accept contents beyond 10 per cent on similarity index.  Scholars are required to get their final as well modified report checked on their own for similarity index and attach a report of the same at the time of submission. 

8.4 The final report submitted by the scholar will be considered as satisfactory only after final recommendation of acceptance by the expert appointed by the ICSSR.

9. Obligations of the Affiliating Institution

9.1 The affiliating institution is required to give an undertaking in the prescribed format contained in the Application Form to administer and manage the ICSSR grant.

9.2 It is also required to provide the requisite research infrastructure to the scholar and maintain proper accounts.

9.3 The affiliating institution shall open / maintain a dedicated bank account for ICSSR grant (Scheme Code-0877) that is duly registered at EAT Module of PFMS portal for release of the Project Grant without any delay.

9.4 The affiliating institution will be under obligation to ensure submission of the final report and an Audited Statement of Accounts and Utilization Certificate, (in the prescribed Proforma GFR 12-A) duly certified by the Competent authority of the institution including the refund of any unspent balance. The affiliating institution shall make suitable arrangements for preservation of data such as filled in schedules, tabulation sheets, manuscripts, reports, etc. relating to the study. The ICSSR reserves the right to demand raw data, or such parts of the study as it deems fit.

9.5 In case a scholar leaves /discontinues/dies during project before completion of the tenure, the affiliating institution shall immediately inform ICSSR, settle the accounts including the refund of any unspent balance within a year of submission.

10.  Other Conditions

10.1 The duration of the project shall be a maximum period of two years for Major Projects and one year for Minor Projects which includes the time for Final Report writing. In case of exceptional circumstances, an extension may be granted by the ICSSR without any additional financial burden on being satisfied about the progress of the work including quality publication. If the extension is required, the Project Director needs to request at least three months prior to the completion for no-cost extension with a copy of the progress made, reason for the delay by justifying the extension. Retrospective extension will not be permitted.

10.2 The contingency grant may be utilized for stationery, computer typing related costs, specialised assistance such as data analysis and consultation for field trip etc., related to the research work.

10.3 Defaulters of any previous fellowship/project/grant of the ICSSR will not be eligible for consideration. 

10.4 No scholar will be allowed to take up a research project along with any ICSSR fellowship.

10.5 Foreign trip is not permissible within the awarded budget of a project. However, the Project Director may undertake data collection outside India in exceptional cases and if warranted by the needs of the proposal. For this he/she is required to apply separately for consideration under the Data Collection Scheme of the ICSSR International Collaboration Division but any rejection there should not have any bearing on the study and cannot be taken as an excuse.

10.6 Any request for additional grant in excess of the sanctioned budget will not `be considered. 

10.7 Purchase of equipment/ assets for the research Project is permissible only if it is originally proposed and approved by the ICSSR and does not exceed the permissible amount and follows the rules of the affiliating institution.

 10.8   The project director cannot make any changes in the research design at any stage.

10.9 Regarding Transfer of a Project/Appointment of substitute Project Director:

• On the request from a university/institute, the ICSSR may permit the appointment of a Substitute Project Director in exceptional circumstances.
• The ICSSR may also appoint a Substitute Project Director if it is convinced that the original awardee of the Project will not be in a position to carry out the study successfully.
• The ICSSR may transfer the place of the Project from one affiliating institution to another subject to submission of the following:
• Satisfactory progress report (s);
• No objection certificate from both previous and the new university/institute;
• Audited statement of account and utilization certificate along with unspent balance, if any.

However, no transfer of project / Project director should be requested in the last six months of the study.

• Overhead charges will be apportioned proportionally among the institutes as per the grant released or as may be finally decided by the ICSSR.
• In case of superannuation of Project Director and if the rules of the institution so require the transfer of the project to a serving faculty member may be done with prior approval of the ICSSR.  The credit of Project shall belong to the original submitting Project Director.

10.10 Consideration under other call(s) would require a fresh proposal.

10.11 The Council reserves the right to reject any application without assigning any reason. It will not be responsible for any postal delays/loss.

10.12 Incomplete applications in any respect will not be considered.

10.13 The final authority related to the interpretation of the guidelines or any issue left is vested with the ICSSR.

10.14 No queries will be entertained by the ICSSR Secretariat until the final declaration of results against a call. Any lobbying for award will lead to disqualification.

10.15 While accepting Research Project from the ICSSR, an awardee should not accept any other fellowship or research project or assignment from any other institution.

10.16 The ICSSR reserves all rights to publish the project funded by it, provided the work is recommended for publication by ICSSR appointed expert/experts.

• Special Call for Short-term Empirical Research 2023-24
• Research Programmes
• Special Call for Studies of the culture, history and geography of the Scheduled Tribes
• Special Call for Research Studies on Social Science Dimensions of Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic

Areas of Excellence Scheme 2024/25 (Twelfth Round) Theme-based Research Scheme 2024/25 (Fourteenth Round) Call for Preliminary Proposals

The Research Grants Council (RGC) is inviting the eight University Grants Committee (UGC)-funded universities to submit preliminary proposals for the Areas of Excellence (AoE) Scheme 2024/25 (Twelfth Round) and the Theme-based Research Scheme (TRS) 2024/25 (Fourteenth Round).

Objectives of the Schemes

2. The AoE Scheme aims at enabling the UGC-funded universities to build upon their existing strengths and develop them into areas of excellence. The scheme intends to support both basic and applied research of high academic merit. The scope of a proposal should be broad and long term, and at the same time sufficiently focused. Research collaboration is one of the core requirements for a proposed AoE, and both inter-institutional collaboration projects and inter-disciplinary projects within the same university are encouraged. A successful proposal should involve a combination of research and teaching, and should aim to:

be inter-disciplinary (if it is based on one distinct discipline, it must address a wide range of specific problems);

address a broad range of inter-related issues through a well-defined set of research problems;

show a clear sense of purpose, direction and priorities.

3. Starting from the 2022/23 exercise, the AoE Scheme was repositioned to primarily fund major projects outside the four themes and grand challenge topics of the TRS, including but not limited to inter-disciplinary projects involving collaboration with / among humanities and social sciences disciplines. The parameters of the AoE Scheme, including the maximum direct project cost, project duration and project monitoring mechanism, have been synchronised with the TRS.

4. The objective of the TRS is to focus academic research efforts of the UGC-funded universities on themes of strategic importance to the long-term development of Hong Kong.

5. TRS applications should be made under one of the research themes and one of the grand challenge topics under the respective theme. To enhance Hong Kong’s competitive advantages and better integration into the overall national development, the RGC completed a review on themes and grand challenge topics of the TRS in June 2022. Two new topics, namely “Quantum Technology” and “Integrated Circuits” were added to Theme 4 “Advancing Emerging Research and Innovations Important to Hong Kong” from the 2023/24 exercise onwards. The four themes and 20 grand challenge topics are listed below:

Transfer of Proposals Between AoE Scheme And TRS

6. The transfer arrangement between the AoE Scheme and the TRS will continue in the 2024/25 exercise. If the RGC finds that a TRS preliminary proposal does not fall under the themes and grand challenge topics of the TRS, the RGC will transfer the proposal directly to the AoE Scheme exercise. Similarly, an AoE proposal will be transferred to the TRS exercise directly if it falls under the themes and grand challenge topics of the TRS. The decision of the RGC will be final. There is no need for the applicant to fill in another application form in case of transfer.

7. Because of the transfer mechanism, an applicant is only allowed to submit one application in the capacity of Project Coordinator (PC) under either the AoE Scheme or the TRS in the same exercise. A single application form will be used for the two schemes. The applicant should explain in the application why the proposal fits the scheme chosen and consent to the transfer arrangement. In addition, an applicant is not permitted to submit the same proposal to both the AoE Scheme / TRS and the Strategic Topics Grant in the same exercise. If such is found, the proposal submitted to the AoE Scheme / TRS will not be processed.

"Exploratory Option"

8. There is an “Exploratory Option” under both the AoE Scheme and the TRS starting from the 2022/23 exercise. The objective of the “Exploratory Option” is to allow the RGC to invest into high-risk (i.e. not fulfilling all assessment criteria especially on readiness of preliminary data and the team’s credentials) yet potentially ground-breaking and highly-original research. The exploratory projects will be given one-year budget on pro rata basis and a duration of one year to yield preliminary results. The PCs of exploratory projects will need to submit a fresh application and compete with other proposals on equal footing in the subsequent funding cycle.

9. The “Exploratory Option” is discretionary. There is no need for the applicants to specify the exploratory nature of their proposals. The relevant Selection Panel may exercise the “Exploratory Option” for projects that are not funded due to the lack of preliminary supporting data and / or inadequate past experience as reflected in their teams’ credential and are deemed to be potentially ground-breaking, i.e. demonstrating high level of originality and / or innovation in transforming research approaches, standards, theories and / or methods, engaging novel disciplinary or inter-disciplinary perspectives, as well as having sufficient potentials in yielding results.

Assessment Criteria

10. The criteria for assessing AoE proposals are grouped under the following four primary “filters”:

qualification as world-leading by international standards and as an area of excellence;

credentials and resources of the project team;

existence of a clear strategy; and

sound structure for an area of excellence.

11. Each of the four “filters” carries the same weight. Among the assessment criteria, considerable emphasis will be placed on both the prospects of a proposed AoE attaining international excellence and its relevance to the social and economic development of Hong Kong in the long run.

12. The preliminary TRS proposals will be assessed based on the following criteria:

qualification as world-leading by international standards;

impact to Hong Kong;

credentials of the project team;

sound structure for an excellent research project.

13. Details of the assessment criteria are described on pages 3 to 5 of the "Guidance Documents on Submission of Preliminary Proposals" (Guidance Documents) .

Declaration of Time Commitments by PCs

14. To understand more about the applicant’s research efforts, an applicant is required to provide the numbers of both on-going individual research projects and on-going collaborative research projects being held by him / her in any capacity. If the PC holds more than three on-going individual research projects or more than two on-going collaborative research projects, he / she should provide the overall amount of time spent on research in percentage terms and justifications on how he / she would be able to take up this additional research project if funded while maintaining the research quality.

Preliminary Proposals

15. General information and guidelines to applicants for preparing and submitting preliminary proposals are set out in the Guidance Documents attached to this Call Circular. The Guidance Documents also include the "Preliminary Proposal Application Form Template" .

16. All applications must be submitted to the UGC Secretariat through the Research Office of the coordinating university by 5:00 pm on 21 September 2023 . Please provide two hard copies and one soft copy of the proposals (allowing search function with size up to 5MB per proposal). The soft copy should contain all the information as presented in the hard copy. Please save all files in one CD or one USB memory stick, with the file names identical to the project reference number specified on page 3 of the Guidance Documents.

Shortlisting Results

17. Universities will be informed of the shortlisting results and invited to submit full proposals in late December 2023. The funding decision will be announced in around July 2024.

Code of Conduct and Handling of Information and Personal Data

18. The RGC is fully committed to the principle of honesty, integrity and fair play in the conduct of its business. To uphold public trust and protect public interest, all applications should comply with the RGC Code of Conduct which is available on the RGC website: https://www.ugc.edu.hk/doc/eng/rgc/guidelines/code/code_of_conduct.pdf .

19. The guidelines for the handling of information and personal data contained in the applications are available on the RGC website: https://www.ugc.edu.hk/doc/eng/rgc/form/GRF2.pdf .

20. Enquiries about this call and other related matters about the AoE Scheme and the TRS should be directed to the Research Offices of the coordinating universities, which, if in doubt, should consult the UGC Secretariat for clarification. Also, correspondence regarding AoE and TRS matters including enquiries, appeals and complaints should be made through the Research Offices of the coordinating universities. Their contact details are as follows:

RGC July 2023

• About the Project

• Last Date : 31/08/2015
• Site will not available between 2.30PM to 3.30PM on 10/10/2013
• Eligibility
• Declaration Certificate

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Annexure-II FORMAT FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL FOR MINOR RESEARCH PROJECT PART-A

Related Papers

NAGAIAH THANDU , Narsimha Swamy Pasham

In this paper, the notion of anti fuzzy ideals in near subtraction semigroups is introduced and investigated some related properties.

Bhavanari Satyanarayana , Mohiddin Shaik

Florentin Smarandache

Claudia Ferreira

Dr. NIMMAGADDA VENKATA NAGENDRAM

Near field spaces over near-field

Jaya Lakshmi

Suppose that a semiprime (-1, 1) ring R is associative, satisfies the ascending chain condition for the right annihilators of the form r(w), where w belongs to the nucleus N(R) and R contains no infinite direct sums of nonzero right ideals. Then the right quotient ring of R relative to the subset W = fw 2 N(R)=w is regular in Rg exist and it is semisimple and artinian. Also if A be a nonassociative complex Banach algebra which satisfies ascending chain condition on left ideals and assume that the center Z(A) of A consists of regular elements then Z(A)  C. As a result if A be a (-1, 1) noetherian complex Banach algebra then A is finite-dimensional.

Journal of Mathematical Sciences

A. Tuganbaev

Journal of Algebra

RESEARCH INDIA PUBLICATIONS NEW DELHI 110 089 INDIA 2012

RELATED PAPERS

Khalda Salsabila

Frontiers in Genetics

Emanuele Buratti

Cadernos Saúde Coletiva

Maria da Consolação Magalhães

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Isaac Silvera

Jean-François Debongnie

edebiyatdergisi.hacettepe.edu.tr

Cemal Sakallı cmsakalli

Physics Today

Brett Isham

Paloma Mata Codesal

Vibrational Spectroscopy

Jair Aguiar

Evaluating Evidence of Mechanisms in Medicine

Jon Williamson

Liridonna Mustafa

Simonetta Balsamo

Cordula Seger

Frontiers in Climate

2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Alex Alekseyenko

Revista Heterotópica

Vanice Sargentini

PsycEXTRA Dataset

Bhagwant Persaud

Muneeb Ullah

F. Huber, Zeitreisen unter Wasser. Spektakuläre Entdeckungen zwischen Ostsee und Bodensee.

Ruth Blankenfeldt

International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies

Enunciación

Maria Seguel

Nipissing学位证 尼皮辛大学毕业证

Hortscience

Entin Daningsih

Matthieu Gosse

See More Documents Like This

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024