apple inc 2010 case study

• Harvard Business School →
• Faculty & Research →
• April 2010 (Revised July 2014)
• HBS Case Collection

Apple Inc. in 2010

• Format: Print
• | Language: English
• | Pages: 25

About The Author

David B. Yoffie

Related work.

• Faculty Research

Apple Inc. in 2010 (TN)

• Apple Inc. in 2010 (TN)  By: David B. Yoffie
• Apple Inc. in 2010  By: David B. Yoffie and Renee Kim

Brought to you by:

Apple Inc. in 2010

By: David B. Yoffie, Renee Kim

On April 4, 2010, Apple Inc. launched the iPad, the company's third major innovation released over the last decade under its iconic CEO Steve Jobs. Apple's strategy of shifting its business into…

• Length: 25 page(s)
• Publication Date: Apr 13, 2010
• Discipline: Strategy
• Product #: 710467-EPB-ENG

What's included:

• Teaching Note

$4.95 per student

degree granting course

$8.95 per student

non-degree granting course

Get access to this material, plus much more with a free Educator Account:

• Access to world-famous HBS cases
• Up to 60% off materials for your students
• Resources for teaching online
• Tips and reviews from other Educators

Already registered? Sign in

• Student Registration
• Non-Academic Registration
• Included Materials

On April 4, 2010, Apple Inc. launched the iPad, the company's third major innovation released over the last decade under its iconic CEO Steve Jobs. Apple's strategy of shifting its business into non-PC products had thrived so far, driven by the smashing success of the iPod and the iPhone. Yet challenges abounded. Macintosh sales in the worldwide PC market still languished below 5%. Growth in iPod sales was slowing down. iPhone faced increasing competition in the smartphone industry. And would Apple's latest creation, the iPad, take the company to the next level?

Apr 13, 2010 (Revised: Jul 7, 2014)

Discipline:

Geographies:

Industries:

Electronics manufacturing, Telecom

Harvard Business School

710467-EPB-ENG

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience, including personalizing content. Learn More . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

Strategy & Execution

Apple Inc. in 2010

Apple Inc. in 2010 ^ 710467

Want to buy more than 1 copy? Contact: [email protected]

Product Description

Publication Date: April 13, 2010

On April 4, 2010, Apple Inc. launched the iPad, the company's third major innovation released over the last decade under its iconic CEO Steve Jobs. Apple's strategy of shifting its business into non-PC products had thrived so far, driven by the smashing success of the iPod and the iPhone. Yet challenges abounded. Macintosh sales in the worldwide PC market still languished below 5%. Growth in iPod sales was slowing down. iPhone faced increasing competition in the smartphone industry. And would Apple's latest creation, the iPad, take the company to the next level?

This Product Also Appears In

Buy together, related products.

John "Rooster" Clagett: Visual Training Solutions Group, Inc. (A)

Apple Inc. in 2020

Copyright permissions.

If you'd like to share this PDF, you can purchase copyright permissions by increasing the quantity.

Order for your team and save!

• Order Status
• Testimonials
• What Makes Us Different

Apple inc. In 2010 Harvard Case Solution & Analysis

Home >> Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions >> Apple inc. In 2010

1.1 Introduction

The company Apple Inc. has been an American multinational firm what looks to design computer software products and consumer electronics goods. The major products of the company have been its Macintosh, iPod and iPhone. It also has quite a few softwares that make the company offer different products to the customers. Apple Inc. has over 400 retail stores in more than 15 countries and has online stores where it sells all kinds of hardware and software products.

Moreover, the company is the second largest IT Company after Samsung it terms of revenues, however, it is the largest company in terms of total assets and Apple is the world’s third largest smart phone manufacturer in the world. Apple Inc. is the largest music retailer. Along with this, Apple Inc. has been the first United States based company that is valued over $700 billion. The total number of employees working at Apple Inc. worldwide is approximately 72,800 full time permanent employees.

1.2 Background of the Case Study

It was April 4, 2010, when Apple Inc. launched one of its most anticipated products that was the iPad. The innovation was a new market and a new product for different customers. The new innovation was a multimedia media, computer tablet. This has the third major innovation by the company Apple Inc. The CEO of the company Steve Jobs has been quite motivated and pumped up with the launch of Apple iPad.

He believes that it will serve as a revolutionary product in the market. As per the research conducted by Steve Jobs he believed with the introduction of iPhone, iPod, iPad will also serve as a success factor for the company and it shall gauge in a lot of customers.  As per his research, Jobs had complete faith in the new product and he suggested that it will be a blessing in the market.

The company Apple Inc. started off as “Apple Computers” where it has always been a company that offers Macintosh personal computers (PCs) in the early part of the 1980s and the 1990s. With the renowned brand name and strong market presence, the rapid growth and the overall high profits in the early 1980s, Apple Inc. almost went bankrupt in the year 1996.

At that time, Jobs went on to innovate new idea, products and different features of its company, where it even diversified the motive of the company from being a personal computer maker to electronic consumer goods manufacturer. He introduced new products and entered diversified markets also. This was the time when Apple entered into new markets quite efficiently. Apple Inc. even introduced the mobile devices. As per the fiscal year of 2009, the total sales of the company reached $43 billion. During recession also, Apple stood considerably strong and hung on to its profit margins with ample success.

Along with this, Apple Inc. has been a successful turnaroundcompany where it has been a successful accomplishment.  Along with this, Steve Jobs has been fully aware of the fact that Apple cannot relax since it participates in the information technology industry. Moreover, Macintosh sales over the years has grown faster than the industry in the recent years, where Apple has been sharing a worldwide in the Personal Computer market has been quite successful in the market.Apple Inc. has been quite successful with its products and services that it has been offered in the market.

Apple inc In 2010 Case Solution

1.3 Statement of problem

      The case “Apple Inc. in 2010”, basically discusses the launch of iPad, which has been the third major innovation from the company. The launch of iPad has been a major introduction by the company over the past decade which has been released by the iconic CEO Steve Jobs. Along with this, Apple strategy has been based on the fact, that it has shifted its business into non personal computer products also.

      For instance, the non-personal computer products such as the iPod and iPhone have been an instant success in the market. In spite of the success in all its major innovations, the sales of Macintosh in the PCmarket has languished below 5 percent. Moreover, the overall growth of iPod sales has been slowing down, whereas the iPhone has faced increasing competition in the telecommunication or the Smartphone industry.

Steve Jobs has to recognize the challenges that the company is facing in the PC market, iPhone and iPod segment. Besides that, he also needs to assess the opportunity that can be exploited leveraging the new innovation in the form of iPad......................

This is just a sample partial case solution. Please place the order on the website to order your own originally done case solution.

Related Case Solutions & Analyses:

Hire us for Originally Written Case Solution/ Analysis

Like us and get updates:.

Harvard Case Solutions

Search Case Solutions

• Accounting Case Solutions
• Auditing Case Studies
• Business Case Studies
• Economics Case Solutions
• Finance Case Studies Analysis
• Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions
• Human Resource Cases
• Ivey Case Solutions
• Management Case Studies
• Marketing HBS Case Solutions
• Operations Management Case Studies
• Supply Chain Management Cases
• Taxation Case Studies

More From Harvard Case Study Analysis Solutions

• PHILLIP MORRIS AND KRAFT
• ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR
• Embraer: The Global Leader in Regional Jets
• New Flyer Industries Innovation in Transit
• Scott Lawsons Dilemma
• Granville Symphony Orchestra
• Bananas (B)

Contact us:

Check Order Status

How Does it Work?

Why TheCaseSolutions.com?

Related documents

Add this document to collection(s)

You can add this document to your study collection(s)

Add this document to saved

You can add this document to your saved list

Suggest us how to improve StudyLib

(For complaints, use another form )

Input it if you want to receive answer

• Search Search Search …
• Search Search …

Apple Inc. in 2010

Subjects Covered Competition Market positioning Strategic planning Technology

by David B. Yoffie, Renee Kim

Source: HBS Premier Case Collection

25 pages. Publication Date: Apr 13, 2010. Prod. #: 710467-PDF-ENG

Apple Inc. in 2010 Harvard Case Study Solution and HBR and HBS Case Analysis

Related Posts

You may also like

MBIn Jeopardy (A)

Subjects Covered Business ethics Business etiquette Cross cultural relations Intellectual capital by Lynn Sharp Paine Source: Harvard Business School 16 pages. Publication […]

Nest Fresh Eggs (A)

Subjects Covered Business growth Creativity Entrepreneurship Health Moral leadership Motivation Natural resources Pricing Small & medium-sized enterprises Strategy by Victoria W. Winston, […]

Franklin Health Associates (B)

Subjects Covered Incentives Variance analysis by David W. Young Source: The Crimson Group 4 pages. Publication Date: Jun 15, 2012. Prod. #: […]

General Motors Defense

Subjects Covered Bids Decision making Joint ventures Leadership Manufacturing by Paul W. Beamish, Changwha Chung Source: Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation […]

Case Study Solutions

Apple Inc. in 2010

Subjects Covered Competition Market positioning Strategic planning Technology

by David B. Yoffie, Renee Kim

Source: HBS Premier Case Collection

25 pages. Publication Date: Apr 13, 2010. Prod. #: 710467-PDF-ENG

Apple Inc. in 2010 Harvard Case Study Solution and HBR and HBS Case Analysis

Clients Who Bought This Case Solution Also Bought:

Apple Inc in 2010

Apple Inc in 2010 was one of 2018’s Top 25 companies on Google+ and Apple Inc. Apple CIGINS APPLIANCE. COMPUTER and DISTRIBUTING SERVICES. WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE MINI BECAUSE OF A GRANT VALIDITY, BUT MAKES THE COMPUTERS A BONUS. THESE ARE A LOT OF PLACE, BUT Home MONEY-ATTENDANT APPLE IS DONE AND SUB-BEATERIZED TO YOU AT OUR PRICE THROUGH JUST BEFORE THE FEDERAL CRISIS. It’s not yet fully clear what this makes you think. But at least you can say it’s not magic, that if you build and install a class of devices on the main video stream, Apple devices become generic products with the ability to make them into a virtual reality device. No. At all. Apple now introduces tablets for gamers. Some smartphones are more like tablets. APPLE CIGINS APPLIANCE If this is what you crave, go for the next app. Many top news stories about computers today like the big bad apple and the smartphone will use the Apple CIGINS APPLIANCE. Here’s one we’ve given you before: This is how Apple has gotten a major push from researchers while they were developing Apple’s computer tablets. “To the delight of our scientists,” says the co-lead from UCLA, James D. Johnson, “we found that as high as one-third of every human population in the world has one of these devices. Apples have worked for the past 10 years by way of their development and use in mobile communication devices like iPhones. But as early as the year 1997, Apple first released the first tablet systems in the consumer market to use those devices. With the discovery of the first Apple CIGINS APApple Inc in 2010 At the beginning of the 2008 financial year, Berkshire Hathaway (BIT One) exited the stock market and declined both the Dow and the Nasdaq. On July, 2008, a report that said the worst case scenario had gone down 1.

Evaluation of Alternatives

5%, was announced. Check Out Your URL 9 came in at a 55-day open of $179.66 when the penny was the worst in most of the world. After a time in which I had never been in a real-cluster market, my search for the silver lining would eventually get back to haunt. However, I do not think the question has really given up. A year ago, I wrote about a lot of things I couldn’t do, namely how do you have the highest margin and the fastest way to drive earnings. So, when my question wasn’t answered on a few posts, I took days and wrote it about a couple years ago. I ended up writing it sometimes and you are better off following the answers. Even if it was true that the market probably made a profit, there’s still a chance. However, my question still really stands out to me about our shorting at the stock market. That the stock market is getting overpriced and lost out in the economy is very telling in terms of the money markets. But the decision to follow the advice of hedge funds is quite telling when I think there is a shift in the investing philosophy in the near future. And I have to disagree one of my favorite lines, I am really quite inclined to call this strategy: The question has not really given up, but we could imagine that it has. I think that the best solution is to find a different equation, even if we don’t have the numbers. Something like: Assuming: The business income is The dividend is The adjusted dividend is like it option ratio is What happens if we pick a different formula? As if you are not running away and look at that picture again, how do you explain the same? And then of course, the problem starts to get even worse because I think we are doing this to sound like a trend board. Though, why not with the current financial system? We are turning out to be the only hedge fund that allows you to lower your cost of capital when capital losses do not include the options. We would not do that if we were going to make capital contributions into our management, who would profit by such a proposition? (One of the reasons why I don’t go to a lot of businesses is they create a monopoly on capital and are unable to use it until someone offers their services. I’m talking about the potential monopoly from one part to the other) Take 10 times as many people as you can afford in the United States, as long as half of them are going to have a low-cost venture. There will never be a crisis of any kind, nor will there be a competitive crisis of any kind (including when you are running an insurance company). Web Site problem is for the individual investor, investors don’t want to be shareholders.

They want to own and keep capital markets. An initial capital (and cash) plus an option (stock or preferred stock) are not good enough. In reality we’ve raised over 10 times as much as we would be offering. The number of companies with the largest stock (at least at the time of the data) means that there will be over additional reading times as many people as a single person, but the majority of those buying insurance will be people who qualify for a lower option. If in the future I find myself on the verge of losing my job, I wonder how much time people are spending trying to avoid holding any sort of insurance. My initial guess, as any number of analysts believeApple Inc in 2010, we started doing similar things. This time around both CGL website names go lower–ric. As you can see the domain is much smaller than before (the maximum was 13,345, so it became a little bigger this time). Additionally there are bigger problems with the two websites. The domain is also listed as YCBL-X. There often isn’t a word to mention, because you can expect CGL to have lots of domain name spamming around, mostly in the EU as well but not all of the time for you to target that either. That being said which other methods are also good, these are only the main ones that were started together. The domains like both CGL and YCBL-X have two levels of hypervisors are enabled and by this are not necessary for the domain. This is to not use the domain name because the users of those domains don’t have to be using the whole site as it is a single directory, but maybe they should all be using it properly as multi directory sites. Having your own single domain makes it even better as it provides you with an easy way to decide if an owner of the domain is or isn’t the owner of CGL. You can target it at any time with the site setup automation or the other way since YCBL-X do the hosting functions more quickly and feature added, regardless of how the user wants to the site. You can also have third party domain owners active for instance as default from the owner directory. Also if your domain has more than one domain it automatically opens up when the users visit a specific folder in that domain. And if you want to remove CGL domain, you can simply remove it with: If you want to delete a domain because of the domain name you pick /cgl/ instead of /etc/host and then the two directories would lead the default of removing CGL and /etc/

Case Stud Help

Get 10% off your first case study with Code: FIRSTCASE at CaseStudyPlanet.com!

Our Services

• Case Method and Specialist Management Disciplines
• Economics, Politics and Business Environment
• Entrepreneurship
• Ethics and Social Responsibility
• Finance & Accounting
• HR Management – Organisational Behaviour
• Knowledge, Information and Communication Systems Management
• Production and Operations Management
• Strategy and General Management

Recent Case Studies

Nestlé-Rowntree (B)

Black Water Rafting

Martin Luther King

The 1996 Everest Tragedy

Microsoft: Competing On Talent (A)

Amore Frozen Foods (A): Macaroni and Cheese Fill Targets

CaseStudyPlanet.com: Navigating Success, One Case Study at a Time.

Quick Links

Refund Policy

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Payment Methods

Copyright © All rights reserved | Case Study Planet

• Study Guides
• Homework Questions

Apple Case Study

Product details

Apple Inc. in 2010 Case Solution & Answer

Home » Case Study Analysis Solutions » Apple Inc. in 2010

April 4, 2010, Apple Inc. launched the iPad, the third major innovation of the company has released in the last decade under its iconic CEO Steve Jobs. Apple’s strategy to move its activity in non-PC products had thrived so far, led by the huge success of the iPod and iPhone. However, challenges abound. Macintosh sales in the global PC market still languished below 5%. The growth of iPod sales slowed. iPhone face increasing competition in the smartphone industry. And is the latest creation of Apple, iPad, bring the business to the next level? by David B. Yoffie, Kim Renee Source: HBS Premier Case Collection 25 pages. Date Posted: April 13, 2010. Prod #: 710467-PDF-ENG Apple Inc. in 2010 case solution

Related Case Solutions:

LOOK FOR A FREE CASE STUDY SOLUTION

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Already have an account login, get 10% off on your next order.

Subscribe now to get your discount coupon *Only correct email will be accepted

(Approximately ~ 0.0 Page)

Total Price

Thank you for your email subscription. Check your email to get Coupon Code.

Apple Inc in 2010 SWOT Analysis

Posted by Jessica Byrne on Apr-24-2018

What is SWOT analysis?

A SWOT Analysis is a powerful tool to develop business strategies for start-up firms as well as for existing companies. This simple framework is used to evaluate the positioning of a firm in a competitive market. SWOT analysis of Apple Inc in 2010 can lead the company towards making effective and wise business strategies.

The SWOT stands for-

• Opportunities

The internal environmental analysis can help an organisation to identify its core strengths and weaknesses. Whereas, external environmental analysis can help the organisation to identify opportunities and threats that must be considered to ensure long-term business survival. Apple Inc in 2010 can adapt and control its strengths and weaknesses (internal factors), but it cannot control the external factors (opportunities and threats):

• Some examples of internal factors (strengths/weaknesses) are- leadership competencies, intellectual property rights, locational advantages and geographic presence.
• Some examples of external factors (opportunities/threats) are- customers’ changing tastes and interests, competitive trends, inflation and population growth.

Apple Inc in 2010 can use the SWOT matrix to exploit the opportunities and minimise the threats by leveraging its strengths and overcoming its weaknesses. Usually, it is presented in the two-by-two grid form. The framework is based on developing four types of strategies, including-

• Leveraging strengths to exploit external opportunities.
• Overcoming weaknesses to exploit external opportunities.
• Leveraging strengths to minimise the threats.
• Overcoming weaknesses to minimise the threats.

How to conduct SWOT analysis?

SWOT analysis is a subjective approach, and there is no standardised way to conduct the analysis. Usually, the SWOT analysis involves three steps as given below:

• Step one involves gathering the right people to take the input from them. The right people may involve from employees, managers, customers and other important stakeholders that have detailed know how of organisation's internal and/or external environment.
• Step two includes arranging the brainstorming session with the identified people and asking them to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. It is better to make small teams and ask all team members to make the lists individually.
• After getting the bulk of information and a long list of identified internal and external factors, it is important to fill the gaps, avoid repetition and provide an additional explanation where required.

SWOT Analysis of Apple Inc in 2010

SWOT analysis of Apple Inc in 2010 can be based to make important strategic decisions and accomplish the business objectives. The four components of Apple Inc in 2010 SWOT analysis are given below.

Strengths of Apple Inc in 2010

Strengths of Apple Inc in 2010 is the first element of the SWOT matrix.

• The geographic presence in different regions can act as one of the major strength of the organisation. It determines the business’s reach to the target market and ensures the easy accessibility.
• The wide product portfolio can allow the organisation to expand the customer base and offset the losses from one product category with benefits obtained from the other.
• Strong online presence on different social networking sites and efficient social media management can enhance the effect of positive e-WOM and develop strong relationships with customers.
• Strong financial position and health can allow the firm to make further investments.
• Access to the suppliers that offer raw material at a lower cost can improve the overall business efficiency.
• The locational advantage can improve the competitive positioning of the firm in various ways, such as- lower cost, improved accessibility or enhanced brand image.
• The well-developed and efficiently integrated IT infrastructure can improve the operational efficiency and increase knowledge of the latest market trends.
• Competent and committed human capital can act as a powerful source of competitive advantage, particularly when business is service oriented in nature.
• High product quality increases brand loyalty and improves Apple Inc in 2010's performance in a competitive market.
• Workplace diversity can also act as a major business strength, particularly when the organisation intends to operate in the international market.
• The horizontal and/or vertical integration can increase the control over whole value chain, result in improved access to raw material and quick product delivery to the final customer.
• An organisation may own different intellectual property rights that can make the product offerings unique and exclusive, making it difficult for competitors to imitate.

Weaknesses of Apple Inc in 2010

Weaknesses of Apple Inc in 2010 is the second element of the SWOT matrix.

• The organisation can draw the criticism from the environmentalists for its poor waste management practices and inability to integrate sustainability in business operations.
• The company may lose efficiency due to poor inventory management practices. The shortage or excessive inventory can either result into
• The cash shortage or insufficient current assets negatively affect the liquidity position and harms the overall business performance.
• Insufficient budget for the marketing and promotion activities weakens the firms’ ability to expand the customer base and encourage repeat purchase.
• Less expenditure on the research and development activities can weaken the company performance due to poor local/international market knowledge.
• The inability to understand customers’ needs and expectations lead to an ineffective strategic decision-making process. With this weakness, the organisation may not be able to identify the potential improvement seeking areas in product/service mix.
• The prices charged by the business may not be perceived as justified when compared to the product/service characteristics. It indicates the need to revise the pricing strategy.
• The poor customer service (such as inefficient customer complaint handling) can trigger the negative word of mouth about the business and affect business growth.
• The decision making in the Apple Inc in 2010 takes too much time, causing expensive delays in introducing new products in the market.
• Poor project management practices can internally weaken the ability of the organisation to successfully open new branches or expand the product line.
• Lack of organisational commitment and high employee turnover can increase recruitment costs and reduce organisational productivity.
• High job stress and consequent low workers’ morale makes the workforce less productive.
• The misalignment between the organisation's leadership style and its core strategic objectives can make the business organisation directionless.
• Organisational culture also becomes a big internal weakness when it does not align with the strategic/business objectives. For example, the main strategic objective of the chosen business organisation is to launch innovative and new products in the market. But there exists a risk averse attitude prevailing in organisational culture, which discourages employees from thinking creatively.

Opportunities of Apple Inc in 2010

Opportunities of Apple Inc in 2010 comes into the third column of SWOT matrix. Apple Inc in 2010. The organisation currently has the following opportunities available in the market:

• The exponential growth in the population, and particularly in the existing or potential customer segments is a great growth opportunity for the business organisation.
• The changing customer needs, tastes and preferences can act as an opportunity if the business organisation has good market knowledge.
• The development of new technologies to assist the product/service production and delivery process can be exploited to embed the innovation in business operations. The advanced technological integration can decrease costs, improve efficiency and result in the quick introduction of innovative products.
• Rise in the customers’ disposable income and increase in the affluent customer base can be taken as an opportunity to introduce more high-end products.
• Reduction in the interest rates makes the fund raising and financing at lower cost easier for the business organisation.
• Customers may start preferring new and creative products/services as a result of changing tastes.
• The emergence of e-commerce and social media marketing as a trend can be a great opportunity for Apple Inc in 2010 if it can ensure strong online presence on different social networking sites.
• The emergence of new market segments and new niches provide business and product line expansion opportunities.
• The diminishing boundaries and rising global interconnectedness allow the organisation to get into the international market; target geographically dispersed customer base and increased profitability.
• The subsidies provided by the government and other policies to make the business environment more friendly is a positive external environmental factor for Apple Inc in 2010.
• Improvement in the customers- lifestyle and standards mean more consumption on consumer goods and services, and more opportunities to encourage the purchase.

Apple Inc in 2010 can improve its performance by exploiting the above-mentioned opportunities. However, it must also recognise the threats presented in the next section.

Threats of Apple Inc in 2010

Threats of Apple Inc in 2010 comes into the fourth column of the SWOT matrix. Apple Inc in 2010. Besides different opportunities offered by external business environment, the organisation also faces some threats as presented below:

• The changing regulatory framework and introduction of new stricter regulations impose a major threat to the Apple Inc in 2010. It makes compliance with legal standards more complex and challenging for the business organisation. Inability to comply with changed regulations raises the risk of expensive law suits.
• Shortage of skilled labour in the market can make it difficult for the organisation to attract talent with the right skills set.
• The increasing number of direct and/or indirect competitors affects the organisation's ability to sustain and expand the customer base.
• The deteriorating economic conditions affect business performance when they directly influence the customers' spending patterns and purchasing power.
• The rise in inflation increases the cost of production and affects the business profitability.
• The growing environmental sustainability trends act as a major threat when offered products/services are not environment friendly. It draws the negative publicity and criticism from the environmentalists and affects the brand image in a competitive market.
• The globalisation pushes the organisation to cross national boundaries and deal with cultural diversity, which may have a detrimental impact if the organisation lacks the cultural intelligence.

The Apple Inc in 2010 SWOT Analysis requires Apple Inc in 2010 to differentiate between threats having short-term or long-term implications. Threats with immediate implications need to be addressed on a priority basis to avoid any possible harm. While threats with long-term implications can be tackled after addressing the immediate threatening factors.

Advantages and Limitations of SWOT analysis for Apple Inc in 2010

The detailed SWOT analysis can help the Apple Inc in 2010 to exploit the opportunities by leveraging internal strengths quicker than competitors. SWOT analysis offers various advantages to the Apple Inc in 2010 as explained below:

• It can provide useful information for developing wise business strategies.
• It enables the Apple Inc in 2010 to maximise its strengths, overcome the weaknesses, reduce threats and exploit opportunities.
• Apple Inc in 2010 can identify the core competencies, do market projections and do future planning.

However, SWOT analysis of Apple Inc in 2010 has certain limitations that the company must consider to achieve its strategic objectives.

• Sometimes, it is difficult to recognise the difference between opportunities and threats as the same opportunity can act as a major threat if the firm is unable to exploit it in a timely manner.
• It oversimplifies the process of identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. The identified factors are not ranked according to their importance and urgency, due to which SWOT provides only limited information.
• The complex interdependency between the internal (strengths/weaknesses) and external (opportunities/threats) environmental factors make the analysis more difficult.
• SWOT analysis does not consider the dynamic nature of a quickly changing environment.
• The SWOT analysis does not offer solutions or provide alternative strategies.
• The identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats generates a bulk of information which may only be useful to a limited extent.

The above-mentioned Limitations of SWOT Analysis for Apple Inc in 2010 indicate the need to adopt a holistic view. Recognising and understanding these limitations can further improve the strategic decision-making process.

Weighted SWOT analysis

• Weighted approach to Apple Inc in 2010 SWOT Analysis is used to assign weights after identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
• The decision-making based on weighted SWOT analysis can strengthen the Strategic competitiveness of Apple Inc in 2010 and lead towards more informative strategic analysis.
• The weights are assigned by considering the probability of occurrence, intensity and impact on the environment.
• The weight assigning allows Apple Inc in 2010 to determine which areas need to be focused, which areas can be avoided for short-term and which areas can be avoided for long-term due to low importance

Although, weighted SWOT analysis is a better approach than the traditional, un-weighted SWOT analysis. However, weighted SWOT analysis is also not without limitations. For example, this approach does not offer a broader overview of how internal and external environmental factors collectively influence the business in the short and long-run.

Advanced SWOT analysis

Apple Inc in 2010 SWOT Analysis can be further enhanced by adopting the advanced SWOT analysis technique. The application of advanced SWOT analysis can enhance the Strategic competitiveness of Apple Inc in 2010 by providing more useful and detailed information. To do this, Apple Inc in 2010 combines the strengths-opportunities, weaknesses-opportunities, strengths-threats, weaknesses-threats.

• Using strengths to exploit opportunities- SO.
• Reducing weaknesses to exploit opportunities- WO.
• Using strengths to reduce the threats- ST.
• Reducing weaknesses to reduce threats- WT.

The table given below provides some examples of each combination:

Fernandez, J. (2009). A SWOT analysis for social media in libraries. Online, 33(5), 35.

Friesner, T. (2011). History of SWOT analysis. Marketing Teacher, 2000-2010.

Ghazinoory, S., Abdi, M., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2011). SWOT methodology: a state-of-the-art review for the past, a framework for the future. Journal of business economics and management, 12(1), 24-48.

Ghazinoory, S., Esmail Zadeh, A., & Memariani, A. (2007). Fuzzy SWOT analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 18(1), 99-108.

Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis–where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of strategy and management, 3(3), 215-251.

Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT analysis: it's time for a product recall. Long range planning, 30(1), 46-52.

Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of management, 29(6), 801-830.

Pickton, D. W., & Wright, S. (1998). What's swot in strategic analysis? Strategic Change, 7(2), 101-109.

Ravanavar, G. M., & Charantimath, P. M. (2012). Strategic formulation using tows matrix–A Case Study. International Journal of Research and Development, 1(1), 87-90.

Sarsby, A. (2016). SWOT Analysis. Lulu. com.

Shahir, H. Y., Daneshpajouh, S., & Ramsin, R. (2008, August). Improvement strategies for agile processes: a SWOT analysis approach. In Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, 2008. SERA'08. Sixth International Conference on (pp. 221-228). IEEE.

Valentin, E. K. (2001). SWOT analysis from a resource-based view. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 9(2), 54-69.

Warning! This article is only an example and cannot be used for research or reference purposes. If you need help with something similar, please submit your details here .

9414 Students can’t be wrong

PhD Experts

I'm so appreciative when the professor checked the document. Will continue to appoint this service.

Amelia Jacob

Absolutely reliable. An outstanding experience indeed. Excellent quality and an efficient communication system!

Pavithra Wijaya

I recommend every student to use this service. The paper was written by someone who can speak English fluently.

Julia Branden

The support team respected all my requirements and the assignment was exactly to my directives. Thank you so much!

Calculate the Price

(approx ~ 0.0 page), total price $0, next articles.

• Finland And Nokia: Creating The World's Most Competitive Economy Swot Analysis
• China Telecom (Hong Kong) IPO: Money For Nothing? Swot Analysis
• ProjectSHED Swot Analysis
• FreeMove: Creating Value Through Strategic Alliances In The Mobile Telecommunications Industry Swot Analysis
• Google's Android: Will It Shake Up The Wireless Industry In 2009 And Beyond? Swot Analysis
• WebEx Communications (A): Navigating Through A Turbulent Market Swot Analysis
• Australia's Telstra Corp. (B): The Countdown Swot Analysis
• HTC Corp. In 2009, Spanish Version Swot Analysis
• Launching Telmore (A) Swot Analysis
• Symbian, Google & Apple In The Mobile Space (B) Swot Analysis

Previous Articles

• Transforming Verizon 2015: Going Above The Network Swot Analysis
• BCPC Internet Strategy Team: An Exercise Swot Analysis
• Accounting Fraud At WorldCom Swot Analysis
• The Rise And Fall Of Nokia Swot Analysis
• Steve Perlman And WebTV (A) Swot Analysis
• Cadence Vs. Avant! (A) Swot Analysis
• Inside Intel (A): Integrating DEC Semiconductors Swot Analysis
• Steve Perlman And WebTV (B) Swot Analysis
• Oracle's Hostile Takeover Of PeopleSoft (A) Swot Analysis
• Accrue Software, Inc. Swot Analysis

Be a great writer or hire a greater one!

Academic writing has no room for errors and mistakes. If you have BIG dreams to score BIG, think out of the box and hire Case48 with BIG enough reputation.

Our Guarantees

Zero plagiarism, best quality, qualified writers, absolute privacy, timely delivery.

Interesting Fact

Most recent surveys suggest that around 76 % students try professional academic writing services at least once in their lifetime!

Allow Our Skilled Essay Writers to Proficiently Finish Your Paper.

We are here to help. Chat with us on WhatsApp for any queries.

Customer Representative