Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
(PDF) Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival
The right example of Generalization Of Research Findings
10 Easy Steps: How to Write Findings in Research
What is Generalization?
Concepts of generalizability and transportability of data from
VIDEO
ONLINE Studio Visit: Verity-Jane Keefe
The Limits of Interaction Research
Best Practices for Causal (Cause & Effect) Inference and Validity in Experimental Research Design
PSYC 370 Introduction to personality theory. Lecture 2
Non-response Bias (A selection bias type) in Research #research #bias #sampling #selection #shorts
A lot of business people don't understand data and science #business #data #science
COMMENTS
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
For the subset of. reproducible findings, the cross-temporal generalizability rate was 84% (16 of 19) and the. cross-national generalizability rate was 57% (4 of 7); in contrast, for findings we ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Abstract and Figures. This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 ...
Examining the Generalizability of Research Findings From Archival Data
Examining the Generalizability of Research Findings From Archival Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America (PNAS) , 119 (30) This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. The authors repeated the key analyses for 29 ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. / Delios, Andrew ; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Wu, Tao et al. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 119, No. 30, e2120377119, 07.2022. Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Significance The extent to which results from complex datasets generalize across contexts is critically important to numerous scientific fields as well as to practitioners who rely on such analyses to guide important strategic decisions.
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Mentioning: 6 - This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. The extent to which results from complex datasets generalize across contexts is critically important to numerous scientific fields as well as to practitioners who rely on such analyses to guide important strategic decisions. Our initiative systematically investigated ...
PDF Examining the generalizability of research ndings from archival data
of data (e.g., separate time period, different country) as a direct replication or generalizability test depending on the implications of the results for the original !nding. Different aspects of research reliability can be examined in tandem: for example, sampling new data and carrying out many defensible analytic approaches at the same time.
PDF Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data Andrew Delios , Elena Giulia Clemente b,h Anna Dreber Magnus Johannesson , Hongbin Tand , Yong Wange , Michael Gordonf, Domenico Viganolag, Zhaowei Chena Tao Wu , Thomas Pfeifferf(), Generalizability Tests Forecasting Collaboration3, and Eric Luis Uhlmann
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. / Delios, Andrew; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Wu, Tao et al. In: PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), Vol. 119, No. 30, e2120377119, 26.07.2022.
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Some original findings were associated with multiple new tests. Reproducibility was the best predictor of generalizability-for the findings that proved directly reproducible, 84% emerged in other available time periods and 57% emerged in other geographies. Overall, only limited empirical evidence emerged for context sensitivity.
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Abstract. This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
Metadata. <jats:p>This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as ... Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Examining the ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
The present initiative examined systematically, for the first time, the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as 52 novel time periods and geographies. 44.83% of the reproductions returned results matching the original ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original…
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of ...
For the subset of. reproducible findings, the cross-temporal generalizability rate was 84% (16 of 19) and the. cross-national generalizability rate was 57% (4 of 7); in contrast, for findings we ...
Abstract and Figures. This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 ...
Examining the Generalizability of Research Findings From Archival Data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America (PNAS) , 119 (30) This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. The authors repeated the key analyses for 29 ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. / Delios, Andrew ; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Wu, Tao et al. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 119, No. 30, e2120377119, 07.2022. Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Significance The extent to which results from complex datasets generalize across contexts is critically important to numerous scientific fields as well as to practitioners who rely on such analyses to guide important strategic decisions.
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of ...
Mentioning: 6 - This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together ...
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. The extent to which results from complex datasets generalize across contexts is critically important to numerous scientific fields as well as to practitioners who rely on such analyses to guide important strategic decisions. Our initiative systematically investigated ...
of data (e.g., separate time period, different country) as a direct replication or generalizability test depending on the implications of the results for the original !nding. Different aspects of research reliability can be examined in tandem: for example, sampling new data and carrying out many defensible analytic approaches at the same time.
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data Andrew Delios , Elena Giulia Clemente b,h Anna Dreber Magnus Johannesson , Hongbin Tand , Yong Wange , Michael Gordonf, Domenico Viganolag, Zhaowei Chena Tao Wu , Thomas Pfeifferf(), Generalizability Tests Forecasting Collaboration3, and Eric Luis Uhlmann
Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. / Delios, Andrew; Clemente, Elena Giulia; Wu, Tao et al. In: PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), Vol. 119, No. 30, e2120377119, 26.07.2022.
Some original findings were associated with multiple new tests. Reproducibility was the best predictor of generalizability-for the findings that proved directly reproducible, 84% emerged in other available time periods and 57% emerged in other geographies. Overall, only limited empirical evidence emerged for context sensitivity.
Abstract. This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned ...
Metadata. <jats:p>This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions ...
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as ... Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data. Examining the ...
The present initiative examined systematically, for the first time, the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as 52 novel time periods and geographies. 44.83% of the reproductions returned results matching the original ...
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results ...
This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original…