thesis about data collection

Reference management. Clean and simple.

How to collect data for your thesis

Collecting theoretical data

Search for theses on your topic, use content-sharing platforms, collecting empirical data, qualitative vs. quantitative data, frequently asked questions about gathering data for your thesis, related articles.

After choosing a topic for your thesis , you’ll need to start gathering data. In this article, we focus on how to effectively collect theoretical and empirical data.

Empirical data : unique research that may be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed.

Theoretical data : secondary, scholarly sources like books and journal articles that provide theoretical context for your research.

Thesis : the culminating, multi-chapter project for a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral degree.

Qualitative data : info that cannot be measured, like observations and interviews .

Quantitative data : info that can be measured and written with numbers.

At this point in your academic life, you are already acquainted with the ways of finding potential references. Some obvious sources of theoretical material are:

• edited volumes
• conference proceedings
• online databases like Google Scholar , ERIC , or Scopus

You can also take a look at the top list of academic search engines .

Looking at other theses on your topic can help you see what approaches have been taken and what aspects other writers have focused on. Pay close attention to the list of references and follow the bread-crumbs back to the original theories and specialized authors.

Another method for gathering theoretical data is to read through content-sharing platforms. Many people share their papers and writings on these sites. You can either hunt sources, get some inspiration for your own work or even learn new angles of your topic. 

Some popular content sharing sites are:

With these sites, you have to check the credibility of the sources. You can usually rely on the content, but we recommend double-checking just to be sure. Take a look at our guide on what are credible sources?

The more you know, the better. The guide, " How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects ," will give you all the tools needed for finding literature .

In order to successfully collect empirical data, you have to choose first what type of data you want as an outcome. There are essentially two options, qualitative or quantitative data. Many people mistake one term with the other, so it’s important to understand the differences between qualitative and quantitative research .

Boiled down, qualitative data means words and quantitative means numbers. Both types are considered primary sources . Whichever one adapts best to your research will define the type of methodology to carry out, so choose wisely.

In the end, having in mind what type of outcome you intend and how much time you count on will lead you to choose the best type of empirical data for your research. For a detailed description of each methodology type mentioned above, read more about collecting data .

Once you gather enough theoretical and empirical data, you will need to start writing. But before the actual writing part, you have to structure your thesis to avoid getting lost in the sea of information. Take a look at our guide on how to structure your thesis for some tips and tricks.

The key to knowing what type of data you should collect for your thesis is knowing in advance the type of outcome you intend to have, and the amount of time you count with.

Some obvious sources of theoretical material are journals, libraries and online databases like Google Scholar , ERIC or Scopus , or take a look at the top list of academic search engines . You can also search for theses on your topic or read content sharing platforms, like Medium , Issuu , or Slideshare .

To gather empirical data, you have to choose first what type of data you want. There are two options, qualitative or quantitative data. You can gather data through observations, interviews, focus groups, or with surveys, tests, and existing databases.

Qualitative data means words, information that cannot be measured. It may involve multimedia material or non-textual data. This type of data claims to be detailed, nuanced and contextual.

Quantitative data means numbers, information that can be measured and written with numbers. This type of data claims to be credible, scientific and exact.

• How it works

Methods of Data Collection – Guide with Tips

Published by Carmen Troy at August 14th, 2021 , Revised On October 26, 2023

A key aspect of the  dissertation writing process  is to choose a method of data collection that would be recognised as independent and reliable in your field of study.

A well-rounded data collection method helps you communicate to the readers exactly how you would go about testing the research  hypothesis  or addressing the  research questions  – usually set out in the  dissertation introduction chapter .

So what are the different methods of data collection you can use in your dissertation?

When choosing a dissertation method of data collection, there are certain elements you would need to keep in mind including the chosen topic, the established research aim and objectives, formulated  research questions , and time and monetary limitations.

With several data collection methods to choose from, students often get confused about the most appropriate for their own research.

Here is a complete guide on the two research designs you can choose from in your dissertation –  primary research and secondary research . The different research approaches within each of these two categories are explained below in detail.

Primary Research Strategy

Primary research involves data collection directly from participants. This data collection method is often chosen when the research is based on a certain area, a specific organisation, or a country.

Because the dissertation requires specific  results  and information, the primary research strategy is chosen to gather the required information and formulate results according to the research questions. There are various methods for conducting primary research:

Interviews are face-to-face discussions conducted directly with the participant(s). The matters raised during interviews are audio/video recorded or manually written down for subsequent analysis.

Participants are asked to fill out and sign a consent form before conducting the interviews. All questions asked during the interview are related to the research only.

Participants have the complete right to remain anonymous or reveal personal details if appropriate. Interviews are one of the most commonly used data collection strategies for dissertations employed by researchers.

Interviews are a flexible type of research. There are three types of interviews, depending on the extent to which they are structured – structured interviews , semi-structured interviews , and informal/unstructured interviews .

• The researcher collects responses based on a set of established questions with little to no room for deviation from the pre-determined structure with structured interviews.
• Unstructured interviews do not require the researcher to have a set of pre-agreed questions for the interview. The scope of this type of interview includes comprehensive areas of discussion. Responses are gathered by employing techniques such as probing and prompting.
• Semi-structured interviews offer a balance between a formal interview’s focus and the flexibility of an unstructured interview.
• In either case, the participant is informed beforehand of the nature of the interview they will be involved in.
• While there is no strict rule concerning the number of participants an interview can involve, it would make sense to keep the group to 5-6 people. On the other hand, you can interview only one subject if that is more appropriate to your needs.

With the advent of technology, and to save time, many researchers now conduct online interviews and/or telephonic interviews. The timings and schedule are set before the day of the interview, and the participant is informed of the details via email. This helps in saving valuable time for the researcher, as well as the participant.

Not sure whether you should use primary or secondary research for your dissertation? Here is an article that provides all the information you need to  decide whether you should choose primary or secondary research .

Surveys  are another popular primary data collection method. The participants for this type of  research design  are chosen through a sampling method based on a selected population.

The researcher prepares a survey that consists of questions relating to  the topic of research . These  survey questions can be either open or close-ended .

Close-ended questions require the participant to choose from the multiple choices provided. If you are conducting a survey, you may decide not to meet the respondents due to financial or time constraints because surveys can be filled online or over a telephonic session.

On the other hand, open-ended questions do not have any options, and the respondent has the liberty to answer according to their own perception and understanding. For these types of surveys, meeting the participant in person would be the more fitting option.

Dissertations with close-ended questions are classified as quantitative research strategy dissertations. The data collected from these surveys are  analysed through statistical tools  such as SPSS or Excel.

Diverse tests are applied to the data depending on the research questions, aim, and objectives to reach a conclusion. For open-ended questions, qualitative analysis  is conducted by thematic analysis and coding techniques.

• Surveys are frequently conducted in market research, social sciences, and commercial settings.
• Surveys can also be useful across a wide range of disciplines from business to anthropology.

Our writers have years of experience in dissertation research. Whether you need help with the full dissertation paper or just a part of it, ResearchProspect writers can help you achieve your desired grade.

Does your Research Methodology Have the Following?

• Great Research/Sources
• Perfect Language
• Accurate Sources

If not, we can help. Our panel of experts makes sure to keep the 3 pillars of Research Methodology strong, and that too with zero plagiarism.

Questionnaires

Questionnaires are similar to closed-ended surveys. They contain standard questions and are distributed amongst a set of participants. A lot of researchers follow the Likert scale when using questionnaires.

This scale includes 5 options ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”. The questionnaire consists of statements to which the respondents have to respond based on the specified options.

These responses are then  analysed with the help of SPSS or another analytical tool  by running analytical tests to create trend graphs and charts according to each statement’s responses.

Observation

This type of dissertation research design is usually used when the behaviour of a group of people or an individual is to be studied. The researcher observes the participants figure out how they behave in certain conditions.

There are two types of observations – overt and covert. Overt observation is usually adopted when observing individuals. Participants are aware that they are being observed, and they also sign a written consent form.

On the other hand, covert observation refers to observation without consent. The participant is not aware that researchers are studying them, and no formal consent forms are required to be signed.

Focus Groups

This dissertation data collection method involves collecting data from a small group of people, usually limited to 8-10. The whole idea of focus groups is to bring together experts on the topic that is being investigated.

The researcher must play the role of a moderator to stimulate discussion between the focus group members. However, a focus group data collection strategy is viral among businesses and organisations who want to learn more about a certain niche market to identify a new group of potential consumers.

What data collection best suits your research?

• Find out by hiring an expert from ResearchProspect today!
• Despite how challenging the subject may be, we are here to help you.

Secondary Research Strategy

Secondary research is the other research approach for dissertations, and it is usually chosen for its cost-effectiveness. Secondary research refers to the study and analysis of already published material on the subject.

This means that when a research topic is finalised, the  research question  is formulated and aims and objectives set up; the researcher starts to look for research and studies conducted in the past on the same topic. Reviewing and analysing those studies helps understand the topic more effectively and relate previous results and conclusions.

Researchers carried out secondary research when there was limited or no access to the participants relating to the thesis problem , even though there could be other reasons to choose a secondary data collection strategy, such as time constraints and the high cost of conducting primary research.

When using previous research, you should always be aware that it might have been carried out in a different setting with different aims and objectives. Thus, they cannot exactly match the outcome  of your dissertation.

Basing your  findings  solely on one study will undermine the reliability of your work. Do your research, understand  your topic  and look for other researchers’ views in your field of study. This will give you an idea as to how the topic has been studied in the past.

Reviewing and analysing different perspectives on the same topic will help you improve your understanding, and you’ll be able to think critically about everything you read.

A thorough critical analysis will help you present the previous research and studies to add weight to your research work.

Results and  discussion  of secondary research are based on the findings mentioned in the previous studies and what you learned while reviewing and analysing them. There is absolutely nothing wrong if your findings are different from others who investigated the same topic.

The sources for this type of research include existing literature and research material (usually extracted from government bodies, libraries, books, journals, or credible websites).

If you are still unsure about the different research strategies you can use in your dissertation, you might want to get some help from our writers who will offer free advice regarding which method of research you should base your dissertation on.

Would you like some help with your dissertation methodology? We have academic experts for all academic subjects, who can assist you no matter how urgent or complex your needs may be.

Research prospect can help you with irrespective of the dissertation’s length; it can be partial or full. Please  fill out our simple order form  to place your order for the dissertation chapter –  methodology . Or find out more about our  dissertation writing services .

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the different methods of data collection.

Different methods of data collection include:

• Surveys/questionnaires: Gather standardized responses.
• Interviews: Obtain in-depth qualitative insights.
• Observations: Study behaviour in natural settings.
• Experiments: Manipulate variables to analyze outcomes.
• Secondary sources: Utilize existing data or documents.
• Case studies: Investigate a single subject deeply.

What is data collection?

Data collection is the systematic process of gathering and measuring information on variables of interest in an established systematic fashion, enabling one to answer relevant questions and evaluate outcomes. This process can be conducted through various methods such as surveys, observations, experiments, and digital analytics.

What methods of data collection are there?

Data collection methods include surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, case studies, focus groups, and document reviews. Additionally, digital methods encompass web analytics, social media monitoring, and data mining. The appropriate method depends on the research question, population studied, available resources, and desired data quality.

Which example illustrates the idea of collecting data?

A researcher distributes online questionnaires to study the impact of remote work on employee productivity. Respondents rate their efficiency, work-life balance, and job satisfaction. The collected data is then analysed to determine correlations and trends, providing insights into the effectiveness and challenges of remote work environments. This illustrates data collection.

What is qualitative data?

Qualitative data is non-numerical information that describes attributes, characteristics, or properties of an object or phenomenon. It provides insights into patterns, concepts, emotions, and contexts. Examples include interview transcripts, observational notes, and open-ended survey responses. This data type emphasises understanding depth, meaning, and complexity rather than quantification.

How to collect data?

• Define the research question or objective.
• Determine the data type (qualitative or quantitative).
• Select an appropriate collection method (surveys, interviews, observations, experiments).
• Design tools (e.g., questionnaires).
• Conduct the data-gathering process.
• Store and organise data securely.
• Review and clean data for accuracy.

You May Also Like

Experimental research refers to the experiments conducted in the laboratory or under observation in controlled conditions. Here is all you need to know about experimental research.

Baffled by the concept of reliability and validity? Reliability refers to the consistency of measurement. Validity refers to the accuracy of measurement.

You can transcribe an interview by converting a conversation into a written format including question-answer recording sessions between two or more people.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

Unlocking the Secrets of Effective PhD Data Collection: Strategies, Methods, and Best Practices

When embarking on the exciting journey of pursuing a PhD, one of the critical aspects that researchers must master is the art of data collection. The success of any thesis hinges upon the accuracy, relevance, and reliability of the collected data, making it essential to unlock the secrets of effective PhD data collection. In this comprehensive blog, we will explore a range of strategies, methods, and best practices to ensure that your thesis data collection process is conducted meticulously and yields valuable insights. By harnessing these invaluable insights, you will be equipped to make informed decisions, draw meaningful conclusions, and contribute significantly to your field of study. So, let's dive into the world of thesis data collection, uncovering the strategies and methodologies that will elevate the quality and impact of your research.

Types of Research Data

In the realm of research, data serves as the foundation upon which discoveries are built and theories are tested. Understanding the various types of research data is crucial for designing appropriate data collection methods and effectively analyzing the information gathered. Here are some common types of research data:

Quantitative Data : This type of data is expressed in numerical form and can be measured objectively. It involves collecting information through methods such as surveys, experiments, or structured observations. Examples of quantitative data include measurements, counts, ratings, and statistical data.

Qualitative Data : Unlike quantitative data, qualitative data is descriptive and focuses on capturing the richness and depth of experiences, opinions, and behaviours. It is collected through methods such as interviews, focus groups, observations, or analysis of textual or visual materials. Qualitative data provides insights into attitudes, motivations, perceptions, and social constructs.

Primary Data : Primary data is original data collected firsthand by researchers specifically for their research objectives. It involves gathering data directly from participants or sources through surveys, interviews, experiments, or observations. Primary data is tailored to the specific research questions and provides unique insights into the research problem.

Secondary Data : Secondary data refers to existing data that has been collected by someone else for a different purpose but can be used for research purposes. This data can be obtained from various sources such as government agencies, research organizations, published literature, or online databases. Examples of secondary data include census data, academic journals, reports, or archival records.

It is important to select the appropriate data type for your research objectives and design your data collection methods accordingly. Integrating multiple types of data can provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem and enhancing the validity and reliability of your findings.

Range of strategies

To ensure that your thesis data collection process is conducted meticulously and yields valuable insights, here are some strategies to consider:

Clearly Define Research Objectives : Begin by clearly defining your research objectives and questions. This will guide your data collection efforts and ensure that the collected data aligns with your research goals. Clearly defined objectives help focus your data collection process and maintain consistency throughout.

Choose Appropriate Data Collection Methods : Select data collection methods that align with your research objectives and the type of data you intend to collect. Common methods include surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, or analysis of existing data sources. Consider the strengths and limitations of each method and choose the most suitable ones for your research.

Develop a Detailed Data Collection Plan : Create a comprehensive plan that outlines the step-by-step process of data collection. This plan should include details such as the target population, sample size determination, data collection tools, timeline, and any necessary ethical considerations. A well-defined plan ensures systematic and organized data collection.

By implementing these strategies, you can conduct your thesis data collection process meticulously, ensuring that the data collected is robust, and reliable, and provides valuable insights for your research.

Range of methods 

To ensure that your thesis data collection process is conducted meticulously and yields valuable insights, consider implementing the following methods:

Sampling Techniques : Carefully choose appropriate sampling techniques to ensure that your sample represents the target population. Random sampling, stratified sampling, or purposive sampling can be employed based on the nature of your research and the availability of participants. Proper sampling methods help minimize bias and increase the generalizability of your findings.

Structured Data Collection Instruments : Design and utilize well-structured data collection instruments such as surveys, questionnaires, or interview guides. Ensure that the instruments are clear, concise, and relevant to your research objectives. Use standardized scales and response options to facilitate data analysis and comparison. Pilot testing and obtaining feedback from experts can enhance the quality of your instruments.

Data Triangulation : Employ data triangulation by utilizing multiple data collection methods or sources. This involves gathering data from different perspectives or using different methods to validate findings. For example, combining survey responses with interviews or incorporating existing data sources can provide a more comprehensive and robust understanding of the research topic.

By utilizing these methods, you can conduct your thesis data collection process meticulously, maximizing the value of the insights gained and strengthening the validity and reliability of your research findings.

Range of best practices

To ensure that your thesis data collection process is conducted meticulously and yields valuable insights, it is important to follow these best practices:

Thoroughly Plan and Prepare : Start by developing a detailed data collection plan. Clearly define your research objectives, research questions, and variables of interest. Determine the appropriate data collection methods, sampling techniques, and data analysis approaches. Adequate planning and preparation set the foundation for a successful data collection process.

Obtain Ethical Approval : If required, obtain ethical approval from your institution's research ethics board. Adhere to ethical guidelines and ensure that your data collection process respects the rights, privacy, and confidentiality of participants. Obtain informed consent and provide necessary information about the research objectives and participant rights.

Pilot Test and Refine : Conduct a pilot test of your data collection instruments or methods before implementing them on a larger scale. This helps identify any potential issues, ambiguities, or flaws in the instruments. Based on the pilot test feedback, refine and improve your data collection tools to enhance their effectiveness and clarity.

By adhering to these best practices, you can ensure that your thesis data collection process is meticulous, reliable, and yields valuable insights, contributing to the credibility and significance of your research.

Practical applications

Some practical applications of effective PhD data collection include:

Research studies : Effective data collection methods enable PhD researchers to gather relevant and accurate data for their research studies. This data can be used to analyze trends, test hypotheses, and draw meaningful conclusions.

Surveys and questionnaires : Collecting data through surveys and questionnaires allows researchers to gather information from a large number of participants. This data can be used to understand opinions, attitudes, and behaviors, providing valuable insights for research purposes.

Fieldwork and observations : For PhD research that involves fieldwork or observations, effective data collection is crucial. It allows researchers to systematically gather data in real-world settings, providing valuable context and rich information for their studies.

Experimental research : In experimental research, effective data collection ensures that all relevant variables are measured accurately. This enables researchers to evaluate the impact of interventions or treatments and draw valid conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships.

Longitudinal studies : Longitudinal studies require collecting data over an extended period. Effective data collection methods allow researchers to gather data at different time points, enabling the examination of changes, trends, and developments over time.

Qualitative research : Effective data collection is vital for qualitative research methods such as interviews, focus groups, or case studies. It ensures that researchers capture in-depth insights, experiences, and perspectives of participants, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

Literature reviews : Data collection in the form of literature reviews involves gathering relevant published studies, articles, and other sources of information. Effective data collection methods help researchers identify and select appropriate sources, ensuring a comprehensive and reliable review.

Hence, effective data collection methods are essential across various research domains and can contribute to producing robust, reliable, and meaningful findings during the course of a PhD program.

In conclusion, unlocking the secrets of effective PhD data collection is a critical endeavor that requires careful planning, strategic implementation, and adherence to best practices. The process of data collection is the backbone of any research, and by employing appropriate strategies, methods, and best practices, researchers can maximize the quality and value of their findings. The meticulous execution of data collection ensures that the collected data is robust, reliable, and capable of providing valuable insights into the research questions at hand. By integrating thorough planning, ethical considerations, rigorous training, and continuous monitoring, researchers can overcome challenges and optimize the data collection process. Maintaining data integrity, quality assurance, and transparency further strengthens the credibility and significance of the research outcomes. Ultimately, effective data collection serves as the foundation for rigorous analysis, meaningful interpretations, and advancements in knowledge within the realm of PhD research.

Get the quote

Please feel free to contact us if you have any enquiry, via telephone, email or by clicking on the contact us button below:-

Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Disaster Resilience and Sustainable Development pp 269–288 Cite as

Primary and Secondary Data Collection to Conduct Researches, Write Thesis and Dissertation Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Guidepost

• Antonio S. Valdez 13 ,
• Tabassam Raza 13 , 14 ,
• Martha I. Farolan 15 ,
• Celso I. Mendoza 16 , 18 ,
• Leticia Q. Perez 17 , 19 ,
• Jose F. Peralta 13 ,
• Richelle I. Valencia 13 &
• Harold Anthony Martin P. Lim 13  
• First Online: 13 October 2022

317 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 294))

Research has always been regarded by many as tedious because of the difficulties and challenges associated with doing research such as having to forego certain habits like social life. Doing research became even more difficult, especially with regard to limitation on collecting applicable primary and secondary data due to the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns. It is to be noted that substantive, thorough, sophisticated literature review and intensive pertinent primary data availability are ncessary for doing quality research relevant to the status quo. Various novel approaches have been adopted by scholars through their diverse academic spheres in conducting internationally acceptable research amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. This research aims to come up with a guidepost to facilitate researchers and other stakeholders with fundamental knowledge and skills in conducting substantive, thorough, sophisticated researches that are of international standards. A comparative and diagnostic analysis method is used for analyzing existing literature and policies developed by higher education institutions and schools for doing research in the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. The output allowed authors to develop a guidepost with rules on using limited primary and extensive secondary data in doing research. The guidepost consists of various sections explaining on how to do research and write theses and dissertations. These sections include among others research title, statement of the problem, research objectives, theoretical and conceptual frameworks, review of related literature, research methodology, analysis and interpretation of data, and conclusion and recommendations. The guidepost is very significant in doing researches and aids researchers in conducting internationally accepted researches with limited primary data and extensive secondary data in the advent of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The guidepost is flexible and can easily be used by local and international institutions’ researchers through little modification in context of their research fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

https://github.community/t/what-is-github/1197/2#M3417 .

Babbie E (1998) The practice of social research, Srh. Wadsworth, Belmont

Google Scholar  

Bernstein G, Walter A (2021) Research practice: perspectives from UX Researchers in a Changing Field. Greggcorp, LLC,: ISBN 0578811170, 9780578811178. https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/Research_Practice.html?id=I8QVzgEACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Boote DN, Beile P (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res 34(6): 3–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699805 . Accessed 2 Apr 2022

Caulfield J (2020) Writing a research paper introduction | step-by-step guide. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/research-paper/research-paper-introduction/#:~:text=The%20introduction%20to%20a%20research,Position%20your%20own%20approach

Creswell JW (2002) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research. Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE (2003) How to design and evaluate research in education, 5th cdn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston

Gay LR, Airasian PW (2000) Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. Merrill, Upper Saddle Rive

IATF-Inter-agency Task Force for the management of Emergency Infectious Disease (2020) Recommendations for the Management of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation, Inter-agency Task Force for the management of Emergency Infectious Disease, Resolution No. 3, Series of 2020, March 17, 2020. Manila. https://doh.gov.ph/sites/default/files/health-update/IATF-RESO-13.pdf

Intellspot (2022) Types of secondary data, What is secondary data? Definition and meaning? https://www.intellspot.com/secondary-data/

McMillan JH, Schumacher SA (2001) Research in education: a conceptual introduction, 5th edn. Longman, New York

Open Dialogue Foundation (ODF) (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on human rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/27533,the-impact-of-the-covid-19-crisis-on-human-rights-in-the-republic-of-kazakhstan/

Raza T, Rentoy F, Ahmed N, Andres A, Raza TK, Marasigan K, Espinosa R (2019) water challenges and urban sustainable development in changing climate: economic growth agenda for global South. Eur J Sustain Dev 8(4):421–436. https://ecsdev.org/ojs/index.php/ejsd/article/view/907/902

Samue F (2020) Tips for collecting primary data in a COVID-19 era. https://odi.org/en/publications/tips-for-collecting-primary-data-in-a-covid-19-era/

Schutt RK (2006) Investigating the Social world: the process and practice of research, 5th edn. ISBN-13: 978-1412927345, ISBN-10: 141292734X. https://www.amazon.com/Investigating-Social-World-Practice-Research/dp/141292734X

Martins FS, da Cunha JAC, Serra F (2018) Secondary data in research – uses and opportunities. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia 17:01–04. https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v17i4.2723

TA&MIU - Texas A&M International University (2020) Thesis and Dissertation Formatting Manual. Laredo, Texas 78041–1900: Graduate School. https://www.tamiu.edu/cees/arc/documents/thesis.dissertation.formatting.manual.pdf

UNHCR (2020) Data collection in times of physical distancing. https://www.unhcr.org/blogs/data-collection-in-times-of-physical-distancing/

University of Surrey (2016) How does research impact your everyday life? London: Study International, University of Surrey. https://www.studyinternational.com/news/how-does-research-impact-your-everyday-life/#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20without%20meteorology%2C%20we,the%20destruction%20of%20volcanic%20eruptions

Welsch W (2020) The new normal: collecting data amidst a global pandemic. https://www.jips.org/news/the-new-normal-collecting-data-amidst-a-global-pandemic-covid19/

WHO-World Health Organization (2020) COVID 19 transmission estimates by territory, philippines. world health organization

Zarah L (2022) 7 Reasons Why Resaerch is Important. The Arena Media Brands, LLC. https://owlcation.com/academia/Why-Research-is-Important-Within-and-Beyond-the-Academe

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Graduate School of Business and Director Disaster Risk Management Unit, Philippine School of Business Administration, Manila, Philippines

Antonio S. Valdez, Tabassam Raza, Jose F. Peralta, Richelle I. Valencia & Harold Anthony Martin P. Lim

School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of the Philippine, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

Tabassam Raza

Malabon City University, Malabon, Philippines

Martha I. Farolan

San Benildo College, Antipolo, Philippines

Celso I. Mendoza

Marikina Polytechnic College, Marikina, Philippines

Leticia Q. Perez

Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation, and Management (DPMM), Asian Institute of Technology, Khlong Nueng, Thailand

City and Regional Planning Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tabassam Raza .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation and Management (DPMM), Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Indrajit Pal

Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Surathkal, Karnataka, India

Sreevalsa Kolathayar

Institute of Remote Sensing and GIS, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Sheikh Tawhidul Islam

Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation and Management (DPMM), Asian Institute of Technology, Khlong Nueng, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Anirban Mukhopadhyay

School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

Iftekhar Ahmed

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Valdez, A.S. et al. (2023). Primary and Secondary Data Collection to Conduct Researches, Write Thesis and Dissertation Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: A Guidepost. In: Pal, I., Kolathayar, S., Tawhidul Islam, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Ahmed, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Disaster Resilience and Sustainable Development. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 294. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6297-4_20

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6297-4_20

Published : 13 October 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-19-6296-7

Online ISBN : 978-981-19-6297-4

eBook Packages : Engineering Engineering (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Log in / Register

• Getting started
• Criteria for a problem formulation
• Find who and what you are looking for
• Too broad, too narrow, or o.k.?
• Test your knowledge
• Lesson 5: Meeting your supervisor
• Getting started: summary
• Literature search
• Searching for articles
• Searching for Data
• Databases provided by your library
• Other useful search tools
• Free text, truncating and exact phrase
• Combining search terms – Boolean operators
• Keep track of your search strategies
• Problems finding your search terms?
• Different sources, different evaluations
• Extract by relevance
• Lesson 4: Obtaining literature
• Literature search: summary
• Research methods
• Combining qualitative and quantitative methods

Collecting data

• Analysing data
• Strengths and limitations
• Explanatory, analytical and experimental studies
• The Nature of Secondary Data
• How to Conduct a Systematic Review
• Directional Policy Research
• Strategic Policy Research
• Operational Policy Research
• Conducting Research Evaluation
• Research Methods: Summary
• Project management
• Project budgeting
• Data management plan
• Quality Control
• Project control
• Project management: Summary
• Writing process
• Title page, abstract, foreword, abbreviations, table of contents
• Introduction, methods, results
• Discussion, conclusions, recomendations, references, appendices, layout
• Use citations correctly
• Use references correctly
• Bibliographic software
• Writing process – summary
• Research methods /
• Lesson 1: Qualitative and quan… /

At the most basic level, data are considered quantitative if they are numbers and qualitative if they are words. Qualitative data may also include photos, videos, audio recordings and other non-text data. Those who favor quantitative data claim that their data are hard, rigorous, credible and scientific. Those in the qualitative camp counter that their data are sensitive, detailed, nuanced and contextual. Quantitative data best explain the what, who and when of a phenomenon while qualitative data best explain the why and how. Different techniques are used to collect quantitative and qualitative data:

Qualitative studies often utilise a mix of the above mentioned data collection approaches in order to make results more reliable. The use of multiple data collection approaches to improve reliability is known as data triangulation.

In general, researchers agree that qualitative and quantitative data and methods have different strengths, weaknesses, and requirements that affect decisions about which methodologies are appropriate for which purposes.

Now you know how to collect data, but how do you analyze it? Learn more about this in the following.

Your friend's e-mail

Message (Note: The link to the page is attached automtisk in the message to your friend)

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples

Published on 4 May 2022 by Pritha Bhandari .

Data collection is a systematic process of gathering observations or measurements. Whether you are performing research for business, governmental, or academic purposes, data collection allows you to gain first-hand knowledge and original insights into your research problem .

While methods and aims may differ between fields, the overall process of data collection remains largely the same. Before you begin collecting data, you need to consider:

• The  aim of the research
• The type of data that you will collect
• The methods and procedures you will use to collect, store, and process the data

To collect high-quality data that is relevant to your purposes, follow these four steps.

Table of contents

Step 1: define the aim of your research, step 2: choose your data collection method, step 3: plan your data collection procedures, step 4: collect the data, frequently asked questions about data collection.

Before you start the process of data collection, you need to identify exactly what you want to achieve. You can start by writing a problem statement : what is the practical or scientific issue that you want to address, and why does it matter?

Next, formulate one or more research questions that precisely define what you want to find out. Depending on your research questions, you might need to collect quantitative or qualitative data :

• Quantitative data is expressed in numbers and graphs and is analysed through statistical methods .
• Qualitative data is expressed in words and analysed through interpretations and categorisations.

If your aim is to test a hypothesis , measure something precisely, or gain large-scale statistical insights, collect quantitative data. If your aim is to explore ideas, understand experiences, or gain detailed insights into a specific context, collect qualitative data.

If you have several aims, you can use a mixed methods approach that collects both types of data.

• Your first aim is to assess whether there are significant differences in perceptions of managers across different departments and office locations.
• Your second aim is to gather meaningful feedback from employees to explore new ideas for how managers can improve.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Based on the data you want to collect, decide which method is best suited for your research.

• Experimental research is primarily a quantitative method.
• Interviews , focus groups , and ethnographies are qualitative methods.
• Surveys , observations, archival research, and secondary data collection can be quantitative or qualitative methods.

Carefully consider what method you will use to gather data that helps you directly answer your research questions.

When you know which method(s) you are using, you need to plan exactly how you will implement them. What procedures will you follow to make accurate observations or measurements of the variables you are interested in?

For instance, if you’re conducting surveys or interviews, decide what form the questions will take; if you’re conducting an experiment, make decisions about your experimental design .

Operationalisation

Sometimes your variables can be measured directly: for example, you can collect data on the average age of employees simply by asking for dates of birth. However, often you’ll be interested in collecting data on more abstract concepts or variables that can’t be directly observed.

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations. When planning how you will collect data, you need to translate the conceptual definition of what you want to study into the operational definition of what you will actually measure.

• You ask managers to rate their own leadership skills on 5-point scales assessing the ability to delegate, decisiveness, and dependability.
• You ask their direct employees to provide anonymous feedback on the managers regarding the same topics.

You may need to develop a sampling plan to obtain data systematically. This involves defining a population , the group you want to draw conclusions about, and a sample, the group you will actually collect data from.

Your sampling method will determine how you recruit participants or obtain measurements for your study. To decide on a sampling method you will need to consider factors like the required sample size, accessibility of the sample, and time frame of the data collection.

Standardising procedures

If multiple researchers are involved, write a detailed manual to standardise data collection procedures in your study.

This means laying out specific step-by-step instructions so that everyone in your research team collects data in a consistent way – for example, by conducting experiments under the same conditions and using objective criteria to record and categorise observations.

This helps ensure the reliability of your data, and you can also use it to replicate the study in the future.

Creating a data management plan

Before beginning data collection, you should also decide how you will organise and store your data.

• If you are collecting data from people, you will likely need to anonymise and safeguard the data to prevent leaks of sensitive information (e.g. names or identity numbers).
• If you are collecting data via interviews or pencil-and-paper formats, you will need to perform transcriptions or data entry in systematic ways to minimise distortion.
• You can prevent loss of data by having an organisation system that is routinely backed up.

Finally, you can implement your chosen methods to measure or observe the variables you are interested in.

The closed-ended questions ask participants to rate their manager’s leadership skills on scales from 1 to 5. The data produced is numerical and can be statistically analysed for averages and patterns.

To ensure that high-quality data is recorded in a systematic way, here are some best practices:

• Record all relevant information as and when you obtain data. For example, note down whether or how lab equipment is recalibrated during an experimental study.
• Double-check manual data entry for errors.
• If you collect quantitative data, you can assess the reliability and validity to get an indication of your data quality.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organisations.

When conducting research, collecting original data has significant advantages:

• You can tailor data collection to your specific research aims (e.g., understanding the needs of your consumers or user testing your website).
• You can control and standardise the process for high reliability and validity (e.g., choosing appropriate measurements and sampling methods ).

However, there are also some drawbacks: data collection can be time-consuming, labour-intensive, and expensive. In some cases, it’s more efficient to use secondary data that has already been collected by someone else, but the data might be less reliable.

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to test a hypothesis by systematically collecting and analysing data, while qualitative methods allow you to explore ideas and experiences in depth.

Reliability and validity are both about how well a method measures something:

• Reliability refers to the  consistency of a measure (whether the results can be reproduced under the same conditions).
• Validity   refers to the  accuracy of a measure (whether the results really do represent what they are supposed to measure).

If you are doing experimental research , you also have to consider the internal and external validity of your experiment.

In mixed methods research , you use both qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis methods to answer your research question .

Operationalisation means turning abstract conceptual ideas into measurable observations.

For example, the concept of social anxiety isn’t directly observable, but it can be operationally defined in terms of self-rating scores, behavioural avoidance of crowded places, or physical anxiety symptoms in social situations.

Before collecting data , it’s important to consider how you will operationalise the variables that you want to measure.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2022, May 04). Data Collection Methods | Step-by-Step Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 15 April 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/data-collection-guide/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs quantitative research | examples & methods, triangulation in research | guide, types, examples, what is a conceptual framework | tips & examples.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Can J Hosp Pharm
• v.68(3); May-Jun 2015

Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management

Introduction.

In an earlier paper, 1 we presented an introduction to using qualitative research methods in pharmacy practice. In this article, we review some principles of the collection, analysis, and management of qualitative data to help pharmacists interested in doing research in their practice to continue their learning in this area. Qualitative research can help researchers to access the thoughts and feelings of research participants, which can enable development of an understanding of the meaning that people ascribe to their experiences. Whereas quantitative research methods can be used to determine how many people undertake particular behaviours, qualitative methods can help researchers to understand how and why such behaviours take place. Within the context of pharmacy practice research, qualitative approaches have been used to examine a diverse array of topics, including the perceptions of key stakeholders regarding prescribing by pharmacists and the postgraduation employment experiences of young pharmacists (see “Further Reading” section at the end of this article).

In the previous paper, 1 we outlined 3 commonly used methodologies: ethnography 2 , grounded theory 3 , and phenomenology. 4 Briefly, ethnography involves researchers using direct observation to study participants in their “real life” environment, sometimes over extended periods. Grounded theory and its later modified versions (e.g., Strauss and Corbin 5 ) use face-to-face interviews and interactions such as focus groups to explore a particular research phenomenon and may help in clarifying a less-well-understood problem, situation, or context. Phenomenology shares some features with grounded theory (such as an exploration of participants’ behaviour) and uses similar techniques to collect data, but it focuses on understanding how human beings experience their world. It gives researchers the opportunity to put themselves in another person’s shoes and to understand the subjective experiences of participants. 6 Some researchers use qualitative methodologies but adopt a different standpoint, and an example of this appears in the work of Thurston and others, 7 discussed later in this paper.

Qualitative work requires reflection on the part of researchers, both before and during the research process, as a way of providing context and understanding for readers. When being reflexive, researchers should not try to simply ignore or avoid their own biases (as this would likely be impossible); instead, reflexivity requires researchers to reflect upon and clearly articulate their position and subjectivities (world view, perspectives, biases), so that readers can better understand the filters through which questions were asked, data were gathered and analyzed, and findings were reported. From this perspective, bias and subjectivity are not inherently negative but they are unavoidable; as a result, it is best that they be articulated up-front in a manner that is clear and coherent for readers.

THE PARTICIPANT’S VIEWPOINT

What qualitative study seeks to convey is why people have thoughts and feelings that might affect the way they behave. Such study may occur in any number of contexts, but here, we focus on pharmacy practice and the way people behave with regard to medicines use (e.g., to understand patients’ reasons for nonadherence with medication therapy or to explore physicians’ resistance to pharmacists’ clinical suggestions). As we suggested in our earlier article, 1 an important point about qualitative research is that there is no attempt to generalize the findings to a wider population. Qualitative research is used to gain insights into people’s feelings and thoughts, which may provide the basis for a future stand-alone qualitative study or may help researchers to map out survey instruments for use in a quantitative study. It is also possible to use different types of research in the same study, an approach known as “mixed methods” research, and further reading on this topic may be found at the end of this paper.

The role of the researcher in qualitative research is to attempt to access the thoughts and feelings of study participants. This is not an easy task, as it involves asking people to talk about things that may be very personal to them. Sometimes the experiences being explored are fresh in the participant’s mind, whereas on other occasions reliving past experiences may be difficult. However the data are being collected, a primary responsibility of the researcher is to safeguard participants and their data. Mechanisms for such safeguarding must be clearly articulated to participants and must be approved by a relevant research ethics review board before the research begins. Researchers and practitioners new to qualitative research should seek advice from an experienced qualitative researcher before embarking on their project.

DATA COLLECTION

Whatever philosophical standpoint the researcher is taking and whatever the data collection method (e.g., focus group, one-to-one interviews), the process will involve the generation of large amounts of data. In addition to the variety of study methodologies available, there are also different ways of making a record of what is said and done during an interview or focus group, such as taking handwritten notes or video-recording. If the researcher is audio- or video-recording data collection, then the recordings must be transcribed verbatim before data analysis can begin. As a rough guide, it can take an experienced researcher/transcriber 8 hours to transcribe one 45-minute audio-recorded interview, a process than will generate 20–30 pages of written dialogue.

Many researchers will also maintain a folder of “field notes” to complement audio-taped interviews. Field notes allow the researcher to maintain and comment upon impressions, environmental contexts, behaviours, and nonverbal cues that may not be adequately captured through the audio-recording; they are typically handwritten in a small notebook at the same time the interview takes place. Field notes can provide important context to the interpretation of audio-taped data and can help remind the researcher of situational factors that may be important during data analysis. Such notes need not be formal, but they should be maintained and secured in a similar manner to audio tapes and transcripts, as they contain sensitive information and are relevant to the research. For more information about collecting qualitative data, please see the “Further Reading” section at the end of this paper.

DATA ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT

If, as suggested earlier, doing qualitative research is about putting oneself in another person’s shoes and seeing the world from that person’s perspective, the most important part of data analysis and management is to be true to the participants. It is their voices that the researcher is trying to hear, so that they can be interpreted and reported on for others to read and learn from. To illustrate this point, consider the anonymized transcript excerpt presented in Appendix 1 , which is taken from a research interview conducted by one of the authors (J.S.). We refer to this excerpt throughout the remainder of this paper to illustrate how data can be managed, analyzed, and presented.

Interpretation of Data

Interpretation of the data will depend on the theoretical standpoint taken by researchers. For example, the title of the research report by Thurston and others, 7 “Discordant indigenous and provider frames explain challenges in improving access to arthritis care: a qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory,” indicates at least 2 theoretical standpoints. The first is the culture of the indigenous population of Canada and the place of this population in society, and the second is the social constructivist theory used in the constructivist grounded theory method. With regard to the first standpoint, it can be surmised that, to have decided to conduct the research, the researchers must have felt that there was anecdotal evidence of differences in access to arthritis care for patients from indigenous and non-indigenous backgrounds. With regard to the second standpoint, it can be surmised that the researchers used social constructivist theory because it assumes that behaviour is socially constructed; in other words, people do things because of the expectations of those in their personal world or in the wider society in which they live. (Please see the “Further Reading” section for resources providing more information about social constructivist theory and reflexivity.) Thus, these 2 standpoints (and there may have been others relevant to the research of Thurston and others 7 ) will have affected the way in which these researchers interpreted the experiences of the indigenous population participants and those providing their care. Another standpoint is feminist standpoint theory which, among other things, focuses on marginalized groups in society. Such theories are helpful to researchers, as they enable us to think about things from a different perspective. Being aware of the standpoints you are taking in your own research is one of the foundations of qualitative work. Without such awareness, it is easy to slip into interpreting other people’s narratives from your own viewpoint, rather than that of the participants.

To analyze the example in Appendix 1 , we will adopt a phenomenological approach because we want to understand how the participant experienced the illness and we want to try to see the experience from that person’s perspective. It is important for the researcher to reflect upon and articulate his or her starting point for such analysis; for example, in the example, the coder could reflect upon her own experience as a female of a majority ethnocultural group who has lived within middle class and upper middle class settings. This personal history therefore forms the filter through which the data will be examined. This filter does not diminish the quality or significance of the analysis, since every researcher has his or her own filters; however, by explicitly stating and acknowledging what these filters are, the researcher makes it easer for readers to contextualize the work.

Transcribing and Checking

For the purposes of this paper it is assumed that interviews or focus groups have been audio-recorded. As mentioned above, transcribing is an arduous process, even for the most experienced transcribers, but it must be done to convert the spoken word to the written word to facilitate analysis. For anyone new to conducting qualitative research, it is beneficial to transcribe at least one interview and one focus group. It is only by doing this that researchers realize how difficult the task is, and this realization affects their expectations when asking others to transcribe. If the research project has sufficient funding, then a professional transcriber can be hired to do the work. If this is the case, then it is a good idea to sit down with the transcriber, if possible, and talk through the research and what the participants were talking about. This background knowledge for the transcriber is especially important in research in which people are using jargon or medical terms (as in pharmacy practice). Involving your transcriber in this way makes the work both easier and more rewarding, as he or she will feel part of the team. Transcription editing software is also available, but it is expensive. For example, ELAN (more formally known as EUDICO Linguistic Annotator, developed at the Technical University of Berlin) 8 is a tool that can help keep data organized by linking media and data files (particularly valuable if, for example, video-taping of interviews is complemented by transcriptions). It can also be helpful in searching complex data sets. Products such as ELAN do not actually automatically transcribe interviews or complete analyses, and they do require some time and effort to learn; nonetheless, for some research applications, it may be a valuable to consider such software tools.

All audio recordings should be transcribed verbatim, regardless of how intelligible the transcript may be when it is read back. Lines of text should be numbered. Once the transcription is complete, the researcher should read it while listening to the recording and do the following: correct any spelling or other errors; anonymize the transcript so that the participant cannot be identified from anything that is said (e.g., names, places, significant events); insert notations for pauses, laughter, looks of discomfort; insert any punctuation, such as commas and full stops (periods) (see Appendix 1 for examples of inserted punctuation), and include any other contextual information that might have affected the participant (e.g., temperature or comfort of the room).

Dealing with the transcription of a focus group is slightly more difficult, as multiple voices are involved. One way of transcribing such data is to “tag” each voice (e.g., Voice A, Voice B). In addition, the focus group will usually have 2 facilitators, whose respective roles will help in making sense of the data. While one facilitator guides participants through the topic, the other can make notes about context and group dynamics. More information about group dynamics and focus groups can be found in resources listed in the “Further Reading” section.

Reading between the Lines

During the process outlined above, the researcher can begin to get a feel for the participant’s experience of the phenomenon in question and can start to think about things that could be pursued in subsequent interviews or focus groups (if appropriate). In this way, one participant’s narrative informs the next, and the researcher can continue to interview until nothing new is being heard or, as it says in the text books, “saturation is reached”. While continuing with the processes of coding and theming (described in the next 2 sections), it is important to consider not just what the person is saying but also what they are not saying. For example, is a lengthy pause an indication that the participant is finding the subject difficult, or is the person simply deciding what to say? The aim of the whole process from data collection to presentation is to tell the participants’ stories using exemplars from their own narratives, thus grounding the research findings in the participants’ lived experiences.

Smith 9 suggested a qualitative research method known as interpretative phenomenological analysis, which has 2 basic tenets: first, that it is rooted in phenomenology, attempting to understand the meaning that individuals ascribe to their lived experiences, and second, that the researcher must attempt to interpret this meaning in the context of the research. That the researcher has some knowledge and expertise in the subject of the research means that he or she can have considerable scope in interpreting the participant’s experiences. Larkin and others 10 discussed the importance of not just providing a description of what participants say. Rather, interpretative phenomenological analysis is about getting underneath what a person is saying to try to truly understand the world from his or her perspective.

Once all of the research interviews have been transcribed and checked, it is time to begin coding. Field notes compiled during an interview can be a useful complementary source of information to facilitate this process, as the gap in time between an interview, transcribing, and coding can result in memory bias regarding nonverbal or environmental context issues that may affect interpretation of data.

Coding refers to the identification of topics, issues, similarities, and differences that are revealed through the participants’ narratives and interpreted by the researcher. This process enables the researcher to begin to understand the world from each participant’s perspective. Coding can be done by hand on a hard copy of the transcript, by making notes in the margin or by highlighting and naming sections of text. More commonly, researchers use qualitative research software (e.g., NVivo, QSR International Pty Ltd; www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx ) to help manage their transcriptions. It is advised that researchers undertake a formal course in the use of such software or seek supervision from a researcher experienced in these tools.

Returning to Appendix 1 and reading from lines 8–11, a code for this section might be “diagnosis of mental health condition”, but this would just be a description of what the participant is talking about at that point. If we read a little more deeply, we can ask ourselves how the participant might have come to feel that the doctor assumed he or she was aware of the diagnosis or indeed that they had only just been told the diagnosis. There are a number of pauses in the narrative that might suggest the participant is finding it difficult to recall that experience. Later in the text, the participant says “nobody asked me any questions about my life” (line 19). This could be coded simply as “health care professionals’ consultation skills”, but that would not reflect how the participant must have felt never to be asked anything about his or her personal life, about the participant as a human being. At the end of this excerpt, the participant just trails off, recalling that no-one showed any interest, which makes for very moving reading. For practitioners in pharmacy, it might also be pertinent to explore the participant’s experience of akathisia and why this was left untreated for 20 years.

One of the questions that arises about qualitative research relates to the reliability of the interpretation and representation of the participants’ narratives. There are no statistical tests that can be used to check reliability and validity as there are in quantitative research. However, work by Lincoln and Guba 11 suggests that there are other ways to “establish confidence in the ‘truth’ of the findings” (p. 218). They call this confidence “trustworthiness” and suggest that there are 4 criteria of trustworthiness: credibility (confidence in the “truth” of the findings), transferability (showing that the findings have applicability in other contexts), dependability (showing that the findings are consistent and could be repeated), and confirmability (the extent to which the findings of a study are shaped by the respondents and not researcher bias, motivation, or interest).

One way of establishing the “credibility” of the coding is to ask another researcher to code the same transcript and then to discuss any similarities and differences in the 2 resulting sets of codes. This simple act can result in revisions to the codes and can help to clarify and confirm the research findings.

Theming refers to the drawing together of codes from one or more transcripts to present the findings of qualitative research in a coherent and meaningful way. For example, there may be examples across participants’ narratives of the way in which they were treated in hospital, such as “not being listened to” or “lack of interest in personal experiences” (see Appendix 1 ). These may be drawn together as a theme running through the narratives that could be named “the patient’s experience of hospital care”. The importance of going through this process is that at its conclusion, it will be possible to present the data from the interviews using quotations from the individual transcripts to illustrate the source of the researchers’ interpretations. Thus, when the findings are organized for presentation, each theme can become the heading of a section in the report or presentation. Underneath each theme will be the codes, examples from the transcripts, and the researcher’s own interpretation of what the themes mean. Implications for real life (e.g., the treatment of people with chronic mental health problems) should also be given.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In this final section of this paper, we describe some ways of drawing together or “synthesizing” research findings to represent, as faithfully as possible, the meaning that participants ascribe to their life experiences. This synthesis is the aim of the final stage of qualitative research. For most readers, the synthesis of data presented by the researcher is of crucial significance—this is usually where “the story” of the participants can be distilled, summarized, and told in a manner that is both respectful to those participants and meaningful to readers. There are a number of ways in which researchers can synthesize and present their findings, but any conclusions drawn by the researchers must be supported by direct quotations from the participants. In this way, it is made clear to the reader that the themes under discussion have emerged from the participants’ interviews and not the mind of the researcher. The work of Latif and others 12 gives an example of how qualitative research findings might be presented.

Planning and Writing the Report

As has been suggested above, if researchers code and theme their material appropriately, they will naturally find the headings for sections of their report. Qualitative researchers tend to report “findings” rather than “results”, as the latter term typically implies that the data have come from a quantitative source. The final presentation of the research will usually be in the form of a report or a paper and so should follow accepted academic guidelines. In particular, the article should begin with an introduction, including a literature review and rationale for the research. There should be a section on the chosen methodology and a brief discussion about why qualitative methodology was most appropriate for the study question and why one particular methodology (e.g., interpretative phenomenological analysis rather than grounded theory) was selected to guide the research. The method itself should then be described, including ethics approval, choice of participants, mode of recruitment, and method of data collection (e.g., semistructured interviews or focus groups), followed by the research findings, which will be the main body of the report or paper. The findings should be written as if a story is being told; as such, it is not necessary to have a lengthy discussion section at the end. This is because much of the discussion will take place around the participants’ quotes, such that all that is needed to close the report or paper is a summary, limitations of the research, and the implications that the research has for practice. As stated earlier, it is not the intention of qualitative research to allow the findings to be generalized, and therefore this is not, in itself, a limitation.

Planning out the way that findings are to be presented is helpful. It is useful to insert the headings of the sections (the themes) and then make a note of the codes that exemplify the thoughts and feelings of your participants. It is generally advisable to put in the quotations that you want to use for each theme, using each quotation only once. After all this is done, the telling of the story can begin as you give your voice to the experiences of the participants, writing around their quotations. Do not be afraid to draw assumptions from the participants’ narratives, as this is necessary to give an in-depth account of the phenomena in question. Discuss these assumptions, drawing on your participants’ words to support you as you move from one code to another and from one theme to the next. Finally, as appropriate, it is possible to include examples from literature or policy documents that add support for your findings. As an exercise, you may wish to code and theme the sample excerpt in Appendix 1 and tell the participant’s story in your own way. Further reading about “doing” qualitative research can be found at the end of this paper.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative research can help researchers to access the thoughts and feelings of research participants, which can enable development of an understanding of the meaning that people ascribe to their experiences. It can be used in pharmacy practice research to explore how patients feel about their health and their treatment. Qualitative research has been used by pharmacists to explore a variety of questions and problems (see the “Further Reading” section for examples). An understanding of these issues can help pharmacists and other health care professionals to tailor health care to match the individual needs of patients and to develop a concordant relationship. Doing qualitative research is not easy and may require a complete rethink of how research is conducted, particularly for researchers who are more familiar with quantitative approaches. There are many ways of conducting qualitative research, and this paper has covered some of the practical issues regarding data collection, analysis, and management. Further reading around the subject will be essential to truly understand this method of accessing peoples’ thoughts and feelings to enable researchers to tell participants’ stories.

Appendix 1. Excerpt from a sample transcript

The participant (age late 50s) had suffered from a chronic mental health illness for 30 years. The participant had become a “revolving door patient,” someone who is frequently in and out of hospital. As the participant talked about past experiences, the researcher asked:

• What was treatment like 30 years ago?
• Umm—well it was pretty much they could do what they wanted with you because I was put into the er, the er kind of system er, I was just on
• endless section threes.
• Really…
• But what I didn’t realize until later was that if you haven’t actually posed a threat to someone or yourself they can’t really do that but I didn’t know
• that. So wh-when I first went into hospital they put me on the forensic ward ’cause they said, “We don’t think you’ll stay here we think you’ll just
• run-run away.” So they put me then onto the acute admissions ward and – er – I can remember one of the first things I recall when I got onto that
• ward was sitting down with a er a Dr XXX. He had a book this thick [gestures] and on each page it was like three questions and he went through
• all these questions and I answered all these questions. So we’re there for I don’t maybe two hours doing all that and he asked me he said “well
• when did somebody tell you then that you have schizophrenia” I said “well nobody’s told me that” so he seemed very surprised but nobody had
• actually [pause] whe-when I first went up there under police escort erm the senior kind of consultants people I’d been to where I was staying and
• ermm so er [pause] I . . . the, I can remember the very first night that I was there and given this injection in this muscle here [gestures] and just
• having dreadful side effects the next day I woke up [pause]
• . . . and I suffered that akathesia I swear to you, every minute of every day for about 20 years.
• Oh how awful.
• And that side of it just makes life impossible so the care on the wards [pause] umm I don’t know it’s kind of, it’s kind of hard to put into words
• [pause]. Because I’m not saying they were sort of like not friendly or interested but then nobody ever seemed to want to talk about your life [pause]
• nobody asked me any questions about my life. The only questions that came into was they asked me if I’d be a volunteer for these student exams
• and things and I said “yeah” so all the questions were like “oh what jobs have you done,” er about your relationships and things and er but
• nobody actually sat down and had a talk and showed some interest in you as a person you were just there basically [pause] um labelled and you
• know there was there was [pause] but umm [pause] yeah . . .

This article is the 10th in the CJHP Research Primer Series, an initiative of the CJHP Editorial Board and the CSHP Research Committee. The planned 2-year series is intended to appeal to relatively inexperienced researchers, with the goal of building research capacity among practising pharmacists. The articles, presenting simple but rigorous guidance to encourage and support novice researchers, are being solicited from authors with appropriate expertise.

Previous articles in this series:

Bond CM. The research jigsaw: how to get started. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(1):28–30.

Tully MP. Research: articulating questions, generating hypotheses, and choosing study designs. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(1):31–4.

Loewen P. Ethical issues in pharmacy practice research: an introductory guide. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67(2):133–7.

Tsuyuki RT. Designing pharmacy practice research trials. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(3):226–9.

Bresee LC. An introduction to developing surveys for pharmacy practice research. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(4):286–91.

Gamble JM. An introduction to the fundamentals of cohort and case–control studies. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(5):366–72.

Austin Z, Sutton J. Qualitative research: getting started. C an J Hosp Pharm . 2014;67(6):436–40.

Houle S. An introduction to the fundamentals of randomized controlled trials in pharmacy research. Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014; 68(1):28–32.

Charrois TL. Systematic reviews: What do you need to know to get started? Can J Hosp Pharm . 2014;68(2):144–8.

Competing interests: None declared.

Further Reading

Examples of qualitative research in pharmacy practice.

• Farrell B, Pottie K, Woodend K, Yao V, Dolovich L, Kennie N, et al. Shifts in expectations: evaluating physicians’ perceptions as pharmacists integrated into family practice. J Interprof Care. 2010; 24 (1):80–9. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gregory P, Austin Z. Postgraduation employment experiences of new pharmacists in Ontario in 2012–2013. Can Pharm J. 2014; 147 (5):290–9. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Marks PZ, Jennnings B, Farrell B, Kennie-Kaulbach N, Jorgenson D, Pearson-Sharpe J, et al. “I gained a skill and a change in attitude”: a case study describing how an online continuing professional education course for pharmacists supported achievement of its transfer to practice outcomes. Can J Univ Contin Educ. 2014; 40 (2):1–18. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nair KM, Dolovich L, Brazil K, Raina P. It’s all about relationships: a qualitative study of health researchers’ perspectives on interdisciplinary research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8 :110. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pojskic N, MacKeigan L, Boon H, Austin Z. Initial perceptions of key stakeholders in Ontario regarding independent prescriptive authority for pharmacists. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2014; 10 (2):341–54. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]

Qualitative Research in General

• Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Schaw C. Research methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995. [ Google Scholar ]
• Given LM. 100 questions (and answers) about qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
• Miles B, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 2001. [ Google Scholar ]

Group Dynamics in Focus Groups

• Farnsworth J, Boon B. Analysing group dynamics within the focus group. Qual Res. 2010; 10 (5):605–24. [ Google Scholar ]

Social Constructivism

• Social constructivism. Berkeley (CA): University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley Graduate Division, Graduate Student Instruction Teaching & Resource Center; [cited 2015 June 4]. Available from: http://gsi.berkeley.edu/gsi-guide-contents/learning-theory-research/social-constructivism/ [ Google Scholar ]

Mixed Methods

• Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2009. [ Google Scholar ]

Collecting Qualitative Data

• Arksey H, Knight P. Interviewing for social scientists: an introductory resource with examples. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchel ML. Collecting qualitative data: a field manual for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2013. [ Google Scholar ]

Constructivist Grounded Theory

• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2000. pp. 509–35. [ Google Scholar ]

Data Collection Methods

Regardless of the topic of your dissertation or thesis, it is highly likely that at some point you will need to collect data. Below are some common data collection methods. Remember, you will want to collect data in a way that fits your research design and questions.

Self-Report

Self-report is a type of research design in which participants give their responses to a given set of questions. The most common types of self-report are interviews or questionnaires. One major limitation of self-report versus other data collection methods is that accuracy of responses cannot be determined, and there are many circumstances in which participants are likely to lie.

Observation

Observation is a method of collecting data in which members of research teams observe and record behaviors. Data collected during observation are explicit and quantifiable. However, observation has many limitations. First, researchers who use observation can only observe behaviors; therefore, observation cannot be used to collect data about attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, covert behaviors, etc. Another limitation of observation is that it is a known fact that being observed changes behavior. Observation can be either formal (e.g., structured in a laboratory setting) or casual (e.g., in the natural environment), and the observer may either be a participant (e.g., member of the group being observed) or a nonparticipant (e.g., not a member of the group being observed).

Physiological Measures

Physiological measures can be used to collect data related to the body, such as heart rate, fMRI, EEG, CAT, breathing rate, etc. These types of data are useful because they are quantifiable and accurate. However, these types of data are sometimes used as secondary measures of latent constructs, which may not always be accurate. For example, someone with a high heart rate may be perceived as being anxious, but it is possible that that person just walked up a flight of stairs.

Interviews are one of the data collection methods for qualitative research. Interviews consist of meeting with participants one on one and asking them open-ended questions. Interviews can be structured or semi-structured. In a structured interview, the researcher has a predetermined set of questions to ask and does not deviate from those questions. In a semi-structured interview, the researcher will have prepared questions but has the freedom to ask additional follow up questions as he or she sees fit.

Focus Groups

Focus groups are another example of data collection methods of a qualitative study. Using focus groups to collect data is similar to using interviews because focus groups allow participants to freely answer questions; however, as implied by the name, focus groups consist of multiple people all being asked questions at the same time.

Click here to cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2024 PhDStudent.com. All rights reserved. Designed by Divergent Web Solutions, LLC .

7 Data collection methods and tools for research

by Bastis Consultores | Mar 9, 2021 | Methodology | 2 comments

The underlying need for data collection is to capture quality evidence that attempts to answer all the questions that have been raised. Through data collection, companies or managers can deduce quality information that is a prerequisite for making informed decisions.

To improve the quality of information, it is desirable that data be collected so that inferences can be made and informed decisions about what is considered a fact.

At the end of this article, you will understand why it is necessary to choose the best method of data collection to achieve the goal you have set yourself.

What is data collection?

Data collection is a methodical process of gathering and analyzing specific information to provide solutions to relevant questions and evaluate results. It focuses on finding out everything about a particular topic. The data are collected for a hypothesis test that seeks to explain a phenomenon.

Hypothesis checking eliminates assumptions while making a proposition from reason.

Data collectors have a series of results for which the data is collected. However, the main objective of data collection is to put the researcher in an advantageous position to make predictions about probabilities and future trends.

The primary ways in which data can be collected are primary and secondary data. While the former are collected by a researcher through first-hand sources, the latter are collected by a person other than the user.

Before addressing the issue of different types of data collection. It is pertinent to note that data collection itself is divided into two broad categories: the collection of primary data and the collection of secondary data.

Primary data collection

Primary data collection is, by definition, the collection of raw data collected at source. It is a process of collecting the original data collected by a researcher for a specific research purpose. It can be analyzed in two segments: qualitative research and quantitative data collection methods.

Qualitative research method

Qualitative research methods of data collection do not involve the collection of data that involve numbers or that must be deduced by mathematical calculation, but are based on non-quantifiable elements such as the feeling or emotion of the researcher. An example of this method is an open questionnaire.

Quantitative method

Quantitative methods are presented in numbers and require a mathematical calculation for their deduction. An example would be the use of a questionnaire with closed questions to arrive at figures that must be calculated mathematically. Also the methods of correlation and regression, the mean, the mode and the median.

Secondary data collection

Secondary data collection is the collection of second-hand data by a person who is not the original user. It is the process of collecting existing data, whether books, journals and/or already published online portals. In terms of ease, it’s much less expensive and easier to collect.

The choice between primary data collection and secondary data collection depends on the nature, scope and area of your research, as well as its purposes and objectives.

There are a lot of underlying reasons for data collection, especially for a researcher. Here are some reasons:

Integrity of research

A key reason for collecting data, whether by quantitative or qualitative methods, is to ensure that the integrity of the research question is maintained.

Reduce the likelihood of errors

The correct use of the appropriate data collection methods reduces the likelihood of errors consistent with the results.

Decision-making

To minimize the risk of decision-making errors, it is important that accurate data are collected so that the researcher does not make uninformed decisions.

Cost and time savings

Data collection saves the researcher time and funds that would otherwise be wasted without a deeper understanding of the topic or subject matter.

To support the need for a new idea, change and/or innovation

To demonstrate the need for a change in the standard or the introduction of new information that will be widely accepted, it is important to collect data as evidence to support these claims.

What is a data collection tool?

Data collection tools refer to the devices/instruments used to collect data, such as a paper questionnaire or a computer-aided interview system. Case studies, checklists, interviews, sometimes observation, and surveys or questionnaires are all tools used to collect data.

It is important to decide on data collection tools because research is carried out in different ways and for different purposes. The aim of data collection is to obtain quality evidence that allows for analysis leading to the formulation of convincing and credible answers to the questions posed.

7 best data collection methods and tools for academic, opinion or product research

Below are the top 7 data collection methods for academic, opinion or product research. It also discusses in detail the nature, pros and cons of each of them. At the end of this segment, you’ll be better informed about which method best suits your research.

An interview is a face-to-face conversation between two people with the sole purpose of gathering information relevant to meet the purpose of the research. The interviews are of different types, namely structured, semi-structured and unstructured, and each of them has a slight variation with respect to the other.

Structured interviews

In short, it is a verbally administered questionnaire. It is of superficial level and is usually completed in a short period. For its speed and efficiency, it is highly recommended, but lacks depth.

Semi-structured interviews

In this method, there are several key questions that cover the scope of the areas to be explored. It allows a little more leeway for the researcher to explore the topic.

Unstructured interviews

It is an in-depth interview that allows the researcher to collect a wide range of information for a purpose. One of the advantages of this method is the freedom it gives the researcher to combine structure with flexibility, although it requires more time.

What are the best data collection tools for interviews?

To collect data through interviews, here are some tools you can use to collect data easily.

Audio recorder

An audio recorder is used to record sound on a disc, tape, or movie. Audio information can meet the needs of a wide range of people, as well as provide alternatives to printed data collection tools.

digital camera

One of the advantages of a digital camera is that it can be used to transmit those images to a monitor screen when needed.

A camcorder is used to collect data through interviews. It is a combination of audio recorder and video camera. The data it provides is qualitative in nature and allows respondents to respond comprehensively to the questions they are asked. If you need to gather sensitive information during an interview, a camcorder might not help you, as you would have to maintain the subject’s privacy.

questionnaires

It is the process of collecting data through an instrument that consists of a series of questions and notices to receive an answer from the people to whom it is administered. Questionnaires are designed to collect data from a group.

For clarity, it is important to note that a questionnaire is not a survey, but is part of it. A survey is a data collection process that includes various methods of data collection, including a questionnaire.

Three types of questions are used in a questionnaire. They are: fixed-alternative, scale and open. Each of the questions is tailored to the nature and scope of the research.

Online questionnaire

Various platforms allow you to create powerful forms to help you collect the information you need. Conduct research, optimize your brand awareness, or simply get to know an audience.

Paper questionnaire

A paper questionnaire is a data collection tool consisting of a series of questions and/or notices in order to gather information from respondents. Designed primarily for statistical analysis of responses, they can also be used as a form of data collection.

By definition, data communication is the process of collecting and presenting data for further analysis. The key aspect of data presentation is the accuracy of data, as the presentation of inaccurate data leads to uninformed decision-making.

Reporting tools allow you to extract and present data in charts, tables, and other visualizations so that users can find useful information. You can obtain data for reporting from reports of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), newspapers, website articles or hospital records.

NGO reports

The NGO reports contain a comprehensive and comprehensive report on the activities carried out by the NGO, covering areas such as business and human rights. The information contained in these reports is specific to research and constitutes an acceptable academic basis for data collection. NGOs often focus on development projects that are organized to promote specific causes.

Newspaper data is relatively easy to collect and is sometimes the only continuously available source of event data. Although there is a bias problem in newspaper data, they are still a valid tool for collecting data for reporting.

Website articles

Collecting data from web articles is faster and less expensive data collection. The main disadvantages of using this data reporting method are the biases inherent in the data collection process and potential security/confidentiality issues.

Hospital care records

Health care involves a diverse set of public and private data collection systems, including health surveys, administrative enrollment and billing records, and medical records, used by various entities, such as hospitals, CHC, physicians, and health plans. The data provided are clear, impartial and accurate, but they must be obtained in accordance with legal means, as medical data are kept to the highest standards.

Existing Data

This is the introduction of new research questions that are in addition to those originally used when the data were collected. An example would be getting data from a file.

The concept of existing data means that data are collected from existing sources to investigate research issues other than those for which the data were originally collected. Existing data collection tools include:

Research journals

Unlike newspapers and journals, research journals are intended for an academic or technical audience, not general readers. A journal is an academic publication containing articles written by researchers, professors, and other experts.

A survey is a data collection tool to collect information from a sample of the population, with the intention of generalizing the results to a larger population. Surveys have a wide variety of purposes and can be conducted in many ways depending on the goals you want to achieve.

Observation

It is a method of data collection by which information about a phenomenon is collected through observation. The nature of the observation can be carried out as a complete observer, an observer as a participant, a participant as an observer, or as a complete participant. This method is a fundamental basis for formulating a hypothesis.

Observation involves the active acquisition of information from a primary source. It may also involve the perception and recording of data through the use of scientific instruments. The best tools for observation are:

They set specific criteria, allow users to gather information and make judgments about what they should know in relation to the results. They offer systematic ways to collect data on specific behaviors, knowledge and skills.

Direct observation

It is a method of observational study to collect evaluative information. The evaluator observes the subject in his usual environment without altering that environment.

Focus Groups

Unlike quantitative research, which involves numerically based data, this method of data collection focuses more on qualitative research. It falls into the main category of data based on respondents’ feelings and opinions. This research consists of asking open questions to a group of individuals, usually 6 to 10 people, to get their opinion.

A focus group is a method of data collection that is closely facilitated and structured around a set of questions. The objective of the meeting is to extract detailed answers to these questions from the participants. The best tools for addressing focus groups are:

bidirectional

One group observes how another group responds to questions posed by the moderator. After listening to what the other group has to offer, the listening group is able to facilitate further discussion and might come to different conclusions.

Duel of moderators

There are two moderators who act as devil’s advocate. The main positive aspect of the focus group with a duel moderator is to facilitate new ideas by introducing new ways of thinking and varied points of view.

Combined Research

This method of data collection encompasses the use of innovative methods to increase the participation of both individuals and groups. Also within the primary category, it is a combination of interviews and focus groups in the collection of qualitative data. This method is key when addressing sensitive issues.

The combined research method involves two or more data collection methods, for example, interviews and questionnaires or a combination of semi-structured telephone interviews and focus groups. The best tools for combined research are:

Online survey

The two tools combined here are online interviews and the use of questionnaires. It is a questionnaire that the target audience can fill out via the Internet. It is timely, effective and efficient. Especially since the data collected are quantitative in nature.

Double moderator

The two tools that are combined here are focus groups and structured questionnaires. Structured questionnaires set the course for the investigation, while two moderators are in charge of the procedures. While one ensures that the discussion group session runs smoothly, the other ensures that all the issues in question are addressed. Focus groups with two moderators often result in a more productive session and, most importantly, optimal data collection.

7 tips to create the best surveys for data collection

Define your survey goal.

Once your survey goal is defined, it will help you decide which questions are the most priority. A clear and achievable goal would be, for example, to reflect a clear reason why something happens. For example: “The goal of this survey is to understand why employees leave an establishment.”

Use closed and clearly defined questions

Avoid open-ended questions and make sure you’re not suggesting your preferred answer to the respondent. If possible, offer a range of answers with choice options and ratings.

The survey perspective should be attractive and inviting

An attractive-looking survey encourages a larger number of recipients to respond to the survey. You can use images and videos to keep participants glued to their screens.

Assures respondents of the security of their data

You want your respondents to be reassured as they reveal details of their personal information to you. It is their duty to inform respondents that the data they provide is confidential and is only collected for research purposes.

Make sure your survey can be completed in record time

Ideally, in a typical survey users can respond in 100 seconds. It is pertinent to note that they, the respondents, are doing you a favor. Don’t stress them out. Be brief and get straight to the point.

Take a test survey

Preview your survey before sending it to respondents. Then, make a trial version that you’ll send to a few individuals. Based on your answers, you’ll be able to draw conclusions and decide if your survey is ready for the big moment.

Attach a reward at the end of the survey for users

Offer your respondents something that makes them excited at the end of the survey. It could be the stimulus they need not to leave the poll midway.

What is the best data collection method for qualitative data?

Answer: combined research.

The best method of data collection for a researcher to collect qualitative data, which is usually data based on respondents’ feelings, opinions and beliefs, would be combined research.

The reason the combined research is best suited is that it encompasses the attributes of interviews and focus groups. It is also useful when collecting data of a sensitive nature. It can be described as a multipurpose quantitative data collection method.

Above all, the combined research improves the richness of the data collected compared to other methods of collecting qualitative data.

What is the best data collection method for quantitative research?

Answer: questionnaire.

The best method of data collection that a researcher can use to collect quantitative data that take into account data that can be represented in numbers and figures that can be mathematically deduced is the questionnaire.

These can be administered to a large number of respondents, while saving costs. For quantitative data that can be bulky in nature, the use of a Questionnaire makes that data easy to visualize and analyze.

Another key advantage of the Questionnaire is that it can be used to compare and contrast previous research work done to measure changes.

Our specialists wait for you to contact them through the quote form or direct chat. We also have confidential communication channels such as WhatsApp and Messenger. And if you want to be aware of our innovative services and the different advantages of hiring us, follow us on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter.

If this article was to your liking, do not forget to share it on your social networks.

You may also be interested in: Research Subjects

Why visitors still make use of to read news papers when in this technological globe the whole thing is presented on web?

It could be due to a hemerographic investigation. Remember that ICTs are relatively new and not all of the digital environment has complete information on historical events or other chronological aspects. I hope you have benefited from the article. Blessings.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Please enter an answer in digits: 5 × 5 =

Categories:

The most seen.

Copy short link

Data Collection Methods

Data collection is a process of collecting information from all the relevant sources to find answers to the research problem, test the hypothesis (if you are following deductive approach ) and evaluate the outcomes. Data collection methods can be divided into two categories: secondary methods of data collection and primary methods of data collection.

Secondary Data Collection Methods

Secondary data is a type of data that has already been published in books, newspapers, magazines, journals, online portals etc.  There is an abundance of data available in these sources about your research area in business studies, almost regardless of the nature of the research area. Therefore, application of appropriate set of criteria to select secondary data to be used in the study plays an important role in terms of increasing the levels of research validity and reliability.

These criteria include, but not limited to date of publication, credential of the author, reliability of the source, quality of discussions, depth of analyses, the extent of contribution of the text to the development of the research area etc. Secondary data collection is discussed in greater depth in Literature Review chapter.

Secondary data collection methods offer a range of advantages such as saving time, effort and expenses. However they have a major disadvantage. Specifically, secondary research does not make contribution to the expansion of the literature by producing fresh (new) data.

Primary Data Collection Methods

Primary data is the type of data that has not been around before. Primary data is unique findings of your research. Primary data collection and analysis typically requires more time and effort to conduct compared to the secondary data research. Primary data collection methods can be divided into two groups: quantitative and qualitative.

Quantitative data collection methods are based on mathematical calculations in various formats. Methods of quantitative data collection and analysis include questionnaires with closed-ended questions, methods of correlation and regression, mean, mode and median and others.

Quantitative methods are cheaper to apply and they can be applied within shorter duration of time compared to qualitative methods. Moreover, due to a high level of standardisation of quantitative methods, it is easy to make comparisons of findings.

Qualitative research methods , on the contrary, do not involve numbers or mathematical calculations. Qualitative research is closely associated with words, sounds, feeling, emotions, colours and other elements that are non-quantifiable.

Qualitative studies aim to ensure greater level of depth of understanding and qualitative data collection methods include interviews, questionnaires with open-ended questions, focus groups, observation, game or role-playing, case studies etc.

Your choice between quantitative or qualitative methods of data collection depends on the area of your research and the nature of research aims and objectives.

My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance offers practical assistance to complete a dissertation with minimum or no stress. The e-book covers all stages of writing a dissertation starting from the selection to the research area to submitting the completed version of the work within the deadline.

John Dudovskiy

Data collection methods Essay

Data collection methods, importance of examining collected data.

Research is important for developments and innovations. To conduct research, data must be taken, interpolated, and analysed to give sound information about a certain issue under research. There are different methods of data collection (Pratt & Loizos, 2005). This paper is divided into two parts; part one discusses five data collection methods and parts two gives my personal research experience.

Data collection methods are divided into primary and secondary collection methods. Under primary, we have:

• Use of interviews

It is a method of data collection that involves oral questioning of a certain population whether individuals or in groups. Response from the interviewee regarding a certain question are recorded either at the time of interview or are tape recorded for later recording and analysis. Questions may be fixed or flexible depending on the target group (Kothari, 2008).

• Use of questionnaires

Questionnaires are structured questions given to respondents who are expected to answer them in written form and then give them back to data collector. The questionnaires can be sent through post, email or faxed to a respondent, they can also be hand derived.

• observation

Observation is a data collection method where the researcher uses his eyes and participates in certain activities as he collects data. Observation may be open where the researcher takes data from the occurrence of certain activities or may be closed where the observer takes data from a limited number of people (Axinn & Lisa, 2006).

• Focus groups

Focus groups are groups composed of a population that has the required information. They are collected together and the team leader who is usually the researcher asks relevant questions that lead to data collection in his area of interest. The team leader gives members of a group the chance to discus and gives their views regarding a certain phenomenon.

Secondary data collection

Other than primary data collection method, there is secondary data collection method that involves taking data from literature reviews of related material. The researcher does not go to the field to collect data but reviews data that already exists may be in books, documentaries, internet and media (Patton, 2002).

After data has been collected, it needs to be examined for quality and reliability. Consistency of data is important for data analysis thus it is important to examine and test the data collected. Extremes data are disregarded to ensure that data used for analysis can be generalized when making final inferences.

Axinn,G., & Lisa, D.(2006). Mixed method data collection strategies . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kothari, R. (2008). Research Methodology : Methods And Techniques . New Delhi: New Age International.

Patton, Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods . London: Sage Publications

Pratt, B., & Loizos, P.(2005). Choosing research methods: data collection for development workers . London: Oxfam.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, December 7). Data collection methods. https://ivypanda.com/essays/data-collection-methods/

"Data collection methods." IvyPanda , 7 Dec. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/data-collection-methods/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Data collection methods'. 7 December.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Data collection methods." December 7, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/data-collection-methods/.

1. IvyPanda . "Data collection methods." December 7, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/data-collection-methods/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Data collection methods." December 7, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/data-collection-methods/.

• History: Ancient Greek Olympics
• The variations in handwriting that lead to individual characteristics
• Systems Flowchart for FreezeTimes’s Purchase and Payment Process
• Dramaturgy of the Real and Instructions for a Butterfly Collector
• The Magnetic Tape Recorder, Its History and Technological Advancements
• Household Spending Survey in Oman 2004-2014
• Spreading and Dying From AIDS and the Increasing Spread of the Disease
• The Concepts of Inferences and Assumptions
• Benthic Macroinvertebrate
• Instruction Manual: How to Apply Kinesio Tape®
• Sample of Chart or Graph
• Breach of Data Confidentiality in Healthcare Institutions
• Information System and Modern Business
• Enterprise Architecture Center
• Business Intelligence Approaches

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Data Collection – Methods Types and Examples

Table of Contents

Data Collection

Definition:

Data collection is the process of gathering and collecting information from various sources to analyze and make informed decisions based on the data collected. This can involve various methods, such as surveys, interviews, experiments, and observation.

In order for data collection to be effective, it is important to have a clear understanding of what data is needed and what the purpose of the data collection is. This can involve identifying the population or sample being studied, determining the variables to be measured, and selecting appropriate methods for collecting and recording data.

Types of Data Collection

Types of Data Collection are as follows:

Primary Data Collection

Primary data collection is the process of gathering original and firsthand information directly from the source or target population. This type of data collection involves collecting data that has not been previously gathered, recorded, or published. Primary data can be collected through various methods such as surveys, interviews, observations, experiments, and focus groups. The data collected is usually specific to the research question or objective and can provide valuable insights that cannot be obtained from secondary data sources. Primary data collection is often used in market research, social research, and scientific research.

Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data collection is the process of gathering information from existing sources that have already been collected and analyzed by someone else, rather than conducting new research to collect primary data. Secondary data can be collected from various sources, such as published reports, books, journals, newspapers, websites, government publications, and other documents.

Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative data collection is used to gather non-numerical data such as opinions, experiences, perceptions, and feelings, through techniques such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. It seeks to understand the deeper meaning and context of a phenomenon or situation and is often used in social sciences, psychology, and humanities. Qualitative data collection methods allow for a more in-depth and holistic exploration of research questions and can provide rich and nuanced insights into human behavior and experiences.

Quantitative Data Collection

Quantitative data collection is a used to gather numerical data that can be analyzed using statistical methods. This data is typically collected through surveys, experiments, and other structured data collection methods. Quantitative data collection seeks to quantify and measure variables, such as behaviors, attitudes, and opinions, in a systematic and objective way. This data is often used to test hypotheses, identify patterns, and establish correlations between variables. Quantitative data collection methods allow for precise measurement and generalization of findings to a larger population. It is commonly used in fields such as economics, psychology, and natural sciences.

Data Collection Methods

Data Collection Methods are as follows:

Surveys involve asking questions to a sample of individuals or organizations to collect data. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, or online.

Interviews involve a one-on-one conversation between the interviewer and the respondent. Interviews can be structured or unstructured and can be conducted in person or over the phone.

Focus Groups

Focus groups are group discussions that are moderated by a facilitator. Focus groups are used to collect qualitative data on a specific topic.

Observation

Observation involves watching and recording the behavior of people, objects, or events in their natural setting. Observation can be done overtly or covertly, depending on the research question.

Experiments

Experiments involve manipulating one or more variables and observing the effect on another variable. Experiments are commonly used in scientific research.

Case Studies

Case studies involve in-depth analysis of a single individual, organization, or event. Case studies are used to gain detailed information about a specific phenomenon.

Secondary Data Analysis

Secondary data analysis involves using existing data that was collected for another purpose. Secondary data can come from various sources, such as government agencies, academic institutions, or private companies.

How to Collect Data

The following are some steps to consider when collecting data:

• Define the objective : Before you start collecting data, you need to define the objective of the study. This will help you determine what data you need to collect and how to collect it.
• Identify the data sources : Identify the sources of data that will help you achieve your objective. These sources can be primary sources, such as surveys, interviews, and observations, or secondary sources, such as books, articles, and databases.
• Determine the data collection method : Once you have identified the data sources, you need to determine the data collection method. This could be through online surveys, phone interviews, or face-to-face meetings.
• Develop a data collection plan : Develop a plan that outlines the steps you will take to collect the data. This plan should include the timeline, the tools and equipment needed, and the personnel involved.
• Test the data collection process: Before you start collecting data, test the data collection process to ensure that it is effective and efficient.
• Collect the data: Collect the data according to the plan you developed in step 4. Make sure you record the data accurately and consistently.
• Analyze the data: Once you have collected the data, analyze it to draw conclusions and make recommendations.
• Report the findings: Report the findings of your data analysis to the relevant stakeholders. This could be in the form of a report, a presentation, or a publication.
• Monitor and evaluate the data collection process: After the data collection process is complete, monitor and evaluate the process to identify areas for improvement in future data collection efforts.
• Ensure data quality: Ensure that the collected data is of high quality and free from errors. This can be achieved by validating the data for accuracy, completeness, and consistency.
• Maintain data security: Ensure that the collected data is secure and protected from unauthorized access or disclosure. This can be achieved by implementing data security protocols and using secure storage and transmission methods.
• Follow ethical considerations: Follow ethical considerations when collecting data, such as obtaining informed consent from participants, protecting their privacy and confidentiality, and ensuring that the research does not cause harm to participants.
• Use appropriate data analysis methods : Use appropriate data analysis methods based on the type of data collected and the research objectives. This could include statistical analysis, qualitative analysis, or a combination of both.
• Record and store data properly: Record and store the collected data properly, in a structured and organized format. This will make it easier to retrieve and use the data in future research or analysis.
• Collaborate with other stakeholders : Collaborate with other stakeholders, such as colleagues, experts, or community members, to ensure that the data collected is relevant and useful for the intended purpose.

Applications of Data Collection

Data collection methods are widely used in different fields, including social sciences, healthcare, business, education, and more. Here are some examples of how data collection methods are used in different fields:

• Social sciences : Social scientists often use surveys, questionnaires, and interviews to collect data from individuals or groups. They may also use observation to collect data on social behaviors and interactions. This data is often used to study topics such as human behavior, attitudes, and beliefs.
• Healthcare : Data collection methods are used in healthcare to monitor patient health and track treatment outcomes. Electronic health records and medical charts are commonly used to collect data on patients’ medical history, diagnoses, and treatments. Researchers may also use clinical trials and surveys to collect data on the effectiveness of different treatments.
• Business : Businesses use data collection methods to gather information on consumer behavior, market trends, and competitor activity. They may collect data through customer surveys, sales reports, and market research studies. This data is used to inform business decisions, develop marketing strategies, and improve products and services.
• Education : In education, data collection methods are used to assess student performance and measure the effectiveness of teaching methods. Standardized tests, quizzes, and exams are commonly used to collect data on student learning outcomes. Teachers may also use classroom observation and student feedback to gather data on teaching effectiveness.
• Agriculture : Farmers use data collection methods to monitor crop growth and health. Sensors and remote sensing technology can be used to collect data on soil moisture, temperature, and nutrient levels. This data is used to optimize crop yields and minimize waste.
• Environmental sciences : Environmental scientists use data collection methods to monitor air and water quality, track climate patterns, and measure the impact of human activity on the environment. They may use sensors, satellite imagery, and laboratory analysis to collect data on environmental factors.
• Transportation : Transportation companies use data collection methods to track vehicle performance, optimize routes, and improve safety. GPS systems, on-board sensors, and other tracking technologies are used to collect data on vehicle speed, fuel consumption, and driver behavior.

Examples of Data Collection

Examples of Data Collection are as follows:

• Traffic Monitoring: Cities collect real-time data on traffic patterns and congestion through sensors on roads and cameras at intersections. This information can be used to optimize traffic flow and improve safety.
• Social Media Monitoring : Companies can collect real-time data on social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook to monitor their brand reputation, track customer sentiment, and respond to customer inquiries and complaints in real-time.
• Weather Monitoring: Weather agencies collect real-time data on temperature, humidity, air pressure, and precipitation through weather stations and satellites. This information is used to provide accurate weather forecasts and warnings.
• Stock Market Monitoring : Financial institutions collect real-time data on stock prices, trading volumes, and other market indicators to make informed investment decisions and respond to market fluctuations in real-time.
• Health Monitoring : Medical devices such as wearable fitness trackers and smartwatches can collect real-time data on a person’s heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs. This information can be used to monitor health conditions and detect early warning signs of health issues.

Purpose of Data Collection

The purpose of data collection can vary depending on the context and goals of the study, but generally, it serves to:

• Provide information: Data collection provides information about a particular phenomenon or behavior that can be used to better understand it.
• Measure progress : Data collection can be used to measure the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Support decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Identify trends : Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Monitor and evaluate : Data collection can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.

When to use Data Collection

Data collection is used when there is a need to gather information or data on a specific topic or phenomenon. It is typically used in research, evaluation, and monitoring and is important for making informed decisions and improving outcomes.

Data collection is particularly useful in the following scenarios:

• Research : When conducting research, data collection is used to gather information on variables of interest to answer research questions and test hypotheses.
• Evaluation : Data collection is used in program evaluation to assess the effectiveness of programs or interventions, and to identify areas for improvement.
• Monitoring : Data collection is used in monitoring to track progress towards achieving goals or targets, and to identify any areas that require attention.
• Decision-making: Data collection is used to provide decision-makers with information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions.
• Quality improvement : Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Characteristics of Data Collection

Data collection can be characterized by several important characteristics that help to ensure the quality and accuracy of the data gathered. These characteristics include:

• Validity : Validity refers to the accuracy and relevance of the data collected in relation to the research question or objective.
• Reliability : Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the data collection process, ensuring that the results obtained are consistent over time and across different contexts.
• Objectivity : Objectivity refers to the impartiality of the data collection process, ensuring that the data collected is not influenced by the biases or personal opinions of the data collector.
• Precision : Precision refers to the degree of accuracy and detail in the data collected, ensuring that the data is specific and accurate enough to answer the research question or objective.
• Timeliness : Timeliness refers to the efficiency and speed with which the data is collected, ensuring that the data is collected in a timely manner to meet the needs of the research or evaluation.
• Ethical considerations : Ethical considerations refer to the ethical principles that must be followed when collecting data, such as ensuring confidentiality and obtaining informed consent from participants.

Advantages of Data Collection

There are several advantages of data collection that make it an important process in research, evaluation, and monitoring. These advantages include:

• Better decision-making : Data collection provides decision-makers with evidence-based information that can be used to inform policies, strategies, and actions, leading to better decision-making.
• Improved understanding: Data collection helps to improve our understanding of a particular phenomenon or behavior by providing empirical evidence that can be analyzed and interpreted.
• Evaluation of interventions: Data collection is essential in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions or programs designed to address a particular issue or problem.
• Identifying trends and patterns: Data collection can help identify trends and patterns over time that may indicate changes in behaviors or outcomes.
• Increased accountability: Data collection increases accountability by providing evidence that can be used to monitor and evaluate the implementation and impact of policies, programs, and initiatives.
• Validation of theories: Data collection can be used to test hypotheses and validate theories, leading to a better understanding of the phenomenon being studied.
• Improved quality: Data collection is used in quality improvement efforts to identify areas where improvements can be made and to measure progress towards achieving goals.

Limitations of Data Collection

While data collection has several advantages, it also has some limitations that must be considered. These limitations include:

• Bias : Data collection can be influenced by the biases and personal opinions of the data collector, which can lead to inaccurate or misleading results.
• Sampling bias : Data collection may not be representative of the entire population, resulting in sampling bias and inaccurate results.
• Cost : Data collection can be expensive and time-consuming, particularly for large-scale studies.
• Limited scope: Data collection is limited to the variables being measured, which may not capture the entire picture or context of the phenomenon being studied.
• Ethical considerations : Data collection must follow ethical principles to protect the rights and confidentiality of the participants, which can limit the type of data that can be collected.
• Data quality issues: Data collection may result in data quality issues such as missing or incomplete data, measurement errors, and inconsistencies.
• Limited generalizability : Data collection may not be generalizable to other contexts or populations, limiting the generalizability of the findings.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Delimitations in Research – Types, Examples and...

Research Process – Steps, Examples and Tips

Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples

Institutional Review Board – Application Sample...

Evaluating Research – Process, Examples and...

Research Questions – Types, Examples and Writing...