research paper on youth empowerment

Factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment, according to social educators

Qualitative Research Journal

ISSN : 1443-9883

Article publication date: 17 August 2023

Issue publication date: 8 November 2023

This study aims to identify the contextual and relational factors that enhance and limit the empowerment of young people from the perspective of social education professionals.

Design/methodology/approach

Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model made it possible to locate the narratives of the educators in the territory. These narratives include field diaries, i.e. hybrid narratives that include visual, written and spoken materials, and focus groups with 11 educators from different fields of action and related to youth empowerment projects.

According to these educators, the most important factors for empowering young people are their immediate environment, and the issues that affect them most. For these factors to be empowering, young people need to be accompanied, with support based on connectedness, horizontality and the creation of safe spaces and learning experiences. Both the microsystem and the mesosystem form the immediate reality for their action. Aware of this, educators do the work of connecting with the exosystem.

Practical implications

It is evident why communities are spaces with opportunities for youth empowerment, and the authors observe the need for more transversal and less welfare-based social and youth policies that generate empowerment instead of dependency.

Social implications

This methodology evidenced the environmental structures of educators and the dissimilar levels to explore and understand the work of educators and the complex interrelationships, which play an important role in empowerment processes.

Originality/value

This research presents a new perspective that allows traditional qualitative reflection to be embedded in the bioecological model. All of this sheds light on relational ecosystems with young people and proposes youth policies, in this case, oriented towards empowerment.

• Youth empowerment
• Youth policies
• Bioecological model

Llena Berñe, A. , Planas-Lladó, A. , Vila-Mumbrú, C. and Valdivia-Vizarreta, P. (2023), "Factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment, according to social educators", Qualitative Research Journal , Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 588-603. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2023-0063

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Asunción Llena Berñe, Anna Planas-Lladó, Carles Vila-Mumbrú and Paloma Valdivia-Vizarreta

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

Empowerment is complex, as it involves individual and collective psychological and social-relational processes ( Rappaport, 2002 ; Zimmerman, 2000 . From a pedagogical point of view, and according to the documentary analysis of Úcar Martínez et al . (2017) and the pedagogical model for guiding youth empowerment by Soler et al . (2017) , empowerment requires people to be able to implement and exercise those capacities. It is a time of great vitality and expansion, when decision-making and individual and collective experiences have an important impact on the later stages of life ( Dahl et al ., 2018 ).

Empowerment is a process that takes place within an environment and therefore in interaction with it. The actions, activities, relationships and structures in each environment can facilitate or limit empowerment. Studies by Doneys et al . (2020) have shown that environments and relational aspects play a significant role in empowerment processes. Similarly, Corrêa Cavalieri and Neves Almeida (2018) stated that empowerment is an active social process that occurs in relation to others and that varies according to the environment and the people involved. They also noted that it is difficult to separate the individual from the community, the personal from the environmental.

Several studies ( Cahill and Dadvand, 2018 ; Ferreira et al ., 2021 ; Naezer et al ., 2017 ) have emphasized that empowerment processes depend on interpersonal relationships; power relationships also play a relevant role. Among these relational aspects, special attention should be paid to the relationships young people have with adults, especially with those adults who play an important part in their life process, including educators. Previous studies have brought to the fore some of the differences between youth empowerment and the empowerment of adults ( Peterson et al ., 2011 ), and the role that adults should play in the empowerment of young people ( Blanchet-Cohe and Brunson, 2014 ). Salusky et al . (2014) analysed the role of adults in the processes of youth empowerment, although they gave them a secondary and flexible role. They also attributed specific functions to adults, such as encouraging, supporting, listening and assessing. The educator's role is one of collaborator, facilitator and provider of resources, facilitator of processes, and generator of environments and opportunities, rather than that of an expert.

While numerous studies, especially within the field of psychology, have focused on the more individual dimensions of empowerment ( Christens, 2012 ; Rodrigues et al ., 2018 ; Speer et al ., 2019 ), little research has analysed the environmental and relational factors that enhance or limit empowerment.

The educators' point of view, using the ecological perspective of human development

Educators are responsible for generating scenarios that enable the emotional, educational and participatory empowerment of young people. This educational component helps the relationships between young people and adults flow and circulate, leading to the development of the processes of empowerment of young people.

Analyzing youth empowerment from the perspective of educators requires taking into consideration: (a) the environments where empowerment occurs and where young people and educators meet; and (b) the interventions of educators in the environments where young people interact. It therefore seemed appropriate to adopt the ecological perspective to analyse those environments that enhance the processes of youth empowerment.

Silva and Martínez (2004) , inspired in Bronfenbrenner (2001) , saw the “empowering environment” as the ecological environment with different milieus in and between which complex interrelationships occur. According to these authors, it is necessary to differentiate environments from processes, without forgetting the aspects of the processes connected with interrelationships in each environment. Although Silva and Martínez (2004) proposed analysis by levels of social aggregate (individual, organizational and community), in this article we have used the categorization of systems proposed in Bronfenbrenner's ecological perspective of human development, given that it includes environmental, process, and relational aspects.

García Gómez et al ., 2009 highlighted the value of ecological systems theory for understanding and proposing more holistic pedagogical practices across various environments that favour meaningful learning and improve quality of life.

According to this theory, every individual is part of various social systems within which they act and define their personal characteristics, doing so conditioned by the impact these systems have on their personal development. Moreover, the characteristics of a system are also influenced by relationships with other systems.

Critics of ecological systems theory have questioned Bronfenbrenner's diagram of concentric circles. Rogoff (2003) , for example, argued that people's development cannot be separated from their social, cultural, and historical environment. Later, however, Bronfenbrenner (2001) proposed the bioecological systems theory, which emphasized the role of the person and proximal processes as central elements, and valued both objective and subjective experiences in surrounding environments and over time. This theory is based on the Process-Person-Context-Time model, which, as Gifre and Esteban (2012) stated, proposed that it is necessary to know the individual in different contexts, environments and spaces in their interactions and relationships. This approach facilitates a holistic view of the processes and factors that interact and intervene in the development of social, psychological, and personal processes, as well as the role of the person themselves in these processes.

Microsystem: the level closest to the individual. The microsystem consists of the relationships, roles, and activities that the person experiences in a particular environment, such as family or school.

Mesosystem: a system of microsystems that includes the interrelationships of two or more environments in which the person participates or is immersed (family, work, and social life). It is about the interrelationships between microsystems; for example, the relationship between a specific family environment (the home) and the centre of education.

Exosystem: environments that do not include the person but affect the environment in which that person participates. In other words, these are environments that affect an individual's life, but indirectly; for example, their partner's friends or their parents' workplace.

Macrosystem: as described by Gifre and Esteban (2012 , p. 83), this includes belief systems, religion, and the political, social and economic organization of a given region, which together mould - design, even - microsystems, mesosystems, and exosystems.

Chronosystem: the fifth and final system, which is related to the individual's moment in life. In other words, depending on the moment they are in, they will be affected by the events in their environment in a certain way.

In the results of our research, we did not use the chronosystem, as we were interested in framing the factors that enhance and limit the empowerment of young people within different social and relational systems. Likewise, we did not consider the genetic influences on development that Bronfenbrenner proposed in his bioecological systems theory.

Objectives and methodology

To provide evidence that helps understand how to encourage youth empowerment, this article presents some of the results of the HEBE project [1] . Specifically, our aim was to identify, in the discourse of educators, the contextual and relational factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment.

A qualitative methodology was used. To understand processes of 11 educators for encouraging youth empowerment, it was necessary to know what happens in the space between their knowledge and practice. This process is often automatic; the process of reflection and analysis leading to action is rarely visible. In the field of pedagogy, the co-production of knowledge between academic and non-academic communities poses a challenge that must be addressed to make sense of research ( Gibbons et al ., 1994 ).

The selection of cases to be studied took into consideration gender equality, as well as professionals with experience in four areas: formal education - regulated, occupational training, specialized education, and socio-cultural animation and leisure. The intervention encompasses a diverse range of areas, namely the role of social educators within educational centers, work integration projects, training companies, governmental organizations, training centers focused on community and audiovisual education, as well as leisure time schools and associations. The educators selected had a minimum of four years of experience, ranging in age from 25 to 47 years and their involvement in programmes explicitly aimed at empowering young people. Finally, an open call was made to all the provinces of Catalonia, and the educators participating in this study are based in the provinces of Barcelona and Girona. Each participant maintained a field diary for one year and part in four focus group sessions.

To stimulate the creative and reflective process, we suggested creating field diaries in a hybrid format (visual, written, audio, etc), with the possibility of including digital narratives ( Ranieri and Bruni, 2013 ). Most of the educators used a digital format for their reflections (combining written documents, audio, photographs and video). Some also used paper to write text, draw and make diagrams. Fifty-six text documents, with or without images, were analysed (including transcriptions of audio documents). Some submissions were not considered because they lacked reflection (a song without text, and a photograph or internal documents of the socio-educational project itself).

The focus groups ( Nyumba et al ., 2018 ) dealt with: (1) the concept of empowerment; (2) decisions made in the youth empowerment process; (3) the empowerment process and methodologies used; and (4) organization according to the importance of the dimensions of empowerment. Seven to ten educators participated in each focus group, with a member of the research team acting as rapporteur and moderator. A semi-structured set of questions was used in the focus groups, which lasted around 60 min.

The process of defining the units of analysis was as follows: (a) theoretical debate to create a list of codes that took into account the dimensions, factors and methodologies for empowerment; (b) creation of a Hermeneutic Unit from all the primary documents (four from the focus groups, 56 from the field diaries), and the agreed codes, using Atlas.ti software; (c) content analysis using cross-checking logic - a team of two researchers analysed a part of the material, it was exchanged, and once the codes for each comment were agreed on, a second group of two researchers reviewed and modified or validated the contributions; (d) sharing of the emergent codes that resulted from the first readings and the agreements on which ones to use for the analysis; (e) closure of the analysis and extraction of the first reports of codes and comments; and (f) elimination of codes of little relevance and with few comments (less than 5). Figure 1 shows the 32 final codes that resulted from the bidirectional, inductive-deductive approach to the process of analysis through theoretical emergent codes, and the frequency with which they were mentioned.

The educators who participated in this study did so freely and voluntarily. They completed an informed consent form, in which they were informed of the confidentiality and anonymization of the data. The Code of Good Practice in Research was applied: they were personally informed of the ethical principles of the research and that they were able to exercise their rights of access to their personal data and to correct, delete and oppose it. Finally, the results were communicated through the same channels through which the initial contact was established with each educator.

The results were grouped into different categories ( Figure 2 ) according to Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory of development (microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem). Factors linked to the microsystem came up most often in the educators' discourse, while those linked to the exosystem were the least frequent.

Microsystem

The educators' comments about the spaces where youth empowerment happens stood out among the factors in the microsystem: family; peer groups; neighbourhood; centres of education; education in their free time; work; and their educators.

Undoubtedly, parents have the most influence on young people and favour, or not, their empowerment. I see that when, from a young age, there’s been strong support and a positive education by the family - stimulating, accepting, constructive - the young person reaches adolescence or youth with greater guarantees of success. (51:1)

The family was seen as an empowering space in terms of: (a) the relationships within it; (b) how it interrelates with other spaces or contexts; and (c) what it can or cannot offer (family resources and tools). The educators stressed the importance of the family having an active attitude to young people's network of relationships (collaboration and coordination with the centre of education, socio-educational spaces, etc) and adopting similar criteria as educators when making decisions concerning young people.

We as teachers realized that we had to adopt other strategies to approach this young person. One of these strategies came from the group’s own need to understand him and to be able to help him as his peers; our actions until then hadn’t been effective. This boy attaches a lot of importance to his peers and needs to feel respected by them, in whatever way. (59:7)

The student with ASD just listened and from time to time he would say: "I'm not coming! Finally, his own friends confronted him with the pros and cons of coming and pointed out that the timetable can be changed (they restructured the afternoon visually). In the evening, the student came to his family saying that he had changed his mind because schedules can be changed. Sometimes we do not intervene in other people's decisions because they are theirs, but we can teach them to be flexible in certain things, without imposing or ordering them. (58:6)

The fact that many of the girls in this project had been volunteering in educational leisure spaces was a positive point, because they had a lot of interest and a strong motivation for the topic. We decided to take advantage of this and gave them the possibility to investigate their concerns further. We saw a strong empowerment that spread through the whole group of participants (a large majority of girls, almost 90%) and they immediately took responsibility for the project themselves. (14:1)

Through the project, students became involved in issues in their neighbourhood, they learned first-hand about realities that surround them but which they had never approached before, and we observed real empowerment when they took the reins of the research to ask questions about what intrigued and concerned them. (14:25)

Although the educators themselves did not do so explicitly, we interpreted centres of education as largely being environments where young people had relationships that were a factor that enhanced youth empowerment. They saw the centre of education as an opportunity, referring to the space educators and young people shared, which was, therefore, a space for relationships, for detection, for reaching out to each other, etc.

The young people built relationships with the organizations and people in the neighbourhood that will last beyond the duration of the project. The empowerment of the students can be seen in the pride they show in the video they’ve made and in the way they debate and reflect on the topic they researched in the presentations of the audiovisual works that have been organized so far at the school, in the neighbourhood, and in other places in Barcelona. (14:26)

to make young people aware that they are doing things well, because many times they are perhaps a little bit contaminated by their own environment, by the educational system that is not useful for everyone and so on, so the fact of saying, 'ls-, don't listen to me, maybe you don't do this well, but you do this really well and you are a crack at it, makes them believe they are capable of doing what they set out to do. (78:91)

Camps are a place where you’re with them 24 hours a day, doing all kinds of activities and you can also see how they interact, how they relate, the incidents that happen, if we can talk to them, if not, this has happened, we’ve been told something by the camp organizers, what you have to say, so for me there are these two slightly different analyses. One is perhaps the issue of assessment, which, as a professional, you may like more or less, but there’s the more human side or that of values, of coexistence and all that, which for us too, the fact that students can come on camps is a success for me, because it’s a very large space for social coexistence. (78:85)

One of the elements that I think is most influential in the empowerment process of young people is the fact of having to feel accepted by the peer group. Self-acceptance, i.e. “accepting yourself as you are”, is something that comes with maturity and is not something that comes at a younger age. That is why young people, who are still building their personality, tend to attach a lot of importance to the acceptance they receive from the outside in their peer groups (class, sports team, extracurricular activities …). (45:4)

… fragility has connected you to your strength. As the story says, emotions and thoughts have to be let in, observed, attended to and and thoughts we have to let them into our home, observe them, attend to them and treat them with a listening attitude always with a listening attitude because they carry a message for us. (22:3)

… when we create a bond with the young person, this credibility comes from experience … “What I’m sharing with you isn’t because I’ve read it - I may have read it - but because I’ve experienced it …” And for me that’s fundamental, isn’t it? The fact of entering into this reciprocal relationship, right? I accompany you, you accompany me, and we are both in different places, but we are doing very human work between two people. (40:54)

… It’s difficult because for some people when you get to them, they’ve already been conditioned. They may not want to get to know you because they have the preconceived idea that you’re a supervising, controlling element, that you come across as a nice person but in reality, you want to know things and you won’t be able to help … (6:6).

Often in educational interventions we transmit things more related to the climate of relationships and respect that you create with the users (in this case, young people), than what you wanted to transmit with the activity itself. By this I mean that there is a whole series of learning/reflections or impacts that you can generate with young people that are not tangible. (65:1)

They were the ones who asked us for the camera and disappeared and hid; they worked by themselves, we weren’t there with them, we didn't know if they were doing it right or wrong or if there was a technical problem or anything … And the result of letting them get on with it was that they opened up. (67:23)

From an inter-organizational perspective, that is, within the mesosystem, there were elements linked to young people's environment. Sometimes relationships were created among micro-environments or micro-contexts aimed at fostering environments that facilitated empowerment, although this was not always achieved.

I have a student who is currently discovering her sexual orientation. One day she came to me to see if she could talk to me and explained that she had met a girl outside school with whom she had become close friends and thought she was in love. She was confused. (9:7)

Having a community identity, feeling part of a social, economic, and work network that leads you to a very individual situation, I think that self-esteem is often difficult without having that community network and that feeling of being accompanied, apart from individual factors. (78:59)

I’m often more concerned about what it means in terms of networks. In other words, what kind of network you have in a society like today’s, in which it’s very easy to fall. Now that we’re also talking about a very fashionable word which is “community”, this network has been lost a lot and there are young people who have a very complicated network, not the virtual community, but the one you touch … family, friends, schools, the neighbourhood. The place where you live … what opportunities they give you. So I do think that this is very directly related to “empower yourself or get your act together”, of being able to have this network that helps you. Sometimes I think it’s not so much the social or economic class that’s important but the network that you have around you that can support you when you might fall. (40:24)

In general, I think it’s clear to say that the environment has enormous force in the empowerment of young people. Perhaps it’s important to differentiate between the immediate and the more distant environment, but both are important and need to be taken into account. (48:1)

On the other hand, the most distant environment, in my opinion, are all those agents who intervene indirectly, such as social services, coordination meetings with CSMIJs (child and youth mental health centres) or other centres outside the school, the EAPs (psychopedagogy assessment teams). I want to make this distinction clear because often, I think, a young person doesn’t know or isn’t aware that behind them there’s a coordination team working for or thinking about their welfare. But these agents are there and, although they don’t intervene directly, they know the young person and they guide us, as professionals, to act and work with them. (48:3)

… Haven’t many of you sometimes had someone tell you “That’s your opinion”? “That’s your opinion, I have a different opinion.” I say this because before when I used to talk about personal opinions and said, “This is my personal opinion”, it’s because a personal opinion is a personal opinion, with all my experience and professional background. (52:18)

Macrosystem

Working in an environment that has a lot of shortcomings and limitations in terms of management, politics, investment, budgets, whatever, well, we feel this and we live it and we know it, so when we talk or when we have contact with the people who have influence, well, let’s make them see our vision and, hell, in the end this has to be looked at, so we don’t keep quiet, I don’t know, I think it’s also important, it’s also an important point in our work in the environment, in the environment that, in the end, is young people as well. (78:72)

So this help is sometimes not accompanied by what it should be. And the other thing is that now this young person, for example, who finds themself in this situation, if help is cut off because they have just had this little disappointment and they are left out of the round of having another chance, they will go back into a situation where at another time they will be offered something else, but maybe it’s not what they need at that moment, right? (67:17)

How do I intervene so that the agent is not a limiting agent? In the neighbourhood? Do they need more economic resources so as not to fall into classism? Does the City Council have a policy for the distribution of students according to neighbourhoods or not? Are there support policies? So, we work a lot with the public administration? But of course, I'm not a salesman, I build projects on the basis of social demand. (40:32)

On the other hand, the educators described how the lack of economic resources for the application of social policies affects the quality and continuity of projects. They stressed the difficulty of implementing long-term projects that enable continuous work with young people. The educators often found themselves working with scarce resources, in the form of subcontracting and part-time employment contracts. All of this made it difficult to put into place continuous and long-term processes with young people, which hinders empowerment processes.

We often start off being subcontracted by the administration or we work directly for the administration or whatever, so this has a social, social-democratic component, but it ends up being a bit of a patchwork (78:33). Finally, the educators expressed the need to develop policies that are not specific to young people but that listen to their voice and are more cross-cutting. This would contribute to greater involvement of young people in their environment. They also stressed the importance of evaluating these policies to measure their impact. Such policies would be a factor that enhances youth empowerment.

Discussion and conclusions

Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model made it possible to locate the narratives of the educators in the territory ( Vlcek, 2023 ). Most of the elements identified as enhancing or limiting empowerment were in the microsystem and the mesosystem. The places closest to where young people interact and interrelate, and what happens in those places, were what most contributed to empowerment processes. It is probably because we gathered educators' points of view that the focus was on the systems within which these professionals work. Bronfenbrenner (2001) also discussed the value of those spaces closest to young people, although spaces are all interconnected. Interaction in the close environment helps to activate empowerment processes. On the other hand, educators identified factors that limit empowerment in the macrosystem that are more distant, specifically policies and the lack of resources.

Soler et al . (2017) also identified the spaces closest to young people as enhancing empowerment. According to these authors, spaces for youth empowerment include formal educational institutions, non-formal educational and social education institutions, associations, cultural and sporting institutions and facilities, etc, public civic spaces, the family, the workplace and virtual spaces. All of them are spaces that offer, on the one hand, the opportunity to experience empowerment and put it into practice, but they are also spaces that have an impact on the empowerment of young people.

In these spaces in the microsystem, socialization agencies stand out as enhancers or limiters of empowerment, depending on how relationships, interactions, roles and moments for reflection, decision-making and action are configured. In addition to socialization agencies, there are other positive or negative moments and situations that can become contexts of opportunity. Experiences that can be positive or negative depending on how young people live through them, the meaning they attach to them or how they adapt to them, enhance or limit the empowerment process. The actors and agents that inhabit these spaces play a role that, although secondary, is relevant to fostering or facilitating positive experiences.

Within the mesosystem, the role played by groups and the community stands out. The community is perceived as a space of opportunities for youth empowerment. It is a relational environment, with multiple possibilities for participation and action, and with a diversity of referents and formal and informal leaders who can act as catalysts for empowerment. It is also a space that favours the creation of identity. However, although it has its benefits, the community can also be closed or too homogeneous, which limits young people's expression and individuality, and may cause difficulties in creating a network. Also, the excessive dependence of young people on a collective or a network can lead to a certain isolation, which is a factor that limits empowerment.

According to Maton (2008) , communities aiming at empowerment should take into account six aspects: (a) the belief system of the group (e.g. building a positive vision of young people's expectations of success); (b) engaging activities, involving active and high quality learning; (c) a relational environment with support systems, caring relationships, and a sense of community; (d) a structure of opportunity roles that facilitate participation; (e) leadership (formal or informal) that is inspiring, talented, shared, committed, and empowered; and (f) mechanisms for maintaining and changing the environment that include an organizational learning focus, presence of bridging mechanisms, and external linkages.

The professionals who participated in the study specifically dedicated a large part of their discourse to defining some of the elements suggested by Maton (2008) . Among them, they stressed the value of support in each environment and referred to the methodological strategies used to accompany young people's processes. They emphasized aspects such as: (a) building a relationship and creating a bond; (b) having more horizontal, closer relationships - that is, seeking spaces where adults and young people share power; (c) creating safe spaces where young people can put their decisions into practice; and (d) offering environments of opportunity and learning experiences to young people. Creating these environments helps to build young people's confidence in their abilities ( Checkoway, 2011 ; To  et al ., 2021 ). However, for young people to become active agents of change and innovation, aspects such as engagement in critical reflection on interpersonal and socio-political processes, participation in socio-political processes to effect change, and integrated individual and community level empowerment should be enhanced ( Jennings et al ., 2006 ). To achieve this, work with young people must be based on listening, dialogue, and exploration, using methodologies that focus on enthusiastic participation, self-reflection, and the quest to be someone ( Bradford, 2011 ).

It is important to stress the double value of the work that educators do in the exosystem, first, as connectors or mediators between systems that can enhance the empowerment process - in other words, educators determine the intensity of the links between empowerment networks in the community - and second, as connectors within their own system, the one they have worked in throughout their lives, with their professional practice and their personal experiences. According to Bronfenbrenner, educators need to understand their own life processes and events, because they have an impact on and affect what happens in that environment ( 2001 , p. 237). The exosystem is bidirectional, so events occurring within the exosystem that have an impact on the microsystem may also happen in the opposite direction.

The educators identified most limitations on socio-educational work in the macrosystem. This coincides with the macrosystem being where they are least able to take responsibility and where it is difficult for them to make an impact. Among these limitations, current social and youth policies stand out. To a large extent, these are welfare policies that are insufficient and generate more dependency than empowerment among young people. These policies are not very cross-cutting and young people's voice still counts for little. Another limitation is the scarcity of resources for the deployment of these policies. This scarcity not only affects resources aimed directly at people, but also the quality of programmes and services (professionals' job insecurity, discontinuity of projects, professionals being undervalued, etc.) ( Soler et al ., 2014 ). As a consequence, this can contribute to the demotivation of professionals and can affect the confidence of young people in these programmes and services.

Finally, two types of limitation to this study should be mentioned. The first refers to the educators who participated in the study and the heterogeneity of the services where they work (ranging from formal centres of education to professional employment services). Although this heterogeneity allowed us to glimpse youth empowerment trends in the educators' discourse, working with more educators from services that are similar to each other would allow for a more in-depth analysis of the limits and possibilities of empowerment in each type of service. The second limitation refers to the methodological process itself, which is based on analysis of the participants' narratives. These are hybrid narratives that include visual, written, and spoken materials, with the difficulties of analysis that this entails.

The concept of youth empowerment, and the factors that enhance and limit it, appears more and more frequently in the discourse of educators and institutions working with young people. Awareness of these factors should enable and facilitate decision-making that influences the changes needed to increase the effectiveness and impact of youth programmes and services related to youth empowerment.

Analysis codes resulting from the educators' field diaries and the focus groups, with frequency counts

Empowerment factors mentioned by educators, grouped according to Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory

HEBE Project. Identification of factors that enhance and limit youth empowerment: Analysis of educator discourses and practices. Project financed by MINECO - State R&D&I Programme, Society Challenges 2017. Ref.: EDU2017-83249-R. Website: http://www.projectehebe.com/

Funding information: This study was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Government of Spain with Grant EDU2017-83249-R.

Disclosure statement: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Third party copyright permissions: The authors declare that they do not need permission from third parties to join in the reciprocal and free exchange of material.

Blanchet-Cohe , N. and Brunson , L. ( 2014 ), “ Creating settings for youth empowerment and leadership: an ecological perspective ”, Child and Youth Services , Vol.  35 , pp.  216 - 236 , doi: 10.1080/0145935X.2014.938735 .

Bradford , S. ( 2011 ), “ Modernising youth work: from the universal to the particular and back again ”, in Chisholm , L. , Kovacheva , S. and Merico , M. (Eds), European Youth Studies. Integrating Research, Policy and Practice , European Youth Studies Consortium , pp.  197 - 203 .

Bronfenbrenner , U. ( 2001 ), “ The bioecological theory of human development ”, in Author (Ed.), Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development , pp.  3 - 15 , Thousand Oaks, CA , Sage Publications , Reprinted from International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, pp. 6963-6970, by N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes Eds., New York, NY: Elsevier , doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3438 .

Cahill , H. and Dadvand , B. ( 2018 ), “ Re-conceptualising youth participation: a framework to inform action ”, Children and Youth Services Review , Vol.  95 , pp.  243 - 253 , doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.001 .

Checkoway , B. ( 2011 ), “ What is youth participation? ”, Children and Youth Services Review , Vol.  33 No.  2 , pp.  340 - 345 , doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.017 .

Christens , B.D. ( 2012 ), “ Toward relational empowerment ”, American Journal of Community Psychology , Vol.  50 , pp.  114 - 128 , doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9483-5 .

Corrêa Cavalieri , I. and Neves Almeida , H.N. ( 2018 ), “ Power, empowerment and social participation- the building of a conceptual model ”, European Journal of Social Science Education and Research , Vol.  5 No.  1 , pp.  174 - 185 , doi: 10.2478/ejser-2018-0020 .

Dahl , R.E. , Allen , N.B. , Wilbrecht , L. and Suleiman , A.B. ( 2018 ), “ Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective ”, Nature , Vol.  554 No.  7693 , pp.  441 - 450 , doi: 10.1038/nature25770 .

Doneys , P. , Doane , D.L. and Norm , S. ( 2020 ), “ Seeing empowerment as relational: lessons from women participating in development projects in Cambodia ”, Development in Practice , Vol.  30 No.  2 , pp.  268 - 280 , doi: 10.1080/09614524.2019.1678570 .

Ferreira , L. , Sahakian , M. and Ferreira , J. ( 2021 ), “ Empowerment in an ecovillage: unveiling the role of power relations in social practices ”, Community Development , Vol.  52 No.  5 , pp. 592 - 606 , doi: 10.1080/15575330.2021.1923045 .

García Gómez , M.E. , González Benítez , L. and Varela Cifuentes , V. ( 2009 ), Propuesta de evaluación y de intervención Neuropsicopedagógica en población infantil. Especialización en Neuropsicopedagogía , Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Manizales , available at: http://www.ascofapsi.org.co/documentos/2010/v_catedra/sesion_7/catedra_psicolo-gia_final.pdf

Gibbons , M. , Limoges , C. , Nowotny , H. , Schwartzman , S. , Scott , P. and Trow , M. ( 1994 ), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , Sage Publications , London .

Gifre , M. and Esteban , M. ( 2012 ), “ Consideraciones educativas de la perspectiva ecológica de Urie Bronfenbrenner ”, Contextos educativos: Revista de educación , Vol.  15 , pp.  79 - 92 , doi: 10.18172/con.656 .

Jennings , L. , Parra-Medina , D. , Hilfinger-Messias , D.K. and McLoughlin , K. ( 2006 ), “ Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment ”, Journal of Community Practice , Vol.  14 Nos 1-2 , pp.  31 - 55 , doi: 10.1300/J125v14n01_03 .

Maton , K.I. ( 2008 ), “ Empowering community settings: agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change ”, American Journal of Community Psychology , Vol.  41 , pp.  4 - 21 , doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9148-6 .

Naezer , M. , Rommes , E. and Jansen , W. ( 2017 ), “ Empowerment through sex education? Rethinking paradoxical policies ”, Sex Education , Vol.  17 No.  6 , pp.  712 - 728 , doi: 10.1080/14681811.2017.1362633 .

Nyumba , T. , Wilson , K. , Derrick , C.J. and Mukherjee , N. ( 2018 ), “ The use of focus group discussion methodology: insights from two decades of application in conservation ”, Methods in Ecology and Evolution , Vol.  9 No.  1 , pp.  20 - 32 , doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860 .

Peterson , N.A. , Peterson , C.Hl. , Agre , L. , Christens , B.D. and Morton , C.M.( ( 2011 ), “ Measuring youth empowerment: validation of a sociopolitical control scale for youth in an urban community context ”, Journal of Community Psychology , Vol.  39 No.  5 , pp.  592 - 605 , doi: 10.1002/jcop.20456 .

Ranieri , M. and Bruni , I. ( 2013 ), “ Mobile storytelling and informal education in a suburban area: a qualitative study on the potential of digital narratives for young second-generation immigrants ”, Learning, Media and Technology , Vol.  38 No.  2 , pp.  217 - 235 , doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.724073 .

Rappaport , J. ( 2002 ), “ In praise of paradox: a social policy of empowerment over prevention ”, in Revenson , Tracey , D’Augelli , Anthony , French , Sabine , Hughes , Diane , Livert , David , Seidman , Edward , Shinn , Marybeth and Yoshikawa , Hirokazu (Eds), A Quarter Century of Community Psychology , Springer , Boston, MA .

Rodrigues , M. , Menezes , I. and Ferreira , P.D. ( 2018 ), “ Validating the formative nature of psychological empowerment construct: testing cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and relational empowerment components ”, Journal of Community Psychology , Vol.  46 No.  1 , pp.  58 - 78 , doi: 10.1002/jcop.21916 .

Rogoff , B. ( 2003 ), The Cultural Nature of Human Development , Oxford University Press , NY .

Salusky , I. , Larson , R.W. , Griffith , A. , Wu , J. , Raffaelli , M. , Sugimura , N. and Guzman , M. ( 2014 ), “ How adolescents develop responsibility: what can be learned from youth programs ”, Journal of Research on Adolescence , Vol.  24 No.  3 , pp.  417 - 430 , doi: 10.1111/jora.12118 .

Silva , C. and Martínez , M.L.( ( 2004 ), “ Empoderamiento: Proceso, Nivel y Contexto ”, PSYKHE , Vol.  13 No.  1 , pp.  29 - 39 , doi: 10.4067/S0718-22282004000200003 .

Soler , P. , Planas , A. and Feixa , C. ( 2014 ), “ Young people and youth policies in Spain in times of austerity: between juggling and the trapeze ”, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth , Vol.  19 sup1 , pp.  62 - 78 , doi: 10.1080/02673843.2013.823552 .

Soler , P. , Trilla , J. , Jiménez-Morales , M. and Úcar , X. ( 2017 ), “ La construcción de un modelo pedagógico del empoderamiento juvenil: espacios, momentos y procesos ”, Pedagogía Social. Revista Interuniversitaria , Vol.  30 , pp.  19 - 34 , doi: 10.7179/PSRI_2017.30.02 .

Speer , P.W. , Peterson , N.A. , Christens , B.D. and Reid , R.J.( ( 2019 ), “ Youth cognitive empowerment: development and evaluation of an instrument ”, American Journal of Community Psychology , Vol.  64 Nos 3-4 , pp.  528 - 540 , doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12339C .

To , S. , Chun-Sing Cheung , J. , Liu , X. , Lau , C.D. , Zeng , H.J. and Chan , A.M.( ( 2021 ), “ Youth empowerment in the community and young people's creative self-efficacy: the moderating role of youth-adult partnerships in youth service ”, Youth and Society , Vol.  53 No.  6 , pp.  1021 - 1043 , doi: 10.1177/0044118X20930890 .

Úcar Martínez , X. , Jiménez-Morales , M. , Soler Masó , P. and Trilla Bernet , J. ( 2017 ), “ Exploring the conceptualization and research of empowerment in the field of youth ”, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth , Vol.  22 No.  4 , pp.  405 - 418 , doi: 10.1080/02673843.2016.1209120 .

Vlcek , S. ( 2023 ), “ Three realities and a new-found focus: parenting and disability in a time of a pandemic ”, Qualitative Research Journal , Vol.  23 No.  3 , pp. 298 - 312 , https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2022-0162 .

Zimmerman , M.A. ( 2000 ), “ Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis ”, in Rappaport , J. and Seidman , E. (Eds), Handbook of Community Psychology , Kluwer Academic , pp.  43 - 63 , doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2 .

Acknowledgements

To all the social educators who contributed tenaciously to this research.

Corresponding author

About the authors.

Asunción Llena Berñe has a PhD in social pedagogy and is a professor in the Department of Theory and History of Education at the University of Barcelona's Faculty of Education. She is a member of the Group on Social Pedagogy (GPS) for Social Cohesion and Inclusion. Her work focuses on subjects related to childhood, adolescence and youth, community development, social policy and street work. She was co-director of the Community Action collection for the publisher Graó. She worked in Romania as a European expert on the development of social services from 2003 to 2008 and has served on national and international scientific committees addressing issues related to social pedagogy. Her latest research is on migration in Europe, child participation and community empowerment.

Anna Planas-Lladó is associate professor in the Department of Pedagogy at the University of Girona (UdG). She has a background in community development and worked in youth and cultural services of local government before joining the university. She has been the Social Education Degree Coordinator at the UDG since 2014. Her teaching and research focus on social pedagogy through community development, assessment, participatory evaluation and youth policies and youth work. For further details, please visit her profiles at academia.edu , researchgate.net and https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-1880 .

Carles Vila-Mumbrú is a youth worker and social educator with over 20 years' experience in youth work and direct socio-educational action with young people. Since 2010, he has combined direct action with young people with university teaching and training and giving advice to youth workers, social educators and other professionals working with young people in the fields of formal and non-formal education. He is also involved in project evaluation and supervision, research and participation in the Catalan Association of Youth Professionals, where he has coordinated various research projects.

Paloma Valdivia-Vizarreta is a researcher in the Department of Theories of Education and Social Pedagogy at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She has a background in primary education, specializing in the planning and management of educational projects. Before joining the university, she worked in organizations that provide support for young people in vulnerable situations. Her teaching and research focus on social pedagogy, leisure, the educational and social use of ICTs, and the development of community networks. For more details, visit her profiles at researchgate.net and academia.edu

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Rap Music and the Empowerment of Today’s Youth: Evidence in Everyday Music Listening, Music Therapy, and Commercial Rap Music

• Published: 16 November 2012
• Volume 30 , pages 139–167, ( 2013 )

Cite this article

• Raphael Travis Jr. 1  

18k Accesses

55 Citations

15 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

Pioneers of various elements of Hip-Hop culture have been empowered through the ability to voice their reality and find a meaningful identity alongside others who found purpose and function in embracing Hip-Hop culture (Chang, Can’t stop won’t stop: A history of the hip-hop generation, 2005 ). This empowerment persists in various reinventions of the culture within the United States and worldwide. The present study examines whether evidence exists in research to support the value of esteem, resilience, growth, community and change as empowering dimensions outlined in the individual and community empowerment framework. Research questions ask: (1) Does youth self-expression in rap music created within music therapy sessions reflect framework dimensions? (2) Does content in commercially recognizable rap music reflect framework dimensions? (3) How well does the framework align with a model of empowerment-based positive youth development? First, data collected to examine the validity of the framework were reviewed. Next, two peer-reviewed research studies published after articulation of the original framework, were examined to investigate commonality between themes and framework dimensions. One study was in a music therapy context and another explored themes in commercial Hip-Hop recordings. Original framework data supports theorizing that rap music content actually comprises developmental narratives (Travis and Deepak, 2011 ; Travis and Bowman, 2012 ). Data in the present study further suggest that these developmental narratives are relevant for Hip-Hop in every day music engagement, in therapeutic self-expression, and within commercially available musical content. Framework dimensions also aligned with a conceptual model of positive youth development that allows specification of intervention pathways and empirically testable outcomes for Hip-Hop integrated change strategies. Results suggest that rap music is a discourse in lifespan development. Rap music’s developmental narratives may be used by practitioners, parents and researchers. The narratives exist within a framework and model that (a) provides a template for better understanding these narratives and (b) positions this understanding for use as a tool to promote and research positive change strategies for individuals and the communities that they value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Empowerment in Rap Music Listening ft. Kendrick Lamar’s “Backseat Freestyle”

“Come Along and Ride on a Fantastic Voyage”1: My Journey Through Rap Music Lyrics

Reconciling Neo-Tribes and Individualism: The Transcendence and Construction of Self Through Peak Music Experiences

Alim, H., Ibrahim, A., & Pennycook, A. (2008). Global linguistic flows . New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar  

Alvarez, T. (2012). Beats, rhymes and life: Rap therapy in an urban setting. In S. Hadley & G. Yancey (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 99–114). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Bakagiannis, S., & Tarrant, M. (2006). Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47 , 129–136.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Benard, B. (2006). Using strengths-based practice to tap the resilience of families. In D. Saleebey (Edn.), Strengths perspective in social work practice (4th ed., pp. 197–220). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bhar, S., Ghahramanlou-Holloway, M., Brown, G., & Beck, A. (2008). Self-esteem and suicide ideation in psychiatric outpatients. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 38 (5), 511–516.

Bowers, E., Li, Y., Kiely, M., Brittian, A., Lerner, J., & Lerner, R. (2010). The five Cs model of positive youth development: A longitudinal analysis of confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39 , 720–735.

Chang, J. (2005). Can’t stop won’t stop: A history of the hip-hop generation . New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Chavis, D., Lee, K., & Acosta J. (2008). The sense of community (SCI) revised: The reliability and validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd International Community Psychology Conference, Lisboa.

Chin, T., & Rickard, N. (2012). The music (MUSE) questionnaire: An instrument to measure engagement in music. Music Perception, 29 (4), 429–446.

Article   Google Scholar  

Clay, A. (2006). “All I need is one mic”: Mobilizing youth for social change in the post-civil rights era. Social Justice, 33 (2), 105–121.

Cox, W., Devine, P., & Hollon, S. (2012). Stereotypes, prejudice, and depression: The integrated perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7 (5), 427–449.

Delgado, M., & Staples, L. (2008). Youth-led community organizing: Theory and action . New York: Oxford University Press.

Dixon, T., Zhang, Y., & Conrad, K. (2009). Self-esteem, misogyny and Afrocentricity: An examination of the relationship between rap music consumption and African American perception. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 12 (3), 345–360.

Elligan, D. (2004). Rap therapy: A practical guide for communicating with young adults through rap music . New York: Kensington Publishing.

Elligan, D. (2012). Contextualizing rap music as a means of incorporating into psychotherapy. In S. Hadley & G. Yancy (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 27–38). New York: Routledge.

Emdin, C. (2010). Urban science education for the hip-hop generation: Essential tools for the urban science educator and researcher . Boston: Sense Publishers.

Evans, S. (2007). Youth sense of community: Voice and power in community contexts. Journal of Community Psychology, 35 (6), 693–709.

Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20 (1), 159–179.

Flores-Gonzalez, N., Rodriguez, M., & Rodriguez-Muniz, M. (2006). From hip-hop to humanization: Batey urbano as a space for Latino youth culture and community action. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Routledge.

Gambone, M. A., Yu, H., Lewis-Charp, H., Sipe, C., & Lacoe, J. (2004). A comparative analysis of community youth development strategies . Medford: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.

Gibbs, J., & Bankhead, T. (2000). Joblessness and hopelessness: The case of African American youth in south central Los Angeles. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work: Innovation in Theory, Research & Practice, 9 (1–2), 1–20.

Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. In B. Kirshner & J. L. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Youth participation: Improving institutions and communities. New directions for youth development (pp. 27–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ginwright, S., Noguera, P., & Cammarota, J. (2006). Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change . Oxford: Routledge.

Gomes, K., & Speizer, I. (2010). Longitudinal study on self-esteem among recently pregnant Brazilian adolescents. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 28 (4), 359–371.

Guerra, N., & Bradshaw, C. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. In N. G. Guerra & C. P. Bradshaw (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behavior and promote positive youth development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 122 , 1–17.

Hadley, S., & Yancey, G. (Eds.). (2012). Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop . New York: Routledge.

Herd, D. (2009a). Changing images of violence in rap music lyrics: 1979–1997. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30 (4), 395–406.

Herd, D. (2009b). Changes in drug use prevalence in rap music songs, 1979–1997. Addiction Research and Theory, 16 (2), 167–180.

Hicks-Harper, P., Rhodes, W., Thomas, D., Leary, G., & Quinton, S. (2007). Hip-Hop development: Bridging the generational divide for youth development. Journal of Youth Development , 2 (2) (Fall).

Hulme, N., Hirsch, C., & Stopa, L. (2012). Images of the self and self-esteem: Do positive self-images improve self-esteem in social anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41 (2), 163–173.

Iwamoto, D. K., Creswell, J., & Caldwell, L. D. (2007). Feeling the beat: The meaning of rap music for ethnically diverse Midwestern college students—A phenomenological study. Adolescence, 42 , 337–352.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Jain, S., Buka, S., Subramanian, S., & Molnar, B. (2012). Protective factors for youth exposed to violence: Role to developmental assets in building emotional resilience. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10 (1), 107–129.

Jay-Z. (2010). Decoded . New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.

Jelicic, H., Bobek, D., Phelps, E. D., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2007). Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H study of positive youth development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31 (3), 263–273.

Jenkins, T. (2011). A beautiful mind: Black male intellectual identity and hip-hop culture. Journal of Black Studies, 42 (8), 1231–1251.

Juslin, P., Liljestrom, S., Laukka, P., Vastfjall, D., & Lundqvist, L. (2011). Emotional reactions to music in a nationally representative sample of Swedish adults: Prevalence and causal influences. Musicae Scientiae, 15 (2), 174–207.

Kitwana, B. (2005). Why white kids love hip hop: Wankstas, wiggers, wannabes, and the new reality of race in America . New York: Basic Civitas Books.

Kobin, C., & Tyson, E. (2006). Thematic analysis of hip-hop music: Can hip-hop in therapy facilitate empathic connections when working with clients in urban settings? The Arts in Psychotherapy, 33 , 343–356.

Kubrin, C. (2005). Gangstas, thugs, and hustlas: Identity and the code of the street in rap music. Social Problems, 52 (3), 360–378.

Laiho, S. (2004). The psychological function of music in adolescence. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 13 (1), 47–63.

Lashua, B., & Fox, K. (2006). Rec needs a new rhythm cuz rap is where we’re livin’. Leisure Sciences, 28 , 267–283.

Leafloor, S. (2012). Therapeutic outreach through Bboying (break dancing) in Canada’s arctic and first nations communities: Social work through hip-hop. In S. Hadley & G. Yancey (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 129–152). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Lee, F., Lewis, R. K., Sly, J. R., Carmack, C., Roberts, S. R., & Basore, P. (2011). Promoting positive youth development by examining the career and educational aspirations of African American males: Implications for designing educational programs. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 39 , 299–309.

Leipold, B., & Greve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14 (1), 40–50.

Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., & Bobek, D. L. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25 (1), 17–71.

Lerner, R., von Eye, A., Lerner, J., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (2009). Exploring the foundations and functions of adolescent thriving within the 4-H study of positive youth development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 , 567–570.

Lewin-Bizan, S., Lynch, A., Fay, K., Schmid, K., McPherran, C., Lerner, J., et al. (2010). Trajectories of positive and negative behaviors from early- to middle-adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39 , 751–763.

Lightstone, A. (2012a). The importance of hip-hop for music therapists. In S. Hadley & G. Yancey (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 39–56). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Lightstone, A. (2012b). Yo, can ya flow! Research findings on hip-hop aesthetics and rap therapy in an urban youth shelter. In S. Hadley & G. Yancey (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 211–251). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Luthar, S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71 (3), 543–562.

Mandara, J., Richards, M., Gaylord-Harden, N., & Ragsdale, B. (2009). The effects of changes in racial identity and self-esteem on changes in African American adolescents’ mental health. Child Development, 80 (6), 1660–1675.

Martins, N., & Harrison, K. (2012). Racial and gender differences in the relationship between children’s television use and self-esteem: A longitudinal panel study. Communication Research, 39 (3), 338–357.

Masten, A. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 227–238.

Mindlin, G., Durousseau, D., & Cardillo, J. (2012). Your playlist can change your life . Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.

Miranda, D., & Claes, M. (2009). Music listening, coping, peer affiliation and depression in adolescence. Psychology of Music, 37 (2), 215–233.

Morgan, J., & Neal, M. (2006). A brand-new feminism. In J. Chang (Ed.), Total chaos: The art and aesthetics of hip-hop (pp. 233–244). New York: Basic Civitas Books.

Morgan, G., & Warren, A. (2011). Aboriginal youth, hip hop and the politics of identification. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34 (6), 925–947.

Nair, A., & Balaji, M. (2008). Desi rap: Hip-hop and South Asian America . New York: Lexington Books.

Newman, M. (2007). “I don’t want my ends to just meet; I want my ends overlappin”: Personal aspiration and the rejection of progressive rap. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 6 (2), 131–145.

Ogbar, J. (2007). Hip-Hop revolution: The culture and politics of rap . Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

Orange, C. (1996). A source of undesirable vicarious empowerment for African American males. The High School Journal, 79 (4), 281–292.

Payne, Y. (2011). Site of resilience: A reconceptualization of resiliency and resilience in street life-oriented black men. Journal of Black Psychology, 37 (4), 426–451.

Petchauer, E. (2011a). Knowing what’s up and learning what you’re not supposed to: Hip-hop collegians, higher education, and the limits of critical consciousness. Journal of Black Studies, 42 (5), 768–790.

Petchauer, E. (2011b). I feel what he was doin’: Responding to justice-oriented teaching through hip-hop aesthetics. Urban Education, 46 (6), 1411–1432.

Prier, D., & Beachum, F. (2008). Conceptualizing a critical discourse around hip-hop culture and black male youth in educational scholarship and research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21 (5), 519–535.

Pulido, I. (2009). “Music fit for us minorities”: Latinas/os’ use of hip hop as pedagogy and interpretive framework to negotiate and challenge racism. Equity and Excellence in Education, 42 (1), 67–85.

Rose, T. (2008). The hip-hop wars: What we talk about when we talk about hip-hop . Philadelphia: Basic Books.

Saarikallio, S. (2011). Music as emotional self-regulation throughout adulthood. Psychology of Music, 39 (3), 307–327.

Scales, P. C., Benson, P. L., & Mannes, M. (2006). The contribution to adolescent well-being made by nonfamily adults: An examination of developmental assets as contexts and processes. Journal of Community Psychology, 34 (4), 401–413.

Seidel, S. (2011). Hip hop genius: Remixing high school education . New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish . New York: Free Press.

Smith, E., & Jackson, P. (2005). The hip-hop church: Connecting with the movement shaping our culture . Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Southern California Step Session. (2000). Types of social change . Unknown.

Squires, C., Kohn-Wood, L., Chavous, T., & Carter, P. (2006). Evaluating agency and responsibility in gendered violence: African American youth talk about violence and hip hop. Sex Roles, 55 , 725–737.

Stets, J., & Burke, P. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (3), 224–237.

Swanson, D., Spencer, M., Dell’Angelo, T., Harpalani, V., & Spencer, T. (2002). Identity processes and the positive youth development of African Americans: An explanatory framework. New Directions for Youth Development, 95 (Fall), 73–99.

Tillie Allen, N. (2005). Exploring hip-hop therapy with high-risk youth. Praxis, 5 , 30–36.

Tinsley, B., Wilson, S., & Spencer, M. B. (2010). Hip-hop culture, youth creativity and the generational crossroads: A commentary from a human development perspective. In C. Milbrath & C. Lightfood (Eds.), Jean Piaget Society volume: Arts and human development (pp. 83–95). New York: Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

Torres-Fleming, A., Valdes, P., & Pillal, S. (2011). 2010 Youth organizing field scan . Brooklyn: Funders Collaborative on Youth Organizing.

Trapp, E. (2005). The push and pull of hip-hop: A social movement analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 48 (11), 1482–1495.

Travis, R. (2010). What they think: Attributions made by youth workers about youth circumstances and the implications for service-delivery in out-of-school programs. Child & Youth Care Forum, 39 , 443–464.

Travis, R., & Bowman, S. (2011). Negotiating risk and promoting empowerment through rap music: Development of a measure to capture risk and empowerment pathways to change. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21 , 654–678.

Travis, R., & Bowman, S. (2012). Ethnic identity, self-esteem and variability in perceptions of rap music’s empowering and risky influences. Journal of Youth Studies, 15 (4), 455–478.

Travis, R., & Deepak, A. (2011). Empowerment in context: lessons from hip-hop culture for social work practice. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 20 , 203–222.

Travis, R., & Leech, T. (2012). Empowerment-based positive youth development: A new understanding of healthy development for African American youth. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Tynes, B., Umana-Taylor, A., Rose, C., Lin, J., & Anderson, C. (2012). Online racial discrimination and the protective function of ethnic identity and self-esteem for African American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 48 (2), 343–355.

Tyson, E., Detchkov, K., Eastwood, E., Carver, A., & Sehr, A. (2012). Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop. In S. Hadley & G. Yancey (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 99–114). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Ungar, M., Brown, M., Liebenberg, L., Othman, R., Kwong, W., Armstrong, M., et al. (2007). Unique pathways to resilience across cultures. Adolescence, 42 (166), 287–310.

Urban, J., Lewin-Bizan, S., & Lerner, R. (2009). The role of neighborhood ecological assets and activity involvement in youth development outcomes: Differential impacts of asset poor and asset rich neighborhoods. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 , 601–614.

Veltre, V., & Hadley, S. (2012). It’s bigger than hip-hop: A hip-hop feminist approach to music therapy with adolescent females. In S. Hadley & G. Yancy (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 79–98). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Viega, M. (2012). The hero’s journey hip-hop and its applications in music therapy. In S. Hadley & G. Yancy (Eds.), Therapeutic uses of rap and hip-hop (pp. 57–78). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Wagaman, M. (2011). Social empathy as a framework for adolescent empowerment. Journal of Social Service Research, 37 (3), 278–293.

Watts, R. J., & Guessous, O. (2006). Sociopolitical development: The missing link in research and policy on adolescents. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera, & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance: Youth activism and community change . New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Watts, R., Williams, N., & Jagers, R. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31 (1/2), 185–194.

Weitzer, R., & Kubrin, C. (2009). Misogyny in rap music: A content analysis of prevalence and meanings. Men and Masculinities, 12 (1), 3–29.

Windle, G., Bennett, K., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9 (8), 1–18.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Social Work, Texas State University—San Marcos, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA

Raphael Travis Jr.

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael Travis Jr. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Travis, R. Rap Music and the Empowerment of Today’s Youth: Evidence in Everyday Music Listening, Music Therapy, and Commercial Rap Music. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 30 , 139–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-012-0285-x

Download citation

Published : 16 November 2012

Issue Date : April 2013

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-012-0285-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Positive youth development
• Empowerment
• Self-esteem
• Youth organizing
• Music therapy
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

• Publications
• IZA Discussion Papers
• Measuring Youth Empowerment: An Illustration Using the Example of Tunisia

October 2021

IZA DP No. 14760: Measuring Youth Empowerment: An Illustration Using the Example of Tunisia

forthcoming in: Journal of International Development, 2024.

Youth empowerment, i.e., the ability of young people to take control over key aspects of their lives, has become a growing concern to achieving sustainable development worldwide. An increasing number of policy interventions is targeting the youth, but to monitor the progress a better understanding on what constitutes youth empowerment is needed. However, in contrast to the area of women's empowerment, little progress has been made on determining which domains of empowerment are important for youth and how they can be operationalized with indicators for measurement. We propose four domains of youth empowerment with corresponding indicators and use a well-established methodology for constructing a composite index. Using data from a household survey in Tunisia including a sample of young adults (18 to 30 years old), we assess youth empowerment in the proposed domains, explore correlates to empowerment and assess the link between youth empowerment and youth well-being. The proposed approach can help to monitor youth empowerment in various contexts and to evaluate the effectiveness of youth interventions.

• youth empowerment
• measurement
• multidimensional index
• Middle East and North Africa region

Cookie settings

These necessary cookies are required to activate the core functionality of the website. An opt-out from these technologies is not available.

In order to further improve our offer and our website, we collect anonymous data for statistics and analyses. With the help of these cookies we can, for example, determine the number of visitors and the effect of certain pages on our website and optimize our content.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

EMPOWERING INDIAN YOUTH -AN EMERGING POWER

India is a country with 70 % of youth people below the age of 40 years. 34% of its Gross National Income (GNP) is contributed by the youth. There is a dire need to develop this percentage. The need to empower youth for a better tomorrow is vital to the financial elevation as well as increment of the standard of living. Awareness is a key factor for this empowerment, with guidance towards developing a wholesome outlook of life. Youth empowerment in any development is imperative not only for national development of an entire country but also for personal development of an individual. Youth empowerment is pursued by promoting youth rights, youth activism and in community decision making. Empowerment is necessarily a process of inculcating values to equip the learner lead a life that is satisfying to the individual while being in accordance with the cherished values and ideals of the society. At present it is the most effective mean that society possesses for confronting the challenges of the future. Youth empowerment can be defined " as the process whereby young people gain the ability and authority to make informed decisions and implement change in their own lives and the lives of other people. it is a means of encouraging youths to do great things for themselves and also to make great impact in their society ". The United Nations Human Settlements Program (UNCHS-Habitat) defines youth empowerment as " the circumstances and factors which enhance the development of citizenship and productiveness among young people as they move into adulthood. It is concerned with the adaptation of government structures and institutions to protect and deliver children " s, youths " and human rights, including the right to participation ". The word 'empowerment' means giving power.

Related Papers

sahar afzal

Pere Soler Masó , Jaume Trilla Bernet , Xavier Úcar

The concept of empowerment has become increasingly widespread in recent years. Its use is still, however, somewhat controversial and diverse, particularly when referring to young people. This article presents a systematic analysis of how empowerment has been conceptualized over the past 15 years and has been applied to young people. A systematic search of the major databases filtered by relevance provided 297 bibliographical references. The results confirm the ambiguous nature of the concept and the imprecision with which it is used, although they do link its use to three common concepts: power, participation and education. The concept of youth empowerment needs to be defined in order to highlight any nuances that distinguish it from the generic use of the term. The main dimensions associated with youth empowerment have been identified as: (a) that of growth and well-being; (b) relational; (c) educational; (d) political; (e) transformative; and, finally, (d) emancipative.

Chapman and Hall/CRC eBooks

Markandey Rai

Dr.Priyadarshani B Kamble

Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies

Nazia Malik

Ripu Daman Chopra

steve gachie

International Journal of Adolescence and Youth

Xavier Úcar , Pere Soler Masó , Jaume Trilla

NTUMOHA.COM ANNUAL LECTURE AND FRANK TALK PAPER -2015 Edition

Okeke Olughu

"YOUTH EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SUSTAINED SKILL/s ACQUISITION " Okeke Ude Olughu Industrial Research And Development Engineer, Olughu Technologies Engineers, Aba- Nigeria Email: [email protected] Abstracted Summary Skill acquisition which is based on one way to learn special skills is not normally taught in schools. It is a real world requirement that teaches somebody how to earn a living. Special skills are practical and innovation based. As a means of youth empowerment, it emphasizes the acquisition of knowledge and skills for self development, competition, and independence aimed at the enhancement of national goals. Idoko (2014) in his review mentioned that skill acquisition as a means of youth empowerment has caught governments' attention in Nigeria for over two decades. This is so because it is believed that exposing youth in skill acquisition programs will reduce youth unemployment and enhance their self-sustenance. Given this, therefore, this paper examined different skill acquisition programs established by past and present administrations in the country to ensure youth empowerment. It also discusses different youth empowerment strategies that could imbibe in the youths the spirit of self-reliance and self-dependence. The study also made recommendations such as the establishment of skill acquisition centers in every nook and cranny of the country to make the program accessible to the youths, the recruitment of competent and experienced craftsmen and women as instructors to make these programs more viable and the streamline of the skill acquisition programs to make them effective for the benefits of the unemployed youths in the country among others. Sustainability implies imbibing the Abiriba cultural heritage, using existing skills-infrastructure on ground tailored to a well-programmed plan. Therefore empowerment plus skillfulness in youths will enhance sustainable economic development. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has now given the world a better aim and impetus for subtle empowerment realization. It has made it mandatory that we today should have a global focus on empowerment. This is truly on how to empower people, the youths including retired but not tired professionals of different disciplines and crafts. Keywords: youth empowerment, sustenance, sustainability, skills acquisition, self-reliance, self-dependence

American Journal of Evaluation

Xavier Úcar

Empowerment is a concept that has become increasingly used over recent years. However, little research has been undertaken into how empowerment can be evaluated, particularly in the case of young people. The aim of this article is to present an inventory of dimensions and indicators of youth empowerment. The article describes the various phases in the construction and validation of the inventory. These phases were (1) a contrast of the inventory of dimensions and indicators against specialized published writings on youth empowerment; (2) the validation of the resulting inventory by experts; and (3) a contrast with young people through four participatory evaluation processes and six life stories. The tool is scientifically and practically useful and enables the impact of youth empowerment programmes to be evaluated; it also serves to plan and implement socio-educational processes aimed at influencing the empowerment of young people.

RELATED PAPERS

Principito.7 R.M.

Clinical Drug Investigation

Rudy Susilo

Journal of Agricultural Science and Environment

Olalekan Olaoye

Big Bang Faustiniano

ABELARDO RODOLFO CAMPANA CONCHA

Estudos Transdisciplinares nas Engenharias

Fabio Carlos da Rocha

Arpit Shukla

Journal of Dentistry Indonesia

Laura Himawan

Réka Szilárdi

Cornell University - arXiv

Leszek Marcinkowski

Sayed Sayari

Ary Setyawan

Annals of Physics

Avinash Khare

The American Journal of Surgery

George E . Cooper

ARS MEDICA Revista de Ciencias Médicas

patricia pech contreras

Ximena Ahumada

International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology

venkata ramana

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Swathi Gujral

European Scientific Journal, ESJ

Zamira Shabani

Bioactive Materials

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP

Maria Júlia Paes Silva

CrystEngComm

marzieh Ghadamyari

benjamin garcia montoya

Bettina Heerdt

Jurnal Keperawatan

Hendro Bidjuni

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS

Research-based recommendations for the european youth programmes.

Excited to read our newest analysis from our RAY Monitoring surveys conducted with beneficaries of the Erasmus+ Youth and the European Solidarity Corps programmes? We have good news – the research report is currently in its final stages and will be published by the end of June.

If you don’t want to wait until then, we have even better news – first insights and findings were discussed and presented during our last Youth Research Dialogues . The so-called RAY Monitoring editions explored data from different perspectives and various topics. You can rewatch them HERE .

Research-based recommendations for the European youth programmes. What can be learned from research for the next programme generation?

The best news: A summary of key findings from the Monitoring surveys from 2023 , with some additional insights from the 2014-2020 programme generation and from RAY thematic research projects. RAY produced this paper for the discussions at the National Agencies for Youth Business Meeting earlier this year and we want to share the document as well as below some sneak peeks with you.

KEY STRENGTHS

• Intercultural Learning At Its Best: The European youth programmes are intercultural learning at its best: safe spaces to encounter differences with positive curiosity and explore them through constructive discourse and exchange.
• European Powerhouses For Youth Work: The European youth programmes are the most important European powerhouses for enhancing youth work at local, regional and national level with an international dimension.
• Forceful Catalysts For Empathy: The European youth programmes provide equalising learning environments for young people, who develop and strengthen empathy through their participation.
• Lived Democracy: Erasmus+ Youth is a crucial safe space for youth leaders, youth trainers and youth workers to practice and live participatory democracy.
• Non-Formal Empowerment: Erasmus+ Youth empowers young people and youth professionals by drawing on nonformal learning as the basis for its educational approach.
• Lived Solidarity: The European Solidarity Corps provides a framework to live and experience solidarity in a local community context.
• Volunteer Empowerment: The European Solidarity Corps sustainably empowers young people to pursue and persist volunteering in a variety of successful formats.

KEY CHALLENGES

• Looking Beyond Mobility: The European youth programmes need to get better at recognising the democratic practices within the programmes as practices that can shape, and change, societies.
• Strengthening Diversity: The European youth programmes need to get better at strengthening, and reproducing, the diversity of European societies.
• Impact Of The Pandemic: The European youth programmes struggle to compensate for the impact of the pandemic on the strength and resilience of the youth sector.
• Consistency In Shaping Policy: Erasmus+ Youth needs to get better and more consistent at shaping youth policies, and at organising meaningful policy dialogue.
• Consistency in Ensuring Quality: The European Solidarity Corps needs to get better at ensuring consistent quality across its volunteering projects.

Interested? – Read the whole summary HERE .

RAY conducts biennial monitoring surveys of the Erasmus+ Youth and European Solidarity Corps programmes. The most recent surveys were completed at the end of 2023, gathering the perspectives of close to 24.000 project participants and more than 6.000 project team members. The monitoring surveys are complemented by selected thematic research projects, among others on competence development for European youth work (RAY COMP), digitalisation in youth work (RAY DIGI), and long-term effects of participation in the programmes (RAY LTE).

• Share on Twitter
• Share on Facebook
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Pinterest
• Share via Email
• previous post: Sustainability and green competences
• Toggle High Contrast
• Toggle Font size