contoh case study nursing

Nursing Case Study

ScienceDirect posted a nursing ethics case study where an end-stage prostate cancer patient, Mr. Green, confided to nursing staff about his plan to commit suicide. The patient asked the nurse to keep it a secret. The ethical problem is whether the nurse should tell the health care team members about the patient’s thought without his permission. The best ethical decision for this nursing case study was to share this critical information with other health care professionals, which was the action the nurse took. The team adhered to the proper self-harm and suicide protocol. The appropriate team performed a palliative therapy. As a result, the patient didn’t harm himself and died peacefully a few months after he was discharged.

What Is a Nursing Case Study? A nursing case study is a detailed study of an individual patient. Through this type of research, you can gain more information about the symptoms and the medical history of a patient. It will also allow you to provide the proper diagnoses of the patient’s illness based on the symptoms he or she experienced and other affecting factors. Nursing students usually perform this study as part of their practicum, making it an essential experience because, through this research methodology , they can apply the lessons they have learned from school. The situation mentioned above was an excellent example of a nursing case study.

Nursing Case Study Format

1. introduction.

Purpose: Briefly introduces the case study, including the main health issue or condition being explored. Background: Provides context for the patient scenario, outlining the significance of the case in nursing practice. Objectives: Lists the learning objectives or goals that the case study aims to achieve.

2. Patient Information

Demographics: Age, gender, ethnicity, and relevant personal information. Medical History: Past medical history, including any chronic conditions, surgeries, or significant health events. Current Health Assessment: Presents the patient’s current health status, including symptoms, vital signs, and results from initial examinations.

3. Case Description

Clinical Presentation: Detailed description of the patient’s presentation, including physical examination findings and patient-reported symptoms. Diagnostic Findings: Summarizes diagnostic tests that were performed, including lab tests, imaging studies, and other diagnostic procedures, along with their results. Treatment Plan: Outlines the initial treatment provided to the patient, including medications, therapies, surgeries, or other interventions.

4. Nursing Care Plan

Nursing Diagnoses: Identifies the nursing diagnoses based on the assessment data. Goals and Outcomes: Establishes short-term and long-term goals for the patient’s care, including expected outcomes. Interventions: Describes specific nursing interventions planned or implemented to address each nursing diagnosis and achieve the stated goals. Evaluation: Discusses the effectiveness of the nursing interventions, including patient progress and any adjustments made to the care plan.

5. Analysis

Critical Analysis: Analyzes the case in depth, considering different aspects of patient care, decision-making processes, and the application of nursing theories and principles. Reflection: Reflects on the nursing practice, lessons learned, and how the case study has impacted the understanding and application of nursing knowledge.

6. Conclusion

Summary: Provides a concise summary of the key points from the case study, including the patient outcome and the nursing care impact. Implications for Practice: Discusses the implications of the case for nursing practice, including any changes to practice or policy that could improve patient care. Recommendations: Offers recommendations for future care or areas for further study based on the case study findings.

Examples of Nursing Case Study

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) Introduction: A 58-year-old male with a history of hypertension and smoking presents to the emergency department with chest pain. This case study explores the nursing management for patients with AMI.   Patient Information: Demographics: 58-year-old male, smoker. Medical History: Hypertension, no previous diagnosis of heart disease. Current Health Assessment: Reports severe chest pain radiating to his left arm, sweating, and nausea.   Case Description: Clinical Presentation: Patient appeared in distress, clutching his chest. Diagnostic Findings: ECG showed ST-elevation in anterior leads. Troponin levels were elevated. Treatment Plan: Immediate administration of aspirin, nitroglycerin, and morphine for pain. Referred for emergency coronary angiography.   Nursing Care Plan: Nursing Diagnoses: Acute pain related to myocardial ischemia. Goals: Relieve pain and prevent further myocardial damage. Interventions: Monitoring vital signs, administering prescribed medications, and providing emotional support. Evaluation: Pain was managed effectively, and the patient was stabilized for angiography.   Analysis: The timely nursing interventions contributed to stabilizing the patient’s condition, showcasing the critical role nurses play in acute care settings.   Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of quick assessment and intervention in patients with AMI, emphasizing the nurse’s role in pain management and support.

Managing Type 1 Diabetes in a Pediatric Patient Introduction: A 10-year-old female diagnosed with type 1 diabetes presents for a routine check-up. This case study focuses on the nursing care plan for managing diabetes in pediatric patients.   Patient Information: Demographics: 10-year-old female. Medical History: Diagnosed with type 1 diabetes six months ago. Current Health Assessment: Well-controlled blood glucose levels, but expresses difficulty with frequent insulin injections.   Case Description: Clinical Presentation: Patient is active, engaging in school activities but struggles with diabetes management. Diagnostic Findings: HbA1c is 7.2%, indicating good control. Treatment Plan: Insulin therapy, carbohydrate counting, and regular blood glucose monitoring.   Nursing Care Plan: Nursing Diagnoses: Risk for unstable blood glucose levels. Goals: Maintain blood glucose within target range and increase patient comfort with diabetes management. Interventions: Education on insulin pump use, dietary advice, and coping strategies. Evaluation: Patient showed interest in using an insulin pump and understood dietary recommendations.   Analysis: This case emphasizes the importance of education and emotional support in managing chronic conditions in pediatric patients.   Conclusion: Effective management of type 1 diabetes in children requires a comprehensive approach that includes education, technological aids, and psychological support.

Elderly Care for Alzheimer’s Disease Introduction: An 82-year-old female with Alzheimer’s disease presents with increased confusion and agitation. This case study examines the complexities of caring for elderly patients with Alzheimer’s.   Patient Information: Demographics: 82-year-old female. Medical History: Alzheimer’s disease, osteoarthritis. Current Health Assessment: Increased confusion, agitation, and occasional aggression.   Case Description: Clinical Presentation: Patient exhibits signs of advanced Alzheimer’s with memory loss and disorientation. Diagnostic Findings: Cognitive tests confirm the progression of Alzheimer’s. Treatment Plan: Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation, memory aids, and safety measures in the home.   Nursing Care Plan: Nursing Diagnoses: Impaired memory related to Alzheimer’s disease. Goals: Reduce agitation and prevent harm. Interventions: Use of calming techniques, establishing a routine, and environmental modifications. Evaluation: Agitation was reduced, and the patient’s safety was improved through environmental adjustments.   Analysis: The case underscores the need for tailored interventions to manage Alzheimer’s symptoms and improve the quality of life for the elderly.   Conclusion: Nursing care for Alzheimer’s patients requires a multifaceted approach focusing on safety, symptom management, and patient dignity.

Nursing Case Study Topics with Samples to Edit & Download

• Telehealth Nursing
• Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing
• Geriatric Nursing Care
• Palliative and End-of-Life Care
• Pediatric Nursing
• Emergency and Critical Care Nursing
• Chronic Disease Management
• Nursing Ethics and Patient Rights
• Infection Control and Prevention
• Oncology Nursing
• Nursing Leadership and Management
• Cultural Competence in Nursing
• Substance Abuse and Addiction Nursing
• Technological Innovations in Nursing
• Nursing Education and Training

Nursing Case Study Examples & Templates

1. nursing case study template.

2. Free Nursing Student Care Plan Template

3. Nursing Action Case Study Example

4. Hospital Nursing Care Case Study Example

5. Printable Nursing Health Case Study Example

professays.com

6. Fundamentals of Nursing Case Study Example

secure-ecsd.elsevier.com

7. Sample Nursing Case Study Example

caresearch.com.au

8. Nursing Research Case Study Example

9. Standard Nursing Case Study Example

resourcecenter.ovid.com

10. Nursing Disability Case Study Example

careerswales.com

11. Nursing care Patients Case Study Example

12. School of Nursing Case Study Example

ebn.bmj.com

13. Evaluation of Nursing Care Case Study Example

philadelphia.edu

Nursing Case Study Segments

Typically, a nursing case study contains three main categories, such as the items below.

1. The Status of a Patient

In this section, you will provide the patient’s information, such as medical history, and give the current patient’s diagnosis, condition, and treatment. Always remember to write down all the relevant information about the patient. Other items that you can collect in this stage are the reasons for the patient to seek medical care and the initial symptoms that he or she is experiencing. After that, based on the gathered information, you will explain the nature and cause of the illness of the patient.

2. The Nursing Assessment of the Patient

In this stage, you will need to prepare your evaluation of the patient’s condition. You should explain each observation that you have collected based on the vital signs and test results. You will also explain each nursing diagnosis that you have identified and determine the proper nursing care plan for the patient.

3. The Current Care Plan and Recommendations

Describe the appropriate care plan that you can recommend to the patient based on the diagnosis, current status, and prognosis in detail, including how the care plan will affect his or her life quality. If needed, you can also evaluate the patient’s existing care plan and give recommendations to enhance it. It is also crucial to cite relevant authoritative sources that will support your recommendations .

Objectives of Nursing Case Study

Nursing case studies are integral educational tools that bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application in patient care. They serve several key objectives essential for the development of nursing students and professionals. Here are the primary objectives of nursing case studies:

1. Enhance Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning

Case studies encourage nurses to analyze complex patient scenarios, make informed decisions, and apply critical thinking skills to solve problems. They simulate real-life situations, requiring nurses to evaluate data, consider multiple outcomes, and choose the best course of action.

2. Improve Diagnostic Skills

Through the detailed analysis of patient information, symptoms, and diagnostic results, nursing case studies help improve diagnostic skills. They allow nurses to practice interpreting clinical data to identify patient conditions and understand the underlying causes of symptoms.

3. Facilitate Application of Theoretical Knowledge

Nursing case studies provide a direct bridge between classroom learning and clinical practice. They offer a practical venue for applying theoretical knowledge about anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and nursing theories to real-world patient care situations.

4. Promote Understanding of Comprehensive Patient Care

These studies emphasize the importance of holistic care, considering the physical, emotional, social, and psychological aspects of patient well-being. Nurses learn to develop comprehensive care plans that address all facets of a patient’s health.

5. Encourage Reflective Practice and Self-Assessment

Reflecting on case study outcomes enables nurses to evaluate their own decision-making processes, clinical judgments, and actions. This self-assessment promotes continuous learning and professional growth by identifying areas for improvement.

6. Foster Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Case studies often involve scenarios that require collaboration among healthcare professionals from various disciplines. They teach nurses the value of teamwork, communication, and the integration of different expertise to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

7. Enhance Patient Education and Advocacy Skills

By working through case studies, nurses improve their ability to educate patients and families about health conditions, treatment plans, and preventive measures. They also learn to advocate for their patients’ needs and preferences within the healthcare system.

8. Prepare for Real-Life Challenges

Nursing case studies prepare students and new nurses for the unpredictability and challenges of real-life clinical settings. They provide safe, controlled environments to practice responses to emergencies, ethical dilemmas, and complex patient needs without the risk of actual harm.

Steps in Nursing Process

Whether you are handling a patient with schizophrenia, pneumonia, diabetes, appendicitis, hypertension, COPD, etc, you will need to follow specific steps to ensure that you are executing the critical nursing process.

1. Assess the Patient

The first step of the nursing process requires critical thinking skills as it involves gathering both subjective and objective data. Subjective data includes verbal statements that you can collect from the patient or caregiver. In contrast, objective information refers to measurable and tangible data, such as vital signs, height, weight, etc. You can also use other sources of information, such as electronic health records, and friends that are in direct contact with the patient.

2. Diagnose the Patient

This critical step will help you in the next steps, such as planning and implementation of patient care. In this step, you will formulate a nursing diagnosis by applying clinical judgment. As a nurse, the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) will give you an up-to-date nursing diagnosis list, which will allow you to form a diagnosis based on the actual health problem.

3. Plan for a Proper Patient Care Plan

This part is where you will plan out the appropriate care plan for the patient. You will set this goal following the evidence-based practice (EDP) guidelines. The goal you will set should be specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely ( SMART ).

4. Implement the Plan

In this stage, you can execute the plan that you have developed in the previous step. The implementation may need interventions such as a cardiac monitor, medication administration, etc.

5. Evaluate the Results

It is crucial to remember that every time the team does an intervention, you must do a reassessment to ensure that the process will lead to a positive result. You may need to reassess the patient depending on his progress, and the care plan may be modified based on the reassessment result.

Where to find nursing case studies?

Nursing case studies can be found in a variety of academic, professional, and medical resources. Here are some key places to look for nursing case studies:

• Academic Journals : Many academic journals focus on nursing and healthcare and publish case studies regularly. Examples include the “Journal of Clinical Nursing,” “Nursing Case Studies,” and “American Journal of Nursing.”
• University and College Libraries : Many academic institutions provide access to databases and journals that contain nursing case studies. Libraries often have subscriptions to these resources.
• Online Medical Libraries : Websites like PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online Library offer a vast collection of nursing and medical case studies.
• Professional Nursing Organizations : Organizations such as the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the National League for Nursing (NLN) often provide resources, including case studies, for their members.
• Nursing Education Websites : Websites dedicated to nursing education, such as Lippincott NursingCenter and Nurse.com, often feature case studies for educational purposes.
• Government Health Websites : The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) sometimes publish case studies related to public health nursing and disease outbreaks.
• Nursing Textbooks and eBooks : Many nursing textbooks and eBooks include case studies to illustrate key concepts and scenarios encountered in practice.
• Online Nursing Forums and Communities : Forums and online communities for nursing professionals may share or discuss case studies as part of their content.
• Conference Proceedings : Nursing and healthcare conferences often include presentations of case studies. Many of these are published in the conference proceedings, which may be accessible online.

Carrying out a nursing case study can be a delicate task since it puts the life of a person at stake. Thus, it requires a thorough investigation. With that said, it is essential to gain intensive knowledge about this type of study. Today, we have discussed an overview of how to conduct a nursing case study. However, if you think that you are having problems with your writing skills , we recommend you to consider looking for an essay writing service from the experts in the nursing department to ensure that the output follows the appropriate writing style and terminology.

AI Generator

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

10 Examples of Public speaking

20 Examples of Gas lighting

Log in using your username and password

• Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
• Latest content
• Current issue
• Write for Us
• BMJ Journals More You are viewing from: Google Indexer

You are here

• Volume 21, Issue 1
• What is a case study?
• Article Text
• Article info
• Citation Tools
• Rapid Responses
• Article metrics

• Roberta Heale 1 ,
• Alison Twycross 2
• 1 School of Nursing , Laurentian University , Sudbury , Ontario , Canada
• 2 School of Health and Social Care , London South Bank University , London , UK
• Correspondence to Dr Roberta Heale, School of Nursing, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON P3E2C6, Canada; rheale{at}laurentian.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102845

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

What is it?

Case study is a research methodology, typically seen in social and life sciences. There is no one definition of case study research. 1 However, very simply… ‘a case study can be defined as an intensive study about a person, a group of people or a unit, which is aimed to generalize over several units’. 1 A case study has also been described as an intensive, systematic investigation of a single individual, group, community or some other unit in which the researcher examines in-depth data relating to several variables. 2

Often there are several similar cases to consider such as educational or social service programmes that are delivered from a number of locations. Although similar, they are complex and have unique features. In these circumstances, the evaluation of several, similar cases will provide a better answer to a research question than if only one case is examined, hence the multiple-case study. Stake asserts that the cases are grouped and viewed as one entity, called the quintain . 6  ‘We study what is similar and different about the cases to understand the quintain better’. 6

The steps when using case study methodology are the same as for other types of research. 6 The first step is defining the single case or identifying a group of similar cases that can then be incorporated into a multiple-case study. A search to determine what is known about the case(s) is typically conducted. This may include a review of the literature, grey literature, media, reports and more, which serves to establish a basic understanding of the cases and informs the development of research questions. Data in case studies are often, but not exclusively, qualitative in nature. In multiple-case studies, analysis within cases and across cases is conducted. Themes arise from the analyses and assertions about the cases as a whole, or the quintain, emerge. 6

Benefits and limitations of case studies

If a researcher wants to study a specific phenomenon arising from a particular entity, then a single-case study is warranted and will allow for a in-depth understanding of the single phenomenon and, as discussed above, would involve collecting several different types of data. This is illustrated in example 1 below.

Using a multiple-case research study allows for a more in-depth understanding of the cases as a unit, through comparison of similarities and differences of the individual cases embedded within the quintain. Evidence arising from multiple-case studies is often stronger and more reliable than from single-case research. Multiple-case studies allow for more comprehensive exploration of research questions and theory development. 6

Despite the advantages of case studies, there are limitations. The sheer volume of data is difficult to organise and data analysis and integration strategies need to be carefully thought through. There is also sometimes a temptation to veer away from the research focus. 2 Reporting of findings from multiple-case research studies is also challenging at times, 1 particularly in relation to the word limits for some journal papers.

Examples of case studies

Example 1: nurses’ paediatric pain management practices.

One of the authors of this paper (AT) has used a case study approach to explore nurses’ paediatric pain management practices. This involved collecting several datasets:

Observational data to gain a picture about actual pain management practices.

Questionnaire data about nurses’ knowledge about paediatric pain management practices and how well they felt they managed pain in children.

Questionnaire data about how critical nurses perceived pain management tasks to be.

These datasets were analysed separately and then compared 7–9 and demonstrated that nurses’ level of theoretical did not impact on the quality of their pain management practices. 7 Nor did individual nurse’s perceptions of how critical a task was effect the likelihood of them carrying out this task in practice. 8 There was also a difference in self-reported and observed practices 9 ; actual (observed) practices did not confirm to best practice guidelines, whereas self-reported practices tended to.

Example 2: quality of care for complex patients at Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinics (NPLCs)

The other author of this paper (RH) has conducted a multiple-case study to determine the quality of care for patients with complex clinical presentations in NPLCs in Ontario, Canada. 10 Five NPLCs served as individual cases that, together, represented the quatrain. Three types of data were collected including:

Review of documentation related to the NPLC model (media, annual reports, research articles, grey literature and regulatory legislation).

Interviews with nurse practitioners (NPs) practising at the five NPLCs to determine their perceptions of the impact of the NPLC model on the quality of care provided to patients with multimorbidity.

Chart audits conducted at the five NPLCs to determine the extent to which evidence-based guidelines were followed for patients with diabetes and at least one other chronic condition.

The three sources of data collected from the five NPLCs were analysed and themes arose related to the quality of care for complex patients at NPLCs. The multiple-case study confirmed that nurse practitioners are the primary care providers at the NPLCs, and this positively impacts the quality of care for patients with multimorbidity. Healthcare policy, such as lack of an increase in salary for NPs for 10 years, has resulted in issues in recruitment and retention of NPs at NPLCs. This, along with insufficient resources in the communities where NPLCs are located and high patient vulnerability at NPLCs, have a negative impact on the quality of care. 10

These examples illustrate how collecting data about a single case or multiple cases helps us to better understand the phenomenon in question. Case study methodology serves to provide a framework for evaluation and analysis of complex issues. It shines a light on the holistic nature of nursing practice and offers a perspective that informs improved patient care.

• Gustafsson J
• Calanzaro M
• Sandelowski M

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

7 steps to successful nursing case study writing.

A nursing case study is a detailed study of a patient that is encountered during a nurse’s daily practice. They are usually written by nurses in training as part of their coursework, but they can also be written by experienced nurses as a way of sharing best practice.

Case studies are an important part of the nursing curriculum as they provide students with a real-life insight into the complexities of patient care. They also allow nurses to reflect on their own practice and identify areas where they could make improvements.

When writing a nursing case study, it is important to follow the instructions provided by your tutor. This will ensure that your case study is relevant and meets the required academic standards. It is also important to be clear and concise in your writing, and to use evidence-based sources to support your claims.

If you are struggling to write a nursing case study, there are a number of resources that can help you. The following books are all recommended reading for anyone wanting to write a case study:

• The Complete Guide to Case Study Research by Elaine M. Hubbell
• Nursing Case Studies: A Guide to Understanding and Writing Them by Jennifer R. Gray
• Writing Nursing Case Studies by Sally G. Reed

Once you have a good understanding of how to write a nursing case study, you will be able to produce high-quality studies that will be of benefit to both yourself and your patients.

Importance of nursing case study writing.

Nursing case studies are an important part of your nursing education. They provide you with the opportunity to apply the knowledge and skills you have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. Nursing case studies also allow you to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

The nursing case study should be a detailed and accurate account of the care that was provided to the patient. It should be used to evaluate the outcome of that care and to identify any areas where improvements can be made.

Steps when writing a nursing case study paper.

There are various steps you should keep in mind in order to help you write a successful nursing case study.

These important steps include:

• Define the problem.
• Gathering information.
• Developing alternatives.
• Analyzing the alternatives.
• Selecting the best alternative.
• Implementing the solution.
• Evaluating the outcome.

Defining the Problem

When writing a nursing case study, it is important to first define the problem. The problem should be something that can be solved through nursing interventions. Once the problem is defined, the nursing case study can be written to discuss the interventions that were used to solve the problem.

Nursing case studies are a great way to learn about different nursing interventions and how they can be used to solve problems. By reading nursing case studies, nurses can learn about different diseases and conditions and how to treat them. Nursing case studies can also be used to teach other nurses about different interventions.

Gathering Information

When it comes to writing a nursing case study, the first and most important step is gathering information. This is where you will need to do your research and collect data from a variety of sources. Once you have all of the information you need, you can begin to write your case study.

It is crucial to gather information before starting to write your nursing case study. This ensures that you include all of the relevant information. This means including details about the patient’s medical history, symptoms, and treatment.

Developing Alternatives

Once you have all of the necessary information, you can begin developing alternatives for the patient’s treatment. This will involve looking at the different options and deciding which is best based on the specific case. You will need to consider the risks and benefits of each option before making a recommendation.

Once you have developed a few different options, you can then start writing the case study. This should include an overview of the patient’s history, their current condition, and the different treatment options that were considered. Be sure to explain why you ultimately recommended the chosen course of treatment.

Analyzing the Alternatives

When you are given a nursing case study to write, the first step is to read the case thoroughly. Make sure you understand the situation and the patient’s history. Once you have a good understanding of the case, you can start to analyze the alternatives.

There are usually three alternatives in a nursing case study: nursing intervention, medical intervention, and no intervention. You will need to evaluate each alternative and decide which is best for the patient.

Nursing intervention is usually the first choice because it is the least invasive and has the least risk. Medical intervention is usually the next choice because it is more invasive but has a higher chance of success. No intervention is usually the last choice because it means doing nothing and letting the patient’s condition worsen.

Once you have evaluated the alternatives, you can start to write your case study. Remember to include all of the important information, such as the patient’s history, the alternatives you considered, and your recommendation.

Selecting the Best Alternative

When you are presented with a nursing case study, the first thing you need to do is identify the problem. Once you have identified the problem, you need to gather information about the patient. This information will help you to develop a plan of care. Once you have developed a plan of care, you need to select the best alternative.

The best alternative is the one that will best meet the needs of the patient. When selecting the best alternative, you need to consider the patient’s preferences, the severity of the problem, the risks and benefits of each alternative, and the resources available.

Implementing the Solution

Once you have selected the best alternative, you need to implement the plan of care. After you have implemented the plan of care, you need to evaluate the patient’s response. If the patient’s condition improves, you need to continue the plan of care. If the patient’s condition does not improve, you need to reevaluate the plan of care and select a different alternative.

Evaluating the Outcome

A nursing case study is a detailed account of a patient’s medical history and treatment. It is used to evaluate the outcome of a patient’s care and to identify any areas where improvements can be made.

When writing a nursing case study, it is important to include a detailed description of the patient’s symptoms and medical history. The case study should also include a discussion of the treatment that was provided and the outcome of that treatment.

It is also important to discuss any areas where improvements could be made in the care that was provided. This could include changes to the treatment plan, changes to the way that the patient was monitored, or changes to the way that the patient’s symptoms were managed.

Conclusion.

Writing a successful nursing case study can be a challenging task. However, by following the steps provided in this blog that is, first defining the problem, gathering information, developing alternatives., analyzing the alternatives, selecting the best alternative, implementing the solution and evaluating the outcome. You will be able to write a top-notch nursing case study that meets your requirements.

If you need professional assistance, place your order right here to get help from expert nursing paper writers.

Work with professional online writers

• Affordable Nursing Papers
• Nursing Coursework Writing
• Nursing Essay Writing Service
• Nursing Essay Assignments
• Nursing Assignment Writing
• Nursing Case Study Writing
• Nursing Process Essay Writing
• Nursing Capstone Project
• BSN Capstone Project
• Reliable Nursing Writers
• PICO Question Examples
• Nursing Speeches
• Nursing PowerPoint Presentations
• Online Nursing Essay Writers
• Nursing Thesis
• Nursing Coursework
• Nursing Term Papers
• Legit Nursing Writers
• Best Nursing Writing Company
• Nursing Students Writing Help
• Cheap Nursing Term Paper

• Refund Guarantee
• On time delivery
• Plagiarism-free papers
• Safe and Confidential
• Trained Writers
• Nursing Essay Writing
• Nursing Coursework Help
• Nursing Dissertations
• Nursing Case Studies
• Nursing Assignment Help

Contact Info

• 123 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 12004, United States.
• +1(413) 798-7210
• [email protected]

Library buildings are open for UniSA staff and students via UniSA ID swipe cards.   Please contact us on Ask the Library for any assistance. Find out about other changes to Library services .

• Develop your research question
• Search for your assignment
• Find books and journal articles
• Find evidence (Government and organisation information)
• Data & statistics
• Forgotten Australians
• Clinical skills
• Aged care & mental health
• Mental health resources: 0-65 years
• Finding resources for your assignment
• HLTH 1036: Global and National Health – A1 Task 2 & A2
• HLTH 1047: First Peoples' Health – A1
• NURS 1072: Foundations of Nursing Practice

NURS 2023: Health of Adults - Nursing Case Study Report

• NURS 2024: Health of Older Adults
• NURS 5164: Best Practice in Adolescent Mental Health
• NURS 3055: Evidence Based Nursing Practice
• NURS 3045: Nursing Context of Practice: Primary Health Care
• UniSA Online - NURS 1066: Living Skills and Life Routines in Aged Care

NURS 2023: Health of Adults

This assignment requires you to complete a  nursing case study of 2500 words.                                              

This assignment help assumes you have read your course outline. For full assessment details, please refer to your course outline .

Nursing standards, safety and quality standards

The following resources may also be useful:

• Nursing and Midwifery Board: Professional Standards Codes of conduct, standards for practice, and codes of ethics
• Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses Nurse's care planning process

Plan your search

Key points from the video.

• Searching for your whole assignment is not very effective
• Mapping out your search is a good place to start
• Identify the key concepts in your question or topic
• You don't need to search for task words
• Use double quotation marks (" ") to search for two or more words together as a phrase
• Think about what other words (synonyms and alternative terms) might be used to describe the key concepts
• You can use acronyms, but you should search for the full terms as well
• To find fewer results, add different concepts using AND (e.g. rural AND Australia)
• To find more results, add synonyms or alternative terms, to your search using OR (e.g. "renewable energy" OR solar OR wind)
• You can change your search as you find more information
• For more information, read the  How to plan your search  document
• How to plan your search (PDF) A short guide on steps you need to plan your search, including how to combine your search terms using OR, AND, NOT.

Search Strategies

After watching the above video you can now start by identifying the concepts (main ideas) from your assignment topic prior to searching.  Consider alternative words for these concepts which, together with the concept term, become your searchable keywords.

Question: Prepare a best-practice care plan for teenage patients with type 2 diabetes

Create your search

Use the tools described in the video above to create an effective search.

• Plan your search (Nursing) Learn more about planning your search for your assignment in this Library guide.

Search the Library Collection

The Library Collection can be a useful starting point in locating quality information.

Use it to find:

• books or ebooks
• journals or journal articles
• conference papers and newspaper articles
• Library Collection

Search in databases

Journal articles are often found in databases .

Useful databases to search:

• MEDLINE (via Ovid) A large biomedical database produced by the US National Library of Medicine, MEDLINE is key for health-related topics. Indexed with the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and with records from 1946 to current, primarily for scholarly journal articles. MEDLINE via Ovid is recommended for systematic searches rather than via the free PubMed.
• Scopus One of the largest multidisciplinary bibliographic databases, Scopus covers peer reviewed journals, trade journals, books and book chapters, conference papers and patents. Also provides backward and forward citation searching, publication metrics and analytical features
• Health Collection (via Informit) Covers health-related material from and about Australia, New Zealand, the Pacific and South East Asia. Focuses on nursing and allied health, with key subjects including public health, patient care, aged care, Aboriginal Australians, child welfare and family violence.

Database limits and filters

Database limits and filters may be applied to reduce your search results if you have too many.  Some useful limits include 'English Language' or date. Note the following about using limits:

Using a limit only applies to the database you are currently searching. If you have selected more than one, only the results from the filtered database will display.

If the database is bibliographic (abstract) only – it won’t find any full-text. Using a full text limiter will therefore yield 0 results.

If you limit your results, there is always the potential that you could miss some important/useful research. 

Peer-reviewed journals

Articles from peer-reviewed journals are of high quality and can be used to support the argument that you are presenting. Articles in peer-reviewed journals must go through an evaluation process with experts in the field before being published. The term refereed is also used. 

Watch the following video to learn more about scholarly sources.

• Often you will be asked to use scholarly, academic, or peer-reviewed sources in your assignment.
• Scholarly sources (also called academic sources) can include journal articles, books, conference papers, and theses.
• Sources such as Wikipedia, newspapers, magazines, trade journals, newsletters, blogs, social media and personal websites are called popular sources.
• is written by researchers within a subject area,
• reports on research findings,
• contains comprehensive in-text citations and a reference list or bibliography,
• uses specialised terminology and a formal writing style, and
• is often peer-reviewed or refereed.
• A peer-reviewed or refereed journal article is assessed by experts within the field before it is published.
• author details including affiliations with organisations,
• an abstract which summarises the article,
• evidence of research findings, and
• in-text citations and a reference list.
• When searching in the Library Catalogue or databases, you can filter for scholarly, academic, or peer-reviewed resources.
• is written by an expert,
• is published by a reputable publisher,
• has a table of contents,
• provides in depth subject information,
• includes an index of terms, and
• has in-text citations and a reference list.

Select appropriate references

You should critically evaluate all resources found to determine their appropriateness for your assignment. The video below explains more.

• Having access to a lot of information can be overwhelming.
• Evaluating information helps you decide what resources you should use.
• One technique you can use is the  CRAAP test .
• Currency:  How recent is the information? Does it suit your needs?
• Relevance:  Is the information relevant to your assignment?
• Authority:  Who wrote the information? Are they an expert?
• Accuracy:  Is the information accurate? Is it supported by evidence?
• Purpose:  Why was the resource created? Is there any bias?
• You can use the CRAAP tool to think about these issues when evaluating your resources.

Write your assignment

Visit the Student Engagement Unit's  Study Help  website for help writing your assignment, or to make an appointment with SEU staff.

• Study help: Writing case studies
• Study help: Writing and academic language Printable resources and videos to help you structure, format and write your assignment using appropriate language.

Referencing support

• Referencing website Help with various referencing styles. Find in-text citations and reference examples from different sources such as articles, books and chapters, websites and more. Always check your Course Outline or LearnOnline site for the citation style required for your course.

Other referencing support tools: Referencing software (EndNote)

What do you do with all those references you have found? Use a bibliographic management software to store, organise and cite your references.

The Library supports the bibliographic management tool EndNote. There are also many free systems available.

EndNote Guide

If you need help, just ask!

• << Previous: NURS 1072: Foundations of Nursing Practice
• Next: NURS 2024: Health of Older Adults >>
• Last Updated: Apr 5, 2024 12:11 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/Nursing

The text within this Guide is licensed CC BY 4.0 . Image licenses can be found within the image attributions document on the last page of the Guide. Ask the Library for information about reuse rights for other content within this Guide.

Fastest Nurse Insight Engine

• MEDICAL ASSISSTANT
• Abdominal Key
• Anesthesia Key
• Basicmedical Key
• Otolaryngology & Ophthalmology
• Musculoskeletal Key
• Obstetric, Gynecology and Pediatric
• Oncology & Hematology
• Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
• Clinical Dentistry
• Radiology Key
• Thoracic Key
• Veterinary Medicine
• Gold Membership

Case study of a patient living with diabetes mellitus

16 Case study of a patient living with diabetes mellitus Anne Claydon Chapter aims • To provide you with a case study of a patient who is living with diabetes together with the rationale for care • To encourage you to research and deepen your knowledge of diabetes Introduction This chapter provides you with an example of the nursing care that a patient with type 1 diabetes might require. The case study has been written by a diabetes nurse specialist and provides you with a patient profile to enable you to understand the context of the patient. The case study aims to guide you through the assessment, nursing action and evaluation of a patient with type 1 diabetes together with the rationale for care. Being in this community of practice has also enlightened me about diabetes as we come across many patients with diabetes. I have since learnt different ways of diabetes management. I can also give advice to patients suffering from diabetes bearing in mind that this is evidence based. (Patricia Moyo, third-year student nurse) Activity Chapter 1 gives a brief definition of diabetes and asks you to revise the normal anatomy and physiology of the endocrine system (see Montague et al 2005 ). How can diabetes affect the body and what happens within the body when a person’s blood sugars become unstable? The following paper outlines the latest guidelines for the care of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). It would be useful to read these guidelines before you read the case study: Joint British Diabetes Societies Inpatient Care Group (2010) . The management of diabetic ketoacidosis in adults. NHS Diabetes, London. Online. Available at: http://www.bsped.org.uk/professional/guidelines/docs/DKAManagementOfDKAinAdultsMarch20101.pdf (accessed July 2011) Patient profile Lucy is an 18-year-old university student in her first year and is living in student accommodation. Lucy has had type 1 diabetes since the age of 13. Her parents are very supportive but naturally worried about her leaving home. Lucy had a take-away chicken meal 2 days ago and since then she has been vomiting and has diarrhoea. She stopped taking her insulin as she is not eating. She has been admitted with DKA. Assessment on admission Lucy is apyrexial and has not vomited for 6 hours. Her vital signs are: pulse 96 beats per minute, blood pressure 130/80 mmHg, respiratory rate slightly raised at 18 per minute. Due to her diarrhoea and vomiting, she is dehydrated. Ketones are + 2 on a standard urine stick, her blood glucose is 16 mmol/L and her venous pH is 7.2. Activity See Appendix 4 in Holland et al (2008) for possible questions to consider during the assessment stage of care planning. Lucy’s problems Based on your assessment of Lucy, the following problems should form the basis of your care plan: • Due to DKA, Lucy is dehydrated and has electrolyte imbalance. • Lucy lacks knowledge about the precipitating factors of DKA and how to prevent it. Lucy’s nursing care plan – acute stage (first hour) The most important therapeutic intervention for DKA in the acute stage is appropriate fluid replacement followed by insulin administration. Problem: Due to DKA, Lucy is dehydrated and has electrolyte imbalance. Goal: Lucy will maintain urine output > 30 mL hour. Lucy will have elastic skin turgor and moist, pink mucous membranes. Nursing action Rationale Measure and record urine output hourly Report urine output < 30 mL for 2 consecutive hours Catheterise Lucy Provide catheter care Lucy may undergo osmotic diuresis and have excessive urine output Measure fluid output accurately Maintain catheter hygiene at all time to prevent infection Administer intravenous therapy as prescribed and ensure that a cannula care plan is in place for this To prevent infection/complications around the cannula site Assess Lucy for signs of dehydration Assess Lucy’s skin turgor, mucous membranes and complaints of thirst Testing the skin; dry membranes and thirst are all signs of dehydration Continuous measurement of Lucy’s vital signs during this acute stage of DKA As Lucy has DKA and is dehydrated, compensatory mechanisms take place that may result in peripheral vasoconstriction which is characterised b a weak thready pulse, hypotension and Lucy may look pale Monitor Lucy’s neurological state Observe and document how awake Lucy is Assess how alert and orientated Lucy is to time and place Mental status in DKA can be altered due to severe volume depletion and electrolyte imbalance Monitor Lucy’s blood glucose levels every 15 minutes, then hourly as long as the insulin infusion continues Remember to wash Lucy’s hands to remove any contaminants that might alter the results Glucose levels need to be reduced gradually to prevent the risk of cerebral oedema Intravenous insulin therapy needs to continue until ketoacidosis is resolved Assess Lucy for signs of hypokalaemia, for example muscle weakness, shallow respirations, cramping and confusion DKA can cause excretion of potassium Insulin therapy results in intracellular movement of potassium resulting in low potassium levels Lucy may have signs of hyperkalaemia Assess Lucy for any weakness or irritability, ECG changes such as tall, peaked T waves, QRS and prolonged PR intervals may suggest this Potassium levels should be kept between 4 and 5 mmol/L As ketoacidosis resolves, potassium levels can rise quickly causing hyperkalaemia Ensure that the ECG leads are connected correctly and that the pads are not causing discomfort to Lucy’s skin Assess Lucy for signs of metabolic acidosis Lucy may show signs of being drowsy, she may have Kausmaul respirations, confusion and her breath may smell of pear drops Lucy may have metabolic acidosis due to a build up of ketones in her blood Measure Lucy’s serum ketone levels using a hand-held ketones meter Check ketones 4 hourly Blood glucose should be checked by a hand-held ketones meter This provides direct results for DKA to be resolved Ketonaemia has to be suppressed Lucy will need intravenous insulin during the acute stage Lucy will require fixed-rate intravenous infusion of insulin calculated on 0.1 units/kg The fixed rate of insulin may have to be adjusted in insulin resistance if the ketone concentration does not fall fast enough Aim for a reduction of blood ketone concentration by 0.5 mmol/L/hour Insulin has the following effects: • Reduction of blood glucose

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related posts:

• Medical placements
• Revision and future learning
• The end of the journey
• Medicines management

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Comments are closed for this page.

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

This website is intended for healthcare professionals

• { $refs.search.focus(); })" aria-controls="searchpanel" :aria-expanded="open" class="hidden lg:inline-flex justify-end text-gray-800 hover:text-primary py-2 px-4 lg:px-0 items-center text-base font-medium"> Search

Search menu

Akhtar N, Lee L Utilization and complications of central venous access devices in oncology patients. Current Oncology.. 2021; 28:(1)367-377 https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010039

BD ChloraPrep: summary of product characteristics.. 2021; https://www.bd.com/en-uk/products/infection-prevention/chloraprep-patient-preoperative-skin-preparation/chloraprep-smpc-pil-msds

Chloraprep 10.5ml applicator.. 2022a; https://www.bd.com/en-uk/products/infection-prevention/chloraprep-patient-preoperative-skin-preparation/chloraprep-patient-preoperative-skin-preparation-product-line/chloraprep-105-ml-applicator

Chloraprep 3ml applicator.. 2022b; https://www.bd.com/en-uk/products/infection-prevention/chloraprep-patient-preoperative-skin-preparation/chloraprep-patient-preoperative-skin-preparation-product-line/chloraprep-3-ml-applicator

Website.. 2021; https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/preventinfections/providers.htm

Ceylan G, Topal S, Turgut N, Ozdamar N, Oruc Y, Agin H, Devrim I Assessment of potential differences between pre-filled and manually prepared syringe use during vascular access device management in a pediatric intensive care unit. https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211015500

Clare S, Rowley S Best practice skin antisepsis for insertion of peripheral catheters. Br J Nurs.. 2021; 30:(1)8-14 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.1.8

Caguioa J, Pilpil F, Greensitt C, Carnan D HANDS: standardised intravascular practice based on evidence. Br J Nurs.. 2012; 21:(14)S4-S11 https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup14.S4

Easterlow D, Hoddinott P, Harrison S Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices. J Clin Nurs.. 2010; 19:(5-6)721-727 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03098.x

Florman S, Nichols RL Current approaches for the prevention of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Dis.. 2007; 3:(1)51-61 https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2007.51.61

Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle M Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs.. 2021; 44:(S1)S1-S224 https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396

Guenezan J, Marjanovic N, Drugeon B Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, openlabel, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial [published correction appears in Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 6]. Lancet Infect Dis.. 2021; 21:(7)1038-1048 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30738-6

Gunka V, Soltani P, Astrakianakis G, Martinez M, Albert A, Taylor J, Kavanagh T Determination of ChloraPrep® drying time before neuraxial anesthesia in elective cesarean delivery: a prospective observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth.. 2019; 38:19-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.10.012

Ishikawa K, Furukawa K Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia due to central venous catheter infection: a clinical comparison of infections caused by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains. Cureus.. 2021; 13:(7) https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16607

Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ Epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect.. 2014; 86:(S1)S1-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2

Promoting safer use of injectable medicines.. 2007; https://healthcareea.vctms.co.uk/assets/content/9652/4759/content/injectable.pdf

Standards for infusion therapy. 4th edn.. 2016; https://www.rcn.org.uk/clinical-topics/Infection-prevention-and-control/Standards-for-infusion-therapy

Taxbro K, Chopra V Appropriate vascular access for patients with cancer. Lancet.. 2021; 398:(10298)367-368 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00920-X

Case Studies

Gema munoz-mozas.

Vascular Access Advanced Nurse Practitioner—Lead Vascular Access Nurse, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View articles · Email Gema

Colin Fairhurst

Vascular Access Advanced Clinical Practitioner, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust

View articles

Simon Clare

Research and Practice Development Director, The Association for Safe Aseptic Practice

View articles · Email Simon

Intravenous (IV) access, both peripheral and central, is an integral part of the patient care pathways for diagnosing and treating cancer. Patients receiving systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) are at risk for developing infections, which may lead to hospitalisation, disruptions in treatment schedules and even death ( Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021 ). However, infection rates can be reduced and general patient outcomes improved with the evidence-based standardisation of IV practice, and the adoption of the appropriate equipment, such as peripheral IV cannulas, flushing solutions and sterile IV dressings ( Easterlow et al, 2010 ).

Cancer treatment frequently involves the use of central venous catheters (CVCs)-also referred to as central venous access devices (CVADs)—which can represent a lifeline for patients when used to administer all kinds of IV medications, including chemotherapy, blood products and parenteral nutrition. They can also be used to obtain blood samples, which can improve the patient’s quality of life by reducing the need for peripheral stabs from regular venepunctures ( Taxbro and Chopra, 2021 ). CVCs are relatively easy to insert and care for; however, they are associated with potential complications throughout their insertion and maintenance.

One serious complication of CVC use is catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), which can increase morbidity, leading to prolonged hospitalisation and critical use of hospital resources ( Akhtar and Lee, 2021 ). Early-onset CRBSIs are commonly caused by skin pathogens, and so a cornerstone of a CRBSI prevention is skin antisepsis at the time of CVC insertion. Appropriate antisepsis (decontamination/preparation) of the site for CVC insertion can prevent the transmission of such skin pathogens during insertion, while reducing the burden of bacteria on the CVC exit site ( Loveday et al, 2014 ).

Evidence-based practice for the prevention of a CRBSIs and other healthcare-associated infections recommends skin antisepsis prior to insertion of a vascular-access device (VAD) using a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution. This is recommended in guidelines such as epic3 ( Loveday et al, 2014 ), the Standards for Infusion Therapy ( Royal College of Nursing, 2016 ) and the Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice ( Gorski et al, 2021 ). A strong evidenced-backed product such as BD ChloraPrep™ ( Figure 1 ) has a combination of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol that provides broad-spectrum rapid-action antisepsis, while the applicators facilitate a sterile, single-use application that eliminates direct hand-to-patient contact, helping to reduce cross-contamination and maintaining sterile conditions ( BD, 2021 ). The BD ChloraPrep™ applicator’s circular head allows precise antisepsis of the required area, and the sponge head helps to apply gentle friction in back-and-forth motion to penetrate the skin layers ( BD, 2021 ). BD ChloraPrep’s rapidacting, persistent and broad-spectrum characteristics and proven applicator system ( Florman and Nichols, 2007 ) make it a vital part of the policy and protocol for insertion, care and maintenance of CVCs in specialist cancer centres such as the Royal Marsden. Meanwhile, the use of BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringe ( Figure 2 ), a prefilled normal saline (0.9% sodium choride) syringe, is established practice for the flushing regime of VADs in many NHS Trusts.

The following five case studies present examples from personal experience of clinical practice that illustrate how and why clinicians in oncology and other disciplines use BD ChloraPrep ™ and BD PosiFlush ™ Prefilled Saline Syringe in both adult and paediatric patients.

Case study 1 (Andy)

Andy was a 65-year-old man being treated for metastatic colorectal cancer at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust specialist cancer service, which provides state-of-the-art treatment to over 60 000 patients each year.

Andy had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placed at the onset of his chemotherapy treatment to facilitate IV treatment. While in situ, PICCs require regular maintenance to minimise associated risks. This consists of a weekly dressing change to minimise infection and a weekly flush to maintain patency, if not in constant use. For ambulatory patients, weekly PICC maintenance can be carried out either in the hospital outpatient department or at home by a district nurse or family member trained to do so. Patients, relatives, carers and less-experienced nurses involved in PICC care (flushing and dressing) can watch a video on the Royal Marsden website as an aide memoir.

Initially, Andy decided to have his weekly PICC maintenance at the hospital’s nurse-led clinic for the maintenance of CVCs. At the clinic, Andy’s PICC dressing change and catheter flushing procedures were performed by a nursing associate (NA), who, having completed the relevant competences and undergone supervised practise, could carry out weekly catheter maintenance and access PICC for blood sampling.

In line with hospital policy, the PICC dressing change was performed under aseptic non-touch technique (ANTT) using a dressing pack and sterile gloves. After removal of the old dressing, the skin around the entry site and the PICC was cleaned with a 3 ml BD ChloraPrep™ applicator, using back-andforth strokes for 30 seconds and allowing the area to air dry completely before applying the new dressing. As clarified in a recent article on skin antisepsis (Clare and Rowley, 2020), BD ChloraPrep™ applicator facilitated a sterile, single-use application that eliminates direct hand-to-patient contact, which help reduce cross-contamination and maintaining ANTT. Its circular head allowed precise antisepsis around the catheter, and the sponge head helped to apply gentle friction in back-and-forth strokes to penetrate the skin layers.

Once the new dressing was applied, the NA continued to clean the catheter hub and change the needle-free connector. Finally, the catheter lumen was flushed with 10 ml of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) with a pre-filled saline syringe (BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringe). This involved flushing 1 ml at a time, following a push-pause technique, with positive pressure disconnection to ensure catheter patency. The classification of these syringes as medical devices enables NAs and other nonregistered members of the clinical team to support nursing staff with the care and maintenance of PICCs and other CVCs, within local policies and procedures. Using pre-filled syringes can save time and minimise the risk of contamination of the solution ( Ceylan et al, 2021 ).

The use of pre-filled 0.9% sodium chloride syringes facilitates home maintenance of PICCs for patients. When Andy did not need to attend hospital, his PICC maintenance could be performed by a family member. Patients and relatives could access the necessary equipment and training from the day-case unit or outpatient department. Home PICC maintenance is extremely beneficial, not just to providers, but also to patients, who may avoid unnecessary hospital attendance and so benefit from more quality time at home and a reduced risk of hospital-acquired infections. Many patients and relatives have commented on the convenience of having their PICC maintenance at home and how easy they found using the ChloraPrep™ and BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringe ‘sticks’.

Case study 2 (Gail)

Gail was as a 48-year-old woman being treated for bladder cancer with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLOX). She was admitted for a replacement PICC, primarily for continuous cytotoxic intravenous medication via infusion pump in the homecare setting. Her first PICC developed a reaction thought to be related to a sutureless securement device (SSD) anchoring the PICC. The device was removed, but this resulted in displacement of the PICC and incorrect positioning in the vessel (superior vena cava). Now unsafe, the PICC was removed, awaiting replacement, which resulted in a delayed start for the chemotherapy.

A second PICC placement was attempted by a nurse-led CVC placement team, and a line attempt was made in Gail’s left arm. Skin antisepsis was undertaken using a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution (ChloraPrep™). A BD ChloraPrep ™ 10 ml applicator was selected, using manufacturer’s recommendations, as per best practice guidance for CVC placement ( Loveday et al, 2014 ) and to comply with local policy for the use of ANTT. The BD ChloraPrep™ applicator allowed improved non-touch technique and helped facilitate good key-part and key-site protection, in line with ANTT ( Clare and Rowley, 2021 ).

The inserting clinician failed to successfully position the PICC in Gail’s left arm and moved to try on the right. On the second attempt, Gail noted the use of BD ChloraPrep™ and stated that she was allergic to the product, reporting a severe skin rash and local discomfort. The line placer informed the Gail that she had used BD ChloraPrep™ on the failed first attempt without issue, and she gave her consent to continue the procedure. No skin reaction was noted during or after insertion of the PICC.

BD ChloraPrep™ has a rapid-acting broad-spectrum antiseptic range and ability to keep fighting bacteria for at least 48 hours ( BD, 2021 ). These were tangible benefits during maintenance of the CVC insertion site, in the protection of key sites following dressing change and until subsequent dressing changes. There are reported observations of clinicians not allowing the skin to fully dry and applying a new dressing onto wet skin after removing old dressings and disinfecting the exit site with BD ChloraPrep™. This has been reported to cause skin irritation, which can be mistaken for an allergic reaction and lead the patient to think that they have an allergy to chlorhexidine. In our centre’s general experience, very few true allergic reactions have ever been reported by the insertion team. Improved surveillance might better differentiate between later reported reactions, possibly associated with a delayed response to exposure to BD ChloraPrep ™ at insertion, and local skin irritation caused by incorrect management at some later point during hospitalisation.

Staff training is an important consideration in the safe and correct use of BD ChloraPrep™ products and the correct use of adhesive dressings to avoid irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). It is worth noting that it can be difficult to differentiate between ICD and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Education and training should be multifaceted (such as with training videos and study days), allowing for different ways of learning, and monitored with audit. Local training in the benefits of using BD ChloraPrep™ correctly have been reinforced by adding simple instructions to ANTT procedure guidelines for CVC insertion and maintenance. Education on its own is often limited to a single episode of training, the benefit of using ANTT procedure guidelines is that they are embedded in a programme of audits and periodic competency reassessment. This makes sure that, as an integral part of good practice, skin antisepsis with BD ChloraPrep ™ is consistently and accurately retrained and assessed.

Gail’s case illustrates the importance of correct application of BD ChloraPrep ™ and how good documentation and surveillance are vital in monitoring skin health during the repeated use skindisinfection products. Care should be taken when recording ICD and ACD reactions, and staff should take steps to confirm true allergy versus temporary skin irritation.

Case study 3 (Beata)

Beata was a 13-year-old teenage girl being treated for acute myeloid leukaemia. Although Beata had a dual-lumen skin-tunnelled catheter in situ, a peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC) was required for the administration of contrast media for computed tomography (CT) scanning. However, Beata had needlephobia, and so the lead vascular access nurse was contacted to insert the cannula, following ultrasound guidance and the ANTT. After Beata and her mother gave their consent to the procedure, the nurse gathered and prepared all the equipment, including a cannulation pack, single-use tourniquet, skin-antisepsis product, appropriate cannula, PIVC dressing, 0.9% sodium chloride BD PosiFlush ™ Prefilled Saline Syringe, sterile gel, sterile dressing to cover ultrasound probe and personal protective equipment.

Prior to PIVC insertion, a 4x5 cm area of skin underwent antisepsis with a 1.5 ml BD ChloraPrep ™ Frepp applicator, with back-and-forth strokes for 30 seconds, and was allowed to air-dry. The vascular access team prefer to use BD ChloraPrep ™ Frepp over single-use wipes, as the former is faster acting and provides the right volume to decontaminate the indicated area using ANTT ( Clare and Rowley, 2021 ).

Following insertion, the PIVC was flushed with a 10 ml BD PosiFlush ™ Prefilled Saline Syringe syringe, using a pushpause pulsatile technique, with positive pressure disconnection. Local policy recommends the use of pre-filled saline syringes, as they save time and minimise infection risk compared with manually drawn saline flushes ( Ceylan et al, 2021 ). The Trust also permits competent non-registered members of staff to perform PIVC insertion, which is more cost-effective than depending on registered nurses.

In Beata’s case, the team considered the use of BD ChloraPrep™ and BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringe to be essential for the prevention of VAD-associated infections, as well as increasing the quality of nursing care by saving time in the day-case and inpatient settings alike.

Case study 4 (Emma)

Emma, a 43-year-old woman diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, was scheduled for an allogenic stem-cell transplant and associated chemotherapy. To facilitate this, she attended the vascular access service at University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust for the insertion of a triple-lumen skin-tunnelled catheter. This was identified as the best VAD for her needs, because of its longevity, multiple points of access and decreased infection risk compared with other devices, such as PICCs.

This was Emma’s second advanced VAD insertion, having previously received an apheresis line due to poor peripheral venous access, to facilitate the prior stem-cell harvest. She was yet to receive any treatment, and, therefore, no immunodeficiency had been identified prior to the insertion procedure.

Trust policy for skin disinfection prior to the insertion or removal of PICC lines is a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution, BD ChloraPrep™. There is an exception for patient history of allergy or sensitivity to BD ChloraPrep™, where 10% povidone iodine is used instead. Emma had received BD ChloraPrep™ before, with no sign allergy or sensitivity, and so the vascular access team decided to use this product again for insertion. BD Chloraprep™ was used, in preference of other skin antisepsis options, due to the applicator’s ability to effectively penetrate the layers of the epidermis, as well as the ability to eliminate direct hand-to-skin contact between the operator and patient ( Clare and Rowley, 2021 ).

Insertion of a skin-tunnelled catheter first requires disinfection of a large area, including the neck and upper chest. Following the manufacturer’s coverage recommendations, a 10.5 ml BD ChloraPrep™ applicator was selected as most suitable to cover an area of 25x30 cm ( BD, 2022 a).

The applicator was activated by pinching the wings to allow the antiseptic solution to properly load onto the sponge. To ensure proper release of the solution, the applicator was held on the skin against the anticipated site of insertion until the sponge pad became saturated. Then, a back-and-forth rubbing motion was undertaken for a minimum of 30 seconds, ensuring that the full area to be used was covered. The solution was then left to dry completely, prior to full-body draping, leaving the procedural area exposed for the procedure. Generally, drying time takes from 30 to 60 seconds, but local policy is not restrictive, as allowing the solution to fully dry is of paramount importance ( Gunka et al, 2019 ). BD Chloraprep™ is effective against a wide variety of microorganisms and has a rapid onset of action ( Florman and Nichols, 2007 ). Therefore, it was felt to be the best option for procedural and ongoing care skin asepsis in a patient anticipated to be immunocompromised during treatment.

It is the normal policy of the Trust’s vascular access service to flush VADs using BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringes with 0.9% sodium chloride. Likewise, BD PosiFlush™ Prefilled Saline Syringes Sterile Pathway (SP) are used to prime all VADs prior to insertion and to check for correct patency once inserted. BD PosiFlush ™ Prefilled Saline Syringe were used in preference of other options, such as vials or bags, due to the absence of requirement for a prescription in the local organisation. They are treated as a medical device and, therefore, can be used without prescription. The advantage of this is that flushes can be administered in a nurse-led clinic, where prescribers are not always available. Aside from the logistical advantages, the use of pre-filled syringes reduces the risk of microbial contamination through preparation error and administration error through correct labelling ( National Patient Safety Agency, 2007 ) In Emma’s case, three BD PosiFlush™ SP Prefilled Saline Syringes were used to check patency and/or ascertain venous location following the insertion of the skin-tunnelled catheter.

In this case, both BD ChloraPrep ™ and BD PosiFlush ™ Prefilled Saline Syringe proved simple to use and helped achieve a successful procedural outcome for the patient.

Case study 5 (Frank)

Frank was a 47-year-old man who had been diagnosed with infective endocarditis following a trans-oesophageal echo. A few days later, to facilitate his planned treatment of 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics to be administered 4-hourly every day, he was referred to the vascular access service for insertion of longterm IV access. To facilitate this administration, the decision was made to place a PICC.

Frank’s referral included a history of illegal intravenous drug use and details of the consequent difficulty the ward-based team had in finding suitable veins to obtain vascular access. His medical history also included infected abscesses in the left groin and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation.

First, Frank was administered suppression therapy for MRSA decolonisation. Following this and prior to PICC insertion, the skin antisepsis procedure was undertaken using a 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol solution, BD ChloraPrep™, in adherence to Trust policy ( Loveday et al, 2014 ). Specifically, BD ChloraPrep™ applicators are selected for their single-use application. They have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of infectious complications (catheter colonisation and local infection) by 92% compared with 5% povidone iodine (PVI) 69% ethanol ( Guenezan et al, 2021 ). A 3 ml BD ChloraPrep™ applicator was considered suitable to decontaminate an area sufficient for the intended PICC insertion procedure, as recommended by the manufacturer ( BD, 2022 b). It was applied using a back-and-forth motion for a minimum of 30 seconds and left to fully dry ( Loveday et al, 2014 ). Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia’s have a mortality rate of 20-40% and are predominantly caused by VAD insertion ( Ishikawa and Furukawa, 2021 ), and, therefore, the need to reduce this risk was of particular importance for this patient due to the history of MRSA colonisation.

In Frank’s case, the use of BD ChloraPrep™ during the insertion procedure and for each subsequent dressing change episode participated in an uneventful period of treatment. The clinical challenges posed by the patients’ presentation of MRSA colonisation meant the risk of infection was increased but, through correct antisepsis, no adverse events were noted, and the full course of treatment was successfully administered through the PICC.

Case Study in Nursing: Tips dan Trik Penulisan Contoh Studi Kasus Asuhan Keperawatan

Kupas tuntas cara menuangkan studi kasus dalam asuhan keperawatan sampai menjadi sebuah jurnal yang dapat dipublikasikan bersama Docquity Academy

Gambaran Umum mengenai Kursus Case Study in Nursing

Ikuti pelatihan online "Case Study in Nursing" untuk mempelajari tips dan trik penulisan studi kasus keperawatan yang siap dipublikasikan. Pelajari pengkajian, diagnosis, perencanaan, implementasi, dan evaluasi dalam proses keperawatan. Dapatkan pemahaman mendalam tentang teori keperawatan dan publikasi jurnal.

Siapa saja yang cocok mengikuti kelas ini?

Kelas ini dirancang khusus untuk perawat yang ingin meningkatkan kemampuan mereka dalam menganalisis kasus dan mengambil keputusan yang tepat.

Kursus perawat ini akan membantu Anda dalam penulisan clinical case study dalam keperawatan dalam pendidikan lanjutan Anda. Tidak hanya melalui teori, tapi juga praktek dan interaksi bersama instruktur.

Apa yang akan Anda pelajari?

Modul 1: gambaran umum tentang studi kasus.

Selain mempelajari tentang studi kasus secara umum, Anda juga akan mempelajari lebih dalam tentang clinical case study mulai dari pemilihan sampel hingga penyajian khusus.

Modul 2: Studi Kasus

Anda akan mempelajari bagian-bagian yang ada di artikel case study, termasuk perubahan kondisi pasien dari awal hingga akhir.

Modul 3: Proses Keperawatan

Anda akan mempelajari cara melakukan proses keperawatan, termasuk diagnosa keperawatan, intervensi yang relevan, implementasi ilmu keperawatan, serta bagaimana model keperawatan dapat mendukung studi kasus.

Modul 4: Evaluasi dan Diskusi

Anda akan mempelajari evaluasi proses keperawatan dan cara menyusun pembahasannya, dilengkapi dengan contoh penulisan studi kasus.

Modul 5: Publikasi Studi Kasus

Anda akan mempelajari cara publikasi jurnal case study di platform nasional dan internasional.

Modul 6: Presentasi Peserta

Modul ini memberikan kesempatan bagi peserta untuk mempresentasikan hasil belajar dan praktek dalam menulis clinical case study.

Apa kata mereka tentang Docquity Academy

Sangat baik dan berguna saat saya sedang pendidikan.

Abdullah, S.Kep, NERS

Kenali Instruktur Anda.

Amelia Ganefianty, S.Kep., Ners., M.Kep., Sp.KMB

Sudah menyelami dunia keperawatan sejak tahun 2008. Berbagai macam peran juga sudah dijalani, dari perawat GICU, NCCU, ICU hingga HCU. Tak hanya itu, beliau juga seorang peneliti dan reviewer dengan segudang prestasi dan sudah banyak publikasi jurnal yang beliau terbitkan. Saat ini beliau sedang melanjutkan studi doktoral di Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Ismail Fahmi, S.Kep., Ners., M.Kep., Sp.KMB

Seorang Ners spesialis keperawatan medikal bedah, dosen, peneliti di bidang medikal bedah kekhususan kardiovaskular. Selain itu, Beliau juga seorang instruktur untuk emergency training. Sudah banyak pula prestasi dan publikasi yang diraih, salah satu penghargaan yang telah dicapai adalah Juara III produk inovasi teknologi yang diselenggarakan oleh Kemenkes tahun 2021.

Frequently Asked Questions

• Memilih kasus yang relevan dan menarik.
• Mengumpulkan data secara sistematis.
• Menganalisis dan menginterpretasikan data.
• Membuat diagnosis keperawatan yang akurat.
• Merencanakan intervensi keperawatan yang tepat.
• Menulis studi kasus dengan struktur yang baik.
• Menyertakan refleksi pribadi dan pembelajaran yang diambil.

It seems like this course has ended, sign up below and get notified when we launch the next iteration.

Courses you might be interested in.

Kelas Perawat Entrepreneur: Dari Praktik Mandiri Hingga Klinik Pribadi

• Saharuddin, S.Kep., Ners., M.Kep.
• Maret 11, 2023

Ikuti kelas Perawat Entrepreneur bersama Docquity Academy, dapatkan pelatihan komprehensif dalam mengelola praktik mandiri hingga mendirikan klinik pribadi.

Systematic Review – Meta Analysis (SR-MA) untuk Perawat dan Dokter

• Mega Hasanul Huda, PhD
• Januari 10, 2023

Ikuti kelas online Systematic Review & Meta Analysis (SR-MA) di Docquity Academy yang dirancang khusus untuk perawat, dokter, dan tenaga kesehatan.

Keterampilan Onkologi Dasar: Perawatan Kanker untuk Tenaga Kesehatan

• Deteksi Dini Dharmais
• Januari 2, 2023

Dapatkan keterampilan onkologi dasar bagi dokter umum, mahasiswa FK, dan tenaga kesehatan. Pelajari perawatan kanker kolostomi, trakeostomi, dan pasca operasi.

New Courses

Pain Management for Children & Getting it Right From The Start

Hijack Electrolit: Gangguan Keseimbangan Kalium dan Natrium

Food and Health: How Food Correlates with The Risk of Chronic Disease

Skincare 101: How to Choose The Perfect Skincare for Your Skin

Subscribe for updates on our latest medical courses and teaching opportunities.

© 2023 | Docquity.com. All rights reserved

Share this course

This course is available in multiple countries. please select your country:, sisip/sunting tautan.

Masukkan URL tujuan

Atau pasang tautan ke konten yang ada

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.10(9); 2023 Sep
• PMC10415993

A mixed methods study using case studies prepared by nursing students as a clinical practice evaluation tool

Ana maría palmar‐santos.

1 Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid Spain

2 Member of the Nursing and Health Care Research Group of the Health Research Institute “Puerta de Hierro‐Segovia de Arana” (IDIPHISA), Majadahonda Spain

Cristina Oter‐Quintana

Ricardo olmos.

3 Social Psychology and Methodology Department, Faculty of Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid Spain

Azucena Pedraz‐Marcos

4 Health Care Research Unit, Institute of Health Carlos III; Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain

Juana Robledo‐Martin

5 Member of the Gregorio Marañon Health Research Institute, IiSGM, Madrid Spain

Associated Data

Data available on request from the authors: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

To identify the presence of variability in the evaluation of case studies prepared by nursing students during their primary care rotations based on the existing evaluation rubric. To explore the difficulties experienced by link lecturers and students in preparing and evaluating case studies.

A mixed methods study.

The scores for the rubric items and the final grades for the case studies were collected from a sample of 132 cases. Qualitative information was collected by conducting open‐ended interviews with lecturers and a focus group session with students.

Statistically significant differences were identified between the lecturers' mean final grades [ F (5.136) = 3.984, p  = 0.002] and a variety of items in the evaluation rubric ( p  < 0.05). In addition, effect sizes [ η 2 (≈0.14)] of considerable magnitude were found.

Two themes emerged from the qualitative data: (1). the challenge of preparing the case studies and (2). the variable nature of the evaluations.

1. INTRODUCTION

Clinical training of nursing students is an essential part of the nursing degree curriculum. In the European context, this training is determined by a European Union directive and accounts for ‘at least one half of the minimum duration of the training’. The same directive states that ‘this training shall take place in hospitals and other health institutions and the community, under the responsibility of nursing teachers, in cooperation with and assisted by other qualified nurses’ (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament,  2005 ). Evaluating skills in a real‐life environment with a multitude of different professionals accompanying the students' learning process poses a challenge for institutions training future nursing professionals (Almalkawi et al.,  2018 ; Pramila‐Savukoski et al.,  2020 ).

Evaluating the acquisition of clinical practice skills is an ongoing task for clinical mentors that poses a constant challenge (Tuomikoski et al.,  2020 ). Although clinical mentors have improved the evaluation procedures and rubrics at their disposal (Stanley et al.,  2020 ), they continue to call for greater communication with universities (Bos et al.,  2015 ). At most institutions, this continuous evaluation process is supplemented by reflective evaluation in an attempt to measure not only performance but also the thought processes leading to that performance, that is, critical thinking and decision‐making. Various methods and tools have been used for this purpose, including portfolios (Buckley et al.,  2009 ), reflective journals (Hwang et al.,  2018 ), case scenarios and 360‐degree evaluations (González‐Gil et al., 2020 ) and performance checklist and assessment tests, like in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) (Sabzi et al.,  2018 ). These methods have all proven effective in evaluating nursing students' clinical practice and are considered not only evaluation tools but also learning tools (Driessen,  2017 ).

2. BACKGROUND

Case studies have been widely used in nursing theory training because they help students to build on the basic knowledge taught and to collect information and analyse it to make diagnoses and support interventions (O'Rourke & Zerwic,  2016 ). In addition, there is considerable research on the use of case studies in simulation settings, which are practical environments where students gain confidence before moving on to clinical practice (Wong & Kowitlawakul,  2020 ). Case studies have been included in OSCEs as part of the final evaluation of skills acquired through clinical practice (Kelly et al.,  2016 ) and as tools for learning critical thinking and decision‐making skills in healthcare institutions (Englund,  2020 ). At our university, the students study the nursing process and the standardised nursing languages (North American Nursing Diagnosis Classification (NANDA), Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)) in the first year. In the second and third years, the students are asked to prepare a clinical case consisting in designing a care plan for a person or a family in their clinical practice unit. The students must develop the different phases of the nursing process: assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation of their care plan. They must use the standardised nursing languages too. To guide this process, the student is supervised by a link lecturer, who can be an academic lecturer (full lecturer) or a clinical lecturer (assistant lecturer), who combines their teaching work at the university with clinical activity. The grade obtained in the clinical case is part of the overall evaluation of the clinical practice module, which also includes other components such as being assessed by the clinical nurse responsible for mentoring them at the clinical placement and a self‐evaluation component. This kind of summative assessment with several tools used in direct patient care and simulated practice, which are marked using a multi‐level observational rubric, supplemented by self‐evaluation of clinical performance, is in line with the findings of Clemett and Raleigh ( 2021 ) in their systematic review.

Despite the wide use and positive outcomes gained from cases studies, students still feel that the evaluation of their clinical practice varies depending on the clinical nurse mentor, who decides what is relevant in ‘the real world’ and the link lecturer, who, despite being relatively invisible to students during their clinical practice, has a major influence on their final grade (Foster et al.,  2015 ; Helminen et al.,  2016 ).

3. THE STUDY

The aim of this study is twofold. On the one hand, to identify the presence of variability in the evaluation of case studies prepared by nursing students during their primary care rotations based on a module's existing evaluation rubric. On the other hand, to explore the difficulties experienced by link lecturers and students in preparing and evaluating case studies.

4.1. Design

A mixed methods design was used, analysing the scores given to the case studies during the evaluation and qualitative information on link lecturers' and students' assessments of the evaluation process.

4.2. Population and sample

The study was carried out during the 7‐week rotation of third‐year students on primary care clinical placements during the 2018–2019 academic year. The study population included 132 students, who prepared a case study during their rotation in primary care, and 6 link lecturers, who assessed their case studies. Each case study was evaluated by the link lecturer responsible for monitoring that student during the clinical practices in that period. During the 2018–2019 academic year, evaluation of the primary care case studies was undertaken by six link lecturers.

4.3. Data collection

Data were collected in the following ways: the scores awarded to the 132 case studies by the various link lecturers, a focus group session with the participating students and in‐depth interviews with the lecturers involved in their evaluation.

Data were collected on the following variables: the link lecturer responsible for evaluating each student, the final grade for each student's case and the grades awarded to each of the items in the evaluation rubric. This rubric (see Annex  1 ) is the tool usually used by link lecturers to correct clinical cases. This evaluation tool was developed by a group of nursing professors with extensive experience in the preparation of clinical cases but has not been subjected to a formal validation process.

Four of the six link lecturers were interviewed since two of the link lecturers had participated in the development of the research project and their participation in the interviews was not considered appropriate. Of the four link lecturers interviewed: one was an academic lecturer (full lecturer) and three were clinical lecturers (who combine clinical care with teaching). An interview script covering the following topics was used: experience in evaluating case studies; the influence of the aspects they value most and least on the grades they award; difficulties in using the rubric and recommendations for improvement (see Annex  2 ). The interviews lasted between 40 and 60 min and took place in a space chosen by each participant. They were audio‐recorded and then transcribed for analysis.

Students with the highest and lowest grades in the case study were invited to participate in a focus group session. To ensure the heterogeneity of the group, students evaluated by different link lecturers were represented. For the focus group session, a thematic script was created, addressing aspects relating to the preparation of students' case studies during their clinical placements and recommendations for improvement (see Annex  3 ). Five students participated in the focus group, which was led by a moderator accompanied by an observer who took notes during the development of the session. All students actively participated in the discussion. The focus group session lasted 90 min and was audio‐recorded and transcribed for subsequent analysis, after obtaining informed consent from all participants.

4.4. Data analysis

The data from the case study evaluation were statistically analysed to assess any differences between link lecturers in the final grade they awarded to each case study and the grades they awarded to each of the items in the evaluation rubric. To analyse the data, a between‐subjects one‐factor ANOVA model was used (one lecturer representing one factor) using the total score given by the lecturer (the sum of all the rubric items) and each rubric item separately as the dependent variable. This was used to assess whether the average scores differed. Pairwise comparisons of lecturers were performed to establish whether lecturers differed in the average scores awarded using Tukey's method (controlling for the type I error rate). The statistical significance threshold for all analyses was set at 0.05. In addition, the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were fulfilled for the dependent variables. Normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The assumption of homoscedasticity was assessed using Levene's test. When the assumption of the equality of variances was not met, Welch's corrected F ‐statistic was used. The non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was also used to analyse whether the results were sensitive to the statistical model. The data were analysed using SPSS (version 25) software from IBM.

The qualitative data from the interviews and focus group sessions were analysed thematically using Braun and Clarke method ( 2006 ). All authors read and underlined the interview and focus group transcripts to familiarise themselves with the data and to identify the first emerging codes. At a series of analytical meetings, the authors identified potential themes by clustering the codes and created a relationship map to refine and link the themes found. This refinement of the themes led to the final report, which included quotes from participants and analytical notes on each theme.

4.5. Ethical considerations

This study is part of a teaching innovation project entitled ‘Strategies for harmonising clinical practice evaluation standards’, approved by the Autonomous University of Madrid Teaching Innovation Ethical Committee, involving internal and external evaluators, with reference number M_015.18_INN.

All individuals involved in the study participated voluntarily, were informed about the study objectives and signed an informed consent form. Students were assured that their participation would have no impact on their grades. To this end, double anonymisation was carried out at the time of recruitment and during transcription.

A total of 132 case study evaluations were collected from 6 lecturers, with the number of cases evaluated by each lecturer ranging between 18 and 26 (see Table  1 ).

Means, standard deviations and number of students ( N ) per lecturer based on final grades and rubric items.

Table  2 shows the results comparing the means of the six lecturers. The results of the parametric ANOVA model and the non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis model are also provided, with a sensitivity analysis performed in consideration of the fact that the assumptions required by the ANOVA are not always met. The results suggest that the two statistical models are robust and consistent with one another. In virtually all items of the rubric (in addition to the final grade), there are statistically significant differences in the mean grades awarded between the lecturers. The items in which significant differences were identified between the lecturers using both statistical models were information analysis, planning, follow‐up of the individual's progress and written communication. In the final assessment and literature review, differences were detected only in the non‐parametric test. Furthermore, in the final grade, the effect size measure, η 2 , exhibited a considerable magnitude according to Cohen's criteria ( 1988 , ps. 280–287), where 0.01, 0.07 and 0.14 are set as criteria for weak, moderate and strong effect sizes respectively. Table  2 shows that in four of the eight items evaluated, the effect size was high.

Significance of ANOVA tests based on final grades and rubric items.

Note: Bold values indicate the statistical significance of p < 0.05.

Pairwise comparisons between all lecturers were also assessed and one lecturer was found to differ significantly from two other lecturers ( p  < 0.05). Lecturer 6, in particular, awarded significantly higher averages than lecturers 1 and 4 (see Table  1 ). Finally, the six lecturers were grouped into two categories according to their job category (academic lecturer or clinical lecturer) in order to analyse whether academic and clinical lecturers used the rubric differently. The T ‐test for independent samples was used to compare the averages. The results showed no significant differences in any of the items analysed or in the total, except for written communication. In this item, the group of academic lecturers ( M  = 0.38, SD = 0.12) awarded significantly lower average scores than the group of clinical lecturers ( M  = 0.47, SD = 0.06): T (93) = 5.281, p  < 0.001.

Regarding the qualitative phase of the study, the thematic analysis of the discourses from the interviews with the link lecturers and the focus group with the students generated two core categories:

• The challenge of preparing the case study
• The variable nature of the evaluations

5.1. The challenge of preparing the case study

The link lecturers participating in the study viewed case studies as an opportunity to integrate theory and practice. However, they highlighted students' difficulties in incorporating theory into the case they are working on. They also pointed out that students tended to focus their attention on the physical problems of the people they care for. They stressed that a reductionist, superficial nursing assessment will not lead to a deep understanding of the social and emotional problems of the individual under their care.

The link lecturers participating in the study explained that the limitations of the case study were due, on the one hand, to the incorporation of the nursing process into the computer system, which simplifies the approach of a comprehensive vision of said process, and on the other hand, to the internalisation of care models that fail to take a holistic view of the individual by nursing students during their placements.

So, I think that this may be influencing a lot […] that they are influenced a lot by the computer systems, which, in some way, shape how you think, or your own mentalization. But, sometimes, what I am seeing is that there are students who do not go further. (E1)

(They are preparing) a case with a mentor, who almost always has a hospital background, who is not teaching them a holistic approach to patients. (E4)

During the focus group, the students stated that the clinical nurse mentors helped them in choosing a patient and support them in preparing their case. However, they pointed out that sometimes the clinical nurse mentors failed to fully understand the work they must carry out, even questioning the practicality of this type of exercise for their future professional practice.

I've even heard that. They [clinical nurse mentors] say “but this is a waste of time, you're never going to do this…” If the person who is above you, so to speak, comes to you and says: “don't do that, it's nonsense” or “it's no use”, they're not exactly going to be of much help. (FG)

In the focus group, the students identified the lack of precise, uniform instructions from all link lecturers as to the structure and basic contents of the case study as one of the main difficulties involved in the process. This prompts them to prioritise the creation of their own case study, ‘the model case study’, for which they resort to the following: 1. reviewing learning materials from previous modules in their academic training; 2. using available bibliographic resources; and 3. compiling case studies carried out by colleagues or by themselves that have already been corrected. The students expressed that they felt that some of the instructions provided by link lecturers were contradictory and wondered whether those instructions reflect personal inclinations rather than academic criteria.

The link lecturers who participated in the study also pointed to the lack of a precise, standardised structure and content as particularly problematic when it came to helping them guide the student in the development of the clinical case. They considered that the fact that the students could receive different indications from each link lecturer contributed to generating confusion among them.

Yes, I see the fact that you can have a tutor every year as an inconvenience, […]each tutor asks you really one thing. Maybe it's not worth it, even if it's well done, it's not worth it, because they wants… "No, I don't want this, I want you to develop this pattern more for me", "I don't like this, remove it" , and then, suddenly, the following year, or in the following practice, you get another one, and it's the other way around, they likes what you had done at the beginning better. (FG)

I really don't think the problem is that students aren't trying hard enough, it's that they're quite disoriented. We're giving them different instructions if you like. (E2)

During the focus group, the students complained that case studies were expected to meet certain requirements without considering the reality in which they carry out their clinical placements, such as requiring the case study to be carried out in a home environment or demanding that the care plan designed to be put into practice. This last point is also noted by the interviewed link lecturers.

The students and link lecturers mentioned that they sometimes resorted to ‘embellishing’ the real case study with fictitious content as a way of fulfilling the requirements, or to taking more simplistic approaches enabling them to obtain results in the short term.

I understand that the student may have difficulty understanding that we propose a care plan, and an evaluation, above all […], but the evaluation is very difficult, an evaluation in three weeks [the duration of the internship], in primary care. It is that sometimes not even in three weeks is a wound managed, nor is a therapeutic eating plan managed, nor is a grieving coping plan managed, nor do you manage… it is that practically very little. (E4)

But to comply with all the requirements, I think that I personally, in some cases, and I think other people too, end up having to make something up in the end. And just for that, for a good grade, when in reality it's not entirely true. (FG)

5.2. The variable nature of the evaluations

Despite the evaluation rubric, the students participating in the focus group perceived differences in the demands made by different link lecturers. They believed that there was variability in the grading of the cases that was intrinsic to the lecturers themselves and did not reflect the quality of their work. Students felt evaluation discrepancies as ‘unfair’, indicating the need to establish common, precise standards in line with the level of skills to be acquired.

Really, I've had classmates whose cases would have been graded a 9 (by the mentors that I've had), but if I'd handed over my case to their mentor, my case would've got a 5 instead of an 8. That's unacceptable. (FG)

Link lecturers participating in the study viewed the rubric as an instrument that could sometimes ‘constrict’ the evaluation process by requiring a separate grade for each item, overlooking the fact that the final grade was based on the overall quality of the student's work rather than on the sum of the individual parts of the rubric.

The rubric (…) was a bit constricting, I mean, it didn't allow me (…) to be consistent with my impressions after evaluating the student and after adjusting the items to the main dimensions of the rubric. (E2)

The link lecturers reported that the tool displays a central tendency in grades, causing difficulties in the evaluation of the case studies when it comes to minimum and maximum grades. They also believed that there were items in the rubric that needed to be changed and that, in order to reduce variability, certain adjectives should be more specific, for example, ‘complete’, ‘consistent’ and ‘appropriate’. They argued that the fact that not all link lecturers were experts in nursing methodology, and evaluation strategies resulted in the rubric not being used properly or in each link lecturer using it ‘in their own way’ in the evaluation process.

Each of us evaluators evaluate in a different way, from a different perspective. I think we try to do it in the same way, but we end up doing it in a different way. We all have different professional experience, or different academic experience (…). Each one of us might add a different nuance to it. (E3)

Link lecturers also mentioned that students failed to take on board their recommendations for improvement, partly due to discrepancies as to what was considered relevant in each case study.

6. DISCUSSION

The results of our study suggest that, despite the availability of a rubric for evaluating case studies, there are statistically significant differences in the mean grades given by the sample of lecturers. This echoes the findings of previous studies suggesting that, although the availability of rubrics reduces between‐lecturer variability, rubrics fail to eliminate all differences attributable to lecturer idiosyncrasies (Bearman & Ajjawi,  2021 ).

The benefits of using rubrics include the possibility of directing students' efforts towards core aspects of learning. When teachers' expectations are made explicit to students, they are more likely to be met (Panadero & Jonsson,  2013 ). No mention was made of the utility of the rubric as a ‘guide’ for the learning process by the participating students. Rubrics have been justified in academia as a way of ensuring transparency in evaluation. However, without student participation in their development and use, they provide little support for student learning and evaluation (Bearman & Ajjawi,  2021 ; Kilgour et al.,  2020 ).

Case studies have been incorporated into nursing degrees as a tool for learning to apply critical reasoning to nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions. Most of the experiences reported refer to the use of case studies designed by teachers and incorporated into clinical practice by students (Popil,  2011 ) or in comparison with other methods, such as simulated patients (Karadag et al.,  2016 ). Several studies analysing the development of care plans by students based on real patients highlight the importance of nursing taxonomies (NANDA, NIC and NOC) in incorporating evaluation criteria into the case study objectives and improving nursing interventions of a less technical nature (Palese et al.,  2009 ). However, as in our study, students report that nurses working at the healthcare facilities where they are carrying out their clinical placements make marginal use of the nursing methodology. Link lecturers also highlight the biological approach occasionally permeating case studies. Echoing these findings, Türk et al. ( 2013 ) explain the significant presence of physiological diagnoses in care plans made by students based on Benner's Novice to Expert Model. To these authors, the fact that ‘novices’ tend to identify problems of a biological nature results from their limited capacity to understand the situation of the individual being cared for as a whole, to apply critical thinking and to take a holistic approach. It is expected that novices will develop these skills with experience as they become experts. At the same time, identification of psychosocial problems requires a level of communication skill that is not available to students in the early stages of their training.

In our study, students and link lecturers both said that the case study script lacked clarity and specificity. In this sense, students and mentors said that having a follow‐up structure, with specific tasks relating to the preparation of the case study, could be a viable avenue for improvement. This is consistent with a study by Brugnolli et al. ( 2011 ), where students reported that gradual, experiential and guided learning was the most appropriate mentoring tool for their learning process. Palese et al. ( 2008 ) found that students who had received more intensive mentoring in the development of critical thinking skills made fewer errors in the initial formulation of hypotheses in case studies.

Furthermore, in a review by Flott and Linden ( 2016 ), the interaction between mentors and students in clinical practice learning, along with the physical space where learning takes place and the organisational culture, were considered essential components of the clinical learning environment (CLE). Student ‘exposure’ to clinical practice conditions echoes existing findings in the literature regarding the gap between theory and practice. Solutions include greater involvement of link lecturers in the acquisition of clinical skills and experimentation with the realities of practice, as well as a greater presence of clinical mentors in theory training, allowing them to build more meaningful bonds with students (Masterson et al.,  2020 ). This is especially relevant in primary care, where the gap between the hospital setting and the academic environment has been highlighted by various authors (Peters et al.,  2015 ; Valaitis et al.,  2020 ).

Finally, in our study, students and link lecturers feel that they are expected to produce work in accordance with requirements that are far removed from the reality of care. The theory taught at educational institutions aims to provide general practice guidelines that may be meaningless when they materialise in the dynamic, changing world of clinical care, causing feelings of frustration and futility (Salifu et al.,  2019 ).

6.1. Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, for the exploration of the difficulties expressed by the students, only one focus group was conducted with nursing students. This affects the possibility that different student profiles could be represented within the group. Nevertheless, an attempt was made to ensure a certain heterogeneity of the attendees in terms of experiential characteristics considered relevant to the phenomenon under study, such as grades obtained in the clinical case and specific primary health centre of clinical practice. Another limitation of the study is the number of cases evaluated by each teacher, which made it necessary to use non‐parametric tests. It should also be noted that the participants were recruited from a single university institution. This limits transferability to other academic contexts. On the other hand, it should be noted that the rubric used in the elaboration of the clinical cases was developed by a group of expert teachers in this teaching methodology, and has not been subjected to a formal validation process. This prevents knowing the reliability and validity of the instrument to evaluate the clinical cases prepared by the student.

7. CONCLUSION

The use of case studies based on real individuals cared for by students during their practical training as an evaluation tool poses several challenges. Students and link lecturers point out the complexity of the process of preparing a case study and consider that having uniform, clear criteria in line with the reality of clinical settings is essential to facilitate this task. The use of case studies as an evaluation tool requires the availability of rubrics that concisely reflect lecturers' expectations as to the work to be carried out, which can be used by students as a roadmap in preparing their case study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Acknowledgements.

This study is part of a teaching innovation project entitled ‘Strategies for harmonising clinical practice evaluation standards’, approved by the Autonomous University of Madrid Teaching Innovation Ethical Committee, involving internal and external evaluators, with reference number M_015.18_INN. We would like to thank the students and link lecturers for their collaboration in the study.

Rubric for evaluating case studies.

Interview guide for link lecturers., focus group guide..

Palmar‐Santos, A. M. , Oter‐Quintana, C. , Olmos, R. , Pedraz‐Marcos, A. , & Robledo‐Martin, J. (2023). A mixed methods study using case studies prepared by nursing students as a clinical practice evaluation tool . Nursing Open , 10 , 6592–6601. 10.1002/nop2.1919 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

• Almalkawi, I. , Jester, R. , & Terry, L. (2018). Exploring mentors' interpretation of terminology and levels of competence when assessing nursing students: An integrative review . Nurse Education Today , 69 , 95–103. 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.003 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bearman, M. , & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria . Studies in Higher Education , 46 , 359–368. 10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Bos, E. , Silén, C. , & Kaila, P. (2015). Clinical supervision in primary health care; experiences of district nurses as clinical supervisors – a qualitative study . BMC Nursing , 14 , 39. 10.1186/s12912-015-0089-3 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology . Qualitative Research in Psychology , 3 ( 2 ), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Brugnolli, A. , Perli, S. , Viviani, D. , & Saiani, L. (2011). Nursing students' perceptions of tutorial strategies during clinical learning instruction: A descriptive study . Nurse Education Today , 31 ( 2 ), 152–156. 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.008 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Buckley, S. , Coleman, J. , Davison, I. , Khan, K. S. , Zamora, J. , Malick, S. , Morley, D. , Pollard, D. , Ashcroft, T. , Popovic, C. , & Sayers, J. (2009). The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A best evidence medical education (BEME) systematic review. BEME guide No. 11 . Medical Teacher , 31 ( 4 ), 282–298. 10.1080/0142159090288989 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Clemett, V. J. , & Raleigh, M. (2021). The validity and reliability of clinical judgement and decision‐making skills assessment in nursing: A systematic literature review . Nurse Education Today , 102 , 104885. 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104885 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd ed.). LEA. [ Google Scholar ]
• Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament . (2005). And of the Council of 7 September . On the recognition of professional qualifications. Official Journal of the European Union, 22–142.
• Driessen, G. (2017). The validity of educational disadvantage policy indicators . Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research , 12 ( 2 ), 93–110. [ Google Scholar ]
• Englund, H. (2020). Using unfolding case studies to develop critical thinking skills in baccalaureate nursing students: A pilot study . Nurse Education Today , 93 , 104542. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104542 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Flott, E. A. , & Linden, L. (2016). The clinical learning environment in nursing education: A concept analysis . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 72 ( 3 ), 501–513. 10.1111/jan.12861 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Foster, H. , Ooms, A. , & Marks‐Maran, D. (2015). Nursing students' expectations and experiences of mentorship . Nurse Education Today , 35 ( 1 ), 18–24. 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.019 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• González‐Gil, M. T. , Parro‐Moreno, A. I. , Oter‐Quintana, C. , González‐Blázquez, C. , Martínez‐Marcos, M. , Casillas‐Santana, M. , Arlandis‐Casanova, A. , & Canalejas‐Pérez, C. (2020). 360‐degree evaluation: Towards a comprehensive, integrated assessment of performance on clinical placement in nursing degrees: A descriptive observational study . Nurse Education Today , 95 , 104594. 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104594 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Helminen, K. , Coco, K. , Johnson, M. , Turunen, H. , & Tossavainen, K. (2016). Summative assessment of clinical practice of student nurses: A review of the literature . International Journal of Nursing Studies , 53 , 308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.014 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hwang, B. , Choi, H. , Kim, S. , Kim, S. , Ko, H. , & Kim, J. (2018). Facilitating student learning with critical reflective journaling in psychiatric mental health nursing clinical education: A qualitative study . Nurse Education Today , 69 , 159–164. 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.015 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Karadag, M. , Calıskan, N. , & Iseri, O. (2016). Effects of case studies and simulated patients on Students' nursing care plan . International Journal of Nursing Knowledge , 27 ( 2 ), 87–94. 10.1111/2047-3095.12080 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kelly, M. A. , Mitchell, M. L. , Henderson, A. , Jeffrey, C. A. , Groves, M. , Nulty, D. D. , Glover, P. , & Knight, S. (2016). OSCE best practice guidelines‐applicability for nursing simulations . Advances in Simulation (London, England) , 1 , 10. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0014-1 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Kilgour, P. , Northcote, M. , Williams, A. , & Kilgour, A. (2020). A plan for the co‐construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 45 ( 1 ), 140–153. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Masterson, A. , Lee, G. , Khan, E. , Titchener, K. , Doyle‐Blunden, J. , Metcalfe, A. , Tee, S. , & Bliss, J. (2020). Redefining the role of the nurse academic in practice: A pilot study . Nurse Education in Practice , 44 , 102750. 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102750 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• O'Rourke, J. , & Zerwic, J. (2016). Measure of clinical decision‐making abilities of nurse practitioner students . The Journal of Nursing Education , 55 ( 1 ), 18–23. 10.3928/01484834-20151214-06 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Palese, A. , De Silvestre, D. , Valoppi, G. , & Tomietto, M. (2009). A 10‐year retrospective study of teaching nursing diagnosis to baccalaureate students in Italy . International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications : The Official Journal of NANDA International , 20 ( 2 ), 64–75. 10.1111/j.1744-618X.2009.01117.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Palese, A. , Saiani, L. , Brugnolli, A. , & Regattin, L. (2008). The impact of tutorial strategies on student nurses' accuracy in diagnostic reasoning in different educational settings: A double pragmatic trial in Italy . International Journal of Nursing Studies , 45 ( 9 ), 1285–1298. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.10.003 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Panadero, E. , & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review . Educational Research Review , 9 , 129–144. 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Peters, K. , McInnes, S. , & Halcomb, E. (2015). Nursing students' experiences of clinical placement in community settings: A qualitative study . Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia) , 22 ( 2 ), 175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2015.03.001 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Popil, I. (2011). Promotion of critical thinking by using case studies as teaching method . Nurse Education Today , 31 , 204–207. 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.002 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pramila‐Savukoski, S. , Juntunen, J. , Tuomikoski, A. M. , Kääriäinen, M. , Tomietto, M. , Kaučič, B. M. , Filej, B. , Riklikiene, O. , Vizcaya‐Moreno, M. F. , Perez‐Cañaveras, R. M. , De Raeve, P. , & Mikkonen, K. (2020). Mentors' self‐assessed competence in mentoring nursing students in clinical practice: A systematic review of quantitative studies . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 29 ( 5–6 ), 684–705. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15127 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Sabzi, Z. , Modanloo, M. , Yazdi, K. , Kolagari, S. , & Aryaie, M. (2018). The validity and reliability of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pre‐internship nursing students . Journal of Research Development in Nursing and Midwifery , 15 ( 1 ), 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Salifu, D. A. , Gross, J. , Salifu, M. A. , & Ninnoni, J. P. K. (2019). Experiences and perceptions of the theory‐practice gap in nursing in a resource‐constrained setting: A qualitative description study . Nursing Open , 6 , 72–83. 10.1002/nop2.188 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Stanley, D. , Coman, S. , Murdoch, D. , & Stanley, K. (2020). Writing exceptional (specific, student and criterion‐focused) rubrics for nursing studies . Nurse Education in Practice , 49 , 102851. 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.10285 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Tuomikoski, A. M. , Ruotsalainen, H. , Mikkonen, K. , & Kääriäinen, M. (2020). Nurses' experiences of their competence at mentoring nursing students during clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies . Nurse Education Today , 85 , 104258. 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104258 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Türk, G. , Tuğrul, E. , & Sahbaz, M. (2013). Determination of nursing diagnoses used by students in the first clinical practice . International Journal of Nursing Knowledge , 24 ( 3 ), 129–133. 10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01243.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Valaitis, R. , Gaber, J. , Waters, H. , Lamarche, L. , Oliver, D. , Parascandalo, F. , Schofield, R. , & Dolovich, L. (2020). Health TAPESTRY: Exploring the potential of a nursing student placement within a primary care intervention for community‐dwelling older adults . SAGE Open Nursing , 6 , 2377960820909672. 10.1177/2377960820909672 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wong, S. H. V. , & Kowitlawakul, Y. (2020). Exploring perceptions and barriers in developing critical thinking and clinical reasoning of nursing students: A qualitative study . Nurse Education Today , 95 , 104600. 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104600 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

15 Excellent SBAR Nursing Examples + How to Effectively Use SBAR in Nursing

Of all the skills nurses develop, communication is the most essential. We use communication to find out what concerns a patient and to relay our thoughts, opinions, and observations to other nurses, peers, and doctors. Communication may be verbal or nonverbal. Nurses must learn communication techniques and use them effectively. A common communication technique used in nursing today is called SBAR. Perhaps you have heard of this type of communication. Maybe you have not and are asking yourself, "What is SBAR in nursing?” In this article, you will learn what SBAR communication is, why it is important, and find 15 excellent SBAR nursing examples + how to effectively use SBAR in nursing.

What Does SBAR Stand For?

What exactly is sbar in nursing, when was sbar communication first introduced in nursing, when do nurses use the sbar communication technique in nursing, 7 reasons why sbar communication is so important in nursing, what is the difference between sbar and other forms of communication techniques in nursing, • check-back, what are the 5 main skills nurses require to use sbar in nursing, 1. observation:, 2. critical thinking:, 3. decision-making:, 4. interpersonal skills:, 5. excellent communication:, what are the 4 steps involved in sbar nursing communication, 1. situation:, 2. background:, 3. assessment:, 4. recommendation:, 6 things every nurse must do before beginning an sbar conversation, 1. assess the patient:, 2. verify current orders for the patient’s care:, 3. verify important information:, 4. organize your thoughts:, 5. have ready access to the patient’s chart or electronic health record:, 6. think like a doctor (sort of):, what are some examples of nurse-to-physician sbar communication in nursing, what are some examples of nurse-to-nurse sbar communication in nursing, what are some examples of nurse-to-healthcare provider sbar communication in nursing, 5 most common challenges nurses face when using sbar in nursing and how to overcome them, challenge #1: sbar in nursing is sometimes a difficult concept to learn and apply, about the challenge:, how to overcome:, challenge #2: sometimes, the amount of information given seems lacking, challenge #3: some nurses are apprehensive about giving recommendations to doctors, challenge #4: the culture within the healthcare field sometimes resists change, challenge #5: sbar communication usually occurs absent the patient’s presence, bonus 5 expert tips to effectively use sbar in nursing, 1. follow each step of the sbar technique., 2. get organized., 3. relay relevant information., 4. give the other person time to ask follow-up questions., 5. work with the team member you are reporting to so you can develop a suitable plan of action., my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. is sbar in nursing a verbal or written communication tool, 2. are all types of nurses required to use the sbar technique in nursing, 3. is sbar a standard format in nurse and physician communication, 4. what information should nurses include when using sbar, 5. is sbar evidence-based, 6. what is the difference between sbar and soap, 7. is sbar a progress note, 8. how do you write a good sbar nursing note, 9. do nurses have difficulty using sbar, 10. do nursing schools teach sbar, 11. does sbar assist nurses to think critically, 12. how does nursing sbar improve patient safety, 13. how do i differentiate between background and assessment in an sbar, 14. what if i don’t have a recommendation when using the sabr tool, 15. can my recommendation upset the physician, 16. how to use sbar in a nursing home, 17. how to track which nurse is using sbar in hand-off, 18. what is i-sbar-r and how is it different from sbar in nursing, 19. is it okay not to use sbar in nursing, 20. does nursing sbar really work, 21. how to use sbar in nursing non-clinically.

Finished Papers

Bennie Hawra

Emilie Nilsson

Finished Papers

Customer Reviews

How to Order Our Online Writing Services.

There is nothing easier than using our essay writer service. Here is how everything works at :

• You fill out an order form. Make sure to provide us with all the details. If you have any comments or additional files, upload them. This will help your writer produce the paper that will exactly meet your needs.
• You pay for the order with our secure payment system.
• Once we receive the payment confirmation, we assign an appropriate writer to work on your project. You can track the order's progress in real-time through the personal panel. Also, there is an option to communicate with your writer, share additional files, and clarify all the details.
• As soon as the paper is done, you receive a notification. Now, you can read its preview version carefully in your account. If you are satisfied with our professional essay writing services, you confirm the order and download the final version of the document to your computer. If, however, you consider that any alterations are needed, you can always request a free revision. All our clients can use free revisions within 14 days after delivery. Please note that the author will revise your paper for free only if the initial requirements for the paper remain unchanged. If the revision is not applicable, we will unconditionally refund your account. However, our failure is very unlikely since almost all of our orders are completed issue-free and we have 98% satisfied clients.

As you can see, you can always turn to us with a request "Write essay for me" and we will do it. We will deliver a paper of top quality written by an expert in your field of study without delays. Furthermore, we will do it for an affordable price because we know that students are always looking for cheap services. Yes, you can write the paper yourself but your time and nerves are worth more!

Don’t Drown In Assignments — Hire an Essay Writer to Help!

Does a pile of essay writing prevent you from sleeping at night? We know the feeling. But we also know how to help it. Whenever you have an assignment coming your way, shoot our 24/7 support a message or fill in the quick 10-minute request form on our site. Our essay help exists to make your life stress-free, while still having a 4.0 GPA. When you pay for an essay, you pay not only for high-quality work but for a smooth experience. Our bonuses are what keep our clients coming back for more. Receive a free originality report, have direct contact with your writer, have our 24/7 support team by your side, and have the privilege to receive as many revisions as required.

We have the ultimate collection of writers in our portfolio, so once you ask us to write my essay, we can find you the most fitting one according to your topic. The perks of having highly qualified writers don't end there. We are able to help each and every client coming our way as we have specialists to take on the easiest and the hardest tasks. Whatever essay writing you need help with, let it be astronomy or geography, we got you covered! If you have a hard time selecting your writer, contact our friendly 24/7 support team and they will find you the most suitable one. Once your writer begins the work, we strongly suggest you stay in touch with them through a personal encrypted chat to make any clarifications or edits on the go. Even if miscommunications do happen and you aren't satisfied with the initial work, we can make endless revisions and present you with more drafts ASAP. Payment-free of course. Another reason why working with us will benefit your academic growth is our extensive set of bonuses. We offer a free originality report, title, and reference page, along with the previously mentioned limitless revisions.