Principles of Research Design
Cite this chapter.
121 Accesses
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
- Available as PDF
- Read on any device
- Instant download
- Own it forever
- Available as EPUB and PDF
- Compact, lightweight edition
- Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
- Free shipping worldwide - see info
- Durable hardcover edition
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Carter, K.C. (1985). Koch’s postulates in relation to the work of Jacob Henle and Edwin Klebs. Medical History , 29 , 353–374, 356–357.
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Checkoway, H., & Demers, D.A. (1994). Occupational case—control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 151–162.
Comstock, G.W. (1994). Evaluating vaccination effectiveness and vaccine efficacy by means of case-control studies. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 77–89.
Copeland, K.T., Checkoway, H., McMichael, A.J., & Holbrook, R.H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. American Journal of Epidemiology , 105 , 488–495.
Coughlin, S.S. (1990). Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 43 , 87–91.
Dwyer, D.M., Strickler, H., Goodman, R.A., & Armenian, H.K. (1994). Use of case-control studies in outbreak investigations. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 109–123.
Farrar, W.B. (1991). Clinical trials: Access and reimbursement. Cancer , 67 , 1779–1782.
Feldman, F., Finch, M., & Dowd, B. (1989). The role of health practices in HMO selection bias: A confirmatory study. Inquiry , 26 , 381–387.
Felson, D.T. (1992). Bias in meta-analytic research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 45 , 885–892.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gore, S.M. (1981). Assessing clinical trials—why randomise? British Medical Journal , 282 , 1958–1960.
Gray-Donald, K., & Kramer, M.S. (1988). Causality inference in observational vs. experimental studies: An empirical comparison, American Journal of Epidemiology , 127 , 885–892.
Greenland, S. (1977). Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology , 106 , 184–187.
Greenland, S., & Robins, J.M. (1985). Confounding and misclassification. American Journal of Epidemiology , 122 , 495–506.
Hammond, E.C., Selikoff, I.J., & Seidman, H. (1979). Asbestos exposure, cigarette smoking, and death rates. Annals of the New York Academy of Science , 330 , 473–490.
CAS Google Scholar
Hill, A.B. (1965). The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine , 58 , 295–300.
Hills, M., & Armitage, P. (1979). The two-period cross-over clinical trial. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology , 8 , 7–20.
Jooste, P.L., Yach, D., Steenkamp, H.J., Botha, J.L., & Rossouw, J.E. (1990). Drop-out and newcomer bias in a community cardiovascular follow-up study. International Journal of Epidemiology , 19 , 284–289.
Kalton, G. (1993). Sampling considerations in research on HIV risk and illness. In D.G. Ostrow & R.C. Kessler (Eds.), Methodological Issues in AIDS Behavioral Research (pp. 53–74). New York: Plenum Press.
Google Scholar
Kelsey, J.L., Thompson, W.D., & Evans, A.S. (1986). Methods in Observational Epidemiology . New York: Oxford University Press.
Khlat, M. (1994). Use of case-control methods for indirect estimation in demography. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 124–133.
Khoury, M.J., & Beaty, T.H. (1994). Applications of the case-control method in genetic epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 134–150.
Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., & Morgenstern, M. (1982). Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lasky, T., & Stolley, P.D. (1994). Selection of cases and controls. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 6–17.
Last, J.M., (Ed.). (1988). A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Liberati, A. (1995). “Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century”: Discussion. A plea for a more balanced view of meta-analysis and systematic overviews of the effect of health care interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 48 , 81–86.
Lubin, J.H., & Gail, M.H. (1984). Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics , 40 , 63–75.
Mastroianni, A.C., Faden, R., & Federman, D. (Ed.s). (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies , vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Miettinen, O.S. (1985). The case-control study: Valid selection of subjects. Journal of Chronic Disease , 38 , 543–548.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Morabia, A. (1991). On the origin of Hill’s causal criteria. Epidemiology , 2 , 367–369.
Morgenstern, H. (1996, Spring). Course Materials, Part II: Class Notes for Epidemiologic Methods II, Epidemiology 201B , 54–82.
Morgenstern, H. (1982). Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health , 72 , 1336–1344.
O’Brien, P.C., & Shampo, M.A. (1988). Statistical considerations for performing multiple tests in a single experiment. 5. Comparing two therapies with respect to several endpoints. Mayo Clinic Proceedings , 63 , 1140–1143.
Olkin, I. (1995). Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis, quoting the National Library of Medicine. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 48 , 133–146.
Rosner, F. (1987). The ethics of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Medicine , 82 , 283–290.
Rothman, K.J. (1976). Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology , 104 , 587–592.
Rothman, K.J. (1986). Modern Epidemiology . Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Sackett, D.L. (1979). Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases , 32 , 51–63.
Sartwell, P.E. (1960). On the methodology of investigations of etiologic factors in chronic disease—further comments. Journal of Chronic Disease , 11 , 61–63.
Schlesselman, J.J. (1982). Case Control Studies . New York: Oxford University Press.
Selby, J.V. (1994). Case-control evaluations of treatment and program efficacy. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 90–101.
Senn, S.J. (1991). Falsification and clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine , 10 , 1679–1692.
Smith, P.G. (1983). Issues in the design of case-control studies: Matching and interaction effects. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Gezondheidszorg , 61 , 755–760.
Sterling, T.D., Weinkam, J.J., & Weinkam, J.L. (1990). The sick person effect. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 43 , 141–151.
Susser, M. (1991). What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology , 133 , 635–648.
Wacholder, S., Silverman, D.T., McLaughlin, J.K., & Mandel, J.S. (1992). Selection of controls in case-control studies. III. Design options. American Journal of Epidemiology , 135 , 1042–1050.
Weed, D.L. (1986). On the logic of causal inference. American Journal of Epidemiology , 123 , 965–979.
Weiss, N.S. (1994). Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. Epidemiologic Reviews , 16 , 102–108.
Download references
Rights and permissions
Reprints and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
(2002). Principles of Research Design. In: Gender, Ethnicity, and Health Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47569-3_3
Download citation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47569-3_3
Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN : 978-0-306-46172-9
Online ISBN : 978-0-306-47569-6
eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive
Share this chapter
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
- Publish with us
Policies and ethics
- Find a journal
- Track your research
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
That design is called diagnostic research. design. Explanatory Research. Design. The situation or problem is already there and the researcher is. going to elaborate or interpret it. Two designs ...
about the role and purpose of research design. We need to understand what research design is and what it is not. We need to know where design fits into the whole research process from framing a question to finally analysing and reporting data. This is the purpose of this chapter. Description and explanation Social researchers ask two ...
Research Design and Research Methods 47 research design link your purposes to the broader, more theoretical aspects of procedures for conducting Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Research, while the following section will examine decisions about research methods as a narrower, more technical aspect of procedures.
research involves philosophical assumptions as well as distinct methods or procedures. Research design, which I refer to as the plan or proposal to conduct research, involves the intersection of philosophy, strategies of inquiry, and specific methods. A framework that I use to explain the inter-action of these three components is seen in Figure ...
equate research methods with research designs. For our textbook, a research design is a crucial plan for reaching the desired (type of) conclusion by answering your research question(s). Thus, a research design refers to the strategy you develop to coherently inte-grate a research project's components (Trochim et al., 2015).
Comparing Types of Research Designs. 5. Learning Objectives. When you have finished studying this chapter, you will be able to: • differentiate between research design and research method. • understand the role of mixed methods and staggered approaches in the research process. • differentiate between research and consulting projects.
Figure 1: Summarized form of research design types. 2.1 Quantitative Research Design Quantitative research design is the technique and measurements that produces quantifiable/discrete values (Kothari, 2007). The collected data results from empirical observations and measures. These methods require a good amount of time and planning.
A research design is a strategy for answering your research question using empirical data. Creating a research design means making decisions about: Your overall research objectives and approach. Whether you'll rely on primary research or secondary research. Your sampling methods or criteria for selecting subjects. Your data collection methods.
So, research design is the implementation plan for the research study. That plan allows us to accomplish the desired (type of) conclusion by answering the research question. A research design refers to the overall strategy that a researcher integrates the different components of the research study in a logical way (de Vaus, 2001; Trochim, 2005).
Identify which one of the types of research designs you will use in your study. 6. Describe the differences between quantitative methods, qualitative methods, and mixed methods research. 7. Identify the reasons for choosing either a quantitative, qualitative, or nt c st r istribte mixed methods approach to use in your study.
Types of Research Designs Compared | Guide & Examples. Published on June 20, 2019 by Shona McCombes.Revised on June 22, 2023. When you start planning a research project, developing research questions and creating a research design, you will have to make various decisions about the type of research you want to do.. There are many ways to categorize different types of research.
Research Design A common feature of qualitative projects is that they aim to create understanding from data as the analysis proceeds. This means that the research design of a qualitative study differs from that of a study that starts with an understanding to be tested, where often the hypothesis literally dictates the form, quantity, and scope ...
research involves philosophical assumptions as well as distinct methods or procedures. The broad research approach is the . plan or proposal to conduct research, involves the intersection of philosophy, research designs, and spe-cific methods. A framework that I use to explain the interaction of these three components is seen in Figure 1.1.
2 Following are the eight different descriptors of research design. 1- Degree of Research Question Crystallization A study may be exploratory or formal. The distinctions between the two are the (a) degree of structure, and (b) the immediate objective of the study. Exploratory studies tend toward loose structures, with the objective of discovering future research tasks.
The type of question dictates the type of study design. Primary research is research which seeks to obtain new data about the phenomena studied, while secondary research is the research which analyses the data and results of studies already done. The types of research can be classified as quantitative (correlational, comparative, experimental ...
1.9.1 Meaning of Research Design 1.9.2 Characteristics of Research Design 1.9.3 Steps in Research Design 1.10 Concept of Hypotheses 1.11 Summary 1.12 Glossary 1.13 References/Bibliography 1.14 Suggested Readings 1.15 Terminal Questions 1.1 INTRODUCTION Research is an activity that leads us to finding new facts, information, assisting us in
While many books and articles guide various qualitative research methods and analyses, there is currently no concise resource that explains and differentiates among the most common qualitative approaches. We believe novice qualitative researchers, students planning the design of a qualitative study or taking an introductory qualitative research course, and faculty teaching such courses can ...
Research Design Research design provides a way to examine the relation of cause and effect in a specific population (Susser, 1991). This section explores the ba sic study designs used in epidemiologi-cal research, as well as several hybrid designs. Other resources should be consulted for a more extensive discussion. Types of Research
Science Research 3.3 FUNCTIONS OF RESEARCH DESIGN Regardless of the type of research design selected by the social investigator, all plans perform one or more functions outlined and discussed below. The number of functions performed by any design largely depends upon its sophistication, coupled with the researcher's concerns. 3.3.1 As a Blue Print