research proposal on waste management in ghana

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .

Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality

Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Department of Agro-Enterprise Development, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Ho Technical University, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana

Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Centre for Health Policy Advocacy Innovation & Research in Africa (CHPAIR-Africa), Accra, Ghana

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Affiliation Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana

Roles Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Samuel Yaw Lissah,
Martin Amogre Ayanore,
John K. Krugu,
Matilda Aberese-Ako,
Robert A. C. Ruiter

Published: March 11, 2021
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392
Peer Review
Reader Comments

Increased population growth and rapid urbanization have resulted in the generation of large quantities of solid waste across major urban cities in Ghana, outstripping local authorities’ ability to manage and dispose of waste in a sanitary manner. This study explored the perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in the Ho municipality of Ghana on solid waste management practices. A qualitative inquiry was conducted by adopting a phenomenological approach, using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions for data collection. A total of 35 participants, made up of 12 managers and 23 supervisors took part in the study. Transcribed data were imported into NVivo 11.0 software for coding. Content analysis was applied to analyze all transcribed data using processes of induction and deduction. The results showed that organizational capacity, resources, and expertise; community factors such as socio-cultural beliefs and a low sense of responsibility towards solid waste management among urban residents; contextual factors such as regulations, and weak enforcement all influence and shape the level of efficiency and effectiveness of solid waste management practices in the study setting. The findings suggest that policy frameworks and procedures implemented to curb poor urban waste management practices should be systematic and thorough in order to tackle the issue of solid waste in the study setting and Ghana in general. The nature of the identified issues and challenges requires multidimensional and multilevel interventions to provide sustainable solutions for managing urban waste in Ghana.

Citation: Lissah SY, Ayanore MA, Krugu JK, Aberese-Ako M, Ruiter RAC (2021) Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality. PLoS ONE 16(3): e0248392. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392

Editor: Bing Xue, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, GERMANY

Received: October 22, 2020; Accepted: February 25, 2021; Published: March 11, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Lissah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: The full versions of the transcripts cannot be shared publicly because participants did not consent to it and the limited number of participants being recruited in two easily identifiable settings would threaten the participants’ privacy and the confidentiality of their answers. For data inquiries about this research, you can contact or send an email to the administrator from the ethics committee of Ghana Health Service where ethical approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. The details are below: Madam Hannah Frimpong Research & Development Division Ghana Health Service P.O. Box MB 190, Accra Email: [email protected] .

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Globally, the volume of solid waste generated is increasing as a result of population density, economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization [ 1 ]. It is estimated that an average of 1.9 billion tons of solid waste is generated annually in most cities in the world [ 2 ]. Effective solid waste management thus plays a major role in combatting the health and environmental concerns urbanized cities suffer from, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [ 1 , 3 , 4 ]. In SSA, waste generation is estimated to be about 62 million tonnes per year [ 5 ]. The effective and efficient management of solid waste is one of the biggest challenges local government authorities face, especially in urban settings [ 6 , 7 ]. Increased population growth and urbanization have resulted in increased generation of large quantities of solid waste across many cities in developing countries, outstripping local authorities’ ability to manage and dispose of solid waste in a sanitary manner [ 8 – 10 ]. Despite spending 30 to 50% of their operational budgets on solid waste management, cities in low- and middle-income countries such as Ghana, only collect between 50 and 80% of the waste generated [ 11 , 12 ]

In Ghana, about 12,710 tons of solid waste is generated daily, with only 10% collected and disposed of at designated dumping sites [ 13 , 14 ]. A major challenge in the management of solid waste in Ghana is the collection and disposal process, which are labor-intensive and often not effective. In urban cities in Ghana, issues relating to proper solid waste disposal is a major challenge for the local government authorities. City authorities and waste companies are often overwhelmed by the volume of waste generated daily [ 15 , 16 ]. The lack of well-planned and efficient strategies to manage waste is one reason for the poor state of solid waste management, particularly by municipal authorities in Ghana [ 17 ]. It is estimated that 50 to 70% of the budget of municipal authorities is used to tackle the management and disposal of waste [ 18 ]. It has been reported that city authorities in Ghana spend about GHc 6.7 million (US$ 3.45 million) annually on the collection and transport of waste for disposal, and GHc 550,000.00 (US$ 0.28 million) per month to pay waste contractors and for landfill maintenance [ 19 ]. Poor sanitation as a result of indiscriminate waste disposal alone is estimated to cost the country $290 million every year- an equivalent to 1.6% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product [ 19 ].

Major factors hindering proper management of solid waste in Ghana are rapid population growth and urbanization, inadequate supply of waste bins, lack of waste transportation systems, low public awareness on the health consequences of poor waste management, and weak enforcement of environmental regulations [ 15 , 16 , 20 ]. Besides, urban residents’ poor behavioral practices towards solid waste is reflected in littering the streets and water passage-ways as well as other public spaces [ 21 ]. Low technical know-how on proper solid waste management processes by waste company managers further contribute to the challenges regarding solid waste management [ 14 , 22 ]. The consequences of indiscriminate or unsafe disposal of solid waste into open drains and water bodies could contribute to flooding and disease outbreaks [ 21 , 23 ]. Despite successive governments’ initiatives such as the empowerment of local government authorities to regulate waste management and policy on private sector participation in waste control, challenges remain in managing waste in many urban cities in Ghana [ 15 , 16 ]. Other challenges such as inadequate waste infrastructure, inadequate equipment, and insufficient operational funds to support waste management activities have also been reported [ 13 , 15 ]

Managers and supervisors of waste companies play important roles in waste management processes since they are considered to be key decision-makers regarding waste collection, transportation, and disposal to ensure that it takes place in an effective and efficient manner without contaminating land, air, and water sources [ 24 ]. In addition, managers and supervisors oversee waste management activities such as landfill sites, ensure compliance with existing legislation and bye-laws in the transportation, handling, and disposal of solid waste. They interact with the public on regular basis such as dealing with enquiries and complaints from the general public, as well as investigating and making follow-ups on claims on illegal disposal of solid waste, and work with other regulatory agencies. By these multiple roles, they are in a good position to share experiences on the strengths and weaknesses in solid waste management in the local Ghanian context. Despite the importance of effective waste management for the well-being and health of the general public, which places enormous obligation on managers and supervisors, they are rarely acknowledged. In effect, most skilled workers tend to move to other better sectors, so maintaining sufficient skills and expertise is a problem for waste companies [ 25 , 26 ]. The work of managers and supervisors is costly, time-consuming, and complex to manage, partially because most of the time they have to work across multiple locations, yet they seem not to be heard. Despite previous studies [ 27 – 29 ] on solid waste management in Ghana, very scarce literature exists till date on the views and perspectives of waste company managers and supervisors on urban waste management practices.

This study seeks to fill this gap in the literature by exploring and understanding how policy implementation, organizational, and community factors influence solid waste management in an urban municipality of Ghana. The findings of the study are also important as the study explored the weight of the responsibility placed on managers and supervisors of waste companies in Ghana, and how they strive to achieve the competing objectives of managing solid waste economically, socially, and in an environmentally friendly manner [ 30 ]. The findings will inform local government authorities and other stakeholders on best practices to improve on solid waste management performance in urban cities in Ghana and similar contexts across SSA.

Materials and methods

Study design and approval.

A phenomenological qualitative research design was used and it employed in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect data in the two waste management companies referred to as Company A and Company B. There are only two waste management companies in the study area and the sample came from both companies. In line with the qualitative study approach, the present study seeks to explore and understand human phenomena and experiences of the study participants rather than striving for generalizable findings [ 31 , 32 ]. The use of phenomenology allows for free expressions of the views and experiences of the participants on the phenomenon being studied [ 33 , 34 ]. The data used in this study is part of a large qualitative study that examined occupational health risks among domestic waste collectors and their supervisors and managers in the Ho municipality of Ghana. Part of the qualitative evidence involving domestic waste collectors has already been published in a study [ 35 ]. For the present study, transcripts on the views and experiences of managers and supervisors of two waste companies on urban solid waste management in the Ho Municipality of Ghana were analyzed and presented.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Ghana Health Service (GHSERC 08/05/17) and the Ethics Review Committee of Psychology and Neuroscience at Maastricht University, the Netherlands (ERCPN 188_10_02_2018) approved the study. The study ensured confidentiality, privacy, and anonymity of both participants and the waste companies. Both written and verbal consent were obtained from each participant prior to data collection.

Study setting and population

The study was carried out in the Ho Municipality, the administrative capital of the Volta Region of Ghana. In 2018, the projected population of the Municipality was estimated at 213,960, with 51% being females [ 36 ]. The Municipality was chosen for the study because of its present challenges in the management of solid waste [ 37 ]. Anecdotal evidence in the Ho Municipality shows some reasons for the present challenges of waste management, including poorly built infrastructure and the built-environment arrangements, making it difficult to properly manage waste. In addition, economic activities in the Municipality tend to generate large volumes of solid waste daily, which see minimal collection and disposal regularly. The indiscriminate disposal of solid waste by residents is another reason for the poor state of environmental challenges the Municipality faces [ 37 ].

The study population comprised two groups of line managerial staff working in two licensed companies (Company A and B) in the Ho Municipality. Managers and supervisors (participants) were primarily responsible for decision-making, coordination, and supervision of waste collection and disposal in the two companies. To be recruited, eligible participants in companies A and B should have served one year or more in the role as manager or supervisor.

Sampling procedures and data collection

The data were collected between April-June 2018. Company A is a quasi-private company, while company B is a fully private company. The two companies are responsible for managing public waste collection and disposal in the Ho Municipality. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling techniques. Due to differences in the company’s size and staffing numbers, a proportionate sampling technique was used to select participants in the two companies to participate in the study. Company A had a relatively large workforce compared to company B. In company A, 15 supervisors and 10 managers were purposively sampled, while eight supervisors and two managers were sampled purposively from company B to participate in the study (N = 35;12 managers and 23 supervisors). Given that the study employed a qualitative design approach, the 35 study participants were based on thematic saturation rather than a statistical calculation. Therefore, the conclusions are based on analytic generalization and transferability and not on the statistical model of generalizability. It stays the same that wide generalizations would have to rely on further studies as also noted in the discussion section. The different categories of the study participants who were purposively selected enable the study to reached saturation after the field of interest. i.e., no new information on the major themes were obtained [ 38 – 40 ]. The purposive sampling technique supports the investigator to understand and describe in-depth a particular group with similar experiences regarding the challenges of solid waste management in the study setting [ 41 ].

Data was collected with the use of In-depth Interviews (IDIs) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) guides. The development of the interview guides was informed by an initial review of the literature on issues such as socio-demographic characteristics, infrastructure and capacity of waste companies to deal with practices of solid waste management, attitudes and perceptions of the community towards solid waste management, and barriers (technical and financial) of solid waste management. The interview guides were pre-tested with two managers and two supervisors each from both companies and minor errors in tense structure made for clarity.

Three research assistants (RAs) were recruited to assist in data collection based on their prior experience in field-based data collection and a good understanding of ethical procedures in research. In addition, RAs had a fair knowledge of the study background and were fluent in the native language. The RAs were trained on how to undertake field observations and to administer informed consent to study participants. The principal investigator supervised and monitored focus group discussions/interviews to ensure that the RAs followed the laid procedures for the data collection by the research team. One RAs conducted the interviews, while another was the recorder and the note taker. In addition, field observations were also documented by the RAs. Before the study, the two solid waste company managers and supervisors were selected with the assistance of the Municipal Environmental Health Officers (MEHOs) in the municipality after informing the MEHOs of the purpose of the study. The managers of the waste companies were then informed by the MEHOs about the study, and were requested to inform their supervisors of the study and its purpose with the research team in attendance. The waste companies were willing to participate in the study and dates for data collection were fixed and agreed upon by the research team and the participants.

Study instrument

In total, 23 supervisors enrolled in the FGDs. Three FGDs were conducted among the supervisors of the two waste management companies; two FGDs in company A and one FGD in company B. An average of eight participants participated in each FGD session [ 42 ]. FGD was useful for the understanding of participants’ knowledge and experiences in managing urban waste. FGDs are applied in qualitative research to assess not only what people think but also how they think and why they think that way [ 43 ]. Regarding IDIs, 12 interviews were conducted with managers from both waste companies: ten in company A and two in company B at venues of their convenience. FGDs lasted an average of 60 minutes (excluding informed consent process) whilst IDIs lasted for an average of 20 minutes. Interviews were conducted in English until data saturation was reached [ 39 ]. Table 1 presents the number of qualitative interviews by type of interview.

PPT PowerPoint slide
PNG larger image
TIFF original image

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392.t001

Data analysis

All FGDs and IDIs were audio-recorded and transcribed. The principal investigator (PI) transcribed the interviews while one author (MAA) checked a sample of the transcripts against the audio files to validate the transcriptions. Transcribed data were then imported into QSR NVivo 11.0 software for coding and analysis. Content analysis was applied to analyze all transcribed data using processes of induction and deduction [ 44 , 45 ]. In the first step of the content analysis, transcripts were read several times to familiarize themselves with the data and to identify common patterns of ideas and views expressed by participants. A follow-up process of ‘digging deeper’ into the identified lines of transcripts to make meaning of the data (extracting significant views) was undertaken to further create sub-categories and sub-themes. A final inductive stage of analysis was conducted where sub-themes were merged into final themes. The results are presented below as descriptive narratives supported by illustrative quotes.

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

Twenty-three supervisors and 12 managers were included in the analyses from the two waste companies. The average age of the participants ranged from 31–40 years. The majority of participants were educated to the senior high school level. Further details of participants’ socio-demographic characteristics are presented in Table 2 .

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392.t002

The themes that emerged from the study

Three key themes that emerged from the analyses were organizational, community, and contextual factors influencing waste management in the Ho Municipality. Organizational factors that influenced waste management included organizational capacity, resources, and expertise. Community factors included socio-cultural beliefs influencing negative attitudes of residents and a low sense of responsibility towards solid waste management. Contextual factors included rules, regulations, and the enforcement thereof. Fig 1 presents a framework of factors determined in the study to influence waste management practices and the details of the emergent themes are presented in the subsequent sub-sections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392.g001

Organizational factors

Inadequate solid waste infrastructure and capacity to deal with the process of waste collection..

The managers’ and supervisors’ who participated in the study avowed that the manual manner in which waste collection and disposal activities are undertaken in the Municipality poses a challenge to the effective and efficient collection and disposal of solid waste. Participants mentioned inadequate equipment to undertake routine waste collection activities, leading to over-reliance on labor-intensive procedures as a common feature of solid waste management processes in the two companies. Study participants reported that solid waste collection trucks, compactors, and other heavy-duty equipment needed for effective solid waste management are mostly inadequate given, the large volumes of waste generated in the Municipality on a regular basis. Participants indicated that occasionally when their trucks break down, large volumes of solid wastes are not collected leading to frequent occurrences of cholera and other dirt-related infectious diseases. Most study participants mentioned the insufficient number of public waste bins for temporal storage of waste at some collection points, often leading to indiscriminate disposal of waste by residents.

… We have solid waste management problems in the municipality, because of the inadequate number of equipment for collecting and disposing of waste (Manager, Company B) … Non-availability of solid waste bins for the urban residents to dump solid waste in the Municipality lead to poor sanitation (FGD Supervisor Company B)

With regard to the transport of solid waste, participants reported that the common modes of transport for solid waste management in the Municipality is the use of simple tools such as tricycles and wheelbarrows, particularly when financial constraints make it difficult to collect and dispose of large quantities of waste using skip loaders and compactor trucks.

… we use tricycles, power tillers, three-wheeled tractors, and headloads to collect waste in places by manual sweeping and transporting to dumping sites. (FGD, Supervisor, Company A)

Participants reported that solid waste disposal methods presently used include landfilling, open burning, and dumping of solid waste at open disposal sites. These methods are often described as “archaic” and not effective. Participants mentioned that incineration, composting, and recycling were some of the best practices in waste management; however, they were not practiced in the Municipality due to lack of expertise, engineering knowledge, and funds. The lack of capacity to adopt some of these best practices for managing solid waste explains the use of “archaic” practices.

… over here, we are still practicing the archaic method of managing solid waste by landfilling, open dumping, burning, and burying (Manager Company A)

Lack of expertise/skilled workforce.

The waste companies are not able to attract personnel with the required skills because of poor conditions of service and remuneration to staff in waste companies. Study participants in both IDIs and FGDs identified inadequate staff with the requisite technical expertise and training to undertake effective supervision and educational support of activities aimed to improve solid waste management processes in the Municipality. They reported that because of their low educational background, they lack the requisite skills/expertise, and capacity to train workers and to support the design of educational strategies to influence residents’ positive behavioral practices on solid waste management. The lack of expertise and skilled managers and supervisors is believed to be due to poor remuneration, resulting in the low attraction of skilled workforce to the sector.

Ehhh we have problems attracting qualified and dedicated personnel to the sector, because of poor payment of wages and the tediousness of the job (FGD, Supervisor Company B) Hmm because of our low educational background, only a few of us the managers, and supervisors have knowledge in the proper standard of solid waste management practices. The majority of the managers and supervisors depend on posters or leaflets prepared for solid waste management. (Manager Company B)

Financial factors.

The participants mentioned inadequate funds to purchase equipment and to meet other recurrent expenditure needs such as fuel, personal protective equipment (PPE), and emoluments as major impediments to effective solid waste management. It was also reported that the majority of urban residents are not willing to pay for solid waste collection, as they feel that they do not get the needed services. The failure of local government authorities to meet their financial commitments to private waste companies on a timely manner impacts negatively on the sustainability of private waste companies and their ability to undertake frequent waste collection and disposal in the Municipality. One identified bottleneck for the inability of local authorities to timely pay waste companies engaged to manage waste is because of the inadequate collection of sanitation levies from residents and delays from the central government in allocating funds to local authorities to manage waste. Participants reported that they get low returns on investments from sanitation levies although urban residents complained of the high cost of sanitation levies which average GH¢ 300 (USD$ 56) per year.

Participants stated that some urban residents dump solid waste indiscriminately in places such as open drains, and along the streets instead of dumping at appropriate waste collection points that require fee-for-service charges, because of the perceived high cost of sanitation levies.

… the fees we charge are high and most urban residents find it difficult to pay, so they still do illegal dumping of refuse. Anytime it rains, they put the waste into the running water (FGD Company B) . …how we get funding is that we have a contract with the Municipal Assembly and the Municipal pays for solid waste delivery services. However, we have to pre-finance the solid waste collection before we are paid and the Municipal struggles to pay us and thereby delaying effective solid waste collection (Manager Company A)

Perceived low sense of responsibility towards managing solid waste

Attitudes and risks perceptions of the community towards solid waste..

Negative attitudes of urban residents towards environmental sanitation in general, coupled with the perception that public waste will be collected by “the government” was highlighted by participants as a challenge to waste management in the study setting. The participants attributed these negative attitudes and perceptions by the urban residents to a lack of awareness and education on proper solid waste disposal and the potential effects of poor environmental sanitation on health and wellbeing. Some participants explained that the majority of the urban residents are unaware of the associated risks and harmful effects of improper waste disposal to human life and the environment.

The challenge is the human attitude towards waste management. Because people dump waste indiscriminately, people will carry refuse from their homes and dump it outside the container, instead of dumping it inside. They claim the waste company will come and collect.’(FGD Company A)

The participants further indicated that the urban residents hold the views that the local government authority is responsible for the collection, and final disposal of solid waste through their waste management departments, and their Environmental Health and Sanitation Department. Indiscriminate littering is perceived as acceptable by community residents since it offers the opportunity for people to be employed by the waste companies. Managers and supervisors avowed that most residents of the Municipality are not interested and willing to pay for the services of waste collection and disposal provided by waste companies but only feel responsible for the cleanliness of their homes.

Some of the urban residents will intentionally litter solid waste, and say that if they don’t litter solid waste, the waste companies who are responsible for managing solid waste would not have work to do (FGD Company A) . The community thinks it is the responsibility of waste management companies to keep the environment clean and will litter indiscriminately (Manager Company B)

Participants revealed that limited behavior change communication (BCC) activities to sensitize residents on best and safe practices of solid waste management in the Municipality contributed to poor attitudes and low-risk perceptions of the community towards solid waste management. Relating to BCC activities, participants cited inappropriate communication channels when communicating messages on environmental sanitation to residents and limited access to information on safe and hygienic solid waste disposal methods, as attributable reasons why some residents have poor attitudes and perceptions towards solid waste management.

We announce a way that is not clear when we are in our moving vehicles with our old equipment (Manager Company A) We have poor communication channels and limited access to information to the urban residents for them to support and take part in proper solid waste management (Manager Company B) . What we can say is that we do not provide adequate education and awareness raising on proper solid waste disposal to the urban residents, which is also a cause for the challenges of solid waste management (FGD Company B).

Environmental/contextual factors to solid waste management

Contextual factors..

Weak enforcement of environmental rules and bye-laws by local government regulatory agencies was mentioned as a bottleneck to the effective management of solid waste in the Municipality. The majority of the discussants spoke on how legal-political barriers tend to hamper effective solid waste management processes. Managers and supervisors perceived that existing bye-laws were ineffective due to misunderstandings regarding roles and responsibilities among regulatory agencies. The Environmental Health Unit under the Ministry of Local Government feels responsible in part and the Environmental Protection Agency that has the final authority to take action on offenders is located under the Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology. The location of two agencies in different ministries, both responsible for environmental sanitation was noted as creating a weak regulatory framework. Also, respondents revealed that the waste companies hardly conduct effective monitoring and evaluation of routine activities, which hinders their ability to provide support and supervision of staff directly involved in waste collection.

There is a lack of proper coordination amongst regulatory agencies tackling solid waste and other environmental issues and this affects waste management activities . (Manager Company A) Weak enforcement of existing laws by local authorities tend to hamper our work as implementers in the field of managing waste. Often, we also face political interferences when we try to take legal action against residents or institutions not adhering to state laws on environmental sanitation (Manager Company B)

Socio-cultural beliefs influenced community attitudes and practices in waste disposal.

Participants indicated that socio-cultural practices, norms, and beliefs contribute to the negative attitudes of community members towards solid waste management. Another belief held by residents was the feeling of limited there was limited time or space to dispose of waste during the day-time. They reported dumping of waste at night is often preferred since these practices are covertly done. These beliefs resulted in solid waste not being disposed of in a timely and appropriate manner. Thus, piles of solid waste continued to build up in communities.

The community and some of the residents believe that sweeping is not done in the night since it brings bad luck and poverty to the community (FGD Company B) . … the lack of involvement of the community to participate and cooperate with the waste companies in solid waste management can lead to indiscriminate solid waste disposal (Manager Company B)

This study explored Municipal waste company managers’ and supervisors’ perspectives and experiences on solid waste management in Ghana using a qualitative inquiry approach. Most of Ghana’s discourses on solid waste management have highlighted the apparent breakdown of the regulatory agencies assigned to deal with solid waste management at the local government level [ 46 ]. This is based on the fact that poor policy implementation, inadequate funding, and poor technical know-how are some of the factors contributing to the breakdown of regulations on waste management and sanitation [ 47 ]. However, this study is unique from existing studies because it provides a description and a good in-depth understanding of how policy implementation, organizational, and community factors influence solid waste management in a developing country context. Although this study focuses on managers and supervisors of waste companies, it is able to bring out how the policy issues, inadequate financial commitment, poor governance systems, and negative socio-cultural norms and practices influence sanitation and solid waste management in the Ghanaian context. The focus of this study in an urbanizing environment in a developing country context is unique in providing relevant findings on how to address the broader goals for sustainable development outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6, targets (to ensure access to safe water resources and sanitation for all by 2030) [ 48 ]. Consequently, this study, which is at the heart of solid waste management, is relevant and timely and can help in identifying needs and bottlenecks for future policy development in Ghana and beyond.

The study found that limited infrastructure and capacity to manage solid waste; lack of skilled workforce; perceived low sense of responsibility towards collecting and disposing of solid waste, low-risk perception towards the harmful effects of waste, poor attitudes towards solid waste management in the community, and contextual factors adversely affect the effective management of solid waste in the study setting. Overall, the study findings corroborate existing literature that shows a firm’s organizational arrangements, financial and technical resource planning to be essential for implementing effective waste management interventions [ 13 , 49 , 50 ].

The study found that the two waste companies are constrained in dealing effectively with the collection and disposal of solid waste due to the inadequacy of equipment and logistics for waste collection and disposal. In addition, frequent break downs of large heavy-duty equipment and infrastructure disrupt the waste collection value chain, a challenge that impacts negatively on waste management in the municipality. The irregular pattern of waste collection along the waste value chain resulting from inadequate equipment and logistical challenges has been reported in previous studies in Ghana [ 16 , 51 ]. Aside from the process of waste collection, transport of waste to dumping sites remains a challenge, largely due to the lack of appropriate equipment needed to dispose of large quantities of waste. It was noted that there was over-reliance on simple tools/equipment, particularly tricycles and wheelbarrows to transport and dispose of waste, including large quantities of waste. However, the findings of the study is not consistent with the recommended norm for disposal of large quantities of waste that includes specialized machinery, and equipment such as compactors, skip loaders, and waste disposal trailers [ 52 ].

The findings also show that the irregularity in waste collection and disposal creates health and environmental issues in the Municipality, with the occurrences of cholera and other dirt-related infectious diseases as noted by Kogi and Takramah [ 53 ]. Health problems are also attributed to the indiscriminate manner in which residents in the municipality dispose of waste, with the excuse that physical infrastructure such as public waste bins for temporal storage of waste at some collection points are inadequate. Evidence shows that unhygienic waste management practices resulted in reported cholera morbidity outcomes in the past in the municipality and other parts of Ghana as well as other settings across SSA [ 53 ]. A similar study reported that the absence of effective waste management and recycling systems is causing public health concerns in developing countries. This leads to diseases, hardship, and negative effects such as loss of income due to illness, and increased health care expenditure for the underprivileged [ 54 ]. Experience shows that regular supply of waste bins at various collection points improve easy accessibility for the residents to dump waste [ 47 , 55 ].

The study also revealed that waste disposal sites are not engineered, leading to solid waste littering in open spaces as a result of using “archaic” practices in waste management. Recommended methods such as recycling and engineered landfills are either absent or rarely used. Instead, archaic practices such as open burning, landfilling, and open dumping of waste are increasingly being used in the Municipality. These archaic practices release toxic organic pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, and furans into the air, with negative effects on the eco-systems [ 56 ]. Our findings suggest poor adherence of the two study waste companies to Ghana’s Environmental Sanitation Policy (ESP) on final disposal methods. Ghana’s ESP specifically recommends technologies for solid disposal such as sanitary landfill, controlled dumping with cover, incineration, composting, and recycling as standards for the final disposal of urban and large industrial waste [ 57 ]. To ensure adherence to the ESP, regulatory agencies such as local authorities in Ghana need to be strengthened to strictly enforce legislation and by-laws on sanitation and solid waste management in the municipality.

Our findings depict a low sense of responsibility among urban residents towards supporting waste management companies’ efforts to manage solid waste. The low sense of responsibility is also manifested in negative attitudes and low-risk perceptions of urban residents towards solid waste management in general. These negative attitudes and perceptions by the urban residents could be due to a lack of awareness raising and environmental education on the potential harmful effects of improper solid waste disposal. In this study, the phenomenon of negative attitudes and low-risk perceptions among residents is not new since existing literature shows that local government authorities face similar challenges in dealing with waste management in most urban cities in SSA [ 58 – 60 ].

The study participants perceived that urban residents show strong arguments that the local authority should be solely responsible for matters of waste management, with disregard of citizens’ contributions to the process of waste generation and disposal [ 61 , 62 ] noted that urban residents’ perception that generating waste creates job opportunities for domestic waste collectors (DWCs), and waste management companies contributed to the sense of inaction to support local authorities and waste companies to manage waste effectively. These findings suggest the need for a multi-sectoral partnership between public sector agencies to design and implement solid waste management effectively. Behavior change interventions/activities to improve urban residents’ awareness, knowledge, and cooperation for managing waste are important [ 63 ]. Local authorities and waste companies could identify multiple and innovative channels of targeting and communicating sanitation and hygiene messages to urban residents. Also, evidence indicates that appropriate communication channels can be effective when designing interventions aimed to influence positive sanitation and hygiene practices at the population level [ 64 ]

Another important finding from this study suggests that the managers’ and supervisors lacked the requisite technical and human resource management skills to effectively manage the waste processing along the value chain, contributing to the culture of poor waste management. Our finding corroborates previous studies that showed low-skilled workforce who play managerial or supervisory roles poses a serious challenge to the effective management of waste [ 65 – 67 ]. The lack of managers and supervisors of the requisite technical skills and capacity could be due to lack of training and poor condition of service in the waste management sector, making skilled workers to shun the job [ 26 , 68 , 69 ].

This study findings also show that urban resident’s refusal to pay waste management companies for services provided, contribute to the companies being under-resourced to operate at optimum. This may explain why the companies are not able to improve on the condition of service of the staff or purchase modern equipment for effective waste management. Our findings confirm previous studies that found inadequate financial resources as one of the major challenges of solid waste management in developing countries [ 19 , 65 ]. The study also supports previous studies that reported inadequate funding support for managers and supervisors for solid waste management in the urban city councils [ 68 , 70 ].

The lack of fair and firm enforcement of waste disposal laws by the local authority and political interference contributes to the poor community attitudes towards waste disposal and management. Thus, people litter indiscriminately because they know they would not be prosecuted. Previous studies in Ghana corroborate that the lack of enforcement of waste management legislation is a major obstacle to realizing effective and sustainable waste management [ 71 , 72 ]. The non-enforcement of the regulations and bye-laws on sanitation may have many underlying reasons including inadequate capacity and financial resources at the local levels [ 73 ]. In order to ensure adherence to solid waste policies, there is a need for regulatory agencies such as local authorities to strictly enforce regulations and bye-laws on sanitation and solid waste management in the urban municipality. In addition, the study found that an inefficient or lack of role clarity and coordination among regulatory agencies such as EPA and the Environmental Health Department of the municipal authority affect the implementation of waste control laws in Ghana. Similarly, studies have confirmed that the inefficient or lack of role clarity and coordination amongst the regulatory agencies adversely affect waste management in urban cities in SSA [ 65 ]. In resolving the poor solid waste management in the study setting and other developing countries, there is a need for improvements in the coordination, and capacity building among regulatory agencies for effective waste management and environmental sanitation.

Socio-cultural beliefs and practices with regard to indiscriminate solid waste disposal were perceived as contributing to poor community waste disposal practices and cooperation with waste management companies. This is consistent with studies that reported that socio-cultural beliefs such as norms, lack of participation, and cooperation by the communities serve as a challenge to efficient solid waste management in SSA [ 74 , 75 ]. When urban residents are involved in waste management, they support the waste company managers and supervisors to effectively manage solid waste [ 1 ]. The community’s participation, and cooperation in solid waste management activities from the planning stage to final disposal, and in structural reforms can enhance and motivate their sense of belonging and ownership [ 76 ]. There is a need for managers and supervisors of waste companies to adopt the positive socio-cultural beliefs and cultural practices that would promote sanitation improvement in the study setting and SSA [ 74 ]. In addition, there is a need for further research to explore the role of socio-cultural beliefs and cultural practices in solid waste management.

Study limitation

The findings of this study were limited to two waste companies that operate within the Ho Municipality of the Volta Region of Ghana. Notwithstanding, our results are relevant since managers and supervisors of waste companies in other parts of Ghana may have similar opinions and experiences regarding urban solid waste management. With only the two waste management companies in the study area, it was not practical to get similar participants outside the two companies for the pre-test. Besides, the intention was to include the pre-test data in the study if they were good enough, which was not the case [ 77 ]. We acknowledge the potential for bias and false-positive expressions among company managers and supervisors in a bid to conceal vital information regarding waste management processes in their companies. During data collection, attempts were made to reduce such a bias as possible by in-depth probing, yet one cannot rule out biases. The study design allowed for the use of participatory evaluation to construct and reconstructed participant views during interviews and for understanding the problem under investigation better. The construction and re-construction of views were important to find aberrations and consensus and to minimize false-positive views on the validity of the study findings. This approach enriched the study and provide a strong basis for this study to be generalized across similar Municipal context in Ghana or similar cultures.

Our study results indicate that waste management is an activity that involves multiple stakeholders such as government, waste companies, and the community playing effective roles. A holistic approach would need to be adopted in intervening because the problems are interlinked. In order to address the challenge multidimensional and multilevel interventions are required. However, further research is necessary for understanding the most appropriate strategy for the involvement of urban residents in solid waste management in poor-resourced settings like Ghana. For effective and efficient solid waste management, the study recommends interventions at the local government, company, and community levels.

The local government authorities need to enforce sanitation and solid waste management by-laws on solid waste management for the waste companies to follow the standard procedure in solid waste management. At the community level, there is a need for the local government authorities to enforce sanitation and waste management regulations in households for the sanitary disposal of waste. The study recommends financial support from the central government to the waste management companies for effective solid waste management practices. There is also a need for training and capacity building for regulatory agencies in order to strengthen them to enable them to strictly enforce legislation and by-laws on sanitation and solid waste management in communities. The local government authorities should provide appropriate and engineered landfill sites for waste companies to dump waste in the appropriate way in order to avoid environmental pollution and flooding.

With regards to the company level, the study recommends that waste companies should follow the standard protocol in waste management. The study also recommends that managers and supervisors of waste companies should intensify awareness raising and education on environmental sensitization to the various target group such as urban residents and the community. In order to promote hygienic way of solid waste management. There is a need for the provision of adequate logistics, solid waste bins, and facilities at vantage points for easy access and dumping of waste. There is a need for waste companies to provide motivation and attractive terms and conditions of service for the staff. This will ensure that waste companies will recruit staff with the requisite skills and qualifications for effective and efficient solid waste delivery service.

At the community level, there is a need to promote community involvement and participation in decision-making processes on sanitation issues in order to help improve on effective solid waste management. In particular, improving waste collection coverage of municipal areas, introducing mass community awareness raising and information campaigns will help to address negative community attitudes towards waste management. Also, it could encourage community members to pay for sanitation levies towards waste management. The implication is that if the various stakeholders follow these recommendations it could lead to effective and efficient solid waste management in the study setting.

Supporting information

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248392.s001

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our profound gratitude to all the study participants for sharing their opinions and experiences with the research team. Our special thanks go to Dr. Samuel Addo, and the research Assistants for assisting us in data collection.

1. UNEP. Converting waste plastics into a resources—Assessment Guidelines. Assess Guidel. 2009.
2. UNEP & CCN. Solid Waste Management in Nairobi: A Situation Analysis. 2010.
View Article
Google Scholar
4. The World Bank. What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. 2012.
PubMed/NCBI
9. UN-HABITAT. Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities. 2013.
12. Kreith F. Handbook of Solid Waste Management. McGraw Hill, USA. 1994.
14. Mensah, A. and Larbi E. solid waste disposal in ghana. WELL FACTSHEET uk—Regional Annex. 2005.
18. Ocran L. “Waste Management Would Reserve the Fading Value of Ghana as a Tourist Site”, The Chronicle, Wednesday June 7 Edition. The Chronicle,. 2006.
19. Water and Sanitation Program. Economic impacts of poor sanitation in Africa: Ghana. Africa: economics of sanitation initiative. 2012.
26. Onibokun AG. Managing the monsters: urban waste and governance in Africa. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa. Int Dev Res Centre, Ottawa. 1999.
31. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd Edition). 2009.
36. GSS. Projected population by district and sex, Volta Region, 2010, 2015–2020. Accra:Ghana Statistical Service. 2018.
37. UN-HABITAT. GHANA: HO CITY PROFILE. 2009.
41. Varkevisser C et al. Designing and conducting health systems research projects. 1991.
46. E S. Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management-A Qualitative Study on Possibilities and Solutions in Mutomo, Kenya; Department of Ecology and Environmental Science (EMG), Umea University: Umea, Sweden. 2013.
48. UN. Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation. 2018.
53. Kogi R, Takramah WK. The Trend and Prone Areas of Cholera Outbreaks: A Review of the Cholera Line List Form (2011–2015) in Ho Municipality, Ghana. 2020; February.
54. The World Bank. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. 2001.
56. UN-HABITAT. Water and sanitation in the world’s cities 2010. 2010.
57. MLGRD. Environmental Sanitation Policy of Ghana. 2010. http://www.modernghana.com/news/447887/1/environmental-sanitation-policy-of-ghana.html .
62. Ofong I. Community participation in solid waste management. In: People-Centred Approaches to Water and Environmental Sanitation: Proceedings of the 30th WEDC Conference. 2004.
63. World Bank. Drinking water, sanitation, and. In: World Bank Development Report 2004. 2004.
65. Ogawa H. Sustainable solid waste management in developing countries. In: 7th ISWA International Congress and Exhibition, parallel session 7. 2008.
68. Ogawa H. Sustainable Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries. WHO Western Pacific Regional Environmental Health Centre (EHC). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Accessed at: http://www.gdrc.org/eem/waste/swmfogawa1.htm . 13/09/2020. 2002.
69. Kironde JML. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Onibokun, A.G. (Ed). Managing the Monster. Urban Waste and Governance in Africa. 101–172. Ottawa; IDRC. 1999.
71. Zhu D, Asani PU, Zurbrugg C, Anapolsky S, Mani S. Improving Municipal Solid Waste Management in India, A Sourcebook for Policy Makers and Practitioners by The World Bank Washington, D.C. 2008.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List

Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality

Samuel Yaw Lissah

1 Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2 Department of Agro-Enterprise Development, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Ho Technical University, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana

Martin Amogre Ayanore

3 Centre for Health Policy Advocacy Innovation & Research in Africa (CHPAIR-Africa), Accra, Ghana

John K. Krugu

4 KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Matilda Aberese-Ako

5 Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana

Robert A. C. Ruiter

Associated data.

The full versions of the transcripts cannot be shared publicly because participants did not consent to it and the limited number of participants being recruited in two easily identifiable settings would threaten the participants’ privacy and the confidentiality of their answers. For data inquiries about this research, you can contact or send an email to the administrator from the ethics committee of Ghana Health Service where ethical approval was obtained for the conduct of this study. The details are below: Madam Hannah Frimpong Research & Development Division Ghana Health Service P.O. Box MB 190, Accra Email: [email protected] .

Introduction

Materials and methods

Study design and approval.

Ethical approval

Study setting and population

Sampling procedures and data collection

Study instrument

Data analysis

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

The themes that emerged from the study

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is pone.0248392.g001.jpg

Organizational factors

Inadequate solid waste infrastructure and capacity to deal with the process of waste collection.

… We have solid waste management problems in the municipality, because of the inadequate number of equipment for collecting and disposing of waste (Manager, Company B) … Non-availability of solid waste bins for the urban residents to dump solid waste in the Municipality lead to poor sanitation (FGD Supervisor Company B)

… we use tricycles, power tillers, three-wheeled tractors, and headloads to collect waste in places by manual sweeping and transporting to dumping sites. (FGD, Supervisor, Company A)

… over here, we are still practicing the archaic method of managing solid waste by landfilling, open dumping, burning, and burying (Manager Company A)

Lack of expertise/skilled workforce

Ehhh we have problems attracting qualified and dedicated personnel to the sector, because of poor payment of wages and the tediousness of the job (FGD, Supervisor Company B) Hmm because of our low educational background, only a few of us the managers, and supervisors have knowledge in the proper standard of solid waste management practices. The majority of the managers and supervisors depend on posters or leaflets prepared for solid waste management. (Manager Company B)

Financial factors

… the fees we charge are high and most urban residents find it difficult to pay, so they still do illegal dumping of refuse. Anytime it rains, they put the waste into the running water (FGD Company B) . …how we get funding is that we have a contract with the Municipal Assembly and the Municipal pays for solid waste delivery services. However, we have to pre-finance the solid waste collection before we are paid and the Municipal struggles to pay us and thereby delaying effective solid waste collection (Manager Company A)

Perceived low sense of responsibility towards managing solid waste

Attitudes and risks perceptions of the community towards solid waste.

The challenge is the human attitude towards waste management. Because people dump waste indiscriminately, people will carry refuse from their homes and dump it outside the container, instead of dumping it inside. They claim the waste company will come and collect.’(FGD Company A)

Some of the urban residents will intentionally litter solid waste, and say that if they don’t litter solid waste, the waste companies who are responsible for managing solid waste would not have work to do (FGD Company A) . The community thinks it is the responsibility of waste management companies to keep the environment clean and will litter indiscriminately (Manager Company B)

We announce a way that is not clear when we are in our moving vehicles with our old equipment (Manager Company A) We have poor communication channels and limited access to information to the urban residents for them to support and take part in proper solid waste management (Manager Company B) . What we can say is that we do not provide adequate education and awareness raising on proper solid waste disposal to the urban residents, which is also a cause for the challenges of solid waste management (FGD Company B).

Environmental/contextual factors to solid waste management

Contextual factors.

There is a lack of proper coordination amongst regulatory agencies tackling solid waste and other environmental issues and this affects waste management activities . (Manager Company A) Weak enforcement of existing laws by local authorities tend to hamper our work as implementers in the field of managing waste. Often, we also face political interferences when we try to take legal action against residents or institutions not adhering to state laws on environmental sanitation (Manager Company B)

Socio-cultural beliefs influenced community attitudes and practices in waste disposal

The community and some of the residents believe that sweeping is not done in the night since it brings bad luck and poverty to the community (FGD Company B) . … the lack of involvement of the community to participate and cooperate with the waste companies in solid waste management can lead to indiscriminate solid waste disposal (Manager Company B)

Study limitation

Supporting information

Acknowledgments.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability

PLoS One. 2021; 16(3): e0248392.

Decision Letter 0

10 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-33283

Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspective and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality

Dear Dr. Lissah,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 23 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at gro.solp@enosolp . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"We acknowledge the Ghana Education Trust (GETFUND) for supporting the first author in pursuing his PhD program."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The authors received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions .

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories .

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Abstract

The study needs to state the number of possible waste management agencies (sample frame) from which the sample was taken for readers to ascertain if the sample size of two agencies are representative enough to warrant a conclusive results. Clarity should be given on how it is different from existing studies on perspectives of waste management from managers/supervisors to avoid repetition of existing knowledge.

The reason provided by authors on why only waste managers/supervisors were sampled for this study is very weak and needs to be strengthened to fit purpose. Otherwise views from waste generators in the communities could be also be obtained to corroborate the information provided by the managers/supervisors.

Materials and Methods

Authors should justify why only two companies were selected for the study, and by provide the calculations they used to obtain 35 respondents whose views provide a conclusive argument for the results. Even though limitations have been provided by the authors as possible bias been introduced, it still does not provide enough backing to justify that the views of 35 respondents may not be enough to provide basis for bringing about multidimensional and multilevel interventions that the authors suggest. The results therefore remain inconclusive and skewed towards the two companies which may be infinitesimal in the business of waste management in the study area, unless proper evidence based justification is provided.

Also, the pre-testing of questionnaires - line 160 - could/should have been done outside the two chosen companies to avoid introduction of errors/biases in ideas for the main questionnaires. Preferably outside the jurisdiction of the study area to make it more reliable.

Results/Discussion

Findings from the study present no new knowledge of what is already known as the challenges of waste management, especially in developing countries. Results should be tailored towards unearthing exciting novel approach on representing the perspectives on waste management that could trigger response from policy makers other than the routine knowledge that yields same ineffective results.

General comments

1. Authors should be consistent in the use of percent and % - refer to lines 58 and 66

2. The study is relevant in the field of waste management. However, findings do not differ so much from existing knowledge and makes it just a repetition without bringing out any exciting information in the field.

Reviewer #2: The study was very well conducted, as demonstrated in the very detailed methodology, which outline the steps taking in arriving at the said results.

The study is pure qualitative and the author outlined in detail the process of sampling, data collection, transcription and analysis, all of which was performed systematically and through a very rigorous process.

The author has also indicated that the data is available upon reasonable request from the first author.

The document is very readable and very well written. No spelling errors identified. And no grammatical errors also observed.

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article ( what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy .

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at gro.solp@serugif . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Author response to Decision Letter 0

11 Feb 2021

Detailed revision notes on the revised manuscript

Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality” { Manuscript ID: PONE-D-20-33283}

We thank the two reviewers for their useful feedback and comments on the manuscript. As authors, we feel that the review comments received have helped to improve the manuscript’s quality and readability. In this section, we provide a point-by-point response on the review comments.

Reviewer #1

Reviewer #1: Comment 1 Abstract

Clarity should be given on how it is different from existing studies on perspectives of waste management from managers/supervisors to avoid repetition of existing knowledge.

Authors’ Response

On the comment regarding sample frame, the number of possible waste management agencies from which the sample was taken and its representativeness are provided on page 6, lines 120-124, and also on page 8, lines 163-170 of the revised manuscript.

On page 20, lines 406-423 of the revised manuscript, the authors have provided further and detailed reasons that explain how this manuscript and the perspectives of managers/supervisors differ and is unique from other previous studies in Ghana.

Reviewer #1: Comment 2

The reason provided by authors on why only waste managers/supervisors were sampled for this study is very weak and needs to be strengthened to fit purpose. Otherwise, views from waste generators in the communities could be also be obtained to corroborate the information provided by the managers/supervisors.

In the revised manuscript (page 4-5, lines 87-97), the authors have provided reasons why managers/supervisors were sampled for this study. This study was designed to address specific research gaps in relation to company managers/supervisors' contribution to solid waste management in Ghana. No data was collected at the community level among waste generators.

Reviewer #1: Comment 3

The justification for which only two waste companies were selected has been addressed. See page 6, lines 120-124, and also page 8, lines 163-170 of the revised manuscript

This has been addressed on page 26 lines 547-550 understudy limitations.

Reviewer #1: Comment 4

Findings from the study present no new knowledge of what is already known as the challenges of waste management, especially in developing countries. Results should be tailored towards unearthing exciting novel approach on representing the perspectives on waste management that could trigger a response from policy makers other than the routine knowledge that yields same ineffective results.

This study has unearthed context-specific perspectives of how managers/supervisors view the societal challenge of solid was management in Ghana. The findings add to existing evidence on the subject of waste management and the institutional and societal bottlenecks associated with waste management in Ghana. In the revised manuscript (page 5-6 lines 107-115), the authors have provided key results that this study unearthed and how these findings can shape the course of waste management policies in Ghana.

Reviewer #1: Comment 5

The text has been revised to ensure consistency in the use of percent and % ( see page 3 line 65) as recommended.

See response to comment 1 above on the added value of the study on page 20 lines 406-423.

Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2; Comment: The study was very well conducted, as demonstrated in the very detailed methodology, which outline the steps taking in arriving at the said results.

We thank the reviewer for the feedback and comments on the manuscript. The authors are very grateful for these positive comments.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

26 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-33283R1

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ , click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact gro.solp@sserpeno .

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: The authors have sufficiently addressed arising issues from the previous review and have satisfactorily provided evidence in the revised format to back their conclusion.

Where few sample size were used, authors have justified the reasons which are sound to merit scientific publication.

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article ( what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Acceptance letter

Dear Dr. Lissah:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact gro.solp@sserpeno .

If we can help with anything else, please email us at gro.solp@enosolp .

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Bing Xue

Transforming the e-waste Management Sector in Ghana: Progress on Regulatory and Institutional Strengthening

Conference paper
First Online: 17 April 2021
Cite this conference paper

research proposal on waste management in ghana

E. Awere 6 &
A. Bonoli 6

389 Accesses

Informal recycling of e-waste in Ghana particularly at Agbogbloshie has attracted global attention. The environmental and health impacts of open burning of e-waste have been well researched. To avert the unsound management practices, Ghana has received extensive support from NGOs, development partners and research Institutions. This paper discusses Ghana’s progress in transforming the e-waste management sector with particular emphasis on policy, regulatory and institutional strengthening. Data was collected through the review of scientific literature, local media and NGO reports. In addition, informal discussions were held with some informal e-waste recyclers at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site. E-waste specific policy/regulatory frameworks are the Hazardous and Electronic Waste Control and Management Act, 2016 (Act 917), Hazardous, Electronic and other Wastes Control and Management Regulations, 2016 (LI 2250) and Technical Guidelines on Environmentally Sound E-waste Management in Ghana. One of the greatest achievements in terms of institutional strengthening is the selection of Société Générale de Surveillance (SGS) for the collection of advance eco levy pursuant to Sect. 21 of Act 917. Amid these achievements, the following gaps require immediate attention: formalizing the e-waste sector, enforcing e-waste regulations and guidelines, intensifying public education and promoting public private partnership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Available as PDF
Read on any device
Instant download
Own it forever
Available as EPUB and PDF
Compact, lightweight edition
Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Agyei-Mensah, S., Oteng-Ababio, M.: Perceptions of health and environmental impacts of e-waste management in Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 22 (6), 500–517 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2012.667795

Article Google Scholar

Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Agyekum, O.O., Pwamang, J.A., Mueller, E., Fasko, R., Schluep, M.: Ghana e-waste country assessment. SBC e-waste Africa project, Dubendorf (2011)

Google Scholar

Andoh, D.: Work on $30m e-waste recycling facility at Agbogbloshie to begin this year. Graphic Online (2018). https://www.graphic.com.gh/business/business-news/work-on-30m-e-waste-recycling-facility-at-agbogbloshie-to-begin-this-year.html

Asante, K.A., Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Agusa, T.: E-waste recycling in Africa: risks and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 18 , 109–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.04.001

Asante, K.A., Pwamang, J.A., Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Ampofo, J.A.: E-waste interventions in Ghana. Rev. Environ. Health 31 (1), 145–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0047

Atiemo, S., Faabeluon, L., Manhart, A., Nyaaba, L., & Schleicher, T.: Baseline assessment on e-waste management in Ghana. Accra, Ghana (2016). https://www.sustainable-recycling.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Sampson_2016_SRI-Ghana.pdf

Awere, E., Obeng, P.A., Bonoli, A., Obeng, P.A.: E-waste recycling and public exposure to organic compounds in developing countries: a review of recycling practices and toxicity levels in Ghana. Environ. Technol. Rev. 9 (1), 1–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2020.1714749

Awusah, B.: Government targets $100m from imported e-waste annually. Myjoyonline (2018). https://www.myjoyonline.com/business/2018/august-10th/govt-targets-100m-from-imported-e-waste-annually.php

Baldé, C.P., Forti, V., Gray, V., Kuehr, R., Stegmann, P.: The global e-waste monitor 2017: Quantities, flows and resources, Geneva, Bonn, Vienna (2017). https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6341/Global-E-waste_Monitor_2017__electronic_single_pages_.pdf

Balde, C. P., Wang, F., Kuehr, R., Huisman, J.: The global e-waste monitor 2014: Quantities, flows and resources, Geneva, Bonn, Vienna (2015)

Brigden, K., Labunska, I., Santillo, D., Johnston, P.: Chemical contamination at e-waste recycling and disposal sites in Accra and Korforidua, Ghana. In. Amsterdam: Greenpeace (2008)

CEHRT Environmental Consulting. Technical Report on the Sustainable Management of E-Waste in Ghana (2015). https://greenadgh.com/images/documentsrepository/EwasteTechnicalReportWorldBank.pdf

Daum, K., Stoler, J., Grant, R.: Toward a more sustainable trajectory for e-waste policy: a review of a decade of e-waste research in Accra, Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 (2), 135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020135

Diaz-Barriga, F.: Evidence-based intervention programs to reduce children’s exposure to chemicals in e-waste sites (2013)

Environmental Protection Agency, & Sustainable Recycling Industries. Technical guidelines on environmentally sound e-waste management for collectors, collection centres, transporters, treatment facilities and final disposal in Ghana. Accra, Ghana Environmental Protection Agency (2018). https://www.sustainable-recycling.org/ewaste-guidelines-ghana_2018_epa-sri/

Government of Ghana. Hazardous and electronic waste control and management Act of 2016 (Act 917). Accra, Ghana: Government of Ghana (2016). https://greenadgh.com/images/documentsrepository/HazardousandElectronicWasteControl.pdf

Heacock, M., Kelly, C.B., Asante, K.A., Birnbaum, L.S., Bergman, Å.L., Bruné, M.-N., Huo, X.: E-waste and harm to vulnerable populations: a growing global problem. Environ. Health Perspect. 124 (5), 550 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1509699

Herat, S., Agamuthu, P.: E-waste: a problem or an opportunity? REVIEW of issues, challenges and solutions in Asian countries. Waste Manag. Res. 30 (11), 1113–1129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12453378

Huang, J.Y., Nkrumah, P.N., Anim, D.O., Mensah, E., Whitacre, D.M.: E-waste disposal effects on the aquatic environment: Accra, Ghana. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 229 , 19–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03777-6_2

Manhart, A., Schleicher, T., Degreif, S.: Global Circular Economy of Strategic Metals - The Best-of-two-Worlds Approach (Bo2W), Germany (2014)

McElvaney, K.: Agbogbloshie: The world's largest e-waste dump - in pictures (2014). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2014/feb/27/agbogbloshie-worlds-largest-e-waste-dump-in-pictures

Oteng-Ababio, M.: Electronic waste management in Ghana-issues and practices. In Sustainable Development-Authoritative and Leading Edge Content for Environmental Management. IntechOpen Limited, London (2012a)

Oteng-Ababio, M.: When necessity begets ingenuity: E-waste scavenging as a livelihood strategy in Accra. Ghana. Afr. Stud. Q. 13 (1/2), 1 (2012b)

Oteng-Ababio, M.M., Amankwaa, E.F.: The e-waste conundrum: balancing evidence from the north and on-the-ground developing countries’ realities for improved management. Afr. Rev. Econ. Finan. 6 (1), 181–204 (2014)

Parajuly, K., Thapa, K.B., Cimpan, C., Wenzel, H.: Electronic waste and informal recycling in Kathmandu, Nepal: challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 20 (1), 656–666 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0610-8

Prakash, S., Manhart, A., Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Agyekum, O.O.: Socio-economic assessment and feasibility study on sustainable e-waste management in Ghana. In: Accra: Ghana: Öko-Institut eV in cooperation with Ghana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) & Green Advocacy Ghana, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, VROM-Inspectorate (2010)

Pwamang, J.A.: Government policy and initiatives on e-waste in Ghana. In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Global E-Waste Management (GEM) Network Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA (2013)

Srigboh, R.K., Basu, N., Stephens, J., Asampong, E., Perkins, M., Neitzel, R.L., Fobil, J.: Multiple elemental exposures amongst workers at the Agbogbloshie electronic waste (e-waste) site in Ghana. Chemosphere 164 , 68–74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.089

Step Initiative. One global definition of e-waste, Bonn, Germany (2014). https://www.step-initiative.org/files/step/_documents/StEP_WP_One%20Global%20Definition%20of%20E-waste_20140603_amended.pdf

Sustainable Recycling Industries. Ghana’s way towards sustainable e-waste recycling – First country in Africa to officially launch guidelines for environmentally sound e-waste management (2018). https://www.sustainable-recycling.org/ghanas-way-towards-sustainable-e-waste-recycling-first-country-in-africa-to-officially-launch-guidelines-for-environmentally-sound-e-waste-management/

Switch Africa Green. Hanisa e-waste model (HEMOD) (2017). https://www.switchafricagreen.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=316:hanisa-e-waste-model-hemod&Itemid=824&lang=en

World Economic Forum. A New Circular Vision for Electronics: Time for a Global Reboot, Geneva (2019). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_New_Circular_Vision_for_Electronics.pdf

Yamoah, S.B.: E-waste in developing country context-Issues, challenges, practices, opportunities: Addressing the WEEE challenge in Ghana. (Master of Science), Aalborg University (2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, via Terracini 28, 40131, Bologna, Italy

E. Awere & A. Bonoli

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Awere .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria

Joseph N. Mojekwu

Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Wellington Thwala

Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Clinton Aigbavboa

Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast, Ghana

Lawrence Atepor

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Samuel Sackey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this paper

Cite this paper.

Awere, E., Bonoli, A. (2021). Transforming the e-waste Management Sector in Ghana: Progress on Regulatory and Institutional Strengthening. In: Mojekwu, J.N., Thwala, W., Aigbavboa, C., Atepor, L., Sackey, S. (eds) Sustainable Education and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68836-3_39

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68836-3_39

Published : 17 April 2021

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-68835-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-68836-3

eBook Packages : Engineering Engineering (R0)

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Find a journal
Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

Research Proposal: The paradox of electronic waste in urban populations of Agbogbloshie Ghana: Environmental impacts vs impacts on socio-economic livelihoods

Related Papers

Tupe Crawley

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Richard Grant

The Journal of Modern African Studies

Ebenezer F Amankwaa

Obed Agyekum

Anne Mette Lykke

africa.ufl.edu

Martin Oteng-Ababio

African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

kwasi adarkwa

Novelty Journal

LOUIS DOGBATSEY

Introduction: The growing generation of electrical and electronic waste poses a global threat to public health and the environment. These wastes, comprising 4.5-6% of total waste, contain toxic and hazardous substances of health and safety concerns in the African region including Ghana. Aim: To evaluate and identify the health and safety and environment impacts on the e-waste dealers during recycling, collection, and dismantling of e-waste devices at two selected sites in Ghana. Method: E-waste dealers in Ashaiman and Agblogbloshie sites burn electrical and electronic appliances, exposing people to toxic chemicals and causing environmental pollution. Sampling and sample size estimation were used to select a representative sample of workers to provide situation dada using structured questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions to collect operational data. SPSS is used to analyze the collected data. Results: Most of the e-waste dealers are unaware of the health and health risks associated with burning circuit boards and batteries. These activities many cause skin burns, lung infections, and eye itching among workers exposed. Conclusion: There is significant progress in the Health and Safety assessment and risk mitigation infrastructure in Ghana but more effort is needed to ensure that the environment and e-waste workers are adequately protected from the risks associated with e-waste waste management practices in Ghana.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

John Arko-Mensah

Electronic waste (e-waste) is a worldwide problem in terms of increasing production rate in the global waste stream. Its recycling is known to be associated with adverse health outcomes. The recycling site at Agbogbloshie is a major e-waste recycling hub which presents enormous health threats to the residents in this community as a result of exposure to complex mixtures of chemicals associated with the poor work methods employed. This paper describes the processes involved in e-waste recycling at Agbogbloshie and discusses some of the associated health and psychosocial challenges. Direct field observations and in-depth interviews of eight e-waste workers were conducted from November, 2017 to December, 2017. Results from a thematic analysis of the data gathered; suggest that inappropriate recycling methods, financial constraints, and the high physical demands of e-waste recycling work were associated with adverse musculoskeletal health conditions among the workers. A more systematic ...

International Journal of Environmental Health Research

Michael Osei Asibey

RELATED PAPERS

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Bianca Stenmark

Chasqui Revista Latinoamericana De Comunicacion

Juçara Brittes

Lawrence Hurd

Hydrobiologia

Patricia Kandus

Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology

Stephen Karanja

Journal of Molecular Biology

Hermann-Josef Thierse

Nanocomposites with Unique Properties and Applications in Medicine and Industry

Igor Borovik

christian iber

JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi)

Deddy Susilo

Informe Medico

Miguel Quiroz

Cahiers d’études africaines

Jean-Jacques Mandel

Yuxuan Zhang

Experimental Cell Research

John hANcock

BMC Medical Genetics

Diogo Santos

Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Ninez Y Juventud

Claudia Jurado

Palaces of Hope

Miia Halme-Tuomisaari

Rini Estika

Jorge Domingo

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Arun Nagdev

Psicol Saúde Doença

Tania Gaspar

Organization Management Journal

Lynn Miller

Sherly Addiba

Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

Jose Palacios-vargas

Revista Colombiana De Filosofia De La Ciencia

Jorge Enrique Martinez

Call for Proposal: Integrated Plastic Waste Management

January 17, 2022.

Photo: UNDP Ghana

The Global Environment Facility Small Grant Programme (GEF-SGP) at the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ghana announces the 2021/22 "call for proposals" to award small grants of up to US$50,000 to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and community groups to undertake a systems analysis approach to the development and implementation of solutions that address upstream, midstream, and downstream management of plastic pollution, including baseline analysis, advocacy for policy development and implementation, development and implementation of waste management models, education and campaigns.

The grant would be applied to the following activities:

1) Systems baseline analysis and preparation of baseline report and national action plan

Baseline: analyze who is producing/using what plastics, where, and how to dispose of the plastic waste
Stakeholders’ consultation and identification: what plastics are essential? How to minimize the use or import of plastics? What actions will be needed to achieve desired outcomes to eliminate non-essential plastics? What government policies are needed to implement the changes? What activities should be undertaken to shift human behaviors? (A series of stakeholders’ workshops, meetings, and focus group discussions to identify areas of reduction).
Design and implementation of activities in the national action plans.

2) Development and implementation of community-based zero waste management systems demonstration sites (waste intelligent communities and cities)

Prevent, reduce, and eliminate unnecessary and non-essential plastic products to stop pollution at their source.
Develop and implement actions to rethink, reuse, reduce, recycle, and environmentally dispose of waste, following waste management hierarchy.
Support the development of ecological alternatives and solutions.
Incorporate informal waste sectors and enhance livelihoods for informal workers.
Conduct regular clean-up for awareness-raising advocacy and behavioral change.

3) Policy development and implementation

Support policy formulation and implementation (including a ban on single-use plastics, extended producers’ or importers’ responsibility, and incentives for clean environment).
Undertake awareness-raising and advocacy for the ban of non-essential single-use plastics.
Conduct Government-civil society-private sector meetings/dialogues to formulate and implement policies and regulations.

4) Awareness-raising, public participation and global campaigns

Develop awareness-raising materials and outreach activities.
Develop and implement intensive and regular awareness-raising and public participation activities (such as weekly clean-up activities, radios/TVs programs, and social media campaigns).
Organize the Annual Zero Single-Use Plastic Week Campaign, June 8 th World Ocean’s Day and/or Clean-up Campaign on World Clean-up Day on the third Saturday of September with whole-of-society participation (high-level government officials, businesses, and civil society organizations).

Eligibility

To qualify for the grant award, the applicant must:

be non-governmental or non-profit organizations with a legal mandate to operate;
be community groups/community-based organizations, and social enterprise organizations recognized by the relevant municipal authorities;
have relevant experience and proven records of working with communities and groups in environmental, forestry and/or agricultural related activities and should be based or already have a working presence in the respective countries and priority geographical areas;
be the lead organization that should propose a plan of engaging governments, research institutes, communities, media, and other key stakeholders. University/research institutes can be engaged for the baseline analysis.

Project Geographic Area

This project aims at scaling up an integrated community-based plastic waste management system in three municipalities in the Great Accra region namely: Korle-Klottey Municipal (Capital: Osu ) Krowor Municipal (Capital: Nungua ), La-Dade-Kotopon Municipal (Capital: La ) and Ledzokuku Municipal (Capital: Teshie-Nungua )

Submitted project proposals should take a systems analysis to understand the plastic pollution problem in these areas and propose solutions. The submitted project proposals should:

include all of the four components.
succinctly describe the problems related to the geographic area.
explain how the proposed project objectives, outputs and activities would have a concrete impact and contribute towards the achievements of the identified problems.
demonstrate how the project is aligned to the targets and objectives of the SGP Country Program Strategy (CPS).
show that the projects are innovative, impactful, and sustainable.
promote social inclusion, including gender equality and women’s empowerment.

What will the project support?

The project will:

Focus on prevention, reduction and elimination of non-essential plastic use, particularly single plastic use.
Identify producers, distributors, and users’ responsibilities, and develop policies on “extended producer responsibility” and “polluter pays” policies and instruments.
Support women, youth, people with disability and offer livelihoods activities to develop and pilot ecological alternatives to single-use plastic.
Support formalization and empowerment of informal waste sector, and develop capacity for the informal waste sector
Intensive awareness, education and civic engagement must be incorporated.
Identify and develop good practices and scale up good practices through learning, sharing and policy adoption.
Strong government support and policy development activities.
Strong partnerships with local governments, businesses, and civil society organizations.

What the project will not support

Pure clean-up activities will not be effective. Clean-up could be part of awareness-raising strategies, but no project should be funded only to clean up local trash.
Recycling and remanufacturing of plastics are in most cases not economically viable and should not be a priority of this program. Recycling can be funded as part of a temporary solution only if: 1) the country has an existing recycling facility; 2) markets for products are available with demonstrated economic viability; and 3) environmental safeguards analysis is conducted. If recycling activity is included, empowering women in the informal waste sector should be the focus. No funding should be invested in creating a recycling facility, infrastructure, and products.
Pure awareness-raising activities will not drive behavior changes. Awareness-raising should be part of a comprehensive offer that includes reduction, demonstration, and policy measures to address plastic pollution.
The CSO’s responses will allow for a collaborative review and interaction with the SGP to get the necessary briefing on the project.
The SGP secretariat will make sure that applicants understand the project so that their responses could be measured against the evaluation criteria and other applicants’ responses.
Clarify any questions that come in from the applicant about the project.

Time Framework:

Call for proposals are opened from the date of this advertisement until January 31, 2022. Applications would be processed as and when they are received, and successful applicants would be notified accordingly. The full details on the eligibility criteria, preferred bio-geographic areas, the project strategy, guidelines for applications, and project application document are attached to this call. However for any further information, please send a request to [email protected] or [email protected] ; or write directly to The National Coordinator , UNDP GEF-SGP, P. O. Box 1423, Accra. Tel/WhatsApp. +2330505740909.

For further details, please download the call for proposal document which includes the application process and template here.

Harnessing Innovation and indigenous knowledge for Zero waste

Publications, application form: call for proposals for energy efficiency grant, application guidelines: call for proposals for energy efficiency grant.

Press Releases

Undp experiment shows promise for environmentally friendly packaging in ghana.

Results from experiment by the UNDP Accelerator Lab in Ghana on upstream approaches to reducing plastic pollution, suggest that Ghanaians are willing to use alter...

Upstream approaches to reducing the generation of plastic waste in Ghana

Online polls conducted by the AccLab and TroTro Diaries (a large Facebook community) point to the public’s increasing preference for environmentally-friendly pack...

The Federal Register

The daily journal of the united states government, request access.

Due to aggressive automated scraping of FederalRegister.gov and eCFR.gov, programmatic access to these sites is limited to access to our extensive developer APIs.

If you are human user receiving this message, we can add your IP address to a set of IPs that can access FederalRegister.gov & eCFR.gov; complete the CAPTCHA (bot test) below and click "Request Access". This process will be necessary for each IP address you wish to access the site from, requests are valid for approximately one quarter (three months) after which the process may need to be repeated.

An official website of the United States government.

If you want to request a wider IP range, first request access for your current IP, and then use the "Site Feedback" button found in the lower left-hand side to make the request.

IMAGES

Challenges and Prospects of Solid Waste Management in Ghana
(PDF) Solid Waste Management in Urban Areas of Ghana: Issues and
(PDF) Critical Issues of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Ghana
[PDF] Theoretical Framework for Plastic Waste Management in Ghana
(PDF) SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN GHANA
(PDF) Solid Waste Disposal Management Practices in Ghana, A Case Study

COMMENTS

PDF National Solid Waste Management Strategy for Ghana
Between 2005 and 2012, the Ghanaian economy grew at an impressive 7.7% per year on average, largely driven by commodity exports (primarily cocoa and gold) and the start of commercial oil production in 2011. However, GDP growth rates slowed between 2012 and 2016, averaging 5.6%, while picking up again to 8.5% in 2017.
(PDF) Solid Waste Disposal Management Practices in Ghana ...
3.1 Households Solid W aste Disposal Practices. Although the majority of residents in Subin use refuse bins provided by a waste management. ZoomLion Company Limited, a waste management company ...
(PDF) Solid Waste Management Practices in Ghana ...
spent in managing wastes 14. This is expected to rise to $375 billion by 2025, with the sharpest cost increases in developing co untries. 14. Solid waste management in Ghana has been faced with ...
(PDF) Solid Waste Management In Ghanaian Towns; A Case ...
First, it was our objective to. examine the means of waste disposal by households (place of disposal). In the study we. identified that the means of disposal was 61.9% indiscriminate and the rest ...
Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and ...
Introduction. Globally, the volume of solid waste generated is increasing as a result of population density, economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization [].It is estimated that an average of 1.9 billion tons of solid waste is generated annually in most cities in the world [].Effective solid waste management thus plays a major role in combatting the health and environmental concerns ...
PDF Policy & Programme Recommendations Ghana Integrated Waste Management
Ghana Waste Fair 2021 and actions related to building a vibrant and sustained waste management ecosystem in Ghana. At the end of the process, a total of 17 key recommendations were agreed to be used as the basis for policy level engagement with government and other relevant stakeholders to co-design and / or strengthen institutional
Policy and Programme Recommendations- Ghana Integrated Waste Management
At the end of the process, a total of 17 key recommendations were agreed to be used as the basis for policy level engagement with government and other relevant stakeholders to co-design and / or strengthen institutional structures to support innovative solutions for waste management in Ghana. Download the report for details.
PDF ghana
Session 1: How to Unlock Green Finance for Waste Management in Ghana 8 Session 2: Scaling Up Solutions for Waste Management to Achieve Impact of Scale 9 ... Launch of Green Recovery Proposal 21 Session 4: Preview of the Ghana Waste Recovery Website 22 Annex I: List of Exhibitors 23 ... research institutions, local authorities and the media ...
Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of
Introduction. Globally, the volume of solid waste generated is increasing as a result of population density, economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization [].It is estimated that an average of 1.9 billion tons of solid waste is generated annually in most cities in the world [].Effective solid waste management thus plays a major role in combatting the health and environmental concerns ...
Theoretical Framework for Plastic Waste Management in Ghana through
Currently, use and disposal of plastic by consumers through waste management activities in Ghana not only creates environmental problems, but also reinforces the notion of a wasteful society. The magnitude of this problem has led to increasing pressure from the public for efficient and practical measures to solve the waste problem. This paper analyses the impact of plastic use and disposal in ...
PROPOSAL.docx
RESEARCH PROPOSAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IN GHANA: TRENDS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY Managing waste to reduce its negative impact on environment has become one of the paramount challenges of the present century. Exponential population growth, rapid urbanisation and increases in environmentally destructive activities has led to an increase in the amount of waste generated ...
Transforming the e-waste Management Sector in Ghana ...
The review focused on the progress of e-waste management in Ghana following the passage of the Hazardous and Electronic Waste Control and Management Act, 2016 (Act 917). ... Grant, R.: Toward a more sustainable trajectory for e-waste policy: a review of a decade of e-waste research in Accra, Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(2), 135 ...
PDF Microsoft Word
Most of the concern for waste management in Ghana is with the urban areas than the rural areas. Urban areas in Ghana produce a variety of waste. The predominant wastes being domestic solid waste, industrial waste and construction waste. These wastes are sent to a few dumpsites, but majority end up in drains, streams and open places.
(PDF) Prospects of Waste Incineration for Improved ...
The per capita municipal solid waste (MSW) generation per day in Ghana is estimated to be 0.47 kg/person/day, which translates to over 14,000 tonnes of solid waste generation daily.
PDF Theoretical Framework for Plastic Waste Management in Ghana through
treatment have been implemented to handle the type and quantity of waste generated in Ghana, their contributions to the effective management of waste have been insignificant and low [8,9]. 2. Objectives of the Paper The paper seeks to propose theoretic al scenarios for sachet water wast e collections, the most prominent plastic waste in Ghana.
PDF Waste Management in Ghana: A Case of Tema and Ledzokuku-Krowor Assemblies
addressing waste in Ghana on an extensive basis. The purpose of the dissertation is to look at the current strategies, opportunities and challenges of solid waste management in Ghana. Objectives of the study The objectives of the research were to: i. Examine the solid waste management strategies adopted in Teshie, Nungua, and Tema
[PDF] Electronic waste control and management in Ghana: A critical
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X221103939 Corpus ID: 249622023; Electronic waste control and management in Ghana: A critical assessment of the law, perceptions and practices @article{OwusuTwum2022ElectronicWC, title={Electronic waste control and management in Ghana: A critical assessment of the law, perceptions and practices}, author={Maxwell Y Owusu-Twum and Gifty Kumi-Amoah and William K. Heve and ...
PDF Transforming the e-waste Management Sector in Ghana ...
This paper looks at the progress made in transforming the e-waste sector in Ghana. The paper focuses on Ghana's progress on policy, regulatory and institutional strengthening. 2 Overview of e-waste Management Process E-waste collection, recycling and ﬁnal disposal is performed by both the formal and informal sectors.
(DOC) Research Proposal: The paradox of electronic waste in urban
Name: Tupe Crawley ID: 300296603 Email: [email protected] ENVI314/Assignment1/Research Proposal The paradox of e-waste; impacts on the environment vs impacts on socio-economic livelihoods in Agbogbloshie Ghana: 'An analysis of e-waste management implications and the need for extensive interdisciplinary literature on e-waste impacts for better outcomes' Abstract: E-waste, or waste from ...
PDF Solid Waste Management Practices in Ghana: Challenges ...
as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana. Waste Manag. 2015 Dec 1;46:15-27. 13. GhanaWeb. Accra generates 3,000 metric tonnes of waste in a
PDF Baseline Study
sustainable e-waste management. Additionally, the Legislative Instrument (LI 2250) was adopted. Technical Guidelines on e-waste management are in the process of being operationalized. At present, recycling and reuse of e-waste in Ghana is predominantly done by the so-called informal sector.
(PDF) Waste management practices in Ghana: challenges and prospect
Specific challenges highlighted as the problem of waste management in Ghana include growing urban population, changing patterns of production and consumption, poor planning for Waste 2023, 1 314 ...
Call for Proposal: Integrated Plastic Waste Management
The Global Environment Facility Small Grant Programme (GEF-SGP) at the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Ghana announces the 2021/22 "call for proposals" to award small grants of up to US$50,000 to non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and community groups to undertake a systems analysis approach to the development and implementation of ...
Federal Register :: Risk Management and Financial Assurance for OCS
A detailed summary of all public comments on the proposal and their corresponding responses are available in the memorandum titled, Start Printed Page 31545 Risk Management and Financial Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant Obligations: Response to Public Comments Received on the June 29, 2023, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the docket for this ...
(PDF) Effectiveness of waste management interventions at the new
Electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) has become an emerging environmental and human health problem in the world in the 21st century. Recently, the developing nations of West Africa (e.g ...

Managing urban solid waste in Ghana: Perspectives and experiences of municipal waste company managers and supervisors in an urban municipality

Introduction

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

Study setting and population

Sampling procedures and data collection

Study instrument

Data analysis

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

The themes that emerged from the study

Organizational factors

Lack of expertise/skilled workforce.

Financial factors.

Perceived low sense of responsibility towards managing solid waste

Environmental/contextual factors to solid waste management

Socio-cultural beliefs influenced community attitudes and practices in waste disposal.

Study limitation

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

Samuel Yaw Lissah

Martin Amogre Ayanore

John K. Krugu

Matilda Aberese-Ako

Robert A. C. Ruiter

Materials and methods

Ethical approval

Study setting and population

Sampling procedures and data collection

Study instrument

Data analysis

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

The themes that emerged from the study

Organizational factors

Lack of expertise/skilled workforce

Financial factors

Perceived low sense of responsibility towards managing solid waste

Environmental/contextual factors to solid waste management

Socio-cultural beliefs influenced community attitudes and practices in waste disposal

Study limitation

Supporting information

Funding Statement

Data Availability

Decision Letter 0

Author response to Decision Letter 0

Decision Letter 1

Acceptance letter

Transforming the e-waste Management Sector in Ghana: Progress on Regulatory and Institutional Strengthening

Access this chapter

Author information

Corresponding author

Editor information

Rights and permissions

Copyright information

About this paper

Download citation

Share this paper

Research Proposal: The paradox of electronic waste in urban populations of Agbogbloshie Ghana: Environmental impacts vs impacts on socio-economic livelihoods

Related Papers

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS

Call for Proposal: Integrated Plastic Waste Management

Related Content

Harnessing Innovation and indigenous knowledge for Zero waste

Press Releases

Upstream approaches to reducing the generation of plastic waste in Ghana

The Federal Register

IMAGES

COMMENTS