research questions about stem strand

• Write my thesis
• Thesis writers
• Buy thesis papers
• Bachelor thesis
• Master's thesis
• Thesis editing services
• Thesis proofreading services
• Buy a thesis online
• Write my dissertation
• Dissertation proposal help
• Pay for dissertation
• Custom dissertation
• Dissertation help online
• Buy dissertation online
• Cheap dissertation
• Dissertation editing services
• Write my research paper
• Buy research paper online
• Pay for research paper
• Research paper help
• Order research paper
• Custom research paper
• Cheap research paper
• Research papers for sale
• Thesis subjects
• How It Works

55 Brilliant Research Topics For STEM Students

Primarily, STEM is an acronym for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It’s a study program that weaves all four disciplines for cross-disciplinary knowledge to solve scientific problems. STEM touches across a broad array of subjects as STEM students are required to gain mastery of four disciplines.

As a project-based discipline, STEM has different stages of learning. The program operates like other disciplines, and as such, STEM students embrace knowledge depending on their level. Since it’s a discipline centered around innovation, students undertake projects regularly. As a STEM student, your project could either be to build or write on a subject. Your first plan of action is choosing a topic if it’s written. After selecting a topic, you’ll need to determine how long a thesis statement should be .

Given that topic is essential to writing any project, this article focuses on research topics for STEM students. So, if you’re writing a STEM research paper or write my research paper , below are some of the best research topics for STEM students.

List of Research Topics For STEM Students

Quantitative research topics for stem students, qualitative research topics for stem students, what are the best experimental research topics for stem students, non-experimental research topics for stem students, capstone research topics for stem students, correlational research topics for stem students, scientific research topics for stem students, simple research topics for stem students, top 10 research topics for stem students, experimental research topics for stem students about plants, research topics for grade 11 stem students, research topics for grade 12 stem students, quantitative research topics for stem high school students, survey research topics for stem students, interesting and informative research topics for senior high school stem students.

Several research topics can be formulated in this field. They cut across STEM science, engineering, technology, and math. Here is a list of good research topics for STEM students.

• The effectiveness of online learning over physical learning
• The rise of metabolic diseases and their relationship to increased consumption
• How immunotherapy can improve prognosis in Covid-19 progression

For your quantitative research in STEM, you’ll need to learn how to cite a thesis MLA for the topic you’re choosing. Below are some of the best quantitative research topics for STEM students.

• A study of the effect of digital technology on millennials
• A futuristic study of a world ruled by robotics
• A critical evaluation of the future demand in artificial intelligence

There are several practical research topics for STEM students. However, if you’re looking for qualitative research topics for STEM students, here are topics to explore.

• An exploration into how microbial factories result in the cause shortage in raw metals
• An experimental study on the possibility of older-aged men passing genetic abnormalities to children
• A critical evaluation of how genetics could be used to help humans live healthier and longer.

Experimental research in STEM is a scientific research methodology that uses two sets of variables. They are dependent and independent variables that are studied under experimental research. Experimental research topics in STEM look into areas of science that use data to derive results.

Below are easy experimental research topics for STEM students.

• A study of nuclear fusion and fission
• An evaluation of the major drawbacks of Biotechnology in the pharmaceutical industry
• A study of single-cell organisms and how they’re capable of becoming an intermediary host for diseases causing bacteria

Unlike experimental research, non-experimental research lacks the interference of an independent variable. Non-experimental research instead measures variables as they naturally occur. Below are some non-experimental quantitative research topics for STEM students.

• Impacts of alcohol addiction on the psychological life of humans
• The popularity of depression and schizophrenia amongst the pediatric population
• The impact of breastfeeding on the child’s health and development

STEM learning and knowledge grow in stages. The older students get, the more stringent requirements are for their STEM research topic. There are several capstone topics for research for STEM students .

Below are some simple quantitative research topics for stem students.

• How population impacts energy-saving strategies
• The application of an Excel table processor capabilities for cost calculation
•  A study of the essence of science as a sphere of human activity

Correlations research is research where the researcher measures two continuous variables. This is done with little or no attempt to control extraneous variables but to assess the relationship. Here are some sample research topics for STEM students to look into bearing in mind how to cite a thesis APA style for your project.

• Can pancreatic gland transplantation cure diabetes?
• A study of improved living conditions and obesity
• An evaluation of the digital currency as a valid form of payment and its impact on banking and economy

There are several science research topics for STEM students. Below are some possible quantitative research topics for STEM students.

• A study of protease inhibitor and how it operates
• A study of how men’s exercise impacts DNA traits passed to children
• A study of the future of commercial space flight

If you’re looking for a simple research topic, below are easy research topics for STEM students.

• How can the problem of Space junk be solved?
• Can meteorites change our view of the universe?
• Can private space flight companies change the future of space exploration?

For your top 10 research topics for STEM students, here are interesting topics for STEM students to consider.

• A comparative study of social media addiction and adverse depression
• The human effect of the illegal use of formalin in milk and food preservation
• An evaluation of the human impact on the biosphere and its results
• A study of how fungus affects plant growth
• A comparative study of antiviral drugs and vaccine
• A study of the ways technology has improved medicine and life science
• The effectiveness of Vitamin D among older adults for disease prevention
• What is the possibility of life on other planets?
• Effects of Hubble Space Telescope on the universe
• A study of important trends in medicinal chemistry research

Below are possible research topics for STEM students about plants:

• How do magnetic fields impact plant growth?
• Do the different colors of light impact the rate of photosynthesis?
• How can fertilizer extend plant life during a drought?

Below are some examples of quantitative research topics for STEM students in grade 11.

• A study of how plants conduct electricity
• How does water salinity affect plant growth?
• A study of soil pH levels on plants

Here are some of the best qualitative research topics for STEM students in grade 12.

• An evaluation of artificial gravity and how it impacts seed germination
• An exploration of the steps taken to develop the Covid-19 vaccine
• Personalized medicine and the wave of the future

Here are topics to consider for your STEM-related research topics for high school students.

• A study of stem cell treatment
• How can molecular biological research of rare genetic disorders help understand cancer?
• How Covid-19 affects people with digestive problems

Below are some survey topics for qualitative research for stem students.

• How does Covid-19 impact immune-compromised people?
• Soil temperature and how it affects root growth
• Burned soil and how it affects seed germination

Here are some descriptive research topics for STEM students in senior high.

• The scientific information concept and its role in conducting scientific research
• The role of mathematical statistics in scientific research
• A study of the natural resources contained in oceans

Final Words About Research Topics For STEM Students

STEM topics cover areas in various scientific fields, mathematics, engineering, and technology. While it can be tasking, reducing the task starts with choosing a favorable topic. If you require external assistance in writing your STEM research, you can seek professional help from our experts.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Journal for STEM Education Research

• Offers a platform for interdisciplinary research on a broad spectrum of topics in STEM education.
• Publishes integrative reviews and syntheses of literature relevant to STEM education and research.
• Promotes research on frontier topics, such as those in the intersection of technology and STEM education.
• Advances theoretical perspectives and research methodologies in STEM education.
• Encourages contributions from scholars across diverse subject content and social science fields.

Latest issue

Volume 7, Issue 1

Latest articles

Exploring factors that support pre-service teachers’ engagement in learning artificial intelligence.

• Musa Adekunle Ayanwale
• Emmanuel Kwabena Frimpong
• Ismaila Temitayo Sanusi

Examining Educational and Career Transition Points Among a Diverse, Virtual Mentoring Network

• Erika L. Thompson
• Toufeeq Ahmed Syed
• Jamboor K. Vishwanatha

Computational Thinking During a Short, Authentic, Interdisciplinary STEM Experience for Elementary Students

• Jessica F. Cantlon
• Katherine T. Becker
• Caroline M. DeLong

“I Don’t Back Away from a Fight”: Examining First Year Undergraduate Latinas’ Perseverance in STEM

• Nicora Placa
• Christine Nick

“No, This Is Not My Boyfriend’s Computer”: Elevating the Voices of Youth in STEM Education Research Leveraging Photo-Elicitation

• Daniel Edelen
• Kristin Cook
• Andrea Perrin

Journal updates

Most downloaded and cited articles from 2020 – present.

Check the 5 most downloaded and 5 most cited articles of Journal for STEM Education Research  here!

Book Series ''Advances in STEM Education''

Advances in STEM Education is a book series with a focus on cutting-edge research and knowledge development in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education from pre-college through continuing education around the world. More...

Journal information

• Google Scholar
• OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
• TD Net Discovery Service

Rights and permissions

Springer policies

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Ten Questions to Ask when Creating a STEM Culture in Education

If you are a new to, or planning for a STEM school, take a look as you plan. Already a STEM school… then use these questions to assess and determine your next journey along an amazing path!

1. What does STEM mean to the education process and culture of a school for students and educators?  So many schools have jumped onto the idea of STEM education involving Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.  The integration of these four areas is very important, but what does it mean for a building or district? We must be careful not to amplify these areas of study, while putting less emphasis on other areas of the curriculum. It is important to emphasize the idea of “Why STEM?” as your school or district takes the steps toward  STEM education.  People must understand that STEM will be a way to engage students in all content areas.

2. Are there any unintended results as we emphasize this idea of STEM?  The elements of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math are wonderful areas of study and really embrace the idea of future job growth and good salaries. Schools have addressed this idea by extending the STEM acronym with extra letters. We now find STEAM (include the Arts), STREAM (include reading), STREAMIE (include everyone.. I am still waiting to see STREAMIER (more STREAMIE) and STREAMIEST (most STREAMIE)! How big can we make the acronym as we try to embrace the entire curriculum? I think it might be how we define STEM to begin with, which leads to our next question. 3. How does your building, district, and community define STEM?  Before bringing in a STEM program, collectively decide on a definition for STEM. I like to think of STEM as a verb and not just four nouns. It is the process of students doing, thinking and connecting throughout the entire curriculum. This is the subject of a future Blog… so be sure to subscribe! Please note that I stated “a building, district, and community definition of STEM”. Everyone should be able to provide a consensus definition. While this might seem obvious, it is not always the case! 4. What does a lesson or unit look like when STEM is infused?  Is there a process that the school or district is ready to embrace and provide training on? This should involve some type of inquiry method that allows for student exploration while constraining them to mandated curriculum standards. This might include the 5E’s, a Design Method, Deeper Thinking Processes, Project Based Learning, or Problem Based Learning. It must start at the basic lesson level… before expanding to units of study. In many places, it is a classroom transformation. 5. What does a STEM Classroom look like?  I mean this in both a physical and pedagogical way. This does not take a remodel of the school, although large classrooms are nice. How does this physical classroom integrate with the pedagogy? Remember that STEM builds a culture of connected and authentic learning. Before implementation, all educators should visit some STEM classrooms and schools.  If there are not any available, take a look at PBL, Montessori, or Reggio Emilia classrooms. When visiting, spend more time observing students than teachers. Also keep in mind that some technology is needed. Take some time in determining what it is. Order the technology based on lesson needs and standards. Avoid the toys that shine until that need is determined. You will notice your technology dollars being spent much more efficiently! 6. What modification(s) may be needed to the daily schedule?  While in the beginning a school may have dedicated STEM time, a goal is to bring a STEM culture to every classroom… everyday!  That schedule change could be a long term goal and may vary among schools. How can classes and students be shared to allow for trans-disciplinary learning? What subjects can be paired together and allow for team teaching? There maybe a need for longer periods of learning. Perhaps teachers can find some ways to connect even in a traditional schedule. It all takes time, so remember … small steps. 7. How do we get ready for assessment in STEM?  I like to say that STEM assessment goes beyond the standardized test. As we use an inquiry and collaborative approach it is important to make sure all students are learning content. How do we assess not just the nouns, but also the verbs in our standards? Do we have rubrics that incorporate the 4C’s and other soft skills? I see what I call “STEMie” lessons that are based on few standards and with no assessment. How do we go beyond this? When we are intentional with standards and assessment, the standardized test will be satisfied. 8. What qualities do STEM students have upon graduation at the different levels in education?  I often say that we are not preparing students for the specific skills of a career, but rather the universal skills needed to work in any career. We need to determine these skills and qualities as as we build our STEM programs. How do we build these attributes into lessons and units and also into assessment, where the appropriate tools must be determined? As we think of careers, a STEM program must help students determine a career pathway and find passions that engage them. 9 . What are a building or district’s community connections for STEM?   Keep in mind that every community is different. The community outside the school’s walls is important for authentic learning. A STEM school must look for connections  that make learning relevant for students. Databases can be created to identify professionals, institutions, business, industry, and government entities that can be partners for real world learning. These partnerships should be a two way street. The real benefactors will be your students! 10. How does a school or district sustain the STEM momentum?   All initiatives start out with a lot of energy. Many times this begins with particular groups and individuals. How do we place this ownership with the entire institution? There may need to be some ongoing in-service along with a retelling of the story. Keep in mind that the goal is to build a STEM culture!

cross-posted at  21centuryedtech.wordpress.com

Michael Gorman oversees one-to-one laptop programs and digital professional development for Southwest Allen County Schools near Fort Wayne, Indiana. He is a consultant for Discovery Education, ISTE, My Big Campus, and November Learning and is on the National Faculty for The Buck Institute for Education. His awards include district Teacher of the Year, Indiana STEM Educator of the Year and Microsoft’s 365 Global Education Hero. Read more at  21centuryedtech.wordpress.com .

Tech & Learning Newsletter

Tools and ideas to transform education. Sign up below.

4 Star Wars Tech Tools for Teaching

How Often Are Students Submitting AI Papers? Frequently, Says New Data

Best Digital Pens For Teachers

Most Popular

Motivational Factors of Students in Choosing STEM strand in Agoncillo Senior High School SY: 2018-2019

• Liezl L. Mayuga

INTRODUCTION

In the 21st century, scientific and technological innovations have become increasingly important as we face the benefits and challenges of both globalization and a knowledge-based economy. To succeed in this new information-based and highly technological society, students need to develop their capabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). In this study, I determined the factors of students in choosing STEM strand that have the potential to engage students in shaping their skills in line with their chosen course.

A qualitative research and narrative inquiry design was used. Using a random sampling technique, the participants were selected. Ten students from grade 11 STEM responded to a set of semi-structured questions through a face-to-face interview, disregarding their personality, gender and classroom standing.

Most of the students who participated in my study chose the STEM strand for a variety of reasons. It was categorized into three themes 1) Career, wherein the student says that it is related to the course they will take in college and to the job they want to in the future. 2) Interest, were some students say that they want to challenge themselves in Mathematics and Science to improve their understandings and skills. 3) Uncontrolled Circumstances, wherein they have no other choice because of their parent's decision to take this strand. Students supposed that STEM strand is the right choice for them. The specialized subject such as Mathematics and Science in this strand is very significant to those students who need mastery in their tertiary degree.

DISCUSSIONS

The findings determine the Motivational Factors of Student in Choosing STEM Strand was classified into three categories: Career, Interest, and Uncontrolled Circumstances. Heilbronner 2011 claimed that the greater number of the students manifested to proceed to STEM courses in college. This is brought about with the quality, adequacy of preparations, and scholastic experiences of the students. The results demonstrate the need for a particular seminar about the K-12 Curriculum in every school in order for them to understand all aspects of this program. STEM Exhibit is also significant to showcase to all students what the STEM strand really is. This will lead them to appreciate all matters within this strand.

Information

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

©2017 by Ascendens Asia Pte. Ltd. | NLB Singapore-Registered Publisher.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Most Americans think U.S. K-12 STEM education isn’t above average, but test results paint a mixed picture

Most Americans believe K-12 STEM education in the United States is either average or below average compared with other wealthy nations, according to a new Pew Research Center survey.

Recent global standardized test scores show that students in the U.S. are, in fact, lagging behind their peers in other wealthy nations when it comes to math. But America’s students are doing better than average in science compared with pupils in these other countries.

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans’ ratings of K-12 STEM education in the United States. For this analysis, we surveyed 10,133 U.S. adults from Feb. 7 to 11, 2024.

Everyone who took part in the survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way, nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .

Here are the questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its methodology .

We also analyzed the latest data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which tests 15-year-old students in math, reading and science in member and partner countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This analysis only includes scores from students in the 37 OECD countries that took the 2022 PISA.

How do Americans think U.S. STEM education compares with other wealthy countries?

Just 28% of U.S. adults say America is the best in the world or above average in K-12 science, technology, engineering and math education compared with other wealthy nations. A third say the U.S. is average, while another 32% think the U.S. is below average or the worst in K-12 STEM education.

Some demographic groups are more pessimistic than others about the state of U.S. STEM education. White Americans (24%) are less likely than Black (31%), Hispanic (37%) or English-speaking Asian (43%) Americans to say U.S. K-12 STEM education is the best in the world or above average. And fewer women (25%) than men (32%) say K-12 STEM education is at least above average.

Republicans and Democrats give similar ratings to K-12 STEM education: 31% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents say it is at least above average, as do 27% of Republicans and GOP leaners.

Americans’ views today are similar to those in a 2019 telephone survey by the Center, which was conducted before the coronavirus pandemic caused major disruptions in the country’s schools. In that survey, 31% of Americans said U.S. K-12 STEM education is the best in the world or above average compared with other nations.

How does the U.S. compare with other countries in STEM test scores?

The latest figures from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) show a mixed picture in U.S. math and science scores.

As of 2022, the U.S. was below average in math but above average in science compared with other member countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a group of mostly highly developed, democratic nations:

• U.S. students ranked 28th out of 37 OECD member countries in math. Among OECD countries, Japanese students had the highest math scores and Colombian students scored lowest. The U.S. ranking was similar in 2018, the last time the test was administered. The U.S. average score for math fell by 13 percentage points between 2018 and 2022, but the U.S. was far from alone in experiencing a decline in scores. In fact, 25 of the 37 OECD countries saw at least a 10-point drop in average math scores from 2018 to 2022.
• In science, the U.S. ranked 12th out of 37 OECD countries. Japanese students ranked highest and Mexican students ranked lowest. The U.S average science score was virtually unchanged since 2018. Across OECD countries, far fewer countries experienced a large decline in science scores than in math scores. Seven OECD countries saw their mean science scores decline by 10 points or more.

PISA is taken by 15-year-old students about every three years. Students in 37 OECD countries took the 2022 PISA.

Note: Here are the questions used for this analysis , along with responses, and its methodology .

• STEM Education & Workforce

Brian Kennedy is a senior researcher focusing on science and society research at Pew Research Center .

About 1 in 4 U.S. teachers say their school went into a gun-related lockdown in the last school year

About half of americans say public k-12 education is going in the wrong direction, what public k-12 teachers want americans to know about teaching, what’s it like to be a teacher in america today, race and lgbtq issues in k-12 schools, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Age & Generations
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Economy & Work
• Family & Relationships
• Gender & LGBTQ
• Immigration & Migration
• International Affairs
• Internet & Technology
• Methodological Research
• News Habits & Media
• Non-U.S. Governments
• Other Topics
• Politics & Policy
• Race & Ethnicity
• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students In 2023

STEM means Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math, which is not the only stuff we learn in school. It is like a treasure chest of skills that help students become great problem solvers, ready to tackle the real world’s challenges.

In this blog, we are here to explore the world of Research Topics for STEM Students. We will break down what STEM really means and why it is so important for students. In addition, we will give you the lowdown on how to pick a fascinating research topic. We will explain a list of 200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students.

And when it comes to writing a research title, we will guide you step by step. So, stay with us as we unlock the exciting world of STEM research – it is not just about grades; it is about growing smarter, more confident, and happier along the way.

What Is STEM?

Table of Contents

STEM is Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. It is a way of talking about things like learning, jobs, and activities related to these four important subjects. Science is about understanding the world around us, technology is about using tools and machines to solve problems, engineering is about designing and building things, and mathematics is about numbers and solving problems with them. STEM helps us explore, discover, and create cool stuff that makes our world better and more exciting.

Why STEM Research Is Important?

STEM research is important because it helps us learn new things about the world and solve problems. When scientists, engineers, and mathematicians study these subjects, they can discover cures for diseases, create new technology that makes life easier, and build things that help us live better. It is like a big puzzle where we put together pieces of knowledge to make our world safer, healthier, and more fun.

• STEM research leads to new discoveries and solutions.
• It helps find cures for diseases.
• STEM technology makes life easier.
• Engineers build things that improve our lives.
• Mathematics helps us understand and solve complex problems.

How to Choose a Topic for STEM Research Paper

Here are some steps to choose a topic for STEM Research Paper:

Step 1: Identify Your Interests

Think about what you like and what excites you in science, technology, engineering, or math. It could be something you learned in school, saw in the news, or experienced in your daily life. Choosing a topic you’re passionate about makes the research process more enjoyable.

Step 2: Research Existing Topics

Look up different STEM research areas online, in books, or at your library. See what scientists and experts are studying. This can give you ideas and help you understand what’s already known in your chosen field.

Step 3: Consider Real-World Problems

Think about the problems you see around you. Are there issues in your community or the world that STEM can help solve? Choosing a topic that addresses a real-world problem can make your research impactful.

Step 4: Talk to Teachers and Mentors

Discuss your interests with your teachers, professors, or mentors. They can offer guidance and suggest topics that align with your skills and goals. They may also provide resources and support for your research.

Step 5: Narrow Down Your Topic

Once you have some ideas, narrow them down to a specific research question or project. Make sure it’s not too broad or too narrow. You want a topic that you can explore in depth within the scope of your research paper.

Here we will discuss 200+ Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students: 

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Qualitative research focuses on exploring and understanding phenomena through non-numerical data and subjective experiences. Here are 10 qualitative research topics for STEM students:

• Exploring the experiences of female STEM students in overcoming gender bias in academia.
• Understanding the perceptions of teachers regarding the integration of technology in STEM education.
• Investigating the motivations and challenges of STEM educators in underprivileged schools.
• Exploring the attitudes and beliefs of parents towards STEM education for their children.
• Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning on student engagement in STEM subjects.
• Investigating the experiences of STEM professionals in bridging the gap between academia and industry.
• Understanding the cultural factors influencing STEM career choices among minority students.
• Exploring the role of mentorship in the career development of STEM graduates.
• Analyzing the perceptions of students towards the ethics of emerging STEM technologies like AI and CRISPR.
• Investigating the emotional well-being and stress levels of STEM students during their academic journey.

Easy Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students:

These experimental research topics are relatively straightforward and suitable for STEM students who are new to research:

•  Measuring the effect of different light wavelengths on plant growth.
•  Investigating the relationship between exercise and heart rate in various age groups.
•  Testing the effectiveness of different insulating materials in conserving heat.
•  Examining the impact of pH levels on the rate of chemical reactions.
•  Studying the behavior of magnets in different temperature conditions.
•  Investigating the effect of different concentrations of a substance on bacterial growth.
•  Testing the efficiency of various sunscreen brands in blocking UV radiation.
•  Measuring the impact of music genres on concentration and productivity.
•  Examining the correlation between the angle of a ramp and the speed of a rolling object.
•  Investigating the relationship between the number of blades on a wind turbine and energy output.

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

These research topics are tailored for STEM students in the Philippines:

•  Assessing the impact of climate change on the biodiversity of coral reefs in the Philippines.
•  Studying the potential of indigenous plants in the Philippines for medicinal purposes.
•  Investigating the feasibility of harnessing renewable energy sources like solar and wind in rural Filipino communities.
•  Analyzing the water quality and pollution levels in major rivers and lakes in the Philippines.
•  Exploring sustainable agricultural practices for small-scale farmers in the Philippines.
•  Assessing the prevalence and impact of dengue fever outbreaks in urban areas of the Philippines.
•  Investigating the challenges and opportunities of STEM education in remote Filipino islands.
•  Studying the impact of typhoons and natural disasters on infrastructure resilience in the Philippines.
•  Analyzing the genetic diversity of endemic species in the Philippine rainforests.
•  Assessing the effectiveness of disaster preparedness programs in Philippine communities.

Read More 

• Frontend Project Ideas
• Business Intelligence Projects For Beginners

Good Research Topics for STEM Students:

These research topics are considered good because they offer interesting avenues for investigation and learning:

•  Developing a low-cost and efficient water purification system for rural communities.
•  Investigating the potential use of CRISPR-Cas9 for gene therapy in genetic disorders.
•  Studying the applications of blockchain technology in securing medical records.
•  Analyzing the impact of 3D printing on customized prosthetics for amputees.
•  Exploring the use of artificial intelligence in predicting and preventing forest fires.
•  Investigating the effects of microplastic pollution on aquatic ecosystems.
•  Analyzing the use of drones in monitoring and managing agricultural crops.
•  Studying the potential of quantum computing in solving complex optimization problems.
•  Investigating the development of biodegradable materials for sustainable packaging.
•  Exploring the ethical implications of gene editing in humans.

Unique Research Topics for STEM Students:

Unique research topics can provide STEM students with the opportunity to explore unconventional and innovative ideas. Here are 10 unique research topics for STEM students:

•  Investigating the use of bioluminescent organisms for sustainable lighting solutions.
•  Studying the potential of using spider silk proteins for advanced materials in engineering.
•  Exploring the application of quantum entanglement for secure communication in the field of cryptography.
•  Analyzing the feasibility of harnessing geothermal energy from underwater volcanoes.
•  Investigating the use of CRISPR-Cas12 for rapid and cost-effective disease diagnostics.
•  Studying the interaction between artificial intelligence and human creativity in art and music generation.
•  Exploring the development of edible packaging materials to reduce plastic waste.
•  Investigating the impact of microgravity on cellular behavior and tissue regeneration in space.
•  Analyzing the potential of using sound waves to detect and combat invasive species in aquatic ecosystems.
•  Studying the use of biotechnology in reviving extinct species, such as the woolly mammoth.

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Research topics for STEM students in the Philippines can address specific regional challenges and opportunities. Here are 10 experimental research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

•  Assessing the effectiveness of locally sourced materials for disaster-resilient housing construction in typhoon-prone areas.
•  Investigating the utilization of indigenous plants for natural remedies in Filipino traditional medicine.
•  Studying the impact of volcanic soil on crop growth and agriculture in volcanic regions of the Philippines.
•  Analyzing the water quality and purification methods in remote island communities.
•  Exploring the feasibility of using bamboo as a sustainable construction material in the Philippines.
•  Investigating the potential of using solar stills for freshwater production in water-scarce regions.
•  Studying the effects of climate change on the migration patterns of bird species in the Philippines.
•  Analyzing the growth and sustainability of coral reefs in marine protected areas.
•  Investigating the utilization of coconut waste for biofuel production.
•  Studying the biodiversity and conservation efforts in the Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park.

Capstone Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines:

Capstone research projects are often more comprehensive and can address real-world issues. Here are 10 capstone research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

•  Designing a low-cost and sustainable sanitation system for informal settlements in urban Manila.
•  Developing a mobile app for monitoring and reporting natural disasters in the Philippines.
•  Assessing the impact of climate change on the availability and quality of drinking water in Philippine cities.
•  Designing an efficient traffic management system to address congestion in major Filipino cities.
•  Analyzing the health implications of air pollution in densely populated urban areas of the Philippines.
•  Developing a renewable energy microgrid for off-grid communities in the archipelago.
•  Assessing the feasibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) for agricultural monitoring in rural Philippines.
•  Designing a low-cost and sustainable aquaponics system for urban agriculture.
•  Investigating the potential of vertical farming to address food security in densely populated urban areas.
•  Developing a disaster-resilient housing prototype suitable for typhoon-prone regions.

Experimental Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students:

Experimental quantitative research involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to conclude. Here are 10 Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For STEM Students interested in experimental quantitative research:

•  Examining the impact of different fertilizers on crop yield in agriculture.
•  Investigating the relationship between exercise and heart rate among different age groups.
•  Analyzing the effect of varying light intensities on photosynthesis in plants.
•  Studying the efficiency of various insulation materials in reducing building heat loss.
•  Investigating the relationship between pH levels and the rate of corrosion in metals.
•  Analyzing the impact of different concentrations of pollutants on aquatic ecosystems.
•  Examining the effectiveness of different antibiotics on bacterial growth.
•  Trying to figure out how temperature affects how thick liquids are.
•  Finding out if there is a link between the amount of pollution in the air and lung illnesses in cities.
•  Analyzing the efficiency of solar panels in converting sunlight into electricity under varying conditions.

Descriptive Research Topics for STEM Students

Descriptive research aims to provide a detailed account or description of a phenomenon. Here are 10 topics for STEM students interested in descriptive research:

•  Describing the physical characteristics and behavior of a newly discovered species of marine life.
•  Documenting the geological features and formations of a particular region.
•  Creating a detailed inventory of plant species in a specific ecosystem.
•  Describing the properties and behavior of a new synthetic polymer.
•  Documenting the daily weather patterns and climate trends in a particular area.
•  Providing a comprehensive analysis of the energy consumption patterns in a city.
•  Describing the structural components and functions of a newly developed medical device.
•  Documenting the characteristics and usage of traditional construction materials in a region.
•  Providing a detailed account of the microbiome in a specific environmental niche.
•  Describing the life cycle and behavior of a rare insect species.

Research Topics for STEM Students in the Pandemic:

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised many research opportunities for STEM students. Here are 10 research topics related to pandemics:

•  Analyzing the effectiveness of various personal protective equipment (PPE) in preventing the spread of respiratory viruses.
•  Studying the impact of lockdown measures on air quality and pollution levels in urban areas.
•  Investigating the psychological effects of quarantine and social isolation on mental health.
•  Analyzing the genomic variation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its implications for vaccine development.
•  Studying the efficacy of different disinfection methods on various surfaces.
•  Investigating the role of contact tracing apps in tracking & controlling the spread of infectious diseases.
•  Analyzing the economic impact of the pandemic on different industries and sectors.
•  Studying the effectiveness of remote learning in STEM education during lockdowns.
•  Investigating the social disparities in healthcare access during a pandemic.
• Analyzing the ethical considerations surrounding vaccine distribution and prioritization.

Research Topics for STEM Students Middle School

Research topics for middle school STEM students should be engaging and suitable for their age group. Here are 10 research topics:

• Investigating the growth patterns of different types of mold on various food items.
• Studying the negative effects of music on plant growth and development.
• Analyzing the relationship between the shape of a paper airplane and its flight distance.
• Investigating the properties of different materials in making effective insulators for hot and cold beverages.
• Studying the effect of salt on the buoyancy of different objects in water.
• Analyzing the behavior of magnets when exposed to different temperatures.
• Investigating the factors that affect the rate of ice melting in different environments.
• Studying the impact of color on the absorption of heat by various surfaces.
• Analyzing the growth of crystals in different types of solutions.
• Investigating the effectiveness of different natural repellents against common pests like mosquitoes.

Technology Research Topics for STEM Students

Technology is at the forefront of STEM fields. Here are 10 research topics for STEM students interested in technology:

• Developing and optimizing algorithms for autonomous drone navigation in complex environments.
• Exploring the use of blockchain technology for enhancing the security and transparency of supply chains.
• Investigating the applications of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) in medical training and surgery simulations.
• Studying the potential of 3D printing for creating personalized prosthetics and orthopedic implants.
• Analyzing the ethical and privacy implications of facial recognition technology in public spaces.
• Investigating the development of quantum computing algorithms for solving complex optimization problems.
• Explaining the use of machine learning and AI in predicting and mitigating the impact of natural disasters.
• Studying the advancement of brain-computer interfaces for assisting individuals with
• disabilities.
• Analyzing the role of wearable technology in monitoring and improving personal health and wellness.
• Investigating the use of robotics in disaster response and search and rescue operations.

Scientific Research Topics for STEM Students

Scientific research encompasses a wide range of topics. Here are 10 research topics for STEM students focusing on scientific exploration:

• Investigating the behavior of subatomic particles in high-energy particle accelerators.
• Studying the ecological impact of invasive species on native ecosystems.
• Analyzing the genetics of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and its implications for healthcare.
• Exploring the physics of gravitational waves and their detection through advanced interferometry.
• Investigating the neurobiology of memory formation and retention in the human brain.
• Studying the biodiversity and adaptation of extremophiles in harsh environments.
• Analyzing the chemistry of deep-sea hydrothermal vents and their potential for life beyond Earth.
• Exploring the properties of superconductors and their applications in technology.
• Investigating the mechanisms of stem cell differentiation for regenerative medicine.
• Studying the dynamics of climate change and its impact on global ecosystems.

Interesting Research Topics for STEM Students:

Engaging and intriguing research topics can foster a passion for STEM. Here are 10 interesting research topics for STEM students:

• Exploring the science behind the formation of auroras and their cultural significance.
• Investigating the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy in the universe.
• Studying the psychology of decision-making in high-pressure situations, such as sports or
• emergencies.
• Analyzing the impact of social media on interpersonal relationships and mental health.
• Exploring the potential for using genetic modification to create disease-resistant crops.
• Investigating the cognitive processes involved in solving complex puzzles and riddles.
• Studying the history and evolution of cryptography and encryption methods.
• Analyzing the physics of time travel and its theoretical possibilities.
• Exploring the role of Artificial Intelligence  in creating art and music.
• Investigating the science of happiness and well-being, including factors contributing to life satisfaction.

Practical Research Topics for STEM Students

Practical research often leads to real-world solutions. Here are 10 practical research topics for STEM students:

• Developing an affordable and sustainable water purification system for rural communities.
• Designing a low-cost, energy-efficient home heating and cooling system.
• Investigating strategies for reducing food waste in the supply chain and households.
• Studying the effectiveness of eco-friendly pest control methods in agriculture.
• Analyzing the impact of renewable energy integration on the stability of power grids.
• Developing a smartphone app for early detection of common medical conditions.
• Investigating the feasibility of vertical farming for urban food production.
• Designing a system for recycling and upcycling electronic waste.
• Studying the environmental benefits of green roofs and their potential for urban heat island mitigation.
• Analyzing the efficiency of alternative transportation methods in reducing carbon emissions.

Experimental Research Topics for STEM Students About Plants

Plants offer a rich field for experimental research. Here are 10 experimental research topics about plants for STEM students:

• Investigating the effect of different light wavelengths on plant growth and photosynthesis.
• Studying the impact of various fertilizers and nutrient solutions on crop yield.
• Analyzing the response of plants to different types and concentrations of plant hormones.
• Investigating the role of mycorrhizal in enhancing nutrient uptake in plants.
• Studying the effects of drought stress and water scarcity on plant physiology and adaptation mechanisms.
• Analyzing the influence of soil pH on plant nutrient availability and growth.
• Investigating the chemical signaling and defense mechanisms of plants against herbivores.
• Studying the impact of environmental pollutants on plant health and genetic diversity.
• Analyzing the role of plant secondary metabolites in pharmaceutical and agricultural applications.
• Investigating the interactions between plants and beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere.

Qualitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Qualitative research in the Philippines can address local issues and cultural contexts. Here are 10 qualitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines:

• Exploring indigenous knowledge and practices in sustainable agriculture in Filipino communities.
• Studying the perceptions and experiences of Filipino fishermen in coping with climate change impacts.
• Analyzing the cultural significance and traditional uses of medicinal plants in indigenous Filipino communities.
• Investigating the barriers and facilitators of STEM education access in remote Philippine islands.
• Exploring the role of traditional Filipino architecture in natural disaster resilience.
• Studying the impact of indigenous farming methods on soil conservation and fertility.
• Analyzing the cultural and environmental significance of mangroves in coastal Filipino regions.
• Investigating the knowledge and practices of Filipino healers in treating common ailments.
• Exploring the cultural heritage and conservation efforts of the Ifugao rice terraces.
• Studying the perceptions and practices of Filipino communities in preserving marine biodiversity.

Science Research Topics for STEM Students

Science offers a diverse range of research avenues. Here are 10 science research topics for STEM students:

• Investigating the potential of gene editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas9 in curing genetic diseases.
• Studying the ecological impacts of species reintroduction programs on local ecosystems.
• Analyzing the effects of microplastic pollution on aquatic food webs and ecosystems.
• Investigating the link between air pollution and respiratory health in urban populations.
• Studying the role of epigenetics in the inheritance of acquired traits in organisms.
• Analyzing the physiology and adaptations of extremophiles in extreme environments on Earth.
• Investigating the genetics of longevity and factors influencing human lifespan.
• Studying the behavioral ecology and communication strategies of social insects.
• Analyzing the effects of deforestation on global climate patterns and biodiversity loss.
• Investigating the potential of synthetic biology in creating bioengineered organisms for beneficial applications.

Correlational Research Topics for STEM Students

Correlational research focuses on relationships between variables. Here are 10 correlational research topics for STEM students:

• Analyzing the correlation between dietary habits and the incidence of chronic diseases.
• Studying the relationship between exercise frequency and mental health outcomes.
• Investigating the correlation between socioeconomic status and access to quality healthcare.
• Analyzing the link between social media usage and self-esteem in adolescents.
• Studying the correlation between academic performance and sleep duration among students.
• Investigating the relationship between environmental factors and the prevalence of allergies.
• Analyzing the correlation between technology use and attention span in children.
• Studying how environmental factors are related to the frequency of allergies.
• Investigating the link between parental involvement in education and student achievement.
• Analyzing the correlation between temperature fluctuations and wildlife migration patterns.

Quantitative Research Topics for STEM Students in the Philippines

Quantitative research in the Philippines can address specific regional issues. Here are 10 quantitative research topics for STEM students in the Philippines

• Analyzing the impact of typhoons on coastal erosion rates in the Philippines.
• Studying the quantitative effects of land use change on watershed hydrology in Filipino regions.
• Investigating the quantitative relationship between deforestation and habitat loss for endangered species.
• Analyzing the quantitative patterns of marine biodiversity in Philippine coral reef ecosystems.
• Studying the quantitative assessment of water quality in major Philippine rivers and lakes.
• Investigating the quantitative analysis of renewable energy potential in specific Philippine provinces.
• Analyzing the quantitative impacts of agricultural practices on soil health and fertility.
• Studying the quantitative effectiveness of mangrove restoration in coastal protection in the Philippines.
• Investigating the quantitative evaluation of indigenous agricultural practices for sustainability.
• Analyzing the quantitative patterns of air pollution and its health impacts in urban Filipino areas.

Things That Must Keep In Mind While Writing Quantitative Research Title 

Here are few things that must be keep in mind while writing quantitative research tile:

1. Be Clear and Precise

Make sure your research title is clear and says exactly what your study is about. People should easily understand the topic and goals of your research by reading the title.

2. Use Important Words

Include words that are crucial to your research, like the main subjects, who you’re studying, and how you’re doing your research. This helps others find your work and understand what it’s about.

3. Avoid Confusing Words

Stay away from words that might confuse people. Your title should be easy to grasp, even if someone isn’t an expert in your field.

4. Show Your Research Approach

Tell readers what kind of research you did, like experiments or surveys. This gives them a hint about how you conducted your study.

5. Match Your Title with Your Research Questions

Make sure your title matches the questions you’re trying to answer in your research. It should give a sneak peek into what your study is all about and keep you on the right track as you work on it.

STEM students, addressing what STEM is and why research matters in this field. It offered an extensive list of research topics , including experimental, qualitative, and regional options, catering to various academic levels and interests. Whether you’re a middle school student or pursuing advanced studies, these topics offer a wealth of ideas. The key takeaway is to choose a topic that resonates with your passion and aligns with your goals, ensuring a successful journey in STEM research. Choose the best Experimental Quantitative Research Topics For Stem Students today!

Related Posts

Step by Step Guide on The Best Way to Finance Car

The Best Way on How to Get Fund For Business to Grow it Efficiently

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Factors that affect Grade 11 Students to why they Choose STEM as their Strand

Related Papers

JASH MATHEW

Researcher Abstract-The main purpose of the study was to craft a Senior High School program offerings of University of Rizal System. It made use of the Descriptive Survey Method. Findings showed that most of the Grade 9 students selected Career Tracks and Strands are Accountancy, Business and Management (ABM), and Technical Vocational Livelihood (TVL) track. Moreover, there is a significant association between the career track choices and profile of the students in terms of sex, average family income, occupation of the head of the family, school preference and average scholastic rating in Grade 8 and no significant association between the career track choices and the highest educational attainment of the head of the family and person influential in the choice of career track.

Renan Limjuco , Mona Laya

The popularity among the majority of students and parents of such academic track strands as Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences (HESS), Liberal Arts (LA), Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and Business, Accountancy and Management (BAM) indicates the status quo in the choice of career or future employment in Region XI. This traditional frame of mind adheres to the idea that white collar jobs are still the most wanted designations future graduates look forward to. Hence, for each of the strands mentioned, Nursing or BEED, Communications, Civil Engineering and Accountancy, respectively, top the preferred courses (i.e. cited by majority of prospective Senior High School students). On the other hand, Physical Therapy, Theology, Math or Geodetic Engineering and Entrepreneurship figure as the top choices from among the less popular courses (i.e. cited by few students and parents). In the choice of career, students are likely to consider their own personality as gauge of the academic program they would go into in Senior High School (SHS); thus, it has become the most dominant factor in the pursuit of higher studies. This influence is followed closely by parents, which also play critical role in directing their children as regards the career choice. It is interesting to know that students and parents preferred public urban type of institutions for SHS. This finding implies that stakeholders, specifically students and parents of Region XI trust the capability of state colleges and universities or national high schools as provider of quality basic education (Grades 11 and 12).

Samantha Ferrer

Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Research and Statistics Center

This study determined the career choice of the high school students of the different private institutions in San Jose, Batangas as a basis for developing a career program guide to help the students in choosing their career.The descriptive method was used the study with the questionnaire and standardized test as the main data gathering instruments. Parents, students and teachers served as respondents of the study. The study revealed that most preferred career of the respondents is the academic track particularly the Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) strand. The proposed program guide formulated focused on how to help the students decide on their future career. When properly given, it will benefit the students. The researchers recommended that the proposed career program guide that has been formulated may be shown to school heads for their suggestions; the students should be provided with effective orientation on what career is really all about. This could be done by the school guidance counselor or by the teachers and parents as well and there must be a close-up tie among the guidance personnel, teachers, students, and parents to promote a better understanding of the factors which influence the career choice of the students.

The Philippine School Abu Dhabi

Kristhel Asi

This research aims to seek out and determine the influences of Overseas Filipino Workers to their children's choice if course a career among the high school students, specifically the grade 9 and 10 students of S.Y. 2019-2020. It helps in determining the relationship of the factors and influence of Parents over their children’s career. The total number of respondents compromised of Grade 9 and Grade 10 students consisting a total of 89 students. A likert-scale and a survey checklist was used to gather data in terms of: years of stay in the UAE, Parent’s Career, Factors in choosing a job. In return, the data summarized lead to a conclusion that great number of responses came from students whose parents are both working under Health and Safety, and Asia as their most preferred work place and salary being the most important factor in choosing their job. to summarize all the given data, the usage of FPR and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized. After gathering of all data, it determined and interpreted that the formulated Null hypotheses in the beginning of the research which helped them determine the outcome of the data gathered that incorporated the specifics and information that correlates in answering what are the influences of OFW Parents in their Children’s choices regarding careers.

Juvy Importante

International Journal of Information and Education Technology

glenwin bernabe

IJAR Indexing

The choice of a course and which school to enter in college is one of the major decisions faced by graduating students which is an important element of their learning process. The course and school selection decision will most likely define their future success. The paper was aimed at assessing the students? course and school preference using a descriptive research design. A survey was administered to respondents totaling 2,231 comprised of grade 12 students enrolled in La Consolacion University Philippines (LCUP) during the second semester of school year 2017-2018. Findings revealed that Accountancy, Education and Hotel and Restaurant Management were the three courses most preferred. However, LCUP was not the top school of choice among respondents. Seven out of ten most preferred courses are current offerings at LCUP, three of which are board courses. The provision of a more intensive internal marketing program is suggested. Likewise, a study on the impact of programs and services and their influence on career and school selection decisions may be conducted to determine which program or service made available to senior high students singly or in combination are determinants of their retention. Follow-up research on the reasons why students choose a course or a school may be also be considered.

Ijahsss Journal , Kevin Jade Auditor

Students' career success can be attained if proper guidance is given in choosing the right course in college, suited to their personality, ability and intellect considering their abilities, interest, values and goal as vital foundation of the career development process. This study determines the influencing factors on career preferences and their relationship. Series of interviews using a semi-structure questionnaire were done in different secondary schools of North Cotabato, Philippines. Mean and weighted mean were utilized to determine the factors and career preferences of the student-respondents. Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis were used to test the hypothesis of the study. Notable results include (1) students agree that they believe in what they can do to be successful in their chosen career; (2) parents can influence the student which course to enroll in college; (3) respondents strongly agreed to be in a school that gives value and respect to every culture; (4) high school students would like to pursue their career in a university where they can avail a special scholarship; (5) community as a factor is considered by the respondents to have influence on their career preference; (6) high school students agree that opportunity like organizations that consider balance between workers and organizational rewards; and (7) respect for family is one of the most influential factor that gave weight to students' career preference. it is therefore concluded that factors such as school, scholarship, community and opportunity have bearing on student's career preference.

Randy A Tudy

RELATED PAPERS

Alexandre Strapasson

Salim Akoojee

Hermann Zagler

Cuadernos de Ilustración y Romanticismo

Inma Molina

Dian Wulandari

nanda hafifah

American Journal of Infection Control

Hanako Misao

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Evelyn Perez

Physical Review B

Estudis d'història agrària

Gabriel Jover-Avellà

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

ALPESH PATEL

Ausra Padskocimaite

Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia

Magdalena Anna Kozak

Anita Schirm

Blutalkohol

Revista de Estudos Sociais

marcos souza

LiminaR Estudios Sociales y Humanísticos

Miguel Angel Díaz Perera

Astrophysics and Space Science

Muhammad Sharif

Nuclear Physics A

Idriss Duramany Koromah

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Sandra Shapiro

Holger Kühnhold

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Teruo Ogawa

Theofilos Karachalios

Hepatology Research

Majid Afshar

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

CSforAll: Research and RPP Program Webinar

Description.

The  Computer Science for All (CSforAll: Research and RPPs)  program is providing information on the newly revised Solicitation:  NSF 24-555  via a Zoom webinar. 

The CSforAll program aims to provide all U.S. students with the opportunity to participate in computer science (CS) and computational thinking (CT) education in their schools at the preK-12 levels. With this solicitation, the National Science Foundation (NSF) focuses on both research and research-practice partnerships (RPPs) that foster the research and development needed to bring CS and CT to all schools. Specifically, this solicitation aims to provide (1) high school teachers with the preparation, professional development (PD) and ongoing support they need to teach rigorous computer science courses; (2) preK-8 teachers with the instructional materials and preparation they need to integrate CS and CT into their teaching; and (3) schools and districts with the resources needed to define and evaluate multi-grade pathways in CS and CT.

With this updated solicitation, the next due date will be June 4, 2024.

Additional revisions include:

• The list of cognizant program officers has been updated.
• The descriptions of Small RPP strand and Research strand projects have been updated.

The webinar will include a briefing on the CSForAll program and key solicitation requirements, followed by a question-and-answer session.

Register here

EVENT DETAILS

Researchers identify causal genetic variant linked to common childhood obesity

Target gene could serve as the basis of a future therapeutic intervention.

Researchers from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) have identified a causal genetic variant strongly associated with childhood obesity. The study provides new insight into the importance of the hypothalamus of the brain and its role in common childhood obesity and the target gene may serve as a druggable target for future therapeutic interventions. The findings were published today in the journal Cell Genomics .

Both environmental and genetic factors play critical roles in the increasing incidence of childhood obesity. While the exact role of genetics in childhood obesity is still not fully understood, prior studies show that neuronal pathways in the hypothalamus control food intake and are key regulators for the disease.

Prior international genome-wide association studies (GWAS) led by CHOP investigators found specific genetic markers, or loci, linked with obesity. Most of these studies revealed loci associated with childhood and adult obesity in equal measure, and most of these loci have been in non-coding regions of the genome, which means they do not code for specific proteins, making their mechanisms much more difficult to study. This latest research focused on chr12q13, a locus harboring the nearby gene FAIM2 that generated a strikingly stronger signal with childhood obesity when compared to adult obesity.

"By focusing specifically on this locus, we were able to pinpoint a causal variant associated with one of the strongest genetic signals we have implicated in childhood obesity," said first study author Sheridan H. Littleton, PhD, a postdoctoral research associate who conducted this work as a member of the Center for Spatial and Functional Genomics team at CHOP. "With more research, there's potential to learn how the target of this variant's action may be a target for new therapies specifically designed to treat childhood obesity."

In addition to childhood obesity, the locus in question has been found to be connected to a variety of related health issues, including elevated type 2 diabetes susceptibility, increased body fat percentage in children and adults, and earlier age of menstruation. Using a variety of techniques, the researchers narrowed their focus on rs7132908, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), or variant, at the locus.

Prior related CHOP research implicated the hypothalamus in appetite, a trait that could be linked to childhood obesity. Since the hypothalamus is deep inside the brain, it is particularly challenging to study. To further study the effects of the rs7132908 variant, the researchers used stem cells that evolve into hypothalamic neurons, a key cell type associated with eating behavior, to study the variant's alleles. The allele associated with obesity risk influenced how the FAIM2 gene was expressed and decreased the proportion of neurons produced when the stem cells differentiated, suggesting that the variant is also associated with neurodevelopment.

"In spite of a series of challenges, a study like this demonstrates how extra effort can reveal important information about hitherto uncharacterized genetic variants and the role they play in a variety of childhood and adult illnesses," said Struan F.A. Grant, PhD, Director of the Center for Spatial and Functional Genomics and the Daniel B. Burke Endowed Chair for Diabetes Research at CHOP. "This work further underscores how the brain is central to the genetics of obesity and provides us with a strategy for further study."

This study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grants F31 HD105404 and R01 HD056465, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant UM1 DK126194, and the Daniel B. Burke Endowed Chair for Diabetes Research.

• Personalized Medicine
• Diet and Weight Loss
• Diseases and Conditions
• Children's Health
• Chronic Illness
• Gene therapy
• Vector (biology)
• Anti-obesity drug
• Head injury
• Molecular biology
• Hypothalamus

Story Source:

Materials provided by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia . Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference :

• Sheridan H. Littleton, Khanh B. Trang, Christina M. Volpe, Kieona Cook, Nicole DeBruyne, Jean Ann Maguire, Mary Ann Weidekamp, Kenyaita M. Hodge, Keith Boehm, Sumei Lu, Alessandra Chesi, Jonathan P. Bradfield, James A. Pippin, Stewart A. Anderson, Andrew D. Wells, Matthew C. Pahl, Struan F.A. Grant. Variant-to-function analysis of the childhood obesity chr12q13 locus implicates rs7132908 as a causal variant within the 3′ UTR of FAIM2 . Cell Genomics , 2024; 100556 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100556

Cite This Page :

Explore More

• Anticoagulant With an On-Off Switch
• Sleep Resets Brain Connections -- At First
• Far-Reaching Effects of Exercise
• Hidden Connections Between Brain and Body
• Novel Genetic Plant Regeneration Approach
• Early Human Occupation of China
• Journey of Inhaled Plastic Particle Pollution
• Earth-Like Environment On Ancient Mars
• A 'Cosmic Glitch' in Gravity
• Time Zones Strongly Influence NBA Results

Trending Topics

Strange & offbeat.

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS. A lock ( Lock Locked padlock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

NSF and NIH partner on internship opportunity in biomedical engineering

The U.S. National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) have initiated a joint research training opportunity through the NSF Non-Academic Research Internships for Graduate Students (NSF INTERN) program.    

The  NSF INTERN program  provides graduate students with six-month experiential learning opportunities through research internships where they acquire core professional competencies and skills. Through this collaboration, the internships will take place at the NIBIB Center for Biomedical Engineering Technology Acceleration (BETA Center).  

The NSF-NIBIB collaboration will help advance NSF’s strategic workforce development objectives as well the NIBIB’s mission to transform, through technology development, our understanding of disease and its prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment and support the next generation of diverse, interdisciplinary researchers across the career continuum.  

″Over 60% of STEM Ph.D. recipients start their careers in industry, government or nonprofit positions," said Susan Margulies, NSF assistant director for Engineering. ″This partnership between NSF and NIBIB will help equip graduate students in science and engineering with the skills to impact the future development of biotechnology in the U.S.″     

"We're thrilled to collaborate with NSF on expanding training opportunities for engineers and physical scientists in biomedical research," said Bruce Tromberg, director of NIBIB. "The BETA Center will match trainees with experts in NIH's unique clinical and laboratory facilities, forming collaborations that accelerate bioengineering innovation and technology development, an urgent national need".  

The opportunity will support research experiences at the BETA Center in areas of biomedical research. The opportunity seeks to fund approximately eight to 10 internships in Fiscal Year 2024, providing up to $55,000 per student for a six-month period.   

This activity is arranged under a five-year memorandum of understanding (MOU) established between NSF and NIBIB in 2022. The MOU enables new and stronger collaborations between research and research communities supported by NSF and NIBIB to accelerate discovery and innovation in biotechnology.   

Dear Colleague Letter

• Learn more about this funding opportunity

Research areas

• Open access
• Published: 16 May 2018

A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students

• Karen A. Blotnicky 1 ,
• Tamara Franz-Odendaal 2 ,
• Frederick French 3 &
• Phillip Joy 4  

International Journal of STEM Education volume  5 , Article number:  22 ( 2018 ) Cite this article

128k Accesses

115 Citations

13 Altmetric

Metrics details

A sample of 1448 students in grades 7 and 9 was drawn from public schools in Atlantic Canada to explore students’ knowledge of science and mathematics requirements for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) careers. Also explored were their mathematics self-efficacy (MSE), their future career interests, their preferences for particular career activities, and their likelihood to pursue a STEM career.

Analysis revealed that while older students had more knowledge about mathematics/science requirements for STEM careers, this knowledge was lacking overall. Also, students with higher MSE were more knowledgeable about STEM career requirements. Furthermore, students with higher MSE and STEM career knowledge were more likely to choose a STEM career. Students with greater interest in technical and scientific skills were also more likely to consider a STEM career than those who preferred career activities that involved practical, productive, and concrete activities.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that students in middle school have a limited STEM career knowledge with respect to subject requirements and with respect to what sort of activities these careers involve. Furthermore, students with low MSE have a declining interest in STEM careers. Our data thus support the need to improve access to knowledge to facilitate students’ understanding of STEM careers and the nature of STEM work. Exposure of students to STEM careers can enhance their interest in pursuing careers involving science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Globally, youth vary considerably in their level of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career knowledge, their career interests, and their intentions of pursuing a STEM career. STEM career knowledge, defined as a student’s familiarity with a particular STEM career, varies considerably based on the school’s STEM career guidance. The level of STEM career knowledge an individual has will directly affect one’s intentions of pursuing a STEM career in the future (Compeau 2016 ; Nugent et al. 2015 ; Zhang and Barnett 2015 ). Without adequate knowledge, there is a risk that students will dismiss a STEM-based career path as a potential option for their future. Consequently, student interest in a particular STEM career will wane, which will negatively influence their desire to participate in activities that serve to increase STEM career knowledge and awareness. Indeed, interventions have shown that equipping students with STEM career knowledge early increases their motivation to take more science and mathematics courses in high school (Harackiewicz et al. 2012 ).

Students’ career interest and their preferred future career activities will also affect their intention of pursuing a STEM career. A key predictor of STEM career interest at the end of high school is interest at the start of high school (Sadler et al. 2012 ). However, the positive attitudes towards science identified in youth age 10 sharply declines by age 14 (Murphy and Beggs 2005 ; Tai et al. 2006 ); the junior high school years are typically ages 12–14 years. An extensive study in 2015, surveying 24,000 students, showed that occupational intentions change dramatically between the 9th and 11th grade and that the relationship between STEM intention and motivation is highly time-sensitive (Mangu et al. 2015 ).

Both STEM career knowledge and career interests are also influenced by society at large. These society influencers include role models that students are exposed to either in person or through the media, the individual students interact with on a daily basis such as teachers, family members, and peers, as well as students’ extracurricular experiences (Dabney et al. 2012 ; Harackiewicz et al. 2012 ; Nugent et al. 2015 ; Sahin et al. 2014 ; Sahin et al. 2015 ; Schumacher et al. 2009 ; Sjaastad 2012 ; Steinke et al. 2009 ; Zhang and Barnett 2015 ). Collectively, these influencing factors predict the self-efficacy (i.e., one’s belief in one’s ability) youth hold about their career options as well as their outcome expectancies (Mangu et al. 2015 ). Self-efficacy is considered a major predictor guiding the selection of majors during high school and post-secondary education (Heilbronner 2009 ; Kelly et al. 2013 ).

The grades 7 through 9 years (12–15-year-olds) are the key time period for influencing STEM career interest and for building this self-efficacy with respect to mathematics and science. Thus, it is during the junior high (middle) school age that a student’s beliefs about competency and interests begin to solidify (Simpkins et al. 2006 ). It is at this time that student engagement activities and career knowledge should be at its highest. Social cognitive career theory (Lent 2005 ) acknowledges and hypothesizes that career interests, choice, and personal goals form a complex human agency process that includes performance, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. For example, self-efficacy is positively related to student academic performance and science self-efficacy has been shown to impact student selection of science-related activities, which impacts their ultimate success and helps maintain interests (Britner and Pajares 2006 ; Parker et al. 2014 ; Richardson et al. 2012 ).

Early interest in STEM topics is an excellent predictor for later learning and eventual career interests and choice (DeBacker and Nelson 1999 ). Contextual and individual variables influence these social cognitive variables including factors such as parental, teacher, and peer cultural expectations (Lent et al. 1994 ). Nugent et al. ( 2015 ) found support for the social cognitive career theory (Lent et al. 1994 ) as a framework for examining STEM learning and career orientation outcomes by providing a way in which to view the socio-contextual, motivational, and instructional factors that can impact youth STEM interests.

Although 88% of parents believe they can help guide their children’s learning, less than 28% actually discuss the value of a STEM education with their children (“Let’s Talk Science Canada Annual Report,” 2015 ). Recent studies have also indicated that junior high students have an unclear view about engineering (Compeau 2016 ; Karatas et al. 2011 ) and science (Masnick et al. 2010 ) yet these are critical years in which to build STEM interest. The present paper builds on our previous study (Franz-Odendaal et al. 2016 ) and explores students’ knowledge of STEM career mathematics/science requirements and their mathematics self-efficacy (MSE) and how these shape students’ career interests and preferred career activities. Differences among grade 7 and 9 students with respect to career interests and activities, and the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career will be examined. While gender differences are important because STEM stereotypes are heavily biased towards males, these differences are beyond the scope of the current study. This study will examine who, what, and how youth are influenced in STEM career choice.

This study captured five main areas of interest: student knowledge of mathematics and science requirements that lead to STEM careers, MSE, career interests, career activity preferences, and their correlation with the likelihood to consider pursuing a STEM career among youth. Based on the literature, the following research questions were developed to guide this research.

RQ1: What is the correlation between grade level and students’ knowledge of high school requirements for STEM careers?

RQ2: What is the correlation between MSE and students’ knowledge of high school requirements for STEM careers?

RQ3: What is the correlation between MSE and students’ career interests and/or their preference for particular career activities?

RQ4: What is the association between student preferences for career interests and preferred career activities with grade level?

RQ5: What are the relationships between the following factors and the likelihood that students will choose a STEM career: grade level, MSE, student knowledge of mathematics/science requirements for post-secondary study for STEM careers, career interests and preferred career activities?

These research questions have not been explored in the context of Atlantic Canada, thus making this study relevant to the education system within Canada and globally.

Grade 7 and 9 students in the four Canadian Atlantic provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland) completed an online survey during their school hours. This research was approved by the university research ethics board. Permission to collect data in the schools was obtained from school board superintendents and parents. Schools were purposefully chosen from school families in geographic areas across Atlantic Canada. English and French language schools were included in the study. Data were weighted to ensure that the sample was representative by grade level, from each of the four Atlantic provinces. A total sample size of 1448 students was obtained across all four provinces in Atlantic Canada: New Brunswick (33%), Nova Scotia (38.4%), Prince Edward Island (6.5%), and Newfoundland-Labrador (22.1%). The sample was split almost evenly between grade 7 (48%) and grade 9 (52%). The sample was balanced with respect to gender (58% female to 42% male). Students ranged in age from 11 to 20 years with an average age of 13.5 years and a median age of 14 years (SD = 1.1). Grade 7 students had an average age of 12.6 years (SD = .6) with a median age of 13 years. Grade 9 students had an average age of 14.5 years (SD = .6) with a median age of 14 years.

Five different measures were used in this study. These included measures of STEM career knowledge, MSE, career activity preferences, career interests, and likelihood to choose to pursue a STEM career. These measures were incorporated into the study based on earlier reviews that found that studies’ examining factors influencing career choice have been criticized for failing to account for the complexity of career choices and career decision-making (Patton and McMahon 2006 ) and for being too static in their view of career development (Hirshi 2011 ).

STEM career knowledge score

A STEM career knowledge (SCK) score was created to capture students’ knowledge about the requirements for high school mathematics and science in STEM careers. Students were presented with 12 STEM careers and asked to indicate whether they believed that the training for each of the careers required having taken mathematics or science in high school. Students could respond “yes” if they believed the career required high school mathematics or science based on their knowledge of the entrance requirements for Canadian colleges and universities. They could respond “no” if they believed that the career did not require high school mathematics or science, or they could choose “uncertain” if they were not sure that high school mathematics and/or science were required for that career. The list included careers students are commonly exposed to (such as veterinarian, pharmacist, and oral hygienist) as well as careers that are likely less familiar to them (such as mechanical engineer, geologist, and land surveyor). The list included mechanical engineer, computer hardware designer, pharmacist, medical technologist, geologist, veterinarian, oil industry engineer, physiotherapist, oral hygienist, nutritionist, land surveyor, and ophthalmologist. The list was provided to students in no particular order.

A score was calculated to capture students’ knowledge based on these responses. “Yes” responses were scored as “1,” “uncertain” responses as “0,” and “no” scored as “− 1.” The responses were then summed to obtain a basic SCK score per student. The SCK score was calculated only for students who had rated at least one third of the careers in the list. The SCK was validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis.

Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale

In an attempt to offer a more complete perspective on the process of career decision-making, Hackett and Bertz (Hackett and Betz 1981 ) drew on the work of Bandura ( 1977 ) to introduce the concept of self-efficacy to the career development literature noting its potential to help understand the complexity of career decision-making such as the underrepresentation of women in traditional male-dominated career fields. Self-efficacy referred to the belief that a person had in their own ability to successfully perform a particular behavior based on their perception of their capability and the likelihood of their achieving success in that activity.

The second measure used in this analysis was a MSE scale. Students were asked to describe their experiences in mathematics by rating each of the following statements on a scale ranging from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree: I get good grades in mathematics; I learn quickly in mathematics; I look forward to my mathematics class; I feel tense doing mathematics problems; I feel helpless doing mathematics problems. Negatively phrased items were reverse-coded to maintain consistency in the MSE scale. Students’ responses to these five statements about their experiences in mathematics were then coded into dichotomies to create five separate measures. Dichotomies were created by assigning a value of “1” to those who were most comfortable with Likert scale ratings of 4 or 5 to the statements and assigning a value of 0 to those who were less confident and comfortable with Likert scale ratings of 1 through 3. These five measures were then summed to get a single MSE scale that would reflect higher measures for those who were the most confident and comfortable with mathematics. The MSE scale was validated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The resulting MSE score ranged from 0 to 5. The MSE scale was then divided into two subgroups to create an MSE score for further analysis. The MSE score consisted of those with low MSE (scores of 0 through 3) and high MSE (scores of 4 or 5). The goal in using this breakout was to identify students who were the most comfortable and confident in their mathematics experiences.

Career activities and career interests

Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) (Lent et al. 2010 ) has continued to evolve to include person and environmental and socio-demographic variables as well as interest and career choice models. The SCCT argues that people develop interests (actively likes and dislikes) largely on the basis of their beliefs about their self-efficacy and the outcomes their efforts could achieve. Ultimately, people become interested in activities they believe they can perform well. Therefore, people develop goals to pursue academic and career activities that are consistent with their interests as well as with their self-efficacy and outcome expectations (Sheu et al. 2010 ). Thus, career activities and career interests are highly correlated. For these reasons, student ratings of self-perceptions of their career interests, and also their career activities, were included.

The SCCT has been found to support self-efficacy and outcome expectations as significant predictors of interest, that interests partially mediate the relation of self-efficacy and outcome expectations, and that self-efficacy relates to outcome expectations across Holland’s (1997) broad occupational themes as utilized in the current study (Sheu et al. 2010 ). This alignment was felt to provide a rationale for the use of student ratings of interests, activities, and Holland’s broad occupational themes as a comprehensive way of gaining insight into the complexity of career decision-making of junior high students.

Hollands’ Theory of Career Choice and Development (Holland 1973 ) focused on six basic personality types: realistic (practical); investigative (analytical, curious); artistic (expressive, original); social (working/helping others); enterprising (goal oriented); and conventional (ordered). Individuals are not limited to one personality type and many exhibit characteristics on more than one type. Holland ( 1973 ) argued that everyone has career decisions to make at various stages of their lives. As well, he argued that everyone can serve as both a coach and/or a player in those decisions depending on their role, situation, and knowledge. Reflecting on the life stage, the environment, and the knowledge one has of their own particular type of preferred approach to life plus knowledge of the interaction among a variety of factors such as the cultural, social, academic, and family influences on the decisions that each individual makes about their life career. These are not perfect, single, nor static events and depend on self and other perceptions of a wide range of factors. However, at a point in time, they represent what each person conceptualizes as a satisfying career for them. Holland ( 1973 ) argued that his theory of careers was really intended to help practitioners, researchers, and students in education and social science to address a fuller understanding of vocational choice and to be helpful in professional counseling. Miller ( 1998 ) stated that Holland’s theory can be used to help individuals explore career choices. More recently, Olitsky ( 2014 ) used Holland’s theory of career and educational choice when researching the earnings of STEM majors, indicating that the underlying theory is still relevant. Since career interests and career activities are highly correlated, they were measured separately.

The third measure used in this analysis was a ranking of the preferred career activities using Holland’s Theory of Career Choice and Development (1973). Students were asked to rank six different career activities from (1) Most favorite to (6) Least favorite. Each of the career activities was then analyzed based on the percentage of students who rated it in their top 2 favorites. The career activities studied in this research included the following: (1) artistic, unusual, and creative activities; (2) working on practical, productive, and concrete activities; (3) taking responsibility, providing leadership, and convincing others; (4) things being organized into routines and having an order; (5) learning by reading, study, analysis, or investigation; (6) helping others and being concerned for the welfare of others.

The fourth measure used in this analysis was a ranking of career interests also based on Holland’s Theory of Career Choice and Development (Holland 1973 ). Students were asked to rank six different career interests from (1) Most favorite to (6) Least favorite. Each of the career interests was then analyzed based on the percentage of students who rated it in their top 2 favorites. These interests were (1) working with people; (2) creative skills and expression; (3) technical and scientific skills; (4) manual and mechanical skills; (5) leading, persuading, and directing others; and (6) routines and adhering to standards of performance.

Likelihood to pursue a STEM career

The final measure used in this analysis was the likelihood that students would consider choosing a STEM career in their future. Students were asked how likely they would be to choose a career that is science-related (including science, engineering, health, or technology). Likelihood was measured using the following Likert scale: (1) Very unlikely, (2) Somewhat unlikely, (3) Somewhat likely, and (4) Very likely. This scale was recoded into a dichotomous variable for use in bivariate logistic regression: Students who were somewhat likely or very likely to choose a STEM career were coded as “1,” and those who were somewhat unlikely or very unlikely to choose a STEM career were coded as “0.”

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS software (IBM Corp 2013 ). Descriptive statistics were used to provide an overall analysis of the data. Various statistical tests were selected based on the level of data measurement and data distributions (McDaniel et al. 2014 ; Hair Jr. et al. 2010 ). t tests were used to explore differences in average ratings between groups. Chi-square was used to analyze associations between nominal and ordinal variables. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate significant differences between average ratings and measures involving categorical variables with more than two response levels (McDaniel et al. 2014 ). Logistic regression was used to explore research questions involving interval and ratio-scaled variables (Hair Jr. et al. 2010 ). Brown-Forsyth exact tests were used with ANOVA to compensate for violations of homogeneity of variance (IBM Corp 2013 ). Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to detect significant differences between groups for significant ANOVA results (IBM Corp 2013 ; Hair Jr. et al. 2010 ). Data were weighted to reflect the population of students by grade level and province across Atlantic Canada.

Bivariate logistic regression was conducted to explore the relative contribution of the following factors on the likelihood that students would choose a STEM career: SCK score, MSE score, grade level, career interests, and career activities. Grade level, career interest, and career activities were coded as dichotomies for the regression analysis as follows: grade level (grade 9 = 1, grade 7 = 0), career interests (rated in top 2 favorites = 1, not rated in top 2 favorites = 0), career activities (rated in top 2 favorites = 1, not rated in top 2 favorites = 0).

Three regressions were created to explore the research questions. The first analysis regressed grade level, SCK score, and MSE score against the likelihood to pursue a STEM career. Two more regressions were conducted: one to regress career activities and a second to regress career interests against the likelihood to pursue a STEM career as a dependent variable. Measures for career activity and career interests showed a high level of multicollinearity between the two sets of variables. Separating these predictors into two different regressions eliminated problems with multicollinearity.

We first describe the results for each of the measures used in this study and then answer our research questions (RQ1–5).

Student knowledge of mathematics and science requirements for STEM careers

We assessed student’s knowledge of high school requirements for STEM careers, by asking students to indicate whether a career required mathematics and/or science (Table  1 ). Mechanical engineer was noted by 71.4% of students as having a high school mathematics/science requirement. Two careers (land surveyor and ophthalmologist) were noted by less than half of the students as requiring high school mathematics or science. Five careers were classified as requiring mathematics and science by 65.6 to 68.2% (veterinarian, geologist, medical technologist, pharmacist, computer hardware engineer). Four of the careers were listed as requiring mathematics and science by 51.8 to 58.6% of the students (nutritionist, oral hygienist, physiotherapist, oil industry engineer). What is notable in the students’ responses are that most students seemed confident of their career classification in that they answered “yes” or “no” and not the option of “uncertain,” indicating that they were confident in their choice. The percentage of students saying that they were uncertain if a career required mathematics or science for post-secondary study was low and ranged from 12.5 to 32.6% across all of the careers with half of the uncertain responses ranging from 12.5 to 13% of students. Table  1 shows the results of high school mathematics/science requirements for STEM careers.

Students’ responses were summed to obtain an overall SCK score. A factor analysis of the career ratings was used to ensure it was unidimensional, and reliability of the score was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. The confirmatory factor analysis was statistically significant (KMO = .961, p  < .01). Cronbach’s alpha was .95 which meets the criterion for reliability.

The SCK score ranged from − 12 to + 12, with an average score of 4.6 (SD = 7.6; Fig.  1 ). The average SCK score was low, indicating a lack of familiarity with the mathematics and/or science requirements of STEM careers. Approximately 8% of students did not correctly classify any of the careers as having a high school mathematics and/or science requirement. Only 36.4% of students had high SCK scores having correctly classified 10 to 12 careers. The top quartile of students scored 11 or better while the bottom quartile scored 0 or less than 0 out of the 12-point score. A summary of the SCK score is in Fig.  1 .

STEM career knowledge (SCK) score

Overall, these results suggest that STEM career knowledge is limited among middle school students. Results also reveal that students seem to be unaware of their limited knowledge regarding STEM career preparation.

Students’ mathematics self-efficacy

In order to determine whether MSE was correlated with students STEM career knowledge (RQ2) and/or between MSE and career interests and/or preferred career activities (RQ3), we first determined the MSE scale for the cohort. The MSE scale ranged from 0 (No self-efficacy) to 5 (High self-efficacy). The distribution of the Math Self-Efficacy Scale is shown in Fig.  2 .

Mathematics Self-Efficacy (MSE) Scale

A confirmatory factor analysis of the measures in the MSE scale indicated that it was unidimensional and reliable. The factor analysis was statistically significant (KMO = .698, p  < .01). Cronbach’s alpha was .72 which is acceptable for a scale analysis. These results suggest that over half of the students had a relatively high MSE and about one third of students had low MSE.

Career activities and interests

In order to assess students’ preferred career activities and their career interests, students were asked to select their favorites. Students were presented with a list of six career activities and asked to indicate which activities were in their top 2 favorites. These measures were recoded into dichotomies for further analysis. There was a very even spread of students rating career activities in their top 2 favorites, ranging from 32.1 to 45.9%. Most of the activities were listed in their top 2 favorites by about one third of the students. The results revealed that artistic, unusual, and creative activities were most commonly listed in the top 2 favorite career activities. The career activity with the lowest rating was helping others and being concerned for their welfare. The results are summarized in Table  2 .

Students were also presented with a list of six career interests and asked to indicate which career interests were in their top 2 favorites. These measures were recoded into dichotomies for further analysis. The percentage of students rating career interests as their top 2 favorites ranged from 21.9% for routines and adhering to standards to working with people at 49.8%. The results are summarized in Table  3 .

Likelihood of choosing a STEM career

Next, we assessed whether students were interested in pursuing a STEM career. Nearly 70% percent of students surveyed revealed that they were either somewhat likely or very likely to pursue a STEM career. On a scale of (1) Very unlikely to (4) Very likely, an average rating of 2.9/4 indicated that students were somewhat likely to pursue a STEM career. The results appear in Table  4 .

The association of grade level and STEM career knowledge

The first research question (RQ1) explored the correlation of grade level and STEM career knowledge. There was a statistically significant difference in the average SCK score by grade, with grade 9 students scoring higher than grade 7 students (5.7 vs 3.3, t  = − 5.69, df = 1209.7, p  < .01). While it is good to see that students appear to acquire more knowledge of STEM career requirements in middle school grades, it is concerning that students in grade 9 still had a low average SCK score since this is the year in which students begin to choose subject classes in Atlantic Canada. This indicates that more work is needed to ensure students have the correct information about STEM career requirements in time for them to make informed decisions about high school course selection.

Correlation between mathematics self-efficacy and the STEM career knowledge

The second research question (RQ2) focused on whether there is a correlation between students with higher MSE and knowledge of STEM career requirements. An analysis of variance revealed that students with high self-efficacy (MSE scale = 4 and 5) had significantly higher SCK scores than students who did not score as highly in the MSE scale (BF = 8.7, df = 5, p  < .01). Students with high MSE had a SCK score of 6.6 out of 12, while students with lower MSE scores had average SCK scores ranging from 2.8 to 4.8. The results are shown in Table  5 .

These results for RQ2 show that students who report more confidence and comfort in mathematics tend to be more knowledgeable about mathematics/science requirements for STEM careers. This is a correlation only and cannot be interpreted as a causal relationship since survey data cannot be used to measure causality.

Correlation between mathematics self-efficacy and students’ preferred career activities and their career interests

Our third research question (RQ3) explored whether there was a correlation between MSE and students’ career interests and preferred career activity. There were statistically significant differences by students’ preferred career activities for the MSE scale. MSE scale totals were sorted into two groups to create an MSE score for further analysis. Those with low MSE scale totals (0 through 3) were assigned an MSE score of 0, and those with high MSE scale totals (4 and 5) were assigned an MSE score of 1. A chi-square analysis revealed that only one career activity differed significantly based on students’ MSE scores. Reading, study, analysis, and investigation was listed in the top 2 favorites for career activities by 36.5% of students who had high MSE scores (between 4 and 5) when compared to 28.4% of students with low MSE (0 through 3) ( χ 2  = 7.979, df = 1, p  < .01). The remaining career activities did not differ significantly based on students’ MSE. The results are summarized in Table  6 .

These results show that most of the preferred career activities had no correlation at all with MSE scores. However, reading, study, analysis, and investigation are the hallmarks of a mathematics-, science-, or technology-based activity. Therefore, it is reasonable that students who are confident and comfortable with mathematics would also enjoy reading, study, analysis, and investigation.

In order to explore whether there is a correlation between MSE and student’s career interests, a chi-square analysis was conducted. The chi-square analysis revealed that only one career interest differed significantly based on students’ MSE score. This career interest was technical and scientific skills. This career interest was listed in the top 2 favorites for career activities by 43.8% of students with high MSE score (between 4 and 5) compared to 36.0% of students with low MSE score (0 through 3) ( χ 2  = 6.558, df = 1, p  = .01). The remaining career interests did not differ significantly based on students’ MSE scores. As with the results for career activities, these results show that most of the career interests were not significantly correlated with MSE and all of the career interests were rated in the top 2 favorites by less than half of the students. It is reasonable that students who are confident and comfortable with mathematics would also be interested in careers involving technical and scientific skills. The results are summarized in Table  7 .

The correlation between grade level and students’ career interests and preferred career activities

The fourth research question (RQ4) addressed whether grade level was associated with student preferences for career interests and activities. There were statistically significant differences by grade regarding some of the career interests, thereby satisfying the first part of the fourth research question. More grade 7 than grade 9 students listed manual and mechanical skills in their top 2 favorites (36.5 vs 29.4%, χ 2  = 6.84, df = 1, p  < .01), as well as creative skills and expression (45.4 vs 37.0%, χ 2  = 8.73, df = 1, p  < .01). More grade 9 than grade 7 students ranked “working with people” in their top 2 favorites (52.8 vs 46.8%, χ 2  = 4.21, df = 1, p  < .05). These results are summarized in Table  8 .

More grade 7 than grade 9 students listed practical, productive, and concrete activities in their top 2 favorites (42.1 vs 34.7%; χ 2  = 6.9, df = 1, p  < .01). More grade 9 than grade 7 students rated helping others and being concerned for their welfare in their top 2 favorite career activities (34.9 vs 28.6%; χ 2  = 5.4, df = 1, p  < .05) as well as having things organized into routines and having order (39.4 vs 29.4%; χ 2  = 13.2, df = 1, p < .01). There were no statistically significant differences by grade level for the other career activities studied.

This trend is similar to that emerging in the analysis of career interests. In general, students in the higher grade focused more on activities involving helping others and being less attracted to careers that involved practical applications or routines. The results are summarized in Table  9 .

The correlations between students’ STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, and grade level on their likelihood to choose a STEM career

The fifth research question (RQ5) focused on how several aspects might relate to students’ likelihood of choosing a STEM career. These areas included grade level, MSE, knowledge of STEM careers, and preferences for various career interests and activities.

First, a logistic regression was conducted to determine whether or not grade level, STEM knowledge, and MSE score were associated with students’ likelihood to pursue a STEM career. The hypothesized regression model was likelihood of choosing a STEM career (ODDS) =  f (grade level, STEM knowledge score, MSE score). A test of the full regression model against an intercept-only model was statistically significant ( χ 2  = 76.85, df = 3, p  < .01). The regression was strong with a McFadden’s R 2  = .85.

The regression analysis correctly classified 70.6% of all cases and 95.3% of those who were likely to choose a STEM career. The regression revealed that students with stronger SCK scores were marginally more likely to pursue a STEM career than were students with weaker SCK scores (odds ratio = 1.04, probability = .51). However, students with high MSE scores were 1.3 times more likely to pursue a STEM career than were those who had lower MSE scores (probability = .56). Grade level was not a statistically significant predictor of the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career.

These results showed that students’ knowledge of STEM careers and their self-efficacy in mathematics were statistically significant factors in the likelihood that they would pursue a STEM career, while STEM career knowledge was a modest contributor. Also, students in grade 9 were not more likely to pursue a STEM career than were students in Grade 7. However, research has shown that occupational intentions change dramatically between 9th and 11th grades and the relationship between STEM intention and motivation is very time-sensitive (Mangu et al. 2015 , p.55). The results are summarized in Table  10 .

These regression results reveal that individual student characteristics, MSE, and SCK are better predictors of the likelihood to pursue STEM careers than student grade level. Individual strengths and weaknesses, as well as students’ knowledge and competency, are better indicators of future career paths than grade level.

The correlation between students’ career interests and their likelihood to pursue a STEM career

A second logistic regression was conducted to explore whether or not students’ preferred career interests was correlated with their likelihood to pursue a STEM career. Six career interests were explored in the analysis. The hypothesized regression model was likelihood of choosing a STEM career (ODDS) =  f (manual and mechanical skills; technical and scientific skills; creative skills and expression; working with people; leading, persuading, and directing others; routines and adhering to standards). A test of the full regression model against an intercept-only model was statistically significant ( χ 2  = 119.94, df = 6, p  < .01). The regression was reasonably strong with a McFadden’s R 2  = .73. The regression analysis correctly classified 72% of all cases and 96.6% of those who were likely to choose a STEM career.

The regression revealed that students who rated technical and scientific skills in their top 2 favorite career interests were 5.4 times more likely to pursue a STEM career (probability = .84). Students who rated working with people in their top 2 favorites were 1.5 times more likely to pursue a STEM career (probability = .61). Students who rated creative and expressive skills in their top 2 favorite career interests were less likely to pursue a STEM career than those who rated creative and expressive skills highly. Their odds of pursuing a STEM career were only .70 of those who did not rate creativity and expressiveness among their favorite career interests. Their probability of pursuing a STEM career was .41. The remaining career interests were not statistically significant predictors of the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career (manual or mechanical skills; leading, persuading, or directing others; routines and adhering to standards). These results provide evidence for the fifth research question in that three out of the six career interests measured did have a statistically significant correlation with the likelihood that a student would consider pursuing a STEM career. The results are summarized in Table  11 .

These results indicate that student preference for technical and scientific skills and careers involving working with people enhance the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career, while students who prefer careers involving creative skills and expression are less likely to do so. While a focus group could better explore the students’ preferences for creativity and creative careers, this level of detail is not possible in large sample survey-based research and is outside of the scope of this study. Other career interests that focus on mechanical, manual, or routine activities, or those involving leadership, do not predict the likelihood of students pursuing a STEM career and are not significantly correlated with STEM career choice.

A third logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine whether students’ career activity preferences were correlated whether or not they were likely to pursue a STEM career. Six career activities were explored in the analysis. The hypothesized regression model was likelihood of choosing a STEM career (ODDS) = f (practical, productive, concrete activities; reading, study, analysis, and investigation; artistic, unusual, and creative activities; taking responsibility, providing leadership, and convincing; and helping others and being concerned for their welfare). A test of the full regression model against an intercept-only model was statistically significant ( χ 2  = 32.883, df = 6, p  < .01). The regression was reasonably strong with a McFadden’s R 2  = .78. The regression analysis correctly classified 72% of all cases, and 100% of those who were likely to choose a STEM career.

The regression revealed that students who preferred career activities involving reading, study, analysis, and investigation were 1.8 times more likely to pursue a STEM career (probability = .65) than those who did not prefer such activities. Students’ rating career activities involving routines and having an order were 1.5 times more likely (probability = .60) to pursue a STEM career than those who did not prefer such activities, while students with preferences for practical, productive, and concrete career activities were 1.5 times more likely to pursue a STEM career (probability = .60) compared to those who did not prefer such activities. The remaining career activities were not statistically significant predictors of the likelihood to pursue a STEM career (artistic, unusual, and creative activities; taking responsibility, providing leadership, and convincing others; helping others and being concerned for their welfare). These results revealed three out of the six career activities measured did have a statistically significant correlation with the likelihood that a student would consider pursuing a STEM career. The results are summarized in Table  12 .

These results stand in contrast to those for students’ career interests and the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career. Unlike the career interest analysis, students seeking routine career activities are more likely to pursue a STEM career. Also, students who ranked career interests involving helping others were more likely to pursue STEM careers, but this analysis showed that student preference for career activities involving helping others and being concerned for their welfare was not a statistically significant indicator of their likelihood to pursue a STEM career. Further, these results differ somewhat in terms of students’ preferences for practical activities. While career interests involving manual or mechanical skills were not statistical indicators of the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career, career activities involving practical, productive, and concrete activities were statistically significant. The career activity involving reading, study, analysis, and investigation was also statistically linked to students’ likelihood to pursue a STEM career, which seems reasonable given that such activities are at the heart of many STEM careers.

Youth vary widely in their career knowledge, interest, and intentions. Factors investigated in the present study examined STEM career knowledge, MSE, career activities, career interests, and the likelihood of students to pursue a STEM career.

Knowledge and self-efficacy

Results of the present study align with recent findings by Compeau et al. ( 2016 ), Nugent et al. ( 2015 ), and Zhang and Barnett ( 2015 ) show that self-efficacy along with knowledge of STEM careers are significant factors in whether or not adolescents pursue STEM careers. Findings also indicated that career knowledge is limited among middle school students and students seem to be unaware of their limited knowledge regarding STEM preparation. While approximately 70% of students reported that mathematics was an important requirement for a career in mechanical engineering, computer hardware design, and pharmacy, 50% or less were aware that it was also important in careers for ophthalmology, land surveyor, nutrition, and oral hygienist.

The issue of self-efficacy takes on particular significance as students progress through high school. Previous research by Murphy and Beggs ( 2005 ), Heilbronner ( 2009 ), and Mangu et al. ( 2015 ) have noted how young women have a lower self-efficacy in STEM during high school years. Previous research has also shown that interest in STEM and motivation to pursue STEM activities tends to wane over time for all high school students. The results of the current study agree with earlier findings that lower levels of MSE exist; we found approximately 34% of participants had low MSE scale totals. These findings raise concerns about the combined effects of students’ low MSE and their declining interest in STEM from early through to later grades and on the numbers of graduating high school students who will be inclined to choose a STEM career.

Results of the current study demonstrated that students in grades 7 and 9 had a broad range of favorite career activities with the majority (approximately 46%) stating that their strongest preference was for artistic and creative types of activities. Also, all of the possible activities were selected by at least one third of the group. Interestingly, approximately 50% of participants selected their career interest as being “working with people,” but relative to career activities, only one third of participants selected “helping people.” However, this is not surprising given that one can have an interest but may not want to have a career working in that activity. For example, one may be interested in art, but have no interest, or lack sufficient talent, to pursue a career in the field (Holland 1973 ). Also, middle school students may not be able to discriminate between the nuances between career activities and interests in the way that older students and young adults would. Although a focus group study may be able to further elucidate this issue, this is beyond the scope of the current study.

Working with others and participating in creative types of activities are important findings that relate to current issues in education in Canada. A recent study (Ayar and Yalvac 2016 ) found that many STEM careers are team-based, creative, and require technical, scientific, and problem solving skills. However, in Canada, many post-secondary programs continue to focus more on memorizing and replicating science content knowledge. Further study of this possible implication would be worthwhile.

While approximately 70% of participants stated they were likely to choose a STEM career, 30% were less likely to do so. Not all students have the financial means to pursue a career interest. In addition, career interest and motivation are highly time sensitive (Mangu et al. 2015 , p.55). Considering findings from studies such as Ayar and Yalvac ( 2016 ), as well as what we know about the decline in interest in STEM careers as students mature, these results suggest that there is room for increasing awareness, STEM career interest, and providing for better knowledge acquisition in the area of STEM careers. As well, our data suggests that alternative ways of teaching and evaluating STEM courses should be considered. Perhaps a greater emphasis on authentic means of teaching and evaluating STEM content that involves collaboration, problem solving, and application of STEM knowledge might serve to engage learners in more meaningful ways, thereby enabling continued motivation and interest in STEM careers as students progress through secondary and post-secondary education. Does a higher MSE lead students to consider pursuing STEM careers and lead them to becoming more informed about the career requirements or do students who have higher knowledge of STEM careers become more competent in mathematics? Are these factors simply correlational and reflect students who are high in both measures or low in both measures? While these questions cannot be answered in this research, it is interesting to note that MSE may play a role, or be a leading indicator, for STEM career knowledge.

Influence of mathematics self-efficacy on career knowledge, interest and activities

Our results indicate that while there is a relationship between career knowledge and MSE, we did not find a relationship among career interests or activities with MSE. The assumption that having a positive sense of mathematics skill would correlate with STEM career interests and activities was not supported. Follow-up research involving interviews with participants about their understanding of career interests, activities, and MSE, would provide more an in-depth understanding. Based on findings by Simpkins et al. ( 2006 ) it was expected that there would be a relationship among interests, activities and MSE as their findings indicated that in junior high beliefs about competency and interests begin to solidify. Further research may help to uncover reasons for not seeing such a correlation in this analysis.

Influence of grade level on STEM career knowledge, interest, and activities

Results indicate that there were significant differences between grade 7 and grade 9 students in the present study relative to STEM career knowledge. Overall, students in grade 9 were more knowledgeable than grade 7 students about STEM careers. The differences formed an interesting and consistent pattern that more grade 7 students expressed interest in manual and mechanical skills than grade 9 students who tended to have more interest in working with people. Further, more grade 7 students expressed interests in practical and concrete types of activities while more grade 9 students expressed interests in helping people and being concerned for their welfare. Reasons for this shift are not clearly understood. As noted by Lent ( 2005 ), career interest, choice, and personal goals form a complex chain involving performance, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. As well, socio-cultural factors also need to be considered along with opportunity for exposure (Fouad and Smith 1996 ; Kuncel et al. 2005 ; Lent et al. 1994 ). As with the relationship among self-efficacy, knowledge, interests, and activities, in-depth research involving student interviews may result in greater understanding of the reasons for these shifts and their impact on later careers.

Factors influencing positive statements involving the likelihood of choosing a STEM career

Regression analyses revealed that participants with stronger STEM career knowledge were slightly more likely to pursue a STEM career and that students with higher MSE scores were also slightly more likely to choose a STEM career. Also, grade level was not a differentiating factor, which was anticipated given the small distance between the experiences of grade 7 versus grade 9 students. As noted in many previous studies (Lent et al. 1994 ; Kuncel et al. 2005 ), knowledge of STEM careers and self-efficacy in mathematics are statistically significant factors in the likelihood that participants will pursue STEM careers.

Interest in technical and scientific skills is a strong predictor of the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career with those who indicated a preference for technical and scientific skills being 5.4 times more likely to indicate the likelihood of choosing a STEM career compared to those who rated working with people as their stronger interest. Indeed, preferences for practical, productive, and concrete activities also indicated a stronger likelihood of pursuing STEM careers than those who do not prefer such activities. Implications of these findings point to improving methods for providing information on the skills and nature of the work in STEM careers particularly in fields such as engineering and technology (which have an important focus on team work, problem solving, and creativity) as well as on technical and scientific skills.

Overall, results of the present study show that career knowledge is limited among middle school students and that they have a declining interest in STEM and have low MSE scores. Students are interested in careers that involve a wide variety of activities but do not appear to relate these activities to STEM careers. Our results point to the importance of finding and expanding on ways to increase authentic learning opportunities in secondary school in Atlantic Canada such that students are better able to participate in collaboration, problem solving, and the application of scientific knowledge in their classes. Such learning opportunities would ensure that students have access to more information on the actual nature of work in the STEM field and what is required to pursue these careers. This strategy would also serve as a motivator to those who are not aware that STEM careers involve people skills, creativity, and problem solving.

Abbreviations

Confirmatory factor analysis

• Mathematics self-efficacy

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Ayar, MC, & Yalvac, B. (2016). Lessons learned: authenticity, interdisciplinarity, and mentoring for STEM learning environments. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology , 4 (1), 30–43.

Article   Google Scholar  

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review , 84 , 191–215.

Britner, SL, & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 43 (5), 485–499.

Compeau, S. (2016). The calling of an engineer: High school students’ perceptions of engineering. Retrieved from http://qspace.library.queensu.ca/jspui/handle/1974/13924

Google Scholar  

Dabney, KP, Tai, RH, Almarode, JT, Miller-Friedmann, JL, Sonnert, G, Sadler, PM, Hazari, Z. (2012). Out-of-school time science activities and their association with career interest in STEM. International Journal of Science Education, Part B , 2 (1), 63–79.

DeBacker, TK, & Nelson, RM. (1999). Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 24 (2), 71–94.

Fouad, NA, & Smith, PL. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 43 (3), 338.

Franz-Odendaal, TA, Blotnicky, K, French, F, Joy, P. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of STEM subjects, careers, and engagement in STEM activities among middle school students in the maritime provinces. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education , 16 (2), 153–168.

Hackett, G, & Betz, NE. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 18 , 326–336.

Hair Jr, JF, Blacks, WC, Barry, BJ, Anderson, RE (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7/e . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Harackiewicz, JM, Rozek, CS, Hulleman, CS, Hyde, JS. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science an experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science , 956797611435530 .

Heilbronner, NN (2009). Pathways in STEM: factors affecting the retention and attrition of talented men and women from the STEM pipeline . ERIC Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED513162 .

Hirshi, A. (2011). Career-choice readiness in adolescence: developmental trajectories and individual differences. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 79 , 340–348.

Holland, JL (1973). Making vocational choices: a theory of careers . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Karatas, FO, Micklos, A, Bodner, GM. (2011). Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology , 20 (2), 123–135.

Kelly, K, Dampier, DA, Carr, K. (2013). Willing, able, and unwanted: high school girl’s potential selves in computing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering , 19 (1) Retrieved from http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,2d4a5d286768c212,26d9b12a206d2bc6.html .

Kuncel, NR, Credé, M, Thomas, LL. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research , 75 (1), 63–82.

Lent, R. W. (2005). A Social Cognitive View of Career Development and Counseling. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2004-21312-005

Lent, RW, Brown, SD, Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 45 (1), 79–122.

Lent, RW, Paixao, MA, da Silva, JT, Leitao, LM. (2010). Predicting occupational interest and choice aspirations in Portuguese high school students: a test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 76 , 244–251.

Let's Talk Science Annual Report. Spotlight on Science Learning - Exploring Parental Influence: Shaping Teen Decisions Regarding Science Education. (2015). Retrieved from http://letstalkscience.ca/Portals/0/Documents/RPS/Spotlight/LTS-Exploring-parental-influence-EN.pdf

Mangu, DM, Lee, AR, Middleton, JA, Nelson, JK (2015). Motivational factors predicting STEM and engineering career intentions for high school students. In Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE , (pp. 1–8). IEEE Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7344065 .

Masnick, AM, Valenti, SS, Cox, BD, Osman, CJ. (2010). A multidimensional scaling analysis of students’ attitudes about science careers. International Journal of Science Education , 32 (5), 653–667.

McDaniel, C, Gates, R, Sivaramakrishnan, S, Main, K (2014). Marketing research essentials , 2/ce (). Mississauga, ON: Wiley & Sons Canada.

Miller, MJ. (1998). Broading the use of Holland’s hexagon with specific implications for career counselors. Journal of Employment Counseling , 35 , 2–5.

Murphy, C, & Beggs, J. (2005). Coteaching as an approach to enhance science learning and teaching in primary schools. Counterpoints , 294 , 207–231.

Nugent, G, Barker, B, Welch, G, Grandgenett, N, Wu, C, Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education , 37 (7), 1067–1088.

Olitsky, NH. (2014). How do academic achievement and gender affect the earnings of STEM majors? A propensity score matching approach. Research in Higher Education , 55 , 245–271.

Parker, PD, Marsh, HW, Ciarrochi, J, Marshall, S, Abduljabbar, AS. (2014). Juxtaposing math self efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology , 34 (1), 29–48.

Patton, W, & McMahon, M (2006). Career development and systems theory , (2nd ed., ). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Richardson, M, Abraham, C, Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin , 138 (2), 353.

Sadler, PM, Sonnert, G, Hazari, Z, Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study. Science Education , 96 (3), 411–427.

Sahin, A, Ayar, MC, Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice , 14 (1), 309–322.

Sahin, A, Gulacar, O, Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education , 45 (6), 785–805.

Schumacher, MM, Stansbury, KN, Johnson, MN, Floyd, SR, Reid, CE, Noland, MP, Leukefeld, CG. (2009). The young women in science program: a five-year follow-up of an intervention to change science attitudes, academic behavior, and career aspirations. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering , 15 (4) Retrieved from http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,293840bd7415e516,4ac4cd3d67f80a79.html .

Sheu, HB, Lent, RW, Brown, SD, Miller, MJ, Hennessy, KD, Duggy, RD. (2010). Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: a meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 76 , 252–264.

Simpkins, SD, Davis-Kean, PE, Eccles, JS. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology , 42 (1), 70.

Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: the role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education , 34 (10), 1615–1636.

Steinke, J, Lapinski, M, Long, M, Van Der Maas, C, Ryan, L, Applegate, B. (2009). Seeing oneself as a Scientist: media influences and adolescent girl’s science career-possible selves. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering , 15 (4) Retrieved from http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,293840bd7415e516,0b5caaa338bc00a0.html .

Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Life Sciences, 1, 0–2.

Zhang, L, & Barnett, M. (2015). How high school students envision their STEM career pathways. Cultural Studies of Science Education , 10 (3), 637–656.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided to author by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to the individuals who helped our team obtain parental consent forms and parents for providing consent for the children to participate in this study.

Availability of data and materials

University ethics approval does not include release of the raw data. Data was collected from minor-aged children under the strict condition of anonymity and cannot be shared. Please contact the corresponding author for more information.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Business Administration and Tourism and Hospitality Management, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada

Karen A. Blotnicky

Department of Biology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada

Tamara Franz-Odendaal

Department of Education, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada

Frederick French

School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada

Phillip Joy

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The second author conceptualized the broad goals of the study, and all four authors were part of a research team that designed all the study components and executed the research. The first author was primarily responsible for designing the methodology and quantitative data analysis, while the fourth author assisted with the data analysis. The second and third authors were primarily responsible for conducting the literature review, developing the theoretical underpinnings of the research, and interpreting the results of the analysis from a theoretical perspective. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen A. Blotnicky .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This approval was granted by the Research Ethics Board of Mount Saint Vincent University in Halifax, NS Canada.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Blotnicky, K.A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F. et al. A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. IJ STEM Ed 5 , 22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

Download citation

Received : 28 July 2017

Accepted : 24 April 2018

Published : 16 May 2018

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• STEM career
• Technical skills
• Career knowledge
• Career awareness
• Career interests
• Career activities
• Subject requirements