research and innovation interview questions

Interview Questions for Research and Development Specialists (with Top Questions and Answers)

Mastering the Art of Job Interviews for interview questions for research and development specialists: Job Interview Examples and Insights

Research and development (R&D) specialists play a crucial role in the innovation and progression of various industries. Their expertise in identifying opportunities, conducting thorough research, and developing novel solutions contributes significantly to an organization's growth and competitive edge. This comprehensive guide equips aspiring R&D specialists with essential insights, practical interview preparation tips, top questions and answers, and invaluable do’s and don’ts to ace the process and carve a successful career path.

What hiring managers seek in a research and development specialist

In-depth analysis.

To excel as a research and development specialist, you must have a profound understanding of emerging trends, technological advancements, and the competitive landscape. Staying abreast of the latest industry innovations and understanding their implications is pivotal in this role. Your adeptness in conducting in-depth market research, analyzing trends, and identifying potential areas for development is highly sought after by hiring managers.

Versatility and Resourcefulness

Hiring managers seek candidates who exhibit versatility and resourcefulness, allowing them to navigate complexities and ensure seamless R&D operations. With a blend of analytical thinking and an innovative mindset, professionals in this role can proactively address challenges and capitalize on new opportunities, demonstrating their value in propelling the organization forward.

Vision and Innovation

Visionaries who can envision the future while orchestrating innovative solutions are highly coveted as they drive organizations towards sustained growth and success. Hiring managers look for individuals with a clear vision and a natural inclination for innovation, enabling them to shape groundbreaking strategies and spearhead impactful R&D initiatives.

Nurturing your preparation for a research and development specialist interview

Embarking on a successful career as a Research and Development Specialist demands strategic preparations for interviews, ensuring that you present yourself as the ideal match for the role.

Research and Familiarization

Before the interview, immerse yourself in comprehensive research about the company, its recent achievements, ongoing projects, and potential areas of growth. Gain insights into the organization’s R&D efforts, recent innovations, and possible challenges they aim to address. Understanding the company's culture and strategic initiatives will empower you to align your expertise and aspirations with their objectives, demonstrating your commitment and suitability for the role.

Self-Assessment and Skill Highlighting

Conduct a thorough self-assessment to identify your strengths and accomplishments, showcasing them in alignment with the specific requirements of the role. Highlight your expertise in research methodologies, innovation strategies, and successful project outcomes, substantiating your capabilities as a valuable asset to the organization. As an R&D specialist, the ability to communicate your professional journey and achievements confidently is imperative in leaving a lasting impression on the hiring manager.

Presentation and Professionalism

Ensuring an impactful presentation involves dressing professionally, practicing non-verbal cues, and honing your communication skills to convey confidence and competence. Develop a succinct yet impactful narrative that articulates your passion for R&D, your problem-solving abilities, and your vision for contributing to the organization. Adopt a poised and professional demeanor throughout the interview, projecting credibility and a keen interest in driving innovation and progress within the company.

Use Lark for video interviews and candidate tracking .

Top 5 interview questions for research and development specialists and how to answer them

Question 1: describe a project where you successfully identified an unmet need and developed a groundbreaking solution to address it., why does this question matter.

This question is strategically designed to evaluate your critical thinking abilities, problem-solving skills, and your capacity to identify and address unexplored opportunities. Your response provides insight into your approach to innovation and your ability to propel new initiatives, thereby showcasing your potential as a valuable contributor to the R&D team.

What Do They Listen for in Your Answer?

The hiring manager pays close attention to your project management skills, creativity in generating insights, and your process for translating those insights into tangible innovations. They seek evidence of your proactive approach to investigating unmet needs and your resourcefulness in developing tailored solutions that can fill crucial gaps effectively.

Sample Answer

"In a previous role, I recognized a burgeoning need for sustainable packaging solutions within the food industry. I spearheaded a research project that involved comprehensive market analysis and collaboration with cross-functional teams to understand consumer demands and industry standards. Leveraging the insights gathered, we conceptualized a bio-based packaging material that not only met the industry's sustainability requirements but also enhanced product shelf-life, garnering significant cost savings for the company."

Question 2: How do you stay updated with the latest industry trends and technological advancements relevant to your role?

This question assesses your commitment to continuous learning and staying current with industry developments. Demonstrating an active engagement with industry trends and technological progressions underscores your dedication to enriching your skill set and staying at the forefront of innovation. This characteristic is essential in a rapidly-evolving R&D landscape where relevance and adaptability are paramount.

Your response provides insight into your approach to knowledge acquisition, your discernment of valuable sources of information, and your methods for integrating new knowledge into your professional endeavors. The hiring manager seeks evidence of your proactive efforts to remain informed and your ability to translate acquired knowledge into actionable strategies that drive R&D initiatives forward.

"I prioritize continuous learning and stay updated by subscribing to industry publications, attending relevant seminars and webinars, and actively participating in professional networking forums. I leverage these resources to gain insight into emerging technologies, industry best practices, and evolving regulatory standards. By incorporating this knowledge into my projects, I ensure that our R&D efforts align with the latest industry developments, positioning our organization as an innovative leader in the market."

Question 3: Can you describe a situation where you had to pivot your research strategy due to unforeseen challenges or changes in the market?

This question delves into your adaptability and agility in navigating uncertainties and challenges within the R&D landscape. It underscores the importance of being responsive to changing market dynamics while maintaining a strategic approach to R&D initiatives. Your response provides insight into your ability to recalibrate strategies effectively and ensure continued progress despite unforeseen obstacles.

The hiring manager evaluates your resilience in the face of unpredictability, your capacity for strategic decision-making, and your adeptness in mitigating potential setbacks. They seek evidence of your flexibility and your ability to harness unexpected changes as opportunities for innovation, illustrating your capability to steer R&D endeavors towards favorable outcomes in dynamic environments.

"During a previous project, our team encountered unexpected regulatory changes that impacted the viability of our initial research approach. In response, I swiftly collaborated with cross-functional teams to reassess the market landscape and identify alternative pathways. By leveraging our existing findings and recalibrating our research objectives, we successfully adapted our strategy to align with the evolving regulatory framework, ultimately introducing a novel product that not only complied with the new standards but also gained a competitive edge within the market."

Question 4: Describe a time when you had to advocate for the implementation of a new technology or innovative approach within your organization.

This question assesses your influence and persuasive abilities, as well as your aptitude for championing novel ideas within an organizational context. It sheds light on your capacity to drive change and innovation, showcasing your potential to integrate transformative technologies and methodologies into the R&D environment to advance organizational objectives.

Your response illuminates your leadership qualities, your knack for identifying transformational opportunities, and your ability to articulate the value proposition of new technologies or approaches convincingly. The hiring manager seeks evidence of your impact in driving organizational change and your adeptness in garnering support for R&D initiatives, underscoring your potential to foster innovation and growth within the organization.

"In my previous role, I recognized the potential of implementing advanced data analytics tools to enhance our R&D processes. I initiated a comprehensive research study to highlight the efficacy of these tools in optimizing our data-driven decision-making and fostering a culture of experimentation. By presenting tangible evidence of the potential impact and elucidating its alignment with our strategic goals, I successfully gained buy-in from key stakeholders, leading to the integration of these tools. The subsequent outcomes not only streamlined our R&D operations but also amplified our ability to identify and capitalize on new opportunities."

Question 5: How do you handle failure or negative results in your research projects, and what have you learned from such experiences?

This question delves into your resilience, adaptability, and propensity for learning from setbacks, which are essential attributes in the R&D domain. It underscores the importance of discerning valuable insights from failures and leveraging them to fortify future endeavors, demonstrating your maturity and growth mindset in handling challenges.

Your response provides insight into your emotional intelligence, your capacity for self-reflection, and your ability to extract meaningful learnings from unfavorable outcomes. The hiring manager seeks evidence of your willingness to embrace setbacks as opportunities for improvement and your capability to integrate the derived lessons into your subsequent research initiatives, underscoring your potential for continual professional development and improvement.

"In the face of setbacks, I employ a proactive approach in dissecting the circumstances leading to the negative outcomes, seeking to understand the underlying factors and the areas for potential improvement. I leverage these experiences to refine our research methodologies, recalibrate our hypotheses, and enhance our risk assessment strategies. Furthermore, I foster a culture of open dialogue within the team, encouraging the sharing of learnings and collectively shaping our approach to future projects. Embracing failure as a stepping stone to success has not only fortified our resilience but has also fostered a culture of continuous improvement within our R&D endeavors."

Do's and don'ts for research and development specialists interviews

Don'ts.

• Overpromise Results: Avoid making exaggerated claims about potential outcomes, instead focus on demonstrating proven capabilities and achievements.
• Disregard Preparation: Avoid neglecting thorough research and preparation for the interview, as it may undermine your credibility and commitment to the role.

Use Lark to conduct online interviews in 4 simple steps

Learn more about Lark x Employment

Question 1: what qualifications are sought after for a role as a research and development specialist?

Answer: Research and Development Specialist roles typically require a strong educational background in fields such as engineering, technology, or the sciences, with a focus on research methodologies, innovation, and project management. Additionally, experience in implementing novel solutions and a proven track record of driving successful R&D initiatives are highly valued by employers.

Question 2: how can i demonstrate my innovative prowess to potential employers during an interview?

Answer: To demonstrate your innovative prowess, highlight impactful projects where you conceptualized and implemented novel solutions, addressing unmet needs or navigating unforeseen challenges effectively. Emphasize your approach to innovation, your process for integrating new technologies, and the tangible impact of your initiatives, showcasing your capacity for driving transformative change.

Question 3: what are the essential qualities that hiring managers look for in prospective research and development specialists?

Answer: Hiring managers seek candidates with a comprehensive understanding of emerging trends, a versatility that enables them to adapt to dynamic challenges, and a visionary mindset that is synonymous with innovation. Additionally, a track record of fostering collaborations, driving change, and navigating uncertainties is highly regarded in potential Research and Development Specialists.

Question 4: how can i effectively convey my passion for innovation and commitment to r&d during an interview?

Answer: During the interview, articulate your passion for innovation and commitment to R&D by weaving impactful stories that highlight your innovative prowess, problem-solving capabilities, and your strategic vision for contributing to the organization. Emphasize your proactive engagement with industry developments and your capacity to translate knowledge into tangible initiatives, demonstrating your genuine dedication to driving innovation.

Question 5: what strategies can i employ to navigate unexpected challenges in an r&d interview?

Answer: When confronted with unexpected challenges in an R&D interview, leverage your adaptability and resilience to recalibrate your approach effectively, ensuring that unexpected circumstances do not impede your potential to showcase your capabilities. Additionally, maintaining a strategic and agile mindset, supplemented by thoughtful responses that draw from self-reflection and learning from setbacks, can fortify your ability to navigate and excel in the interview process.

Unveiling the art of becoming a Research and Development Specialist encapsulates a multifaceted journey, requiring an intricate blend of strategic preparation, prowess in articulating innovation, and a commitment to continuous learning and growth. By embracing this holistic approach, aspiring R&D specialists can navigate the interview process with confidence, showcasing their distinct value and potential in driving impactful research and developmental initiatives within their organizations.

Lark, bringing it all together

All your team need is Lark

Explore More in Interview Questions

Research and Development Manager Interview Questions

The most important interview questions for Research and Development Managers, and how to answer them

Getting Started as a Research and Development Manager

• What is a Research and Development Manager
• How to Become
• Certifications
• Tools & Software
• LinkedIn Guide
• Interview Questions
• Work-Life Balance
• Professional Goals
• Resume Examples
• Cover Letter Examples

Interviewing as a Research and Development Manager

Types of questions to expect in a research and development manager interview, technical expertise and innovation questions, behavioral and situational questions, project and team management questions, strategic planning and vision questions, preparing for a research and development manager interview, how to do interview prep as a research and development manager.

• Research the Company's R&D Focus: Gain a deep understanding of the company's current research projects, product development pipelines, and innovation strategies. This insight will help you align your expertise with their needs and show that you're a forward-thinking candidate.
• Understand Industry Trends and Technologies: Stay updated on the latest trends, technologies, and regulatory considerations in the industry. This knowledge will enable you to discuss how you can help the company stay competitive and compliant.
• Reflect on Leadership and Team Management Experiences: Prepare to share specific examples of how you've led R&D teams, managed budgets, and navigated the challenges of bringing a product from concept to market.
• Review Technical and Scientific Knowledge: Ensure that your technical skills and scientific knowledge are sharp, especially in areas that are critical to the company's R&D activities. Be prepared to discuss how you apply this knowledge in a managerial context.
• Prepare for Problem-Solving Scenarios: Be ready to tackle hypothetical R&D scenarios that may be presented during the interview. This will demonstrate your analytical thinking and decision-making skills in real-time.
• Develop a Vision for Innovation: Be prepared to articulate your vision for innovation and how you would foster a culture of creativity and continuous improvement within the R&D team.
• Formulate Insightful Questions: Prepare thoughtful questions that show your interest in the company's R&D direction and how you can contribute to its long-term objectives.
• Engage in Mock Interviews: Practice with peers or mentors who can provide feedback on your responses and help refine your communication and presentation skills.

Stay Organized with Interview Tracking

Research and Development Manager Interview Questions and Answers

"how do you manage the r&d process to align with strategic business goals", how to answer it, example answer, "can you describe a time when you had to make a tough decision regarding project prioritization or resource allocation", "how do you foster innovation within your r&d team", "what is your approach to managing cross-functional teams in an r&d environment", "describe a time when you had to adapt to a significant change in technology or market trends during a project's development.", "how do you ensure that your r&d projects comply with industry regulations and ethical standards", "can you give an example of how you've used data to drive r&d decision-making", "what methodologies do you use to track and evaluate the progress of your r&d projects", which questions should you ask in a research and development manager interview, good questions to ask the interviewer, "can you describe the company's r&d strategy and how the role of an r&d manager contributes to this vision", "what are the current challenges facing the r&d team, and how does the company support the team in overcoming these obstacles", "how does the company approach collaboration between r&d and other departments, such as manufacturing, marketing, and sales", "in what ways does the company invest in r&d to keep pace with technological advancements and industry trends", what does a good research and development manager candidate look like, innovative mindset, technical expertise, strategic planning, leadership and team management, project management skills, communication and interpersonal skills, adaptability and risk management, regulatory and compliance knowledge, interview faqs for research and development managers, what is the most common interview question for research and development managers, what's the best way to discuss past failures or challenges in a research and development manager interview, how can i effectively showcase problem-solving skills in a research and development manager interview.

Research and Development Manager Job Title Guide

Related Interview Guides

Steering innovative product journeys from ideation to successful market launches

Leading technical teams, driving innovation and ensuring project success in engineering

Leading tech innovation, driving team performance for efficient engineering solutions

Driving tech innovation, leading strategic IT decisions, shaping the future of business

Driving tech projects from conception to completion, ensuring efficiency and quality

Start Your Research and Development Manager Career with Teal

CASE STUDY Up-Leveling Array’s Sales and Engineering Hiring

CASE STUDY Scaling Angi’s Engineering Hiring

CASE STUDY Ramping Recruiters for Exceptional
 Sales Hiring

Access Over 300 A+ Interview Questions

GUIDE Download an Interview Training Deck Template & Facilitation Guide

Shine Join Our Shine Community

RESOURCE Access Over 300 A+ Interview Questions

27 Innovation Interview Questions to Ask a Candidate

By the BrightHire Team

Additional Interview Questions

• Collaboration Interview Questions
• Communication Interview Questions
• Decision-Making Interview Questions
• Innovation Interview Questions
• People Management Interview Questions

What do Google, Salesforce, Starbucks, and Nintendo all have in common? They’re some of the most innovative companies in the world according to Forbes . Although many organizations strive to be the next leader in innovation, they overlook an important point: your ability to innovate begins with the candidates you hire.

Are you looking for a candidate with proven chops to think outside the box and come up with innovative ideas? Hiring the right person all comes down to the interview questions you ask.

In this article, you’ll find 27 interview questions to help you gauge a candidate’s innovation abilities. Along with general innovation questions, you’ll also find questions for related competencies, including goal-oriented, service-oriented, strategic thinking, and technical skill.

Read on to uncover all of the innovation interview questions.

General Innovation Interview Questions

Goal-oriented interview questions, service-oriented interview questions, strategic thinking interview questions, technical skill interview questions.

• Tell me about a time when your go-to solution for a problem didn’t work. What did you do instead?
• Do you think it’s better to rely on an established method that you know will work or to try a new method that involves a risk of failing?
• Tell me about the last time you had to come up with a creative solution to overcome an obstacle or solve a problem. What steps did you take to create the solution?
• Tell me about a time when you came up with a solution on the fly. What was the problem you were solving, and what was your process for thinking of the solution?
• Is there a situation when an organization shouldn’t seek to innovate a process or method? Explain your reasoning.
• Describe a time when you successfully implemented a process improvement that made a positive impact. What steps did you take to think of the improvement and implement it?
• Tell me about a time when you set an ambitious goal for a project you were working on. How did you determine the goal, and what steps did you take to try to meet it?
• Tell me about a time when you incorporated your company’s mission into a project.
• Tell me about the last project you worked on that you were passionate about. What made you so invested in the project?
• What parts of the values and missions of our organization most resonate with you?
• Tell me about a time when you completed a difficult task against all odds.
• Imagine you were starting in this role today, and I asked you to set three goals: one to achieve within the week, one within the first few months, and one within a year from today. What would those goals be?
• Tell me about a time when you didn’t meet your [project deadline / sales quota]. How did you react, and what did you do?

Filter questions by competency, department, and role with our free question-finding tool.

• Tell me about a time when you went above and beyond in your work for a [customer / manager].
• Tell me about the last work-related project you supported or managed that you were really proud of. What made your contribution to that particular project special?
• Tell me about a time when you had to balance doing high-quality work and driving results while maintaining a work-life balance for yourself.
• Tell me about a time when you made a lasting impression on a [prospect / customer].
• Tell me about a time when you had to understand the big picture while also managing a lot of smaller details. How did you avoid losing sight of the overall strategy?
• Imagine you have to explain a major project you’re working on to the CEO, but you only have 3-4 sentences to explain it. What would you say?
• Do you tend to be a big-picture thinker or detail-oriented? Share an example that illustrates the approach you take.
• Tell me about a time when you had to build a strategic plan. What steps did you take, and what was the outcome?
• Tell me about a time when you took a step back to better understand the big picture in a situation. How did you know you needed to take a step back and what did you learn from the experience?
• Tell me about a time when you measured a strategy’s effectiveness. What was your process for measuring success?
• Tell me about a project you’ve worked on that connects to the larger context of your business and the market it operates in. 
• What kinds of sources (publications, experts, influencers, etc.) do you follow to stay in the loop on the latest [marketing, sales, customer success] best practices and trends?
• Tell me about a time when you created and implemented a plan from start to finish. What steps did you take?
• Tell me about a system you designed or improved. What did it look like before, and how did you evolve it?
• Tell me about a situation where you had to apply a newly acquired knowledge or skill.
• Describe a time when you used logic to solve a technical problem.
• Tell me about a time when you were unable to overcome a technical issue or problem. Why were you unable to overcome it, and what did you learn from the experience?
• Tell me about a time when you anticipated a need to improve a technical skill and proactively took action.
• What are some ways you stay in the loop on the latest tech trends?
• Tell me about a time when your industry knowledge helped you identify a potential problem and develop a strategy to address it.
• When presented with a new technology in the workplace, how do you adapt?
• Tell me about a time when you used technology to avoid, identify, or solve a problem.

Hire better with help from 300+ interview questions

Looking for more helpful interview questions? With our interview question-finding tool, you can access 300+ interview questions that you can filter by competency, department, and role.

Download the Interview Question Finder to unlock a free bank of interview questions. Or, visit the Interview Question Resource Hub to find more interview questions by competency and role.

• Skip to content

'Are you innovative?' Tricky graduate interview question

Rachael Milsom

Last updated: 21 Jun 2023, 15:36

You don’t need to be an entrepreneur to successfully answer innovation interview questions. You just need to show the recruiters that you’ve got potential.

Every employer’s success relies on the people who work there, the ideas that they can bring to the table and their ability to have a positive impact on the company’s work. So don’t be surprised if your graduate job interview includes a question on how innovative you are.

Several graduates have told us that they find the word ‘innovation’ intimidating, are worried that they aren’t innovative enough or struggle to think of an example of when they have been innovative. It can be tricky to come up with a good answer on the spot. However, if you take the time to prepare an answer before your interview and use our advice below, there will be no reason for nerves.

Get help on answering more difficult interview questions with our article on the top nine tough tricky interview questions and answers .

You can practise tricky interview questions using resources from our partners at Shortlist.Me .

How not to reply to the interview question ‘Are you innovative?’

1. ‘I’m not really sure if I’m innovative.’ While this may be the first thing that comes into your head, it’s better to take a moment to consider what you want to say, rather than blurting this out. Instead of demonstrating your innovativeness, it may suggest that you aren’t making an effort or aren’t enthusiastic about the job.

2. ‘Without a doubt. I’m the most innovative person I know by far.’ You don’t want to oversell yourself with such a bold statement, especially without any evidence of your experience or achievements. It’s good to be self-confident and it’s definitely OK to say that you think you are innovative, but you don’t want to sound arrogant.

3. ‘Yeah, I’d say I’m innovative. I just completed a group project at university. We needed 30 students to complete our questionnaire but were struggling to recruit enough people. My friend Bill came up with a great idea: all of the participants were entered into a prize draw and the winner got a pizza on us.’ What’s good about this answer is that it gives a real example of an innovative solution. You should try to include an example in your answer. Unfortunately, this example is somebody else’s idea. It’s important that the answer you give demonstrates your innovativeness.

What is the graduate recruiter really asking?

Innovation will mean slightly different things to different employers; while an engineering company may be looking for a graduate who is committed to developing cutting-edge technologies, a marketing agency will be impressed by a candidate whose instinct is to think outside of the box for different ways to reach people.

Ultimately, though, the recruiter is asking whether you’re the kind of person that sticks to the status quo and doesn’t challenge how things are done, or whether you’re eager to find new and improved ways of doing things. They’re also asking whether you have the potential to help their company succeed.

Our sixty second guide to showing an employer that you are innovative

Our short guide breaks down how you can show that you are innovative, even if you don’t feel it.

When a company asks you about being innovative, they just want to see that you have potential. Our targetjobs careers expert talks you through how to show this.

So how should you tackle the question ‘Are you innovative’?

Think about what innovation means to you – and to the company. Its website could give you some clues, especially what it says about its values and priorities. It might also help you to think of somebody who you would describe as innovative. Why did you pick them? What skills and qualities do they possess that you admire?

Some skills and qualities that go hand-in-hand with innovation are:

• the confidence to take on big, ambitious goals and take risks
• the ability to adapt and be resourceful in unexpected situations
• the motivation to identify where things can be improved and then act on it
• the enthusiasm to try new things and gain new skills
• a creative approach to problem solving
• the ability to think imaginatively, but also strategically and practically (after all, it doesn’t matter how creative an idea is if it isn’t realistic commercially)
• the ability to work independently without much input from others as well as to work with a team towards a shared goal

While it isn’t essential, the recruiter will be impressed if you can draw on your work experience, extracurricular activities, university studies and so on to explain how you’ve developed these skills and qualities.

Your examples don’t need to be extraordinary. The recruiter will appreciate that you’re just starting out in your career; they won’t be expecting you to have invented a time machine, given the prime minister tips on how to make a success of Brexit and come up with a way to cut the queueing time at Heathrow in half, all by the time you graduate.

More realistic examples include:

• thinking of a unique way to fundraise for charity
• brainstorming how to increase ticket sales for your drama society’s theatre production
• finding a less time-consuming way to complete a group project for your degree
• suggesting a new weekday deal that will bring in more students to the restaurant where you have a part-time job

Focus on what you did, although that doesn’t mean the example shouldn’t be team-based. Just highlight how you led the team and worked well with others.

If possible, use an example that shows how you had a positive effect. For example, maybe your idea to introduce a student-only meal deal on Thursday evenings, alongside a loyalty card scheme, saw a 50% increase in repeat custom.

Other interview questions you could be asked about innovation

There are several competency-based questions that you could be asked, such as:

• Tell me about a time when you were innovative.
• Tell me about a time when you took an innovative approach to solving a problem.
• Tell me about a time when you thought of a better way to do something.

Other questions about innovation that an interviewer could ask include:

• What’s the best idea you’ve ever had?
• In your opinion, what’s the greatest innovation in history?
• Can you think of a new way to…?
• Do you like to experiment?
• If you had one month to spend £30,000 on one project, what would it be?
• If you met our CEO for half an hour, what future opportunities would you suggest to them?

Careers where innovation is in demand

If you’re applying for jobs in any of the following areas, you could be asked about innovation at interview, as it is seen as a particularly important quality by employers in these industries:

• charity and the public sector
• engineering
• fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG)
• marketing and advertising
• science and research

targetjobs editorial advice

This describes editorially independent and impartial content, which has been written and edited by the targetjobs content team. Any external contributors featuring in the article are in line with our non-advertorial policy, by which we mean that we do not promote one organisation over another.

People reading this also searched for roles in these areas:

• Graduate Jobs
• Graduate Schemes
• Internships

Related careers advice

We've got you

• Guidelines to Write Experiences
• Write Interview Experience
• Write Work Experience
• Write Admission Experience
• Write Campus Experience
• Write Engineering Experience
• Write Coaching Experience
• Write Professional Degree Experience
• Write Govt. Exam Experiences
• TCS Interview Experience (On-Campus)
• TCS Interview Experience (On-Campus 2019)
• TCS Interview Experience | Campus Placement for Software Engineer
• TCS Digital Interview Experience | On-Campus
• TCS Digital Interview Experience (On-Campus)
• TCS digital On-Campus Placement Drive
• TCS Digital 2019 July(On-Campus)
• TCS Digital Interview Experience for Systems Engineer | On-Campus 2022
• TCS Digital Interview Experience(On-Campus)
• TCS Digital Interview Experience (On-Campus Virtual 2020)
• TCS Digital On-Campus Placement
• TCS InfraMind Interview Experience
• TCS Interview Experience
• TCS Interview Experience 2020 | Digital profile
• TCS Interview Experience 2021

TCS Innovator Interview Experience | On-Campus 2021 (Virtual)

TCS hires candidates for Innovator profile from IITs, NITs, IIITs and Top Institutes. Through this hiring you will get a Research role in the TCS Research and Innovation Unit.

On 9th January 2021 TCS conducted an online test for this profile.

Round 1: 

There are 15 questions from Aptitude and 15 questions from English Grammar. 

There were 2 coding questions after that.

a. Check if given string contains all the digits  

b. Find the smallest number whose digits multiply to a given number n

Sufficient time was given for the test.

Important Point:

Marks are deducted for wrong answers.

After this round, 21 students are selected for the Interview round.

Received a mail on 21st January that my interview is scheduled for 22nd January. Be ready with all the documents.

Got a call around 3pm in the afternoon. There were 4 people in the interview panel.

They welcomed me and started with the basic formalities like show your aadhar card, Xth Marksheet, 12th Marksheet, Recent Semester Mark-sheet and lastly told me to present my resume on the screen.

1. Introduce yourself. 

I have taken 3 minutes for introducing myself in which I have mainly told them about my internship, project work, research work & area of interest.

2. Then they have asked questions from my internship like on which tech stack I have done work, what was my contribution and what are the outcomes of that internship.

3. Then they moved to project section in my resume, I have mentioned  2 project on machine learning in my resume. So, they first asked me to briefly explain them about the project. Later, they asked me about my favorite ML algorithm and why it is better than others.

4. What is ‘training Set’ and ‘test Set’ in a Machine Learning Model?

5. When will you use Classification over Regression?

6. What is deep learning, and how does it contrast with other machine learning algorithms?

7. Do you have research experience in machine learning?

8. Moving on, then other interviewer asked me What I have done during pandemic like I did any Certification or coursework ?

-> I  told them that I have done certification in cloud technology and completed 2 courses of ML from Coursera.

9. What is Cloud Computing ? What are IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS ? Do you have any experience of Azure, AWS or GCP ? 

10. What is MongoDB and how it is better than MySQL ? What are the major differences between these two ? 

11. What is the static keyword, static function, Pointer and its uses ?

12. What are the common keywords in python ? 

13. How to convert a list into string ?

14. What are the parameters in a function ?

15. What is Polymorphism ?

16. What is BCNF and 2NF ?

17. What is Indexing and ACID properties in DBMS ?

Then they asked me a puzzle. 

18. How many squares are there in a 4 x 4 grid and find a general formula for n*n grid ?

They gave me few minutes for this and allowed me to use pen paper. After few minutes I gave them a general formula.

19. In how many hackathons you have participated ?

20. What you will do if your interested field is not given during Job ?

21. Where Do You See Yourself in 5 Years ? 

and the last question was 

22. Why TCS ?

Interview takes around 45 to 50 minutes and it was held on Microsoft Team.

On 27th January received a message from our placement cell that out of 21 students 7 students have been selected for Innovator role and I was one of them.

I got my offer letter on 12th February from NextStep portal. 

• Be Confident.
• Revise the projects that you’ve mentioned in your resume, you’ll get a lot questions from those.
• If you don’t know the answer, just tell them what you know and also mention them that you aren’t aware of exact answer. Don’t say NO immediately to any questions that you don’t know .

It is a good thing that TCS upgrades your offer if you cleared the test. I got upgraded from Digital to Innovator. So, Don’t lose hope if you are having Ninja/Digital offer from TCS. 

You can checkout my TCS Digital Interview experience here. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/tcs-codevita-interview-experience-season-9-2020-2/

Please Login to comment...

Similar reads.

• TCS-interview-experience
• Experiences
• Interview Experiences
• 10 Best Free Note-Taking Apps for Android - 2024
• 10 Best VLC Media Player Alternatives in 2024 (Free)
• 10 Best Free Time Management and Productivity Apps for Android - 2024
• 10 Best Adobe Illustrator Alternatives in 2024
• 30 OOPs Interview Questions and Answers (2024)

Improve your Coding Skills with Practice

What kind of Experience do you want to share?

A business journal from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

AI and Innovation: A Question of Quantity vs. Quality

March 25, 2024 • 3 min read.

In a recent AI at Wharton webinar, scholars shared their research on how AI can enhance innovation and where the limitations are.

The following article was originally published by  AI at Wharton .

Generative artificial intelligence has a quantity-over-quality problem.

One of the biggest challenges in using large language models like ChatGPT is precision.

“Why do you need to buy the whole candy store if you just need a lollipop,” said Daniel Ringel , marketing professor at the University of Chapel Hill’s Kenan-Flagler Business School.

His latest study looks at how synthetic experts can refine results to give users exactly what they need. He created one for the study and compared it with the work of crowdsourcing amateurs, academic experts, and ChatGPT-4. The synthetic expert outdid them all, performing 66 times faster and 400 times cheaper than ChatGPT-4.

Ringel was one of four scholars who shared their work during the webinar, “AI and Innovation,” that streamed live on March 1. The webinar series is hosted by AI at Wharton . Wharton professor of operations, information and decisions, and co-director of AI at Wharton Kartik Hosanagar served as moderator.

“Clearly, AI is going to significantly transform work, the productivity of organizations, even how things work at the macroeconomic and societal level,” he said.

The webinar also featured research presentations from Dokyun Lee , information systems professor at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business; Rayna Xu , information systems and analytics professor at Miami University’s Farmer School of Business; and Léonard Boussioux , information systems and operations management professor at the University of Washington’s Foster School of Business.

Boussioux hailed AI’s ability to help humans solve the world’s most pressing problems — including the sustainable development goals set by the United Nations — if they can filter out the noise. In his co-authored paper on gen AI and crowdsourcing, he found humans and machines were equal in creating ideas for the circular economy. But humans were better at highly novel solutions, so the most valuable ideas came from a collaboration of both.

“It’s easy for AI to recombine ideas, but it’s harder to get moonshots.” — Léonard Boussioux

“This whole study is motivated by the statistical view of innovation. The best ideas are statistically rare,” Boussioux said. “It’s easy for AI to recombine ideas, but it’s harder to get moonshots.”

Xu’s co-authored paper looked at another aspect of AI’s quantity-over-quality problem by examining whether Google or ChatGPT was better at information retrieval. The study found ChatGPT excelled at pulling answers to questions but struggled with fact-checking. Depending on the task, integrating AI into traditional search engines may generate the most stable results, she said.

Xu pointed out ChatGPT’s accuracy is improving, with each iteration getting better at fact-checking.

Lee’s co-authored study introduced InnoVAET, an exploratory tool that enables interpretation, comparison, visualization, and augmented creation of multi-modal business objects. He said the tool can help business leaders understand the competitive landscape and filter good ideas for strategic action.

“Novelty is the easy part,” he said. “The challenging part is how do you make sure that things are valuable.”

More From Knowledge at Wharton

AI and the Workforce: How Gen AI Can Help Employees Flourish

AI and Machine Creativity: How Artistic Production Is Changing

How to Protect Intellectual Property in the Age of AI

Looking for more insights.

Sign up to stay informed about our latest article releases.

25 Innovation Manager Interview Questions and Answers

Learn what skills and qualities interviewers are looking for from an innovation manager, what questions you can expect, and how you should go about answering them.

As innovation manager, you are responsible for developing and implementing new products, services, or processes within your organization. This job requires creativity, strategic thinking, and the ability to see the big picture. You also need to be able to manage and motivate a team of engineers, scientists, and other professionals to bring your innovative ideas to fruition.

If you want to land this challenging and rewarding job, you need to be prepared to answer some tough interview questions. In this guide, we will help you prepare for questions about your experience, your ability to think outside the box, and your ability to lead a team. We will also provide tips on how to answer common interview questions.

1. Are you familiar with the principles of lean or agile development?

The interviewer may ask this question to assess your knowledge of the development process and how you apply it. Use examples from your experience to explain what these principles are, how they work and how you use them in your own projects.

Example: “Yes, I am familiar with the principles of lean and agile development. In my current role as an Innovation Manager, I have been responsible for leading projects that utilize both approaches. For example, I recently implemented a lean methodology to streamline our product design process. This allowed us to reduce time-to-market by 20%, while still maintaining high quality standards. Similarly, I also utilized an agile approach to develop a new mobile application. By breaking down the project into smaller tasks and assigning them to different teams, we were able to launch the app in just two months.”

2. What are some of the most important skills for an innovation manager to have?

This question can help the interviewer determine if you have the skills and qualifications to succeed in this role. Use your answer to highlight some of the most important skills for innovation managers, such as communication, problem-solving, creativity and leadership.

Example: “As an innovation manager, I believe the most important skills to have are strong leadership and organizational abilities. Leadership is essential for managing teams of innovators and ensuring that projects stay on track. Being able to effectively communicate with team members and stakeholders is also a key skill. This includes being able to clearly articulate goals and expectations as well as providing feedback in a constructive manner.

Organizational skills are also critical for success in this role. Innovation managers need to be able to prioritize tasks, manage multiple projects at once, and ensure deadlines are met. They must also be able to analyze data and trends in order to make informed decisions about which projects should be pursued. Finally, they must be creative problem solvers who can come up with innovative solutions to complex challenges.”

3. How do you manage a team of designers, engineers and other professionals?

An interviewer may ask this question to learn more about your leadership skills and how you can motivate a team of professionals. Use examples from past experiences where you managed a large group of people, organized projects or delegated tasks effectively.

Example: “I believe the key to successfully managing a team of designers, engineers and other professionals is communication. I strive to create an open environment where everyone can share ideas and collaborate on projects. By creating this type of atmosphere, it encourages creativity and innovation while also allowing for efficient problem solving.

In addition, I make sure that each member of the team has clear expectations and goals. This helps them stay focused and motivated throughout the project. I also provide regular feedback so they know how their work is being received and what areas need improvement. Finally, I ensure that all members of the team are given equal opportunities to contribute and be heard.”

4. What is your experience with developing new products or services?

This question can help the interviewer understand your experience with innovation and how you’ve used it to develop new products or services in the past. Use examples from previous roles to explain what steps you took to innovate a product or service, and highlight any skills that helped you succeed.

Example: “I have extensive experience in developing new products and services. In my current role as an Innovation Manager, I am responsible for leading the development of innovative solutions that meet customer needs. My team and I use a combination of market research, customer feedback, and creative problem-solving to develop new products and services that are both profitable and beneficial to our customers.

We also collaborate with other departments to ensure that any new product or service is designed with the customer in mind. We take into consideration their wants and needs, as well as the competitive landscape, when creating new offerings. This helps us create products and services that are unique and valuable to our customers.”

5. Provide an example of a time when you had to deal with a difficult customer or client.

An interviewer may ask this question to assess your problem-solving skills and ability to work with challenging people. Your answer should show that you can remain calm under pressure, communicate effectively and solve problems creatively.

Example: “I recently had to deal with a difficult customer while working as an Innovation Manager. The customer was unhappy with the product they had purchased and wanted a refund. I knew that this situation needed to be handled delicately, so I took the time to listen to their concerns and understand why they were dissatisfied.

I then worked with my team to come up with a solution that would satisfy both parties. We offered the customer a partial refund and provided them with additional services to make up for the dissatisfaction. In addition, we also implemented changes in our processes to ensure similar issues wouldn’t arise in the future.”

6. If we were to visit your team, what would they be working on?

This question can help the interviewer understand what your team is focused on and how you manage their time. Use this opportunity to explain a project or two that your team is working on, including why it’s important for the company.

Example: “If you were to visit my team, you would see a highly motivated and engaged group of individuals working on innovative projects. We are constantly looking for ways to improve our processes and products, so we are always exploring new ideas and approaches. Our focus is on creating solutions that will have an impact in the marketplace.

We use a variety of methods to generate ideas, such as brainstorming sessions, customer feedback surveys, and market research. Once we have identified potential opportunities, we then develop prototypes and test them with customers to get their feedback. Finally, we refine our ideas based on this feedback and move forward with implementation.”

7. What would you do if you saw one of your employees using a outdated or inefficient method to complete their work?

This question can help the interviewer determine how you would handle a situation where your team members may not be using the most innovative methods to complete their work. Your answer should show that you value innovation and are willing to teach others about new ways of doing things.

Example: “If I saw one of my employees using an outdated or inefficient method to complete their work, the first thing I would do is have a conversation with them. It’s important to understand why they are using this particular method and what challenges they may be facing. This will help me determine if there is a better way for them to accomplish their task.

Once I understand the situation, I can then provide guidance on how to improve their process. This could include introducing new tools or technologies that make their job easier, providing additional training, or helping them find more efficient ways to complete their tasks. My goal is to ensure that all of my team members are working in the most effective and productive manner possible.

I also believe in creating an environment where employees feel comfortable asking questions and expressing their ideas. If I see an employee struggling with an outdated or inefficient method, I want to create a safe space for them to voice their concerns so we can come up with solutions together.”

8. How well do you handle stress?

Innovation managers often work in high-pressure environments. Employers ask this question to make sure you can handle the stress of the job and still perform well. In your answer, explain how you manage stress and give examples of how you’ve done so in the past.

Example: “I believe I handle stress very well. As an Innovation Manager, I understand that there are times when the pressure is high and deadlines must be met. In these situations, I stay focused on the task at hand and remain calm in order to make sure that the job gets done correctly and efficiently.

I also take proactive steps to manage my stress levels. For example, I practice mindfulness meditation and exercise regularly to help me stay relaxed and clear-headed during stressful periods. I’m also a strong believer in taking breaks throughout the day to recharge and reset my mind. Finally, I find it helpful to talk through any issues or concerns with colleagues or mentors so that I can get their perspective and gain new insights.”

9. Do you have any questions for me about the role or company?

This is your opportunity to show the interviewer that you’ve done your research and are genuinely interested in the position. It’s also a chance for you to ask about any information you may have missed from the job listing or company website.

Example: “Yes, I do have a few questions. First, what is the company’s current innovation strategy? Second, how would you describe the team culture and how does it support innovation? Finally, what kind of resources are available to help me succeed in this role?

I believe my experience as an Innovation Manager makes me the right person for this job. I have managed multiple projects from concept to completion, leading teams through all stages of development while staying on budget and meeting deadlines. My track record demonstrates that I am capable of driving innovation initiatives forward and creating successful outcomes.

In addition to my experience, I bring enthusiasm and energy to every project. I’m passionate about finding creative solutions to complex problems and thrive when working with diverse teams. I’m confident that I can make a positive contribution to your organization’s innovation efforts.”

10. When do you think it’s appropriate to ask your team to try something new?

This question can help the interviewer determine how you approach new ideas and whether you’re willing to try them yourself. Your answer should show that you are open-minded, but also that you know when it’s appropriate to implement a new idea.

Example: “I believe it is important to assess the situation and determine when it is appropriate to ask my team to try something new. If there is a need for change or improvement, I will evaluate if introducing a new approach would be beneficial. This includes assessing the resources available, the current workflow, and the potential impact of implementing a new strategy.

I also consider the team’s comfort level with trying something new. If they are open to experimentation and willing to take risks, then I am more likely to suggest a new approach. However, if the team is resistant to change, I may recommend taking small steps towards innovation. This could involve introducing new ideas slowly and providing support throughout the process.”

11. We want to become more innovative, what ideas do you have for us?

This question is a great way to show your interviewer that you have ideas for how the company can improve and grow. It’s important to be honest with your answer, as it will help them see what you’re capable of doing if they hire you.

Example: “I believe that innovation is key to staying competitive in today’s market. My experience as an Innovation Manager has taught me that there are several ways to increase a company’s innovative capacity.

Firstly, I would suggest creating an environment where employees feel comfortable and encouraged to come up with new ideas. This could include setting aside time for brainstorming sessions, or providing incentives for creative thinking. It is also important to create a culture of collaboration within the organization; this will help foster creativity and encourage team members to work together to develop new solutions.

Secondly, I would recommend investing in research and development. By dedicating resources to researching emerging trends and technologies, your company can stay ahead of the competition and identify opportunities for growth. Finally, it is essential to have a system in place to evaluate and implement new ideas. This way, you can ensure that only the best ideas are implemented and that they are done so efficiently and effectively.”

12. Describe your process for coming up with new ideas.

This question can help the interviewer understand how you approach innovation and creativity. Your answer should include a few steps that you use to generate new ideas for your company.

Example: “My process for coming up with new ideas starts with research. I like to understand the current industry trends, customer needs and market opportunities so that I can identify potential areas of innovation. Once I have identified a few possible avenues, I then start brainstorming with my team to come up with creative solutions. We use various tools such as mind mapping, storyboarding and design thinking to generate different ideas. After we have generated some initial concepts, we evaluate them against our criteria such as feasibility, cost-effectiveness and scalability. Finally, we select the best idea and develop it further into a viable product or service. Throughout this process, I also ensure that everyone on the team is involved in the decision making and has an opportunity to contribute their own unique perspectives.”

13. What makes you qualified for this role?

Employers ask this question to learn more about your background and how it relates to the role. Before your interview, make a list of all your relevant experience. Consider including any leadership roles you’ve held in the past, education or certifications that relate to innovation management.

Example: “I am an experienced Innovation Manager with a proven track record of success in driving innovation initiatives. I have over 10 years of experience leading teams and developing innovative solutions to complex problems. My background includes working with both large corporations and start-ups, giving me a unique perspective on how to approach new challenges.

I have a strong understanding of the latest trends and technologies in the industry, which allows me to identify opportunities for growth and improvement. I also have extensive experience managing projects from concept to completion, ensuring that all stakeholders are aligned and that deadlines are met. Finally, I possess excellent communication skills, allowing me to effectively collaborate with team members and stakeholders.”

14. Which industries do you have the most experience in?

This question can help the interviewer understand your experience level and how it relates to their company. It also helps them determine if you have any industry-specific skills that could be beneficial for their organization. When preparing for this question, think about which industries you’ve worked in and what skills you developed from those experiences. Consider mentioning a skill or two that might be transferable to this new role.

Example: “I have extensive experience in the technology, retail, and healthcare industries. I have worked on a variety of projects ranging from developing new products to optimizing existing processes. In the technology industry, I was responsible for leading teams to develop innovative solutions that improved customer experiences. In the retail sector, I managed projects that focused on improving operational efficiency and increasing sales. Finally, in the healthcare space, I worked with stakeholders to create strategies that increased patient satisfaction and reduced costs.”

15. What do you think is the most important thing an innovation manager can do to help their team succeed?

This question can help the interviewer get a better idea of your leadership skills and how you would approach managing a team. Your answer should include examples of what you did to help your previous teams succeed, such as providing resources or helping them develop their skills.

Example: “As an Innovation Manager, I believe the most important thing I can do to help my team succeed is to create a culture of innovation. This means fostering an environment where creativity and risk-taking are encouraged and celebrated. It also involves creating processes that allow for experimentation and iteration, so that ideas can be tested quickly and efficiently. Finally, it requires providing resources such as training, mentorship, and access to technology to ensure that everyone on the team has the tools they need to innovate. By doing these things, I will empower my team to come up with creative solutions to problems and drive meaningful change within the organization.”

16. How often do you recommend that your team try new ideas?

This question can help the interviewer understand how you approach innovation and whether your team members feel comfortable trying new ideas. Your answer should show that you encourage creativity and support your team’s efforts to try new things.

Example: “I believe that it is important to encourage my team to think outside the box and come up with new ideas on a regular basis. I typically recommend that my team try out at least one new idea every month. This helps keep them engaged in their work, as well as encourages creative problem solving.

When introducing a new idea, I ensure that everyone understands why we are trying it, what the expected outcome should be, and how it will benefit the company. I also provide resources for my team to help them research and develop the idea further. Finally, I make sure that there is an open dialogue throughout the process so that any issues or concerns can be addressed quickly.”

17. There is a new idea that your team just isn’t getting, how would you approach it?

This question is a great way to see how the candidate approaches new ideas and concepts. It also shows you how they handle conflict, which can be important in an office setting. Your answer should show that you are willing to take on challenges and help your team understand new ideas or processes.

Example: “As an Innovation Manager, I understand that new ideas can be difficult for teams to get on board with. My approach would depend on the specifics of the situation and the team involved.

Generally speaking, my first step would be to clearly articulate the value of the idea and how it could benefit the organization. This helps ensure everyone is on the same page in terms of understanding the purpose behind the idea. Once this is established, I would then work to identify any potential roadblocks or challenges that may arise when implementing the idea. Finally, I would create a plan of action to address these issues and ensure successful implementation.

I have found that by taking this methodical approach, teams are more likely to embrace new ideas and see them through to completion.”

18. Describe a time when you had to make a difficult decision as an innovation manager.

When an interviewer asks you a question like this, they’re trying to understand how you make decisions and what your thought process is. This can be a great opportunity for you to show the interviewer that you have strong critical thinking skills and are able to use them in real-world situations.

Example: “As an innovation manager, I have had to make difficult decisions throughout my career. One of the most challenging decisions I had to make was when a new project presented itself with a tight timeline and limited resources.

I had to decide whether or not to take on this project despite the constraints. After careful consideration, I decided that it was worth taking on as the potential benefits outweighed the risks. To ensure success, I worked closely with the team to develop a plan that would maximize our resources while still meeting the deadline. We ended up successfully completing the project ahead of schedule and within budget. This experience taught me the importance of making informed decisions in order to achieve successful outcomes.”

19. What do you believe is the key to successful product launch?

This question can help the interviewer determine your understanding of what it takes to launch a product successfully. Your answer should include several key elements that you believe are important for launching a successful product, such as communication and collaboration with other departments.

Example: “Successful product launches require a lot of preparation and planning. In my experience, the key to successful product launch is having an effective strategy in place that takes into account all aspects of the process. This includes understanding customer needs, developing a marketing plan, creating a budget, and setting realistic goals.

Additionally, it’s important to have a strong team with diverse perspectives and skillsets who can collaborate effectively. Having a clear vision for the product, as well as a comprehensive roadmap, will help ensure everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goal. Finally, staying agile and flexible throughout the process is essential to adapting quickly to any changes or challenges that arise.”

20. How have you incorporated feedback from customers into your products or services?

The interviewer may ask this question to learn more about your ability to collaborate with others and implement their ideas. Use examples from past experiences where you received customer feedback, analyzed the data and presented your findings to your team or manager so they could make changes to a product or service.

Example: “I have a strong track record of incorporating customer feedback into my products and services. I believe that understanding the needs and wants of customers is essential for creating successful innovations. To this end, I have implemented several strategies to ensure that customer feedback is taken into account when developing new products or services.

One such strategy is conducting regular surveys with customers to gain insights on their experience with our product or service. This allows us to identify areas where improvements can be made and also helps us understand what features are most important to them. I then use this information to inform the design process, ensuring that we create something that meets the needs of our customers.

Another approach I take is engaging in conversations with customers directly. This gives me an opportunity to ask questions about their experiences and get more detailed feedback than what might be provided through surveys. These conversations allow me to build relationships with customers and better understand their individual needs.”

21. Do you have any experience in managing budgets for innovative projects?

This question can help the interviewer understand your experience with managing budgets and how you might handle a budget for their company. Use examples from past projects to explain how you managed your team’s finances and helped them stay within the budget.

Example: “Yes, I have extensive experience in managing budgets for innovative projects. In my current role as an Innovation Manager, I am responsible for developing and executing the budget for all of our innovation initiatives. This includes researching new technologies, identifying potential partners, and creating a financial plan to ensure that each project is completed within its allocated budget.

I also have experience in negotiating contracts with vendors and suppliers to get the best value for money. My ability to identify cost-saving opportunities has allowed me to successfully manage complex projects while staying on budget. Furthermore, I have been able to develop strategies to maximize resources and minimize costs without sacrificing quality or results.”

22. Describe a time when you had to pivot quickly due to changing customer demands.

An interviewer may ask this question to assess your ability to adapt to changing circumstances. Your answer should demonstrate that you can make quick decisions and implement them effectively.

Example: “I recently had an experience where I was tasked with quickly pivoting due to changing customer demands. I was working on a project for a client that required us to develop a new product from scratch. We had been working on the project for several months and were close to launching when we received feedback from our customers that they wanted something different.

In order to meet their needs, I had to pivot quickly and come up with a plan to adjust the project timeline and design. I worked closely with my team to brainstorm ideas and create a strategy to make the necessary changes in a timely manner. We also reached out to our customers to get more information about what they needed and how we could best meet those requirements.

Ultimately, we were able to successfully pivot and launch the product within the original timeline. This experience showed me the importance of being agile and responsive to customer needs. It also demonstrated my ability to think strategically and work collaboratively with my team to find creative solutions to challenging problems.”

23. Are there any particular technologies that you think are essential for innovating?

This question can help the interviewer get a sense of your knowledge about innovation and how you approach it. Your answer should include some information about which technologies you think are important for innovating, along with an explanation as to why they’re essential.

Example: “Yes, there are certain technologies that I think are essential for innovating. First and foremost is data analysis. Having the ability to collect, analyze, and interpret data is key in understanding customer needs and trends, which can help inform new ideas and solutions.

In addition, having a platform or tool that allows teams to collaborate on projects remotely is also important. This could be something like an online project management software or a virtual whiteboard. It’s important to have a way for team members to easily communicate with each other and share their ideas.

Lastly, having access to tools that enable rapid prototyping and testing of ideas is critical for innovation. This could include things like 3D printing, CAD software, or even artificial intelligence algorithms. These tools allow us to quickly create prototypes and test them out before investing too much time or resources into a concept.”

24. How would you go about developing a plan to increase customer engagement?

An interviewer may ask this question to learn more about your customer engagement strategies. Use examples from previous roles where you developed plans or strategies to increase customer engagement and loyalty.

Example: “When it comes to developing a plan to increase customer engagement, I believe the most important step is to first understand the needs of the customers. This means taking the time to research and analyze their current behaviors and preferences. By doing this, we can identify areas where there is potential for improvement or opportunities to create new experiences that will drive more engagement.

Once we have identified these areas, I would then work with the team to develop an actionable plan. This could include creating targeted campaigns to reach out to existing customers, as well as exploring new channels such as social media or email marketing to reach potential new customers. We would also need to consider how to measure success so that we can track our progress and make adjustments if needed.”

25. What strategies have you used to stay ahead of competitors in terms of innovation?

This question can help the interviewer gain insight into your innovative thinking and problem-solving skills. Use examples from past experiences to highlight how you used innovation to stay ahead of competitors in terms of product development, customer service or other areas that are relevant to this role.

Example: “I have a strong track record of staying ahead of competitors in terms of innovation. I believe that the key to success is to stay one step ahead of the competition by anticipating their next move and being prepared with innovative solutions. To do this, I focus on understanding industry trends and customer needs. By doing so, I can identify opportunities for new products or services that will give my company an edge over our competitors.

Additionally, I am always looking for ways to improve existing processes and products. This includes researching emerging technologies and exploring how they could be used to create more efficient operations or better user experiences. Finally, I make sure to keep up-to-date with what other companies are doing in the space, as well as attending conferences and networking events to get ideas from outside sources. All of these strategies help me stay ahead of the competition and ensure that my organization remains at the forefront of innovation.”

25 CRM Specialist Interview Questions and Answers

25 surgeon interview questions and answers, you may also be interested in..., 17 litigation support analyst interview questions and answers, 20 3rd grade teacher interview questions and answers, 25 marketing specialist interview questions and answers, 17 custodial manager interview questions and answers.

• Open access
• Published: 28 March 2024

Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients’ perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis

• John A Bourke 1 , 2 , 3 ,
• K. Anne Sinnott Jerram 1 , 2 ,
• Mohit Arora 1 , 2 ,
• Ashley Craig 1 , 2 &
• James W Middleton 1 , 2 , 4 , 5  

BMC Health Services Research volume  24 , Article number:  390 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

164 Accesses

Metrics details

Despite advances in managing secondary health complications after spinal cord injury (SCI), challenges remain in developing targeted community health strategies. In response, the SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT) was developed between 2018 and 2023 in NSW, Australia to support people with SCI and their general practitioners (GPs) to promote better community self-management. Successful implementation of innovations such as the SCI-HMT are determined by a range of contextual factors, including the perspectives of the innovation recipients for whom the innovation is intended to benefit, who are rarely included in the implementation process. During the digitizing of the booklet version of the SCI-HMT into a website and App, we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a tool to guide collection and analysis of qualitative data from a range of innovation recipients to promote equity and to inform actionable findings designed to improve the implementation of the SCI-HMT.

Data from twenty-three innovation recipients in the development phase of the SCI-HMT were coded to the five CFIR domains to inform a semi-structured interview guide. This interview guide was used to prospectively explore the barriers and facilitators to planned implementation of the digital SCI-HMT with six health professionals and four people with SCI. A team including researchers and innovation recipients then interpreted these data to produce a reflective statement matched to each domain. Each reflective statement prefaced an actionable finding, defined as alterations that can be made to a program to improve its adoption into practice.

Five reflective statements synthesizing all participant data and linked to an actionable finding to improve the implementation plan were created. Using the CFIR to guide our research emphasized how partnership is the key theme connecting all implementation facilitators, for example ensuring that the tone, scope, content and presentation of the SCI-HMT balanced the needs of innovation recipients alongside the provision of evidence-based clinical information.

Conclusions

Understanding recipient perspectives is an essential contextual factor to consider when developing implementation strategies for healthcare innovations. The revised CFIR provided an effective, systematic method to understand, integrate and value recipient perspectives in the development of an implementation strategy for the SCI-HMT.

Trial registration

Peer Review reports

Injury to the spinal cord can occur through traumatic causes (e.g., falls or motor vehicle accidents) or from non-traumatic disease or disorder (e.g., tumours or infections) [ 1 ]. The onset of a spinal cord injury (SCI) is often sudden, yet the consequences are lifelong. The impact of a SCI is devastating, with effects on sensory and motor function, bladder and bowel function, sexual function, level of independence, community participation and quality of life [ 2 ]. In order to maintain good health, wellbeing and productivity in society, people with SCI must develop self-management skills and behaviours to manage their newly acquired chronic health condition [ 3 ]. Given the increasing emphasis on primary health care and community management of chronic health conditions, like SCI, there is a growing responsibility on all parties to promote good health practices and minimize the risks of common health complications in their communities.

To address this need, the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT) was co-designed between 2018 and 2023 with people living with SCI and their General Practitioners (GPs) in NSW, Australia [ 4 ] The aim of the SCI-HMT is to support self-management of the most common and arguably avoidable potentially life-threatening complications associated with SCI, such as mental health crises, autonomic dysreflexia, kidney infections and pressure injuries. The SCI-HMT provides comprehensible information with resources about the six highest priority health areas related to SCI (as indicated by people with SCI and GPs) and was developed over two phases. Phase 1 focused on developing a booklet version and Phase 2 focused on digitizing this content into a website and smartphone app [ 4 , 5 ].

Enabling the successful implementation of evidence-based innovations such as the SCI-HMT is inevitably influenced by contextual factors: those dynamic and diverse array of forces within real-world settings working for or against implementation efforts [ 6 ]. Contextual factors often include background environmental elements in which an intervention is situated, for example (but not limited to) demographics, clinical environments, organisational culture, legislation, and cultural norms [ 7 ]. Understanding the wider context is necessary to identify and potentially mitigate various challenges to the successful implementation of those innovations. Such work is the focus of determinant frameworks, which focus on categorising or classing groups of contextual determinants that are thought to predict or demonstrate an effect on implementation effectiveness to better understand factors that might influence implementation outcomes [ 8 ].

One of the most highly cited determinant frameworks is the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [ 9 ], which is often posited as an ideal framework for pre-implementation preparation. Originally published in 2009, the CFIR has recently been subject to an update by its original authors, which included a literature review, survey of users, and the creation of an outcome addendum [ 10 , 11 ]. A key contribution from this revision was the need for a greater focus on the place of innovation recipients, defined as the constituency for whom the innovation is being designed to benefit; for example, patients receiving treatment, students receiving a learning activity. Traditionally, innovation recipients are rarely positioned as key decision-makers or innovation implementers [ 8 ], and as a consequence, have not often been included in the application of research using frameworks, such as the CFIR [ 11 ].

Such power imbalances within the intersection of healthcare and research, particularly between those receiving and delivering such services and those designing such services, have been widely reported [ 12 , 13 ]. There are concerted efforts within health service development, health research and health research funding, to rectify this power imbalance [ 14 , 15 ]. Importantly, such efforts to promote increased equitable population impact are now being explicitly discussed within the implementation science literature. For example, Damschroder et al. [ 11 ] has recently argued for researchers to use the CFIR to collect data from innovation recipients, and that, ultimately, “equitable population impact is only possible when recipients are integrally involved in implementation and all key constituencies share power and make decisions together” (p. 7). Indeed, increased equity between key constituencies and partnering with innovation recipients promotes the likelihood of sustainable adoption of an innovation [ 4 , 12 , 14 ].

There is a paucity of work using the updated CFIR to include and understand innovation recipients’ perspectives. To address this gap, this paper reports on a process of using the CFIR to guide the collection of qualitative data from a range of innovation recipients within a wider co-design mixed methods study examining the development and implementation of SCI-HMT. The innovation recipients in our research are people living with SCI and GPs. Guided by the CFIR domains (shown in the supplementary material), we used reflexive thematic analysis [ 16 ]to summarize data into reflective summaries, which served to inform actionable findings designed to improve implementation of the SCI-HMT.

The procedure for this research is multi-stepped and is summarized in Fig.  1 . First, we mapped retrospective qualitative data collected during the development of the SCI-HMT [ 4 ] against the five domains of the CFIR in order to create a semi-structured interview guide (Step 1). Then, we used this interview guide to collect prospective data from health professionals and people with SCI during the development of the digital version of the SCI-HMT (Step 2) to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. This enabled us to interpret a reflective summary statement for each CFIR domain. Lastly, we developed an actionable finding for each domain summary. The first (RESP/18/212) and second phase (2019/ETH13961) of the project received ethical approval from The Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The reporting of this study was conducted in line with the consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines [ 17 ]. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Procedure of synthesising datasets to inform reflective statements and actionable findings. a Two health professionals had a SCI (one being JAB); b Two co-design researchers had a SCI (one being JAB)

Step one: retrospective data collection and analysis

We began by retrospectively analyzing the data set (interview and focus group transcripts) from the previously reported qualitative study from the development phase of the SCI-HMT [ 4 ]. This analysis was undertaken by two team members (KASJ and MA). KASJ has a background in co-design research. Transcript data were uploaded into NVivo software (Version 12: QSR International Pty Ltd) and a directed content analysis approach [ 18 ] was applied to analyze categorized data a priori according to the original 2009 CFIR domains (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process of implementation) described by Damschroder et al. [ 9 ]. This categorized data were summarized and informed the specific questions of a semi-structured interview guide. The final output of step one was an interview guide with context-specific questions arranged according to the CFIR domains (see supplementary file 1). The interview was tested with two people with SCI and one health professional.

Step two: prospective data collection and analysis

In the second step, semi-structured interviews were conducted by KASJ (with MA as observer) with consenting healthcare professionals who had previously contributed to the development of the SCI-HMT. Healthcare professionals included GPs, Nurse Consultants, Specialist Physiotherapists, along with Health Researchers (one being JAB). In addition, a focus group was conducted with consenting individuals with SCI who had contributed to the SCI-HMT design and development phase. The interview schedule designed in step one above guided data collection in all interviews and the focus group.

The focus group and interviews were conducted online, audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and uploaded to NVivo software (Version 12: QSR International Pty Ltd). All data were subject to reflexive, inductive and deductive thematic analysis [ 16 , 19 ] to better understand participants’ perspectives regarding the potential implementation of the SCI-HMT. First, one team member (KASJ) read transcripts and began a deductive analysis whereby data were organized into CFIR domains-specific dataset. Second, KASJ and JAB analyzed this domain-specific dataset to inductively interpret a reflective statement which served to summarise all participant responses to each domain. The final output of step two was a reflective summary statement for each CFIR domain.

Step three: data synthesis

In the third step we aimed to co-create an actionable finding (defined as tangible alteration that can be made to a program, in this case the SCI-HMT [ 20 ]) based on each domain-specific reflective statement. To achieve this, three codesign researchers (KAS and JAB with one person with SCI from Step 2 (deidentified)) focused on operationalising each reflective statement into a recommended modification for the digital version of the SCI-HMT. This was an iterative process guided by the specific CFIR domain and construct definitions, which we deemed salient and relevant to each reflective statement (see Table  2 for example). Data synthesis involved line by line analysis, group discussion, and repeated refinement of actionable findings. A draft synthesis was shared with SCI-HMT developers (JWM and MA) and refinement continued until consensus was agreed on. The final outputs of step three were an actionable finding related to each reflective statement for each CFIR domain.

The characteristics of both the retrospective and prospective study participants are shown in Table  1 . The retrospective data included data from a total of 23 people: 19 people with SCI and four GPs. Of the 19 people with SCI, 12 participated in semi-structured interviews, seven participated in the first focus group, and four returned to the second focus group. In step 2, four people with SCI participated in a focus group and six healthcare professionals participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Two of the healthcare professionals (a GP and a registrar) had lived experience of SCI, as did one researcher (JAB). All interviews and focus groups were conducted either online or in-person and ranged in length between 60 and 120 min.

In our overall synthesis, we actively interpreted five reflective statements based on the updated CFIR domain and construct definitions by Damschroder et al. [ 11 ]. Table  2 provides a summary of how we linked the updated CFIR domain and construct definitions to the reflective statements. We demonstrate this process of co-creation below, including illustrative quotes from participants. Importantly, we guide readers to the actionable findings related to each reflective statement in Table  2 . Each actionable statement represents an alteration that can be made to a program to improve its adoption into practice.

Participants acknowledged that self-management is a major undertaking and very demanding, as one person with SCI said, “ we need to be informed without being terrified and overwhelmed”. Participants felt the HMT could indeed be adapted, tailored, refined, or reinvented to meet local needs. For example, another person with SCI remarked:

“Education needs to be from the get-go but in bite sized pieces from all quarters when readiness is most apparent… at all time points , [not just as a] a newbie tool or for people with [long-term impairment] ” (person with SCI_02).

Therefore, the SCI-HMT had to balance complexity of content while still being accessible and engaging, and required input from both experts in the field and those with lived experience of SCI, for example, a clinical nurse specialist suggested:

“it’s essential [the SCI-HMT] is written by experts in the field as well as with collaboration with people who have had a, you know, the lived experience of SCI” (healthcare professional_03).

Furthermore, the points of contact with healthcare for a person with SCI can be challenging to navigate and the SCI-HMT has the potential to facilitate a smoother engagement process and improve communication between people with SCI and healthcare services. As a GP suggested:

“we need a tool like this to link to that pathway model in primary health care , [the SCI-HMT] it’s a great tool, something that everyone can read and everyone’s reading the same thing” (healthcare professional_05).

Participants highlighted that the ability of the SCI-HMT to facilitate effective communication was very much dependent on the delivery format. The idea of digitizing the SCI-HMT garnered equal support from people with SCI and health care professionals, with one participant with SCI deeming it to be “ essential” ( person with SCI_01) and a health professional suggesting a “digitalized version will be an advantage for most people” (healthcare professional_02).

Outer setting

There was strong interest expressed by both people with SCI and healthcare professionals in using the SCI-HMT. The fundamental premise was that knowledge is power and the SCI-HMT would have strong utility in post-acute rehabilitation services, as well as primary care. As a person with SCI said,

“ we need to leave the [spinal unit] to return to the community with sufficient knowledge, and to know the value of that knowledge and then need to ensure primary healthcare provider [s] are best informed” (person with SCI_04).

The value of the SCI-HMT in facilitating clear and effective communication and shared decision-making between healthcare professionals and people with SCI was also highlighted, as shown by the remarks of an acute nurse specialist:

“I think this tool is really helpful for the consumer and the GP to work together to prioritize particular tests that a patient might need and what the regularity of that is” (healthcare professional_03).

Engaging with SCI peer support networks to promote the SCI-HMT was considered crucial, as one person with SCI emphasized when asked how the SCI-HMT might be best executed in the community, “…peers, peers and peers” (person with SCI_01). Furthermore, the layering of content made possible in the digitalized version will allow for the issue of approachability in terms of readiness for change, as another person with SCI said:

“[putting content into a digital format] is essential and required and there is a need to put summarized content in an App with links to further web-based information… it’s not likely to be accessed otherwise” (person with SCI_02).

Inner setting

Participants acknowledged that self-management of health and well-being is substantial and demanding. It was suggested that the scope, tone, and complexity of the SCI-HMT, while necessary, could potentially be resisted by people with SCI if they felt overwhelmed, as one person with SCI described:

“a manual that is really long and wordy, like, it’s [a] health metric… they maybe lack the health literacy to, to consume the content then yes, it would impede their readiness for [self-management]” (person with SCI_02).

Having support from their GPs was considered essential, and the HMT could enable GP’s, who are under time pressure, to provide more effective health and advice to their patients, as one GP said:

“We GP’s are time poor, if you realize then when you’re time poor you look quickly to say oh this is a patient tool - how can I best use this?” (healthcare professional_05).

Furthermore, health professional skills may be best used with the synthesis of self-reported symptoms, behaviors, or observations. A particular strength of a digitized version would be its ability to facilitate more streamlined communication between a person with SCI and their primary healthcare providers developing healthcare plans, as an acute nurse specialist reflected, “ I think that a digitalized version is essential with links to primary healthcare plans” (healthcare professional_03).

Efficient communication with thorough assessment is essential to ensure serious health issues are not missed, as findings reinforce that the SCI-HMT is an educational tool, not a replacement for healthcare services, as a clinical nurse specialist commented, “ remember, things will go wrong– people end up very sick and in acute care “ (healthcare professional_02).

The SCI-HMT has the potential to provide a pathway to a ‘hope for better than now’ , a hope to ‘remain well’ and a hope to ‘be happy’ , as the informant with SCI (04) declared, “self-management is a long game, if you’re keeping well, you’ve got that possibility of a good life… of happiness”. Participants with SCI felt the tool needed to be genuine and

“acknowledge the huge amount of adjustment required, recognizing that dealing with SCI issues is required to survive and live a good life” (person with SCI_04).

However, there is a risk that an individual is completely overwhelmed by the scale of the SCI-HMT content and the requirement for lifelong vigilance. Careful attention and planning were paid to layering the information accordingly to support self-management as a ‘long game’, which one person with SCI reflected in following:

“the first 2–3 year [period] is probably the toughest to get your head around the learning stuff, because you’ve got to a stage where you’re levelling out, and you’ve kind of made these promises to yourself and then you realize that there’s no quick fix” (person with SCI_01).

It was decided that this could be achieved by providing concrete examples and anecdotes from people with SCI illustrating that a meaningful, healthy life is possible, and that good health is the bedrock of a good life with SCI.

There was universal agreement that the SCI-HMT is aspirational and that it has the potential to improve knowledge and understanding for people with SCI, their families, community workers/carers and primary healthcare professionals, as a GP remarked:

“[different groups] could just read it and realize, ‘Ahh, OK that’s what that means… when you’re doing catheters. That’s what you mean when you’re talking about bladder and bowel function or skin care” (healthcare professional_04).

Despite the SCI-HMT providing an abundance of information and resources to support self-management, participants identified four gaps: (i) the priority issue of sexuality, including pleasure and identity, as one person with SCI remarked:

“ sexuality is one of the biggest issues that people with SCI often might not speak about that often cause you know it’s awkward for them. So yeah, I think that’s a that’s a serious issue” (person with SCI_03).

(ii) consideration of the taboo nature of bladder and bowel topics for indigenous people, (iii) urgent need to ensure links for SCI-HMT care plans are compatible with patient management systems, and (iv) exercise and leisure as a standalone topic taking account of effects of physical activity, including impact on mental health and wellbeing but more especially for fun.

To ensure longevity of the SCI-HMT, maintaining a partnership between people with SCI, SCI community groups and both primary and tertiary health services is required for liaison with the relevant professional bodies, care agencies, funders, policy makers and tertiary care settings to ensure ongoing education and promotion of SCI-HMT is maintained. For example, delivery of ongoing training of healthcare professionals to both increase the knowledge base of primary healthcare providers in relation to SCI, and to promote use of the tools and resources through health communities. As a community nurse specialist suggested:

“ improving knowledge in the health community… would require digital links to clinical/health management platforms” (healthcare professional_02).

In a similar vein, a GP suggested:

“ our common GP body would have continuing education requirements… especially if it’s online, in particular for the rural, rural doctors who you know, might find it hard to get into the city” (healthcare professional_04).

The successful implementation of evidence-based innovations into practice is dependent on a wide array of dynamic and active contextual factors, including the perspectives of the recipients who are destined to use such innovations. Indeed, the recently updated CFIR has called for innovation recipient perspectives to be a priority when considering contextual factors [ 10 , 11 ]. Understanding and including the perspectives of those the innovation is being designed to benefit can promote increased equity and validation of recipient populations, and potentially increase the adoption and sustainability of innovations.

In this paper, we have presented research using the recently updated CFIR to guide the collection of innovation recipients’ perspectives (including people with SCI and GPs working in the community) regarding the potential implementation barriers and facilitators of the digital version of the SCI-HMT. Collected data were synthesized to inform actionable findings– tangible ways in which the SCI-HMT could be modified according of the domains of the CFIR (e.g., see Keith et al. [ 20 ]). It is important to note that we conducted this research using the original domains of the CFIR [ 9 ] prior to Damschroder et al. publishing the updated CFIR [ 11 ]. However, in our analysis we were able to align our findings to the revised CFIR domains and constructs, as Damschroder [ 11 ] suggests, constructs can “be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency” (p. 13).

One of the most poignant findings from our analyses was the need to ensure the content of the SCI-HMT balanced scientific evidence and clinical expertise with lived experience knowledge. This balance of clinical and experiential knowledge demonstrated genuine regard for lived experience knowledge, and created a more accessible, engaging, useable platform. For example, in the innovation and individual domains, the need to include lived experience quotes was immediately apparent once the perspective of people with SCI was included. It was highlighted that while the SCI-HMT will prove useful to many parties at various stages along the continuum of care following onset of SCI, there will be those individuals that are overwhelmed by the scale of the content. That said, the layering of information facilitated by the digitalized version is intended to provide an ease of navigation through the SCI-HMT and enable a far greater sense of control over personal health and wellbeing. Further, despite concerns regarding e-literacy the digitalized version of the SCI-HMT is seen as imperative for accessibility given the wide geographic diversity and recent COVID pandemic [ 21 ]. While there will be people who are challenged by the technology, the universally acceptable use of the internet is seen as less of a barrier than printed material.

The concept of partnership was also apparent within the data analysis focusing on the outer and inner setting domains. In the outer setting domain, our findings emphasized the importance of engaging with SCI community groups, as well as primary and tertiary care providers to maximize uptake at all points in time from the phase of subacute rehabilitation onwards. While the SCI-HMT is intended for use across the continuum of care from post-acute rehabilitation onwards, it may be that certain modules are more relevant at different times, and could serve as key resources during the hand over between acute care, inpatient rehabilitation and community reintegration.

Likewise, findings regarding the inner setting highlighted the necessity of a productive partnership between GPs and individuals with SCI to address the substantial demands of long-term self-management of health and well-being following SCI. Indeed, support is crucial, especially when self-management is the focus. This is particularly so in individuals living with complex disability following survival after illness or injury [ 22 ], where health literacy has been found to be a primary determinant of successful health and wellbeing outcomes [ 23 ]. For people with SCI, this tool potentially holds the most appeal when an individual is ready and has strong partnerships and supportive communication. This can enable potential red flags to be recognized earlier allowing timely intervention to avert health crises, promoting individual well-being, and reducing unnecessary demands on health services.

While the SCI-HMT is an educational tool and not meant to replace health services, findings suggest the current structure would lead nicely to having the conversation with a range of likely support people, including SCI peers, friends and family, GP, community nurses, carers or via on-line support services. The findings within the process domain underscored the importance of ongoing partnership between innovation implementers and a broad array of innovation recipients (e.g., individuals with SCI, healthcare professionals, family, funding agencies and policy-makers). This emphasis on partnership also addresses recent discussions regarding equity and the CFIR. For example, Damschroder et al. [ 11 ] suggests that innovation recipients are too often not included in the CFIR process, as the CFIR is primarily seen as a tool intended “to collect data from individuals who have power and/or influence over implementation outcomes” (p. 5).

Finally, we feel that our inclusion of innovation recipients’ perspectives presented in this article begins to address the notion of equity in implementation, whereby the inclusion of recipient perspectives in research using the CFIR both validates, and increases, the likelihood of sustainable adoption of evidence-based innovations, such as the SCI-HMT. We have used the CFIR in a pragmatic way with an emphasis on meaningful engagement between the innovation recipients and the research team, heeding the call from Damschroder et al. [ 11 ], who recently argued for researchers to use the CFIR to collect data from innovation recipients. Adopting this approach enabled us to give voice to innovation recipient perspectives and subsequently ensure that the tone, scope, content and presentation of the SCI-HMT balanced the needs of innovation recipients alongside the provision of evidence-based clinical information.

Our research is not without limitations. While our study was successful in identifying a number of potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the SCI-HMT, we did not test any implementation strategies to impact determinants, mechanisms, or outcomes. This will be the focus of future research on this project, which will investigate the impact of implementation strategies on outcomes. Focus will be given to the context-mechanism configurations which give rise to particular outcomes for different groups in certain circumstances [ 7 , 24 ]. A second potential concern is the relatively small sample size of participants that may not allow for saturation and generalizability of the findings. However, both the significant impact of secondary health complications for people with SCI and the desire for a health maintenance tool have been established in Australia [ 2 , 4 ]. The aim our study reported in this article was to achieve context-specific knowledge of a small sample that shares a particular mutual experience and represents a perspective, rather than a population [ 25 , 26 ]. We feel our findings can stimulate discussion and debate regarding participant-informed approaches to implementation of the SCI-HMT, which can then be subject to larger-sample studies to determine their generalisability, that is, their external validity. Notably, future research could examine the interaction between certain demographic differences (e.g., gender) of people with SCI and potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the SCI-HMT. Future research could also include the perspectives of other allied health professionals working in the community, such as occupational therapists. Lastly, while our research gave significant priority to recipient viewpoints, research in this space would benefit for ensuring innovation recipients are engaged as genuine partners throughout the entire research process from conceptualization to implementation.

Employing the CFIR provided an effective, systematic method for identifying recipient perspectives regarding the implementation of a digital health maintenance tool for people living with SCI. Findings emphasized the need to balance clinical and lived experience perspectives when designing an implementation strategy and facilitating strong partnerships with necessary stakeholders to maximise the uptake of SCI-HMT into practice. Ongoing testing will monitor the uptake and implementation of this innovation, specifically focusing on how the SCI-HMT works for different users, in different contexts, at different stages and times of the rehabilitation journey.

Data availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available available upon request and with permission gained from the project Steering Committee.

Abbreviations

spinal cord injury

HMT-Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Kirshblum S, Vernon WL. Spinal Cord Medicine, Third Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2018.

Middleton JW, Arora M, Kifley A, Clark J, Borg SJ, Tran Y, et al. Australian arm of the International spinal cord Injury (Aus-InSCI) Community Survey: 2. Understanding the lived experience in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(12):1069–79.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Craig A, Nicholson Perry K, Guest R, Tran Y, Middleton J. Adjustment following chronic spinal cord injury: determining factors that contribute to social participation. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20(4):807–23.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Middleton JW, Arora M, Jerram KAS, Bourke J, McCormick M, O’Leary D, et al. Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to support Self-Management: a mixed-methods Approach. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2024;30(1):59–73.

Article   Google Scholar  

Middleton JW, Arora M, McCormick M, O’Leary D. Health maintenance Tool: how to stay healthy and well with a spinal cord injury. A tool for consumers by consumers. 1st ed. Sydney, NSW Australia: Royal Rehab and The University of Sydney; 2020.

Google Scholar  

Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):189.

Jagosh J. Realist synthesis for Public Health: building an Ontologically Deep understanding of how Programs Work, for whom, and in which contexts. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40(1):361–72.

Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.

Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Opra Widerquist MA, Lowery JC. Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR outcomes Addendum. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):7.

Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery JC. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75.

Plamondon K, Ndumbe-Eyoh S, Shahram S. 2.2 Equity, Power, and Transformative Research Coproduction. Research Co-Production in Healthcare2022. p. 34–53.

Verville L, Cancelliere C, Connell G, Lee J, Munce S, Mior S, et al. Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):926.

Gainforth HL, Hoekstra F, McKay R, McBride CB, Sweet SN, Martin Ginis KA, et al. Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding principles for conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(4):656–63.

Langley J, Knowles SE, Ward V. Conducting a Research Coproduction Project. Research Co-Production in Healthcare2022. p. 112– 28.

Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2020:1–25.

Tong A, Sainsbury p, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qulaitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.

Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016;2:8–14.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.

Keith RE, Crosson JC, O’Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Science: IS. 2017;12(1):15.

Choukou M-A, Sanchez-Ramirez DC, Pol M, Uddin M, Monnin C, Syed-Abdul S. COVID-19 infodemic and digital health literacy in vulnerable populations: a scoping review. Digit HEALTH. 2022;8:20552076221076927.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Daniels N. Just Health: Meeting Health needs fairly. Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 397.

Parker SM, Stocks N, Nutbeam D, Thomas L, Denney-Wilson E, Zwar N, et al. Preventing chronic disease in patients with low health literacy using eHealth and teamwork in primary healthcare: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e023239–e.

Salter KL, Kothari A. Using realist evaluation to open the black box of knowledge translation: a state-of-the-art review. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):115.

Sebele-Mpofu FY. The Sampling Conundrum in qualitative research: can Saturation help alleviate the controversy and alleged subjectivity in Sampling? Int’l J Soc Sci Stud. 2021;9:11.

Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by Information Power. Qual Health Res. 2015;26(13):1753–60.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors of this study would like to thank all the consumers with SCI and healthcare professionals for their invaluable contribution to this project. Their participation and insights have been instrumental in shaping the development of the SCI-HMT. The team also acknowledges the support and guidance provided by the members of the Project Steering Committee, as well as the partner organisations, including NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, and icare NSW. Author would also like to acknowledge the informant group with lived experience, whose perspectives have enriched our understanding and informed the development of SCI-HMT.

The SCI Wellness project was a collaborative project between John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research at The University of Sydney and Royal Rehab. Both organizations provided in-kind support to the project. Additionally, the University of Sydney and Royal Rehab received research funding from Insurance and Care NSW (icare NSW) to undertake the SCI Wellness Project. icare NSW do not take direct responsibility for any of the following: study design, data collection, drafting of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

John A Bourke, K. Anne Sinnott Jerram, Mohit Arora, Ashley Craig & James W Middleton

The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Burwood Academy Trust, Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

John A Bourke

Royal Rehab, Ryde, NSW, Australia

James W Middleton

State Spinal Cord Injury Service, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Project conceptualization: KASJ, MA, JWM; project methodology: JWM, MA, KASJ, JAB; data collection: KASJ and MA; data analysis: KASJ, JAB, MA, JWM; writing—original draft preparation: JAB; writing—review and editing: JAB, KASJ, JWM, MA, AC; funding acquisition: JWM, MA. All authors contributed to the revision of the paper and approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A Bourke .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The first (RESP/18/212) and second phase (2019/ETH13961) of the project received ethical approval from The Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. All participants provided informed, written consent. All data were to be retained for 7 years (23rd May 2030).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MA part salary (from Dec 2018 to Dec 2023), KASJ part salary (July 2021 to Dec 2023) and JAB part salary (Jan 2022 to Aug 2022) was paid from the grant monies. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Bourke, J.A., Jerram, K.A.S., Arora, M. et al. Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients’ perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 24 , 390 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x

Download citation

Received : 14 August 2023

Accepted : 11 March 2024

Published : 28 March 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Spinal Cord injury
• Self-management
• Innovation recipients
• Secondary health conditions
• Primary health care
• Evidence-based innovations
• Actionable findings
• Consolidated Framework for implementation research

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

• General enquiries: [email protected]

The use and impact of surveillance-based technology initiatives in inpatient and acute mental health settings: A systematic review

• Find this author on Google Scholar
• Find this author on PubMed
• Search for this author on this site
• ORCID record for Jessica L. Griffiths
• For correspondence: [email protected]
• ORCID record for Katherine R. K. Saunders
• ORCID record for Una Foye
• ORCID record for Anna Greenburgh
• ORCID record for Antonio Rojas-Garcia
• ORCID record for Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
• ORCID record for Sonia Johnson
• ORCID record for Alan Simpson
• Info/History
• Supplementary material
• Preview PDF

Background: The use of surveillance technologies is becoming increasingly common in inpatient mental health settings, commonly justified as efforts to improve safety and cost-effectiveness. However, the use of these technologies has been questioned in light of limited research conducted and the sensitivities, ethical concerns and potential harms of surveillance. This systematic review aims to: 1) map how surveillance technologies have been employed in inpatient mental health settings, 2) identify any best practice guidance, 3) explore how they are experienced by patients, staff and carers, and 4) examine evidence regarding their impact. Methods: We searched five academic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, PubMed and Scopus), one grey literature database (HMIC) and two pre-print servers (medRxiv and PsyArXiv) to identify relevant papers published up to 18/09/2023. We also conducted backwards and forwards citation tracking and contacted experts to identify relevant literature. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach. Results: A total of 27 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Included studies reported on CCTV/video monitoring (n = 13), Vision-Based Patient Monitoring and Management (VBPMM) (n = 6), Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) (n = 4), GPS electronic monitoring (n = 2) and wearable sensors (n = 2). Twelve papers (44.4%) were rated as low quality, five (18.5%) medium quality, and ten (37.0%) high quality. Five studies (18.5%) declared a conflict of interest. We identified minimal best practice guidance. Qualitative findings indicate that patient, staff and carer perceptions and experiences of surveillance technologies are mixed and complex. Quantitative findings regarding the impact of surveillance on outcomes such as self-harm, violence, aggression, care quality and cost-effectiveness were inconsistent or weak. Discussion: There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that surveillance technologies in inpatient mental health settings are achieving the outcomes they are employed to achieve, such as improving safety and reducing costs. The studies were generally of low methodological quality, lacked lived experience involvement, and a substantial proportion (18.5%) declared conflicts of interest. Further independent coproduced research is needed to more comprehensively evaluate the impact of surveillance technologies in inpatient settings, including harms and benefits. If surveillance technologies are to be implemented, it will be important to engage all key stakeholders in the development of policies, procedures and best practice guidance to regulate their use, with a particular emphasis on prioritising the perspectives of patients.

Competing Interest Statement

AS and UF have undertaken and published research on BWCs. We have received no financial support from BWC or any other surveillance technology companies. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical Protocols

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=463993

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme (grant no. PR-PRU-0916-22003). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ARG was supported by the Ramon y Cajal programme (RYC2022-038556-I), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Data Availability

The template data extraction form is available in Supplementary 1. MMAT quality appraisal ratings for each included study are available in Supplementary 2. All data used is publicly available in the published papers included in this review.

View the discussion thread.

Supplementary Material

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Citation Manager Formats

• EndNote (tagged)
• EndNote 8 (xml)
• RefWorks Tagged
• Ref Manager
• Tweet Widget
• Facebook Like
• Google Plus One
• Addiction Medicine (316)
• Allergy and Immunology (617)
• Anesthesia (159)
• Cardiovascular Medicine (2276)
• Dentistry and Oral Medicine (279)
• Dermatology (201)
• Emergency Medicine (370)
• Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (798)
• Epidemiology (11573)
• Forensic Medicine (10)
• Gastroenterology (678)
• Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3575)
• Geriatric Medicine (336)
• Health Economics (616)
• Health Informatics (2304)
• Health Policy (913)
• Health Systems and Quality Improvement (863)
• Hematology (335)
• HIV/AIDS (752)
• Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13149)
• Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (755)
• Medical Education (359)
• Medical Ethics (100)
• Nephrology (388)
• Neurology (3346)
• Nursing (191)
• Nutrition (506)
• Obstetrics and Gynecology (651)
• Occupational and Environmental Health (645)
• Oncology (1756)
• Ophthalmology (524)
• Orthopedics (209)
• Otolaryngology (284)
• Pain Medicine (223)
• Palliative Medicine (66)
• Pathology (437)
• Pediatrics (1001)
• Pharmacology and Therapeutics (422)
• Primary Care Research (406)
• Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3058)
• Public and Global Health (5983)
• Radiology and Imaging (1221)
• Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (714)
• Respiratory Medicine (811)
• Rheumatology (367)
• Sexual and Reproductive Health (350)
• Sports Medicine (316)
• Surgery (386)
• Toxicology (50)
• Transplantation (170)
• Urology (142)

30 Director Of Research And Development Interview Questions and Answers

Common Director Of Research And Development interview questions, how to answer them, and example answers from a certified career coach.

Stepping into the role of a Director of Research and Development is no small feat. This position requires not just extensive knowledge in your field, but also exceptional leadership skills, strategic thinking, and an innovative mindset. As you ready yourself to sit across from potential employers during your interview, it’s essential to prepare for questions that will probe deep into these areas.

In this comprehensive guide, we delve into common interview questions for the Director of Research and Development role. Accompanied by expertly crafted responses, our aim is to provide you with key insights to help present yourself as the visionary leader any top-tier organization would be eager to bring onboard.

1. Can you describe a time when you successfully commercialized a product from research and development?

This question is designed to assess your practical experience in transforming an idea from the research stage into a market-ready product. It’s no small feat – it requires a keen understanding of market demands, technical feasibility, and project management. Moreover, it provides the interviewer with an insight into your strategic planning skills, your ability to foresee potential challenges, and your capacity to work with various teams to achieve a common goal.

Example: “At my previous company, we developed a new software solution for data analysis. I led the team that was responsible for transitioning this product from R&D to commercialization.

During the development phase, we ensured that customer feedback was incorporated into the design process. This helped us create a product that met market needs and expectations.

Once the product was ready, we worked closely with marketing and sales teams to develop an effective go-to-market strategy. We also provided training sessions to ensure they understood the product’s features and benefits.

The result was a successful product launch, with positive customer reviews and significant sales growth. This experience taught me the importance of cross-functional collaboration in successfully commercializing a product.”

2. How would you balance the needs of the business with the demands of scientific exploration and innovation?

This question is designed to assess your strategic and practical thinking as a potential Director of Research and Development. Balancing business needs with the demands of scientific innovation is a key aspect of this role. You’re expected to drive advancement while staying within budget constraints and meeting company goals. Hence, demonstrating your ability to strike the right balance can help convince the interviewer of your suitability for the position.

Example: “Balancing business needs with scientific exploration requires a strategic approach. It’s about aligning research goals with the company’s mission and market demands.

Innovation should be directed towards creating products or solutions that meet customer needs, drive revenue growth, and enhance competitiveness. However, it’s also vital to maintain an environment where creativity and curiosity flourish for long-term advancements.

Regular communication between departments can ensure alignment and foster understanding of how each project contributes to overall objectives. By setting clear expectations and milestones, we can measure progress effectively without stifling innovation.”

3. Can you provide an example of a time when you had to manage a research project with limited resources?

Resource allocation is a significant part of any leadership role, but it’s especially important in research and development where your results can directly affect your company’s future. With this question, hiring managers want to see that you’re capable of making tough decisions that involve trade-offs, and that you can deliver results no matter what constraints are put on your team.

Example: “During a project on developing a new product line, our budget was significantly reduced. Despite this setback, I re-evaluated the project plan and identified key areas where we could cut costs without compromising quality.

I negotiated better terms with suppliers, optimized team schedules to reduce overtime, and leveraged existing resources more effectively. We also adopted lean methodologies to streamline processes and eliminate waste.

Despite financial constraints, the project was completed successfully within the revised budget. This experience taught me that resourcefulness and strategic planning can overcome limitations in resources.”

4. Could you describe your experience with managing a diverse team of researchers and developers?

The essence of this question is to evaluate your leadership skills and your ability to manage diversity. A director of research and development often oversees a team of individuals with diverse backgrounds, skills, and perspectives. You’ll need to demonstrate that you can effectively manage, motivate, and mentor a varied team while fostering an inclusive and collaborative environment. The goal is to ensure that diverse thoughts and ideas are leveraged to drive innovation and development in the company.

Example: “In my experience, managing a diverse team requires understanding and respect for individual differences. I’ve led teams with varied backgrounds, skills, and perspectives, fostering an inclusive environment where everyone feels valued.

I encouraged open communication to leverage these differences positively, leading to innovative solutions. This approach not only improved our research outcomes but also facilitated personal growth among team members.

Balancing the needs of researchers and developers was crucial. By setting clear expectations and providing necessary resources, I ensured both could thrive in their roles. Regular feedback sessions helped align everyone towards common goals, enhancing productivity and morale.

Overall, my management style is adaptive, focusing on individual strengths while promoting unity within diversity.”

5. How would you ensure that our company stays on the cutting edge of technology and innovation in our industry?

A director of research and development is the torchbearer of innovation for a company. It is their responsibility to keep the firm at the forefront of technological advancements and industry trends. Hence, the hiring team wants to assess your strategic vision, your understanding of market trends, and your ability to lead a team to innovate and implement new technologies or processes that will keep the company competitive.

Example: “To ensure our company remains at the forefront of technology and innovation, I would focus on three key areas.

1. Market Research: Regularly monitor industry trends, emerging technologies, and competitor activities to identify opportunities for innovation.

2. Collaboration: Foster a culture of collaboration within the team that encourages sharing ideas and exploring new concepts.

3. Investment: Advocate for investment in advanced tools, training, and resources necessary for research and development.

By focusing on these areas, we can drive technological advancement and maintain an innovative edge in our industry.”

6. Could you discuss a time when a project failed and how you handled it?

The pathway to innovation is often filled with trials, errors, and yes, even failures. Hiring managers want to see that you can not only cope with failure, but also learn from it, apply its lessons, and use it as a stepping stone to future success. This isn’t just about resilience, it’s also about your analytical abilities and your capacity to turn negatives into positives in a high-stakes, high-pressure role.

Example: “In one instance, a product we developed didn’t meet market expectations despite positive early testing. We quickly gathered feedback and realized the issue was with user interface.

We immediately assembled a team to address this. By focusing on customer feedback, we were able to redesign the interface in a way that significantly improved user experience. This taught me the importance of agility and adaptability in R&D.”

7. How have you fostered a culture of creativity and innovation in your past roles?

In the field of research and development, creativity and innovation are the driving forces that push the boundaries of what’s possible. As a Director, you’re tasked not only with coming up with innovative ideas yourself, but also with creating an environment where your team feels encouraged to think outside the box. By asking this question, hiring managers want to gauge your leadership style and your ability to cultivate a culture that values and promotes innovation.

Example: “In fostering a culture of creativity and innovation, I’ve always encouraged open communication. This allows team members to freely share ideas without fear of judgment or criticism.

I also believe in the power of cross-functional collaboration. By bringing together diverse perspectives, we can spark innovative solutions that may not have been considered within a single department.

Moreover, I regularly invest in professional development opportunities for my team. This ensures they are up-to-date with the latest industry trends and technologies, which can inspire fresh thinking and new approaches.

Lastly, recognizing and rewarding creative efforts is vital. Celebrating successes, big or small, motivates the team to continue pushing boundaries and striving for excellence.”

8. How do you manage the risks associated with research and development projects?

This question is designed to assess your ability to balance innovation with safety and practicality. In a field like research and development, there is always a certain degree of risk involved, whether it’s financial, operational, or reputational. As a director, it’s your responsibility to mitigate these risks while still pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. Thus, potential employers want to see that you can handle this delicate balance effectively.

Example: “Managing risks in R&D projects involves a multi-faceted approach. A key strategy is to conduct thorough preliminary research and feasibility studies before embarking on any project. This helps identify potential challenges or roadblocks that may arise.

Another crucial tactic is to implement robust project management practices, including regular progress tracking and risk assessments. By doing so, we can promptly identify and mitigate any emerging risks.

Additionally, fostering a culture of open communication within the team allows for early detection and resolution of issues. It also encourages innovative problem-solving strategies.

Lastly, diversifying our portfolio of projects can help spread the risk. If one project encounters difficulties, others could still succeed, ensuring overall progress and success.”

9. Can you describe a time when you had to make a difficult decision that affected the direction of a research project?

Steering the ship of research and development involves making tough calls that can fundamentally alter the direction of a project. Employers want to know that you have the courage, wisdom, and strategic thinking required to make these decisions, even when they’re difficult or unpopular. Your response will give them a sense of your leadership style, your ability to evaluate risks and benefits, and your commitment to the project’s ultimate success.

Example: “In a previous project, we were exploring the potential of a new material for energy storage. However, midway through, our results were not as promising as expected.

I had to make the tough decision to pivot our focus towards improving existing technology instead. This was difficult because it meant abandoning months of work and starting over.

Despite the setback, this choice ultimately led us to develop an enhancement that significantly increased efficiency in current systems. It reinforced the importance of flexibility and strategic decision-making in research.”

10. How do you prioritize multiple projects with competing deadlines?

Being at the helm of research and development, you’ll be juggling multiple balls at any given time. Prioritization is key to ensure that resources are allocated correctly, deadlines are met, and the team is focused on the right areas. This question is designed to give the interviewer an insight into your strategic thinking, planning skills, and your ability to make tough decisions under pressure.

Example: “Prioritizing multiple projects with competing deadlines requires a strategic approach. I first evaluate each project based on its urgency, importance to the business objectives, and the resources required.

Once this evaluation is complete, I use project management tools to visually map out timelines and dependencies. This helps in identifying potential bottlenecks or overlapping tasks that can be streamlined.

Communication is also key. Regular updates to all stakeholders ensure everyone understands their roles and responsibilities, as well as any changes to the plan.

In cases where resources are stretched thin, I’m not afraid to advocate for additional support or negotiate extensions if it ensures quality output.”

11. What steps would you take to ensure a smooth transition from research and development to product launch?

This question is designed to gauge your understanding of the product development lifecycle, from ideation to market launch. As a Director of Research and Development, it’s expected that you not only have expertise in creating innovative products, but also have the skills to coordinate with other departments (like manufacturing, marketing, and sales) to ensure the product is successfully launched in the market. This requires strategic planning, effective communication, and strong organizational skills, which are all key qualities that an employer would be looking for.

Example: “To ensure a smooth transition from R&D to product launch, it’s crucial to establish clear communication channels among all departments involved. This ensures everyone is aligned on the project timeline and deliverables.

A robust testing phase is also essential to identify any potential issues before the product goes to market. It’s important for us to gather feedback during this stage and make necessary adjustments.

Furthermore, I would work closely with the marketing team to develop an effective go-to-market strategy. This includes understanding our target audience, competitive landscape, and unique selling propositions.

Finally, contingency planning is vital. We need to anticipate possible challenges that may arise during the launch and have strategies in place to address them.”

12. Can you discuss a time when you had to convince stakeholders to invest in a risky research project?

Being in charge of research and development often involves taking calculated risks. Stakeholders, however, may be wary of investing in projects that don’t guarantee a certain outcome. Therefore, they are interested in learning how you handle such situations. Can you convince others to see the value in your ideas? This question allows you to demonstrate your ability to influence, persuade, and communicate effectively—skills that are key for a successful Director of Research and Development.

Example: “In one instance, I proposed a project involving AI technology to predict market trends. It was risky due to the substantial investment required and the unpredictable nature of AI outcomes.

I started by conducting thorough research on the potential benefits and ROI. I then communicated these findings to stakeholders in a language they understood, focusing on financial gains and competitive advantage.

To address their concerns about risk, I presented a detailed risk mitigation plan. This included phased implementation, constant monitoring, and contingency plans.

Their initial skepticism turned into approval as they realized the potential for significant long-term rewards. The project eventually became a major success, validating our calculated risks.”

13. How have you handled disagreements or conflicts within your team in the past?

Conflict resolution is a critical skill for any leadership role, but particularly in a field like research and development, where ideas and approaches can vary widely. The way you handle conflicts within your team can significantly impact the team dynamic, productivity, and the overall success of projects. Hence, an interviewer will ask this question to gauge your leadership style, problem-solving skills, and ability to maintain a positive work environment even during disagreements.

Example: “In dealing with team conflicts, I focus on open communication and active listening. For instance, when a disagreement arose over project priorities, I facilitated a meeting where each member could express their viewpoint.

I encouraged everyone to approach the issue objectively, focusing on the project’s success rather than personal preferences. After understanding all perspectives, we collectively developed a solution that balanced individual concerns with our overall goals.

This approach not only resolved the conflict but also fostered mutual respect among team members, improving our collaboration in future projects.”

14. How would you stay updated with advancements in technology relevant to our industry?

Keeping up with the latest technology trends is vital in a field like research and development, where staying ahead of the competition often means being the first to utilize new methodologies or tools. By asking this question, hiring managers are looking to see whether you have a plan to stay informed about technological advancements and how proactive you are about incorporating them into your work.

Example: “Staying updated with technology advancements is crucial in a fast-paced field like R&D. I regularly read industry-specific publications and research journals to keep myself informed about the latest trends and discoveries.

Attending conferences, webinars, and workshops also provides opportunities for learning from experts and networking with peers.

Moreover, I believe in fostering a culture of continuous learning within my team. Encouraging them to share their knowledge and insights can lead to collective growth and innovation.

Lastly, partnering with academic institutions or tech companies for collaborative projects can provide firsthand experience with emerging technologies.”

15. Can you share your experience with setting and managing a research and development budget?

The essence of this question lies in understanding your financial acumen and strategic planning skills. As a director of research and development, you’ll be expected to handle budgets, allocate funds effectively, and make strategic decisions that can have a significant impact on the company’s financial health and progress. By asking this question, interviewers want to gauge your ability to manage resources wisely and your experience with financial planning in a research and development context.

Example: “Managing a research and development budget requires strategic planning, careful monitoring, and flexibility. I have experience in setting up R&D budgets by aligning them with the company’s goals and expected outcomes of each project.

I’ve found it crucial to allocate resources for unexpected costs or opportunities that may arise during the process. This involves regular review and adjustments as needed.

My approach also includes engaging team members in the budgeting process. Their insights are invaluable in understanding the practical aspects of resource allocation.

In managing the budget, I use data-driven methods to track spending and ensure cost-effectiveness without compromising innovation.”

16. How have you incorporated customer feedback into the research and development process in the past?

This question is posed to measure your ability to merge two key areas. It is important to ensure that the research and development team is not operating in a bubble, but rather, is actively incorporating feedback from end-users. This demonstrates the ability to create products or services that are not just innovative, but also resonate with the target market and meet their actual needs.

Example: “Incorporating customer feedback in R&D is crucial for product relevancy and market fit. In a recent project, we used surveys and interviews to gather user insights about our prototype. This data was then analyzed and translated into actionable steps for the development team.

We also implemented an iterative process where prototypes were adjusted based on feedback and retested. This ensured that the final product met customer needs and expectations.

Furthermore, we maintained open communication channels with key customers throughout the development process. Their ongoing input allowed us to make real-time adjustments and improve the product continuously.”

17. How would you handle a situation where a project is not progressing as planned?

The essence of R&D is navigating through the unknown, and that often means projects might not go according to plan. As a potential Director of Research and Development, you’re expected to demonstrate strategic thinking, problem-solving skills, and a level-headed approach to crisis management. This question helps recruiters assess your ability to handle setbacks, make necessary adjustments, and lead your team towards achieving project goals despite unforeseen challenges.

Example: “In such a situation, I would first conduct an in-depth analysis to identify the root cause of the delay. This could involve reviewing project tasks, deadlines and resources involved.

After identifying the issues, I would communicate with my team about the challenges we’re facing and brainstorm possible solutions. It’s crucial for everyone to be on the same page and work towards resolving the issue collectively.

Then, I’d revise our project plan based on the agreed-upon solutions, which might involve reallocating resources or adjusting timelines.

Throughout this process, it’s important to maintain open communication with stakeholders, updating them regularly about progress and changes. Transparency helps manage expectations and fosters trust.”

18. Can you describe a time when you had to defend your team’s research findings to skeptics?

The essence of research and development is innovation and discovery, and with that comes the potential for skepticism and resistance. As a leader in R&D, you will need to stand by your team’s findings and be able to communicate them effectively to diverse audiences, some of whom may be doubtful or critical. This question is designed to test your ability to advocate for your team, and to articulate complex ideas convincingly and confidently.

Example: “In one project, our team’s research suggested a novel approach to product development. However, the management was skeptical due to its unconventional nature.

I arranged a meeting where I presented our data and explained the methodology behind our findings. I emphasized on how this approach could lead to significant cost savings and efficiency in the long run.

Despite initial resistance, my clear presentation of facts and potential benefits convinced them to give our idea a trial run. The successful outcome reinforced the value of thorough research and open-mindedness towards innovative solutions.”

19. How do you measure the success of a research and development project?

As a director, it’s critical that you’re able to establish and monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) that align with the company’s goals. Understanding how you measure the success of a project can give hiring managers insight into your strategic thinking, your ability to deliver results, and how you define success in terms of innovation and development.

Example: “Measuring the success of a research and development project requires both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Key performance indicators such as return on investment, time to market, and patent filings can provide tangible measures of success.

However, it’s also crucial to consider less tangible aspects like increased knowledge or expertise within the team, improved processes, or enhanced customer satisfaction. A successful R&D project should not only deliver a viable product but also contribute to the overall growth and improvement of the organization.”

20. How have you ensured quality control in your previous research and development roles?

Quality control is a pivotal part of any research and development role. It is the process that ensures the end product is reliable, safe, and effective. It’s an area that requires meticulous attention to detail and a systematic approach. Hiring managers want to know that you understand the importance of this process, and have the skills and experience to implement and manage it effectively.

Example: “In my experience, ensuring quality control in R&D involves a multi-faceted approach. One key aspect is implementing rigorous testing protocols for each development phase. This allows us to identify and rectify issues early on.

Another crucial element is fostering open communication within the team. Encouraging feedback helps pinpoint potential problems before they escalate.

Lastly, I have found that using project management tools effectively can greatly enhance quality control. These tools provide real-time visibility into the progress of projects, enabling swift action when necessary.

Overall, it’s about creating an environment where quality is everyone’s responsibility.”

21. Can you discuss a time when you had to pivot a project due to unforeseen challenges or obstacles?

As the captain of the innovation ship, a Director of Research and Development must be agile and adaptable. There will be times when projects don’t go as planned due to unexpected challenges. Your ability to pivot and steer the project in a new direction while maintaining team morale and meeting business objectives is a critical skill. This question seeks to understand your problem-solving skills, adaptability, and leadership style when facing such hurdles.

Example: “In one of my previous projects, we were developing a new software tool. Midway through, we discovered that the technology stack we had chosen was not robust enough to support our goals.

Recognizing this challenge early on, I coordinated with the team to pivot towards a more scalable and reliable technology stack. This required re-planning and adjusting timelines but ultimately led to a successful project completion.

This experience reinforced the importance of flexibility and adaptability in research and development.”

22. How do you encourage collaboration and communication within your team?

Asking this question helps employers understand your leadership style and how you foster a cooperative atmosphere. In research and development roles, collaboration and effective communication are key to innovation and problem-solving. Your answer will provide insight into your ability to build a cohesive team that can work together to achieve common goals.

Example: “Encouraging collaboration and communication within a team starts with setting clear expectations. I believe in the power of open dialogue, so I promote regular meetings where everyone can share their insights and updates.

To foster collaboration, I encourage cross-functional projects that require different skills and perspectives. This not only improves teamwork but also leads to innovative solutions.

For effective communication, I advocate for transparency and honesty. It’s crucial for everyone to feel comfortable expressing their ideas or concerns without fear of judgment.

Finally, recognizing individual contributions while celebrating collective success is key. This approach ensures each member feels valued and part of the bigger picture.”

23. Can you share your experience with patent filing and intellectual property rights?

The lifeblood of any R&D department is the new ideas it generates and brings to fruition. The protection of those ideas through patents and intellectual property rights is critical to ensure the company’s investment in R&D pays off. So, hiring managers want to ensure that you have the experience and knowledge to navigate the complexities of patent filing and intellectual property rights to protect the company’s interests.

Example: “I have extensive experience with patent filing and intellectual property rights. I’ve overseen the process of identifying inventions within my team, documenting them properly, and working with legal experts to file for patents.

Understanding the importance of protecting our innovations has been crucial in maintaining competitive advantage. This includes ensuring that all members of my team are aware of the significance of IP rights and their role in safeguarding them.

In terms of challenges, navigating through different international patent laws can be complex. However, by collaborating closely with experienced attorneys, we’ve managed to secure patents globally.

This knowledge and experience will enable me to lead your R&D department effectively, ensuring all innovative ideas are protected.”

24. How would you handle a situation where a team member is not meeting their project goals?

Leadership and management skills are paramount for a Director of Research and Development. Teams under this role are often tasked with complex, high-stakes projects, and ensuring that everyone is contributing effectively is critical. The question aims to assess your ability to address underperformance, foster accountability, and maintain a productive team dynamic.

Example: “In such a scenario, I would first try to understand the reasons behind their underperformance. It could be due to lack of clarity, personal issues or skills gap.

I’d then have a one-on-one discussion with them, providing constructive feedback while also listening to their concerns. If it’s an issue of understanding, I’d ensure they have all necessary information and resources.

If it’s a skill gap, we can explore training options. However, if the problem persists despite these measures, I might need to reassess their role within the team or project. Open communication and support are key in resolving such issues.”

25. What strategies have you used in the past to retain top talent in your team?

Maintaining a high-caliber team is pivotal to success in a role such as Director of Research and Development. As such, hiring managers are keen to understand your people management skills, specifically your ability to recognize, reward, and retain top performers. Your answer to this question could give them insights into your leadership style and your understanding of the importance of employee satisfaction in driving productivity and innovation.

Example: “In my experience, retaining top talent involves a mix of recognition, growth opportunities, and fostering an inclusive environment.

I’ve found that acknowledging the hard work and achievements of team members is crucial. This not only boosts morale but also encourages them to maintain their performance level.

Providing clear career progression paths and continuous learning opportunities is another effective strategy. By investing in their professional development, we show our commitment to their future within the organization.

Lastly, cultivating an open and inclusive culture where everyone feels valued and heard promotes job satisfaction. I believe these strategies have been key in maintaining high retention rates among top performers.”

26. Can you discuss a time when you implemented a new technology or method that significantly improved a project?

The essence of a Director of Research and Development’s role is to revolutionize and streamline processes through innovation. Therefore, a potential employer is keen to understand your past experiences with introducing new technologies or methods and the impact they had on a project. It provides insights into your problem-solving skills, innovation, leadership, and your ability to drive change within an organization.

Example: “In one of my previous projects, we were struggling with data management and analysis due to the volume of information. I suggested implementing a cloud-based Big Data solution.

After researching various options, we decided on Apache Hadoop for its scalability and flexibility. The transition required training our team and altering some of our processes, but it was well worth it.

The new system significantly improved our efficiency in handling large datasets. It also enhanced our predictive analytics capabilities, leading to more informed decision-making. This change had a profound impact on the project’s success.”

27. How do you ensure that your team stays motivated and engaged during long-term projects?

The essence of a director of research and development role is to oversee long-term, complex projects. These projects can sometimes stretch for years and maintaining team morale during these periods is critical. By asking this question, hiring managers are trying to assess your leadership skills, your ability to keep your team motivated, and your strategies for maintaining productivity and engagement over the long haul. They want to ensure that you can effectively manage your team to deliver results, even when the finish line seems far away.

Example: “Motivation and engagement in long-term projects can be maintained through clear communication, recognition of achievements, and fostering a positive team culture.

I believe in setting clear objectives from the beginning and ensuring that each team member understands their role and contribution to the project’s success. Regular updates on progress and challenges keep everyone informed and involved.

Recognizing individual and team accomplishments boosts morale and encourages continued effort. This could range from acknowledging someone’s innovative solution to celebrating milestones reached as a team.

Creating a supportive environment where ideas are valued and collaboration is encouraged also fosters engagement. Team building activities or brainstorming sessions can help build rapport and maintain enthusiasm throughout the project duration.”

28. Can you provide an example of a time when you had to balance short-term results with long-term goals in a research project?

This question serves to unearth your strategic thinking and decision-making skills. As a Director of Research and Development, you will often be in situations where immediate results are demanded, but you must also keep your sights on the company’s long-term vision and objectives. Your ability to navigate such situations successfully can provide a clear picture of how you’d contribute to the organization’s future growth.

Example: “In one of my previous projects, we were developing a new product. The short-term goal was to quickly release a prototype for market testing. However, the long-term objective was to ensure that the final product was innovative and superior in quality.

To balance both, I prioritized tasks essential for the prototype development without compromising on the research required for long-term innovation. We released the prototype as planned while continuing our work on enhancing the product features. This approach helped us gather immediate customer feedback and also ensured that we stayed on track with our long-term goals.”

29. How would you handle a situation where a research project is not yielding the expected results?

Because research and development is all about the unknown. As the Director, you’ll need to show that you can handle uncertainty and unexpected outcomes with poise, creativity, and strategic thinking. This question helps the interviewer assess your problem-solving skills, adaptability, and ability to make tough decisions when a project is not going as planned.

Example: “When a research project doesn’t yield expected results, it’s crucial to reassess the methodology and hypotheses. I would initiate a thorough review of our approach, data collection methods, and analysis techniques.

If needed, we might need to pivot or redefine our objectives based on new findings. It is also essential to communicate these changes transparently with all stakeholders involved.

Remember, unexpected results can lead to groundbreaking discoveries. Therefore, maintaining an open mindset towards such situations is key in research and development.”

30. Can you discuss a time when you had to manage a project that involved collaboration with external partners or organizations?

In today’s increasingly interconnected business landscape, the ability to collaborate effectively with external partners is a critical skill. The interviewer wants to gauge your experience and proficiency in managing such partnerships, and your ability to navigate any potential challenges that might arise. This includes communication, project management, negotiation, and problem-solving skills—all essential for the successful execution of collaborative projects.

Example: “In one of my previous projects, we collaborated with a leading technology firm to develop an innovative software solution. My role was to manage the project and ensure seamless integration between both teams.

This involved setting clear objectives, establishing communication protocols, and fostering mutual respect for each other’s expertise. We faced challenges such as time zone differences and cultural nuances, but through proactive planning and open dialogue, we overcame these obstacles successfully.

The result was a high-performing product that exceeded our expectations and strengthened our partnership with the external organization. This experience reinforced the importance of effective collaboration in achieving shared goals.”

30 Tanker Driver Interview Questions and Answers

30 managing editor interview questions and answers, you may also be interested in..., 30 radiology technologist interview questions and answers, 30 marketing and public relations manager interview questions and answers, 30 event coordinator assistant interview questions and answers, 30 recruitment associate interview questions and answers.

Biomedical Research Awareness Day (BRAD) 2024

Bradley ferguson encourages you to stop by the info table and come to a lunch-and-learn session april 18 to celebrate #bradglobal.

Biomedical Research Awareness Day (BRAD) is an opportunity to raise public awareness regarding the roles of animals in biomedical research and the resulting medical advancements that benefit humans and animals.

It is important to know that researchers cannot simply perform animal experiments without oversight. This is where the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) comes into play. The IACUC is responsible for the oversight of animal care and use, and at the University of Nevada, Reno, this includes all live vertebrate animals used in research and teaching campus wide.

The IACUC consists of at least five members that includes one veterinarian with training in laboratory animal science and medicine, one practicing scientist with animal research experience, one non-scientist member, and one member not affiliated with the institution other than serving on the IACUC. At the University, we go beyond the minimum to include more than one non-affiliated, non-scientific community members, animal research scientists across colleges and departments, and two trained veterinarians.

The IACUC reviews all proposals that will use live vertebrate animals at the University before the activity is started, reviews any requested changes to these protocols, and ensures that these protocols maintain humane care and use of animals. The IACUC also investigates any reported concerns or complaints regarding the use of animals.

The University is fully accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC), strengthening our commitment to excellence in research integrity and lab animal welfare.

During Biomedical Research and Awareness Day – a worldwide #BRADglobal initiative – you can learn more about the IACUC and the use of animals in biomedical research. Stop by our interactive booth in the Breezeway of the Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center on Thursday, April 18, anytime between 10:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m. At 1 p.m. in the Rotunda, join presenter Matthew Lewon , assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and principal investigator for the University’s Animal Behavior Laboratory, for a lunch-and-learn discussion where you will explore careers available in biomedical research.

We hope you can participate in #BRAD2024 and find time to help us honor, raise awareness of and pledge support for the animals needed to find treatments and cures for both humans and animals.

Learn more about BRAD , an event created by Americans for Medical Progress.

About the author

Bradley Ferguson is an associate professor and graduate program director in the Department of Nutrition. He is currently serving as chair for the University of Nevada, Reno’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. In his lab, Brad works with his team to create an exciting and productive environment geared to translate basic discoveries into potential therapies for cardio-metabolic disease. His lab uses an integrative, translational research approach that encompasses bioinformatics, in vitro cell culture, and in vivo animal models.

By: Bradley Ferguson

Presenting Virtual Reality in Japan

Michael Wilson, specialist, Virtual Reality Programming & Development for University Libraries, discusses his experience demonstrating VR work from the @One while visiting Japan

History of Student Life on Campus

Sesquicentennial Archivist Rebecca Sparagowski dives into the history of student life on campus in a new exhibit from University Libraries

Neurodiversity Celebration Week with University Libraries

Engineering & Fabrication Librarian Rebecca Glasgow, member of the University Libraries Inclusion Diversity Equity and Accessibility Committee, shares information about tools available in lendable technology

GSA Unity in Diversity

Members of the University's Graduate Student Association discuss the upcoming Unity in Diversity celebration and take a look at years past

Editor's Picks

Anthropology doctoral candidate places second in regional Three-Minute Thesis Competition

A look at careers of substance and impact

NASA astronaut Eileen Collins shares stories at Women in Space event

University of Nevada, Reno and Arizona State University awarded grant to study future of biosecurity

Nevada Today

Giving Day: The Wolf Pack Way

Help raise vital funds campuswide by donating to the area that matters most to you on Thursday, April 11

Students versus staff in the fight against food waste

A Pack Place battle for sustainability with WasteNot 2.0

FAA grants civil UAS operations waiver for University operated Nevada Autonomous Test Site

1,000 square-mile test site area in Northern Nevada, first in a series of sites planned for drone research, development, testing

Kendra Isable represented the University at the Western Association of Graduate Schools annual conference

Grads of the Pack: Tommy Kaps

Engineering’s CREATE program sets student up for success in wastewater research

University of Nevada, Reno Multicultural Center organizes events in April, ahead of Asian Pacific Islander Heritage Month in May

These events celebrate and honor culture and community

Senators Rosen, Cortez Masto worked with University President Brian Sandoval to secure more than $4 million for research programs at the University of Nevada, Reno

The funding will support research initiatives across the state

Sagebrushers season 3 ep. 1: College of Business Dean Gregory Mosier

College of Business prepares for the future of business education, enhanced business partnerships and the new building on the south end of campus