leadership essay on martin luther king

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Leadership and Martin Luther King’s Dream

• Rosabeth Moss Kanter

“I have a dream” by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is one of the most famous speeches of recent history. Aspiring leaders study it to see how memorable words that sketch a big, compelling vision can inspire significant change. But four words are not the measure of the man. There is much more to […]

“ I have a dream ” by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., is one of the most famous speeches of recent history. Aspiring leaders study it to see how memorable words that sketch a big, compelling vision can inspire significant change.

• Rosabeth Moss Kanter is the Ernest L. Arbuckle Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, the founding chair of the Harvard Advanced Leadership Initiative, and a former chief editor of Harvard Business Review. She is the author of Think Outside the Building: How Advanced Leaders Can Change the World One Smart Innovation at a Time (Public Affairs, 2020). RosabethKanter

Partner Center

Untitled Leader

The King’s Legacy: Timeless Leadership Lessons from Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Journey Begins: King’s Timeless Leadership

Leadership is an essential aspect of human history, shaping the course of nations, societies, and organizations. As we strive to become better leaders in our personal and professional lives, it is important to study the lives and legacies of influential figures who have left an indelible mark on the world. One such individual is Martin Luther King, Jr., a man who embodied the spirit of servant leadership and inspired millions through his passionate advocacy for racial equality and social justice. In this article, we will delve into the leadership lessons and stories from King’s life, analyzing the qualities and strategies that made him an exceptional leader.

Born on January 15, 1929, in Atlanta, Georgia, Martin Luther King, Jr. grew up in a time of deeply entrenched racial segregation in the United States. The son of a Baptist minister, King was raised in a religious household where he was instilled with a strong sense of morality, equality, and the importance of helping others. As he grew older, King’s education and encounters with influential thinkers, such as Mahatma Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau , further solidified his commitment to nonviolent resistance as a means of effecting social change. This commitment would eventually lead him to become a central figure in the American civil rights movement and a global icon for peace and equality.

King’s involvement in the civil rights movement began in earnest during the mid-1950s and spanned until his untimely death in 1968. Throughout his career, he demonstrated exceptional leadership qualities such as vision, courage, empathy, and an unwavering commitment to nonviolence. His ability to unite people from different backgrounds and inspire them to work together for a common cause was a testament to his skill as a leader.

In this article, we will explore the key events, decisions, and challenges in Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life that shaped his leadership philosophy and practice. By examining his early influences, involvement in pivotal civil rights campaigns, and his later years as an advocate for economic justice and global peace, we will uncover the timeless leadership lessons that made King an exceptional figure in history. Furthermore, we will discuss the enduring relevance of his teachings in today’s rapidly changing world and provide insights for future leaders who seek to make a difference in their own spheres of influence.

As we embark on this journey through Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life, it is important to remember that, while he was an extraordinary individual, he was not without his flaws and struggles. By examining both his successes and his challenges, we can glean valuable lessons about the complexities of leadership and the importance of personal growth and self-reflection. Ultimately, our goal is to illuminate the qualities and strategies that made King a transformative leader so that we may learn from his example and apply these lessons in our own lives.

Early Influences on King’s Leadership

A key aspect of understanding Martin Luther King, Jr.’s leadership is examining the early influences that shaped his values and beliefs. By exploring his family background, education, and the role of faith in his life, we can gain a deeper understanding of the foundational elements that informed his leadership style and philosophy.

Family Background and its Impact on Values

King was born into a family deeply rooted in the African American church and community. Both his father and grandfather were Baptist ministers, and their influence played a significant role in shaping his worldview. King’s parents, Martin Luther King, Sr. and Alberta Williams King, were strong advocates for racial equality and social justice, and they instilled these values in their son from an early age. Growing up in a racially segregated society, King witnessed firsthand the injustices and indignities faced by African Americans, which further fueled his commitment to fighting for equality.

King’s parents also taught him the importance of education, hard work, and self-discipline. They encouraged him to pursue academic excellence and to develop his skills as a public speaker. This early focus on education and personal development laid the foundation for King’s intellectual curiosity, critical thinking abilities, and persuasive communication skills – all of which would prove invaluable in his later work as a civil rights leader.

Education and Exposure to Influential Thinkers

King’s pursuit of higher education led him to attend Morehouse College, where he studied sociology and earned his bachelor’s degree in 1948. He then went on to study theology at Crozer Theological Seminary, where he earned a Bachelor of Divinity degree in 1951. Finally, King completed his Ph.D. in systematic theology at Boston University in 1955. Throughout his academic journey, King was exposed to a wide range of influential thinkers and philosophical ideas that would significantly influence his leadership style and beliefs.

During his time at Morehouse College, King was introduced to the writings of Henry David Thoreau, whose essay “Civil Disobedience” greatly impacted his thinking on nonviolent resistance. At Crozer Theological Seminary, King studied the works of philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, and Immanuel Kant, as well as theologians like Friedrich Schleiermacher and Reinhold Niebuhr. These thinkers helped King develop a more nuanced understanding of human nature, morality, and the role of religion in social change.

Perhaps one of the most significant influences on King’s leadership philosophy was his exposure to the life and teachings of Mahatma Gandhi during his doctoral studies at Boston University. Gandhi’s success in using nonviolent civil disobedience to secure India’s independence from British rule deeply resonated with King, who saw the potential for a similar approach to be applied in the struggle for civil rights in the United States. The principles of nonviolence, love, and passive resistance would become central tenets of King’s leadership style and the broader civil rights movement.

The Role of Faith in Shaping His Leadership Style

King’s Christian faith was a fundamental aspect of his identity and played a crucial role in shaping his leadership style. As a Baptist minister, King viewed his work in the civil rights movement as a divine calling and a fulfillment of his spiritual duty to promote justice and equality. He often drew upon biblical teachings and stories to inspire his followers and to provide a moral framework for their struggle.

King’s faith also played a crucial role in his commitment to nonviolence. He believed that love and forgiveness were more powerful than hatred and that nonviolent resistance was the most effective way to combat the forces of oppression. This belief in the transformative power of love and the inherent dignity of all human beings underpinned his approach to leadership and his vision for a more just and equitable society.

In summary, the early influences on Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life – his family background, education, and faith – were instrumental in shaping his values, beliefs, and leadership style. His upbringing in a religious household, coupled with his exposure to influential thinkers and ideas, helped King develop a deep sense of moral responsibility and a commitment to social justice. His faith in the power of nonviolent resistance and the transformative potential of love and forgiveness would go on to define his approach to leadership and inspire millions to join him in the struggle for civil rights and equality.

By understanding the formative experiences that shaped King’s worldview and leadership philosophy, we can gain valuable insights into the qualities and strategies that made him an exceptional leader. His early influences serve as a reminder of the importance of nurturing our intellectual curiosity, honing our communication skills, and grounding our leadership in a strong ethical foundation. As we delve further into King’s life and work, we will continue to explore the leadership lessons and stories that can inspire and guide us in our own personal and professional endeavors.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955-1956)

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a pivotal event in the civil rights movement and marked the beginning of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s ascent as a national leader. This campaign not only demonstrated the power of grassroots organization and nonviolent resistance but also showcased King’s ability to lead with courage, perseverance, and resilience. In this section, we will explore the key aspects of the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the leadership lessons that can be gleaned from King’s involvement in this historic event.

Overview of the Event and King’s Involvement

The Montgomery Bus Boycott began on December 5, 1955, after Rosa Parks, an African American woman, was arrested for refusing to give up her seat to a white passenger on a segregated city bus. This act of defiance ignited a year-long boycott of Montgomery’s public transportation system, led by King and the newly formed Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA). The boycott aimed to end racial segregation on the city’s buses and challenge the broader system of racial discrimination in the United States.

As president of the MIA, King was responsible for organizing and coordinating the boycott efforts, which included arranging alternative transportation for African American residents, raising funds to support the campaign, and engaging in legal battles against segregation laws. Throughout the boycott, King used his oratory skills and charisma to galvanize the African American community and to advocate for nonviolent resistance as the most effective means of achieving their goals.

Strategic Planning and the Importance of Grassroots Organization

One of the key factors contributing to the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott was the strategic planning and grassroots organization that underpinned the campaign. King and the MIA recognized the importance of building a strong, unified movement that could sustain the boycott for an extended period. They mobilized local churches, civic organizations, and individual volunteers to support the boycott and to spread the message of nonviolent resistance.

King’s leadership during this period highlights the importance of fostering collaboration, delegating responsibilities, and empowering others to take ownership of the movement. By building a diverse and inclusive coalition, King was able to harness the collective strength of the African American community and to ensure the boycott’s longevity and ultimate success.

Lessons on Courage, Perseverance, and Resilience

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was not without its challenges. Throughout the campaign, King and other boycott leaders faced threats, harassment, and even acts of violence from those who opposed their efforts. King’s home was bombed, and he was arrested and jailed on trumped-up charges. Despite these obstacles, King remained steadfast in his commitment to nonviolence and continued to lead the boycott with unwavering determination.

The courage, perseverance, and resilience displayed by King during the Montgomery Bus Boycott serve as powerful reminders of the qualities that are essential for effective leadership, especially in the face of adversity. King’s ability to remain focused on the larger goal of racial equality, even in the midst of personal danger and hardship, demonstrates the importance of maintaining a clear vision and staying true to one’s principles.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a transformative event in the civil rights movement and a defining moment in Martin Luther King, Jr.’s leadership journey. The lessons gleaned from this historic campaign – the importance of strategic planning, grassroots organization, and resilience in the face of adversity – remain relevant for leaders today. By studying King’s involvement in the Montgomery Bus Boycott, we can gain valuable insights into the qualities and strategies that make for effective and inspirational leadership.

The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)

The formation of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in 1957 marked a significant step in the evolution of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s leadership and the broader civil rights movement. The SCLC played a crucial role in coordinating and supporting local civil rights campaigns across the South, and under King’s guidance, it helped to propel the movement onto the national stage. In this section, we will discuss the objectives of the SCLC, King’s leadership style in building a diverse coalition, and the power of nonviolent direct action.

Formation and Objectives of the SCLC

In the aftermath of the successful Montgomery Bus Boycott, King and other civil rights leaders recognized the need for a more coordinated and organized effort to challenge racial segregation and discrimination throughout the South. To this end, they established the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1957, with King serving as its first president. The SCLC’s primary objectives were to promote nonviolent direct action as a means of achieving racial equality and to harness the moral authority and organizational power of the African American church in support of the civil rights movement.

The SCLC played a pivotal role in several key civil rights campaigns, including the Albany Movement (1961-1962), the Birmingham Campaign (1963), and the Selma to Montgomery Marches (1965). By providing logistical support, training, and leadership to local activists, the SCLC helped to build a strong and unified movement that was capable of challenging the entrenched system of racial oppression in the United States.

King’s Leadership Style in Building a Diverse Coalition

One of the hallmarks of King’s leadership during his tenure as president of the SCLC was his ability to build a diverse and inclusive coalition of supporters. Recognizing the importance of unity in the struggle for civil rights, King sought to bridge divides within the African American community and to forge alliances with sympathetic white individuals and organizations. He worked closely with other prominent civil rights leaders, such as Ralph Abernathy, Ella Baker, and Fred Shuttlesworth, and welcomed the support of religious and secular organizations from across the political and ideological spectrum.

King’s inclusive leadership style allowed the SCLC to harness the collective strength and resources of a broad array of supporters, which in turn helped to amplify the impact of its campaigns and to generate widespread public sympathy for the cause of civil rights. By transcending the boundaries of race, religion, and politics, King demonstrated the power of unity in the pursuit of social justice and the importance of building strong, diverse coalitions in the face of formidable opposition.

The Power of Nonviolent Direct Action

At the core of the SCLC’s philosophy and approach to social change was the principle of nonviolent direct action. Drawing on the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi and the example of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, King and the SCLC sought to challenge racial segregation and discrimination through acts of civil disobedience, such as sit-ins, marches, and boycotts. By confronting the forces of oppression in a nonviolent manner, they aimed to expose the moral bankruptcy of segregation and to galvanize public opinion in support of racial equality.

The power of nonviolent direct action was evident in the success of the SCLC’s campaigns, which led to the desegregation of public facilities, the passage of landmark civil rights legislation, and a broader shift in societal attitudes towards racial equality. King’s unwavering commitment to nonviolence and his ability to inspire others to follow this path not only contributed to the effectiveness of the civil rights movement but also served as a powerful testament to the transformative potential of love and forgiveness in the pursuit of justice.

In summary, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference was a critical force in advancing the civil rights movement and played a vital role in the successful outcomes of numerous campaigns. Under the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr., the SCLC promoted nonviolent direct action as a means of challenging racial segregation and discrimination and built a diverse coalition of supporters that transcended racial, religious, and political boundaries.

The lessons that can be drawn from King’s leadership during his time with the SCLC are numerous and timeless. By fostering unity and inclusiveness, King demonstrated the power of collective action in effecting meaningful social change. His unwavering commitment to nonviolence and his belief in the transformative potential of love and forgiveness serve as enduring examples of the qualities that can make for effective and inspiring leadership.

As we continue to explore the life and legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr., we should keep these lessons in mind and strive to apply them in our own personal and professional endeavors. By embracing the principles of unity, inclusivity, and nonviolent resistance, we can work towards building a more just and equitable society that honors the values and ideals for which King so tirelessly fought.

The Birmingham Campaign (1963)

The Birmingham Campaign of 1963 was a crucial turning point in the civil rights movement and a testament to the effectiveness of nonviolent direct action. Under the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr., this campaign brought national attention to the struggle for racial equality and laid the groundwork for the passage of landmark civil rights legislation. In this section, we will examine the background and goals of the Birmingham Campaign, discuss King’s “ Letter from Birmingham Jail ,” and explore the moral leadership and power of empathy demonstrated by King during this historic event.

Background and Goals of the Campaign

In 1963, Birmingham, Alabama, was considered one of the most segregated cities in the United States, with a long history of racial violence and discrimination. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), led by King, targeted the city as the site for a major campaign to desegregate public facilities, end discriminatory hiring practices, and promote racial equality. The Birmingham Campaign sought to achieve these goals through nonviolent direct action, including sit-ins, marches, and boycotts.

The campaign began in April 1963 and quickly escalated as local authorities, led by Commissioner of Public Safety Bull Connor, responded with brutal force to the nonviolent protests. The violent confrontations between protesters and police, which included the use of fire hoses and attack dogs against unarmed demonstrators, garnered national and international attention, sparking widespread outrage and sympathy for the civil rights movement.

King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”

On April 12, 1963, King was arrested in Birmingham for participating in a nonviolent protest. While in jail, he wrote his now-famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” a powerful response to a group of white clergymen who had criticized the protests as “unwise and untimely.” In his letter, King eloquently defended the use of nonviolent direct action and called on religious leaders to support the struggle for racial justice.

King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is widely regarded as one of the most significant documents of the civil rights movement, as it underscores the moral and philosophical underpinnings of nonviolent resistance and provides a compelling argument for the necessity of confronting injustice. The letter also highlights King’s exceptional skills as a writer and communicator, which were essential to his ability to inspire and mobilize support for the civil rights cause.

Demonstrating Moral Leadership and the Power of Empathy

Throughout the Birmingham Campaign, King displayed a remarkable degree of moral leadership and empathy, qualities that were critical to the success of the movement. By remaining steadfast in his commitment to nonviolence and calling on others to do the same, King demonstrated the power of love and forgiveness in the face of hatred and brutality. His willingness to put his own life on the line for the cause of justice underscored the depth of his convictions and inspired countless others to join the struggle for racial equality.

King’s empathy was also evident in his ability to understand and articulate the experiences of African Americans living under the oppressive system of segregation. By giving voice to the pain and suffering of those who had been marginalized and dehumanized, King fostered a sense of shared purpose and solidarity within the civil rights movement. This empathy extended beyond the African American community, as King also sought to engage with white Americans and to help them recognize their own stake in the fight for justice and equality.

The Birmingham Campaign was a watershed moment in the civil rights movement and an enduring testament to the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr. The campaign highlighted the power of nonviolent direct action, the importance of moral leadership, and the transformative potential of empathy in the pursuit of social justice. By studying the events and lessons of the Birmingham Campaign, we can gain valuable insights into the qualities and strategies that make for effective and impactful leadership in the face of adversity. As we continue to confront the myriad challenges and opportunities that define our era, the wisdom and vision of Martin Luther King, Jr. remain as relevant and vital today as they were more than half a century ago. By embracing the principles of nonviolence, moral courage, and empathy, leaders across all fields and contexts can help to create a more just, equitable, and compassionate world for all.

The March on Washington and “I Have a Dream” Speech (1963)

The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on August 28, 1963, was a seminal event in the history of the civil rights movement, bringing together a diverse coalition of activists, organizations, and ordinary citizens to demand an end to racial segregation and discrimination. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, delivered at the march, remains one of the most iconic and powerful addresses in American history. In this section, we will discuss the significance of the event and its impact on the civil rights movement, explore the art of storytelling and King’s ability to inspire, and examine the importance of a clear and compelling vision.

Significance of the Event and its Impact on the Civil Rights Movement

The March on Washington was a monumental display of unity and determination in the fight for civil rights, drawing an estimated 250,000 participants to the nation’s capital. The event aimed to pressure the federal government to take decisive action to address racial inequality, including the passage of civil rights legislation and the implementation of policies to combat unemployment and poverty among African Americans.

The march played a critical role in galvanizing public support for the civil rights movement and ultimately contributed to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. By demonstrating the strength and resolve of the movement, the event forced the nation to confront the urgent need for racial justice and set the stage for a new era of civil rights activism.

The Art of Storytelling and King’s Ability to Inspire

One of the most memorable aspects of the March on Washington was Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, in which he articulated a powerful and inspiring vision of a future in which racial harmony and equality would be achieved. King’s speech is a masterclass in the art of storytelling, drawing on biblical imagery, historical references, and vivid metaphors to create an emotional and intellectual connection with his audience.

King’s ability to inspire was rooted in his extraordinary oratorical skills and his deep understanding of the human desire for meaning and purpose. By painting a vivid picture of a world in which all people are judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin, King tapped into the hopes and aspirations of millions of Americans and motivated them to join the struggle for racial justice.

The Importance of a Clear and Compelling Vision

The “I Have a Dream” speech underscores the importance of a clear and compelling vision in effective leadership. King’s vision of a racially just and inclusive society provided a guiding light for the civil rights movement and offered a sense of direction and purpose to those involved in the struggle. By articulating this vision in such a powerful and evocative manner, King was able to rally support for the movement and to inspire a sense of hope and optimism in the face of adversity.

A compelling vision is essential for leaders in any field, as it helps to clarify the ultimate goal and provides a framework for decision-making and action. By establishing a clear vision, leaders can foster a sense of unity and commitment among their followers, enabling them to work together towards a common objective.

The March on Washington and King’s “I Have a Dream” speech serve as enduring examples of the power of visionary leadership and the importance of storytelling in inspiring and mobilizing support for a cause. By understanding the significance of the event and its impact on the civil rights movement, as well as the art of storytelling and the importance of a clear and compelling vision, we can draw valuable lessons that can be applied to our own personal and professional lives.

The Selma to Montgomery Marches (1965)

The Selma to Montgomery Marches in 1965 marked another pivotal moment in the civil rights movement and served as a powerful demonstration of the resilience, determination, and strategic thinking of Martin Luther King, Jr. and his fellow activists. In this section, we will provide an overview of the event and its objectives, discuss the lessons on strategic thinking and adaptability that can be gleaned from the marches, and explore the importance of perseverance in the face of adversity.

Overview of the Event and its Objectives

The Selma to Montgomery Marches were a series of three protest marches organized by the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and other civil rights organizations in response to the systematic suppression of African American voting rights in the South. The marches aimed to draw national attention to the issue and to pressure the federal government to intervene on behalf of disenfranchised African American voters.

The first march, led by King and others, took place on March 7, 1965, and became known as “Bloody Sunday” due to the brutal violence inflicted on the marchers by state troopers and local law enforcement officers. The second march, on March 9, was a symbolic protest in which King led the marchers to the Edmund Pettus Bridge before turning back to avoid further bloodshed. The third and final march, from March 21 to 25, was successful in reaching the state capitol in Montgomery and played a critical role in the passage of the Voting Rights Act later that year.

Lessons on Strategic Thinking and Adaptability

The Selma to Montgomery Marches offer valuable insights into the importance of strategic thinking and adaptability in leadership. King and his fellow organizers recognized the potential of the marches to generate national outrage and support for their cause and carefully planned the events to maximize their impact. When confronted with violence and legal obstacles, they adapted their tactics and persisted in their efforts, ultimately achieving their goals.

The decision to turn back during the second march, for example, demonstrated King’s ability to balance the need for progress with the safety and well-being of the marchers. By choosing to avoid a potentially violent confrontation, King was able to maintain the moral high ground and ensure that the movement’s message remained the focus of public attention.

The Importance of Perseverance in the Face of Adversity

One of the most striking aspects of the Selma to Montgomery Marches is the remarkable perseverance displayed by King and his fellow activists in the face of violent opposition and seemingly insurmountable obstacles. Despite the brutal response to the first march and the legal challenges that threatened to derail their efforts, they refused to be deterred and continued to push forward in their quest for justice.

This determination to persevere in the face of adversity is a hallmark of effective leadership and an essential quality for anyone seeking to make a meaningful impact in the world. By refusing to back down and maintaining their commitment to nonviolence and justice, King and his fellow marchers demonstrated the power of courage, conviction, and unwavering resolve in the pursuit of a better future.

The Selma to Montgomery Marches serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of strategic thinking, adaptability, and perseverance in the face of adversity. The lessons gleaned from these events can be applied not only to the realm of social justice but also to any situation in which individuals or groups are striving to overcome obstacles and effect positive change. By studying the leadership of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the strategies employed during the Selma to Montgomery Marches, we can gain valuable insights into the qualities and tactics that enable success in even the most challenging circumstances.

King’s Later Years and Expanding Vision

In the later years of his life, Martin Luther King, Jr. expanded his focus beyond civil rights, turning his attention to issues of economic justice and global peace. This shift in focus offers valuable insights into the importance of adaptability, evolution, and self-reflection in effective leadership. In this section, we will discuss King’s shift towards economic justice and global peace, explore the lessons on adapting and evolving as a leader, and examine the power of humility and continued self-reflection.

The Shift Towards Economic Justice and Global Peace

As the civil rights movement began to achieve some of its major goals, King recognized that the struggle for true equality extended beyond the realm of race and encompassed broader issues of economic justice and global peace. He began to advocate for policies to address poverty, unemployment, and income inequality, arguing that these issues were inextricably linked to the ongoing struggle for racial justice.

King also emerged as a vocal critic of the Vietnam War and an advocate for global peace, emphasizing the moral and humanitarian consequences of war and the need for nonviolent solutions to international conflicts. These positions, while controversial at the time, underscored King’s commitment to the principles of nonviolence and justice that had been at the heart of his work since the beginning of the civil rights movement.

Lessons on Adapting and Evolving as a Leader

King’s expanding vision and his willingness to tackle new challenges and issues demonstrate the importance of adaptability and evolution in effective leadership. As a leader, it is essential to recognize that the needs and priorities of those you serve may change over time and to adapt your approach accordingly. By embracing new challenges and expanding the scope of his work, King was able to maintain his relevance and effectiveness as a leader even as the political and social landscape shifted around him.

Moreover, King’s ability to evolve and adapt as a leader highlights the importance of staying attuned to the broader context in which one operates and being willing to reassess one’s goals and strategies in response to changing circumstances. This willingness to change and grow is an essential quality for leaders in any field, as it enables them to stay responsive to the needs of their followers and to stay ahead of emerging challenges and opportunities.

The Power of Humility and Continued Self-Reflection

Throughout his life, Martin Luther King, Jr. demonstrated a remarkable degree of humility and self-reflection, qualities that are critical to effective leadership. Despite the accolades and praise he received for his work, King remained grounded in his commitment to the cause of justice and continually sought to learn from his experiences and to grow as a leader.

This humility and self-reflection enabled King to recognize the limitations of his earlier work and to expand his focus to encompass broader issues of economic justice and global peace. By remaining open to new ideas and perspectives and by continually reevaluating his goals and strategies, King was able to evolve as a leader and to ensure that his work remained relevant and impactful.

The later years of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s life and his expanding vision offer valuable lessons on the importance of adaptability, evolution, and self-reflection in leadership. By studying King’s shift towards economic justice and global peace, as well as his willingness to grow and change as a leader, we can gain valuable insights into the qualities and practices that enable effective leadership in a constantly changing world. The power of humility and continued self-reflection, as demonstrated by King, serves as an important reminder of the need for leaders to remain grounded in their values and committed to learning and growth throughout their lives.

Legacy and Enduring Leadership Lessons

The life and work of Martin Luther King, Jr. continue to resonate in today’s world, offering a wealth of wisdom and inspiration to current and future generations of leaders. In this final section, we will discuss the continued relevance of King’s teachings, explore the importance of servant leadership and social justice, and consider how future leaders can learn from King’s example.

The Continued Relevance of King’s Teachings Today

While the specific challenges and issues that King confronted during his lifetime may have evolved, the core principles and values that underpinned his work remain as relevant today as they were in the 1960s. His commitment to nonviolence, social justice, and the power of grassroots activism continue to inspire and inform contemporary movements for change, both in the United States and around the world.

Moreover, King’s teachings on the importance of empathy, moral courage, and the pursuit of a clear and compelling vision offer valuable guidance to leaders in a wide range of fields and contexts. By embracing these principles and applying them in our own lives and work, we can help to create a more just and equitable world, one in which the dignity and worth of every human being are recognized and respected.

The Importance of Servant Leadership and Social Justice

One of the most enduring aspects of King’s legacy is his emphasis on the concept of servant leadership, the idea that effective leaders are those who put the needs and well-being of their followers first and who view their primary responsibility as serving the greater good. This approach to leadership, which prioritizes humility, empathy, and the pursuit of justice, stands in stark contrast to more hierarchical and self-serving models of leadership that often dominate contemporary discourse.

The ongoing struggle for social justice around the world underscores the need for leaders who are committed to the principles of servant leadership and who recognize the interconnected nature of various forms of inequality and discrimination. By embracing this approach to leadership, we can help to ensure that our efforts to create positive change are grounded in a deep commitment to the well-being and empowerment of those we serve.

Encouraging Future Leaders to Learn from King’s Example

As we reflect on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the enduring leadership lessons that his life and work offer, it is important that we encourage future leaders to learn from his example and to apply the principles and values he embodied in their own lives and work.

This can be achieved by promoting a deeper understanding of King’s teachings and by providing opportunities for young people to engage with his writings, speeches, and activism. By fostering a culture of learning and reflection that is grounded in the principles of servant leadership, social justice, and moral courage, we can help to ensure that the next generation of leaders is equipped with the tools and insights they need to navigate the complex challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

The legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. offers a rich and enduring source of inspiration and guidance for leaders in the 21st century. By embracing the principles of servant leadership, social justice, and moral courage that King championed, and by encouraging future leaders to learn from his example, we can help to create a more just, equitable, and compassionate world for all.

Embracing the Timeless Wisdom of Martin Luther King, Jr.

As we have explored throughout this article, the life and work of Martin Luther King, Jr. offer a wealth of insights and lessons for leaders across all fields and contexts. From his unwavering commitment to nonviolence and social justice to his remarkable capacity for empathy and moral courage, King’s leadership provides a powerful example of the qualities and strategies that can enable individuals and organizations to create meaningful change in the world.

In examining the various stages of King’s journey, from the Montgomery Bus Boycott to the later years of his life, we have seen how his leadership evolved and adapted to the changing needs and priorities of the civil rights movement and the broader struggle for justice and equality. This willingness to grow and change, coupled with King’s deep sense of humility and self-reflection, serve as a reminder of the importance of remaining open to new ideas and perspectives, even as we strive to stay true to our core values and principles.

By embracing the concept of servant leadership and by placing the well-being and empowerment of others at the heart of our work, we can help to ensure that our efforts to create positive change are grounded in a deep commitment to the dignity and worth of every human being. This approach to leadership, which emphasizes empathy, compassion, and the pursuit of a clear and compelling vision, offers a powerful antidote to the more hierarchical and self-serving models of leadership that often dominate contemporary discourse.

As we look to the future, it is essential that we continue to learn from the example of Martin Luther King, Jr. and to apply the principles and values he embodied in our own lives and work. By fostering a culture of learning and reflection that is grounded in the timeless wisdom of King’s teachings, we can equip the next generation of leaders with the tools and insights they need to navigate the complex challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

In conclusion, the life and work of Martin Luther King, Jr. offer a rich and enduring source of inspiration and guidance for those seeking to make a meaningful impact in the world. By embracing the principles of nonviolence, social justice, and servant leadership that defined King’s life, and by encouraging future leaders to learn from his example, we can help to create a more just, equitable, and compassionate world for all. As we continue to confront the myriad challenges and opportunities that define our era, the wisdom and vision of Martin Luther King, Jr. remain as relevant and vital today as they were more than half a century ago.

Similar Posts

Lead Without a Title: Becoming the Kind of Leader People Follow Without Hesitation

The Power of Leadership Without a Title Leadership is a crucial component of any organization, from the boardroom to the factory floor. Effective leaders can inspire and motivate their teams, cultivate a positive company culture, and drive innovation and growth. However, leadership is not limited to those with formal titles or positions. In fact, some…

The Empathy Edge: How Developing Empathy Boosts Leadership Impact

The Role of Empathy in Effective Leadership Effective leadership requires many different skills and attributes, including strategic thinking, communication, and decision-making. However, one trait that is often overlooked is empathy. Empathy is the ability to understand and share the feelings of another person. It is an essential component of emotional intelligence and can be a…

The Power of Response: Effective Leadership in Challenging Times

Choosing Your Response: The Art of Effective Leadership Leadership is a critical aspect of any successful organization. As a leader, you are expected to provide direction, guidance, and inspiration to your team to achieve the organization’s goals. However, leadership can be challenging, especially during times of uncertainty and unexpected situations. In these moments, your response…

Leading Beyond “Fine”: Building a Culture of Leadership

Why “Fine” Isn’t Enough: The Importance of Effective Leadership Leadership is a complex and dynamic concept that has been the subject of countless studies, debates, and discussions. At its core, leadership is about guiding and inspiring people to achieve their goals, both individually and collectively. While there is no single definition of leadership, most experts…

The Growth Mindset of Satya Nadella: Lessons in Leadership and Innovation

Leading with a Growth Mindset: The Philosophy of Satya Nadella Satya Nadella, the current CEO of Microsoft, has been making waves in the tech industry since he took the helm in 2014. With his “growth mindset” approach to leadership, Nadella has transformed Microsoft’s culture and business strategy, leading the company to unprecedented success. Nadella’s leadership…

Leading the Way: 5 Essential Traits of Effective Leadership

The Importance of Being a Positive, Committed, Trustworthy, Focused, and Humble Leader Leadership is not just about holding a position of authority or having a fancy title. It is about leading by example, demonstrating integrity, and inspiring others to be their best selves. In order to achieve this, a leader must possess a variety of…

• History Classics
• Your Profile
• Find History on Facebook (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on Twitter (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on YouTube (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on Instagram (Opens in a new window)
• Find History on TikTok (Opens in a new window)
• This Day In History
• History Podcasts
• History Vault

Martin Luther King Jr.

By: History.com Editors

Updated: January 25, 2024 | Original: November 9, 2009

Martin Luther King Jr. was a social activist and Baptist minister who played a key role in the American civil rights movement from the mid-1950s until his assassination in 1968. King sought equality and human rights for African Americans, the economically disadvantaged and all victims of injustice through peaceful protest. He was the driving force behind watershed events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the 1963 March on Washington , which helped bring about such landmark legislation as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act . King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 and is remembered each year on Martin Luther King Jr. Day , a U.S. federal holiday since 1986.

When Was Martin Luther King Born?

Martin Luther King Jr. was born on January 15, 1929, in Atlanta, Georgia , the second child of Martin Luther King Sr., a pastor, and Alberta Williams King, a former schoolteacher.

Along with his older sister Christine and younger brother Alfred Daniel Williams, he grew up in the city’s Sweet Auburn neighborhood, then home to some of the most prominent and prosperous African Americans in the country.

Did you know? The final section of Martin Luther King Jr.’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech is believed to have been largely improvised.

A gifted student, King attended segregated public schools and at the age of 15 was admitted to Morehouse College , the alma mater of both his father and maternal grandfather, where he studied medicine and law.

Although he had not intended to follow in his father’s footsteps by joining the ministry, he changed his mind under the mentorship of Morehouse’s president, Dr. Benjamin Mays, an influential theologian and outspoken advocate for racial equality. After graduating in 1948, King entered Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania, where he earned a Bachelor of Divinity degree, won a prestigious fellowship and was elected president of his predominantly white senior class.

King then enrolled in a graduate program at Boston University, completing his coursework in 1953 and earning a doctorate in systematic theology two years later. While in Boston he met Coretta Scott, a young singer from Alabama who was studying at the New England Conservatory of Music . The couple wed in 1953 and settled in Montgomery, Alabama, where King became pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church .

The Kings had four children: Yolanda Denise King, Martin Luther King III, Dexter Scott King and Bernice Albertine King.

Montgomery Bus Boycott

The King family had been living in Montgomery for less than a year when the highly segregated city became the epicenter of the burgeoning struggle for civil rights in America, galvanized by the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision of 1954.

On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks , secretary of the local chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ( NAACP ), refused to give up her seat to a white passenger on a Montgomery bus and was arrested. Activists coordinated a bus boycott that would continue for 381 days. The Montgomery Bus Boycott placed a severe economic strain on the public transit system and downtown business owners. They chose Martin Luther King Jr. as the protest’s leader and official spokesman.

By the time the Supreme Court ruled segregated seating on public buses unconstitutional in November 1956, King—heavily influenced by Mahatma Gandhi and the activist Bayard Rustin —had entered the national spotlight as an inspirational proponent of organized, nonviolent resistance.

King had also become a target for white supremacists, who firebombed his family home that January.

On September 20, 1958, Izola Ware Curry walked into a Harlem department store where King was signing books and asked, “Are you Martin Luther King?” When he replied “yes,” she stabbed him in the chest with a knife. King survived, and the attempted assassination only reinforced his dedication to nonviolence: “The experience of these last few days has deepened my faith in the relevance of the spirit of nonviolence if necessary social change is peacefully to take place.”

Southern Christian Leadership Conference

Emboldened by the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, in 1957 he and other civil rights activists—most of them fellow ministers—founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), a group committed to achieving full equality for African Americans through nonviolent protest.

The SCLC motto was “Not one hair of one head of one person should be harmed.” King would remain at the helm of this influential organization until his death.

In his role as SCLC president, Martin Luther King Jr. traveled across the country and around the world, giving lectures on nonviolent protest and civil rights as well as meeting with religious figures, activists and political leaders.

During a month-long trip to India in 1959, he had the opportunity to meet family members and followers of Gandhi, the man he described in his autobiography as “the guiding light of our technique of nonviolent social change.” King also authored several books and articles during this time.

Letter from Birmingham Jail

In 1960 King and his family moved to Atlanta, his native city, where he joined his father as co-pastor of the Ebenezer Baptist Church . This new position did not stop King and his SCLC colleagues from becoming key players in many of the most significant civil rights battles of the 1960s.

Their philosophy of nonviolence was put to a particularly severe test during the Birmingham campaign of 1963, in which activists used a boycott, sit-ins and marches to protest segregation, unfair hiring practices and other injustices in one of America’s most racially divided cities.

Arrested for his involvement on April 12, King penned the civil rights manifesto known as the “ Letter from Birmingham Jail ,” an eloquent defense of civil disobedience addressed to a group of white clergymen who had criticized his tactics.

March on Washington

Later that year, Martin Luther King Jr. worked with a number of civil rights and religious groups to organize the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, a peaceful political rally designed to shed light on the injustices Black Americans continued to face across the country.

Held on August 28 and attended by some 200,000 to 300,000 participants, the event is widely regarded as a watershed moment in the history of the American civil rights movement and a factor in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .

"I Have a Dream" Speech

The March on Washington culminated in King’s most famous address, known as the “I Have a Dream” speech, a spirited call for peace and equality that many consider a masterpiece of rhetoric.

Standing on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial —a monument to the president who a century earlier had brought down the institution of slavery in the United States—he shared his vision of a future in which “this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'”

The speech and march cemented King’s reputation at home and abroad; later that year he was named “Man of the Year” by TIME magazine and in 1964 became, at the time, the youngest person ever awarded the Nobel Peace Prize .

In the spring of 1965, King’s elevated profile drew international attention to the violence that erupted between white segregationists and peaceful demonstrators in Selma, Alabama, where the SCLC and Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) had organized a voter registration campaign.

Captured on television, the brutal scene outraged many Americans and inspired supporters from across the country to gather in Alabama and take part in the Selma to Montgomery march led by King and supported by President Lyndon B. Johnson , who sent in federal troops to keep the peace.

That August, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act , which guaranteed the right to vote—first awarded by the 15th Amendment—to all African Americans.

Assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.

The events in Selma deepened a growing rift between Martin Luther King Jr. and young radicals who repudiated his nonviolent methods and commitment to working within the established political framework.

As more militant Black leaders such as Stokely Carmichael rose to prominence, King broadened the scope of his activism to address issues such as the Vietnam War and poverty among Americans of all races. In 1967, King and the SCLC embarked on an ambitious program known as the Poor People’s Campaign, which was to include a massive march on the capital.

On the evening of April 4, 1968, Martin Luther King was assassinated . He was fatally shot while standing on the balcony of a motel in Memphis, where King had traveled to support a sanitation workers’ strike. In the wake of his death, a wave of riots swept major cities across the country, while President Johnson declared a national day of mourning.

James Earl Ray , an escaped convict and known racist, pleaded guilty to the murder and was sentenced to 99 years in prison. He later recanted his confession and gained some unlikely advocates, including members of the King family, before his death in 1998.

After years of campaigning by activists, members of Congress and Coretta Scott King, among others, in 1983 President Ronald Reagan signed a bill creating a U.S. federal holiday in honor of King.

Observed on the third Monday of January, Martin Luther King Day was first celebrated in 1986.

Martin Luther King Jr. Quotes

While his “I Have a Dream” speech is the most well-known piece of his writing, Martin Luther King Jr. was the author of multiple books, include “Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story,” “Why We Can’t Wait,” “Strength to Love,” “Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?” and the posthumously published “Trumpet of Conscience” with a foreword by Coretta Scott King. Here are some of the most famous Martin Luther King Jr. quotes:

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

“Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”

“The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.”

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”

“The time is always right to do what is right.”

"True peace is not merely the absence of tension; it is the presence of justice."

“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”

“Free at last, Free at last, Thank God almighty we are free at last.”

“Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase.”

“In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”

"I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality. This is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant."

“I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.”

“Be a bush if you can't be a tree. If you can't be a highway, just be a trail. If you can't be a sun, be a star. For it isn't by size that you win or fail. Be the best of whatever you are.”

“Life's most persistent and urgent question is, 'What are you doing for others?’”

Photo Galleries

HISTORY Vault: Voices of Civil Rights

A look at one of the defining social movements in U.S. history, told through the personal stories of men, women and children who lived through it.

Sign up for Inside History

Get HISTORY’s most fascinating stories delivered to your inbox three times a week.

By submitting your information, you agree to receive emails from HISTORY and A+E Networks. You can opt out at any time. You must be 16 years or older and a resident of the United States.

More details : Privacy Notice | Terms of Use | Contact Us

Martin Luther King Jr.

Martin Luther King Jr. was a Baptist minister and major leader of the Civil Rights Movement. After his assassination, he was memorialized by Martin Luther King Jr. Day.

We may earn commission from links on this page, but we only recommend products we back.

In Focus: Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Days after his 1968 assassination , a campaign for a holiday in King’s honor began. U.S. Representative John Conyers Jr. of Michigan first proposed a bill on April 8, 1968, but the first vote on the legislation didn’t happen until 1979. King’s widow, Coretta Scott King , led the lobbying effort to drum up public support. Fifteen years after its introduction, the bill finally became law.

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan ’s signature created Martin Luther King Jr. Day of Service as a federal holiday. It’s celebrated annually on the third Monday in January. The only national day of service, Martin Luther King Jr. Day was first celebrated in 1986. The first time all 50 states recognized the holiday was in 2000.

See Martin Luther King Jr.’s life depicted onscreen in the 2018 documentary I Am MLK Jr. or the Oscar-winning movie Selma .

Quick Facts

Where did martin luther king jr. go to school, philosophy of nonviolence, civil rights accomplishments, "i have a dream" and other famous speeches, wife and kids, fbi surveillance, later activism, assassination, who was martin luther king jr.

Martin Luther King Jr. was a Baptist minister and civil rights activist who had a seismic impact on race relations in the United States, beginning in the mid-1950s. Among his many efforts, King headed the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC). Through his nonviolent activism and inspirational speeches , he played a pivotal role in ending legal segregation of Black Americans, as well as the creation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 . King won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, among several other honors. He was assassinated by James Earl Ray and died on April 4, 1968, at age 39. King continues to be remembered as one of the most influential and inspirational Black leaders in history.

FULL NAME: Martin Luther King Jr. BIRTHDAY: January 15, 1929 DIED: April 4, 1968 BIRTHPLACE: Atlanta, Georgia SPOUSE: Coretta Scott King (1953-1968) CHILDREN: Yolanda, Martin III, Dexter, and Bernice King ASTROLOGICAL SIGN: Capricorn

Martin Luther King Jr. was born as Michael Luther King Jr. in Atlanta. His birthday was January 15, 1929.

His parents were Michael Luther King Sr. and Alberta Williams King. The Williams and King families had roots in rural Georgia. Martin’s maternal grandfather, A.D. Williams, was a rural minister for years and then moved to Atlanta in 1893. He took over the small, struggling Ebenezer Baptist Church with around 13 members and made it into a forceful congregation. He married Jennie Celeste Parks, and they had one child who survived, Alberta.

Michael Sr. came from a family of sharecroppers in a poor farming community. He married Alberta in 1926 after an eight-year courtship. The newlyweds moved to A.D.’s home in Atlanta. Michael stepped in as pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church upon the death of his father-in-law in 1931. He, too, became a successful minister and adopted the name Martin Luther King Sr. in honor of the German Protestant religious leader Martin Luther . In due time, Michael Jr. followed his father’s lead and adopt the name himself to become Martin Luther King Jr.

A middle child, Martin Jr. had an older sister, Willie, and a younger brother, Alfred. The King children grew up in a secure and loving environment. Martin Sr. was more the disciplinarian, while Alberta’s gentleness easily balanced out their father’s strict hand.

Although they undoubtedly tried, Martin Jr.’s parents couldn’t shield him completely from racism. His father fought against racial prejudice, not just because his race suffered, but also because he considered racism and segregation to be an affront to God’s will. He strongly discouraged any sense of class superiority in his children, which left a lasting impression on Martin Jr.

Growing up in Atlanta, King entered public school at age 5. In May 1936, he was baptized, but the event made little impression on him.

In May 1941, King was 12 years old when his grandmother Jennie died of a heart attack. The event was traumatic for the boy, more so because he was out watching a parade against his parents’ wishes when she died. Distraught at the news, young King jumped from a second-story window at the family home, allegedly attempting suicide.

King attended Booker T. Washington High School, where he was said to be a precocious student. He skipped both the ninth and eleventh grades and, at age 15, entered Morehouse College in Atlanta in 1944. He was a popular student, especially with his female classmates, but largely unmotivated, floating through his first two years.

Influenced by his experiences with racism, King began planting the seeds for a future as a social activist early in his time at Morehouse. “I was at the point where I was deeply interested in political matters and social ills,” he recalled in The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr . “I could envision myself playing a part in breaking down the legal barriers to Negro rights.”

The Autobiography of Martin Luther King, Jr.

At the time, King felt that the best way to serve that purpose was as a lawyer or a doctor. Although his family was deeply involved in the church and worship, King questioned religion in general and felt uncomfortable with overly emotional displays of religious worship. This discomfort had continued through much of his adolescence, initially leading him to decide against entering the ministry, much to his father’s dismay.

But in his junior year, King took a Bible class, renewed his faith, and began to envision a career in the ministry. In the fall of his senior year, he told his father of his decision, and he was ordained at Ebenezer Baptist Church in February 1948.

Later that year, King earned a sociology degree from Morehouse College and began attended the liberal Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pennsylvania. He thrived in all his studies, was elected student body president, and was valedictorian of his class in 1951. He also earned a fellowship for graduate study.

Even though King was following his father’s footsteps, he rebelled against Martin Sr.’s more conservative influence by drinking beer and playing pool while at college. He became romantically involved with a white woman and went through a difficult time before he could break off the relationship.

During his last year in seminary, King came under the guidance of Morehouse College President Benjamin E. Mays, who influenced King’s spiritual development. Mays was an outspoken advocate for racial equality and encouraged King to view Christianity as a potential force for social change.

After being accepted at several colleges for his doctoral study, King enrolled at Boston University. In 1954, while still working on his dissertation, King became pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church of Montgomery, Alabama. He completed his doctorate and earned his degree in 1955 at age 25.

Decades after King’s death, in the late 1980s, researchers at Stanford University’s King Papers Project began to note similarities between passages of King’s doctoral dissertation and those of another student’s work. A committee of scholars appointed by Boston University determined that King was guilty of plagiarism in 1991, though it also recommended against the revocation of his degree.

First exposed to the concept of nonviolent resistance while reading Henry David Thoreau ’s On Civil Disobedience at Morehouse, King later discovered a powerful exemplar of the method’s possibilities through his research into the life of Mahatma Gandhi . Fellow civil rights activist Bayard Rustin , who had also studied Gandhi’s teachings, became one of King’s associates in the 1950s and counseled him to dedicate himself to the principles of nonviolence.

As explained in his autobiography , King previously felt that the peaceful teachings of Jesus applied mainly to individual relationships, not large-scale confrontations. But he came to realize: “Love for Gandhi was a potent instrument for social and collective transformation. It was in this Gandhian emphasis on love and nonviolence that I discovered the method for social reform that I had been seeking.”

It led to the formation of King’s six principles of nonviolence :

• Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people.
• Nonviolence seeks to win friendship and understanding.
• Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice, not people.
• Nonviolence holds that suffering for a just cause can educate and transform.
• Nonviolence chooses love instead of hate.
• Nonviolence believes that the universe is on the side of justice.

In the years to come, King also frequently cited the “ Beloved Community ”—a world in which a shared spirit of compassion brings an end to the evils of racism, poverty, inequality, and violence—as the end goal of his activist efforts.

Led by his religious convictions and philosophy of nonviolence, King became one of the most prominent figures of the Civil Rights Movement . He was a founding member of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and played key roles in several major demonstrations that transformed society. This included the Montgomery Bus Boycott that integrated Alabama’s public transit, the Greensboro Sit-In movement that desegregated lunch counters across the South, the March on Washington that led to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the Selma-to-Montgomery marches in Alabama that culminated in the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

King’s efforts earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 when he was 35.

Montgomery Bus Boycott

King’s first leadership role within the Civil Rights Movement was during the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955–1956. The 381-day protest integrated the Alabama city’s public transit in one of the largest and most successful mass movements against racial segregation in history.

The effort began on December 1, 1955, when 42-year-old Rosa Parks boarded the Cleveland Avenue bus to go home after an exhausting day at work. She sat in the first row of the “colored” section in the middle of the bus. As the bus traveled its route, all the seats in the white section filled up, then several more white passengers boarded the bus.

The bus driver noted that there were several white men standing and demanded that Parks and several other African Americans give up their seats. Three other Black passengers reluctantly gave up their places, but Parks remained seated.

The driver asked her again to give up her seat, and again she refused. Parks was arrested and booked for violating the Montgomery City Code. At her trial a week later, in a 30-minute hearing, Parks was found guilty and fined $10 and assessed $4 court fee.

The local NAACP chapter had been looking to challenge Montgomery’s segregated bus policy and had almost made 15-year-old Claudette Colvin the face of the campaign months earlier. She similarly refused to give up her bus seat to a white man on March 2, 1955, but after organizers learned Colvin was pregnant, they feared it would scandalize the deeply religious Black community and make Colvin, along with the group’s efforts, less credible in the eyes of sympathetic white people. Parks’ experience of discrimination provided another opportunity.

On the night Parks was arrested, E.D. Nixon , head of the local NAACP chapter, met with King and other local civil rights leaders to plan a Montgomery Bus Boycott. King was elected to lead the boycott because he was young, well-trained, and had solid family connections and professional standing. He was also new to the community and had few enemies, so organizers felt he would have strong credibility with the Black community.

In his first speech as the group’s president, King declared:

“We have no alternative but to protest. For many years, we have shown an amazing patience. We have sometimes given our white brothers the feeling that we liked the way we were being treated. But we come here tonight to be saved from that patience that makes us patient with anything less than freedom and justice.”

King’s skillful rhetoric put new energy into the civil rights struggle in Alabama. The Montgomery Bus Boycott began December 5, 1955, and for more than a year, the local Black community walked to work, coordinated ride sharing, and faced harassment, violence, and intimidation. Both King’s and Nixon’s homes were attacked.

In addition to the boycott, members of the Black community took legal action against the city ordinance that outlined the segregated transit system. They argued it was unconstitutional based on the U.S. Supreme Court ’s “separate is never equal” decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Several lower courts agreed, and the nation’s Supreme Court upheld the ruling in a November 13, 1956, decision that also ruled the state of Alabama’s bus segregation laws were unconstitutional.

After the legal defeats and large financial losses, the city of Montgomery lifted the law that mandated segregated public transportation. The boycott ended on December 20, 1956.

Southern Christian Leadership Conference

Flush with victory, African American civil rights leaders recognized the need for a national organization to help coordinate their efforts. In January 1957, King, Ralph Abernathy , and 60 ministers and civil rights activists founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference to harness the moral authority and organizing power of Black churches. The SCLC helped conduct nonviolent protests to promote civil rights reform.

King’s participation in the organization gave him a base of operation throughout the South, as well as a national platform. The SCLC felt the best place to start to give African Americans a voice was to enfranchise them in the voting process. In February 1958, the SCLC sponsored more than 20 mass meetings in key southern cities to register Black voters. King met with religious and civil rights leaders and lectured all over the country on race-related issues.

Stride Toward Freedom: The Montgomery Story

That September, King survived an attempt on his life when a woman with mental illness stabbed him in the chest as he signed copies of his book Stride Toward Freedom in a New York City department store. Saved by quick medical attention, King expressed sympathy for his assailant’s condition in the aftermath .

In 1959, with the help of the American Friends Service Committee, King visited Gandhi ’s birthplace in India. The trip affected him in a profound way, increasing his commitment to America’s civil rights struggle.

Greensboro Sit-In

By 1960, King was gaining national exposure. He returned to Atlanta to become co-pastor with his father at Ebenezer Baptist Church but also continued his civil rights efforts. His next activist campaign was the student-led Greensboro Sit-In movement.

In February 1960, a group of Black students in Greensboro, North Carolina , began sitting at racially segregated lunch counters in the city’s stores. When asked to leave or sit in the “colored” section, they just remained seated, subjecting themselves to verbal and sometimes physical abuse.

The movement quickly gained traction in several other cities. That April, the SCLC held a conference at Shaw University in Raleigh, North Carolina, with local sit-in leaders. King encouraged students to continue to use nonviolent methods during their protests. Out of this meeting, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) formed and, for a time, worked closely with the SCLC. By August 1960, the sit-ins had successfully ended segregation at lunch counters in 27 southern cities. But the movement wasn’t done yet.

On October 19, 1960, King and 75 students entered a local department store and requested lunch-counter service but were denied. When they refused to leave the counter area, King and 36 others were arrested. Realizing the incident would hurt the city’s reputation, Atlanta’s mayor negotiated a truce, and charges were eventually dropped.

Soon after, King was imprisoned for violating his probation on a traffic conviction. The news of his imprisonment entered the 1960 presidential campaign when candidate John F. Kennedy made a phone call to Martin’s wife, Coretta Scott King . Kennedy expressed his concern over the harsh treatment Martin received for the traffic ticket, and political pressure was quickly set in motion. King was soon released.

Letter from Birmingham Jail

In the spring of 1963, King organized a demonstration in downtown Birmingham, Alabama. With entire families in attendance, city police turned dogs and fire hoses on demonstrators. King was jailed, along with large numbers of his supporters.

The event drew nationwide attention. However, King was personally criticized by Black and white clergy alike for taking risks and endangering the children who attended the demonstration.

In his famous Letter from Birmingham Jail , King eloquently spelled out his theory of nonviolence: “Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community, which has constantly refused to negotiate, is forced to confront the issue.”

1963 March on Washington

By the end of the Birmingham campaign, King and his supporters were making plans for a massive demonstration on the nation’s capital composed of multiple organizations, all asking for peaceful change. The demonstration was the brainchild of labor leader A. Philip Randolph and King’s one-time mentor Bayard Rustin .

On August 28, 1963, the historic March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom drew an estimated 250,000 people in the shadow of the Lincoln Memorial. It remains one of the largest peaceful demonstrations in American history. During the demonstration, King delivered his famed “I Have a Dream” speech .

The rising tide of civil rights agitation that had culminated in the March on Washington produced a strong effect on public opinion. Many people in cities not experiencing racial tension began to question the nation’s Jim Crow laws and the near-century of second-class treatment of African American citizens since the end of slavery. This resulted in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , authorizing the federal government to enforce desegregation of public accommodations and outlawing discrimination in publicly owned facilities.

Selma March

Continuing to focus on voting rights, King, the SCLC, SNCC, and local organizers planned to march peacefully from Selma, Alabama, to the state’s capital, Montgomery.

Led by John Lewis and Hosea Williams , demonstrators set out on March 7, 1965. But the Selma march quickly turned violent as police with nightsticks and tear gas met the demonstrators as they tried to cross the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma. The attack was televised, broadcasting the horrifying images of marchers being bloodied and severely injured to a wide audience. Of the 600 demonstrators, 58 were hospitalized in a day that became known as “ Bloody Sunday .” King, however, was spared because he was in Atlanta.

Not to be deterred, activists attempted the Selma-to-Montgomery march again. This time, King made sure he was part of it. Because a federal judge had issued a temporary restraining order on another march, a different approach was taken.

On March 9, 1965, a procession of 2,500 marchers, both Black and white, set out once again to cross the Pettus Bridge and confronted barricades and state troopers. Instead of forcing a confrontation, King led his followers to kneel in prayer, then they turned back. This became known as “Turnaround Tuesday.”

Alabama Governor George Wallace continued to try to prevent another march until President Lyndon B. Johnson pledged his support and ordered U.S. Army troops and the Alabama National Guard to protect the protestors.

On March 21, 1965, approximately 2,000 people began a march from Selma to Montgomery. On March 25, the number of marchers, which had grown to an estimated 25,000 gathered in front of the state capitol where King delivered a televised speech. Five months after the historic peaceful protest, President Johnson signed the 1965 Voting Rights Act .

Along with his “I Have a Dream” and “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” speeches, King delivered several acclaimed addresses over the course of his life in the public eye.

“I Have A Dream” Speech

Date: august 28, 1963.

King gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech during the 1963 March on Washington. Standing at the Lincoln Memorial, he emphasized his belief that someday all men could be brothers to the 250,000-strong crowd.

Notable Quote: “I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

“Give Us the Ballot” Speech

Date: may 17, 1957.

Six years before he told the world of his dream, King stood at the same Lincoln Memorial steps as the final speaker of the Prayer Pilgrimage for Freedom. Dismayed by the ongoing obstacles to registering Black voters, King urged leaders from various backgrounds—Republican and Democrat, Black and white—to work together in the name of justice.

Notable Quote: “Give us the ballot, and we will no longer have to worry the federal government about our basic rights. Give us the ballot, and we will no longer plead to the federal government for passage of an anti-lynching law... Give us the ballot, and we will transform the salient misdeeds of bloodthirsty mobs into the calculated good deeds of orderly citizens.”

Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech

Date: december 10, 1964.

Speaking at the University of Oslo in Norway, King pondered why he was receiving the Nobel Prize when the battle for racial justice was far from over, before acknowledging that it was in recognition of the power of nonviolent resistance. He then compared the foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement to the ground crew at an airport who do the unheralded-yet-necessary work to keep planes running on schedule.

Notable Quote: “I think Alfred Nobel would know what I mean when I say that I accept this award in the spirit of a curator of some precious heirloom which he holds in trust for its true owners—all those to whom beauty is truth and truth, beauty—and in whose eyes the beauty of genuine brotherhood and peace is more precious than diamonds or silver or gold.”

“Our God is Marching On (How Long? Not Long)” Speech

Date: march 25, 1965.

At the end of the bitterly fought Selma-to-Montgomery march, King addressed a crowd of 25,000 supporters from the Alabama State Capitol. Offering a brief history lesson on the roots of segregation, King emphasized that there would be no stopping the effort to secure full voting rights, while suggesting a more expansive agenda to come with a call to march on poverty.

Notable Quote: “I come to say to you this afternoon, however difficult the moment, however frustrating the hour, it will not be long, because ‘truth crushed to earth will rise again.’ How long? Not long, because ‘no lie can live forever.’... How long? Not long, because the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”

“Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence” Speech

Date: april 4, 1967.

One year before his assassination, King delivered a controversial sermon at New York City’s Riverside Church in which he condemned the Vietnam War. Explaining why his conscience had forced him to speak up, King expressed concern for the poor American soldiers pressed into conflict thousands of miles from home, while pointedly faulting the U.S. government’s role in escalating the war.

Notable Quote: “We still have a choice today: nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation. We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace in Vietnam and justice throughout the developing world, a world that borders on our doors. If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality, and strength without sight.”

“I’ve Been to the Mountaintop” Speech

Date: april 3, 1968.

The well-known orator delivered his final speech the day before he died at the Mason Temple in Memphis, Tennessee. King reflected on major moments of progress in history and his own life, in addition to encouraging the city’s striking sanitation workers.

Notable Quote: “I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight that we, as a people, will get to the promised land.”

While working on his doctorate at Boston University, King met Coretta Scott , an aspiring singer and musician at the New England Conservatory school in Boston. They were married on June 18, 1953, and had four children—two daughters and two sons—over the next decade. Their oldest, Yolanda, was born in 1955, followed by sons Martin Luther King III in 1957 and Dexter in 1961. The couple welcomed Bernice King in 1963.

Although she accepted the responsibility to raise the children while King travelled the country, Coretta opened their home to organizational meetings and served as an advisor and sounding board for her husband. “I am convinced that if I had not had a wife with the fortitude, strength, and calmness of Corrie, I could not have withstood the ordeals and tensions surrounding the movement,” King wrote in his autobiography.

His lengthy absences became a way of life for their children, but Martin III remembered his father returning from the road to join the kids playing in the yard or bring them to the local YMCA for swimming. King also fostered discussions at mealtimes to make sure everyone understood the important issues he was seeking to resolve.

Leery of accumulating wealth as a high-profile figure, King insisted his family live off his salary as a pastor. However, he was known to splurge on good suits and fine dining, while contrasting his serious public image with a lively sense of humor among friends and family.

Due to his relationships with alleged Communists, King became a target of FBI surveillance and, from late 1963 until his death, a campaign to discredit the civil rights activist. While FBI wiretaps failed to produce evidence of Communist sympathies, they captured the civil rights leader’s engagement in extramarital dalliances. This led to the infamous “suicide letter” of 1964, later confirmed to be from the FBI and authorized by then-Director J. Edgar Hoover , which urged King to kill himself if he wanted to prevent news of his affairs from going public.

In 2019, historian David Garrow wrote of explosive new allegations against King following his review of recently released FBI documents. Among the discoveries was a memo suggesting that King had encouraged the rape of a parishioner in a hotel room, as well as evidence that he might have fathered a daughter with a mistress. Other historians questioned the veracity of the documentation, especially given the FBI’s known attempts to damage King’s reputation. The original surveillance tapes regarding these allegations are under judicial seal until 2027.

From late 1965 through 1967, King expanded his civil rights efforts into other larger American cities, including Chicago and Los Angeles. But he met with increasing criticism and public challenges from young Black power leaders. King’s patient, non-violent approach and appeal to white middle-class citizens alienated many Black militants who considered his methods too weak, too late, and ineffective.

To address this criticism, King began making a link between discrimination and poverty, and he began to speak out against the Vietnam War . He felt America’s involvement in Vietnam was politically untenable and the government’s conduct in the war was discriminatory to the poor. He sought to broaden his base by forming a multiracial coalition to address the economic and unemployment problems of all disadvantaged people. To that end, plans were in the works for another march on Washington to highlight the Poor People’s Campaign, a movement intended to pressure the government into improving living and working conditions for the economically disadvantaged.

By 1968, the years of demonstrations and confrontations were beginning to wear on King. He had grown tired of marches, going to jail, and living under the constant threat of death. He was becoming discouraged at the slow progress of civil rights in America and the increasing criticism from other African American leaders.

In the spring of 1968, a labor strike by Memphis, Tennessee, sanitation workers drew King to one last crusade. On April 3, 1968, he gave his final and what proved to be an eerily prophetic speech, “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop,” in which he told supporters, “Like anybody, I would like to live a long life. Longevity has its place. But I’m not concerned about that now… I’m not worried about anything. I’m not fearing any man. Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.”

While standing on a balcony outside his room at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by a sniper’s bullet on April 4, 1968. King died at age 39. The shocking assassination sparked riots and demonstrations in more than 100 cities across the country.

The shooter was James Earl Ray , a malcontent drifter and former convict. He initially escaped authorities but was apprehended after a two-month international manhunt. In 1969, Ray pleaded guilty to assassinating King and was sentenced to 99 years in prison.

The identity of King’s assassin has been the source of some controversy. Ray recanted his confession shortly after he was sentenced, and King’s son Dexter publicly defended Ray’s innocence after meeting with the convicted gunman in 1997. Another complicating factor is the 1993 confession of tavern owner Loyd Jowers, who said he contracted a different hit man to kill King. In June 2000, the U.S. Justice Department released a report that dismissed the alternative theories of King’s death. Ray died in prison on April 23, 1998.

King’s life had a seismic impact on race relations in the United States. Years after his death, he is the most widely known Black leader of his era.

His life and work have been honored with a national holiday, schools and public buildings named after him, and a memorial on Independence Mall in Washington, D.C.

Over the years, extensive archival studies have led to a more balanced and comprehensive assessment of his life, portraying him as a complex figure: flawed, fallible, and limited in his control over the mass movements with which he was associated, yet a visionary leader who was deeply committed to achieving social justice through nonviolent means.

• But we come here tonight to be saved from that patience that makes us patient with anything less than freedom and justice.
• There comes a time when the cup of endurance runs over and men are no longer willing to be plunged into an abyss of injustice where they experience the bleakness of corroding despair.
• Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
• The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.
• Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.
• Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.
• The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. The true neighbor will risk his position, his prestige, and even his life for the welfare of others.
• We must all learn to live together as brothers, or we will all perish together as fools.
• Forgiveness is not an occasional act; it is a permanent attitude.
• I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.
• The function of education, therefore, is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society. The most dangerous criminal may be the man gifted with reason but with no morals.
• I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight that we, as a people, will get to the promised land.
• Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice. Justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.
• A man who won’t die for something is not fit to live.
• At the center of non-violence stands the principle of love.
• Right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil triumphant.
• In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
• Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
• Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.

Fact Check: We strive for accuracy and fairness. If you see something that doesn’t look right, contact us !

The Biography.com staff is a team of people-obsessed and news-hungry editors with decades of collective experience. We have worked as daily newspaper reporters, major national magazine editors, and as editors-in-chief of regional media publications. Among our ranks are book authors and award-winning journalists. Our staff also works with freelance writers, researchers, and other contributors to produce the smart, compelling profiles and articles you see on our site. To meet the team, visit our About Us page: https://www.biography.com/about/a43602329/about-us

Civil Rights Activists

30 Civil Rights Leaders of the Past and Present

Benjamin Banneker

Marcus Garvey

Madam C.J. Walker

Maya Angelou

17 Inspiring Martin Luther King Quotes

Bayard Rustin

Colin Kaepernick

W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington’s Clash

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples History American History

Martin Luther King: Exploring His Leadership Style and Societal Role

Leadership Style

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• Roaring Twenties
• Nuclear Age
• Monroe Doctrine
• World History
• Alexander Hamilton

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

More From Forbes

Five leadership lessons from dr. martin luther king jr..

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

Today would have been Martin Luther King Jr.'s 90th birthday, and his legacy of service, sacrifice, commitment and faith is upheld as one of the foremost examples of courageous, moral leadership around the globe. His selfless, unwavering dedication to the struggle for civil rights inspires us to have courage, spread truth, create good trouble and to be optimistic that circumstances, people and countries can change for the better. Here are five lessons we can learn from Dr. King's example:

Summon Your Courage  

King took up the mantle to lead the civil rights movement knowing it would be met with violence and resistance. Nothing King undertook was easy, and he was confronted with every obstacle imaginable. But his deeply rooted belief that the cause was more important than the dangers and obstacles he faced fueled his courage to lead the movement.

Tell The "Unarmed Truth"

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964, King said he grappled with how he could accept the prize on behalf of a movement that was still engaged in an unrelenting struggle, a struggle that had not won the peace that was the essence of the prize. But he came to the conclusion that the award was for the nonviolent response to harrowing violence and oppression, and said "I accept this award  today with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind...I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in reality." King deeply believed that shining a light on the discrimination and the oppression African Americans suffered by leading nonviolent protests would bring to meaningful, lasting change, and it did. King was right- the truth had the last word. 

Get Comfortable With Discomfort 

Representative John Lewis, the Congressman from Georgia and the former chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, wrote a tribute to Dr. King for TIME, and wrote about how Dr. King encouraged them to make what Lewis calls "good trouble" by challenging the injustices they encountered. It contradicted what Lewis' parents and grandparents told him, which was to keep quiet and "Don't get in trouble. This is the way it is." It was an incredibly dangerous time to be a vocal civil rights advocate. It takes a lot of courage to be comfortable with the tension, discomfort, anger and violence that comes with change, but staying comfortable never leads to meaningful progress. " I tell friends and family, colleagues and especially young people that when you see something that’s not right or fair, you have to do something, you have to speak up, you have to get in the way...Dr. King and others inspired me to get in what I call good trouble, necessary trouble. And I think we’re going to have generations for years to come that will be prepared to get in trouble, good trouble, necessary trouble," he wrote. 

Be Optimistic 

In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, King explained that the foundation of the civil rights movement, and his personal commitment to it was grounded in optimism. "I accept this award today with an abiding faith in America and an audacious faith in the future of mankind...I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality," he said. 

Lead With Character 

The Harvard Business Review interviewed Bill George, a fellow at Harvard Business School and expert in leadership about Dr. King. When HBR asked him, 'What are the most applicable lessons to leaders today?' Part of his response was to value the process, value how things are done as much as the results you aim to achieve. "In a very real sense, the character you demonstrate in achieving your purpose is the legacy you leave to those leaders coming along behind you," he said. 

• Editorial Standards
• Reprints & Permissions

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Martin Luther King — Martin Luther King Jr.: Leadership Characteristics and Legacy

Martin Luther King Jr.: Leadership Characteristics and Legacy

• Categories: Leadership Martin Luther King World History

About this sample

Words: 2628 |

14 min read

Published: Mar 18, 2021

Words: 2628 | Pages: 6 | 14 min read

• Emanuel, R. (2018). Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. , ' How Long? Not Long' (23 March 1965). Voices of Democracy. . Retrieved From: https://eds-a-ebscohost-com. ezproxy. myucwest. ca/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=be2b340f-77aa-409b-a127-868113a5363b%40sessionmgr4009
• Whitaker, R. (2018). Martin Luther King Jr. and Mormonism: Dialogue, Race, and Pluralism.
• Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought: Retrieved From https://eds-a-ebscohost-com. ezproxy. myucwest. ca/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=f4456808-9dc6-48c8-a057-a62accfbfa11%40sessionmgr4009.
• Smit, J, M. (2018). Martin Luther King Jr. , W. E. B. Du Bois, and Attitudes Toward Change. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric. Retrieved from: https://eds-a-ebscohost-com. ezproxy. myucwest. ca/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=59ac65a6-e9b6-43a1-8575-472b6cbc3ede%40sdc-v-sessmgr05.
• Allen, J. (2013). Obama and King: Politico. Retrieved From: https://www. politico. com/story/2013/08/barack-obama-and-martin-luther-king-jr-095866Nguyen,
• T. (2019). King's Other Legacy. TIME Magazine. Retrieved From: https://eds-a-ebscohost-com. ezproxy. myucwest. ca/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=a1eb2675-aceb-4d7b-85c9-315b245607bd%40sdc-v-sessmgr03
• Vischer, R, K. (2012). Martin Luther King Jr. and the Morality of Legal Practice: Lessons in Love and Justice. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from: https://eds-a-ebscohost-com. ezproxy. myucwest. ca/eds/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzUwODMyOV9fQU41?sid=0d25ed10-d428-4977-8cc9-b9fb02637c78@sdc-v-sessmgr05&vid=1&format=EB

Should follow an “upside down” triangle format, meaning, the writer should start off broad and introduce the text and author or topic being discussed, and then get more specific to the thesis statement.

Provides a foundational overview, outlining the historical context and introducing key information that will be further explored in the essay, setting the stage for the argument to follow.

Cornerstone of the essay, presenting the central argument that will be elaborated upon and supported with evidence and analysis throughout the rest of the paper.

The topic sentence serves as the main point or focus of a paragraph in an essay, summarizing the key idea that will be discussed in that paragraph.

The body of each paragraph builds an argument in support of the topic sentence, citing information from sources as evidence.

After each piece of evidence is provided, the author should explain HOW and WHY the evidence supports the claim.

Should follow a right side up triangle format, meaning, specifics should be mentioned first such as restating the thesis, and then get more broad about the topic at hand. Lastly, leave the reader with something to think about and ponder once they are done reading.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Business Social Issues History

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 709 words

2 pages / 687 words

1 pages / 681 words

4 pages / 1749 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Martin Luther King

In conclusion, the use of biblical allusions in Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech exemplifies the power of language and symbolism to inspire social change and progress. By drawing on the moral authority and [...]

In his iconic "I Have a Dream" speech, delivered on August 28, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C., Martin Luther King Jr. utilized various literary devices to effectively convey his message of equality and justice [...]

On August 28, 1963, at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his iconic speech, "I Have a Dream." The speech has since become one of the most famous and influential speeches in American [...]

The speech, "I Have a Dream," delivered by Martin Luther King Jr. on August 28, 1963, is a landmark address in American history. King gave this speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington D.C. during the March on Washington for [...]

Martin Luther King Jr. was a prominent leader in the American civil rights movement, known for his powerful speeches and unwavering dedication to nonviolent protest. He possessed a unique set of characteristics that set him [...]

In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. he explains the injustices happening all over the United States but especially in the city of Birmingham. King and his followers are preparing for direct [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

FIQWS 10108 Portfolio

Raimely flores' final portfolio.

• Summary & Response Essay
• Exploratory Essay
• Critical Analysis Research Essay

The Analysis of the Effectiveness of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Leadership

       Racism has been a large part of the United States of America’s history. This oppression began with the enslavement of Africans and African-Americans, which did not relent despite their emancipation. This is where the false complex of African-Americans being inferior to white people rooted in the United States. Over 300 years of systematic oppression occurred before the Civil Rights Movement took place. This movement was where Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was able to make his imprint on American history. The Atlanta native, with his supporters and members of his church, were able to help change the laws that infringed on African Americans’ rights. One of the legislation acts that they were able to influence was the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, which rallied hundreds of thousands of people, was one of the key factors to the act being passed. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. helped in organizing the event and played a key role. King’s life is depicted in his biography by Anna Revell in “Dare to Dream” which follows his childhood, through his rise in popularity and his contribution to the Civil Rights Movement, until his untimely death. James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner’s publication of “The Truth about Leadership” details different “truths”, or the vital attributes, one must possess and accept to be an effective leader. Lastly, in the eighth edition of “Leadership: Theory and Practice” by Peter Guy Northouse, describes different leadership styles, some of which Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.  Some of his attributes that let him become such an effective leader were that he was a transformational and team leader. These leadership skills were characterized by King Jr.’s charisma and his ability to be interdependent on other leaders. He also lived by the leadership truths of being driven by commitment and having challenges be the crucible for greatness. His values and grit demonstrated how persistent he was while challenging oppression. The skills King Jr. possessed allowed for him to bring about many positive changes to society, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s transformational skills were part of the reason why the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. According to Northouse on page 161, transformational leadership is the “process of engaging with others to create a connection that increases motivation and morality in both the leader and the follower.” This unique connection is partly made through the charisma that the leader should possess and the leader’s understanding of their followers’ needs (Northouse 164). Being an African-American himself, he perfectly understood his followers’ needs since he had experienced them first-hand. Revell states on page 22 that King experienced his father having to stand up for a white man on the bus, an incident that particularly resonated with him and shaped his conscience after his father had said he would comply with Jim Crow laws, but would never accept it. Another incident, one that was more personal, was when he made a white friend whose father made him unfriend King because of his color. This particular incident inspired parts his speech, “I Have a Dream” (Revell 22). King was very charismatic. His charisma can be observed during his “I Have a Dream” speech, which was analyzed by Robert Redziniak, a Psychology professor at Pennsylvania State University, in “The Transformational Leader – Martin Luther King Jr.”. This speech called on the people at the march and any who listened, to reflect on America’s society at the time, as well as the history, current treatment of African-Americans, and his hopes for the future (Revell 81). Part of charismatic leadership is the expression of high expectations set for the follower (Northouse). This is no better quote where this is emphasized in King’s speech besides where he states “let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred” (Redziniak). This communicates King’s expectations for those participating in the movement to not use violence to resolve conflict or to fight for their freedom. However, without mention, he emphasizes one of his main principles and ways of combating oppression, through nonviolence. It takes a lot for a person to hold back their anger, especially what the people of the movement have put up with. They have been beaten up, hosed, threatened with police dogs, thrown into overcrowded jail cells, yet they still do not succumb to their anger. This ignoring of temptation is what King sets the bar for. The march and speech’s meaning had the ability to form a connection with its listeners and it swayed the hearts of those in congress. This led to the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrated team leadership when he and other leaders came together to organize the march. Characteristic of team leadership is a “group of organizational members who are interdependent, share common goals, and coordinate activities to accomplish those goals” (Northouse 363). Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a prominent figure in the movement, but it did not mean he was the only one. According to the National Museum of American History, there were five other leaders of major civil rights activist groups. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., A. Phillip Randolph, James Farmer, John Lewis, Roy Wilkins, Whitney Young were the six key figures of the Civil Rights Movement, otherwise known as the “Big Six” (Revell 70). A. Phillip Randolph was the leader of the Negro American Labor Center, James Farmer was of the Congress of Racial Equality, John Lewis was of the Student Nonviolence Coordinating Committee, Roy Wilkins was the leader of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and Whitney Young was part of the National Urban League. With King being of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the support they rallied was many and they had many helping hands to also assist with the organizing of the event, presented by the National Museum of American History in “Leaders of the March”. These leaders were interdependent on each other because without their union, they could not rally much support. These leaders had different priorities, yet were able to come together for the march. This union had proven to be effective and important because they had managed to gather more than 200,000 people by the end of it (Revell 70 and 91-92). Not only this, but they believed that by coming together, “their show of cooperation would be enough to make the difference they sought” (Revell 70). Their goals for the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom were the same. They agreed on the following goals, which are some of the many they had drafted: end to school segregation, meaningful civil rights acts, federal law against discrimination while hiring, and a fixed hourly pay rate (Revell 73-75). Their drafting of goals proved how goal focused they were, especially by gaining agreement on the matter. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 would not have been passed without the event of the March on Washington, nor King’s leadership. King directly provoked, then president, John F. Kennedy into clearly voicing his support for African Americans after saying Kennedy’s views of the movement was “tokenism” (Revell 68). This provokation of his character began the planning for the March. King made sure that Kennedy would provide security for the marchers and that he would keep his word (Revell 78).

In addition to the two leadership categories that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. fell under, he also possessed a few “truths” to leadership. Kouzes and Posner present evidence-based ways that leaders have been able to become effective leaders. They call each of these ways “truths”. His third truth is titled “value drives commitment”. Essentially what Kouzes and Posner mean by this truth is that followers need to know what your values and morals are in order to stand by you. Not only this, but one must also demonstrate that one truthfully stand by these values because if one doesn’t, they will not be able to fully commit to the cause they are fighting for (29-43). One of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s biggest morals was about not using violence. He wanted to model after Mohandas Gandhi (Revell 10). King was able to communicate to his followers that he did not approve of violence as a solution. He believed that any kind of solution would be brought about by touching the hearts and changing the minds of those who opposed the movement. King was able to show his followers that he meant what he said, a well known example of his demonstrations would be the Montgomery bus boycott. After Rosa Parks was arrested, instead of rioting, or vandalizing these buses, the boycotters simply refrained from using buses. The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom was an excellent example of his followers’ understanding of his values and showing their commitment to it as well. With more than 200,000 people attending, at no point had the march become violent. With such a large amount of people attending, it was increasingly easier for things to rapidly turn chaotic. The march was intended to be peaceful, and it stayed this way as well (Revell 80).

The seventh truth, “challenge is the crucible for greatness”, is the focus for the entire movement. This truth essentially states that a leader must face hardships. Nothing comes without challenge, but one must learn and evolve from them in order to become successful. These obstacles tests our commitment and allow for people to become more resistant to opposition and other challenges (Kouzes and Posner (91-104). Bull Connor was one of the many hardships that King faced. Bull Connor was a racist politician. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s protestors focused their efforts on Birmingham, where Connor was based. Most of these protestors were students. However, without regard, Connor retaliated by spraying protestors with fire hoses and police dogs (Revell 53). Thousands of protestors were arrested, but it did not deter them, it only encouraged them more to fight for the cause. They were able to become more resistant to those trying to oppose their natural rights. Their resilience had proven to lead to their success because the brutal tactics used on the protestors had led to more attention being shed on the Civil Rights Movement. The challenge of the march was their uncertainty. The team’s uncertainty of whether people would show up to join their cause, if it’ll be peaceful, if President Kennedy would really protect them. Their biggest uncertainty was what would occur. However, the march was a success. President Kennedy delivered on his promise and gathered 600 men for security, who weren’t used since the march was peaceful, another one of their concerns (Revell 62). The men accounted for 100,000 people going, however, they did not expect the 200,000 that would show up to show their support (Revell 80). These challenges and truths were crucial for the success of the march. With their persistence and commitment to their values, they made a strong body which could not be ignored. This prompted for change. As a result, Congress voted to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a very prominent figure during the Civil Rights Movement. His leadership, values, and persistence contributed largely to his success and the success of the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a transformational leader, his charisma and ability to sway the minds of those he encountered helped him gain the support he needed. As a team leader, he and his team, the “Big Six”, were able to organize and execute a successful march which prompted for a lasting impact on history, the passing of meaningful civil rights legislation. King’s values, morals, and his commitment to them allowed for him to become an effective leader. His plea for not using violence to resolve tensions or conflict gave respect to his cause. His persistence in having the movement be successful and prompting for change has been the pushing factor for his leadership. Lessons that can be learned from King’s leadership is that there are other forms of communicating your demands and pleas for change, other than violence. He also asks us to not be prejudice based on the color of one’s skin. In following these lessons, our world would be more united.

Works Cited

Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner. The Truth about Leadership: the No-Fads, Heart-of-the-Matter Facts You Need to Know . Jossey-Bass, 2010. Print.

“Leaders of the March.” National Museum of American History , 26 Aug. 2013, https://americanhistory.si.edu/changing-america-emancipation-proclamation-1863-and-march-washington-1963/1963/leaders-march . 29 Oct. 2019.

Northouse, Peter Guy. Leadership: Theory and Practice . 8th ed., SAGE Publications, 2010. Online.

Redziniak, Robert. “The Transformational Leader – Martin Luther King Jr.” PSY 532 Foundations of Leadership Clarke , 5 June 2016, https://sites.psu.edu/leaderfoundationsclarke/2016/06/05/the-transformational-leader-martin-luther-king-jr/ . 29 Oct, 2019.

Revell, Anna. Martin Luther King Jr.: Dare to Dream: The True Story of a Civil Rights Icon . Publisher Not Identified, 2017. Print.

This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.

Need help with the Commons?

Email us at [email protected] so we can respond to your questions and requests. Please email from your CUNY email address if possible. Or visit our help site for more information:

• Terms of Service
• Accessibility
• Creative Commons (CC) license unless otherwise noted

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

• Martin Luther King Jr.’s Legacy 60 Years After the March on Washington

1. How Americans see the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr.

Table of contents.

• King’s impact on the country
• King’s impact on personal views on racial equality
• Familiarity with King’s ‘I Have a Dream’ speech
• The country’s progress on racial equality in the last 60 years
• Efforts to ensure equal rights for all, regardless of race or ethnicity
• The future of racial equality
• 3. Achieving racial equality
• Acknowledgments
• The American Trends Panel survey methodology

Most U.S. adults (81%) say Martin Luther King Jr. has had a positive impact on the country, with 47% saying King has had a very positive impact. Some 38% say their own views on racial equality have been influenced by King’s legacy a great deal or a fair amount.

By race and ethnicity

Some 53% of Black adults say Martin Luther King Jr. has had a very positive impact on the country, compared with 46% each among White and Hispanic adults and 43% of Asian adults.

Asian (10%), White (6%) and Hispanic (6%) adults are all more likely than Black adults (2%) to say they don’t know enough about King’s impact to answer.

Adults younger than 50 are more likely than those who are older to say King has had a very positive impact on the country. This overall variance is mostly due to the differing views of older and younger White Americans.

Some 54% of White Americans younger than 50 say King’s impact has been very positive, compared with 40% of White Americans ages 50 and older. The opposite is true among Black Americans: 60% of those 50 and older say King has had a very positive impact, compared with 49% of Black Americans younger than 50.

There are no differences by age among Hispanic Americans, and the sample of Asian Americans is too small to analyze by age group.

By partisanship

A majority of Democrats and Democratic leaners (58%) say King has had a very positive impact on the country, compared with 37% of Republicans and those who lean to the GOP.

Ideological differences among Democrats

Liberal Democrats (68%) are far more likely than moderate and conservative Democrats (50%) to say King has had a very positive impact on the country.

There is no difference on this question between conservative Republicans and moderate and liberal Republicans.

A majority of Black Americans (59%) say Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy has influenced their own views on racial equality a great deal or a fair amount. Far smaller shares of Hispanic (38%), White (34%) and Asian (34%) Americans say the same.

About one-in-five Asian adults (21%) say they don’t know enough about King’s legacy to say how it’s impacted their own views. This is larger than the shares of Hispanic (11%), White (9%) and Black (6%) adults who say they don’t know enough to answer.

About half of Democrats (48%) say King’s legacy has influenced their own views on racial equality a great deal or a fair amount; 29% say King’s legacy has influenced their views some; and 16% say it hasn’t influenced their views much or at all.

Republicans are more mixed: 30% say King’s legacy has influenced their own views on racial equality a great deal or a fair amount; 28% say it has influenced their views some; and 30% say it hasn’t had much influence or hasn’t influenced their views at all.

Racial and ethnic differences among Democrats

A majority of Black Democrats (63%) say King’s legacy has had a great deal or a fair amount of influence on their views on racial equality. Far smaller shares of White (46%), Hispanic (41%) and Asian (40%) Democrats say the same.

In their own words: What Americans say about Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy

(Selected written responses to an open-ended question)

“He wanted equality for all people, not just for blacks. He wanted all poor people to have a better life in this country. He was against the war in Vietnam. He fought for voters’ rights. He loved all people in this country.” – Black Democrat

“At the time he was a radical, hated by a majority of white folks. He advocated for equality not just in racial acceptance but by changing the economic system to lift up the poor.” – White Democrat

“MLK, Jr. pushed for equality among all people, regardless of skin color, not because of skin color. He did not intend for the outcome of his fight to be an emphasis on race, as we are seeing today, but rather, he sought a world in which race is irrelevant.” – White Republican

“MLK Jr was remembered for civil disobedience and peaceful protests, but people often forget he was a radical and was not some quiet pastor. He was a man of the people and he was killed for advocating for human rights.” – Asian Democrat

“He didn’t only want equality for black people; he advocated for all. He also didn’t tear down white people to make his point; he knew and said that it took their involvement for change as well.” – Black Republican

“MLK believed in a meritocracy rather than affirmative action, or worse, reparations.” – White Republican

“The popular conception of MLK was that he was someone who cared solely about racial equality. In fact, King viewed economic injustice and racial injustice as interlinked and inseparable. King supported radical redistribution of wealth, strengthening the safety net and, yes, reparations for black Americans.” – White Democrat

“His legacy, which was far more radical in his day than is recognized now, has largely been whitewashed to one carrying a ‘love everyone but don’t change anything systemic’ message. His views on economic equality, the ones he espoused shortly before his death, are still radical today.” – Black Democrat

“He believed true equality is colorblind and that the goal is equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. He would very much disagree with the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement. He believed ALL LIVES MATTER, and that it is not racist to say so.” – White Republican

“He tried to get both black and white people (and other colors) to get along because we’re not different races, rather one race, the Human Race. Sadly, I think only some people understand that and live it, others try to use race as a tool to divide us.” – Hispanic Republican

“I think about how much he’s been whitewashed and how many people quoting him today would have hated him back then. I think of how he wanted equality for all, most notably for Black people, but also for all marginalized people.” – White Democrat

“When I think of what MLK taught, the first things that come to mind are ideas rooted in finding commonality in each other, uniting people on the principle of being equal, and fostering mutual respect and appreciation for one another.” – White Republican

Most U.S. adults (60%) say they have heard or read a great deal or a fair amount about Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech . About a quarter (27%) have heard or read some, and 13% haven’t heard or read much or anything at all about the speech.

Eight-in-ten Black adults say they’ve heard or read a great deal or a fair amount about the speech, followed by 60% of White adults, 49% of Hispanic adults and 41% of Asian adults.

About a quarter of Asian (25%) and Hispanic (23%) adults say they haven’t heard much or anything at all about King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

Adults ages 65 and older – all of whom were at least 5 years old when King gave the speech in 1963 – are the most likely to say they’ve heard or read a great deal or a fair amount about it: 68% say this, compared with shares ranging from 53% to 61% among younger groups.

By education

About two-thirds (66%) of adults with a bachelor’s degree or more education say they’ve heard or read a great deal or a fair amount about the speech. Smaller shares of those with some college (61%) or with a high school diploma or less education (53%) say the same.

Differences by education are evident among White and Hispanic adults, but not among Black adults. Eight-in-ten Black Americans with at least a bachelor’s degree say they’ve heard or read a great deal or a fair amount about the speech, as do 83% of those with some college and 77% of Black Americans with a high school diploma or less education. There aren’t enough Asian adults in the sample to analyze by education.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

• Black Americans
• Discrimination & Prejudice
• Partisanship & Issues
• Racial Bias & Discrimination

A look at Black-owned businesses in the U.S.

8 facts about black americans and the news, black americans’ views on success in the u.s., among black adults, those with higher incomes are most likely to say they are happy, fewer than half of black americans say the news often covers the issues that are important to them, most popular, report materials.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Age & Generations
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Economy & Work
• Family & Relationships
• Gender & LGBTQ
• Immigration & Migration
• International Affairs
• Internet & Technology
• Methodological Research
• News Habits & Media
• Non-U.S. Governments
• Other Topics
• Politics & Policy
• Race & Ethnicity
• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

Martin Luther King the Purpose of Education

This essay about Martin Luther King Jr.’s views on education highlights his belief in learning as a tool for enlightenment, empowerment, and societal change. It outlines his core ideas that education should foster individual and collective freedom, moral integrity, and social justice. The text references his writings, including “The Purpose of Education” and “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” to discuss how education can unify diverse groups and inspire personal and societal growth, aiming to create a just and compassionate world.

How it works

Exploring Martin Luther King Jr.’s profound reflections on education, we are invited to embark on a unique journey illuminated by the insights of a pivotal leader whose thoughts reverberate through time with lasting relevance and urgency. King’s perspective on education exceeds traditional academic dialogues, providing a deep vision that touches the core of human respect and societal advancement.

King perceived education not just as a means for disseminating knowledge or acquiring skills, but as a powerful force for enlightenment, empowerment, and social transformation.

His pivotal essay, “The Purpose of Education,” acts as a beacon that lights the way toward a more enlightened and fair society.

At the heart of King’s educational philosophy was the conviction that learning should promote both individual and collective freedom, enabling people to tap into their intrinsic abilities and contribute significantly to human progress. He stressed the cultivation of not only intellectual capabilities but also moral values, compassion, and civic duty—attributes crucial for handling the complex realities of life with honor and sensitivity.

A central element of King’s educational theory was the demand for social justice. He argued that knowledge without purpose is meaningless, and true education equips individuals with the resources and resolve needed to challenge inequity and break down systemic barriers. In his iconic “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King profoundly linked all of humanity, proclaiming that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Furthermore, King saw education as a powerful tool to promote unity and solidarity among diverse groups. He dreamed of a world where people of all ethnicities, religions, and backgrounds could unite in mutual respect and collaboration, overcoming the entrenched divides that had long separated them. King’s ideal of the “beloved community”—a peaceful and inclusive society bonded by empathy and shared goals—remains a powerful illustration of the transformative power of education.

King also viewed education as a personal odyssey of exploration and development. He believed everyone has unique gifts and potentials that education can develop and refine. By encouraging learners to pursue their interests, develop their skills, and embrace their identities, King aimed to inspire them to be catalysts of positive change in their own lives and in their communities.

Reflecting on King’s insightful contributions to the meaning of education, we recognize the enduring impact of knowledge, empathy, and unity in driving individual and societal change. In a time of significant global and existential challenges, King’s ideals guide us, urging us to rededicate ourselves to pursuing justice, equality, and dignity. Education offers us a chance to honor King’s legacy and collectively work toward a more equitable, just, and compassionate world for future generations.

Cite this page

Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education. (2024, Apr 29). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/

"Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education." PapersOwl.com , 29 Apr 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/ [Accessed: 2 May. 2024]

"Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education." PapersOwl.com, Apr 29, 2024. Accessed May 2, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/

"Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education," PapersOwl.com , 29-Apr-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/. [Accessed: 2-May-2024]

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Martin Luther King The Purpose Of Education . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/martin-luther-king-the-purpose-of-education/ [Accessed: 2-May-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader Essay

Leadership style, works cited.

Martin Luther King Jr. is seen today as an example of an exceptional, “born” leader who understood his vision and mission perfectly, and who was able to reach out to others to work on a common goal or mission. One of the King’s important traits was his ability to listen to and understand different points of view. Furthermore, he did not only understand those but was also able to motivate people with different agendas to work on the same goal (Ling 148). Today, he is perceived as one of the greatest leaders in American history who genuinely cared about his followers and their future.

Martin Luther King was an emergent leader; he was not successful at first and experienced different failures during his way to becoming a great leader. He was criticized by activists of different races, and during the 1960s, when the action was supported eagerly by students, King was perceived as too hesitant by some (Ling 67). However, his experience in historical events, including boycotts, and active involvement in the Civil Rights Movement allowed him to polish his leadership skills and strengthen followers’ support and his position in it. King was a trait leader, as he was able to translate his vision or his dream to others and make them enthusiastic about it. For example, during his preparation of the Poor People’s Campaign, King directly addressed all dangers that his group would face (including incarceration or scorn) but insisted that they would accept it because “that is what America’s poor now receive” (Jones 340). Although the fear was tremendous during the campaign, King’s followers not only supported him but actively followed his instructions and did not abandon the goal despite possible consequences.

King had expert and referent power; he was admired and appreciated by activists, but his understanding of the situation rooted in his university study of theology, his personal experience, and his relationships with authorities (i.e., he was arrested many times and spied on by the FBI). Although he is often praised for his nonviolent approach toward activism (and rightly so), it is important to remember that he was a fierce and powerful activist. Some researchers assume that Martin Luther King Jr. was a transformational leader: a leader who can share their vision of the future and motivate followers to strive for it, inspiring them to contribute to the process of goal achievement (Carton et al. 1546). As we know, King was an expert in picturing goals (for example, via his speeches, especially “I Have a Dream”). Thus, King used approaches of a leadership style that was not defined in detail during the 1960s but actively used in the Civil Rights Movement. In a way, it is possible to say that King was a pioneer in transformational leadership, as he used it actively before managers understood how effective it could be.

Martin Luther King was a trait leader with expert and referent power, whose ability to inspire people and share a common goal among thousands of followers helped him significantly influence the USA and the rest of the world. His decision to build his leadership on nonviolence and Christian beliefs helped him utilize a unique leadership style that transformed the Civil Rights Movement. Although King was not an assigned leader, he became an admired icon of a movement by fighting for what he believed to be right.

Carton, Andrew M., et al. “A (Blurry) Vision of the Future: How Leader Rhetoric about Ultimate Goals Influences Performance.” Academy of Management Journal , vol. 57, no. 6, 2014, pp. 1544-1570.

Jones, Trina. “Occupying America: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the American Dream, and the Challenge of Socio-Economic Inequality.” Vill. L. Rev, vol. 57, no. 2, 2012, pp. 339-356.

Ling, Peter J. Martin Luther King, Jr . Routledge, 2015.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, February 29). Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader. https://ivypanda.com/essays/martin-luther-king-jr-as-a-born-leader/

"Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader." IvyPanda , 29 Feb. 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/martin-luther-king-jr-as-a-born-leader/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader'. 29 February.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/martin-luther-king-jr-as-a-born-leader/.

1. IvyPanda . "Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/martin-luther-king-jr-as-a-born-leader/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Martin Luther King Jr. as a Born Leader." February 29, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/martin-luther-king-jr-as-a-born-leader/.

• Martin Luther King Jr. as an Equality Activist
• Making Money on Music: The Company That Has to Stay Afloat
• The Gifted Hands: The Ben Carson Story Film
• Referent Power: Examples
• Consumer's Referent-Seeking Behaviour: The Antecedence and Motivational Factors
• Martin Luther King Jr.’s and Malcolm X’s Leadership Styles
• Martin Luther’s Religious and Political Views
• Martin Luther's Effects on the Protestant Reformation
• Martin Luther King's Leadership in Historical Context
• Martin Luther King and Winston Churchill’s Leadership Styles
• Cesar Chavez as a Leader and Change Agent
• African Americans in Du Bois' vs. Washington's Views
• Sociopolitical Change in South Africa and the US
• Medgar Wiley Evers in the Civil Rights Movement
• Social Reaction to the Rights Movements in the US

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Biden is the graduation speaker for Martin Luther King’s alma mater. It’s a moral disaster

The US president continues to support Israel in its onslaught on Gaza. Morehouse College’s most famous alumnus was anti-war

M orehouse College is a special place. The only all-male historically Black college in the world, it has alumni ranging from Dr Martin Luther King Jr, the most celebrated anti-war civil rights leader in history, to Theodore “Ted” Colbert III, the CEO of Boeing’s defense, space and security division, a key player in supplying the weapons technologies for Israel’s months-long campaign of military vengeance on Palestinians.

While there is much diversity among the ranks of this brotherhood, Morehouse – also my alma mater – places a primacy on moral leadership and service, and Dr King has been a critical avatar in these efforts. There is a prominent statue of him on campus, his likeness is depicted as a silhouette on official college brochures, the chapel on campus is named in his honor. His papers are held nearby at the Robert W Woodruff Library. Considering King’s anti-militarism, and the college’s embrace of him as a beacon on campus, the decision to invite Joe Biden to give Morehouse’s commencement speech to this year’s graduating class is a moral disaster. The US president’s staunch support of Israel in the face of its unrelenting assault on Palestinians in the Israel-Gaza war has sparked sustained protests throughout the country, most recently on multiple college campuses. And though some have tried to take King’s defense of Israel’s right to exist as evidence that he would affirm without qualification Israel’s present military campaign, his broader anti-militarism cannot be conveniently pushed aside, nor can his stated desire for a peaceful resolution in the region.

Israeli defense forces have killed more than 30,000 Palestinians since 7 October, more than 72,000 have been injured, and more than 1 million have been displaced and are vulnerable to hunger and disease. Meanwhile, US officials continue to say there is “no evidence” of genocide, even as experts say otherwise. For Biden’s part, he has not indicated that the US will stop sending weapons to Israel; and he has continued to direct his representatives at the UN to either abstain or vote against any ceasefire resolution brought before them.

This all reveals a striking distance between the Dr King who opposed war and violence and the imaginary Dr King who Morehouse’s president, David A Thomas, has conjured up. In an email to students, faculty and alumni announcing Biden’s acceptance of the speaking invitation, Thomas wrote: “drawing inspiration from Dr King’s vision of the Beloved Community, we recognize that personal, community, and international conflicts are inescapable. However, it is our moral duty to resolve these conflicts peacefully and to reconcile through an inclusive, joint commitment to goodwill and allyship.” Thomas might want to communicate this to Biden.

Biden’s refusal to halt military aid to Israel or to call for an immediate and lasting ceasefire has resulted in an electoral censure . Led by Arab Americans, thousands of Democratic primary voters across several states are selecting “uncommitted” on their ballots in protest. The president struggles with most of his key constituencies, most notably Black voters. It is likely that anxieties about the declining support among young Black voters weighed on Biden’s decision to accept the Morehouse invitation some seven months after it was extended. He seems to want to appeal to them for political support without boldly addressing the issues that routinely come up for them, such as crippling student debt and higher costs of living.

Meanwhile, students in the Atlanta University Center Consortium (AUCC) – a group of historically Black institutions including Clark Atlanta University, Spelman College, Morehouse College and Morehouse School of Medicine – have been unequivocal in calling out their administrations’ ties to companies doing business with Israel. Coalitions such as the Student Intercommunal Coordinating Committee have also connected the issue of Palestine to the Stop Cop City movement, which aims to prevent the construction of a law enforcement training center in Atlanta. For their efforts, they have faced harassment, intimidation and the possibility of arrest. (More than 300 AUCC alumni have signed a letter urging the administrations to support students’ right to organize and protest on campus.)

A small but intrepid group called Faculty for Justice in Palestine – Georgia has joined students in calling AUCC administrations to account. In a recent statement calling on Morehouse leadership to rescind its invitation to Biden, group leaders wrote, “any college or university that gives its commencement stage to President Biden in this moment is endorsing genocide.” (Biden is also delivering the commencement address at West Point.)

Students around the country, including many in the AUCC, are standing in the tradition of Dr King. They do so in the context of a broader movement and crackdown – the most intense this country has seen since 1968. Biden has smeared these students – the very people he needs to secure his electoral prospects – as “antisemitic” and uninformed. College and university administrations set riot police upon them and threaten them with disciplinary action.

At precisely the moment when students all over the country are showing us the meaning of courage, Morehouse’s invitation to the president shows profound cowardice. The moral leaders in this moment have been clear all along. We should join them.

Jared Loggins is a professor of Black studies and political science at Amherst College.

• US universities
• Israel-Gaza war

Most viewed

The Daily Northwestern

Sign up to receive our email newsletter in your inbox.

Panelists talk legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in ‘The Civil Rights Act at 60’

About 100 Evanston-area residents attended a panel titled “The Civil Rights Act at 60: Is Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Dream for Chicago and the Country Attainable?” at Evanston Township High School Monday night. 

The panel — which was presented by the Family Action Network and the Stanford Institute for Advancing Just Societies — featured Vaughn Bryant, executive director of Metropolitan Peace Initiatives, and Lerone Martin, director of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute at Stanford University. The event was moderated by journalist and author Natalie Moore.

The talk focused on King’s legacy and the importance of organizing in local communities today. Topics discussed included segregation, redlining and redistribution of wealth. 

Martin said people commonly misunderstand King as only being concerned with ending Jim Crow laws when, in actuality, King was interested in eradicating the “triple evils” of racism, poverty and military violence.

“His body of work is so large and encompasses concerns about poverty, economic exploitation, housing, war and police brutality,” Martin said. “What we have in this country, unfortunately, is that King has been anesthetized, or he’s been sanitized, in order to be acceptable to the broader public and to the broader nation.”

In Chicago, King worked against redlining by trying to find places where Black Americans wanted and could afford to live, Martin said.

Martin said King would test for fair housing by sending white and Black people looking to buy homes to the same local real estate agencies. He found that prospective white homeowners were offered housing all across the city, while prospective Black homeowners were only offered housing in the west and south sides of Chicago, Martin said. 

“(King) came up to Chicago and gave a speech in 1963 and said Chicago is as segregated as Farmingdale,” Martin said. “We see the photos and the images of a Birmingham march — children being sprayed with hoses and dogs being bitten. You didn’t see that necessarily within Chicago, but it was still segregated in part because of federal housing policy.”

Martin said that King would spend time in Black neighborhoods as a way to speak with the community. King focused on engaging with people in conversation, particularly young people because they “have opportunity and responsibility to try to create a better world,” Martin said.

Bryant said reaching out to communities and listening to what they have to say is the pinnacle of organizing — even to this day. Lobbying is an important way for people to advocate for what they want and need, he added. 

“It is making sure that the people who are closest to the problem in their local community are coming up with the solutions,” Bryant said. 

Martin said one such problem in need of a solution is wealth inequality — specifically, how racialized the issue is. 

Evanston resident JoAnn Robson, who attended the panel, said she appreciated the speakers highlighting how far society has come for general racial equality, yet there is a saddening lack of progress in closing the wealth distribution gap. 

However, Robson said she remains hopeful that future progress is on its way. 

“I have faith in the young people of today,” Robson said. “I think you’re going to help make the world a better place.”

Email: [email protected]  

Related Stories:

— Nonprofits hold panel discussion to honor Martin Luther King Jr.’s vision for fair housing

— Medill alumnus Jonathan Eig commemorates the life of Martin Luther King Jr. at annual keynote

— YWCA Evanston/North Shore talks solidarity, white supremacy at annual ‘Unite Against Racism’ campaign

• Evanston Township High School
• Family Action Network
• Jr.’s Dream for Chicago and the Country Attainable?
• Lerone Martin
• Martin Luther King Jr.
• Natalie Moore
• Stanford Institute for Advancing Just Societies
• The Civil Rights Act at 60: Is Martin Luther King
• Vaughn Bryant

• Editorial Board
• Former Daily Editors
• Students Publishing Company
• Classifieds
• Today’s Paper
• Print Archives
• Comment policy
• Terms of Use

Ebenezer Baptist Church (Atlanta, Georgia)

January 1, 1886 to December 31, 1886

In the fall of 1947, Martin Luther King delivered his first sermon at the pulpit of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. Ebenezer’s congregation voted to license King as a minister soon afterward, and he was ordained in February 1948. King went on to serve as Ebenezer’s associate minister during his breaks from  Crozer Theological Seminary  and from his doctoral studies at  Boston University  through early 1954. He returned as co-pastor with his father, Martin Luther King, Sr. , serving from 1960 until his  assassination  in 1968.

The church was founded in 1886 by its first minister, John Andrew Parker. In 1894 Adam Daniel  Williams , King, Jr.’s maternal grandfather, became Ebenezer’s second pastor. Under Williams the church grew from 13 members to nearly 750 members by 1913. Williams moved the church twice before purchasing a lot on the corner of Auburn Avenue and Jackson Street and announced plans to raise $25,000 for a new building that would include an auditorium and gallery seating for 1,250 people. In March 1914 the Ebenezer congregation celebrated the groundbreaking for its new building. After the death of Williams in 1931, King, Sr., who had married Williams’ daughter Alberta in 1926, became pastor.

With King, Sr., as pastor and his wife, Alberta Williams King , serving as musical director, the King family spent much of their time at Ebenezer. King, Jr., later described how his earliest relationships were formed at church: “My best friends were in Sunday School, and it was the Sunday School that helped me to build the capacity for getting along with people” ( Papers  1:359 ). While in seminary, King often preached at Ebenezer. He delivered some of his most enduring sermons for the first time at Ebenezer, including “The Dimensions of a Complete Life,” “What Is Man?” and “Loving Your Enemies.”

After King accepted the pastorate at  Dexter Avenue Baptist Church  in Montgomery, members of Ebenezer’s congregation attended his October 1954 installation service, prompting King to express his gratitude: “Your prayers and words of encouragement have meant a great deal to me in my ministry; and you can never know what your presence in such large numbers meant to me at the beginning of my pastorate. I want you to know Ebenezer, that I feel greatly indebted to you; and that whatever success I might achieve in my life’s work you will have helped to make it possible” ( Papers  2:314 ).

In November 1959, King accepted Ebenezer’s call to join his father as co-pastor, a move that brought him closer to the headquarters of the  Southern Christian Leadership Conference . His first sermon as co-pastor at Ebenezer was “The Three Dimensions of a Complete Life.” After King’s assassination in 1968, his brother, A. D. Williams King , was installed as Ebenezer’s co-pastor. King, Sr., continued as pastor until 1975, and Coretta Scott King  continued to attend services at Ebenezer until her death. 

Introduction, in  Papers  1:6–7, 13 ,  25–26, 28 .

King, “An Autobiography of Religious Development,” 12 September 1950–22 November 1950, in  Papers  1:359–363 . 

King to The Ebenezer Baptist Church Members, 6 November 1954, in  Papers  2:313–314 .

King, Sr., with Riley,  Daddy King , 1980. 

Lillian D. Watkins, Certification of Minister’s License for Martin Luther King, Jr., 4 February 1948, in  Papers  1:150 .

Advertisement

Supported by

What Columbia Should Have Learned From the Protests of 1968

Sending in the police to arrest students only inflamed tensions on campus then. Why would this time be different?

• Share full article

By Ginia Bellafante

Ginia Bellafante writes the Big City column, a weekly commentary on the politics, culture and life of New York City.

If Nemat Shafik, the president of Columbia University, has convinced the world of anything during these last several calamitous days, it is almost certainly that there is no position in American executive life as thankless, as depleting or less enviable than running a major academic institution in an age of chronic, reflexive agitation.

Criticized for capitulating to congressional Republicans in a hearing on antisemitism last week, she quickly found she had not been nearly ingratiating enough. On Monday some of those Republicans, joined in their disapproval by a considerable number of Democrats, called for Dr. Shafik to resign amid the “anarchy” stemming from student demonstrations in favor of the Palestinian cause. At the same time, roughly 100 members of the Columbia and Barnard faculties, representing a variety of opinions on the war itself, gathered to condemn her decision to summon the New York Police Department onto campus to arrest students involved in nonviolent protest.

“There is a pretty broad consensus that bringing in the police was precipitous and counterproductive,” Christopher Brown, a history professor who spoke at the rally, told me. “Whatever it was designed to accomplish, it didn’t.” It was as if, he said, university administrators “have never met a 19- or 20-year-old.”

As ever, understanding the past is crucial to making sense of the turmoil we are witnessing now. In the spring of 1968, Columbia’s president, Grayson Kirk, rarely depicted without a pipe, moved in comparatively slow motion in response to unrest that had become an inflection point in the wave of campus activism that was redirecting history. By the end of April, the expressions of rage over Columbia’s ties to the defense industry and thus the American entanglement in Vietnam, as well as its singularly ill-conceived plan to build a private gym on public land in Harlem, had gone way beyond chants and hand-painted signs. Within days, students had occupied five buildings, seized the president’s office and taken Dean Henry Coleman hostage, holding him in his office for 26 hours.

A week of mounting disruption followed before law enforcement was brought in to dismantle the uprising, resulting in hundreds of student arrests, injuries, next-level mayhem, a strike and Mr. Kirk’s resignation that summer. “It mushroomed beyond our wildest dreams,” Mark Rudd, the leader of Columbia’s chapter of Students for a Democratic Society, told me from his home in New Mexico recently.

More than a half-century later, it took Dr. Shafik about 24 hours to see that a significantly smaller group of protesters, about 108 in total, who had set up an encampment on the South Lawn in solidarity with Gaza, were arrested. Even the police seemed vaguely confused . John Chell, the department’s chief of patrol, described the targeted students as “peaceful,” telling a group of reporters after the sweep that they had reacted to the raid with “no resistance whatsoever and were saying what they wanted to say in a peaceful manner.”

It was not as if Columbia’s leadership in the late 1960s had been noble champions of free speech. Administrators had begun the academic year by banning indoor picketing. In his address to incoming students, Vice President David Truman warned that he would not “tolerate efforts to make the university an instrument of opposition to the established orders of society.” What those established orders were anymore, a few weeks after Martin Luther King’s assassination, could hardly have been less apparent. But it seemed obvious to the aides of Mayor John Lindsay, several of whom were invited onto campus by university leaders in the hope of defusing tensions, that aggressive police action was only bound to inflame what was happening.

The administration listened, until it didn’t. But at the very least, it made an attempt to engage in a process of deliberation. As Jay Kriegel , a young member of the Lindsay team, put it years later in an essay included in the book “A Time to Stir: Columbia ’68” : “We tried to make clear that we didn’t think anything would be normal the day after a thousand angry students confronted a thousand angry cops.”

Similarly now, the arrival of the N.Y.P.D., accompanied by the suspension and eviction of students involved in the dissent, has quieted nothing. Protests have spread to campuses around the country, and the virulence has only escalated. After 120 people were taken into custody at New York University this week, some of whom threw chairs and bottles at the police, Mayor Eric Adams said he believed that “outside agitators” were responsible for the worst acts of defiance — people coming around who “latch on to any protest.”

When I asked Mr. Rudd what might have gone differently in 1968, a year of extraordinary tumult, he pointed to certain elements of restraint. “We weren’t careful about verbal violence, calling the cops pigs,” for example. “We didn’t understand that if you’re going to employ nonviolent tactics, you have to have a nonviolent strategy. We reacted to police violence with violence.” This, he would come to realize long after he helped found and then disavowed the Weather Underground, had been a mistake.

Dr. Shafik, an economist by training and a former vice president at the World Bank, became Columbia’s 20th president only nine months ago — perhaps too little time to have absorbed the centrality of activism to the university’s identity. Unlike some of her predecessors, she arrived with few ties; Mr. Kirk took the reins having served as provost under Columbia’s 13th president, Dwight Eisenhower. Over the years, Columbia has proudly commemorated the events of 1968, on the occasion of big anniversaries, in its literature and so on. In 1985, when students fought for the university to sever its connections to apartheid South Africa, thousands protested over the course of 21 days. The president at the time, Michael Sovern, visited student hunger strikers in the hospital. Within six months Columbia became the first big American university to completely divest.

Ginia Bellafante has served as a reporter, critic and, since 2011, as the Big City columnist . She began her career at The Times as a fashion critic, and has also been a television critic. She previously worked at Time magazine. More about Ginia Bellafante