critical thinking reflection and perspective part ii

Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception

Cite this chapter.

• Robert H. Ennis  

5626 Accesses

55 Citations

Critical thinking under that name was inspired by pragmatic philosopher John Dewey (1910) and endorsed by analytic philosopher Max Black (1946). Dewey was revered by the progressive educators, who re-labeled his “reflective thinking” as “critical thinking,” a name I believe they originated and that persists to the present (see Aiken (1942) for a mixture of both terms). Black (1946), insofar as I can determine, wrote the first college text including the words “critical thinking” in the title.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Aiken, W. M. 1942. The Story of the Eight-Year-Study . New York: Harper & Brothers. America 2000: An Education Strategy . 1991. Washington DC. http://www.scribd.com /doc/29278340/109-America-2000-An-Education-Strategy.

Google Scholar  

Battersby, M. 2006. “Applied Epistemology and Argumentation in Epidemiology.” Informal Logic 26 (1): 41–62.

Black, M. 1946. Critical Thinking . New York: Prentice Hall.

Commission on the Humanities. 1980. The Humanities in American Life . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think . Boston: D. C. Heath.

Book   Google Scholar  

Ennis, R. H. 1964. “Operational Definitions.” American Educational Research Journal 1: 183–201.

Article   Google Scholar  

Ennis, R. H. 1968. “Enumerative Induction and Best Explanation.” The Journal of Philosophy 65: 523–530.

Ennis, R. H. 1969a. Logic in Teaching . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ennis, R. H. 1969b. Ordinary Logic . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Ennis, R. H. 1973. “The Responsibility of a Cause.” In Philosophy of Education 1973 , edited by Brian Crittendo. Edwardsville, IL: Studies in Philosophy and Education. 86–93.

Ennis, R. H. 1974a. “The Believability of People.” Educational Forum 38: 347–354.

Ennis, R. H. 1974b. “Definition in Science Teaching.” Instructional Science 3: 285–298.

Ennis, R. H. 1975. “Children’s Ability to Handle Piaget’s Propositional Logic: A Conceptual Critique.” Review of Educational Research 45: 1–41.

Ennis, R. H. 1976. “An Alternative to Piaget’s Conceptualization of Logical Competence.” Child Development 47: 903–919.

Ennis, R. H. 1980. “Presidential Address: A Conception of Rational Thinking.” In Philosophy of Education 1979 , edited by Jerrold Coombs. Bloomington, IL: Philosophy of Education Society. 1–30.

Ennis, R. H. 1981. “A Conception of Deductive Logic Competence.” Teaching Philosophy 4: 337–385.

Ennis, R. H. 1982a. “Identifying Implicit Assumptions.” Synthese 51: 61–86.

Ennis, R. H. 1982b. “Mackie’s Singular Causality and Linked Overdetermination.” In Philosophy of Science Association 1982 , edited by Peter D. Asquith and Thomas Nickles. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association. 55–64.

Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice , edited by J. B. Baron and R. J. Sternberg. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 9–26.

Ennis, R. H. 1989. “Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research.” Educational Researcher 18 (3): 4–10.

Ennis, R. H. 1991. “Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception.” Teaching Philosophy 14 (1): 5–25.

Ennis, R. H. 1992. “John Mcpeck’s Teaching Critical Thinking.” Educational Studies 23 (4): 462–472.

Ennis, R. H. 1996a. Critical Thinking . Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.

Ennis, R. H. 1996b. “Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability.” Informal Logic 18 (2 and 3): 165–182.

Ennis, R. H. 2001 “Argument Appraisal Strategy: A Comprehensive Approach.” Informal Logic 21 (2): 97–140.

Ennis, R. H. 2006. “Probably.” In Arguing on the Toulmin Model , edited by David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. 145–164.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Ennis, R. H. 2007. “‘Probable’ and Its Equivalents.” In Reason Reclaimed: Essays in Honor of J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson , edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto. Newport News, VA: Vale Press. 243–256.

Ennis, R. H. 2011. “Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective, Part I.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines 26 (1): 4–18.

Ennis, R. H. 2012. Analyzing and Defending Sole Singular Causal Claims. Paper presented at Biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, November 15–17, at San Diego, CA.

Ennis, R. H. 2013a. “Critical Thinking across the Curriculum: The Wisdom CTAC Program.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines 28 (2): 25–52.

Ennis, R. H. 2013b. The Nature of Critical Thinking (under “What Is Critical Thinking?”). Available from http://criticalthinking.net .

Follesdal, D. 1979. “Hermeneutics and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method.” Dialectica 33 (3/4): 319–336

Harman, G. 1965 (January). “The Inference to Best Explanation.” The Philosophical Review 74 (1): 88–95.

Harman, G. H. 1968. “Enumerative Induction as Inference to Best Explanation.” The Journal of Philosophy 65 (18): 529–533.

Harman, G. 1973. Thought . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Harmon, H. 1980. Executive Order No. 338. Long Beach, CA: The California State University and Colleges.

Hitchcock, D. 1980. “Deductive and Inductive: Types of Validity, Not Types of Argument.” Informal Logic Newsletter 2 (3): 9–11.

Hitchcock, D. 1985. “Enthymematic Arguments.” Informal Logic 7 (2 and 3): 83–97.

Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to Best Explanation (second edition). London: Routledge.

McPeck, J. 1990. Teaching Critical Thinking: Dialogue and Dialectic . New York: Routledge.

Norris, S., and Ennis, R. H. 1989. Evaluating Critical Thinking . Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.

Norris, S. P., and King, R. 1984. “Observation Ability: Determining and Extending Its Presence.” Informal Logic 6 (3): 3–9.

Obama, B. State of the Union 2014 Speech 2014. Available from http://www.whitehouse.gov /the-press-office/2014/01/28/president-barack-obamas-state-union-address.

Paul, R. 2012. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World . Anthology ed. Santa Rosa: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Roth, M. 2010. “Beyond Critical Thinking.” The Chronicle of Higher Education , January 3.

Skyrms, B. 1966. Choice and Chance . Belmont, CA: Dickenson.

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Copyright information.

© 2015 Martin Davies and Ronald Barnett

About this chapter

Ennis, R.H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In: Davies, M., Barnett, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, New York

Print ISBN : 978-1-349-47812-5

Online ISBN : 978-1-137-37805-7

eBook Packages : Palgrave Education Collection Education (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

(Stanford users can avoid this Captcha by logging in.)

• Send to text email RefWorks EndNote printer

Critical thinking : conceptual perspectives and practical guidelines

Available online.

• Cambridge Core

At the library

Green Library

More options.

• Find it at other libraries via WorldCat
• Contributors

Description

Creators/contributors, contents/summary.

• Part I. Foundations of Critical Thinking: 1. Frameworks for thinking
• 2. Memory and comprehension
• 3. Historical perspectives
• Part II. Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: 4. What is critical thinking? Definitions and conceptualisations
• 5. Analysis
• 6. Evaluation
• 7. Inference
• 8. Reflective judgment
• Part III. Critical Thinking in Real-World Settings: 9. Applications of critical thinking
• 10. Judgment, heuristics and biases
• 11. Critical thinking instruction and assessment
• 12. Pedagogical and learning strategies
• 13. Summary and conclusions.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

Bibliographic information

Browse related items.

• Stanford Home
• Maps & Directions
• Search Stanford
• Emergency Info
• Terms of Use
• Non-Discrimination
• Accessibility

© Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 .

• LEARNING SKILLS
• Study Skills
• Critical Thinking

Search SkillsYouNeed:

Learning Skills:

• A - Z List of Learning Skills
• What is Learning?
• Learning Approaches
• Learning Styles
• 8 Types of Learning Styles
• Understanding Your Preferences to Aid Learning
• Lifelong Learning
• Decisions to Make Before Applying to University
• Top Tips for Surviving Student Life
• Living Online: Education and Learning
• 8 Ways to Embrace Technology-Based Learning Approaches

Critical Thinking Skills

• Critical Thinking and Fake News
• Understanding and Addressing Conspiracy Theories
• Critical Analysis
• Top Tips for Study
• Staying Motivated When Studying
• Student Budgeting and Economic Skills
• Getting Organised for Study
• Finding Time to Study
• Sources of Information
• Assessing Internet Information
• Using Apps to Support Study
• What is Theory?
• Styles of Writing
• Effective Reading
• Critical Reading
• Note-Taking from Reading
• Note-Taking for Verbal Exchanges
• Planning an Essay
• How to Write an Essay
• The Do’s and Don’ts of Essay Writing
• How to Write a Report
• Academic Referencing
• Assignment Finishing Touches
• Reflecting on Marked Work
• 6 Skills You Learn in School That You Use in Real Life
• Top 10 Tips on How to Study While Working
• Exam Skills
• Writing a Dissertation or Thesis
• Research Methods
• Teaching, Coaching, Mentoring and Counselling
• Employability Skills for Graduates

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter and start improving your life in just 5 minutes a day.

You'll get our 5 free 'One Minute Life Skills' and our weekly newsletter.

We'll never share your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time.

What is Critical Thinking?

Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally, understanding the logical connection between ideas.  Critical thinking has been the subject of much debate and thought since the time of early Greek philosophers such as Plato and Socrates and has continued to be a subject of discussion into the modern age, for example the ability to recognise fake news .

Critical thinking might be described as the ability to engage in reflective and independent thinking.

In essence, critical thinking requires you to use your ability to reason. It is about being an active learner rather than a passive recipient of information.

Critical thinkers rigorously question ideas and assumptions rather than accepting them at face value. They will always seek to determine whether the ideas, arguments and findings represent the entire picture and are open to finding that they do not.

Critical thinkers will identify, analyse and solve problems systematically rather than by intuition or instinct.

Someone with critical thinking skills can:

Understand the links between ideas.

Determine the importance and relevance of arguments and ideas.

Recognise, build and appraise arguments.

Identify inconsistencies and errors in reasoning.

Approach problems in a consistent and systematic way.

Reflect on the justification of their own assumptions, beliefs and values.

Critical thinking is thinking about things in certain ways so as to arrive at the best possible solution in the circumstances that the thinker is aware of. In more everyday language, it is a way of thinking about whatever is presently occupying your mind so that you come to the best possible conclusion.

Critical Thinking is:

A way of thinking about particular things at a particular time; it is not the accumulation of facts and knowledge or something that you can learn once and then use in that form forever, such as the nine times table you learn and use in school.

The Skills We Need for Critical Thinking

The skills that we need in order to be able to think critically are varied and include observation, analysis, interpretation, reflection, evaluation, inference, explanation, problem solving, and decision making.

Specifically we need to be able to:

Think about a topic or issue in an objective and critical way.

Identify the different arguments there are in relation to a particular issue.

Evaluate a point of view to determine how strong or valid it is.

Recognise any weaknesses or negative points that there are in the evidence or argument.

Notice what implications there might be behind a statement or argument.

Provide structured reasoning and support for an argument that we wish to make.

The Critical Thinking Process

You should be aware that none of us think critically all the time.

Sometimes we think in almost any way but critically, for example when our self-control is affected by anger, grief or joy or when we are feeling just plain ‘bloody minded’.

On the other hand, the good news is that, since our critical thinking ability varies according to our current mindset, most of the time we can learn to improve our critical thinking ability by developing certain routine activities and applying them to all problems that present themselves.

Once you understand the theory of critical thinking, improving your critical thinking skills takes persistence and practice.

Try this simple exercise to help you to start thinking critically.

Think of something that someone has recently told you. Then ask yourself the following questions:

Who said it?

Someone you know? Someone in a position of authority or power? Does it matter who told you this?

What did they say?

Did they give facts or opinions? Did they provide all the facts? Did they leave anything out?

Where did they say it?

Was it in public or in private? Did other people have a chance to respond an provide an alternative account?

When did they say it?

Was it before, during or after an important event? Is timing important?

Why did they say it?

Did they explain the reasoning behind their opinion? Were they trying to make someone look good or bad?

How did they say it?

Were they happy or sad, angry or indifferent? Did they write it or say it? Could you understand what was said?

What are you Aiming to Achieve?

One of the most important aspects of critical thinking is to decide what you are aiming to achieve and then make a decision based on a range of possibilities.

Once you have clarified that aim for yourself you should use it as the starting point in all future situations requiring thought and, possibly, further decision making. Where needed, make your workmates, family or those around you aware of your intention to pursue this goal. You must then discipline yourself to keep on track until changing circumstances mean you have to revisit the start of the decision making process.

However, there are things that get in the way of simple decision making. We all carry with us a range of likes and dislikes, learnt behaviours and personal preferences developed throughout our lives; they are the hallmarks of being human. A major contribution to ensuring we think critically is to be aware of these personal characteristics, preferences and biases and make allowance for them when considering possible next steps, whether they are at the pre-action consideration stage or as part of a rethink caused by unexpected or unforeseen impediments to continued progress.

The more clearly we are aware of ourselves, our strengths and weaknesses, the more likely our critical thinking will be productive.

The Benefit of Foresight

Perhaps the most important element of thinking critically is foresight.

Almost all decisions we make and implement don’t prove disastrous if we find reasons to abandon them. However, our decision making will be infinitely better and more likely to lead to success if, when we reach a tentative conclusion, we pause and consider the impact on the people and activities around us.

The elements needing consideration are generally numerous and varied. In many cases, consideration of one element from a different perspective will reveal potential dangers in pursuing our decision.

For instance, moving a business activity to a new location may improve potential output considerably but it may also lead to the loss of skilled workers if the distance moved is too great. Which of these is the more important consideration? Is there some way of lessening the conflict?

These are the sort of problems that may arise from incomplete critical thinking, a demonstration perhaps of the critical importance of good critical thinking.

Further Reading from Skills You Need

The Skills You Need Guide for Students

Develop the skills you need to make the most of your time as a student.

Our eBooks are ideal for students at all stages of education, school, college and university. They are full of easy-to-follow practical information that will help you to learn more effectively and get better grades.

In Summary:

Critical thinking is aimed at achieving the best possible outcomes in any situation. In order to achieve this it must involve gathering and evaluating information from as many different sources possible.

Critical thinking requires a clear, often uncomfortable, assessment of your personal strengths, weaknesses and preferences and their possible impact on decisions you may make.

Critical thinking requires the development and use of foresight as far as this is possible. As Doris Day sang, “the future’s not ours to see”.

Implementing the decisions made arising from critical thinking must take into account an assessment of possible outcomes and ways of avoiding potentially negative outcomes, or at least lessening their impact.

• Critical thinking involves reviewing the results of the application of decisions made and implementing change where possible.

It might be thought that we are overextending our demands on critical thinking in expecting that it can help to construct focused meaning rather than examining the information given and the knowledge we have acquired to see if we can, if necessary, construct a meaning that will be acceptable and useful.

After all, almost no information we have available to us, either externally or internally, carries any guarantee of its life or appropriateness.  Neat step-by-step instructions may provide some sort of trellis on which our basic understanding of critical thinking can blossom but it doesn’t and cannot provide any assurance of certainty, utility or longevity.

Continue to: Critical Thinking and Fake News Critical Reading

See also: Analytical Skills Understanding and Addressing Conspiracy Theories Introduction to Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)

• Advanced Search
• All new items
• Journal articles
• Manuscripts
• All Categories
• Metaphysics and Epistemology
• Epistemology
• Metaphilosophy
• Metaphysics
• Philosophy of Action
• Philosophy of Language
• Philosophy of Mind
• Philosophy of Religion
• Value Theory
• Applied Ethics
• Meta-Ethics
• Normative Ethics
• Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
• Philosophy of Law
• Social and Political Philosophy
• Value Theory, Miscellaneous
• Science, Logic, and Mathematics
• Logic and Philosophy of Logic
• Philosophy of Biology
• Philosophy of Cognitive Science
• Philosophy of Computing and Information
• Philosophy of Mathematics
• Philosophy of Physical Science
• Philosophy of Social Science
• Philosophy of Probability
• General Philosophy of Science
• Philosophy of Science, Misc
• History of Western Philosophy
• Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
• Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
• 17th/18th Century Philosophy
• 19th Century Philosophy
• 20th Century Philosophy
• History of Western Philosophy, Misc
• Philosophical Traditions
• African/Africana Philosophy
• Asian Philosophy
• Continental Philosophy
• European Philosophy
• Philosophy of the Americas
• Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
• Philosophy, Misc
• Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
• Philosophy, General Works
• Teaching Philosophy
• Philosophy, Miscellaneous
• Other Academic Areas
• Natural Sciences
• Social Sciences
• Cognitive Sciences
• Formal Sciences
• Arts and Humanities
• Professional Areas
• Other Academic Areas, Misc
• Submit a book or article
• Upload a bibliography
• Personal page tracking
• Archives we track
• Information for publishers
• Introduction
• Submitting to PhilPapers
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Subscriptions
• Editor's Guide
• The Categorization Project
• For Publishers
• For Archive Admins
• PhilPapers Surveys
• Bargain Finder
• About PhilPapers
• Create an account

Critical Thinking

Reprint years, buy this book.

PhilArchive

External links.

• From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
• pdcnet.org (no proxy)
• Available at Amazon.com

Through your library

• Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
• Configure custom resolver

Similar books and articles

Citations of this work, references found in this work.

No references found.