problem solution essay sample questions

Calculate for all schools

Your chance of acceptance, your chancing factors, extracurriculars, what should i know before taking the act.

Hey everyone, I'm currently prepping for the ACT, and I'm feeling a bit stressed. Can anyone offer advice on what's essential to know for the ACT? Are there any particular concepts or strategies that helped you improve your score?

It's completely normal to feel stressed before taking the ACT, but with proper preparation and some essential information, you'll feel more confident. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Familiarize yourself with the test format: The ACT comprises four sections: English, Mathematics, Reading, and Science, followed by an optional Writing test. Each section has a different number of questions and corresponding time allotments.

- English: 75 questions in 45 minutes

- Mathematics: 60 questions in 60 minutes

- Reading: 40 questions in 35 minutes

- Science: 40 questions in 35 minutes

- Writing (Optional): 1 essay in 40 minutes

2. Understand the scoring system: Each section is scored between 1 and 36, with the four scores averaged to provide the composite score. If you take the optional Writing test, it is scored separately.

3. Develop a study plan: When preparing for the ACT, make a study schedule that allocates time for each section according to your strengths and weaknesses. Use official ACT practice tests to identify areas where you need to improve, and tailor your study plan accordingly.

4. Time management: Good time management is critical to successful test-taking. Practice answering questions under timed conditions to develop a sense of how long you can spend on each question without running out of time.

5. Strategies for each section: For the English section, strengthen your grammar and punctuation skills, and develop a strong understanding of rhetorical devices and strategies. In Mathematics, focus on basic algebraic concepts, geometry, and some trigonometry. Be sure to memorize important formulae and practice problem-solving. For the Reading section, improve your reading comprehension and skimming techniques. In the Science section, focus on developing data interpretation and analytical skills, as this section tests more on scientific reasoning than content knowledge.

6. Use various resources: Take advantage of online resources, such as Khan Academy and ACT.org, or find a good ACT prep book to guide you through the material.

7. Practice, practice, practice: Consistent practice is key to improving your score. Take full-length practice tests frequently to assess your progress, and review your errors to understand and correct your weaknesses.

8. Test day preparation: To reduce test day anxiety, familiarize yourself with your test center location, confirm the materials you need to bring, and establish a consistent sleep schedule in the days leading up to the test.

9. Remain adaptable: Even with good preparation, you might encounter unfamiliar questions or problems on test day. Stay flexible and use your critical thinking skills to tackle these challenges.

Remember that practice, time management, and a thorough understanding of the test format are essential to achieving your desired ACT score! Stay positive, be persistent, and keep refining your test-taking strategies. Good luck!

About CollegeVine’s Expert FAQ

CollegeVine’s Q&A seeks to offer informed perspectives on commonly asked admissions questions. Every answer is refined and validated by our team of admissions experts to ensure it resonates with trusted knowledge in the field.

Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison Essay

Introduction.

Dealing with ethical dilemmas in professional practice, especially those based on close interaction with people, is a thorough problem. The proposed scenario discusses a case that occurred with an incarcerated individual in prison. In this scenario, I am a social worker who helps inmates optimize their post-release rehabilitation and more effectively return to society. However, one of the inmates I work with recently assaulted a guard and asked me to help fabricate evidence to free him from court punishment. The following paper is based on a detailed ethical examination of this scenario, identifying the key issues and relevant APA codes provisions applicable to this case.

You have been facilitating a class at the prison to help prisoners find stability upon release. This rehabilitation work has allowed you to get to know many of the prisoners and network with many community resources that help convicts reestablish their lives after prison. In a recent trip to the prison, one of the prison’s requests that you evaluate them to “prove” they are not fit to stand trial for a recent prison incident. On the way out of the prison, you receive a phone call from the prosecutor’s office requesting your services to evaluate a prisoner (the same prisoner that just asked you for help) that assaulted a prison guard.

In the scenario proposed for the study, there are several conflicts of interest related to my professional activities. First, the inmate asks me to “prove” his innocence or lack of involvement in the beating of the guard, that is, to knowingly violate the law of fair trial in order to save him. In the context of collaborating closely with the prisoner in question, the objectivity of my decision may be vulnerable because I will need to choose between honesty and a desire to help the prisoner (Reynolds et al., 2021). Second, the prosecutor’s office is asking me to provide a qualitative assessment of the inmate’s actions, on which the final verdict probably depends to a greater extent. This results in a situation in which I am psychologically pressured on both sides, with the result that I will not be able to provide objective testimony, knowingly or unknowingly taking the position of one of the parties to the conflict.

Another ethical problem that is not as evident is the principle of informed consent. If the evaluation of an inmate at the request of the prosecutor’s office takes place in the presence of the inmate, that is, I will have to talk to him about the situation and take notes, I must obtain his informed consent. The purpose of this consent is to fully inform the inmate of the purpose of this conversation so that he understands the possible consequences of his words, but also to be honest with me (Jansen, 2020). Obtaining informed consent ensures that I have not coerced the inmate into participating in this interview and that I have considered the inmate’s best interests, which will also protect my professional reputation.

The final ethical conflict in this situation is the potential loss of trust on the part of the inmate. Because my job is to provide therapeutic and rehabilitative services to inmates, I must enjoy their trust and set an example as an honest and socially responsible citizen. However, if the information shared with me in a trusting relationship is used against the inmate, and if the inmate learns of it, it is almost guaranteed to affect the level of trust between us (Northrop & Sadoff, 2013). As a result, further practice with this prisoner would prove questionable because he would not be able to trust me, and I would not be able to be unbiased in his direction. Thus, the critical ethical issues in this scenario include the potential loss of trust, the problem of obtaining informed consent, and the vulnerability of being unbiased in a two-party conflict.

To address this scenario, it is necessary to address some of the principles of the APA Code of Ethics. One of the paramount ones is the principle of Human Relations and harm avoidance #3.04 (APA, 2017). If the results of our assessment conversation affect the trustworthiness of the relationship between the inmate and me, I will harm him and be unable to provide further support. In addition, Conflict of Interest principle #3.06 is also appropriate because my actions may benefit one party to the conflict against the interests of the other party. Informed Consent principle #3.10 is also relevant to the current scenario, including that I would have to inform the inmate of a possible violation of Confidentiality principle #4.01.

The specific APA codes governing the professional activities of social workers and psychologists are generally much broader. They are all listed in the Ethical Principles for Psychologists and the Code of Conduct, which regulates ethical issues and essential patient and stakeholder communication (APA, 2017). Some of the most critical codes controlling professional practice include the requirement to be competent (#2.01), obtaining informed consent (#3.10), avoiding harm (#3.10), avoiding outside relationships with patients that may affect practice effects (#3.05), and respecting confidentiality (#4.01). These APA codes are crucial and can be seen as governing professional practice and behavior in psychology. Every practicing psychologist should be familiar with the Ethical Principles for Psychologists and the Code of Conduct and adhere to its principles.

The solution to this scenario must be within the scope of the Code of Ethics and not contrary to any of its provisions. Since there is a conflict of interest, as a professional, I must disclose my commitment to the APA Code (#1.03) and report potential ethical violations (#1.05). Given all of these ethical concerns and my professional role, it is ethical to refuse the prosecutor’s request to evaluate a prisoner’s actions and to function as his advocate or prosecutor. My impartiality, professional reputation, and trusted relationship in psychological practice could be vulnerable if I were to accept the prosecutor’s request and become an interested party in this conflict. Instead, I would suggest that the prosecutor’s office contact an independent party who has not previously had any relationship with the inmate. This solution would resolve all of the ethical dilemmas shown above and lead to a more effective conclusion to the conflict.

APA. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct . American Psychological Association. Web.

Jansen, L. A. (2020). Informed consent, therapeutic misconception, and unrealistic optimism . Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 63 (2), 359-373. Web.

Northrop, J. K., & Sadoff, R. L. (2013). Confidentiality and disclosure of the forensic examination. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 41 (2), 302-303.

Reynolds, C. R., Altmann, R. A., & Allen, D. N. (2021). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C.R. Reynolds, R.A. Altmann, & D.N. Allen (Eds.), Mastering modern psychological testing (pp. 573-613). Springer.

• The Prosecutor v. Ms. Mazet: Against the Prosecution
• The Expanding Role of the Prosecutor in Juvenile Justice
• The APA Code of Ethics
• Ethical Idealism in Science: A Look at Einstein's Legacy
• Ethical Service Provision and Care Delivery
• Conflicts Related to Ethnic Differences: Summary of Articles
• Solutions to Wells Fargo Ethical Dilemma
• Morality and Ethics of Assisted Suicide
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2024, May 24). Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethical-analysis-of-conflict-of-interest-in-prison/

"Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison." IvyPanda , 24 May 2024, ivypanda.com/essays/ethical-analysis-of-conflict-of-interest-in-prison/.

IvyPanda . (2024) 'Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison'. 24 May.

IvyPanda . 2024. "Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison." May 24, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethical-analysis-of-conflict-of-interest-in-prison/.

1. IvyPanda . "Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison." May 24, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethical-analysis-of-conflict-of-interest-in-prison/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Ethical Analysis of Conflict of Interest in Prison." May 24, 2024. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethical-analysis-of-conflict-of-interest-in-prison/.

• Trending Now
• Foundational Courses
• Data Science
• Practice Problem
• Machine Learning
• System Design
• DevOps Tutorial

Welcome to the daily solving of our PROBLEM OF THE DAY with Nitin Kaplas . We will discuss the entire problem step-by-step and work towards developing an optimized solution. This will not only help you brush up on your concepts of Dynamic Programming but also build up problem-solving skills. In this problem, You have n stacks of books. Each stack of books has some nonzero height arr [i] equal to the number of books on that stack ( considering all the books are identical and each book has a height of 1 unit ). In one move, you can select any number of consecutive stacks of books such that the height of each selected stack of books arr[i] <= k . Once such a sequence of stacks is chosen, You can collect any number of books from the chosen sequence of stacks. What is the maximum number of books that you can collect this way?

Input 8 1 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 3 Output 3 Explanation  We can collect maximum books from consecutive stacks numbered 5, 6, and 7 having height less than equal to K.

Give the problem a try before going through the video. All the best!!! Problem Link: https://practice.geeksforgeeks.org/problems-preview/you-and-your-books/1