concept paper literature review

Concept Papers in Research: Deciphering the blueprint of brilliance

Concept papers hold significant importance as a precursor to a full-fledged research proposal in academia and research. Understanding the nuances and significance of a concept paper is essential for any researcher aiming to lay a strong foundation for their investigation.

Table of Contents

What Is Concept Paper

A concept paper can be defined as a concise document which outlines the fundamental aspects of a grant proposal. It outlines the initial ideas, objectives, and theoretical framework of a proposed research project. It is usually two to three-page long overview of the proposal. However, they differ from both research proposal and original research paper in lacking a detailed plan and methodology for a specific study as in research proposal provides and exclusion of the findings and analysis of a completed research project as in an original research paper. A concept paper primarily focuses on introducing the basic idea, intended research question, and the framework that will guide the research.

Purpose of a Concept Paper

A concept paper serves as an initial document, commonly required by private organizations before a formal proposal submission. It offers a preliminary overview of a project or research’s purpose, method, and implementation. It acts as a roadmap, providing clarity and coherence in research direction. Additionally, it also acts as a tool for receiving informal input. The paper is used for internal decision-making, seeking approval from the board, and securing commitment from partners. It promotes cohesive communication and serves as a professional and respectful tool in collaboration.

These papers aid in focusing on the core objectives, theoretical underpinnings, and potential methodology of the research, enabling researchers to gain initial feedback and refine their ideas before delving into detailed research.

Key Elements of a Concept Paper

Key elements of a concept paper include the title page , background , literature review , problem statement , methodology, timeline, and references. It’s crucial for researchers seeking grants as it helps evaluators assess the relevance and feasibility of the proposed research.

Writing an effective concept paper in academic research involves understanding and incorporating essential elements:

How to Write a Concept Paper?

To ensure an effective concept paper, it’s recommended to select a compelling research topic, pose numerous research questions and incorporate data and numbers to support the project’s rationale. The document must be concise (around five pages) after tailoring the content and following the formatting requirements. Additionally, infographics and scientific illustrations can enhance the document’s impact and engagement with the audience. The steps to write a concept paper are as follows:

1. Write a Crisp Title:

Choose a clear, descriptive title that encapsulates the main idea. The title should express the paper’s content. It should serve as a preview for the reader.

2. Provide a Background Information:

Give a background information about the issue or topic. Define the key terminologies or concepts. Review existing literature to identify the gaps your concept paper aims to fill.

3. Outline Contents in the Introduction:

Introduce the concept paper with a brief overview of the problem or idea you’re addressing. Explain its significance. Identify the specific knowledge gaps your research aims to address and mention any contradictory theories related to your research question.

4. Define a Mission Statement:

The mission statement follows a clear problem statement that defines the problem or concept that need to be addressed. Write a concise mission statement that engages your research purpose and explains why gaining the reader’s approval will benefit your field.

5. Explain the Research Aim and Objectives:

Explain why your research is important and the specific questions you aim to answer through your research. State the specific goals and objectives your concept intends to achieve. Provide a detailed explanation of your concept. What is it, how does it work, and what makes it unique?

6. Detail the Methodology:

Discuss the research methods you plan to use, such as surveys, experiments, case studies, interviews, and observations. Mention any ethical concerns related to your research.

7. Outline Proposed Methods and Potential Impact:

Provide detailed information on how you will conduct your research, including any specialized equipment or collaborations. Discuss the expected results or impacts of implementing the concept. Highlight the potential benefits, whether social, economic, or otherwise.

8. Mention the Feasibility

Discuss the resources necessary for the concept’s execution. Mention the expected duration of the research and specific milestones. Outline a proposed timeline for implementing the concept.

9. Include a Support Section:

Include a section that breaks down the project’s budget, explaining the overall cost and individual expenses to demonstrate how the allocated funds will be used.

10. Provide a Conclusion:

Summarize the key points and restate the importance of the concept. If necessary, include a call to action or next steps.

Although the structure and elements of a concept paper may vary depending on the specific requirements, you can tailor your document based on the guidelines or instructions you’ve been given.

Here are some tips to write a concept paper:

Example of a Concept Paper

Here is an example of a concept paper. Please note, this is a generalized example. Your concept paper should align with the specific requirements, guidelines, and objectives you aim to achieve in your proposal. Tailor it accordingly to the needs and context of the initiative you are proposing.

 Download Now!

Importance of a Concept Paper

Concept papers serve various fields, influencing the direction and potential of research in science, social sciences, technology, and more. They contribute to the formulation of groundbreaking studies and novel ideas that can impact societal, economic, and academic spheres.

A concept paper serves several crucial purposes in various fields:

In summary, a well-crafted concept paper is essential in outlining a clear, concise, and structured framework for new ideas or proposals. It helps in assessing the feasibility, viability, and potential impact of the concept before investing significant resources into its implementation.

How well do you understand concept papers? Test your understanding now! 

Fill the Details to Check Your Score

Role of AI in Writing Concept Papers

The increasing use of AI, particularly generative models, has facilitated the writing process for concept papers. Responsible use involves leveraging AI to assist in ideation, organization, and language refinement while ensuring that the originality and ethical standards of research are maintained.

AI plays a significant role in aiding the creation and development of concept papers in several ways:

1. Idea Generation and Organization

AI tools can assist in brainstorming initial ideas for concept papers based on key concepts. They can help in organizing information, creating outlines, and structuring the content effectively.

2. Summarizing Research and Data Analysis

AI-powered tools can assist in conducting comprehensive literature reviews, helping writers to gather and synthesize relevant information. AI algorithms can process and analyze vast amounts of data, providing insights and statistics to support the concept presented in the paper.

3. Language and Style Enhancement

AI grammar checker tools can help writers by offering grammar, style, and tone suggestions, ensuring professionalism. It can also facilitate translation, in case a global collaboration.

4. Collaboration and Feedback

AI platforms offer collaborative features that enable multiple authors to work simultaneously on a concept paper, allowing for real-time contributions and edits.

5. Customization and Personalization

AI algorithms can provide personalized recommendations based on the specific requirements or context of the concept paper. They can assist in tailoring the concept paper according to the target audience or specific guidelines.

6. Automation and Efficiency

AI can automate certain tasks, such as citation formatting, bibliography creation, or reference checking, saving time for the writer.

7. Analytics and Prediction

AI models can predict potential outcomes or impacts based on the information provided, helping writers anticipate the possible consequences of the proposed concept.

8. Real-Time Assistance

AI-driven chat-bots can provide real-time support and answers to specific questions related to the concept paper writing process.

AI’s role in writing concept papers significantly streamlines the writing process, enhances the quality of the content, and provides valuable assistance in various stages of development, contributing to the overall effectiveness of the final document.

Concept papers serve as the stepping stone in the research journey, aiding in the crystallization of ideas and the formulation of robust research proposals. It the cornerstone for translating ideas into impactful realities. Their significance spans diverse domains, from academia to business, enabling stakeholders to evaluate, invest, and realize the potential of groundbreaking concepts.

Frequently Asked Questions

A concept paper can be defined as a concise document outlining the fundamental aspects of a grant proposal such as the initial ideas, objectives, and theoretical framework of a proposed research project.

A good concept paper should offer a clear and comprehensive overview of the proposed research. It should demonstrate a strong understanding of the subject matter and outline a structured plan for its execution.

Concept paper is important to develop and clarify ideas, develop and evaluate proposal, inviting collaboration and collecting feedback, presenting proposals for academic and research initiatives and allocating resources.

I got wonderful idea

It helps a lot for my concept paper.

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• Reporting Research

Academic Essay Writing Made Simple: 4 types and tips

The pen is mightier than the sword, they say, and nowhere is this more evident…

Ensuring Academic Integrity and Transparency in Academic Research: A comprehensive checklist for researchers

Academic integrity is the foundation upon which the credibility and value of scientific findings are…

• AI in Academia

AI vs. AI: How to detect image manipulation and avoid academic misconduct

The scientific community is facing a new frontier of controversy as artificial intelligence (AI) is…

• Diversity and Inclusion

Need for Diversifying Academic Curricula: Embracing missing voices and marginalized perspectives

In classrooms worldwide, a single narrative often dominates, leaving many students feeling lost. These stories,…

• Career Corner
• Trending Now

Recognizing the signs: A guide to overcoming academic burnout

As the sun set over the campus, casting long shadows through the library windows, Alex…

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

As a researcher, what do you consider most when choosing an image manipulation detector?

Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature

What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process. 

Table of Contents

• What is the purpose of literature review? 
• a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction: 
• b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes: 
• c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs: 
• d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts: 

How to write a good literature review 

• Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question: 
• Decide on the Scope of Your Review: 
• Select Databases for Searches: 
• Conduct Searches and Keep Track: 
• Review the Literature: 
• Organize and Write Your Literature Review: 
• How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal? 
• Frequently asked questions 

What is a literature review?

A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.

What is the purpose of literature review?

A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2  

1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge. 

2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field. 

Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal  

3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research. 

4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered. 

5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research. 

6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature. 

Literature review example

Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic. 

Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:

Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: 

a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:

Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements. 

b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:

Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources. 

c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:

The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. 

d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:

Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning. 

Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!    

Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements. 

Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review. 

• Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field. 
• Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address. 
• Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research. 
• Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic. 
• Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review. 

Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. 

• Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement. 
• Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic. 
• Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature. 
• Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps. 
• Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review. 

Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free.   

Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research. 

• Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective. 
• Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field. 
• Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice. 
• Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field. 
• Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community. 

Conducting a literature review

Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1  

Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:

• Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study. 
• Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? 

Decide on the Scope of Your Review:

• Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview? 
• Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region? 
• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude? 

Select Databases for Searches:

• Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. 
• Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic. 

Conduct Searches and Keep Track:

• Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques. 
• Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability. 
• Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references. 

Review the Literature:

• Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies. 
• Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research. 
• Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives. 
• Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions. 
• Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research? 

Organize and Write Your Literature Review:

• Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches. 
• Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered. 
• Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). 
• Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research. 

Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!  

How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?

Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.   

Here’s how to use the Research feature:  

• Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations. 
• Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access. 
• Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review. 

The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.  

Frequently asked questions

A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.

Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.  

Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic. 

Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods. 

Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers.  Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved.  Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic.  Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings.  Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject.  It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.

The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review:  Introduction:   Provide an overview of the topic.  Define the scope and purpose of the literature review.  State the research question or objective.  Body:   Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology.  Critically analyze and evaluate each source.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies.  Highlight any methodological limitations or biases.  Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research.  Conclusion:   Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review.  Highlight the research gap.  Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.  Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.

Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows: 

References 

• Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.  Journal of criminal justice education ,  24 (2), 218-234. 
• Pan, M. L. (2016).  Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis. 
• Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.  San José State University Writing Center . 

Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.  

Try it for free or upgrade to  Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. It’s like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.  Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!

Related Reads:

• Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics 
• How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps 
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?
• How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?

6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level

Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to ace grant writing for research funding..., powerful academic phrases to improve your essay writing , how to write a high-quality conference paper, how paperpal’s research feature helps you develop and..., how paperpal is enhancing academic productivity and accelerating..., how to write a successful book chapter for..., academic editing: how to self-edit academic text with..., 4 ways paperpal encourages responsible writing with ai, what are scholarly sources and where can you....

• Research Guides

Literature Review: A Self-Guided Tutorial

Using concept maps.

• Literature Reviews: A Recap
• Peer Review
• Reading the Literature
• Developing Research Questions
• Considering Strong Opinions
• 2. Review discipline styles
• Super Searching
• Finding the Full Text
• Citation Searching This link opens in a new window
• When to stop searching
• Citation Management
• Annotating Articles Tip
• 5. Critically analyze and evaluate
• How to Review the Literature
• Using a Synthesis Matrix
• 7. Write literature review

Concept maps or mind maps visually represent relationships of different concepts. In research, they can help you make connections between ideas. You can use them as you are formulating your research question, as you are reading a complex text, and when you are creating a literature review. See the video and examples below.

How to Create a Concept Map

Credit: Penn State Libraries ( CC-BY ) Run Time: 3:13

• Bubbl.us Free version allows 3 mind maps, image export, and sharing.
• MindMeister Free version allows 3 mind maps, sharing, collaborating, and importing. No image-based exporting.

Mind Map of a Text Example

Credit: Austin Kleon. A map I drew of John Berger’s Ways of Seeing in 2008. Tumblr post. April 14, 2016. http://tumblr.austinkleon.com/post/142802684061#notes

Literature Review Mind Map Example

This example shows the different aspects of the author's literature review with citations to scholars who have written about those aspects.

Credit: Clancy Ratliff, Dissertation: Literature Review. Culturecat: Rhetoric and Feminism [blog]. 2 October 2005. http://culturecat.net/node/955 .

• << Previous: Reading the Literature
• Next: 1. Identify the question >>
• Last Updated: Feb 22, 2024 10:53 AM
• URL: https://libguides.williams.edu/literature-review

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.

Where, when, and why would I write a lit review?

There are a number of different situations where you might write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre.

A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. In these cases, the lit review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology.

Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as publications. In a class, a lit review may be assigned to help students familiarize themselves with a topic and with scholarship in their field, get an idea of the other researchers working on the topic they’re interested in, find gaps in existing research in order to propose new projects, and/or develop a theoretical framework and methodology for later research. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered.

What are the parts of a lit review?

Most lit reviews use a basic introduction-body-conclusion structure; if your lit review is part of a larger paper, the introduction and conclusion pieces may be just a few sentences while you focus most of your attention on the body. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.

Introduction:

• An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
• A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
• Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published, standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research paper)
• Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.

Conclusion:

• Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance
• Connect it back to your primary research question

How should I organize my lit review?

Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. Here are some examples:

• Chronological : The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not commonly known in your field). If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure).
• Thematic : If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women.
• Qualitative versus quantitative research
• Empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources
• Theoretical : In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research.

What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit review?

Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is available in our "Conducting Research" resources .

As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.

Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you:

• It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper.
• Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying to each other?
• Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often
• Read more about synthesis here.

The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources.

• UConn Library
• Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide
• Introduction

Literature Review: The What, Why and How-to Guide — Introduction

• Getting Started
• How to Pick a Topic
• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Sources & Lit. Reviews
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings

What are Literature Reviews?

So, what is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries." Taylor, D.  The literature review: A few tips on conducting it . University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre.

Goals of Literature Reviews

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?  A literature could be written to accomplish different aims:

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews .  Review of General Psychology , 1 (3), 311-320.

What kinds of sources require a Literature Review?

• A research paper assigned in a course
• A thesis or dissertation
• A grant proposal
• An article intended for publication in a journal

All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic.

Types of Literature Reviews

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

Narrative review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.

• Example : Predictors and Outcomes of U.S. Quality Maternity Leave: A Review and Conceptual Framework:  10.1177/08948453211037398  

Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L. K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . Plural Publishing.

• Example : The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review:  10.1057/s41599-022-01270-w

Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M. C., & Ilardi, S. S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Blackwell Publishing.

• Example : Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis:  10.1215/00703370-9164737

Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts .  Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53 (3), 311-318.

• Example : Women’s perspectives on career successes and barriers: A qualitative meta-synthesis:  10.1177/05390184221113735

Literature Reviews in the Health Sciences

• UConn Health subject guide on systematic reviews Explanation of the different review types used in health sciences literature as well as tools to help you find the right review type
• << Previous: Getting Started
• Next: How to Pick a Topic >>
• Last Updated: Sep 21, 2022 2:16 PM
• URL: https://guides.lib.uconn.edu/literaturereview

Community Blog

Keep up-to-date on postgraduate related issues with our quick reads written by students, postdocs, professors and industry leaders.

What is a Concept Paper and How do You Write One?

• By DiscoverPhDs
• August 26, 2020

What is a Concept Paper?

A concept paper is a short document written by a researcher before starting their research project, with the purpose of explaining what the study is about, why it is important and the methods that will be used.

The concept paper will include your proposed research title, a brief introduction to the subject, the aim of the study, the research questions you intend to answer, the type of data you will collect and how you will collect it. A concept paper can also be referred to as a research proposal.

What is the Purpose of a Concept Paper?

The primary aim of a research concept paper is to convince the reader that the proposed research project is worth doing. This means that the reader should first agree that the research study is novel and interesting. They should be convinced that there is a need for this research and that the research aims and questions are appropriate.

Finally, they should be satisfied that the methods for data collection proposed are feasible, are likely to work and can be performed within the specific time period allocated for this project.

The three main scenarios in which you may need to write a concept paper are if you are:

• A final year undergraduate or master’s student preparing to start a research project with a supervisor.
• A student submitting a research proposal to pursue a PhD project under the supervision of a professor.
• A principal investigator submitting a proposal to a funding body to secure financial support for a research project.

How Long is a Concept Paper?

The concept paper format is usually between 2 and 3 pages in length for students writing proposals for undergraduate, master’s or PhD projects. Concept papers written as part of funding applications may be over 20 pages in length.

How do you Write a Concept Paper?

There are 6 important aspects to consider when writing a concept paper or research proposal:

• 1. The wording of the title page, which is best presented as a question for this type of document. At this study concept stage, you can write the title a bit catchier, for example “Are 3D Printed Engine Parts Safe for Use in Aircraft?”.
• A brief introduction and review of relevant existing literature published within the subject area and identification of where the gaps in knowledge are. This last bit is particularly important as it guides you in defining the statement of the problem. The concept paper should provide a succinct summary of ‘the problem’, which is usually related to what is unknown or poorly understood about your research topic . By the end of the concept paper, the reader should be clear on how your research idea will provide a ‘solution’ to this problem.
• The overarching research aim of your proposed study and the objectives and/or questions you will address to achieve this aim. Align all of these with the problem statement; i.e. write each research question as a clear response to addressing the limitations and gaps identified from previous literature. Also give a clear description of your primary hypothesis.
• The specific data outputs that you plan to capture. For example, will this be qualitative or quantitative data? Do you plan to capture data at specific time points or at other defined intervals? Do you need to repeat data capture to asses any repeatability and reproducibility questions?
• The research methodology you will use to capture this data, including any specific measurement or analysis equipment and software you will use, and a consideration of statistical tests to help interpret the data. If your research requires the use of questionnaires, how will these be prepared and validated? In what sort of time frame would you plan to collect this data?
• Finally, include a statement of the significance of the study , explaining why your research is important and impactful. This can be in the form of a concluding paragraph that reiterate the statement of the problem, clarifies how your research will address this and explains who will benefit from your research and how.

You may need to include a short summary of the timeline for completing the research project. Defining milestones of the time points at which you intend to complete certain tasks can help to show that you’ve considered the practicalities of running this study. It also shows that what you have proposed is feasible in order to achieve your research goal.

If you’re pitching your proposed project to a funder, they may allocate a proportion of the money based on the satisfactory outcome of each milestone. These stakeholders may also be motivated by knowing that you intend to convert your dissertation into an article for journal publication; this level of dissemination is of high importance to them.

Additionally, you may be asked to provide a brief summary of the projected costs of running the study. For a PhD project this could be the bench fees associated with consumables and the cost of any travel if required.

Make sure to include references and cite all other literature and previous research that you discuss in your concept paper.

This guide gave you an overview of the key elements you need to know about when writing concept papers. The purpose of these are first to convey to the reader what your project’s purpose is and why your research topic is important; this is based on the development of a problem statement using evidence from your literature review.

Explain how it may positively impact your research field and if your proposed research design is appropriate and your planned research method achievable.

An abstract and introduction are the first two sections of your paper or thesis. This guide explains the differences between them and how to write them.

An academic transcript gives a breakdown of each module you studied for your degree and the mark that you were awarded.

Tenure is a permanent position awarded to professors showing excellence in research and teaching. Find out more about the competitive position!

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Browse PhDs Now

Find out the differences between a Literature Review and an Annotated Bibliography, whey they should be used and how to write them.

A science investigatory project is a science-based research project or study that is performed by school children in a classroom, exhibition or science fair.

Nick is a first year PhD student at Queen Mary University of London. The long-term goal of his research is to help game designers make games that support healthy engagement and well-being.

Dr Ayres completed her PhD at the University of Warwick in 2017, researching the use of diamond to make electrochemical sensors. She is now a research scientists in the water industry, developing different analytical techniques and sensors to help keep our water systems safe.

Join Thousands of Students

• USC Libraries
• Research Guides

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper

• 5. The Literature Review
• Purpose of Guide
• Design Flaws to Avoid
• Independent and Dependent Variables
• Glossary of Research Terms
• Reading Research Effectively
• Narrowing a Topic Idea
• Broadening a Topic Idea
• Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
• Academic Writing Style
• Applying Critical Thinking
• Choosing a Title
• Making an Outline
• Paragraph Development
• Research Process Video Series
• Executive Summary
• The C.A.R.S. Model
• Background Information
• The Research Problem/Question
• Theoretical Framework
• Citation Tracking
• Content Alert Services
• Evaluating Sources
• Primary Sources
• Secondary Sources
• Tiertiary Sources
• Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
• Qualitative Methods
• Quantitative Methods
• Insiderness
• Using Non-Textual Elements
• Limitations of the Study
• Common Grammar Mistakes
• Writing Concisely
• Avoiding Plagiarism
• Footnotes or Endnotes?
• Further Readings
• Generative AI and Writing
• USC Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides
• Bibliography

A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic.

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014.

Importance of a Good Literature Review

A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

• Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
• Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
• Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
• Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to:

• Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
• Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].

Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2011; Knopf, Jeffrey W. "Doing a Literature Review." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (January 2006): 127-132; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012.

Types of Literature Reviews

It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. First, there are the primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. Second are the reviews of those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond the primary studies. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field.

In composing a literature review, it is important to note that it is often this third layer of knowledge that is cited as "true" even though it often has only a loose relationship to the primary studies and secondary literature reviews. Given this, while literature reviews are designed to provide an overview and synthesis of pertinent sources you have explored, there are a number of approaches you could adopt depending upon the type of analysis underpinning your study.

Argumentative Review This form examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. Given the value-laden nature of some social science research [e.g., educational reform; immigration control], argumentative approaches to analyzing the literature can be a legitimate and important form of discourse. However, note that they can also introduce problems of bias when they are used to make summary claims of the sort found in systematic reviews [see below].

Integrative Review Considered a form of research that reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. This is the most common form of review in the social sciences.

Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent. Historical literature reviews focus on examining research throughout a period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory, phenomena emerged in the literature, then tracing its evolution within the scholarship of a discipline. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research.

Methodological Review A review does not always focus on what someone said [findings], but how they came about saying what they say [method of analysis]. Reviewing methods of analysis provides a framework of understanding at different levels [i.e. those of theory, substantive fields, research approaches, and data collection and analysis techniques], how researchers draw upon a wide variety of knowledge ranging from the conceptual level to practical documents for use in fieldwork in the areas of ontological and epistemological consideration, quantitative and qualitative integration, sampling, interviewing, data collection, and data analysis. This approach helps highlight ethical issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study.

Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem . Typically it focuses on a very specific empirical question, often posed in a cause-and-effect form, such as "To what extent does A contribute to B?" This type of literature review is primarily applied to examining prior research studies in clinical medicine and allied health fields, but it is increasingly being used in the social sciences.

Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.

NOTE: Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature.

Baumeister, Roy F. and Mark R. Leary. "Writing Narrative Literature Reviews."  Review of General Psychology 1 (September 1997): 311-320; Mark R. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Kennedy, Mary M. "Defining a Literature." Educational Researcher 36 (April 2007): 139-147; Petticrew, Mark and Helen Roberts. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide . Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2006; Torracro, Richard. "Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples." Human Resource Development Review 4 (September 2005): 356-367; Rocco, Tonette S. and Maria S. Plakhotnik. "Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and Distinctions." Human Ressource Development Review 8 (March 2008): 120-130; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

Structure and Writing Style

I.  Thinking About Your Literature Review

The structure of a literature review should include the following in support of understanding the research problem :

• An overview of the subject, issue, or theory under consideration, along with the objectives of the literature review,
• Division of works under review into themes or categories [e.g. works that support a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative approaches entirely],
• An explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others,
• Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their argument, are most convincing of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research.

The critical evaluation of each work should consider :

• Provenance -- what are the author's credentials? Are the author's arguments supported by evidence [e.g. primary historical material, case studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings]?
• Methodology -- were the techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research problem? Was the sample size appropriate? Were the results effectively interpreted and reported?
• Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove the author's point?
• Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing?
• Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject?

II.  Development of the Literature Review

Four Basic Stages of Writing 1.  Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.  Literature search -- finding materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3.  Data evaluation -- determining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4.  Analysis and interpretation -- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature.

Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1.  Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2.  What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3.  Should I summarize, synthesize, or critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4.  Should I evaluate the sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5.  Should I provide subheadings and other background information, such as definitions and/or a history? Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review sections. Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize your final review. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. Your professor will probably not expect you to read everything that's available about the topic, but you'll make the act of reviewing easier if you first limit scope of the research problem. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, a book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. Consider Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made. However, when writing a review in the social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be required. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. You can also use this method to explore what is considered by scholars to be a "hot topic" and what is not.

III.  Ways to Organize Your Literature Review

Chronology of Events If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials according to when they were published. This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on environmental studies of brown fields if the progression revealed, for example, a change in the soil collection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. Thematic [“conceptual categories”] A thematic literature review is the most common approach to summarizing prior research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thematic reviews are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. The difference in this example between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: themes related to the role of the Internet in presidential politics. Note that more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order. A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made. Methodological A methodological approach focuses on the methods utilized by the researcher. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American, British, and French websites. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the Internet on a particular political party. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.

Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. However, only include what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research problem.

Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write:

• Current Situation : Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
• Sources Used : Describes the methods and resources [e.g., databases] you used to identify the literature you reviewed.
• History : The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology.
• Selection Methods : Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature review. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed [i.e., scholarly] sources.
• Standards : Description of the way in which you present your information.
• Questions for Further Research : What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?

IV.  Writing Your Literature Review

Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When writing your review, keep in mind these issues.

Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings . Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the author, is not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for using your own words in reviewing the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others' ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work.

V.  Common Mistakes to Avoid

These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.

• Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem;
• You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevant sources to use in the literature review related to the research problem;
• Relies exclusively on secondary analytical sources rather than including relevant primary research studies or data;
• Uncritically accepts another researcher's findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis;
• Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review;
• Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and,
• Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.

Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques . London: SAGE, 2011; Literature Review Handout. Online Writing Center. Liberty University; Literature Reviews. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2016; Ridley, Diana. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students . 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2012; Randolph, Justus J. “A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review." Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. vol. 14, June 2009; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016; Taylor, Dena. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Academic Skills Centre. University of Canberra.

Writing Tip

Break Out of Your Disciplinary Box!

Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.

Frodeman, Robert. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity . New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Another Writing Tip

Don't Just Review for Content!

While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask:

• How are they organizing their ideas?
• What methods have they used to study the problem?
• What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem?
• What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?
• How have they used non-textual elements [e.g., charts, graphs, figures, etc.] to illustrate key points?

When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.

Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1 998.

Yet Another Writing Tip

When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On?

Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature:

• Look for repeating patterns in the research findings . If the same thing is being said, just by different people, then this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research?  Does it forge a new path? Or, does is merely add more of the same thing being said?
• Look at sources the authors cite to in their work . If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research problem.
• Search Google Scholar to identify who has subsequently cited leading scholars already identified in your literature review [see next sub-tab]. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. Here again, if the same authors are being cited again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic.

Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. and Rebecca Frels. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach . Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2016; Sutton, Anthea. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review . Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2016.

• << Previous: Theoretical Framework
• Next: Citation Tracking >>
• Last Updated: May 30, 2024 9:38 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• PLoS Comput Biol
• v.9(7); 2013 Jul

Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review

Marco pautasso.

1 Centre for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (CEFE), CNRS, Montpellier, France

2 Centre for Biodiversity Synthesis and Analysis (CESAB), FRB, Aix-en-Provence, France

Literature reviews are in great demand in most scientific fields. Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications [1] . For example, compared to 1991, in 2008 three, eight, and forty times more papers were indexed in Web of Science on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity, respectively [2] . Given such mountains of papers, scientists cannot be expected to examine in detail every single new paper relevant to their interests [3] . Thus, it is both advantageous and necessary to rely on regular summaries of the recent literature. Although recognition for scientists mainly comes from primary research, timely literature reviews can lead to new synthetic insights and are often widely read [4] . For such summaries to be useful, however, they need to be compiled in a professional way [5] .

When starting from scratch, reviewing the literature can require a titanic amount of work. That is why researchers who have spent their career working on a certain research issue are in a perfect position to review that literature. Some graduate schools are now offering courses in reviewing the literature, given that most research students start their project by producing an overview of what has already been done on their research issue [6] . However, it is likely that most scientists have not thought in detail about how to approach and carry out a literature review.

Reviewing the literature requires the ability to juggle multiple tasks, from finding and evaluating relevant material to synthesising information from various sources, from critical thinking to paraphrasing, evaluating, and citation skills [7] . In this contribution, I share ten simple rules I learned working on about 25 literature reviews as a PhD and postdoctoral student. Ideas and insights also come from discussions with coauthors and colleagues, as well as feedback from reviewers and editors.

Rule 1: Define a Topic and Audience

How to choose which topic to review? There are so many issues in contemporary science that you could spend a lifetime of attending conferences and reading the literature just pondering what to review. On the one hand, if you take several years to choose, several other people may have had the same idea in the meantime. On the other hand, only a well-considered topic is likely to lead to a brilliant literature review [8] . The topic must at least be:

• interesting to you (ideally, you should have come across a series of recent papers related to your line of work that call for a critical summary),
• an important aspect of the field (so that many readers will be interested in the review and there will be enough material to write it), and
• a well-defined issue (otherwise you could potentially include thousands of publications, which would make the review unhelpful).

Ideas for potential reviews may come from papers providing lists of key research questions to be answered [9] , but also from serendipitous moments during desultory reading and discussions. In addition to choosing your topic, you should also select a target audience. In many cases, the topic (e.g., web services in computational biology) will automatically define an audience (e.g., computational biologists), but that same topic may also be of interest to neighbouring fields (e.g., computer science, biology, etc.).

Rule 2: Search and Re-search the Literature

After having chosen your topic and audience, start by checking the literature and downloading relevant papers. Five pieces of advice here:

• keep track of the search items you use (so that your search can be replicated [10] ),
• keep a list of papers whose pdfs you cannot access immediately (so as to retrieve them later with alternative strategies),
• use a paper management system (e.g., Mendeley, Papers, Qiqqa, Sente),
• define early in the process some criteria for exclusion of irrelevant papers (these criteria can then be described in the review to help define its scope), and
• do not just look for research papers in the area you wish to review, but also seek previous reviews.

The chances are high that someone will already have published a literature review ( Figure 1 ), if not exactly on the issue you are planning to tackle, at least on a related topic. If there are already a few or several reviews of the literature on your issue, my advice is not to give up, but to carry on with your own literature review,

The bottom-right situation (many literature reviews but few research papers) is not just a theoretical situation; it applies, for example, to the study of the impacts of climate change on plant diseases, where there appear to be more literature reviews than research studies [33] .

• discussing in your review the approaches, limitations, and conclusions of past reviews,
• trying to find a new angle that has not been covered adequately in the previous reviews, and
• incorporating new material that has inevitably accumulated since their appearance.

When searching the literature for pertinent papers and reviews, the usual rules apply:

• be thorough,
• use different keywords and database sources (e.g., DBLP, Google Scholar, ISI Proceedings, JSTOR Search, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science), and
• look at who has cited past relevant papers and book chapters.

Rule 3: Take Notes While Reading

If you read the papers first, and only afterwards start writing the review, you will need a very good memory to remember who wrote what, and what your impressions and associations were while reading each single paper. My advice is, while reading, to start writing down interesting pieces of information, insights about how to organize the review, and thoughts on what to write. This way, by the time you have read the literature you selected, you will already have a rough draft of the review.

Of course, this draft will still need much rewriting, restructuring, and rethinking to obtain a text with a coherent argument [11] , but you will have avoided the danger posed by staring at a blank document. Be careful when taking notes to use quotation marks if you are provisionally copying verbatim from the literature. It is advisable then to reformulate such quotes with your own words in the final draft. It is important to be careful in noting the references already at this stage, so as to avoid misattributions. Using referencing software from the very beginning of your endeavour will save you time.

Rule 4: Choose the Type of Review You Wish to Write

After having taken notes while reading the literature, you will have a rough idea of the amount of material available for the review. This is probably a good time to decide whether to go for a mini- or a full review. Some journals are now favouring the publication of rather short reviews focusing on the last few years, with a limit on the number of words and citations. A mini-review is not necessarily a minor review: it may well attract more attention from busy readers, although it will inevitably simplify some issues and leave out some relevant material due to space limitations. A full review will have the advantage of more freedom to cover in detail the complexities of a particular scientific development, but may then be left in the pile of the very important papers “to be read” by readers with little time to spare for major monographs.

There is probably a continuum between mini- and full reviews. The same point applies to the dichotomy of descriptive vs. integrative reviews. While descriptive reviews focus on the methodology, findings, and interpretation of each reviewed study, integrative reviews attempt to find common ideas and concepts from the reviewed material [12] . A similar distinction exists between narrative and systematic reviews: while narrative reviews are qualitative, systematic reviews attempt to test a hypothesis based on the published evidence, which is gathered using a predefined protocol to reduce bias [13] , [14] . When systematic reviews analyse quantitative results in a quantitative way, they become meta-analyses. The choice between different review types will have to be made on a case-by-case basis, depending not just on the nature of the material found and the preferences of the target journal(s), but also on the time available to write the review and the number of coauthors [15] .

Rule 5: Keep the Review Focused, but Make It of Broad Interest

Whether your plan is to write a mini- or a full review, it is good advice to keep it focused 16 , 17 . Including material just for the sake of it can easily lead to reviews that are trying to do too many things at once. The need to keep a review focused can be problematic for interdisciplinary reviews, where the aim is to bridge the gap between fields [18] . If you are writing a review on, for example, how epidemiological approaches are used in modelling the spread of ideas, you may be inclined to include material from both parent fields, epidemiology and the study of cultural diffusion. This may be necessary to some extent, but in this case a focused review would only deal in detail with those studies at the interface between epidemiology and the spread of ideas.

While focus is an important feature of a successful review, this requirement has to be balanced with the need to make the review relevant to a broad audience. This square may be circled by discussing the wider implications of the reviewed topic for other disciplines.

Rule 6: Be Critical and Consistent

Reviewing the literature is not stamp collecting. A good review does not just summarize the literature, but discusses it critically, identifies methodological problems, and points out research gaps [19] . After having read a review of the literature, a reader should have a rough idea of:

• the major achievements in the reviewed field,
• the main areas of debate, and
• the outstanding research questions.

It is challenging to achieve a successful review on all these fronts. A solution can be to involve a set of complementary coauthors: some people are excellent at mapping what has been achieved, some others are very good at identifying dark clouds on the horizon, and some have instead a knack at predicting where solutions are going to come from. If your journal club has exactly this sort of team, then you should definitely write a review of the literature! In addition to critical thinking, a literature review needs consistency, for example in the choice of passive vs. active voice and present vs. past tense.

Rule 7: Find a Logical Structure

Like a well-baked cake, a good review has a number of telling features: it is worth the reader's time, timely, systematic, well written, focused, and critical. It also needs a good structure. With reviews, the usual subdivision of research papers into introduction, methods, results, and discussion does not work or is rarely used. However, a general introduction of the context and, toward the end, a recapitulation of the main points covered and take-home messages make sense also in the case of reviews. For systematic reviews, there is a trend towards including information about how the literature was searched (database, keywords, time limits) [20] .

How can you organize the flow of the main body of the review so that the reader will be drawn into and guided through it? It is generally helpful to draw a conceptual scheme of the review, e.g., with mind-mapping techniques. Such diagrams can help recognize a logical way to order and link the various sections of a review [21] . This is the case not just at the writing stage, but also for readers if the diagram is included in the review as a figure. A careful selection of diagrams and figures relevant to the reviewed topic can be very helpful to structure the text too [22] .

Rule 8: Make Use of Feedback

Reviews of the literature are normally peer-reviewed in the same way as research papers, and rightly so [23] . As a rule, incorporating feedback from reviewers greatly helps improve a review draft. Having read the review with a fresh mind, reviewers may spot inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and ambiguities that had not been noticed by the writers due to rereading the typescript too many times. It is however advisable to reread the draft one more time before submission, as a last-minute correction of typos, leaps, and muddled sentences may enable the reviewers to focus on providing advice on the content rather than the form.

Feedback is vital to writing a good review, and should be sought from a variety of colleagues, so as to obtain a diversity of views on the draft. This may lead in some cases to conflicting views on the merits of the paper, and on how to improve it, but such a situation is better than the absence of feedback. A diversity of feedback perspectives on a literature review can help identify where the consensus view stands in the landscape of the current scientific understanding of an issue [24] .

Rule 9: Include Your Own Relevant Research, but Be Objective

In many cases, reviewers of the literature will have published studies relevant to the review they are writing. This could create a conflict of interest: how can reviewers report objectively on their own work [25] ? Some scientists may be overly enthusiastic about what they have published, and thus risk giving too much importance to their own findings in the review. However, bias could also occur in the other direction: some scientists may be unduly dismissive of their own achievements, so that they will tend to downplay their contribution (if any) to a field when reviewing it.

In general, a review of the literature should neither be a public relations brochure nor an exercise in competitive self-denial. If a reviewer is up to the job of producing a well-organized and methodical review, which flows well and provides a service to the readership, then it should be possible to be objective in reviewing one's own relevant findings. In reviews written by multiple authors, this may be achieved by assigning the review of the results of a coauthor to different coauthors.

Rule 10: Be Up-to-Date, but Do Not Forget Older Studies

Given the progressive acceleration in the publication of scientific papers, today's reviews of the literature need awareness not just of the overall direction and achievements of a field of inquiry, but also of the latest studies, so as not to become out-of-date before they have been published. Ideally, a literature review should not identify as a major research gap an issue that has just been addressed in a series of papers in press (the same applies, of course, to older, overlooked studies (“sleeping beauties” [26] )). This implies that literature reviewers would do well to keep an eye on electronic lists of papers in press, given that it can take months before these appear in scientific databases. Some reviews declare that they have scanned the literature up to a certain point in time, but given that peer review can be a rather lengthy process, a full search for newly appeared literature at the revision stage may be worthwhile. Assessing the contribution of papers that have just appeared is particularly challenging, because there is little perspective with which to gauge their significance and impact on further research and society.

Inevitably, new papers on the reviewed topic (including independently written literature reviews) will appear from all quarters after the review has been published, so that there may soon be the need for an updated review. But this is the nature of science [27] – [32] . I wish everybody good luck with writing a review of the literature.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to M. Barbosa, K. Dehnen-Schmutz, T. Döring, D. Fontaneto, M. Garbelotto, O. Holdenrieder, M. Jeger, D. Lonsdale, A. MacLeod, P. Mills, M. Moslonka-Lefebvre, G. Stancanelli, P. Weisberg, and X. Xu for insights and discussions, and to P. Bourne, T. Matoni, and D. Smith for helpful comments on a previous draft.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) through its Centre for Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity data (CESAB), as part of the NETSEED research project. The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.

Literature Reviews

• Getting Started
• Choosing a Type of Review
• Developing a Research Question
• Searching the Literature
• Searching Tips
• ChatGPT [beta]
• Documenting your Search
• Using Citation Managers
• Concept Mapping
• Concept Map Definition

MindMeister

• Writing the Review
• Further Resources

Additional Tools

Google slides.

GSlides can create concept maps using their Diagram feature. Insert > Diagram > Hierarchy will give you some editable templates to use.

Tutorial on diagrams in GSlides .

MICROSOFT WORD

MS Word can create concept maps using Insert > SmartArt Graphic. Select Process, Cycle, Hierarchy, or Relationship to see templates.

NVivo  is software for qualitative analysis that has a concept map feature. Zotero libraries can be uploaded using ris files. NVivo Concept Map information.

A concept map or mind map is a visual representation of knowledge that illustrates relationships between concepts or ideas. It is a tool for organizing and representing information in a hierarchical and interconnected manner. At its core, a concept map consists of nodes, which represent individual concepts or ideas, and links, which depict the relationships between these concepts .

Below is a non-exhaustive list of tools that can facilitate the creation of concept maps.

www.canva.com

Canva is a user-friendly graphic design platform that enables individuals to create visual content quickly and easily. It offers a diverse array of customizable templates, design elements, and tools, making it accessible to users with varying levels of design experience. 

Pros: comes with many pre-made concept map templates to get you started

Cons : not all features are available in the free version

Explore Canva concept map templates here .

Note: Although Canva advertises an "education" option, this is for K-12 only and does not apply to university users.

www.lucidchart.com

Lucid has two tools that can create mind maps (what they're called inside Lucid): Lucidchart is the place to build, document, and diagram, and Lucidspark is the place to ideate, connect, and plan.

Lucidchart is a collaborative online diagramming and visualization tool that allows users to create a wide range of diagrams, including flowcharts, org charts, wireframes, and mind maps. Its mind-mapping feature provides a structured framework for brainstorming ideas, organizing thoughts, and visualizing relationships between concepts. 

Lucidspark , works as a virtual whiteboard. Here, you can add sticky notes, develop ideas through freehand drawing, and collaborate with your teammates. Has only one template for mind mapping.

Explore Lucid mind map creation here .

How to create mind maps using LucidSpark:

Note: U-M students have access to Lucid through ITS. [ info here ] Choose the "Login w Google" option, use your @umich.edu account, and access should happen automatically.

www.figma.com

Figma is a cloud-based design tool that enables collaborative interface design and prototyping. It's widely used by UI/UX designers to create, prototype, and iterate on digital designs. Figma is the main design tool, and FigJam is their virtual whiteboard:

Figma  is a comprehensive design tool that enables designers to create and prototype high-fidelity designs

FigJam focuses on collaboration and brainstorming, providing a virtual whiteboard-like experience, best for concept maps

Explore FigJam concept maps here .

Note: There is a " Figma for Education " version for students that will provide access. Choose the "Login w Google" option, use your @umich.edu account, and access should happen automatically.

www.mindmeister.com

MindMeister  is an online mind mapping tool that allows users to visually organize their thoughts, ideas, and information in a structured and hierarchical format. It provides a digital canvas where users can create and manipulate nodes representing concepts or topics, and connect them with lines to show relationships and associations.

Features : collaborative, permits multiple co-authors, and multiple export formats. The free version allows up to 3 mind maps.

Explore  MindMeister templates here .

• << Previous: Using Citation Managers
• Next: Writing the Review >>
• Last Updated: May 9, 2024 11:44 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.umich.edu/litreview

Preliminary Literature Review: A Guide for Effective Research

Discover the importance of a preliminary literature review in research and learn systematic techniques to conduct one effectively.

In the realm of scientific research, a thorough understanding of existing knowledge and developments in a specific field is essential for driving new discoveries. This is where a preliminary literature review comes into play, serving as the foundation for any successful research endeavor. In this article, we will delve into the significance of a preliminary literature review, explore its purpose, outline the steps involved, provide useful tips, and highlight the benefits of conducting this critical process.

Introduction to Preliminary Literature Review

The preliminary literature review serves as an initial investigation into the existing body of knowledge surrounding a research topic. It involves identifying and analyzing relevant sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. By conducting a preliminary literature review, researchers can uncover existing theories, identify knowledge gaps, and formulate research questions that contribute to the advancement of their field.

Purpose of a Preliminary Literature Review

The primary purpose of a preliminary literature review is to establish a strong foundation for the research project. It aids researchers in understanding the historical context, current trends, and gaps in knowledge related to their research topic. By reviewing existing literature, researchers can refine their research questions, develop appropriate methodologies, and avoid duplicating previous studies. A well-executed preliminary literature review enables researchers to build upon existing knowledge and contribute original insights to the scientific community.

Steps Involved in a Preliminary Literature Review

Identifying keywords and sources.

The first step in conducting a preliminary literature review is identifying keywords and sources relevant to the research topic. Keywords are essential for effective database searches, allowing researchers to locate pertinent articles, books, and other resources. It is crucial to select appropriate databases, such as PubMed , Scopus , or Web of Science, based on the subject area. Additionally, consulting experts, exploring reference lists of relevant publications, and utilizing citation-tracking tools can help researchers identify valuable sources.

Evaluating and Selecting Sources

Once researchers identify potential sources, they must evaluate their relevance, credibility, and quality. Critical evaluation ensures the inclusion of reliable and authoritative information in the preliminary literature review. Researchers should consider factors such as the author’s expertise, publication date, peer-review status, and the reputation of the journal or conference. Selecting high-quality sources enhances the validity and reliability of the review, strengthening the foundation of the research.

Identifying Themes, Debates, and Gaps

After gathering a range of sources, researchers should analyze and identify common themes, debates and gaps within the existing literature. Themes represent recurring topics or ideas, while debates involve conflicting viewpoints or unresolved issues. Identifying these aspects helps researchers understand the current state of knowledge and potential areas for further exploration. Recognizing gaps in existing literature enables researchers to formulate research questions that address unresolved issues and contribute to the advancement of their field.

Outlining the Structure of the Literature Review

Creating a clear and logical structure is crucial for organizing the preliminary literature review effectively. Researchers should establish a coherent flow of ideas, grouping related concepts together and providing a seamless transition between sections. An outline can serve as a roadmap for the review, ensuring that all key aspects are covered. By organizing the literature review in a structured manner, researchers can present their findings in a cohesive and engaging way.

Writing the Preliminary Literature Review

Introduction.

The introduction of the preliminary literature review sets the stage by providing a brief overview of the research topic, highlighting its significance, and explaining the objectives of the review. It should capture the reader’s attention, establish the context, and clearly state the research questions or objectives that the review aims to address.

Body of the Literature Review

The body of the preliminary literature review presents a critical analysis of the identified sources. It should discuss the main themes, debates, and gaps in the existing literature, highlighting key findings and theories. Researchers should compare and contrast different perspectives, evaluate the strengths and limitations of each study, and synthesize the information to generate new insights. Proper citation and referencing are essential to acknowledge the contributions of other researchers.

The conclusion of the preliminary literature review should summarize the key findings, emphasize the importance of the research topic, and outline potential avenues for future research. It should also address any unresolved debates or gaps in the existing literature and highlight the significance of the research project to be proposed.

Proofreading and Editing

Once you write the preliminary literature review, it is crucial to proofread and edit the document meticulously. Researchers should ensure that the review is free of grammatical errors, typos, and formatting inconsistencies. Proofreading also helps in refining the clarity and coherence of the review, enhancing its overall quality and readability.

Learn more about editing and proofreading in this article .

Tips for Writing an Effective Preliminary Literature Review

• Start early : Initiate the preliminary literature review early in the research process to allow ample time for thorough exploration and analysis.
• Be systematic : Develop a clear plan and follow a systematic approach to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant literature.
• Take detailed notes : Maintain organized notes while reviewing sources, highlighting key points, and recording relevant citations for easy reference.
• Stay focused : Maintain a clear focus on the research objectives and avoid being sidetracked by irrelevant or tangential information.
• Seek feedback : Share the preliminary literature review with peers or mentors to gather valuable feedback and incorporate suggestions for improvement.

Common Mistakes to Avoid when Writing a Preliminary Literature Review

• Lack of focus : Failing to establish a clear focus or research question can lead to a scattered and unfocused literature review.
• Insufficient analysis : Merely summarizing existing literature without critically analyzing the findings and identifying gaps limits the value of the review.
• Over-reliance on a single source : Relying heavily on a single source may introduce bias and limit the breadth of the literature review.
• Poor organization : Inadequate structuring and organization can make the review confusing and difficult to follow, hindering the reader’s understanding.

Benefits of Conducting a Preliminary Literature Review

Conducting a preliminary literature review offers several benefits to researchers. It helps researchers:

• Gain a comprehensive understanding of existing knowledge;
• Identify gaps and research opportunities;
• Develop research questions and hypotheses;
• Refine research methodologies and study designs;
• Avoid duplication and build upon existing research;
• Contribute original insights to the scientific community.

Tools and Resources for Conducting a Preliminary Literature Review

Several tools and resources can assist researchers in conducting a preliminary literature review effectively. Databases like PubMed , Scopus , and Web of Science offer vast collections of academic articles. Reference management tools such as EndNote, Zotero, and Mendeley facilitate organizing and citing sources. Furthermore, online communities and forums like ResearchGate provide opportunities to connect with other researchers and access valuable insights.

Examples of Good Preliminary Literature Reviews

Researchers can search for literature review examples on academic databases, such as PubMed , Google Scholar , or institutional repositories, by using relevant keywords related to their research topic. Additionally, many universities and research institutions have their own online databases where you can find literature reviews published by their faculty members or researchers.

When searching for literature reviews, it is helpful to include specific keywords related to your research topic, followed by phrases such as “literature review” or “systematic review.” This will help narrow down your search results and find relevant examples in your field of study.

Remember to cite properly any sources you use in your research and adhere to the referencing style required by your institution or publisher.

In conclusion, a preliminary literature review is an indispensable component of scientific research, providing researchers with a solid foundation for their investigations. By following the outlined steps, researchers can conduct a thorough review, identify gaps in knowledge, and contribute to their field. Writing an effective preliminary literature review requires meticulous attention to detail, critical analysis, and adherence to proper citation practices. With the right tools and resources, researchers can enhance their understanding of existing knowledge and effectively communicate their scientific findings.

Communicate Science Visually With The Best And Free Infographic Maker

Researchers can enhance their scientific communication through visually engaging infographics. Mind the Graph offers a comprehensive infographic maker, allowing scientists to present their research findings in a visually appealing and accessible manner. By utilizing Mind the Graph, researchers can create professional infographics that effectively communicate complex scientific concepts to a wide audience, making their research more accessible and impactful.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

Unlock Your Creativity

Create infographics, presentations and other scientifically-accurate designs without hassle — absolutely free for 7 days!

Content tags

• UWF Libraries

Literature Review: Conducting & Writing

• Sample Literature Reviews
• Steps for Conducting a Lit Review
• Finding "The Literature"
• Organizing/Writing
• APA Style This link opens in a new window
• Chicago: Notes Bibliography This link opens in a new window
• MLA Style This link opens in a new window

Sample Lit Reviews from Communication Arts

Have an exemplary literature review.

• Literature Review Sample 1
• Literature Review Sample 2
• Literature Review Sample 3

Have you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes?

Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have permission from the student to post?

Please contact Britt McGowan at [email protected] for inclusion in this guide. All disciplines welcome and encouraged.

• << Previous: MLA Style
• Next: Get Help! >>
• Last Updated: Mar 22, 2024 9:37 AM
• URL: https://libguides.uwf.edu/litreview

Concept, Creation, Services and Future Directions of Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review

• Review article
• Published: 23 May 2024

Cite this article

• Jiming Liu 1 ,
• Liping Duan 1 , 2 ,
• Siwei Lin 1 ,
• Ji Miao 1 &
• Jincheng Zhao 1 , 2  

78 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Currently, the engineering problems encountered in digital transformation of the construction industry are very complicated and need to be solved by integrating multiple technologies. Consequently, the concept of digital twin (DT) was introduced and quickly applied throughout the building lifecycle. Despite this, many practitioners lack understanding of DT in the construction industry (DT-CI) and its implementation. To overcome this issue, this paper presents a comprehensive and detailed review of DT-CI through a systematic literature review (SLR) that incorporates both quantitative and qualitative analysis. In this study, 222 DT-CI studies were selected from a pool of 2619 publications across multiple databases, and 43 related researches were supplemented by the backward snowballing method based on co-citation analysis to generate the final bibliographic database. This paper quantitatively analyzes the current state, hotspots, and development trends of DT-CI research through a bibliometric review, and systematically clarifies the concept, creation, services, and future directions of DT-CI through a framework-based review. Finally, based on the SLR outcomes, this paper offers recommendations for future work and DT-CI implementation. Contrary to other reviews within this field, this paper adheres to a rigorous SLR protocol to ensure the reproducibility of review results. Moreover, by comparing construction and non-construction DT concepts, we highlight the unique characteristics of DT-CI, namely its association with building information modeling (BIM) and emphasis on geometric reconstruction of building entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

What is at the Root of Construction 4.0: A Systematic Review of the Recent Research Effort

Exploring the Emergence of Digital Twins in the Construction Industry

Building Information Modelling in Healthcare Design and Construction: A Bibliometric Review and Systematic Review

Data availability.

Data will be made available on request.

Graham R, Jeremy L, Toby W (2021) Future of Construction - A Global Forecast for the Construction Industry to 2030. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/future-of-construction/ . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

Song Y, Koeck R, Luo S (2021) Review and analysis of augmented reality (AR) literature for digital fabrication in architecture. Autom Constr 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103762

Ali KN, Alhajlah HH, Kassem MA (2022) Collaboration and risk in Building Information Modelling (BIM): a systematic literature review. Buildings 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050571

Zhao Y, Taib N (2022) Cloud-based Building Information Modelling (Cloud-BIM): systematic literature review and bibliometric-qualitative analysis. Autom Constr 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104468

Boschert S, Rosen R (2016) Digital twin-the simulation aspect. In: Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers. pp 59–74

Grieves M (2014) Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275211047_Digital_Twin_Manufacturing_Excellence_through_Virtual_Factory_Replication . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

Shafto M, Conroy M, Doyle R, Glaessgen E et al (2010) DRAFT modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap - technology area 11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/501321main_TA11-MSITP-DRAFT-Nov2010-A1.pdf . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

Liu M, Fang S, Dong H, Xu C (2021) Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J Manuf Syst 58:346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017

Article   Google Scholar  

Jiang F, Ma L, Broyd T, Chen K (2021) Digital twin and its implementations in the civil engineering sector. Autom Constr 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103838

MarketsandMarkets (2022) Digital twin market by enterprise: Application, industry, and geography-global forecast to 2027. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/digital-twin-market-225269522.html . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

Boje C, Guerriero A, Kubicki S, Rezgui Y (2020) Towards a semantic construction Digital Twin: directions for future research. Autom Constr 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103179

Opoku D-GJ, Perera S, Osei-Kyei R, Rashidi M (2021) Digital twin application in the construction industry: a literature review. J Build Eng 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726

Opoku D-GJ, Perera S, Osei-Kyei R et al (2022) Drivers for Digital Twin Adoption in the Construction Industry: a systematic literature review. Buildings 12: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020113

Davila Delgado JM, Oyedele L (2021) Digital Twins for the built environment: learning from conceptual and process models in manufacturing. Adv Eng Inf 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101332

Hosamo HH, Nielsen HK, Alnmr AN et al (2022) A review of the Digital Twin technology for fault detection in buildings. Front Built Environ 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1013196

Hou L, Wu S, Zhang GK et al (2021) Literature Review of Digital Twins Applications in Construction Workforce Safety. Appl Sci-BASEL 11:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010339

Zhang H, Zhou Y, Zhu H et al (2021) Digital twin-driven intelligent construction: features and trends. SDHM Struct Durab Health Monit 15:183–206. https://doi.org/10.32604/SDHM.2021.018247

Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D et al (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 51:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009

Papaioannou D (2016) Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. 1–336

Paul J, Lim WM, O’Cass A et al (2021) Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). Int J Consum Stud. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Naghshbandi SN, Varga L, Hu Y (2021) Technologies for safe and resilient earthmoving operations: a systematic literature review. Autom Constr. 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103632

Wohlin C (2014) Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering

Bardou P, Mariette J, Escudié F et al (2014) Jvenn: an interactive Venn diagram viewer. BMC Bioinformatics 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-293

Palmatier RW, Houston MB, Hulland J (2018) Review articles: purpose, process, and structure. J Acad Mark Sci 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4

Pan Y, Zhang L (2023) Integrating BIM and AI for Smart Construction Management: current status and future directions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 30:1081–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09830-8

van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84:523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Paul J, Benito GRG (2018) A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pac Bus Rev 24:90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316

Paul J, Parthasarathy S, Gupta P (2017) Exporting challenges of SMEs: a review and future research agenda. J World Bus 52:327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003

Paul J, Rosado-Serrano A (2019) Gradual internationalization vs Born-Global/International new venture models: a review and research agenda. Int Mark Rev 36:830–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280

Callahan JL (2014) Writing literature reviews: a reprise and update. Hum Resour Dev Rev 13:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314536705

Lim WM (2020) Challenger marketing. Ind Mark Manag 84:342–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.009

Ozturk GB (2020) Interoperability in building information modeling for AECO/FM industry. Autom Constr 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103122

Negri E, Fumagalli L, Macchi M (2017) A review of the roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production systems. pp 939–948

Pan Y, Zhang L (2021) A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Autom Constr 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564

Lu Q, Parlikad A, Woodall P et al (2020) Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus. J Manag Eng 36. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000763

Lu Q, Xie X, Parlikad AK, Schooling JM (2020) Digital twin-enabled anomaly detection for built asset monitoring in operation and maintenance. Autom Constr 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103277

Angjeliu G, Coronelli D, Cardani G (2020) Development of the simulation model for Digital Twin applications in historical masonry buildings: the integration between numerical and experimental reality. Comput Struct 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106282

Tao F, Cheng J, Qi Q et al (2018) Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:3563–3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1

Alam K, El Saddik A (2017) C2PS: a Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the cloud-based Cyber-physical systems. IEEE ACCESS 5:2050–2062. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2657006

Khajavi SH, Motlagh NH, Jaribion A et al (2019) Digital Twin: Vision, benefits, boundaries, and creation for buildings. IEEE Access 7:147406–147419. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515

Kaewunruen S, Rungskunroch P, Welsh J (2019) A Digital-Twin evaluation of net Zero Energy Building for existing buildings. SUSTAINABILITY 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010159

Bosche F, Ahmed M, Turkan Y et al (2015) The value of integrating scan-to-BIM and scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: the case of cylindrical MEP components. Autom Constr 49:201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014

Boje C, Hahn Menacho ÁJ, Marvuglia A et al (2023) A framework using BIM and digital twins in facilitating LCSA for buildings. J Build Eng 76:107232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107232

Moretti N, Xie X, Merino Garcia J et al (2023) Federated Data Modeling for Built Environment Digital Twins. J Comput Civ Eng 37:04023013. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-4859

Phoong SW, Phoong SY, Khek SL (2022) Systematic Literature Review With Bibliometric Analysis on Markov Switching Model: Methods and Applications. SAGE Open 12:. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093062

Kaewunruen S, Lian Q (2019) Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems. J Clean Prod 228:1537–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.156

Bortolini R, Rodrigues R, Alavi H et al (2022) Digital Twins’ applications for Building Energy Efficiency: a review. Energies 15: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197002

Su S, Zhong RY, Jiang Y et al (2023) Digital twin and its potential applications in construction industry: state-of-art review and a conceptual framework. Adv Eng Inf 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102030

Patterson EA, Taylor RJ, Bankhead M (2016) A framework for an integrated nuclear digital environment. Prog Nucl Energy 87:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2015.11.009

Yoon S (2022) Virtual sensing in intelligent buildings and digitalization. Autom Constr 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104578

Pan Y, Braun A, Brilakis I, Borrmann A (2022) Enriching geometric digital twins of buildings with small objects by fusing laser scanning and AI-based image recognition. Autom Constr 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104375

Bolton A, Enzer M, Schooling J (2018) The Gemini principles: guiding values for the National Digital Twin and Information Management Framework. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.32260

Brilakis I, Pan Y, Borrmann A et al (2020) Built Environment Digital Twinning, 2020. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1553893 . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

RIBA (2020) RIBA: Plan of Work 2020 Overview; Royal Institute of British Architects: London, UK, https://www.architecture.com/-/media/GatherContent/Test-resources-page/Additional-Documents/2020RIBAPlanofWorkoverviewpdf.pdf . Accessed 24 Jul 2023

Gao X, Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Shelden DR, Tang S (2021) Internet of things enabled Data Acquisition Framework for Smart Building Applications. J Constr Eng Manag 147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001983

Alanne K, Sierla S (2022) An overview of machine learning applications for smart buildings. Sustain Cities Soc 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103445

Youn H-C, Yoon J-S, Ryoo S-L (2021) HBIM for the characteristics of Korean traditional wooden architecture: Bracket set modelling based on 3D scanning. Buildings 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110506

Wang W, Guo H, Li X et al (2022) Deep learning for assessment of environmental satisfaction using BIM big data in energy efficient building digital twins. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101897

Chen C, Zhao Z, Xiao J, Tiong R (2021) A conceptual Framework for estimating Building Embodied Carbon based on Digital Twin Technology and Life Cycle Assessment. SUSTAINABILITY 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413875

Pantoja-Rosero BG, Achanta R, Kozinski M et al (2022) Generating LOD3 building models from structure-from-motion and semantic segmentation. Autom Constr 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104430

Koltsios S, Fokaides P, Georgali P-Z et al (2022) An enhanced framework for next-generation operational buildings energy performance certificates. Int J Energy Res 46:20079–20095. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.8517

Jiang L, Shi J, Wang C, Pan Z (2023) Intelligent control of building fire protection system using digital twins and semantic web technologies. Autom Constr 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104728

Lydon GP, Caranovic S, Hischier I, Schlueter A (2019) Coupled simulation of thermally active building systems to support a digital twin. Energy Build 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.015

Agapaki E, Brilakis I (2021) CLOI: an Automated Benchmark Framework for Generating Geometric Digital Twins of Industrial Facilities. J Constr Eng Manag 147:04021145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002171

Hosamo HH, Svennevig PR, Svidt K et al (2022) A Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy Build 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111988

Zhao J, Feng H, Chen Q, Garcia de Soto B (2022) Developing a conceptual framework for the application of digital twin technologies to revamp building operation and maintenance processes. J Build Eng 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104028

Teisserenc B, Sepasgozar S (2021) Adoption of blockchain technology through digital twins in the construction industry 4.0: a PESTELS approach. Buildings 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120670

Mêda P, Calvetti D, Hjelseth E, Sousa H (2021) Incremental digital twin conceptualisations targeting data-driven circular construction. Buildings 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110554

Villa V, Naticchia B, Bruno G et al (2021) Iot open-source architecture for the maintenance of building facilities. Appl Sci-BASEL 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125374

Zhao L, Zhang H, Wang Q et al (2022) Digital Twin Evaluation of Environment and Health of Public Toilet Ventilation Design Based on building information modeling. Buildings 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040470

Luo J, Liu P, Cao L (2022) Coupling a physical replica with a Digital Twin: a comparison of participatory decision-making methods in an Urban Park Environment. ISPRS Int J GEO-Inf 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11080452

Tan Y, Chen P, Shou W, Sadick A-M (2022) Digital Twin-driven approach to improving energy efficiency of indoor lighting based on computer vision and dynamic BIM. Energy Build 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112271

Jiang W, Ding L, Zhou C (2022) Digital twin: Stability analysis for tower crane hoisting safety with a scale model. Autom Constr 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104257

Zhang J, Kwok HHL, Luo H et al (2022) Automatic relative humidity optimization in underground heritage sites through ventilation system based on digital twins. Build Environ 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108999

Kang K, Besklubova S, Dai Y, Zhong RY (2022) Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: a case study in Hong Kong. Waste Manag 143:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.027

Zhang C, Sun Q, Sun W et al (2021) A construction method of digital twin model for contact characteristics of assembly interface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:2685–2699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06751-x

Khan AA, Khan MA, Leung K et al (2022) A review of critical fire event library for buildings and safety framework for smart firefighting. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103412

Seo H, Yun W-S (2022) Digital Twin-Based Assessment Framework for Energy Savings in University Classroom Lighting. Buildings 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050544

Chiachío M, Megía M, Chiachío J et al (2022) Structural digital twin framework: Formulation and technology integration. Autom Constr 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104333

Ni Z, Liu Y, Karlsson M, Gong S (2022) Enabling Preventive Conservation of historic buildings through cloud-based Digital Twins: a Case Study in the City Theatre, Norrköping. IEEE Access 10:90924–90939. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3202181

Zhao Y, Wang N, Liu Z, Mu E (2022) Construction theory for a Building Intelligent operation and maintenance system based on Digital Twins and Machine Learning. Buildings 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020087

Xie X, Lu Q, Rodenas-Herraiz D et al (2020) Visualised inspection system for monitoring environmental anomalies during daily operation and maintenance. Eng Constr Archit Manag 27:1835–1852. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0640

Zhu H, Wang Y (2022) Intelligent analysis for safety-influencing factors of prestressed steel structures based on digital twins and random forest. METALS 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12040646

Dang H, Tatipamula M, Nguyen HX (2022) Cloud-based Digital Twinning for Structural Health Monitoring using deep learning. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 18:3820–3830. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3115119

Wang W, Guo H, Li X et al (2022) BIM Information integration based VR modeling in digital twins in industry 5.0. J Ind Inf Integr 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100351

Liu Z, Meng X, Xing Z, Jiang A (2021) Digital twin-based safety risk coupling of prefabricated building hoisting. Sensors 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113583

Lee D, Lee S (2021) Digital twin for supply chain coordination in modular construction. Appl Sci-BASEL 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135909

Liu Z, Zhang A, Wang W (2020) A framework for an indoor safety management system based on digital twin. SENSORS 20:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205771

Cruz Franco PA, Rueda Márquez, de la Plata A, Gómez Bernal E (2022) Protocols for the Graphic and Constructive Diffusion of Digital Twins of the Architectural Heritage That Guarantee Universal Accessibility through AR and VR. Appl Sci-BASEL 12:. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178785

Talmaki SA, Kamat VR (2022) Sensor Acquisition and Allocation for Real-Time Monitoring of Articulated Construction Equipment in Digital Twins. Sensors 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197635

Zhu H, Wang Y (2022) Key Component capture and Safety Intelligent Analysis of Beam String structure based on Digital Twins. SYMMETRY-BASEL 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061152

Liu Z, Shi G, Jiang A, Li W (2021) Intelligent discrimination Method based on Digital Twins for analyzing sensitivity of mechanical parameters of Prestressed Cables. Appl Sci-BASEL 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041485

Zhang T, Wang Z, Zeng Y et al (2022) Building Artificial-Intelligence Digital Fire (AID-Fire) system: a real-scale demonstration. J Build Eng 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105363

Greif T, Stein N, Flath CM (2020) Peeking into the void: Digital twins for construction site logistics. Comput Ind 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103264

Cheok EWW, Qian X, Chen C et al (2024) A local digital twin approach for identifying, locating and sizing cracks in CHS X-joints subjected to brace axial loading. Eng Struct 299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117085

Zhang K, Chen H, Dai H-N et al (2022) SpoVis: decision support system for Site Selection of Sports Facilities in Digital Twinning cities. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 18:1424–1434. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3089330

Chen L, Whyte J (2022) Understanding design change propagation in complex engineering systems using a digital twin and design structure matrix. Eng Constr Archit Manag 29:2950–2975. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2020-0615

Zhao Y, Cao C, Liu Z (2022) A Framework for Prefabricated Component Hoisting Management systems based on Digital Twin Technology. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030276 . Buildings 12:

Tran H, Nguyen TN, Christopher P et al (2021) A digital twin approach for geometric quality assessment of as-built prefabricated façades. J Build Eng 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102377

Wang X, Liu C, Song X, Cui X (2022) Development of an internet-of-things-based Technology System for Construction Safety Hazard Prevention. J Manag Eng 38:04022009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001035

Desogus G, Quaquero E, Rubiu G et al (2021) Bim and Iot sensors integration: a framework for consumption and indoor conditions data monitoring of existing buildings. SUSTAINABILITY 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084496

Fujii TY, Hayashi VT, Arakaki R et al (2022) A Digital Twin Architecture Model Applied with MLOps techniques to improve short-term energy consumption prediction. MACHINES 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10010023

Göçer Ö, Hua Y, Göçer K (2016) A BIM-GIS integrated pre-retrofit model for building data mapping. Build Simul 9:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0293-4

Lutters E (2018) Pilot production environments driven by digital twins. South Afr J Ind Eng 29:40–53. https://doi.org/10.7166/29-3-2047

Sepasgozar SME, Hui FKP, Shirowzhan S et al (2021) Lean practices using building information modeling (bim) and digital twinning for sustainable construction. SUSTAINABILITY 13:1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010161

Liu Z, Li A, Sun Z et al (2022) Digital Twin-based Risk Control during Prefabricated Building Hoisting operations. Sensors 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072522

Reja VK, Varghese K, Ha QP (2022) Computer vision-based construction progress monitoring. Autom Constr. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104245

Wang W-C, Weng S-W, Wang S-H, Chen C-Y (2014) Integrating building information models with construction process simulations for project scheduling support. Autom Constr 37:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.009

González-Böhme LF, Valenzuela-Astudillo E (2023) Mixed reality for safe and Reliable Human-Robot collaboration in timber Frame Construction. Buildings 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13081965

Kamari M, Ham Y (2022) AI-based risk assessment for construction site disaster preparedness through deep learning-based digital twinning. Autom Constr 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104091

Abdelrahman MM, Chong A, Miller C (2022) Personal thermal comfort models using digital twins: preference prediction with BIM-extracted spatial–temporal proximity data from Build2Vec. Build Environ 207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108532

Wong MO, Lee S (2023) Indoor navigation and information sharing for collaborative fire emergency response with BIM and multi-user networking. Autom Constr 148:104781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104781

Levine NM, Spencer BF Jr (2022) Post-earthquake building evaluation using UAVs: a BIM-Based Digital Twin Framework. Sensors 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030873

Agostinelli S, Cumo F, Guidi G, Tomazzoli C (2021) Cyber-physical systems improving building energy management: Digital twin and artificial intelligence. Energies 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082338

Moyano J, Gil-Arizón I, Nieto-Julián JE, Marín-García D (2022) Analysis and management of structural deformations through parametric models and HBIM workflow in architectural heritage. J Build Eng 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103274

Antón D, Medjdoub B, Shrahily R, Moyano J (2018) Accuracy evaluation of the semi-automatic 3D modeling for historical building information models. Int J Archit Herit 12:790–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1415391

Volk R, Luu TH, Mueller-Roemer JS et al (2018) Deconstruction project planning of existing buildings based on automated acquisition and reconstruction of building information. Autom Constr 91:226–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.017

Züst S, Züst R, Züst V et al (2021) A graph based Monte Carlo simulation supporting a digital twin for the curatorial management of excavation and demolition material flows. J Clean Prod 310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127453

Jiang Y, Li M, Guo D et al (2022) Digital twin-enabled smart modular integrated construction system for on-site assembly. Comput Ind 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103594

Ye Z, Jingyu L, Hongwei Y (2022) A digital twin-based human-robot collaborative system for the assembly of complex-shaped architectures. Proc Inst Mech Eng PART B-J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054221110960

Liu Z, Shi G, Qin J et al (2022) Prestressed Steel Material-Allocation path and construction using Intelligent Digital Twins. Metals 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12040631

Tian Y, Gao S (2023) A brief analysis of the View on the scale of Digital Twin City. Urban Plann Int 38:14–21. https://doi.org/10.19830/j.upi.2021.734

Liu Z, Shi G, Zhang A, Huang C (2020) Intelligent tensioning method for prestressed cables based on digital twins and artificial intelligence. SENSORS 20:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247006

Shahzad M, Shafiq MT, Douglas D, Kassem M (2022) Digital Twins in Built Environments: An Investigation of the Characteristics, Applications, and Challenges. Buildings 12:. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020120

Xu S, Wang J, Shou W et al (2021) Computer Vision Techniques in construction: a critical review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:3383–3397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09504-3

Qi CR, Su H, Mo K, Guibas LJ (2017) PointNet: Deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation. pp 77–85

Peraković D, Periša M, Zorić P, Cvitić I (2020) Development and implementation possibilities of 5G in industry 4.0. Lect Notes Mech Eng 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50794-7_17

Yue Q, Mu S, Zhang L et al (2022) Assisting Smart Construction with Reliable Edge Computing Technology. Front Energy Res 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.900298

Hu Z-Z, Leng S, Lin J-R et al (2022) Knowledge extraction and Discovery based on BIM: a critical review and future directions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29:335–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09576-9

Li J, Kassem M (2021) Applications of distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain-enabled smart contracts in construction. Autom Constr 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103955

Wang C, Song L-H, Yuan Z, Fan J-S (2023) State-of-the-art AI-based computational analysis in civil engineering. J Ind Inf Integr 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100470

Sidani A, Dinis FM, Sanhudo L et al (2021) Recent tools and techniques of BIM-Based virtual reality: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09386-0

Schiavi B, Havard V, Beddiar K, Baudry D (2022) BIM data flow architecture with AR/VR technologies: use cases in architecture, engineering and construction. Autom Constr 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104054

Wang X, Liang C-J, Menassa CC, Kamat VR (2021) Interactive and immersive process-level Digital Twin for Collaborative Human–Robot Construction Work. J Comput Civ Eng 35:04021023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000988

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 21DZ1204600).

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Jiming Liu, Liping Duan, Siwei Lin, Ji Miao & Jincheng Zhao

Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, Shanghai, China

Liping Duan & Jincheng Zhao

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jincheng Zhao .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal.

relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Liu, J., Duan, L., Lin, S. et al. Concept, Creation, Services and Future Directions of Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10140-4

Download citation

Received : 25 July 2023

Accepted : 01 May 2024

Published : 23 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10140-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research